Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block

PURPOSE: To study the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by atracurium and cisatracurium. METHODS: One hundred and twenty eight, ASA group 1 or 2 adults were given either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) atracurium or 0.1 mg x kg(-1) cisatracurium during fentanyl-thiopental-nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. The neuromuscular block was measured by an acceleration-responsive transducer. Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in the first twitch (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) response. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg x kg(-1)) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg x kg(-1)) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another sixteen subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. RESULTS: At five minutes, unlike edrophonium, neostigmine was equally effective against atracurium and cisatracurium with respect to T1 recovery. The neostigmine T1-ED50 was 10.3 +/- 1.06 (SEM) microg x kg(-1) after atracurium and 11.2 +/- 1.06) microg x kg(-1) after cisatracurium. The edrophonium ED50 was 157 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with atracurium and 47.4 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with cisatracurium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 15.2 +/- 1.7 and 4.2 +/- 0.41 (P < 0.001) for atracurium and cisatracurium, respectively. At 10 min neostigmine was 13 +/- 1.4 times as potent as edrophonium for achieving 50% TOF recovery after atracurium paralysis. After cisatracurium the potency ratio was 11.8 +/- 1.3 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences at five minutes, neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios at 10 min, were similar in both relaxants studied.     

Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade still often relies on clinical judgement. Moreover, there are substantial national differences in the use of agents to 'reverse' their effects. We investigated the recovery characteristics and incidence of postoperative residual curarization after cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions for long duration interventions without systematic antagonism. METHODS: In 30 patients undergoing major surgery, we measured infusion dose requirements for rocuronium and cisatracurium during propofol anaesthesia. Infusions were discontinued at the beginning of surgical closure; spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function was awaited in both groups. Neostigmine (50 microg kg(-1)) was administered only when a patient started to wake without a train-of-four ratio (TOF) of 0.9. RESULTS: In the cisatracurium and rocuronium groups, four (27%) and one (7%) patients, respectively, had a TOF ratio > or = 0.9 at the end of surgery. The TOF ratio in each group at that time was 51 +/- 32% for cisatracurium and 47 +/- 31% for rocuronium (P = 0.78). Six patients (40%) in the cisatracurium group and seven (47%) in the rocuronium group required neostigmine. The TOF ratio at the time of reversal was 63 +/- 7% for cisatracurium and 40 +/- 19% for rocuronium (P = 0.01). The time interval between the end of surgery and a TOF ratio of 0.9 was 10 +/- 9 min for cisatracurium and 18 +/- 13 min for rocuronium (P = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving a cisatracurium or rocuronium infusion have a high incidence of postoperative residual curarization when the block is not antagonized. When 'reversal' is not attempted, cisatracurium seems to be safer than rocuronium.     

Reversal of rapacuronium block during propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia

We studied the antagonism of rapacuronium with edrophonium-atropine during propofol- or sevoflurane- based anesthesia in 60 healthy outpatients. After the induction of anesthesia with standardized doses of propofol and fentanyl, rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Patients were randomized to receive either a propofol infusion (100 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) or sevoflurane (1.0%, end-tidal) in combination with nitrous oxide 66% for maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular block was monitored by using electromyography at the wrist and reversed with edrophonium 1.0 mg/kg and atropine 0.015 mg/kg when the first twitch (T(1)) response of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation recovered to 25% of the baseline value. The clinical duration of action (i.e., time to 25% T(1) recovery) was similar during both propofol (13.1 +/- 3.6 min) and sevoflu-rane (13.7 +/- 4.4 min) anesthesia. The time from 25% T(1) recovery to TOF ratio of 0.8 was also similar with propofol (3.4 +/- 2.1 min) and sevoflurane (5.9 +/- 8.7 min) (P > 0.05). Although none of the patients in the propofol group required more than 9 min to achieve a TOF ratio of 0. 8, two patients receiving sevoflurane required 31 min and 37 min. Adequate antagonism of rapacuronium block with edrophonium can be achieved within 10 min during propofol anesthesia. However, more prolonged recovery may occur in the presence of sevoflurane. Implications: We studied the reversal of rapacuronium-induced block with edrophonium and found that the residual rapacuronium block can be readily antagonized during propofol-based anesthesia. However, reversal of rapacuronium appears to be less predictable during sevoflurane-based anesthesia.     

Early and late reversal of rocuronium with pyridostigmine during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children

This study investigated the effect of pyridostigmine administered at different levels of recovery of neuromuscular function after rocuronium during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Fifty-one patients aged 3 to 10 years, ASA physical status 1 or 2 were randomized to 4 groups: a spontaneous recovery group; or, reversal with pyridostigmine 0.25 mg/kg with glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg at one of three times: 5 minutes after rocuronium administration; at 1% twitch height (T1) recovery; or at a 25% twitch height (T25) recovery. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone (5-7 mg/kg) and maintained with 2-3% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide. Atropine (0.015 mg/kg) and, after calibrating the TOF-Watch, rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) were then administered. Maximal block occurred 1.1+/-0.5 min (mean, SD) after rocuronium administration. In the spontaneous recovery group, the clinical duration (recovery to T25) was 40.1+/-8.8 min and the recovery index (time between T25 and T75) 19.9+/-9.8 min. Recovery to TOF >0.9 from the time of rocuronium administration was reduced by approximately 30% in the pyridostigmine groups compared to the spontaneous recovery group. There was no significant difference among the three pyridostigmine groups. When pyridostigmine was given at T1 or T25, the time from pyridostigmine administration to TOF >0.9 was shorter than for the group receiving pyridostigmine 5 minutes after rocuronium.     

Influence of neostigmine on the course of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or cisatracurium: a randomized, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the time-course of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or cisatracurium during intravenous anesthesia, in terms of both the time to spontaneous recovery or time to reversal after administration of neostigmine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients classified as ASA 1-2 were randomized to receive blinded administration of a single injection of twice the 95% effective dose of rocuronium or cisatracurium for general anesthesia, and then neostigmine plus atropine at recovery of the first train-of-4 (TOF) twitch at 5% or 25%, or normal saline solution as placebo at recovery of the first TOF twitch at 25%. The neuromuscular blockade was monitored by acceleromyography. Intergroup comparisons were carried out by Student t test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Mean (SD) time to onset was faster with rocuronium at (1.04 [0.32] minutes) compared with cisatracurium at (2.58 [0.81] minutes) and duration was shorter: time to the first twich at 5% was 30 (6.4) minutes with rocuronium and 38.1 (9.7) minutes with cisatracurium. The total duration of blockade (time to the 80% TOF ratio) was also shorter with rocuronium when the neuromuscular blockade was reversed, but there were no differences in the time to block reversal when neostigmine was not used: 62 (18.9) minutes to recovery from the rocuronium blockade vs 66.96 (15.9) minutes to recover from a cisatracurium blockade. A high percentage of patients had less than an 80% TOF ratio at 60 and 90 minutes of administration of the neuromuscular blockerswhen reversal was not used (patients receiving rocuronium, 60% at 60 minutes, and 20% at 90 minutes; patients receiving cisatracurium, 80% at 60 minutes, and 40% at 90 minutes). CONCLUSION: Not antagonizing a rocuronium- or cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade in surgical procedures lasting less than 90 minutes can lead to a high percentaje of residual blockade (TOF ratio <80%).     

Antagonism of cisatracurium and rocuronium block at a tactile train-of-four count of 2: should quantitative assessment of neuromuscular function be mandatory?

With a train-of-four (TOF) ratio >0.70 as the standard of acceptable recovery, postoperative residual paralysis is a frequent occurrence in postanesthesia care units (PACUs). However, detailed information regarding prior anesthetic management is rarely provided. We examined the incidence of postoperative weakness after the administration of cisatracurium and rocuronium when using a rigid protocol for muscle relaxant and subsequent neostigmine administration. Under desflurane, N(2)O, and opioid anesthesia, tracheal intubation was accomplished after either cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.60 mg/kg. The response of the thumb to ulnar nerve stimulation was estimated by palpation. Additional increments of muscle relaxant were given as needed to maintain the TOF count at 1 or 2. At the conclusion of surgery, at a TOF count of 2, neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg plus glycopyrrolate 10 micro g/kg was administered. The mechanical TOF response was then measured with a force transducer starting 5 min postreversal. Patients were observed until a TOF ratio of 0.90 was achieved. There were no significant differences in the recovery profiles of cisatracurium versus rocuronium. TOF ratios at 10 min postreversal were 0.72 +/- 0.10 and 0.76 +/- 0.11, respectively. At 15 min postreversal, only one subject in each group had a TOF ratio of <0.70. No patient in either group arrived in the PACU with a TOF ratio <0.70. Our results suggest that if cisatracurium or rocuronium is administered by using the TOF count as a guide, critical episodes of postoperative weakness in the PACU should be an infrequent occurrence. IMPLICATIONS: After the administration of cisatracurium or rocuronium, train-of-four (TOF) ratios <0.70 should rarely be observed in the postanesthesia care unit if neostigmine-assisted antagonism of residual block is delayed until the tactile TOF count at the thumb is 2 or more.     

Equi-lasting doses of rocuronium, compared to mivacurium, result in improved neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy

PURPOSE: To compare equi-lasting doses of a short-acting (mivacurium) to an intermediate-acting (rocuronium) neuromuscular relaxant, with regard to intubating conditions, efficacy, number of maintenance doses, hemodynamic alterations, adverse events and costs, in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.2 mg*kg(-1) (3 x ED(95)) mivacurium or 0.5 mg*kg(-1) (1.7 x ED(95)) rocuronium, under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia. T1, first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF) and TOF ratio (T4:T1) were used to evaluate neuromuscular block using the Relaxometer(R) mechanomyograph. The trachea was intubated when T1 was maximally suppressed. Neuromuscular block was maintained at 25% T1 with equi-lasting doses of 0.075 mg*kg(-1) mivacurium or 0.15 mg*kg(-1) rocuronium. RESULTS: Mean (min) +/- SD mivacurium onset time (1.9 +/- 0.4) was longer than that of rocuronium (1.3 +/- 0.3). This did not yield a statistical difference in intubating conditions between the two groups. Interval 25-75% T1 recovery and time to 0.8 TOF recovery were prolonged following rocuronium (11.9 +/- 3.9, 52.6 +/- 15.5 respectively) compared to mivacurium (6.7 +/- 2.3, 39.2 +/- 8.1 respectively). More patients, 22/30, required mivacurium maintenance doses compared to 14/30 patients in the rocuronium group. Arterial blood pressure declined and 13/30 patients manifested erythema following mivacurium administration. The acquisition costs of rocuronium (6.93 Euro/patient) were 23% lower compared to mivacurium (8.96 Euro/patient). CONCLUSION: Equi-lasting doses of rocuronium resulted in favourable intubating conditions more rapidly, improved hemodynamic stability, required less frequent administration of maintenance doses and were not associated with erythema, compared to mivacurium.     

Early and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children.

We investigated the influence of the timing of neostigmine administration on recovery from rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade. Eighty adults and 80 children were randomized to receive 0.45 mg/kg rocuronium or 0.075 mg/kg vecuronium during propofol/fentanyl/N2O anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored by train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and adductor pollicis electromyography. Further randomization was made to control (no neostigmine) or reversal with 0.07 mg/kg neostigmine/0.01 mg/kg glycopyrrolate given 5 min after relaxant, or first twitch (T1) recovery of 1%, 10%, or 25%. Another eight adults and eight children received 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine. At each age, spontaneous recovery of T1 and TOF was similar after rocuronium and vecuronium administration but was more rapid in children (P < 0.05). Spontaneous recovery to TOF0.7 after rocuronium and vecuronium administration in adults was 45.7 +/- 11.5 min and 52.5 +/- 15.6 min; in children, it was 28.8 +/- 7.8 min and 34.6 +/- 9.0 min. Neostigmine accelerated recovery in all reversal groups (P < 0.05) by approximately 40%, but the times from relaxant administration to TOF0.7 were similar and independent of the timing of neostigmine administration. Recovery to T1 90% after succinylcholine was similar in adults (9.4 +/- 5.0 min) and children (8.4 +/- 1.1 min) and was shorter than recovery to TOF0.7 in any reversal group after rocuronium or vecuronium administration. Recovery from rocuronium and vecuronium blockade after neostigmine administration was more rapid in children than in adults. Return of neuromuscular function after reversal was not influenced by the timing of neostigmine administration. These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Implications: These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Although spontaneous and neostigmine-assisted recovery is more rapid in children than in adults, in neither is return of function as rapid as after succinylcholine administration.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Pharmacodynamic interactions between cisatracurium and rocuronium

The onset and duration of maintenance doses of neuromuscular blocking drugs may be influenced by the original neuromuscular blocking drug used. We assessed the effect of the interaction between steroidal and benzo-isoquinolinium compounds on the clinical duration of maintenance doses of cisatracurium. Sixty adult patients undergoing anesthesia with isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen were randomized to receive the following: Group I = rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg followed by cisatracurium 0.03 mg/kg when the first twitch in the train-of-four (TOF) recovered to 25%, Group II = cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg followed by cisatracurium 0.03 mg/kg, and Group III = rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg followed by rocuronium 0.15 mg/kg. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using acceleromyography (TOF-Guard, Boxtel, The Netherlands). The clinical duration (mean +/- SD) of the first 2 maintenance doses was 41 +/- 10, 31 +/- 7++, and 25 +/- 8++ min, and 39 +/- 11, 30 +/- 6+, 29 +/- 9* min in Groups I-III, respectively (*P < 0.05, +P < 0.01, ++P < 0.001; Group I versus II and III). Thus, the clinical duration of the first two maintenance doses of cisatracurium was prolonged when administered after rocuronium. IMPLICATIONS: We assessed the clinical effect of administering cisatracurium after an intubating dose of rocuronium in 60 patients undergoing isoflurane/nitrous oxide and oxygen anesthesia. The clinical duration of the first two maintenance doses of cisatracurium administered after rocuronium was significantly prolonged. This supports the contention that combinations of structurally dissimilar neuromuscular blocking drugs result in a synergistic effect.     

性别因素对七氟醚增强顺阿曲库铵或罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响

目的 探讨性别因素对七氟醚增强顺阿曲库铵或罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响.方法 择期全麻手术患者240例,年龄20～60岁,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,BMI 20～30 kg/m2,随机分为2组(n=120):顺阿曲库铵组和罗库溴铵组,各组按性别和麻醉药再分4个亚组(n=30):女性异丙酚组、男性异丙酚组、女性七氟醚组和男性七氟醚组.各异丙酚组靶控输注异丙酚,血浆靶浓度2～6 μg/ml,各七氟醚组吸入七氟醚,于靶控输注或待呼气末七氟醚浓度稳定于1.71%5 min后,静脉注射顺阿曲库铵0.15 mg/kg或罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg.记录肌松起效时间、肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR25%恢复时间.结果 与异丙酚麻醉比较,女性患者七氟醚麻醉时,罗库溴铵TOFR 25%恢复时间延长,顺阿曲库铵肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间延长,男性患者七氟醚麻醉时,罗库溴铵起效时间缩短,肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间延长,顺阿曲库铵肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间延长(P＜0.05或0.01);七氟醚麻醉时与男性患者比较,女性患者罗库溴铵T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间缩短,顺阿曲库铵起效时间缩短(P＜0.05或0.01).结论 七氟醚对罗库溴铵肌松的增强作用存在性别差异,男性强于女性;对顺阿曲库铵肌松的增强作用无明显性别差异.     

Antagonism of rapacuronium using edrophonium or neostigmine: pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

We have studied the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of rapacuronium (Org 9487) in 70 healthy patients. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored using TOF stimulation of the ulnar nerve and mechanomyography of the adductor pollicis muscle. Half of the patients were given a single dose of rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg-1 and the remainder rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg-1 with three incremental doses of 0.5 mg kg-1, each given when T1/T0 had recovered to 25%. In all patients, neuromuscular block was antagonized using neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1 or edrophonium 1.0 mg kg-1 (allocated randomly), 2 min after the final dose of rapacuronium. All patients developed complete block after rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg-1. Mean onset time was 66 (SD 24) s. In patients who received an antagonist 2 min after the first dose of rapacuronium, time to recovery of T1/T0 to 25% was similar after neostigmine (9.8 (3.8) min) and edrophonium (10.3 (4.3) min): in patients who received incremental doses of rapacuronium, spontaneous recovery of T1/T0 to 25% after the first dose was 18.9 (4.7) min. In those who received an antagonist 2 min after the first dose of rapacuronium, times to recovery of T4/T1 to 0.7 were also similar after neostigmine (23.7 (7.7) min) and edrophonium (29.1 (10.7) min). After three incremental doses of rapacuronium, there was a longer time to recovery of T1/T0 = 25% after neostigmine compared with edrophonium (5.1 (1.0) vs 3.3 (1.3) min; P < 0.05) but more rapid recovery to T1/T0 = 75% (10.1 (2.9) vs 16.8 (10.1) min; P < 0.05) and T4/T1 = 0.7 (19.8 (6.3) vs 35.1 (10.4) min; P < 0.05). A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model was justified. Typical values for clearance and initial volume of distribution (V1) were 4.4 ml kg-1 min-1 and 94.8 ml kg-1, respectively. In females, clearance was decreased by 38.5% compared with males and V1 was decreased by 25% in patients aged more than 65 yr.      

Tactile evaluation of train-of-four count as an indicator of reliability of antagonism of vecuronium- or atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Recent evidence suggests that edrophonium is not the agent of choice to reverse profound neuromuscular blockade but remains an efficacious drug when the level of neuromuscular blockade to be antagonized is modest. We studied 90 healthy adults in an attempt to address the questions: 1) How much variability in such neuromuscular parameters as single twitch height and the train-of-four (TOF) fade ratio (T4/T1) exist when the TOF count first returns to four palpable responses? 2) Is edrophonium a reliable antagonist at this measured point of recovery? 3) What is the optimal dose of edrophonium needed to produce prompt (less than 10 min) and satisfactory (T4/T1 greater than 0.7) reversal when the fourth response of the thumb to indirect TOF stimulation just becomes palpable? Patients were given a bolus atracurium or vecuronium (n = 45 in each group) followed by an iv infusion sufficient to maintain single twitch as measured by electromyography at 10-15% of control values. At the end of surgery, the infusion was terminated and spontaneous recovery was allowed to begin. Once the tactile TOF count was four, edrophonium 0.3, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/kg was administered. At a count-of-four the first twitch averaged 37% of control (+/- 8.5% standard deviation; pooled data from all groups) and the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.14 +/- 0.049. After atracurium neuromuscular blockade, edrophonium 0.3 mg/kg produced adequate antagonism in 10 min. At this time the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.79 +/- 0.07 and the lowest observed value was 0.67. Increasing the edrophonium dose to 0.75 mg/kg accelerated recovery by 4-5 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Residual Block after Mivacurium with or without Edrophonium Reversal in Adults and Children

Background: The rapid recovery from mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block has encouraged omission of its reversal. The purpose of this study was to determine, in children and in adults, whether failure to reverse mivacurium neuromuscular block was associated with residual neuromuscular block on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit.

Methods: In 50 children, aged 2-12 yr, and 50 adults, aged 20-60 yr, anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and fentanyl, and neuromuscular block was achieved by an infusion of mivacurium, to maintain one or two visible responses to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve. At the end of surgery, mivacurium infusion was stopped, and 10 min later, reversal was attempted with saline or 0.5 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 edrophonium by random allocation. On arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, a blinded observer assessed patients clinically and by stimulation of the ulnar nerve with a Datex electromyogram in the uncalibrated TOF mode.

Results: Children arrived in the postanesthesia care unit 8.2 +/-3.4 min after reversal of neuromuscular block and showed no sign of weakness, either clinically or by TOF stimulation. Although TOF ratio was greater in children who had received edrophonium (1.00 +/-0.05 vs. 0.93+/-0.01, P < 0.01), TOF was > 0.7 in all children. Adults arrived in the postanesthesia care unit 12.9+/- 5.3 min after reversal of neuromuscular block (P < 0.01 vs. children). Six in the saline group demonstrated weakness (two required immediate reversal of neuromuscular block, and TOF was < 0.7 in four others), compared with TOF < 0.7 in only one of the edrophonium group (P < 0.05).     

Neuromuscular effects of rapacuronium in pediatric patients during nitrous oxide-halothane anesthesia: comparison with mivacurium

PURPOSE: To describe neuromuscular effects of rapacuronium in pediatric patients during N2O-halothane anesthesia and compare them with mivacurium in children. METHODS: 103 pediatric patients, seven days -12 yr, received rapacuronium or mivacurium during N2O-halothane anesthesia. Onset and recovery of block were measured using EMG (Datex). Block was compared between groups based on drug treatment and age. Children < two years received 1 or 2 mg x kg(-1) rapacuronium: 2-12 yr received either 2 mg x kg(-1) or 3 mg x kg(-1) rapacuronium, or 0.2 mg x kg(-1) mivacurium. RESULTS: There were no differences in onset (1.7+/-1.8 min) or maximum block (T1 2.4+/-8%) among neonates, infants, and toddlers after either dose of rapacuronium. There was no difference between 1 and 2 mg x kg(-1) of rapacuronium block at 60 sec. Train-of-four ratio (T4/T1) >0.7 occurred later after 2 mg x kg(-1) than 1 mg x kg(-1) in these patients (P<0.05). There was no difference in T25 among neonates, infants and toddlers for 1 mg x kg(-1) or 2 mg x kg(-1) doses. Rapacuronium, 3 mg x kg(-1), produced maximum block 1.5 min earlier than did mivacurium, 0.2 mg x kg(-1) (P<0.001). There was no difference in block at 60 sec, maximum block or time to maximum block between 2 and 3 mg x kg(-1) rapacuronium for children > two years of age. Maximum block occurred 1.0+/-0.5 min after 2 or 3 mg x kg(-1) when T1 was 0.2+/-1.1% of baseline. T25 and T4/T1 >0.7 occurred 10 to 11 min later after this dose of rapacuronium than after mivacurium. CONCLUSION: Rapacuronium produces block earlier than mivacurium. Recovery from rapacuronium block is dose related and slower than that following mivacurium during halothane anesthesia.     

A comparison of edrophonium and neostigmine for the antagonism of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block

Edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, or neostigmine, 0.05 mg/kg, was administered to groups of 20 patients each, for antagonism of atracurium-induced block at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular block (TOF ratio of 0.7) was achieved in all patients given neostigmine but only in 13 of the 20 given edrophonium. The onset of action of edrophonium (23 sec) was significantly more rapid than that of neostigmine (40 sec), as was the time taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 in those in whom adequate antagonism was achieved (68 sec for edrophonium and 246 sec for neostigmine). Five of the seven patients in the edrophonium group who failed to be reversed adequately had shown three or fewer twitches to a TOF stimulation. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, particularly if all four responses to a TOF stimulation are not elicited prior to antagonism of the block.     

Effective Reversal of Moderate Rocuronium- or Vecuronium-induced Neuromuscular Block with Sugammadex, a Selective Relaxant Binding Agent

Background: Sugammadex rapidly reverses rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. This study explored the dose-response relation of sugammadex given as a reversal agent at reappearance of the second muscle twitch after rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced block. A secondary objective was to investigate the safety of single doses of sugammadex.

Methods: In this two-center, phase II, dose-finding study, 80 patients (age >= 18 yr, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, surgery >= 60 min requiring muscle relaxation for intubation) were randomly assigned to receive rocuronium (0.60 mg/kg) or vecuronium (0.10 mg/kg). Sugammadex or placebo was administered at reappearance of the second muscle twitch. The primary efficacy endpoint was time from starting sugammadex administration until recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9.

Results: Compared with placebo, sugammadex produced dose-dependent decreases in mean time to recovery for all train-of-four ratios in the rocuronium and vecuronium groups. The mean time for recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 in the rocuronium group was 31.8 min after placebo compared with 3.7 and 1.1 min after 0.5 and 4.0 mg/kg sugammadex, respectively. The mean time for recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 in the vecuronium group was 48.8 min after placebo, compared with 2.5 and 1.4 min after 1.0 and 8.0 mg/kg sugammadex, respectively. Sugammadex was well tolerated.     

Train-of-four ratio recovery often precedes twitch recovery when neuromuscular block is reversed by sugammadex

Background: Sugammadex reverses rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block (NMB). In all published studies investigating sugammadex, the primary outcome parameter was a train‐of‐four (TOF) ratio of 0.9. The recovery time of T1 was not described. This retrospective investigation describes the recovery of T1 vs. TOF ratio after the reversal of NMB with sugammadex. Methods: Two studies were analyzed. In study A, a phase II dose‐finding study, ASA I–II patients received an intravenous (IV) dose of rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg, followed by an IV dose of sugammadex (2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0 or 16.0 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9% saline) after 5 min. In study B, a phase III trial comparing patients with renal failure and healthy controls, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was used to induce NMB; sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg was administered at reappearance of T2. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed by acceleromyography and TOF nerve stimulation. The primary efficacy variable was time from the administration of sugammadex to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9. Retrospectively, the time to recovery of T1 to 90% was calculated. Results: After the reversal of rocuronium‐induced NMB with an optimal dose of sugammadex [16 mg/kg (A) or 2 mg/kg (B)], the TOF ratio recovered to 0.9 significantly faster than T1 recovered to 90%. Clinical signs of residual paralysis were not observed. Conclusion: After the reversal of NMB by sugammadex, full recovery of the TOF ratio is possible when T1 is still depressed. The TOF ratio as the only measurement for the adequate reversal of NMB by sugammadex may not always be reliable. Further investigations for clinical implications are needed.