Wenckebach periodicity in single atrioventricular nodal cells from the rabbit heart

Previous studies have suggested that Wenckebach periodicity in cardiac tissues may occur because of discontinuous propagation across junctional areas in which there is high intercellular resistivity or different cell types. Under these conditions, the impulse may stop altogether at a given junction, or may renew its propagation but only after a step delay imposed by the diastolic time-dependent recovery in the excitability of cells distal to that junction. Accordingly, Wenckebach periodicity in the atrioventricular node may be explained in terms of electrotonically mediated delay in the activation of the nodal cells. To test this hypothesis, we have studied recovery of excitability, and susceptibility to rate-dependent activation failure in single myocytes isolated from the adult rabbit atrioventricular node. Recordings were obtained by using the patch technique in the whole-cell, current clamp configuration. Repetitive stimulation of single atrioventricular nodal myocytes with depolarizing current pulses of critical amplitude yielded frequency-dependent stimulus response patterns that ranged from 1:1, through various Wenckebachlike periodicities (e.g., 5:4 and 4:3) to 2:1 and 3:1. Both typical and atypical Wenckebach structures were demonstrated, as well as "complex" patterns (e.g., reverse Wenckebach or alternating Wenckebach) previously ascribed to multiple levels of block. The diastolic recovery of excitability curve, determined by application of repetitive stimuli at cycle lengths that were longer than the action potential duration, showed a monotonic function with a refractory period outlasting the action potential duration (i.e., postrepolarization refractoriness). Abbreviation of the stimulation cycle length to values below those of the action potential duration revealed the existence of a period of supernormal excitability during the repolarizing phase of the action potential. In either case, the stimulus response patterns obtained were a direct consequence of the shape of the recovery of excitability curve. The monotonic portion of the recovery curve was fitted to an empirical equation that when iterated reproduced the stimulus response patterns observed in the atrioventricular nodal cell. Our data demonstrate that recovery of excitability after an action potential is indeed a function of the diastolic interval, and that this slow process sets the conditions for the development of Wenckebach periodicity in the atrioventricular node.     

Electrophysiologic studies on atrioventricular nodal Wenckebach cycles

Wenckebach cycles with a 4:3 ratio, produced by rapid atrial pacing, were studied in 27 anesthetized denervated dogs using programmed stimulation. A test stimulus (S') could be inserted after any preselected beat of the Wenckebach cycle. An on-line computer measured the atrial (A) to His bundle (H) intervals. In all dogs a progressive increase in atrioventricular (A-V) nodal refractoriness was seen in the effective refractory period for each beat and a rightward shift of the A'-H' relative to the A-A' refractory curves. Atypical Wenckebach cycles could be produced by small changes in the basic cycle length. No evidence for reentry was found from the refractory curves of Wenckebach cycles and by interruption of stimulation after the third stimulus of a 4:3 Wenckebach cycle. Analysis of the A'-H' relative to the H-A' refractory curves did not confirm a positive feedback mechanism. In order to mimic a Wenckebach cycle, a blocked premature beat was inserted during stressed 1:1 conduction. The changes in the refractory curves for successive beats after the premature beat were rate-dependent and similar to those in Wenckebach cycles but smaller in magnitude. In Wenckebach cycles there is a progressive increase in refractoriness, caused by cumulative effect similar to that seen after a blocked beat during stressed 1:1 conduction, until block occurs and the cycle resets.     

Alternative mechanisms of apparent supernormal atrioventricular conduction

Alternative mechanisms were found to explain several different electrocardiographic examples of apparent supernormal atrioventricular (A-V) conduction in man using programmed premature atrial and ventricular stimulation and His bundle recordings. Sudden shortening of the P-R interval during A-V nodal Wenckebach phenomenon was due to manifest or concealed reentry within the A-V node. Gap phenomena in which late atrial premature depolarizations blocked while earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted were shown to result from delay of earlier atrial premature depolarizations in the A-V node (type I gap) or in the His-Purkinje system (type II gap). Mechanisms analogous to the latter were found in cases of apparent supernormality of intraventricular conduction: Late atrial premature depolarizations resulted in aberration whereas earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted normally because of delay within the A-V node or His-Purkinje system. Unexpected normalization of a bundle branch block pattern also resulted from Wenckebach phenomenon in the bundle branches. Atypical Wenckebach phenomenon with the first beat of the period demonstrated that aberration was due to phase 4 depolarization. Preexcitation of the ventricle before the delivery of a previously blocked atrial premature depolarization allowed conduction through the area of block (A-V node) because of earlier depolarization of the latter with earlier recovery. In the His-Purkinje system, 2:1 A-V block was converted to 1:1 conduction when a premature ventricular depolarization shortened the refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system.     

Application of the Rosenblueth hypothesis to assess atrioventricular nodal behavior

Based on the Rosenblueth hypothesis, atrioventricular nodal behavior is evaluated using a method involving the coupling interval at the level of the atrioventricular nodal step delay. If the sum of the coupling interval at the level of step delay and the resultant step delay is greater than the atrial coupling interval, Wenckebach periodicity results; if the sum is less than the atrial coupling interval, the reverse Wenckebach phenomenon occurs; and if both are equal, steady state conduction is reached.     

病态窦房结综合征患者房室传导功能分析

为了解病态窦房结综合征患者的房室传导功能,用食管电生理检查观察窦房结功能正常者86例、窦房结功能低下者40例和病态窦房结综合征者109例的房室传导功能.结果显示:3组的文氏型阻滞点、2:1阻滞点差异无显著意义(P>0.05).将窦房结功能障碍者的窦房结恢复时间与文氏型阻滞点、2:1阻滞点作相关分析,结果均无相关性(P>0.05).认为病态窦房结综合征发生房室传导阻滞的概率较低,植入起搏器前应作食管心房调搏检查房室传导系统功能.     

Multilevel block in the atrioventricular node during atrial tachycardia and flutter alternating with Wenckebach phenomenon

The electrocardiograms of 100 patients with rapid and regular PP intervals during atrial arrhythmias (because of atrial tachycardia or flutter, or pacing) were examined for periods of irregular atrioventricular conduction. This irregular conduction corresponds to an alternating Wenckebach phenomenon, of a type that can be determined from simple rules. The different types of conduction encountered in different patients and the changes seen in the same patient suggest that the atrioventricular node functions physiologically with 3 levels of sequential block. The different prevalence of the 2 types of alternating Wenckebach block may reflect functional differences at the level of the atrioventricular node.     

Multilevel block in the atrioventricular node during atrial tachycardia and flutter alternating with Wenckebach phenomenon.

The electrocardiograms of 100 patients with rapid and regular PP intervals during atrial arrhythmias (because of atrial tachycardia or flutter, or pacing) were examined for periods of irregular atrioventricular conduction. This irregular conduction corresponds to an alternating Wenckebach phenomenon, of a type that can be determined from simple rules. The different types of conduction encountered in different patients and the changes seen in the same patient suggest that the atrioventricular node functions physiologically with 3 levels of sequential block. The different prevalence of the 2 types of alternating Wenckebach block may reflect functional differences at the level of the atrioventricular node.     

Reverse alternating Wenckebach periodicity

An atrial pacing-induced reverse conduction pattern of the alternating Wenckebach periodicity was observed in 5 of 42 children (12%) during electrophysiologic study. This conduction pattern is a reverse of the usual alternating Wenckebach periodicity: During an underlying 2:1 atrioventricular conduction block there is progressive shortening of the conduction time of the conducted impulses with termination in a lower degree of block. This reverse alternating Wenckebach periodicity may be caused by a mechanism similar to that in other Wenckebach phenomena.     

Simultaneous anterograde fast-slow atrioventricular nodal pathway conduction after procainamide

Three patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiologic studies that included His bundle recordings, incremental atrial and ventricular pacing and extrastimulation before and after intravenous infusion of 500 mg of procainamide. In all three patients the tachycardia was induced during atrial pacing or premature atrial stimulation, or both. Two of the three patients had discontinuous atrioventricular (A-V) nodal curves with induction of a slow-fast tachycardia during failure in anterograde fast pathway conduction and one patient had a smooth A-V nodal curve with induction of a slow-fast tachycardia at critical A-H interval delays. After procainamide: (1) in all three patients atrial pacing induced A-V nodal Wenckebach periodicity (cycle length 300 to 400 ms) resulting in simultaneous anterograde fast and slow pathway conduction (one atrial beat resulting in two QRS complexes) and retrograde fast pathway conduction initiating an echo response or a slow-fast tachycardia, or both; (2) in all three patients there was enhanced conduction and shortening of refractoriness of the anterograde fast pathway and depressed conduction and lengthening of refractoriness of the retrograde fast pathway; and (3) in two patients there was inability to sustain tachycardia because of selective block within the retrograde fast pathway. In conclusion: (1) procainamide altered conduction and refractoriness of the anterograde fast and slow pathways so that simultaneous conduction could occur during atrial pacing, resulting in a double ventricular response and a slow-fast echo or tachycardia, or both; and (2) the differential effects of procainamide on anterograde fast and retrograde fast pathways suggests two functional A-V nodal fast pathways, one for anterograde and the other for retrograde conduction.     

Mobitz type II suprahisian atrioventricular block : block in the subnodal-suprahisian (NH) zone?

The electrophysiological properties of the atrioventricular node differ from those of the His bundle. Nodal conduction is always decremential; this is its principal physiological characteristic, and accounts for the fact that almost the only form of block found at this level is Wenckebach block. The His bundle is characterised by an all-or-nothing response and usually blocks in the Mobitz II mode. Wenckebach phenomena have been described in the His Purkinje system, but Mobitz II block has not been reported in the atrioventricular node. Similarly, phase IV paradoxical block is found in the His Purkinje system but has not been described in the atrioventricular node in the absence of vagal phenomena. In addition, the atrioventricular node is very sensitive to the influence of the autonomic nervous system, the His bundle much less so. The first patient had a normal resting electrocardiogram showing sinus rhythm; second degree atrioventricular block was observed when the atrial rhythm was increased by exercise, atropine or atrial pacing. His bundle recordings showed the block to be suprahisian; the blocked atrial potentials were not followed by a His potential, whilst the conducted atrial activity was followed by a normal His potential and a normal HV interval. However, this atrioventricular block was of the Mobitz II and not the expected Mobitz I type, conduction to the ventricles suddenly blocking (with a 3/2 or 2/1 response) when the atrial rate was increased, without obvious lengthening of the PR or AH intervals before the blocked atria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Conduction abnormalities detected by electrophysiologic testing following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect

Since 1983 we have performed electrophysiologic studies in 6 patients who had previously undergone repair of an ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect. Information obtained during electrophysiologic studies was crucial in guiding appropriate pacemaker therapy in these patients. As judged from the resting electrocardiogram, sinus or junctional bradycardia was present in 3/6, atrial flutter / fibrillation in 2/6, and paced rhythm in 2 patients who had had ventricular pacemakers implanted for complete atrioventricular block. During maximal exercise testing 4 patients had reduced heart rates; 2 had sudden drops in heart rate at 1 min postexercise; 1 patient had exercise induced ventricular bigeminy; and 1 patient with atrial flutter and 2: 1-4: 1 block at rest developed 1: 1 conduction during Stage II with an effective ventricular rate of 220/min. During electrophysiologic studies, the maximum corrected sinus node recovery time was abnormal in five of the six, ranging from 410 to 5630 msec. There was no spontaneous atrial rhythm in the other patient. Complete atrioventricular block was present in 2 patients while the atrioventricular Wenckebach phenomenon occurred abnormally at atrial pacing cycle lengths greater than 450 msec in 2 others. Supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter/fibrillation, was either spontaneous or induced in 2/6 patients, while ventricular tachycardia was induced in 1/3 patients who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Electrophysiologic studies were important in unmasking severe sinus node disease in 3 patients and atrioventricular node disease in 2. We therefore recommend that electrophysiologic studies be strongly considered as part of the evaluation of conduction abnormalities following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect.     

Unique electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with different ventriculoatrial block patterns: Effects of slow pathway ablation and insights into the location of the reentrant circuit

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic mechanisms of different ventriculoatrial (VA) block patterns during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize AVNRTs with different VA block patterns and to assess the effects of slow pathway ablation. METHODS: Electrophysiologic data from six AVNRT patients with different VA block patterns were reviewed. RESULTS: All AVNRTs were induced after a sudden AH "jump-up" with the earliest retrograde atrial activation at the right superoparaseptum. Different VA block patterns comprised Wenckebach His-atrial (HA) block (n = 4), 2:1 HA block (n = 1), and variable HA conduction times during fixed AVNRT cycle length (CL) (n = 1). Wenckebach HA block during AVNRT was preceded by gradual HA interval prolongation with fixed His-His (HH) interval and unchanged atrial activation sequence. AVNRT with 2:1 HA block was induced after slow pathway ablation for slow-slow AVNRT with 1:1 HA conduction, and earliest atrial activation shifted from right inferoparaseptum to superoparaseptum without change in AVNRT CL. The presence of a lower common pathway was suggested by a longer HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL than during AVNRT (n = 5) or Wenckebach HA block during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL (n = 1). In four patients, HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL was unusually long (188 +/- 30 ms). Ablations at the right inferoparaseptum rendered AVNRT noninducible in 5 (83%) of 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Most AVNRTs with different VA block patterns were amenable to classic slow pathway ablation. The reentrant circuit could be contained within a functionally protected region around the AV node and posterior nodal extensions, and different VA block patterns resulted from variable conduction at tissues extrinsic to the reentrant circuit.     

Luigi Luciani and the earliest graphic demonstration of Wenckebach periodicity

Using an isolated frog heart preparation with ligatures around the atria, Luigi Luciani, an Italian physiologist working in 1873 in Carl Ludwig's famous laboratory in Leipzig, was the first to demonstrate cardiac group beating, which he named periodic rhythm. He attributed this to increased resistance to impulse propagation between the atria and the ventricle. Karel F. Wenckebach, in his 1899 landmark report of group beating in a patient in which he also used pulse tracings, credited Luciani with this discovery. Wenckebach referred to the phenomena as "Luciani periods." With the advent of electrocardiography in the early 20th century, this form of group beating became known as Wenckebach periodicity and then as Mobitz type I atrioventricular block. We reanalyzed Luciani's original paper and pulse tracings, and we show that periodic rhythm does indeed meet the criteria of second-degree atrioventricular block as established by Wenckebach. We also reviewed the career of Luciani, who was an important investigator, outstanding teacher and mentor, and distinguished leader of 19th-century physiology. We conclude that Wenckebach still deserves to have his name eponymously attached to this type of atrioventricular block because he was the first to unravel the complicated relationship between atrial and ventricular conduction.     

伴连续性房室结功能曲线的房室结折返性心动过速的电生理分析

目的：探讨无房室结双径路特性的房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的电生理特点。方法：所有心动过速患射频消融前常规行心内电生理检查。结果：845例射频病人中325例为AVNRT，其中有21例患房室结功能曲线呈连续性，其电生理特征：希氏束图上心房回波(A)先出现，A波落在室波升支或其前，希氏柬不应期内刺激心室，不能提前夺获心房，射频消融后心房刺激时AHmax明显缩短。结论：伴连续性房室结功能曲线的AVNRT患心房刺激不表现房室结双径路的电生理特性，其消融终点初步定为：心房心室S1S1、S1S2刺激不诱发AVNRT；无AHvH传导曲线跳跃；房室结前传不应期明显缩短。     

Double Wenckebach phenomenon in atrioventricular node and His bundle. Electrophysiological demonstration in a case of atrial flutter.

In a case of atrial flutter with a 9:2 atrioventricular response, the only possible way to explain the conduction pattern was 3:1 block in the atrioventicular node (which is 3:2 Wenckebach sequence in the N zone and a 2:1 block at the junction of the node with the bundle of His) plus 3:2 Wenckebach sequence distal to the H deflection. The recording of the His bundle deflection confirmed this analysis.     

A new method for evaluating the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on atrioventricular nodal conduction

Electrophysiological variables were studied in 19 patients before and after one of three commonly used antiarrhythmic agents. The pacing rate at which alternating Wenckebach periods appeared in eight patients was significantly reduced by intravenous digoxin (0.01 mg/kg body weight). The atrioventricular nodal conduction time (A-H interval) and Wenckebach point were not significantly altered by digoxin. Intravenous propranolol (0.1 mg/kg body weight) in four patients did not affect the A-H interval, but it reduced the pacing rates at which the Wenckebach point and alternating Wenckebach periods occurred. Intravenous disopyramide (2 mg/kg body weight) significantly increased the pacing rate required to produce alternating Wenckebach periods but did not significantly alter the other indicators of atrioventricular conduction in seven patients. It is concluded that the pacing rate required to produce alternating Wenckebach periodicity may be a useful and sensitive variable in the evaluation of the effect of antiarrhythmic agents on atrioventricular nodal conduction.     

Implications of marked fatty infiltration around and in the atrophic atrioventricular node in elderly patients with permanent pacemaker implantation for symptomatic sick sinus syndrome

The present study undertook an extensive analysis of the histopathological findings of the atrioventricular conduction system in 14 elderly patients treated with permanent pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Special attention was given to the lowest Wenckebach block points of atrioventricular conduction during rapid atrial pacing, and ventricular rate or duration of ventricular pause during chronic atrial fibrillation. An electrophysiological study (EPS) was conducted under sinus rhythm in 13 patients and under junctional escape rhythm in 1 patient. Three of the 14 cases showed a lower Wenckebach block point of 130 beats/min or less. Two of these 3 cases showed excessive fatty infiltration around the atrionodal junction area and into the atrophic atrioventricular node (AVN) itself. Of the 6 patients who had chronic atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation, 2 cases showed a slow ventricular response of less than 60 beats/min and/or a long ventricular pause of 3.3 s. One of the 2 cases showed a lower Wenckebach block point of 130 beats/min at the time of EPS. The other, who later progressed to idiopathic atriomegaly, also showed marked fatty infiltration around the AVN. This fatty lesion was closely associated with diffuse disruption of the muscular fibers connecting the atrophic AVN with the atrium. In addition, most of the remaining cases also had an atrophic AVN. In conclusion, a sparse or absent atrionodal connection and an atrophic AVN due to excessive fatty infiltration in the atrionodal transitional area should be investigated in atrioventricular conduction disturbances in the elderly with SSS.     

A new method for evaluating the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on atrioventricular nodal conduction.

Electrophysiological variables were studied in 19 patients before and after one of three commonly used antiarrhythmic agents. The pacing rate at which alternating Wenckebach periods appeared in eight patients was significantly reduced by intravenous digoxin (0.01 mg/kg body weight). The atrioventricular nodal conduction time (A-H interval) and Wenckebach point were not significantly altered by digoxin. Intravenous propranolol (0.1 mg/kg body weight) in four patients did not affect the A-H interval, but it reduced the pacing rates at which the Wenckebach point and alternating Wenckebach periods occurred. Intravenous disopyramide (2 mg/kg body weight) significantly increased the pacing rate required to produce alternating Wenckebach periods but did not significantly alter the other indicators of atrioventricular conduction in seven patients. It is concluded that the pacing rate required to produce alternating Wenckebach periodicity may be a useful and sensitive variable in the evaluation of the effect of antiarrhythmic agents on atrioventricular nodal conduction.     

A new mechanism for atrioventricular nodal gap-vagal modulation of conduction

The well-known paradoxic behavior of atrioventricular conduction, the so-called gap phenomenon, that occurs when impulses within a certain range of coupling intervals are blocked while impulses with shorter coupling intervals are conducted is attributed to differences in properties of refractoriness in neighboring regions of the conduction system. In contrast, in the present study a model was developed showing a similar phenomenon, dependent on different electrophysiologic mechanisms and localized within the atrioventricular node in an isolated rabbit heart tissue preparation (n = 11). The hearts were paced at cycle length of 400-500 msec, and atrioventricular nodal conduction times (A2H2) were measured versus atrial extrastimulus (A1A2) coupling intervals by standard extrastimulus techniques. Postganglionic vagal stimulation was applied in the atrioventricular node as short bursts of subthreshold (for myocardium) stimuli with duration of 50-150 msec, amplitude of 20-800 microA, and absolute phase (delay after A1) of 0-500 msec. Vagal bursts with appropriate parameters consistently produced bimodal conduction curves. Initially, gradual shortening of the A1A2 coupling interval was associated with an increasing A2H2, with an accentuated increase (or even atrioventricular block) within an intermediate A1A2 range. However, further shortening of the A1A2 coupling interval produced a decrease in A2H2, which subsequently was followed by a block at the effective refractory period. Microelectrode recordings indicated that this characteristic bimodal pattern of conduction curves, demonstrating a gap, reflected transient vagally induced hyperpolarization in the N region of the node. In those instances where conduction block occurred and gap was manifest, the most marked hyperpolarization coincided with the time of arrival of midcycle premature extrastimuli, whereas the conduction of extrastimuli with either more or less prematurity was under less-marked vagal influence. Thus, this study demonstrates a new electrophysiologic mechanism producing anomalous conduction curves and the gap phenomenon within the atrioventricular node based on vagal-induced nonuniform recovery of diastolic excitability.