Comparison of the validity of periodontal probing measurements in smokers and non-smokers

AIM: To determine whether the reduced inflammation and bleeding and increased fibrosis reported in tobacco smokers affect the validity of clinical probing measurements by altering probe tip penetration. METHOD: A constant force probe was used to measure probing depths and sound bone levels at six sites on 64 molar teeth (384 sites) in 20 smoking and 20 non-smoking patients from grooves made with a bur at the gingival margin prior to extraction. Connective tissue attachment levels were measured from the grooves with a dissecting microscope following extraction. Data were analysed using robust regression with sites clustered within subjects. RESULTS: Sites in smokers showed more calculus but less bleeding than sites in non-smokers (p<0.05). The mean clinical probing depth was not significantly different (smokers: 5.54 mm, confidence intervals=4.81 to 6.28; non-smokers: 6.05 mm, ci=5.38 to 6.72). The corresponding post-extraction pocket depth measurements (smokers: 4.95 mm, ci=4.30 to 5.61; non-smokers: 5.23 mm, ci=4.49 to 5.96) were less than clinical probing depth in sites from both smokers and non-smokers (p<0.01). However, the proportional difference was less in smokers (p<0.05), particularly in deeper pockets, indicating that clinical probe tip penetration of tissue was greater in non-smokers. Regression analysis indicated that the presence of calculus and bleeding also influenced the difference in clinical probe penetration (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Clinical probing depth at molar sites exaggerates pocket depth, but the probe tip may be closer to the actual attachment level in smokers due to less penetration of tissue. This may be partly explained by the reduced inflammation and width of supra-bony connective tissue in smokers. These findings have clinical relevance to the successful management of periodontal patients who smoke.     

Periodontal probing depth and subgingival temperature in smokers and non-smokers

Abstract . The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in subgingival temperature between smokers and non-smokers at different probing depths, and the effect of probing depth on subgingival temperature for smokers and non-smokers. 20 smokers and 20 non-smokers, with adult periodontitis, and retained upper anterior teeth were included. Initially sublingual temperatures were recorded, followed by subgingival temperature, pocket probing depth, and bleeding upon probing measurements at 3 buccal points at probing depths of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm for each of the anterior teeth. Sublingual temperatures were consistently higher than subgingival temperatures. The subgingival temperature measurements of pockets which bled upon probing, were subtracted from the sublingual temperature to produce temperature differentials ( DT ), independent of individual body temperature, that were compared between smokers and non-smokers. The relationship between probing depth and DT was examined in, and between, smokers and nonsmokers for bleeding sites. DT was found to decrease linearly with the increase of probing depth, suggesting a subsequent increase of subgingival temperature. Smokers were found to have significantly increased DT (suggesting lower subgingival temperatures) compared to non-smokers, at probing depths of 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm. The differences in DT for sites 6 mm in depth were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. It is concluded that for maxillary buccal anterior sites, there is a decrease of temperature differentials with an increase of probing depth at bleeding sites for both smokers and non-smokers. Smokers had higher temperature differentials compared to non-smokers, at probing depths of 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm.     

Periodontitis in smokers and non-smokers: intra-oral distribution of pockets

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to establish retrospectively whether the disease severity differs between smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: The study population consisted of 183 periodontitis patients, 79 smokers and 104 non-smokers. These subjects had been referred by general dentists to the Clinic for Periodontology, Utrecht, because of periodontal problems and were selected on the basis of the clinical diagnosis: adult periodontitis. The proportion of bleeding sites and the intra-oral distribution of probing pocket depth was evaluated. RESULTS: No statistically-significant differences between smokers (SM) and non-smokers (NSM) were found regarding the mean % of sites that bled upon probing (SM=76%, NSM=72%). Overall differences in the prevalence of probing depths > or =5 mm between smokers and non-smokers were found (SM=44%, NSM=34%). The proportion of sites with a probing pocket depth of > or =5 mm was consistently higher in smokers in the anterior, premolar and molar regions. The data also show that in the upper jaw at the anterior and premolar teeth, the largest differences are found between smokers and non-smokers. Smokers have more sites with a pocket depth > or =5 mm, especially on the lingual surfaces of these teeth. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that cigarette smoking is a factor associated with deeper periodontal pockets and an intra-oral distribution that is suggestive of a local effect.     

Tobacco smoking and periodontal health in a Saudi Arabian population

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the association between tobacco smoking, in particular water pipe smoking, and periodontal health. METHODS: A total of 262 citizens of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in the age range from 17 to 60 years volunteered to participate in the study. The clinical examinations were carried out at King Faisal Specialty Hospital and Research Center in Jeddah and included assessments of oral hygiene, gingival inflammation, and probing depth. Smoking behavior was registered through a questionnaire and confirmed by an interview. Participants were stratified into water pipe smokers (31%), cigarette smokers (19%), mixed smokers (20%), and non-smokers (30%). RESULTS: The mean probing depth per person was 3.1 mm for water pipe smokers, 3.0 mm for cigarette smokers, 2.8 mm for mixed smokers, and 2.3 mm for non-smokers. The association between smoking and probing depth was statistically significant controlling for age (P <0.001). The association between lifetime smoking exposure and mean probing depth was statistically significant in water pipe as well as cigarette smokers controlling for age (P <0.001). Using multivariate analysis, besides smoking, the gingival and plaque indexes were associated with increased probing depth. The prevalence of periodontal disease defined as a minimum of 10 sites with a probing depth > or =5 mm was 19.5% in the total population, 30% in water pipe smokers, 24% in cigarette smokers, and 8% in non-smokers. The prevalence was significantly greater in water pipe and cigarette smokers compared to non-smokers (P <0.001). The relative risk for periodontal disease increased by 5.1- and 3.8-fold in water pipe and cigarette smokers, respectively, compared to non-smokers (P <0.001 and P <0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An association was observed between water pipe smoking and periodontal disease manifestations in terms of probing depth measurements. The impact of water pipe smoking was of largely the same magnitude as that of cigarette smoking.     

Effect of smoking on periodontal health in molar teeth

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that the primary cause of periodontitis is bacterial infection of long duration. In addition, there are several risk factors that may increase the probability and severity of periodontitis. For example, an increased breakdown of alveolar bone has been observed in smokers compared to never-smokers. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between cigarette smoking and periodontal health, in particular, furcation involvement in molar teeth. METHODS: One hundred twenty (120) adult regular dental patients, presenting with at least 20 teeth each, third molars excluded, were evaluated. Sixty of the subjects consumed an average (+/- SD) of 16.8 +/- 3.8 cigarettes daily and had smoked for 21.4 +/- 5.7 years. The remaining subjects presented a negative history of smoking. Periodontal conditions for the molar teeth were recorded at the first and second mandibular molar buccal furcation area. RESULTS: Oral hygiene standards and dental care habits did not differ notably between smokers and never-smokers. Smokers exhibited significantly fewer molar teeth than never-smokers (2.2 +/- 1.1 versus 3.0 +/- 0.8; P<0.01). Also, smokers exhibited significantly advanced gingival recession, probing depth, clinical attachment loss, furcation involvement, and tooth mobility compared to never-smokers (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that long-term cigarette smoking significantly worsens periodontal health including degree and incidence of furcation involvement in molar teeth.     

Clinical and microbiological effect of scaling and root planing in smoker and non-smoker chronic and aggressive periodontitis patients

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical and microbiological parameters at selected sites in smoker and non-smoker chronic and generalized aggressive periodontitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical parameters including probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), and bleeding upon probing (BOP), and subgingival plaque samples were taken from four sites in 28 chronic periodontitis (CP) and 17 generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP) patients before and after SRP. Polymerase chain reaction assays were used to determine the presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythensis, Prevotella intermedia and Treponema denticola. RESULTS: Both CP and GAgP non-smokers had significantly greater reduction in pocket depth (1.0+/-1.3 mm in CP smokers versus 1.7+/-1.4 mm in non-smokers, p=0.007 and 1.3+/-1.0 in GAgP smokers versus 2.4+/-1.2 mm in GAgP non-smokers, p<0.001) than respective non-smokers, with a significant decrease in Tannerella forsythensis in CP sites (smokers 25% increase and non-smokers 36.3% decrease, p<0.001) and Prevotella intermedia at GAgP sites (smokers 25% reduction versus 46.9% in non-smokers, p=0.028). CONCLUSION: SRP was effective in reducing clinical parameters in both groups. The inferior improvement in PD following therapy for smokers may reflect the systemic effects of smoking on the host response and the healing process. The lesser reduction in microflora and greater post-therapy prevalence of organisms may reflect the deeper pockets seen in smokers and poorer clearance of the organisms. These detrimental consequences for smokers appear consistent in both aggressive and CP.     

Antimicrobial irrigation of periodontal furcation lesions to supplement oral hygiene instruction and root debridement

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of subgingival irrigations with tetracycline as a supplement to mechanical plaque control and root debridement on clinical conditions of periodontal furcation pockets. 20 subjects with molar teeth having furcation pockets of varying depths and different grades of furcation involvement served for the study. Following oral hygiene instruction and root debridement at baseline, test teeth were irrigated subgingivally by a professional with a solution of 50 mg/ml of tetracycline, and control teeth with saline every 2nd week for 3 months. Records of dental plaque, bleeding on probing, probing depth and probing attachment level were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The results failed to demonstrate any significant differences between test and control teeth for any of the subgroups of furcation sites at any observation interval. It is suggested that future studies may need to be performed over longer periods of time, and that the antimicrobial agents may need to be administered in vehicles, which provide prolonged periods of active subgingival concentrations.     

牙周内窥镜辅助超声龈下刮治对残留牙周袋临床疗效的评价研究

目的 评价牙周内窥镜下超声龈下刮治对牙周基础治疗后残留牙周袋的临床治疗效果.方法 收集20例慢性牙周炎患者259颗经牙周基础治疗后仍残留深牙周袋的患牙,行牙周内窥镜下超声龈下刮治,比较治疗前及治疗后3个月全口牙周探诊出血(BOP)和牙周探诊深度(PD)的变化.结果 内窥镜治疗后3个月全口平均PD值和BOP位点百分比有显著改善(P<0.001).单根牙和多根牙的平均PD均显著降低(P<0.001),PD≥5mm位点百分比显著改善(P<0.05),其中重度牙周袋位点的改善更明显(P<0.05).根分叉病变位点百分比治疗前后无明显变化.结论 残留牙周深袋经牙周内窥镜辅助超声龈下刮治后,单根牙和多根牙都有显著治疗效果,并且单根牙重度牙周袋位点改善更明显,但是多根牙II度及以上根分叉病变位点的改善有限.     

Investigation of periodontal destruction patterns in smokers and non-smokers

BACKGROUND: Previous work has suggested that tobacco smoking has a local as well as a systemic effect on the severity of periodontal disease. Objective: To test the hypothesis that smokers have more disease in the upper anterior region. METHODS: A retrospective stratified random sample of 49 non-smokers and 39 heavy smokers (>or=20 cigarettes/day) was obtained from a total of 3678 referred patients with adult periodontitis. Probing depth data were collected from clinical records and radiographic measurements were carried out on existing dental panoramic tomographs to assess the inter-proximal bone levels. RESULTS: The proportion of sites with "bone loss" 4.5 mm or greater was higher in smokers, the greatest difference being observed in upper anterior sites (smokers: 73.3+/-25.5%, non-smokers: 48.3+/-31.2%, p<0.001). A difference was also observed when the number of palatal sites probing 4 mm or greater in the upper anterior region was expressed as a proportion of all such sites in the mouth (smokers: 12.3+/-6.8%, non-smokers: 9.8+/-8.8%; p=0.050). CONCLUSION: The overall pattern of tissue destruction was consistent with a systemic effect of smoking. The suggestion of a marginal local effect of the smoking habit in maxillary anterior palatal sites requires further investigation.     

Cigarette smoking, salivary/gingival crevicular fluid cotinine and periodontal status. A 10-year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND, AIMS: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the association of salivary and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) cotinine levels with periodontal disease status in smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: 147 male smokers and 30 male non-smokers were included in the current longitudinal study. The 177 individuals were part of a group of 200 subjects (89%) seen 10 years previously for a baseline survey. Oral hygiene indices, probing depth and attachment loss were recorded. Salivary and GCF cotinine levels of 58 smokers were determined by means of ELISA. RESULTS: Results indicated that no significant difference was found in subjects who smoked, when compared to subjects who did not smoke with respect to plaque accumulation and calculus deposits. Smokers, however, had fewer gingival bleeding sites. Cigarette smoking was associated with a greater increase in probing depth and attachment loss, as well as greater tooth loss at an earlier age. There was greater tooth loss in smokers than non-smokers (p < 0.001). 11 smokers became edentulous, while only 1 non-smoker lost all his teeth within 10 years. The degree of periodontal tissue breakdown was different in each age group with greater periodontal deterioration as age increased. All smokers had detectable salivary and GCF cotinine. Mean GCF cotinine was about 4x higher than mean salivary cotinine levels. Individuals who smoked > or = 20 pack years when compared to <20 pack years, had significantly higher saliva and GCF cotinine levels (p < or = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Neither salivary cotinine nor GCF cotinine was significantly correlated with probing depth, attachment loss and tooth loss (p > 0.05).     

Relationship of cigarette smoking to attachment level profiles

OBJECTIVES: The present investigation examined clinical features of periodontal disease and patterns of attachment loss in adult periodontitis subjects who were current, past or never smokers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 289 adult periodontitis subjects ranging in age from 20-86 years with at least 20 teeth and at least 4 sites with pocket depth and/or attachment level >4 mm were recruited. Smoking history was obtained using a questionnaire. Measures of plaque accumulation, overt gingivitis, bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing pocket depth and probing attachment level were taken at 6 sites per tooth at all teeth excluding 3rd molars at a baseline visit. Subjects were subset according to smoking history into never, past and current smokers and for certain analyses into age categories <41, 41-49, >49. Uni- and multi-variate analyses examined associations between smoking category, age and clinical parameters. RESULTS: Current smokers had significantly more attachment loss, missing teeth, deeper pockets and fewer sites exhibiting bleeding on probing than past or never smokers. Current smokers had greater attachment loss than past or never smokers whether the subjects had mild, moderate or severe initial attachment loss. Increasing age and smoking status were independently significantly related to mean attachment level and the effect of these parameters was additive. Mean attachment level in non smokers <41 years and current smokers >49 years was 2.49 and 4.10 mm respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression indicated that age, pack years and being a current smoker were strongly associated with mean attachment level. Full mouth attachment level profiles indicated that smokers had more attachment loss than never smokers particularly at maxillary lingual sites and at lower anterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: In accord with other studies, smokers had evidence of more severe periodontal disease than past or never smokers. At all levels of mean attachment loss, smokers exhibited more disease than never smokers. Difference in mean attachment level between smokers and never smokers at individual sites was not uniform. Significantly more loss was observed at maxillary lingual sites and lower anterior teeth suggesting the possibility of a local effect of cigarette smoking.     

Long-term effects of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. I: recurrence of pockets, bleeding on probing and tooth loss

BACKGROUND: Periodontal surgery is indicated in the treatment of persistent pockets following cause-related therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. METHODS: Three-hundred and four consecutive patients were identified and retrospectively examined while presenting for a supportive periodontal care (SPC) appointment (T2). All had received non-surgical periodontal treatment and osseous resective surgery as needed, to obtain no sites with probing depth (PD) >3 mm before being enrolled in the SPC programme. The mean SPC duration for the patients was 7.8+/-3.2 years while the mean interval of SPC was 3.4+/-0.8 months. RESULTS: During SPC, a total of 67 teeth had been removed (0.9%). At T2, mean full-mouth plaque scores (FMPS) was 13+/-11.3% and full-mouth bleeding scores (FMBS) was 2+/-3%. In 98.5% of the sites, PD was minimal (or=6 mm was 68 and limited to 41 patients (13.8% of sample). Initial periodontal diagnosis of severe periodontitis, smoking habits, FMBS, number of teeth at completion of active periodontal therapy (T1), number of surgically treated teeth, number of teeth with furcation involvement and number of multi-rooted teeth were associated with the number of pockets at T2. A total of 598 sites (2.1%) displayed bleeding on probing (BOP) at T2. The odds ratio of sites 4 mm or deeper to be BOP positive was 32.9 compared with sites of <3 mm depth. Gender, FMBS, FMPS, furcation involvements and overall number of pockets were associated with the number of bleeding pockets at T2. CONCLUSION: Shallow PDs achieved by treatment of the persistent pockets by fibre retention osseous resective surgery can be maintained over time. These patients displayed minimal gingival inflammation and tooth loss during SPC.     

Subgingival temperature in smokers and non-smokers with periodontal disease

Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare subgingival temperature in a group of smokers to that of a group of non-smokers with similar levels of periodontal disease. 40 adult subjects. 20 cigarette smokers and 20 non-smokers with evidence of adult periodontitis were examined. Subgingival temperature was measured at 6 sites around each of 4 maxillary anterior teeth. Probing depth, and the presence or absence of bleeding was also recorded. In addition, the sublingual temperature was recorded. All sites were classified as diseased or healthy. Healthy sites did not bleed and had a probing depth of ≥ 4mm. diseased sites were any site which had a probing depth ≥ 5 mm. or which bled on probing. Mean sublingual and site temperatures were calculated for smokers and non-smokers. Mean temperature differentials (ΔT) between the sublingual temperature and the site temperature were calculated for each site. Smokers had a warmer mean sublingual temperature than non-smokers. A significant difference in subgingival site temperature was demonstrated between the smokers and non-smokers, with the mean site temperature being 0.4°C warmer in smokers (p < 0.01). When healthy or diseased sites were compared between smokers and non-smokers, smokers also had warmer mean site temperatures than non-smokers for both healthy and diseased sites (p < 0.01). When the mean temperature differentials (ΔT) between healthy and diseased sites were compared across each group, significant differences were also found. For healthy sites, the smokers had a mean ΔT 0.2°C lower (p < 0.01) than the non-smokers, representing warmer sites. In diseased sites however. ΔT was 0.3°C higher (p < 0.01) in smokers, representing cooler sites.     

A clinical study evaluating the treatment of supra-alveolar-type defects with access flap surgery with and without an enamel matrix protein derivative: a pilot study

Aim: There is evidence that regenerative treatment of intra-bony and mandibular class II furcation defects with access flap and an application of an enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) can result in a clinical benefit compared with access flap alone. The aim of this pilot study was to check if the results of access flap surgery in suprabony defects are improved by additional application of EMD.
Material and Methods: Thirty-nine adult subjects with supra-alveolar-type defects were randomly assigned to a test ( n =25) and a control group ( n =14). Seventy teeth were treated with EMD; 28 teeth were treated by access flap. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level and bleeding on probing were evaluated at baseline and after 12 months.
Results: PD of the operated teeth was improved in both groups ( p <0.001 to p =0.041) but always better in the test group. The attachment gain was 2.72±1.80 mm at sites with an initial PD 7 mm in the test group and 0.78±0.62 mm in the control group ( p =0.004). In the test group the mean attachment gain was 0.97±0.92 mm ( p <0.001); the mean reduction of PD was 1.55±0.90 mm ( p <0.001).
Conclusions: The data suggest a significant clinical benefit of supplementary application of EMD during surgical treatment of periodontitis of supra-alveolar pockets, especially in deeper pockets.     

The effect of smoking on the response to periodontal therapy

Abstract This study evaluated the effect of smoking on the clinical response to non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy. 74 adult subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis were treated according to a split-mouth design involving the following treatment modalities: coronal scaling, root planing, modified Widman surgery, and flap with osseous resectional surgery. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth, probing attachment level, horizontal attachment level in furcation sites, recession, presence of supragingival plaque and bleeding on probing. Data were collected: initially, 4 weeks following phase-I therapy, 10 weeks following phase-II therapy and on a yearly basis during 6 years of maintenance care. Data analysis demonstrated that smokers exhibited significantly less reduction of probing depth and less gain of probing attachment level when compared to non-smokers immediately following active therapy and during each of the 6 years of maintenance (p< 0.05). A greater loss of horizontal attachment level was evident in smokers at each yearly exam during maintenance therapy (p < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in recession changes. In general, these findings were true for the outcomes following all 4 modalities of therapy and were most pronounced in the deepest probing depth category (≥ 7 mm). Statistical analysis showed a tendency for smokers to have slightly more supragingival plaque and bleeding on probing. In summary, smokers responded less favorably than non-smokers to periodontal therapy which included 3-month maintenance follow-up.     

Smoking influences decision making in periodontal therapy: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical periodontal therapy consists of a non-surgical course, followed by surgical treatment to eliminate or reduce remaining pathological pockets. Only if diligent mechanical therapy fails are additional measures considered. It has been documented that smoking interferes with the host defense mechanisms. This study addresses the question is meticulous non-surgical periodontal therapy equally successful in smokers and non-smokers? If not, is a thorough and cumbersome non-surgical approach in smokers worth undertaking? METHODS: Thirty-five smokers and 35 non-smokers were selected retrospectively from a pool of 306 patients treated in a private practice over a 17-month period. All had at least 14 teeth present with 8 presenting with gingival pockets > or =6 mm. Non-surgical treatment was performed in 6 to 10 appointments and results were evaluated 6 to 12 weeks after therapy. Bleeding on probing sites with probing depths > or =5 mm were then considered for surgical treatment. RESULTS: Before treatment smokers had statistically significantly higher mean percent of pockets 4 to 5 mm and > or =6 mm (40.36+/-10.65 and 26.51+/-11.95, respectively, compared to 30.38+/-7.57 and 20.42+/-10.03 for non-smokers) and showed significantly lower proportional reduction of these parameters with treatment (50.80+/-33.76 and 81.36+/-19.82 for pocket 4 to 5 mm and 6 mm, compared to 68.43+/-21.23 and 91.7+/-8.92 for nonsmokers). A multivariate analysis gave smoking, plaque control, and initial percent of sites > or =6 mm to be significant predictors of the percent of teeth in need of further therapy. In non-smokers, treatment was apparently successful in all tooth types with the exception of upper first and second molars (28.5% failure) and lower second molar (20% failure). In smokers, rates of further treatment needs were particularly high in the premolar-molar area in both jaws, ranging from 31.4% to 48.5% for an individual tooth type; 42.8% of smokers and 11.5% of non-smokers needed further treatment in 16% of their teeth (pretest probability). A decision analysis showed that for smokers with at least 1 of 5 sites > or =6 mm, one should initiate surgical treatment, rather than first treat non-surgically. If the point of indifference that the decision is correctly set at 95%, the pretest probability should be >12%. There is a higher risk that non-surgical therapy will fail, for instance if we lower the point of indifference to 60%, the pretest probability should be >31%. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that smoking impairs healing after nonsurgical periodontal therapy. The decision analysis of this study questions the need for a thorough course of non-surgical treatment in smokers with advanced periodontal disease.     

Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal healing following GTR in infrabony defects

Abstract This retrospective study examined the effect of cigarette smoking on the healing response following guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in deep infrabony defects. 71 defects in 51 patients underwent GTR with teflon membranes. 20 patients (32 defects) smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day, while 31 patients (39 defects) did not smoke. Clinical measurements were available at baseline, at membrane removal and at the 1-year follow-up. The oral hygiene of both groups was good, but smokers had significantly higher full mouth plaque scores. No significant differences were observed between smokers and non-smokers in terms of % of tissue gained at membrane removal. At the 1-year follow up, however, smokers gained significantly less probing attachment level than non-smokers (2.1 ± 1.2 mm compared with 5.2 ± 1.9 mm). A multivariate model, correcting for the oral hygiene level of the patients and the depth of the infrabony component, indicated that smoking was in itself a significant factor in determining the clinical outcome. A risk-assessment analysis indicated that smokers had a significantly greater risk than non-smokers to display a reduced probing attachment level gain following GTR. It is concluded that cigarette smoking is associated with a reduced healing response after GTR treatment, and may be responsible, at least in part, for the observed results.     

Non-surgical periodontal treatment with and without adjunctive metronidazole in smokers and non-smokers

AIM: To determine whether adjunctive metronidazole therapy would compensate for the poorer treatment response to scaling and root planing reported in smokers. METHOD: A single-blind, randomised clinical trial of 28 smokers and 56 non-smokers, stratified for periodontitis disease severity and randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups: (1) Scaling and root planing using an ultrasonic scaler with local anaesthesia (SRP), (2) SRP+ metronidazole tabs 200 mg tds for 7 days, (3) SRP + 2 subgingival applications of 25% metronidazole gel. Probing depths (PD) and attachment levels (AL) were recorded with a Florida probe at baseline, 2 months and 6 months post treatment by a single examiner who was unaware of the treatment modality. Results were analysed for all sites with baseline probing depths equal to or greater than Florida probe recordings of 4.6 mm using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Reductions in probing depth at 6 months were significantly less (p < 0.001) in the smokers (mean 1.23 mm, 95% confidence intervals = 1.05 to 1.40 mm) than in the non-smokers (1.92, 1.75 to 2.09 mm). Attachment level gains were approximately 0.55 mm and there was no statistically significant difference between smokers and non-smokers. There were no differences in any clinical measure in response to the three treatment regimens at 2 or 6 months for either smokers or non-smokers. A reduction in the proportion of spirochaetes was observed at 6 months which was less in smokers than in non-smokers (p = 0.034). Multiple linear regression analysis on probing depth at 6 months demonstrated that smoking was a significant explanatory factor (p < 0.001) for poor treatment outcome, whilst the presence or absence of adjunctive metronidazole was not (p = 0.620). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that smokers have a poorer treatment response to SRP, regardless of the application of either systemic or locally applied adjunctive metronidazole.     

Cigarette smoking in patients referred for periodontal treatment

369 adult patients with moderate to severe periodontitis were compared with a survey sample from the population of Stockholm regarding smoking habits. The results showed that the frequency of daily cigarette smokers was significantly greater in the periodontitis sample. The odds ratio for a smoker to appear among periodontitis patients was more than doubled as compared to the population at large. In addition, the periodontal variables of PlI, GI, probing depth and the patient's experience of gingival bleeding were recorded and compared between smoking and non-smoking patients. PlI was found to be similar in smokers and non-smokers. Signs and symptoms of gingivitis as evidenced by the patients' experience of gingival bleeding and by GI were less pronounced in patients who smoke. Only 25% of smokers reported bleeding gingiva as compared to 51% of non-smokers. No differences were observed regarding probing depth except for lingual pockets of the maxilla where a significantly greater probing depth was observed in smokers. It was concluded that smokers may run an increased risk for periodontitis. Furthermore, gingival inflammatory symptoms seem to be suppressed in patients who smoke.     

Cigarette smoking in patients referred for periodontal treatment

Abstract — 369 adult patients with moderate to severe periodontitis were compared with a survey sample from the population of Stockholm regarding smoking habits. The results showed that the frequency of daily cigarette smokers was significantly greater in the periodontitis sample. The odds ratio for a smoker to appear among periodontitis patients was more than doubled as compared to the population at large. In addition, the periodontal variables of PII, GI, probing depth and the patient's experience of gingival bleeding were recorded and compared between smoking and non-smoking patients. PII was found to be similar in smokers and non-smokers. Signs and symptoms of gingivitis as evidenced by the patients' experience of gingival bleeding and by GI were less pronounced in patients who smoke. Only 25% of smokers reported bleeding gingiva as compared to 51 % of non-smokers. No differences were observed regarding probing depth except for lingual pockets of the maxilla where a significantly greater probing depth was observed in smokers. It was concluded that smokers may run an increased risk for periodontitis. Furthermore, gingival inflammatory symptoms seem to be suppressed in patients who smoke.