Rate Adaptive Atrial Pacing in the Bradycardia Tachycardia Syndrome

In 42 patients (26 men, 16 women; mean age 69 ± 10 years), who were paced and medicated with antiarrhythmic drugs for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome, chronotropic response and AV conduction with rapid atrial pacing during exercise were studied. Patients were included if they had no second- or third-degree AV block, no complete bundle branch or bifascicular block, and a PQ interval ≤ 240 ms during sinus rhythm at rest. The interval between the atrial spike and the following Q wave (SQ) was measured in the supine position at rest with an AAI pacing rate of 5 beats/min above the sinus rate (SQ-R+5), and at the end of exercise with 110 beats/min (SQ-E110). Bicycle ergometry was performed using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol with the pacemakers being programmed to AAI with a fixed rate of 60 beats/min. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as peak exercise heart rate: (1) < 100 beats/min; (2) < 75% of the maximum predicted heart rate; or (3) the heart rate at half the maximum workload < 60 + 2 beats/min per mL O₂/kg per minute (calculated O₂ consumption). During exercise, one patient developed atrial fibrillation. Chronotropic incompetence was present in 71 % (29/41) of the patients according to definition 2, and in 76% (31/41) according to definition 1 or 3. Ten out of 41 patients (24%) exhibited a second-degree AV block with atrial pacing at 110 beats/min at the end of exercise. Only 9 out of the remaining 31 patients (29%) showed a physiological adaptation of the SQ-E110, and 21 patients (68%) exhibited a paradoxical increase of the SQ interval with rapid atrial pacing at the end of exercise as compared to the SQ-R+5. These observations indicate that the pacing system to be used in most patients paced and medicated for the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome should be dual chamber, and the option of rate adaptation should be considered.     

Clinical Interest of a Sensor Driven Algorithm Limiting Ventricular Pacing Rate During Supraventricular Tachycardia in Dual Chamber Pacing

A sensor driven algorithm limiting ventricular pacing rate during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is included in a dual chamber rate modulated pacemaker sensitive to acceleration forces (Relay, 294-03, Intermedics Inc.). According to the intensity of concomitant exercise, the ventricular pacing rate is limited either to the programmed maximum pacing rate (MPR) or to an interim lower limit, called "conditional ventricular tracking limit" (CVTL). The MPR prevails over the CVTL when the sensor calculated pacing rate exceeds the minimal rate by more than 20 beats/mm. The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of this algorithm in patients with intermittent SVT. Method: a Relay was implanted in four patients with a bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome and in four patients with complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). All had episodes of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. The units were programmed in DDDR: rate responsive parameters were adjusted by simulating the rate response during three levels of exercise to let the MPR override the CVTL only during strenuous exercise. Holter monitors and exercise testings were performed at 3-month follow-up. Results: in seven patients, Holter recordings showed Supraventricular arrhythmias at rest with a ventricular pacing rate limited to the CVTL. Appropriate rate increases during exercise testings were also demonstrated. Three devices had to be reprogrammed in DDIR tone patient suffering from nearly permanent atrial flutter and two patients not tolerating the CVTL pacing rate at rest). Conclusion: the CVTL algorithm is effective in protecting against high ventricular pacing rates during Supraventricular arrhythmias. It allows the selection of the DDDR mode even with a high MPR in patients with intermittent SVT.     

Practical Aspects of Rate Adaptive Atrial (AAI,R) Pacing: Clinical Experiences in 44 Patients

Forty-four patients with sinus node disease and chronotropic incompetence but no evidence of AV conduction disturbances were treated with rate adaptive atriul (AAI,R) pacemakers. Medtronic Activitrax and Siemens Sensolog activity sensing single chamber pulse generators were used. Twentyfour patients (55%) had the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. The mean folloiw-up time is 20 ± 14 months (range 1–48, median 17 months). All patients remain alive. Two patients were reoperated upon for lead problems without change of pacing mode. One patient developed symptomatic: srecond-degree Wenckebach block during follow-up, and received a DDD,R system. Although 22 of the patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs postoperatively, no further cases of significant AV conduction disturbances were seen. During rapid atrial pacing, exercise-induced enhancement of AV conduction was a consistent finding, although less pronounced in patients treated with beta-blocking drugs. One patient developed permanent atrial fibrillation with an adequate ventricular rate. By systematic reprogramming procedures, QRS complex sensing through the atrial electrode could be demonstrated in 25 patients (23/28 with unipolar and 2/16 with bipolar leads). it could be counteracted effectively by pulse generator program selection in all cases. Forty-two of 44 patients (95%) remain in AAI,R pacing with normal function, Rate adaptive atrial pacing can be successfully applied in this patient group.     

Radionuclide Evaluation of Dual Chamber Pacing: Comparison Between Variable AV Intervals and Ventricular Pacing

We prospectively evaluated changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, end diastolic volume, and stroke volume via radionuclide multigated acquisition study, Comparison was made between ventricular pacing and dual chamber pacing with varying AV intervals. The volumes and changes in ejection fraction were determined at rest, at set increased pacing rates, and during physiological stress. AV sequential pacing shows overall improvement in cardiac function in the majority of patients regardless of left ventricular function. The shorter AV interval would be appropriate for the majority of patients who have an atrial tracking mechanism (adequate intrinsic sensed atrial activity followed by ventricular pacing) and who undergo significant physiological stress.     

A New Principle of Rate Adaptive Pacing in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome

The most "natural" rate adaptive pacemaker is VDD for patients with AV block. Nothing equivalent exists for patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Even if they are paced in the AAI mode, the AV synchrony is often lost under exercise if nodal rhythms develop which cause the atria to contract against closed valves by retrograde conduction. We tried to develop a concept of rate adaptive pacing which is applicable in SSS patients by guaranteeing AV synchrony. It is known that AV delay shortens with increasing rate under exercise in normal subjects. Three AAI paced patients were evaluated to find out whether a similar correlation is valid between exercise and AV delay with constant rate. A nonconventional ECG was registered during the whole procedure by using an analog tape recorder. The pacing rate was changed with and without exercise on a bicycle to determine its influence on AV delay and by calculating the AV delay averaged over the last 8 beats. In all three patients a reproducible correlation existed between exercise and shortening of the AV delay. This effect was already detectable after 10 s. Increasing the pacing rate above "physiological" rates caused prolongation of the AV delay (over-stimulation phenomenon). We, therefore, concluded that measuring the AV delay in atrial paced patients with SSS by means of a ventricular electrode can be used as a fast parameter for rate adaptive pacing with AV synchrony. The "over-stimulation" phenomenon can additionally be utilized for controlling "physiological" rates depending on individual needs.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

Atrial Capture and Dual Chamber Pacing

During dual chamber pacing it is sometimes impossible to assess atrial capture even on the 12-lead ECG. We developed a strategy to identify atrial capture when it is not possible to do so by ECG, and when the ECG shows no evidence of spontaneous or paced atrial activity.     

Evaluation by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test of DDDR Versus DDD Pacing

In eight patients (age 62 ± 6 years) a DDDR pacemaker was implanted for sick sinus syndrome (three cases) or second- and third-degree AV block (five cases). In five subjects chronotropic incompetence (maximal heart rate on effort < 110 beats/min) was present before implantation. One month after implantation the patients were randomized to DDDR or DDD pacing for 3 weeks each, with subsequent crossover, and at the end of each period a symptom limited Cardiopulmonary exercise test (25 watts/2 min) was performed and the patients were requested to fill a symptoms questionnaire. Results: DDDR pacing, compared to DDD, was associated with higher maximal heart rates (127 ± 20 vs 110 ± 27 beats/min, P < 0.02), higher (VO₂ max (25.4 ± 6.1 vs 21.5 ± 7.8 mL/kg/per min, P < 0.03) and higher VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold (20.3 ± 5.0 vs 15.8 ± 4.9 mL/kg per min, P < 0.03), without significant differences in mean exercise time (526 ± 193 vs 472 ± 216 sec, NS). The increase in VO₂ max obtained in DDDR versus DDD was significantly related to the increase in maximal heart rate (r = 0.72, P < 0.05) and the increase in VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold obtained in DDDR versus DDD was related to the increase in heart rate at the anaerobic threshold (r = 0.81, P < 0.02). In patients with chronotropic incompetence the improvement obtained in DDDR versus DDD was even more significant (VO₂ max = 22.7 ± 5.9 vs 16.1 ± 4.4 mL/kg per min, P < 0.03; VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold = 18.4 ± 5.1 vs 13.2 ± 2.8 mL/kg per min, P < 0.05; exercise time = 438 ± 132 vs 352 ± 150 sec, P < 0.02). In the population as a whole, no significant differences were found relative to subjective symptoms, meanwhile in patients with chronotropic incompetence a better subjective tolerance was apparent with DDDR than with DDD pacing. In conclusion, DDDR pacing induces a significant improvement of exercice capacity, in comparison to DDD pacing, related to the ability to reach higher heart rates during exercise. This phenomenon is particulary evident in patients with chronotropic incompetence in whom DDDR pacing also is subjectively better tolerated.     

Comparison of Low Rate Dual Chamber Pacing to Activity Responsive Rate Variable Ventricular Pacing

A study was undertaken to evaluate exercise performance in 18 dual chamber pacemaker patients believed to be chronotropically incompetent. All patients were paced in a DDD AV synchronous mode at 80 beats per minute (beats/min) as well as an externally triggered, activity responsive VVIR mode. Patients underwent two single blind, randomized symptom-limited treadmill tests (Sheffield protocol). Four of the 18 patients achieved intrinsic rates greater than 100 beats/min and were deleted from the primary study. It was noted that all four of these patients performed best with intrinsic rate response and AV synchrony. Thirteen of the remaining 14 patients demonstrated improved exercise tolerance in the VVIR mode. Average exercise time in the VVIR mode (7:25 +/- 3:12 min) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the DDD mode (6:01 +/- 2:27 min). Work performed was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the VVIR mode (4.77 +/- 1.97 METS) than in the DDD mode (3.78 +/- 0.77 METS). Maximum heart rates were 83.86 +/- 5.11 beats/min in DDD mode versus 116.00 +/- 10.56 beats/min in VVIR mode. The results demonstrated that improved exercise tolerance can be achieved with single chamber rate variable pacing compared to DDD pacing in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, potential symptoms associated with loss of AV synchrony should be ruled out.     

Initial Clinical Experience with a Minute Ventilation Sensing Rate Modulated Pacemaker: Improvements in Exercise Capacity and Symptomatology

A minute ventilation sensing rate modulated pacemaker was implanted in nine patients with bradycardia. Minute ventilation is sensed in this pacemaker by means of a standard bipolar pacing electrode. Compared with exercise in the constant rate ventricular pacing (WI) mode at 1 month after pacemaker implantation, rate responsive pacing resulted in an improvement of exercise capacity of 33 ± 5% (from 437 ± 42 s in the WI mode to 593 ±57 s in the rate modulated mode, P < 0.01, Bruce protocol). This improvement was maintained in the seven patients in whom an exercise test was repeated at 3 months after implantation. The pacing rate was significantly correlated with oxygen consumption (r = 0.8A ± 0.04) and measured minute ventilation (r = 0.76 ± 0.06), Symptomatology in these patients was assessed by means of self-assessment questionnaires in a double blind, randomized cross-over study in which the pacemaker was alternatively programmed into the WI and rate modulated modes. Significant improvements in "shortness of breath" and "energy during daily activities" were documented during rate modulated pacing and "palpitations" and "chest pain" were not worsened. Most patients preferred the rate modulated mode during the study. In conclusion, rate modulated pacing by sensing minute ventilation resulted in better exercise capacity and symptomatology. The pacing rate also showed good correlation with the individual's oxygen requirement.     

Comparison of Ventricular Function in Atrial Rate Adaptive Versus Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacing During Exercise

The hemodynamic effects of two different pacing modes—rate adaptive atrial (AAIR) versus dual chamber (DDDR) pacing—were assessed in 12 patients with DDDR pacemakers during upright bicycle exercise first-pass radionuclide angiography using a multiwire gamma camera with tantalum-178 as a tracer. All patients had sinus node disease with intact AV conduction. Patients exercised to the same heart rate in random order in these two different pacing modes, AAIR and DDDR with AV delay (of 100 msec) selected to maintain 100% ventricular capture. Cardiac output in creased significantly above baseline values during exercise in both pacing modes: 154 ± 41% (mean ± SEM, P = 0.002) with AAIR, versus 95 ± 24% (P = 0.004) with DDDR (P = NS between the two modes). The peak filling rate, likewise, increased in both pacing modes (2.3 ± 0.21 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.8 ± 0.31 end-diastolic volumes/sec in AAIR [P = 0.0004] and 2.2 ± 0.18 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.4 ± 0.27 end-diastolic volumes/sec in DDDR [P = 0.0008]). LV ejection fraction was normal at rest (60 ± 4%, SEM) and did not significantly change with submaximal exercise in either pacing mode (both 56%, P = NS). No significant changes in end-diastolic volume or stroke volume indexes occurred with exercise in either pacing mode. Our study demonstrates that in patients with normal resting LV function, AAIR and DDDR pacing are equally effective in attaining appropriate increases in cardiac output and LV filling during exercise.     

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Dual chamber, rate responsive (DDDR) pacing is felt to be superior to ventricular, rate responsive (VVIR) pacing since it more closely mimics the normal electrical and hemodynamic activity of the heart. This reasoning has been used to justify the higher initial costs and increased complexity of dual chamber systems. This study was designed to determine if objective criteria could be identified during acute testing to justify implanting a dual chamber instead of a single chamber system in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Eight patients with DDDR pacemakers (implanted for chronotropic incompetence) and left ventricular dysfunction underwent exercise radionuclide angiography and graded exercise treadmill testing. Each patient performed the tests in the single (VVIR) and dual (DDDR) chamber modes in a randomized, blinded fashion. We found that objective parameters such as ejection fraction (31%± 13% vs 31%± 10%), exercise tolerance (6.1 ± 2.7 min vs 6.3 ± 2.9 min), oxygen consumption (VO₂) (941 ± 286 mL/min vs 994 ± 314 mL/min), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂) (995 ± 332 mL/min vs 1054 ± 356 mL/min), and maximum attainable workload (43 ± 24 W vs 46 ± 22 W) did not differ between the single and dual chamber pacing modes. These findings suggest that in the acute setting, the additional cost and complexity of dual chamber, rate responsive pacing cannot be justified by objective improvements in exercise tolerance in patients with underlying left ventricular dysfunction.     

Follow-Up of a Respiratory Rate Modulated Pacemaker

The efficacy of 27 respiration sensitive rate modulated pacemakers (Biorate RDP-3 Biotec) implanted in the left pectoral area was evaluated every 3 months during a mean follow-up period of 29 months (range 10-50 months). Rate modulation function was unchanged other than for three patients in whom the auxiliary leads became displaced. Two implants lost ventricular sensing in this nonprogrammable model. In all but the three patients, Holter monitoring demonstrated pacing rate variation corresponding to daily activity. Stress test duration increased from 8.2 +/- 1.5 minutes (in fixed rate VVI rate) to 12.83 +/- 2.0 minutes (in the VVIR mode) (P less than 0.05). Right arm movement increased the pacing rate by 5 +/- 3 beats/min (NS), while the left arm movement increase was 30 +/- 5 beats/min (P less than 0.05). Mental, arithmetic, and nifedipine tests did not change the rate modulated pacing rate. The system responded to a change in respiratory rate by an increase in stimulation rate. A satisfactory response in sensitivity and velocity was present only with medium-high workloads. Interference with rate modulation occurred with movement of the arm ipsilateral to the implanted pulse generator.     

Exercise Induced Sympathetic Influences Do Not Change Interatrial Conduction Times in VDD and DDD Pacing

Using telemetry, right atrial electrogram (RA), and marker channel of atrial sense events (M_A) in combination with the left atrial electrogram (LA), recorded by a filtered bipolar esophageal lead, interatrial conduction during submaximal exercise and at rest was examined in 46 DDD pacemaker patients. The RA-LA and M_A-LA conduction times measured in the presence of atrial sensing (VDD) as well as the conduction time S_A-LA from atrial stimulus (S_A) to LA, determined during atrial pacing (DDD) were found to be individual constants independent of exercise induced sympathetic influences. Thus, having determined an optima! mechanical interval (LA-LV)_mech/opt from left atrium to ventricle by other methods, the optimal AV delay for DDD as well as for VDD operation can be calculated by the sum of the appropriate interatrial conduction time (S_A-LA, respectively M_A-LA) and the (LA-LV)_mech/opt interval. Due to the constant S_A-LA and M_A-LA, the difference between these two values (AV delay correction interval) is a constant as well, which remains unchanged during exercise. Therefore, in selecting the rate responsive AV delay, only hemodynamic and not electrophysiologica] measurements need to be considered.     

Dual Chamber Rate Responsive Pacing to Allow Sotalol Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

In order to allow the use of sotalol to control ventricular tachycardia (VT), dual chambe rate responsive (DDDR) pacemakers were implanted in ten patients aged 6 to 73 years (mean 50 years) Nine presented with monomorphic VT (seven inducible at baseline electrophysiological study (EPS)) ant one with syncope (monomorphic VT at EPS). On sotalol, VT was initiated in only one. This patien received sotalol in the absence of an effective alternative agent. The mean dose was 468 ± 269 mg/day Indications for pacing were symptomatic sotalol induced bradycardia (7), sinus node dysfunction (1) postoperative complete heart block (1), and infra-His block at baseline EPS (1). At least five of these patients would have been candidates for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator had sotalol required discontinuation. Initially, nine patients were paced in DDDR mode and one, with normal AV conduciioi on sotalol, in AAIR. One patient was unable to tolerate sotalol despite pacing. One patient died suddenly after 35 months of symptom-free follow-up. There was a significant improvement in symptomatic statu, (P = 0.03) after pacing among the other eight patients with no recurrence of VT. The implantation of DDDR pacemaker may be indicated in selected patients with serious cardiac arrhythmias. With such < device programmed to an appropriate mode, sotalol can be used successfully where otherwise contraindi cated by bradycardia or preexisting conduction disease. For some patients this may obviate the expense inconvenience, and attendant risks of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.     

Lack of Physiological Adaptation of the Atrioventricular Interval to Heart Rate in Patients Chronically Paced in the AAIR Mode

Seventeen consecutive patients, aged 56 +/- 12, were chronically paced in the AAIR mode for a symptomatic sinus node disease with atrial chronotropic incompetence defined by a peak exercise heart rate (HR) less than 75% of the maximal predicted heart rate (MPHR) mean = 65 +/- 10%). Sensors used were activity sensing (n = 7), minute ventilation (n = 6), or respiratory rate (n = 4). Basic pacing rate was programmed at 71 +/- 5 beats/min and the maximal sensor rate at approximately 85% MPHR (143 +/- 10); other sensor parameters were programmed individually. Six months after implant, two standardized and symptom limited exercise tests were performed in random order, AAI and AAIR modes, respectively. AAIR pacing significantly improved peak exercise HR (139 +/- 14 vs 112 +/- 30 beats/min; P less than 0.01), maximal sustained workload (132 +/- 42 vs 110 +/- 38 watts; P less than 0.02), and total exercise duration (724 +/- 299 vs 594 +/- 245 sec; p less than 0.02) compared to the AAI mode. In all 17 patients, HR was continuously sensor driven in the AAIR mode, making it possible to precisely study the adaptation of the stimulus-R interval and of the stimulus-R:RR ratio during exercise. Six patients normally adapted with a progressive shortening. Six others did not adapt at all without any variation of interval. Five patients paradoxically increased their stimulus-R interval (286 +/- 10 msec at peak E vs 220 +/- 19 msec at rest) and their stimulus-R:RR ratio (67 +/- 20% vs 29 +/- 4%), producing P waves occurring immediately after, or even within the R wave of the preceding cycle; two patients complained of severe exercise related symptoms corresponding to the so-called "AAIR pacemaker syndrome." The principal factors involved in the nonadaptation of AV interval to HR were related to the patient (organic heart disease, with the particular problem of the denervated heart; the bradytachy syndrome; and the use of drugs, especially beta blockers and Class I antiarrhythmic drugs) or to the pacemaker ("overstimulation" phenomenon). These observations constitute an additional argument for wider indications of implanting DDDR units in these patients.     

Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

A Double-Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing

To assess the variation in paced rate during everyday activity and the importance of atrioventricular synchronization (AV synchrony) for submaximal exercise tolerance, atrial synchronous (DDD) and activity rate modulated ventricular (VVI,R) pacing were compared in 17 patients with high degree AV block. The patients were randomly assigned to either mode and evaluated by treadmill exercise to moderate exertion and by 24-hour Holter monitoring after 2 months in the DDD and VVI,R modes, respectively. At the end of the study, the patients were programmed to the pacing mode corresponding to the preferred study period. During the treadmill test, the mean exercise time to submaximal exertion (Borg 5/10), exertion ratings and respiratory rate did not differ between pacing modes despite a significantly lower ventricular rate in the VVI,R mode. The atrial rate during VVI,R pacing was significantly higher than the ventricular rate, but did not differ from the ventricular rate during DDD pacing. There was a diurnal variation in paced rate in both pacing modes. Paced ventricular rate was, however, higher and variation in paced rate greater in DDD compared to VVI,R pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode, three patients preferred the VVI,R mode, while five subjects did not express any preference. The results from this study indicate that the variation in paced rate during activity sensor-driven VVI,R pacing does not match that during DDD pacing neither during everyday activities nor during submaximal treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, no differences in exercise time, Borg ratings, and respiratory rate during submaximal exercise were found. Thus, for most patients with high degree AV block, DDD and VVI,R pacing seem equally satisfactory for submaximal exercise.     

Pacemaker Syndrome with AAI Rate Variable Pacing: Importance of Atrioventricular Conduction Properties, Medication, and Pacemaker Programmability

A patient who received an AAI Activitrax rate variable pacemaker for treatment of symptomatic sinus bradycardia is described. disopyramide prolonged the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast conducting atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway to such an extent, that conduction switched to the slow AV nodal pathway at low atrial pacing rates. This gave rise to symptoms of the pacemaker syndrome during moderate exercise because the paced atrial event was conducted with a long, spike to Q interval with occurrence of the paced atrial event just after the preceding QRS complex. A change of medication solved this problem. Programming a bipolar electrode configuration avoided sensing of far-field QRS signals with the associated problems of resetting the basic pacing interval as well as the upper rate interval. AAI rate variable pacing requires careful evaluation of AV conduction properties, AV conduction intervals as well as the influence of medication to be given. The use of multiprogrammable pacemakers with marker channel capability will significantly facilitate the understanding and resolution of anomalous behavior.     

VOOR—Nondemand Rate Modulated Pacing Necessitated by Myopotential Inhibition

This report describes the use of the temperature sensitive rate modulated nondemand pacing mode (VOOR) in a patient with significant myopotential inhibition of pacemaker output during exercise. The VOOR mode eliminated myopotential sensing which had prevented an exertion related increase in heart rate. The patient has done well with VOOH pacing for the past year. VOOR pacing is useful in selected cases.