Daptomycin-reversible rifampicin resistance in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

OBJECTIVES: In a previous study, we observed marked synergy between daptomycin and rifampicin against 73% of rifampicin-resistant, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE), with approximately 100-fold reductions in rifampicin MICs observed at one-eighth to one-fourth daptomycin MIC. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the synergy between daptomycin and rifampicin could be explained by enhanced entry of rifampicin into the cell or was related to amino acid substitutions in the rifampicin-binding site in the beta subunit (rpo beta) of the RNA polymerase. METHODS: We developed a bioassay for rifampicin to measure cell-bound rifampicin levels as well as metabolic inactivation of rifampicin. In addition, we sequenced the rifampicin-binding site in the rpo beta of VRE strains with and without synergy between daptomycin and rifampicin. RESULTS: Cell-bound rifampicin levels were the same in rifampicin-susceptible VRE as in rifampicin-resistant VRE showing daptomycin synergy and were not affected by the presence of daptomycin. In contrast, rifampicin-resistant VRE without daptomycin synergy had undetectable cell-bound rifampicin. Sequencing the rpo beta rifampicin-binding site revealed that the synergistic strains had the same sequence as rifampicin-susceptible wild-type E. faecium. The daptomycin synergy-resistant strains all had mutations in known rifampicin-binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin is able to reverse rifampicin resistance in some strains of VRE, but the mechanism could not be explained by an effect of daptomycin on entry of rifampicin into or transport out of the cell, by inactivation of rifampicin or by mutation involving the rifampicin-binding site.     

VanD-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium 10/96A

VanD type Enterococcus faecium 10/96A is constitutively resistant to vancomycin and to low levels of teicoplanin by nearly exclusive synthesis of peptidoglycan precursors terminating in D-alanyl-D-lactate (L. M. Dalla Costa, P. E. Reynolds, H. A. Souza, D. C. Souza, M. F. Palepou, and N. Woodford, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3444-3446, 2000). A G(184)S mutation adjacent to the serine involved in the binding of D-Ala1 in the D-alanine:D-alanine ligase (Ddl) led to production of an impaired Ddl and accounts for the lack of D-alanyl-D-alanine-containing peptidoglycan precursors. The sequence of the vanD gene cluster revealed eight open reading frames. The organization of this operon, assigned to a chromosomal location, was similar to those in other VanD type strains. The distal part encoded the VanH(D) dehydrogenase, the VanD ligase, and the VanX(D) dipeptidase, which were homologous to the corresponding proteins in VanD-type strains. Upstream from the structural genes for these proteins was the vanY(D) gene; a frameshift mutation in this gene resulted in premature termination of the encoded protein and accounted for the lack of penicillin-susceptible D,D-carboxypeptidase activity. Analysis of the translated sequence downstream from the stop codon, but in a different reading frame because of the frameshift mutation, indicated homology with penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) with a high degree of identity with VanY(D) from VanD-type strains. The 5' end of the gene cluster contained the vanR(D)-vanS(D) genes for a putative two-component regulatory system. Insertion of ISEfa4 in the vanS(D) gene led to constitutive expression of vancomycin resistance. This new insertion belonged to the IS605 family and was composed of two open reading frames encoding putative transposases of two unrelated insertion sequence elements, IS200 and IS1341.     

Varying linezolid susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates during therapy: a case report

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic used in the treatment of infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Resistance to linezolid has been associated with a G2576U mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA. Patient and methods: We present clinical details and susceptibility data from multiple Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from a liver transplant patient over 13 months. MICs of linezolid, vancomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin were determined using Etest. Molecular typing was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Domain V of the 23S rRNA gene in the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was amplified. Linezolid concentrations were analysed by HPLC. RESULTS: We report the emergence of resistance to linezolid in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium during linezolid treatment. After discontinuation of the linezolid therapy, the isolate reverted to susceptibility. However, after re-administration of linezolid the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium became resistant to linezolid again. The isolates that were resistant to linezolid had a G2576T mutation in their 23S rDNA. CONCLUSION: We describe a clinical case that shows the shift of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from linezolid resistance to susceptibility and then back to resistance again related to linezolid therapy.     

Antibiotic treatment of experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin- and ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

We compared ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and gentamicin treatments, alone and in combination, for 5 days in the therapy of experimental aortic valve endocarditis in rats caused by a clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. The MICs and MBCs of vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and gentamicin were 250 and > 1,000, 3.1 and 6.3, 0.098 and 1.6, and 12.5 and > 50 micrograms/ml, respectively. Infected rats were sacrificed after completing 5 days of therapy. Additional rats within each treatment group were followed for 5 days beyond the last dose of antibiotic therapy. Although survivals in the different groups were not significantly different after 5 days of therapy, survival was significantly better 5 days beyond the last dose of antibiotic therapy in rats treated with rifampin-containing regimens. The combination of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin was bactericidal in vitro and in vegetations from rats with enterococcal endocarditis. Rifampin alone was similarly bactericidal in vivo, but it was not significantly better than rifampin in combination with other antibiotics. Subpopulations resistant to rifampin, but not ciprofloxacin, were detected in the inoculum and in most vegetations during therapy. However, the combination of ciprofloxacin plus both gentamicin and rifampin reduced both the rifampin-susceptible and -resistant population in vegetations of 9 of 10 animals below the level of detection after 5 days of therapy. Nevertheless, a residual enterococcal population apparently remained in numbers of < 2 log10 CFU/g after 5 days of therapy, which resulted in relapse. Perhaps a longer course of therapy would have eliminated this residual population and improved efficacy.     

Activities of the oxazolidinones linezolid and eperezolid in experimental intra-abdominal abscess due to Enterococcus faecalis or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

The in vivo effectiveness of oxazolidinones eperezolid (U-100592) and linezolid (U-100766) against one strain each of Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was examined in a rat model of intra-abdominal abscess. MICs of both drugs were 2 microg/ml for each strain. At doses of 25 mg/kg of body weight twice daily intravenously or orally, linezolid produced small but statistically significant reductions in abscess bacterial density for E. faecalis. The reduction in viable cells observed would not likely be clinically relevant. Eperezolid was ineffective at this dose. At a dosage of 100 mg/kg/day, linezolid treatment led to an approximately 100-fold reduction in viable cells per gram of abscess. Against E. faecium infections, intravenous eperezolid and oral linezolid were effective, reducing densities approximately 2 log(10) CFU/g. Both oxazolidinones demonstrated activity against enterococci in this model. However, results were modest with the dosing regimens employed.     

Short course of linezolid treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis

Enterococci might be one of the meningitis pathogens, but meningitis is rarely caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. In this report, we present a 69-year-old man who had the underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with long-term steroid treatment suffered from a meningitis episode after hospitalisation for the urinary tract infection. The cerebrospinal fluid culture of the patient grew Enterococcus faecium which was resistant to vancomycin. A vancomycin-resistant E. faecium was also isolated from the rectal swab of the patient. These two E. faecium isolates were found to harbour the vanA gene and to be identical by pulsed field gel electrophoresis typing. The patient was treated successfully with intravenous linezolid, 600 mg every 12 h for 2 weeks. This was the first case of meningitis caused by vancomycin-resistant E. faecium in Taiwan.     

Constitutively vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium resistant to synergistic beta-lactam combinations.

Vancomycin resistance among enterococci has recently been recognized. Synergy between vancomycin and penicillin has been shown in vitro for isolates of Enterococcus faecium resistant to both of these antibiotics. We describe three isolates of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium which demonstrate unique phenotypic characteristics. The isolates exhibited high-level resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin, consistent with the VanA phenotype. However, resistance in these isolates could not be induced or cured, and mating experiments failed to detect a transfer of resistance. The combination of vancomycin and penicillin did not significantly change the MIC of penicillin for any of the three isolates. Immunoblotting with polyclonal anti-VanB antibody showed no reaction with the cellular proteins of these strains. Probing with a vanA oligonucleotide revealed hybridization with chromosomal but not plasmid DNA. The mechanism of constitutive resistance of those strains remains unclear. A second mutational change, perhaps involving PBP 5, may explain the presence of resistance to synergistic combination penicillin-vancomycin therapy. In vitro evaluation of penicillin-vancomycin should be carried out in all clinical cases where this therapeutic regimen is being considered.     

Linezolid in prophylaxis against experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis

There are no experimental studies regarding the prophylactic efficacy of linezolid against infective endocarditis. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis of the aortic valve was induced in rabbits by the insertion of a polyethylene catheter. Twenty-four hours later, animals were randomly assigned to a control group, and groups receiving either ampicillin (two doses of 40 mg/kg of body weight each, given intravenously, 2 h apart) or linezolid (a single per os dose of 75 mg/kg). The first dose of ampicillin and the single dose of linezolid were administered 0.5 and 1 h, respectively, prior to the intravenous inoculation of approximately 10(7) CFU of Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis. Linezolid peak levels in rabbit serum were similar to the peak serum levels in humans following a 600-mg oral dose of linezolid. Linezolid prevented endocarditis in 87% of S. oralis-challenged rabbits (P < 0.001 versus controls; P = 0.026 versus ampicillin). In rabbits challenged with E. faecalis, linezolid prevented endocarditis in 73% (P = 0.003 versus controls; P = 0.049 versus ampicillin). Ampicillin prevented endocarditis due to S. oralis or due to E. faecalis in 47% (P = 0.005 versus controls) and in 30% (P = not significant versus controls) of the challenged animals, respectively. In conclusion, linezolid was effective as prophylaxis against endocarditis caused by a strain of S. oralis and to a lesser degree against that caused by a strain of E. faecalis. Its prophylactic efficacy was superior to that of ampicillin.     

Virulence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium According to Linezolid Resistance and Clinical Outbreak Status

Assessing clinical virulence differences between vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) strains resistant to linezolid (LRVRE) and linezolid-susceptible VRE (LSVRE) strains is difficult due to confounding patient variables. Galleria mellonella is a validated host interaction model allowing straightforward organism virulence assessment. The objective of this study was to assess the virulence of VREF in G. mellonella according to linezolid resistance and clinical outbreak status. A genetically related pair of VREF strains with and without genotypically confirmed linezolid resistance was selected for analysis. Additionally, six strains of LSVRE and two strains of LRVRE were selected according to epidemiologic outbreak status. Mortality of G. mellonella was assessed daily over a 5-day period and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log rank tests. Linezolid resistance did not have a significant effect on G. mellonella mortality in the genetically related pair (P = 0.93). There was no significant difference in mortality over time between strains (non-outbreak [i.e., no patient transmissions were recorded] [n = 2] versus outbreak [i.e., transmission occurred between 3 or more patients in a period of 30 days] [n = 6], P = 0.84; extensive transmission [i.e., the isolate was transmitted between at least 80 patients] [n = 2] versus limited transmission [i.e., the isolate was transmitted between fewer than 10 patients] [n = 4], P = 0.78). These results suggest that patients infected with LRVRE or outbreak strains of VREF are at no greater risk of poor outcomes mediated by organism virulence than those infected with LSVRE or non-outbreak strains.     

Gastrointestinal tract colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an animal model.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci have become important nosocomial pathogens in many institutions. The gastrointestinal tract of susceptible hosts serves as the likely reservoir from which the organism is disseminated. To study factors promoting colonization and the efficacy of decontamination therapy with antimicrobial agents, a model of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was developed in CF1 mice. At baseline, all animals were colonized with non-vancomycin-resistant enterococci (5.0 log10 CFU/g), but vancomycin-resistant organisms were not detectable. Following gastric inoculation with 5 x 10(8) CFU of a clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, the strain transiently colonized the gastrointestinal tract of 100% of mice but was undetectable by Day 14 (< or = 2.7 log10 mean CFU/g). In animals who received 5 mg of streptomycin per ml or 250 micrograms of vancomycin per ml in drinking water, colonization with the organism occurred at significantly higher bacterial counts than in controls at 7 days following inoculation (9.4 for vancomycin, 9.2 for streptomycin, and 5.1 log10 mean CFU/g for controls; P < 0.05). Fecal concentrations of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium persisted at high counts through Day 22 in mice receiving these antibiotics, but low counts were also still detected in 3 of 10 control animals. In mice with previously established vancomycin-resistant E. faecium colonization, oral administration of ramoplanin, a lipoglycodepsipeptide to which the strain was susceptible, suppressed growth of all enterococci in feces, including the vancomycin-resistant strain after 7 days of therapy (< or = 3.1 and < or = 3.3 log10 mean CFU/g for vancomycin and streptomycin groups, respectively). All mice had a recurrence of colonization with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium after the ramoplanin was discontinued. In summary, this animal model demonstrates the importance of antibiotics in predisposing to gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. Although treatment with ramoplanin temporarily suppressed the organism, recurrence of colonization due to relapse or reinfection occurred.     

Characterization of vanY, a DD-carboxypeptidase from vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium BM4147.

VanY is a protein with a molecular mass of 34.8 kDa encoded by vanY, a member of the high-level vancomycin resistance gene cluster found on plasmid pIP816 in Enterococcus faecium BM4147. Extracts from Escherichia coli JM83 bearing plasmid pAT383, which contains the vanY gene, were examined for enzymatic hydrolysis of peptidoglycan precursors. VanY was associated with the cell membranes and cleaved the C-terminal D-alanine residue of UDP-muramyl-pentapeptide but did not display transpeptidase or beta-lactamase activities. The DD-carboxypeptidase activity was not inhibited by beta-lactam antibiotics. VanY released the C-terminal D-hydroxy acid from depsipeptides produced by the vancomycin resistance protein VanA. These results demonstrate that VanY should contribute in vivo to the hydrolysis of both the D-alanyl-D-alanine- and the depsipeptide-containing peptidoglycan precursors.     

Single-dose oral amoxicillin or linezolid for prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis

Endocarditis prophylaxis following genitourinary or gastrointestinal procedures targets Enterococcus faecalis. Prophylaxis recommendations advocate oral amoxicillin (2 g in the United States and 3 g in the United Kingdom) in moderate-risk patients and intravenous amoxicillin (2 g) or vancomycin (1 g) plus gentamicin in high-risk patients. While ampicillin-resistant (or amoxicillin-resistant) E. faecalis is still rare, there is a concern that these regimens might fail against vancomycin-resistant and/or aminoglycoside-resistant isolates. The present study tested oral linezolid as an alternative. Rats with catheter-induced aortic vegetations were given prophylaxis simulating human pharmacokinetics of oral amoxicillin (2- to 3-g single dose), oral linezolid (600 mg, single or multiple oral doses every 12 h), or intravenous vancomycin (1-g single dose). Rats were then inoculated with the minimum inoculum infecting 90% of the animals (90% infective dose [ID(90)]) or with 10 times the ID(90) of the vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis strain JH2-2 or the vancomycin-resistant (VanA phenotype) E. faecalis strain UCN41. Amoxicillin was also tested with two additional vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis strains, 309 and 1209. Animals were sacrificed 3 days later. All the tested bacteria were susceptible to amoxicillin and gentamicin. Single-dose amoxicillin provided 100% protection against all four isolates at both the ID(90) and 10 times the ID(90). In contrast, linezolid required up to four consecutive doses to provide full protection against the vancomycin-resistant isolate. Vancomycin protected only against the vancomycin-susceptible strain. The high efficacy of single-dose oral amoxicillin suggests that this regimen could be used for prophylaxis in both moderate-risk and high-risk patients without additional aminoglycosides. Linezolid appears to be less reliable, at least against the vancomycin-resistant strain.     

First characterization of Tn1546-like structures of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium Thai isolates

IntroductionVancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) carrying vanA was first isolated from patient at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand in 2004. Since then, VREfm isolates have been detected increasingly in this 2500-bed university hospital. To understand the epidemiology of vanA VREfm in this setting, the isolates collected during 2004–2013 were characterized.MethodsA total of 49 vanA VREfm isolates previously confirmed by multiplex PCR were characterized by determining resistance phenotypes to vancomycin, teicoplanin, ampicillin and ciprofloxacin by broth microdilution method. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and virulence genes of those isolates were investigated. The Tn1546 structure diversity was studied by long-range overlapping PCR and primer walking sequencing.ResultsOf all isolates studied, 9 sequence types (ST17, ST80, ST78, ST730, ST203, ST18, ST280, ST64, ST323) in clonal complex 17 and a novel ST1051 were revealed. The esp-positive isolates were 73.5%. Of all vanA operons characterized, at least 9 types of Tn1546-like structures were detected. All of vanA determinants contained 5′-end different from the Tn1546 prototype. Approximately 47% of them also carried the insertion sequence IS1251 at the intergenic region between vanS and vanH. Interestingly, another IS (ISEfa4) was found to be inside the sequence of IS1251 in ST17 isolate.ConclusionHeterogeneity of vanA VREfm was observed. Nearly all of isolates studied belonged to CC17. One novel ST1051 strain was detected. Isolates in the initial period carried vanA operon similar to the prototype. The diversity of vanA determinants has been increased in the recent isolates. A novel vanA operon structure was detected.     

Comparison of the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia

In published studies, cohorts of patients with bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) have predominantly been infected with Enterococcus faecium. Little is known about the epidemiology and outcomes associated with bacteremia due to VR Enterococcus faecalis. A retrospective study of isolates obtained from January 2008 to October 2010 was conducted at Detroit Medical Center (DMC). Unique patients with blood cultures positive for VRE were reviewed. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. During the study period, 105 cases of bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis and 197 cases of bacteremia due to VR E. faecium were identified. The mean age in the study cohort was 61.5 ± 15 years; 162 subjects (53.6%) were male. After controlling for a propensity score, bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with >2-fold-lower in-hospital mortality than bacteremia due to VR E. faecium. Interestingly, bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with longer hospital stay after VRE isolation, although total length of stay was similar for groups with VR E. faecalis and VR E. faecium. Bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with a >2-fold-lower risk for mortality than bacteremia due to VR E. faecium, possibly due to the availability of β-lactam therapeutics for treatment of VR E. faecalis.