Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing

JUTZY, R.V., ET AL.: Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing. While dual chamber pacing is considered superior to VVI pacing at rest, there is a continuing debate as to the relative benefit of AV synchrony versus rate increase with exercise. To evaluate this question and to correlate different methods of evaluation, 14 patients with DDDR pacemakers were studied using serial treadmill exercise test with a CAEP protocol. Patients were exercised in DDD, DDDR, and VVIR modes. Echo-Doppler cardiac outputs were determined and pulmonary gas exchange was measured during exercise. There was a significant improvement in cardiac output with exercise in the DDDR versus VVIR modes, and in DDDR versus DDD modes in patients with chronotropic incompetence. There were small increases in exercise duration in DDDR versus VVIR modes, and small but consistent increases in VO, at all levels of exercise, though not statistically significant. In this group of patients, DDDR pacing was superior to VVIR pacing, and superior to DDD pacing when chronotropic incompetence was present.     

A Prospective Multicenter Study Demonstrating Clinical Benefit with a New Accelerometer-Based DDDR Pacemaker

From November 1994 to October 1995, 63 patients (average age 66 years; 41 men) from 15 centers implanted with the Biotronik Dromos DR and Ergos TC 03 pulse generators were prospectively screened with an exercise test in the DDD mode for the presence of chronotropic incompetence (CI). Both pulse generators incorporate an identical accelerometer-based motion sensor. CI was defined as a maximum heart rate < 60% of age predicted maximum heart rate or 100 beats/min. Twenty-five patients (40%) met the criteria for CI. Two weeks later, CI patients were required to complete paired metabolic exercise testing in the DDD and DDDR modes on consecutive days with a 24-hour rest period. The order of testing was randomized and performed double blinded to minimize potential biases. Three patients who did not reach the anaerobic threshold (AT) and one patient who was unable to perform the metabolic testing were excluded from the analysis. Compared to the DDD mode, there were statistically significant improvements in the DDDR mode for all five endpoints: heart rate (84 ± 3.6 vs 113 ± 3.5 beats/min; P < 0.0001); total exercise time (8.23 ± 0.71 vs 9.15 ± 0.65 min; P = 0.0005); maximum VO₂ (17.76 ± 1.36 vs 20.43 ± 1.75 mL/kg per min; P = 0.0001); V0₂ at AT (13.1 ± 0.87 vs 14.59 ± 0.79 mL/kg per min; P < 0.01); and exercise time to AT (5.65 ± 0.61 vs 6.33 ± 0.53 min; P = 0.02). In conclusion, the results of paired metabolic exercise tests with the Dromos DR and Ergos TC 03 pulse generators demonstrate a clear clinical benefit using the accelerometer-based sensor in the CI patient     

Comparison of Low Rate Dual Chamber Pacing to Activity Responsive Rate Variable Ventricular Pacing

A study was undertaken to evaluate exercise performance in 18 dual chamber pacemaker patients believed to be chronotropically incompetent. All patients were paced in a DDD AV synchronous mode at 80 beats per minute (beats/min) as well as an externally triggered, activity responsive VVIR mode. Patients underwent two single blind, randomized symptom-limited treadmill tests (Sheffield protocol). Four of the 18 patients achieved intrinsic rates greater than 100 beats/min and were deleted from the primary study. It was noted that all four of these patients performed best with intrinsic rate response and AV synchrony. Thirteen of the remaining 14 patients demonstrated improved exercise tolerance in the VVIR mode. Average exercise time in the VVIR mode (7:25 +/- 3:12 min) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the DDD mode (6:01 +/- 2:27 min). Work performed was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the VVIR mode (4.77 +/- 1.97 METS) than in the DDD mode (3.78 +/- 0.77 METS). Maximum heart rates were 83.86 +/- 5.11 beats/min in DDD mode versus 116.00 +/- 10.56 beats/min in VVIR mode. The results demonstrated that improved exercise tolerance can be achieved with single chamber rate variable pacing compared to DDD pacing in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, potential symptoms associated with loss of AV synchrony should be ruled out.     

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Dual chamber, rate responsive (DDDR) pacing is felt to be superior to ventricular, rate responsive (VVIR) pacing since it more closely mimics the normal electrical and hemodynamic activity of the heart. This reasoning has been used to justify the higher initial costs and increased complexity of dual chamber systems. This study was designed to determine if objective criteria could be identified during acute testing to justify implanting a dual chamber instead of a single chamber system in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Eight patients with DDDR pacemakers (implanted for chronotropic incompetence) and left ventricular dysfunction underwent exercise radionuclide angiography and graded exercise treadmill testing. Each patient performed the tests in the single (VVIR) and dual (DDDR) chamber modes in a randomized, blinded fashion. We found that objective parameters such as ejection fraction (31%± 13% vs 31%± 10%), exercise tolerance (6.1 ± 2.7 min vs 6.3 ± 2.9 min), oxygen consumption (VO₂) (941 ± 286 mL/min vs 994 ± 314 mL/min), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂) (995 ± 332 mL/min vs 1054 ± 356 mL/min), and maximum attainable workload (43 ± 24 W vs 46 ± 22 W) did not differ between the single and dual chamber pacing modes. These findings suggest that in the acute setting, the additional cost and complexity of dual chamber, rate responsive pacing cannot be justified by objective improvements in exercise tolerance in patients with underlying left ventricular dysfunction.     

Quality-of-Life During DDD and Dual Sensor VVIR Pacing

Twenty-one patients (mean age 68 ± 8 years) with dual-sensor (QT + activity) DDDR pacemaker were randomly assigned to a crossover, double-blind study in order to evaluate their quality-of-life scores. All pacemakers were implanted for sick sinus syndrome (8 patients) or complete heart block (13 patients). The pacemakers were randomly programmed to VVIR or DDD pacing modes for 2-week periods and then the pacing mode was switched for another 2-week period. At the end of each period, the quality-of-life was evaluated by a questionnaire with regard to cardiovascular symptoms, physical activity, psychosocial and emotional functioning, and self-perceived health. Nineteen questions were scored 0–5 points each. Significant improvement in the mean total quality-of-life score (20.5 ± 14.9 vs 34.8 ± 17.4) as well as in dyspnea on effort, dizzy spells, palpitation, sweating, fatigue, lethargy, emotional functioning, and self-perceived health was observed during DDD compared to VVIR pacing. No question was scored in favor of VVIR pacing mode. Significant improvements during DDD pacing was demonstrated in all subgroups of patients (sick sinus syndrome, chronotropically competent and incompetent patients, and patients with high degree AV block). Eighteen patients preferred DDD pacing mode, while only one preferred WIR pacing mode. Two remaining patients expressed no preference. The results suggest that DDD pacing offers better quality-of-life than dual sensor VVIR pacing in all subgroups of patients commonly indicated for pacemaker implantation.     

AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in Patients with Impaired Sinus Node Chronotropy: An Echocardiographic and Cardiopulmonary Study

The aim of this study was to compare AAIR and DDDR pacing at rest and during exercise. We studied 15 patients (10 men, age 65 ± 6 years) who had been paced for at least 3 months with activity sensor rate modulated dual chamber pacemakers. All had sick sinus syndrome (SSS) with impaired sinus node chronotropy. The patients underwent a resting echocardiographic evaluation of systolic and diastolic LV function at 60 beats/min during AAIR and DDDR pacing with an AV delay, which ensured complete ventricular activation capture. Cardiac output (CO) was also measured during pacing at 100 beats/min in both pacing modes. Subsequently, the oxygen consumption (VO₂at) and VO₂at pulse at the anaerobic threshold were measured during exercise in AAIR mode and in DDDR mode with an AV delay of 120 ms. The indices of diastolic function showed no significant differences between the two pacing modes, except for patients with a stimulus-R interval > 220 ms, for whom the time velocity integral of LV filling and LV inflow time were significantly lower under AAI than under DDD pacing. At 60 beats/min, CO was higher under AAI than under DDD mode only when the stimulus-R interval was below 220 ms. For stimulus-R intervals longer than 220 ms, and also during pacing at 100 beats/min, the CO was higher in DDD mode. The stimulus-R interval decreased in all patients during exercise. The time to anaerobic threshold, VO₂at ond VO₂at pulse showed no significant differences between the two pacing modes. Our results indicate that, at rest, although AAIR pacing does not improve diastolic function in patients with SSS, it maintains a higher CO than does DDDR pacing in cases where the stimulus-R interval is not excessively prolonged. On exertion, the two pacing modes appear to be equally effective, at least in cases where the stimulus-R interval decreases in AAIR mode.     

Quality-of-Life in DDDR Pacing: Atrioventricular Synchrony or Rate Adaptation?

Al though differences in exercise performance have been observed between different rate adaptive modes, the relative impact of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and rate adaptation on quality of life (QOL) have not been determined. Thirty-three patients with either sinoatrial disease (18) or complete atrioventricular (AV) block (15) received DDDR pacemakers (16 minute ventilation sensing, 17 activity sensing). There were 11 males and 22 females, with a mean age of 66 ± 1 (range 39–78) years. The study was a double-blind, triple cross-over study comparing DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes. At the end of each 8-week study period in each mode, QOL was assessed by a questionnaire evaluating patients' functional class (Classes I-IV), physical malaise inventory (41 items), illness perception (43 items), and overall QOL rating based on a 48 items measure covering different aspects of the patients' daily life adjustment. Two patients required early crossover from VVIR mode during the study. Patients experienced significantly fewer physi cal malaise such as temperature intolerance, dyspnea, and palpitations in the DDDR mode, compared with either DDD or VVIR pacing. DDDR pacing reduced the perception of illness in 5 of 43 items compared to VVIR pacing, and improved stamina and appetite compared to DDD pacing. The overall QOL score was 102 ± 2, 105 ± 2, 113 ± 2 in the DDDR, DDD, and VVIR modes, respectively, with a higher score indicating a poorer QOL (DDDR/DDD vs VVIR, P < 0.02). There was no change in functional classes between the three pacing modes. In conclusion, VVIR pacing has a lower QOL compared with DDD pacing, which can be further enhanced with rate augmentation.     

Evaluation by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test of DDDR Versus DDD Pacing

In eight patients (age 62 ± 6 years) a DDDR pacemaker was implanted for sick sinus syndrome (three cases) or second- and third-degree AV block (five cases). In five subjects chronotropic incompetence (maximal heart rate on effort < 110 beats/min) was present before implantation. One month after implantation the patients were randomized to DDDR or DDD pacing for 3 weeks each, with subsequent crossover, and at the end of each period a symptom limited Cardiopulmonary exercise test (25 watts/2 min) was performed and the patients were requested to fill a symptoms questionnaire. Results: DDDR pacing, compared to DDD, was associated with higher maximal heart rates (127 ± 20 vs 110 ± 27 beats/min, P < 0.02), higher (VO₂ max (25.4 ± 6.1 vs 21.5 ± 7.8 mL/kg/per min, P < 0.03) and higher VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold (20.3 ± 5.0 vs 15.8 ± 4.9 mL/kg per min, P < 0.03), without significant differences in mean exercise time (526 ± 193 vs 472 ± 216 sec, NS). The increase in VO₂ max obtained in DDDR versus DDD was significantly related to the increase in maximal heart rate (r = 0.72, P < 0.05) and the increase in VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold obtained in DDDR versus DDD was related to the increase in heart rate at the anaerobic threshold (r = 0.81, P < 0.02). In patients with chronotropic incompetence the improvement obtained in DDDR versus DDD was even more significant (VO₂ max = 22.7 ± 5.9 vs 16.1 ± 4.4 mL/kg per min, P < 0.03; VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold = 18.4 ± 5.1 vs 13.2 ± 2.8 mL/kg per min, P < 0.05; exercise time = 438 ± 132 vs 352 ± 150 sec, P < 0.02). In the population as a whole, no significant differences were found relative to subjective symptoms, meanwhile in patients with chronotropic incompetence a better subjective tolerance was apparent with DDDR than with DDD pacing. In conclusion, DDDR pacing induces a significant improvement of exercice capacity, in comparison to DDD pacing, related to the ability to reach higher heart rates during exercise. This phenomenon is particulary evident in patients with chronotropic incompetence in whom DDDR pacing also is subjectively better tolerated.     

Is Accurate Rate Response Programming Necessary?

Exercise capacity and general well-being are improved by appropriately programmed rate responsive pacemakers when compared to fixed rate units. Ten patients had activity sensing DDDR units implanted for combined AV block and sinus node incompetence. Ten patients had Sensolog activity sensing VVIR units implanted for complete heart block. The effects of over and under programming of rate response in both dual and single chamber activity sensor rate adaptive pacemakers has been assessed subjectively by visual analog scales and specific activity questionnaires and objectively by graded treadmill testing and the performance of standardized daily activities. Patients were randomly programmed to absent rate response (VVI in the Sensolog group), hyporesponsive (DDD in the dual chamber group), appropriate response (VVIR, DDDR according to Manufacturer's instructions) and over responsive (VVIR+, DDDR+) in a double-blind crossover design. Thirty percent of patients demanded early crossover from VVI, 30% from DDDR+ and 50% from VVIR+. Perception of Exercise Capability was similar to objective exercise treadmill times which were shorter in VVI than in VVIR or VVIR+ (P less than 0.05) or control subjects (P less than 0.001). There was no difference between any dual chamber mode or control subjects. General well-being was poorest in DDDR+ and VVIR+ modes despite objective improvement in exercise capacity. Symptoms were least in VVIR and DDDR and all but one patient chose appropriate programming as their overall preferred mode. Thus, even inaccurate rate response programming results in similar and improved exercise capacity compared to absent rate response but overprogramming is unacceptable to most patients, confirming that appropriate programming and sensor specificity is critical in rate responsive pacing.     

Atrial Arrhythmia Management with Sensor Controlled Atrial Refractory Period and Automatic Mode Switching in Patients with Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacemakers

Although a long postventricular atrial refractory period fPVARP) may prevent the occurrence of pacemaker mediated tachycardias and inadvertent tracking of atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber (DDD) pacing, the maximum upper rate will necessarily be compromised. We tested the feasibility of using minute ventilation sensing in a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker (DDDR) to shorten the PVARP during exercise in 13 patients with bradycardias (resting PVARP = 463 ± 29 msec) to avoid premature upper rate behavior. Graded treadmill exercise tests in the DDD and DDDR modes at this PVARP resulted in maximum ventricular rates of 98 ± 8 and 142 ± 3 beats/min, respectively (P < 0.0001), due to chronotropic incompetence and upper rate limitation in the DDD mode, both circumvened with the use of sensor. In order to simulate atrial arrhythmias, chest wall stimulation was applied for 30 seconds at a rate of 250 beats/min at a mean unipolar atrial sensitivity of 0.82 mV. Irregular ventricular responses occurred in the DDD mode fthe rates at a PVARP of 280 and 463 ± 29 msec were, respectively 92 ± 5 and 66 ± 3 msec; P < 0.0001). In the DDDR mode at a PVARP of 463 ± 29 msec, regular ventricular pacing at 53 ± 2 beats/min occurred due to mode switching to VVIR mode in the presence of repetitive sensed atrial events within the PVARP. One patient developed spontaneous atrial fibrillation on follow-up, which was correctly identified by the pacemaker algorithm, resulting in mode switch from DDDR to regular VVIR pacing and preservation of rate response. In conclusion, sensor controlled PVARP allows a long PVARP to be used at rest without limiting the maximum rate during exercise. In addition, to offer protection against retrograde conduction, a long PVARP and mode switching also limit the rate during atrial arrhythmias and allow regular ventricular rate responses according to the physiological demands.     

Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise in Children with Activity Sensing Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacemakers

The physiological benefits of activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing)VVIR) over fixed rate pacing)VVI) were investigated in 14 children during incremenlal cycle exercise. Based on their heart rhythm response during exercise, children were divided into two groups. Group I patients)13 ± 4 years) remained in a paced-only rhythm when exercised. Group II patients)16 ± 7 years) were paced at rest but converted to sinus rhythm with exercise. In Group I patients, the significant physioJogicol benefits of VVIR over VVI pacing were evidenced hy a 51% increase in peak heart rate)HRmax) and a 16% increase in exercise duration and maximum oxygen uptake)VO₂max). Additionally, a 27% reduction in peak oxygen pulse)O₂Pmax) was found, reflecting a similar decrease in stroke volume. The cardiorespiraiory responses of Group I and 11 patients were compared in terms of percent of predicted normal values. Although Group I patients in the VVIR mode attained a better exercise performance than in the VVI mode and a normal O₂Pmax)108% pred). their HRmax)62% pred) and VO₂max)70% pred) fell far below normal values. In comparison. Group II patients, who went into sinus rhythm, achieved normal values for HRmax)84% pred), VO₂max)90% pred), and O₂Pmax)97% pred). The higher pacing rates attained by Group I patients in the VVIR mode may have allowed them to reach not only a higher cardiac output but also a more normal stroke volume at peak exercise than in the VVI mode. However, the overall exercise performance of children paced in the VVI and VVIR modes were significantly diminished compared to the performance of children who went into sinus rhythm with exercise.)     

Early Clinical Experience with a Minute Ventilation Sensor DDDR Pacemaker

The new DDDR pacemaker META DDDR utilizes a minute veritilation sensor based on transthoracic impedance measurements. The sensor determines the metabolic indicated interval, the atrioventricular (AV) delay and the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). The baseline PVARP must be carefully selected to define nonphysiological tachycardias. If a Pwave falls within the PVARP the pacemaker will automatically switch to the VVIR mode. This behavior prevents tracking of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT). Twenty-eight patients with sinus node dysfunction (n = 20), AV junction ablation (n = 5), complete or intermittent AV block (n = 3); who received a META DDDR pacemaker were studied. The mean age was 65 ± 13 years. Results: mode switching (reversion) to VVIR was observed in 57% of the patients. Forty-two percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a stress test four related to PAT, and seven to sinus tachycardia. Fifty percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a 24-hour Holter, four related to PAT, three to retrograde P wave sensing, and two to sinus tachycardia. At the last follow-up, 20 of the 26 patients initially programmed to the DDDR mode remained in the DDDR mode, while five were reprogrammed to the DDD and one to the VVIR mode. Mode switching has a high sensitivity but a low specificity for PAT. It appears to be a useful approach to prevent rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Careful PVARP programming is critical to appropriate reversion behavior, but further modifications of the algorithm are needed to improve its performance.     

A Randomized, Single-Blind Crossover Comparison of the Effects of Chronic DDD and Dual Sensor VVIR Pacing Mode on Quality-of- Life and Cardiopulmonary Performance in Complete Heart Block

The aim of this study was to compare DDD and dual sensor VVIR (activity and QT) pacing modes in complete AV block (CAVB). Eighteen patients (14 men and 4 women, aged 70 ± 6.5 years) implanted with a dual chamber, dual sensor pacemaker for CAVB with normal sinus node chronotropic function were studied. A quality-of-life and cardiovascular symptom questionnaire, and a treadmill exercise test were completed after a period of VVIR and a period of DDD pacing, each lasting 1 month. Overall quality-of-life and cardiovascular symptoms did not significantly differ, though three patients felt discomfort during VVIR mode. There was no significant statistical difference in Cardiopulmonary parameters. DDD and VVIR modes yielded the following respective data: maximum heart rate = 105.7 ± 21.8 beats/minute versus 107.6 ± 21.6 beats/minute (NS); maximum workload = 60 ± 33.4 W versus 59.3 ± 37.8 W (NS); treadmill duration = 10.1 ± 3.8 minute versus 10.1 ± 3.6 minute (NS); oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold = 14.6 ± 4.1 ml/kg per minute versus 14.9 ± 4.6 mL/kg per minute (NS); maximum minute ventilation = 49.6 ± 9 L/min versus 46 ± 12 L/min (NS); and respiratory quotient = 1.08 ± 0.15 versus 1.08 ± 0.13 (NS). We conclude that, during a 1-month follow-up period, no difference was found between DDD and dual sensor VVIR (QT and activity) pacing modes in CAVB patients with regard to quality-of-life and Cardiopulmonary performance, though a trend toward an increased sense of well being was noted with the DDD mode.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

Initial Experience with a New Algorithm for Automatic Mode Switching from DDDR to DDIR Mode

Implantation of dual chamber devices in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias who require permanent pacemakers may lead to significant complications due to an inappropriately triggered ventricular response. VVI/VVIR units cause loss of AV synchrony in the presence of sinus activity. A new DDDR device (THERA DR, model 7940), with an automatic mode switching (AMS) algorithm, was evaluated. When the mean atrial rate is > 182 beats/min, atrial tachyarrhythmia is detected, and AMS is activated. Twenty-three patients (12 males, mean age 71 ± 7 years) underwent implantation of a THERA DDDR device with the AMS algorithm. Seventeen patients had AV block and/ or sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and atrial arrhythmias, and 6 patients (2 with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) had SSS and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The follow-up period was from 1–9 months. During follow-up, Holter monitoring and treadmill tests were performed. Results : Eighty-seven episodes of AMS were recorded. Telemetered AMS recordings demonstrated episodes in which the DDDR mode switched to the DDIR mode in the presence of PAF, and reverted to DDDR when sinus rhythm returned. Paroxysmal supraventricuiar arrhythmias with a heart rate < 182 beats/min did not activate tbe mode switch. Conclusions : This early, short-term clinical experience with a DDDR device capable of AMS from DDDR to DDIR demonstrated appropriate clinical function and response to PAF. These preliminary results suggest that DDDR pacemakers with AMS to DDIR may significantly extend the current indications for dual chamber pacing.     

Intrapatient Comparison Between Chronic VVIR and DDD Pacing 'In Patients Affected by High Degree AV Block Without Heart Failure

MENOZZI, C., ET AL.: Intrapatient Comparison Between Chronic VVIR and DDD Pacing in Patients Affected by High Degree AV Block Without Heart Failure. In patients affected by high degree AV block without preexisting congestive heart failure there is no definite demonstration that DDD pacing gives real clinical advantages in respect to VVIR pacing. We performed an intrapatient, long-term study between the two pacing modes in 14 high degree AV block patients, using the Medtronic Synergyst 7027 dual chamber pacemaker, who could be programmed alternatively in DDD or VVIR mode. After a 4-week run-in period following the pacemaker implant, patients completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study to compare the effect of 6-week period VVIR and DDD pacing on symptoms and cardiovascular parameters. A semiquantitative score scale was used to quantify the symptoms of general well-being, palpitations, dizziness, pulsating sensation in the neck or abdomen, shortness of breath at rest and during effort, chest pain, and NYHA classification. The sum of symptom scores was 10.4 ± 6.7 in VVIR period and 4.6 ± 2.7 in DDD period (p < 0.001); five patients (36%) crossed over early from VVIR to DDD because of intolerable symptoms; overall, eight patients preferred the DDD mode and no one preferred the VVIR. Cardiac output at rest (echo-Doppler method) was 4.7 ± 1.4 versus 5.7 ± 1.6 liter/min (p < 0.01), body weight was 65.9 ± 6.6 versus 64.9 ± 6.1 kg (p < 0.02), atrial natriuretic peptide was 236 ± 112 versus 198 ± 110 pg/mL (p < 0.01), respectively, during VVIR and DDD modes. Effort tolerance was similar with the two modes of pacing (68 ± 15 vs 70 ± 18 watt/min). In conclusion, hemodynamic advantages of atrial synchronization reflect a better quality of life for the patients even if an individual variability exists.     

Optimal cardiac pacing after heart transplantation

The transplanted heart is characterized physiologically by autonomic denervation, chronotropic incompetence, intermittent episodes of allograft rejection, and frequently by diastolic dysfunction. Sinus node dysfunction resulting in bradycardia is common in the early postoperative period following standard orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Bradycardia tends to remit spontaneously but there are no factors that accurately identify patients who will need long-term pacing. Patients in whom bradycardia persists beyond the second postoperative week despite treatment with theophylline require permanent pacemaker implantation. It has been observed that chronotropic incompetence and diastolic dysfunction are important determinants of exercise capacity following heart transplantation. Pacing that restores chronotropic competence improves exercise capacity, confirming the importance of impaired heart rate response. As in other settings, pacing that preserves atrioventricular (AV) synchrony results in increased cardiac output. For these reasons when pacing is necessary we recommend the DDDR mode (AAIR if intact AV nodal conduction is present) so that the 30%-50% of patients who remain pacemaker-dependent long-term obtain maximal benefit from their transplant.     

Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics

It has been shown that dual chamber pacing with preservation of AV synchrony (DDD) is superior to fixed rate ventricular (VVI) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes, as evaluated by ventilatory response to exercise. Previous studies have focused on the benefits of maintained AV synchrony at maximal exercise. However, there are limited data comparing O2 kinetics in different pacing modes during low intensity exercise, representing the majority of daily activities. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of different pacing modes using O2 kinetics during low intensity exercise. Nineteen patients (age 61 +/- 18 years) with complete AV block underwent low intensity treadmill exercise (35 W) with simultaneous evaluation of symptoms and O2 kinetics in three pacing modes. The first test was performed in DDD mode followed by a second test in VVIR mode with a programmed heart rate corresponding to the sinus rate during the first test. After 6 minutes of each test, the mode was switched from DDD to VVIR and vice versa. The third test was performed in VVI mode at 70 beats/min. O2 kinetics were defined as O2 deficit (time [rest to steady state] x delta VO2-sigma VO2 [rest to steady state]) and mean response time (MRT) of oxygen consumption (O2 deficit/delta VO2). The O2 deficit was 551 +/- 134 mL in DDD pacing, 634 +/- 139 mL in VVIR pacing, and 648 +/- 179 mL in VVI pacing (P = 0.001). MRT was 49 +/- 7.8 seconds in DDD pacing, 54.7 +/- 9.5 seconds in VVIR pacing, and 57.4 +/- 11.0 seconds in VVI pacing (P = 0.002). Ten (53%) patients developed symptoms during switch from DDD to VVIR mode whereas the switch from VVIR to DDD mode was not perceived by any patient (P < 0.001). In conclusion, our study shows an impact of AV synchronous pacing and heart rate adaptation on O2 kinetics during low intensity exercise that correspond to casual daily life activities. Our observations may have clinical implications for the management of patients with complete AV block.     

Rate Augmentation and Atrial Arrhythmias in DDDR Pacing

SPENCER, W.H., ET AL.: Rate Augmentation and Atrial Arrhythmias in DDDR Pacing. Dual chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers provide the capability of augmenting the heart rate of patients with chronotropic incompetence but also may cause atrial arrhythmias because of high rate, competitive atrial pacing. We studied ten patients with two consecutive 24-hour Holter monitors during which they were alternately programmed to either DDD or DDDR pacing in random order. Maximum heart rates (max HR) were measured at every 15-minute interval during each 24-hour period. DDDR pacing showed rate augmentation, 80 ± 7 average max HR when compared with DDD pacing, average max HR 76 ± 5. These results were even more striking when waking hours (7 am to 10 pm) were compared: average max HR 86 ± 7 DDDR versus 78 ± 4 average max HR DDD. Several patients showed marked rate augmentation. Seven of ten patients preferred DDDR pacing over DDD pacing. In the entire population, DDDR pacing did not result in an increased number of atrial arrhythmias (1.25 atrial events 124 hour) when compared to DDD pacing (1.75 atrial events/ 24 hour). We conclude that DDDR pacing provides heart rate augmentation during daily life in a clinical population while not resulting in a significant increase in atrial arrhythmias. (PACE, Vol. 13, December, Part 11, 1990)     

Undesirable Mode Switching with a Dual Chamher Rate Responsive Pacemaker

The Telectronics 1250 Meta MV DDDR pacemaker is a new device featuring automatic mode switching from DDDH to VVIR pacing in the event of an atrial arrhythmia. Although mode switching is a valuable feature, sinus tachycardia can cause an undesirable mode switch to occur. Of 24 implants at this institution, 11 have been for an AV conduction disorder. Eight of these 11 patients were specificalJy evaiuated for undesirable mode switching. During exercise testing and/or Holter monitoring, mode switching was repeatediy seen in seven of the eight at low levels of exercise. Factors precipitating mode switching were a low rate response factor, low upper rate setting, long base postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) and a long AV delay. During Holter monitoring, patients spent up to 50% of the time in VVIR pacing as opposed to DDDR pacing. It is concluded that patients with intact sinus node function are at risk of undesirable mode switching and should probably be programmed to the DDD mode unless there is a specific indication for DDDR pacing. If the DDDR mode is chosen, careful selection of the aforementioned pacing parameters is required.