Omalizumab rapidly decreases nasal allergic response and FcepsilonRI on basophils

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody that is effective for the treatment of allergic respiratory disorders; however, its onset of action is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the onset of action of omalizumab through the use of a challenge model to determine time-dependent inhibition of ragweed-induced changes in nasal volume as well as correlate the kinetics of omalizumab-induced decreases in serum free IgE and FcepsilonRI receptors on basophils. METHODS: We conducted a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 24 rhinitic patients with ragweed allergy. After PD(30) ragweed nasal allergen challenge, patients received either omalizumab, approximately 0.016 mg/kg per IgE (IU/mL), or placebo at days 0 and 28 and were rechallenged with ragweed PD(30) dose biweekly. FcepsilonRI expression on blood basophils was determined by flow cytometry at baseline and 7, 14, 28, and 42 days after treatment. IgE levels were measured at baseline and on days 3, 28, and 42. RESULTS: Mean IgE levels decreased by 96% (P <.001) from baseline within 3 days in the omalizumab group. Baseline 30% ragweed-induced nasal volume response was decreased to 20.4% at 7 to 14 days (P <.001) and 12.2% at 35 to 42 days (P <.001) for the omalizumab group. There was a median decrease in basophil FcepsilonRI expression of 73% (P <.001) in the omalizumab group, with maximum inhibition occurring within 14 days of treatment. No significant changes in IgE levels, nasal allergen challenge responses, or basophil FcepsilonRI expression were observed throughout the study in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the onset of action by omalizumab in blunting ragweed-induced nasal responses is within 2 weeks, and this response was associated with 2 putative mechanisms of action: decreased serum free IgE and decreased FcepsilonRI receptor expression on immune effector cells.     

Omalizumab,a recombinant humanized anti-IgE antibody,reduces asthma-related emergency room visits and hospitalizations in patients with allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: Prevention of serious asthma exacerbations is an important therapeutic goal in patients with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of omalizumab (Xolair), a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, on the rate of serious exacerbations during long-term therapy. METHODS: A pooled analysis was completed of 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studies with omalizumab in adults/adolescents aged > or =12 years (n = 1071) and in children aged 6 to 12 years (n = 334) who required treatment with inhaled corticosteroids for allergic asthma. Rates of serious asthma exacerbations were computed and compared between omalizumab- and placebo-treated patients. Serious exacerbations were those leading to unscheduled outpatient visits, emergency room treatment, or hospitalization during 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: In all, 767 patients were treated with omalizumab (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL], administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks). Another 638 patients were treated with placebo. The rate of unscheduled, asthma-related outpatient visits was lower for the omalizumab-treated patients than for the placebo-treated patients (rate ratio [95% CI], 0.60 [0.44, 0.81]; P <.01), as were asthma-related emergency room visits (rate ratio [95% CI], 0.47 [0.24, 1.01]; P =.05). Importantly, hospitalizations for asthma were markedly reduced in patients receiving omalizumab (rate ratio [95% CI], 0.08 [0.00, 0.25]; P <.01). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab reduces the rate of serious asthma exacerbations and the need for unscheduled outpatient visits, emergency room treatment, and hospitalization in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.     

Anti-IgE: lessons learned from effects on airway inflammation and asthma exacerbation

Omalizumab is an mAb that binds free IgE and ultimately reduces the density of IgE-loaded receptors on IgE effector cells. Because IgE effector cells, such as mast cells and basophils, are a source of proinflammatory chemokines, cytokines, and proteases, it is not surprising that omalizumab has anti-inflammatory effects, most notably large effects in reducing airway eosinophilia. What has been surprising is the nature of the clinical effects of omalizumab. Rates of exacerbation in omalizumab-treated patients are approximately half those in placebo-treated patients. This important clinical effect has occurred despite the fact that omalizumab does not improve nonspecific bronchial hyperesponsiveness and does not have large effects on airflow. The unsuspected dissociations among asthma outcomes uncovered during clinical trials of omalizumab remind us that mysteries remain for how inflammation, remodeling, and airway function are linked in asthma.     

Grass pollen immunotherapy: symptomatic improvement correlates with reductions in eosinophils and IL-5 mRNA expression in the nasal mucosa during the pollen season

BACKGROUND: Tissue eosinophilia and infiltration by T(H)2-type T cells are characteristic features of allergic rhinitis both after allergen challenge and during natural allergen exposure. Specific immunotherapy inhibits allergen-induced nasal eosinophilia. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess, in the context of a randomized trial, the relationships between symptomatic improvement after immunotherapy and eosinophil numbers and IL-5 expression in the nasal mucosa during the pollen season. METHODS: Nasal biopsy specimens were taken from 37 adults with severe summer hay fever at baseline (out of season) and at peak season after 2 years of treatment with a depot grass pollen extract or placebo. Biopsy specimens were processed for immunohistochemistry by using mAbs against eosinophils (EG2), T cells (CD3), and IL-2 receptor-positive cells (CD25), as well as for in situ hybridization by using a sulfur 35-labeled antisense riboprobe directed against IL-5. RESULTS: Immunotherapy significantly reduced symptoms (49%, P =.01) and medication requirements (80%, P =.007) compared with placebo. There was a 400% increase (P =.004) in eosinophils during the pollen season in placebo-treated patients, which was inhibited in the immunotherapy group (20% increase, P =.04 between groups). Seasonal increases were also observed for CD25(+) cells (P =.002), CD3(+) cells (P =.02), and IL-5 mRNA-expressing cells (P =.03) in the placebo group but not in the immunotherapy group. A significant correlation was observed between eosinophils and IL-5 expression (r = 0.5, P <.05). Both eosinophils (r = 0.6, P <.02) and IL-5 (r = 0.6, P <.02) correlated with symptoms after immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Improvement in symptoms after grass pollen immunotherapy may result, at least in part, from inhibition of IL-5-dependent tissue eosinophilia during the pollen season.     

Efficacy and tolerability of anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab in patients with concomitant allergic asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis: SOLAR

BACKGROUND: Anti-IgE therapy could be particularly beneficial for patients with concomitant disease as it targets a common factor in both diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with concomitant moderate-to-severe asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab. A total of 405 patients (12-74 years) with a stable treatment (>/= 400 microg budesonide Turbuhaler) and >/= 2 unscheduled medical visits for asthma during the past year or >/= 3 during the past 2 years were enrolled. Patients received omalizumab (>/= 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/ml] per 4 weeks) or placebo for 28 weeks. RESULTS: Fewer patients treated with omalizumab experienced asthma exacerbations (20.6%) than placebo-treated patients (30.1%), P = 0.02. A clinically significant (>/= 1.0 point) improvement in both Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire occurred in 57.7% of omalizumab patients compared with 40.6% of placebo patients (P < 0.001). Omalizumab reduced Wasserfallen symptom scores for asthma (P = 0.023), rhinitis (P < 0.001) and the composite asthma/rhinitis scores (P < 0.001) compared with placebo. Serious adverse events were observed in 1.4% of omalizumab-treated patients and 1.5% of placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab is well tolerated and effective in preventing asthma exacerbations and improving quality of life in patients with concomitant asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis.     

Anti-IgE (omalizumab) inhibits late-phase reactions and inflammatory cells after repeat skin allergen challenge

BACKGROUND: Anti-IgE (omalizumab) inhibited early and late asthmatic reactions and infiltration of inflammatory cells in asthmatic bronchial biopsies at baseline. The effect of chronic allergen exposure on these outcomes is unknown. Repeat allergen challenge in human skin represents a suitable model to address this question. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of anti-IgE (omalizumab) on early-phase (EPR) and late-phase (LPR) skin reactions and cellular infiltration by using a repeat skin allergen challenge designed to imitate chronic allergen exposure. METHODS: Twenty-four atopic allergic volunteers received omalizumab or placebo for 12 weeks. Paired intradermal challenges of allergen (30 biological units) and diluent control were administered on 9 occasions at 2-week intervals. Early-phase and late-phase skin reactions and cellular infiltration in skin biopsies (using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization) were measured at intervals. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, omalizumab-treated patients had a progressive reduction in the LPR that was significantly greater than its effect on the EPR (median, --63% vs--24% respectively; P=.009). In addition, significant reduction of the LPR was reached within 2 weeks of commencing treatment, compared with 8 weeks for the EPR. There was a priming effect of repeated allergen challenge on infiltration of eosinophil, neutrophil, T(H)2 (CD3(+)/IL-4(+)), and total FcepsilonRI(+) cells in patients on placebo that was abrogated in those receiving omalizumab. CONCLUSION: The more marked effect of omalizumab on the LPR and prevention of the repeat-dose priming effect on several inflammatory cell types support a role for anti-IgE treatment in conditions associated with chronic allergic inflammation.     

Omalizumab, anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of severe allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: A recombinant humanized anti-IgE mAb, omalizumab, forms complexes with free IgE, blocking its interaction with mast cells and basophils; as a consequence, it might be effective in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of inhaled corticosteroid-dependent asthma. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 525 subjects with severe allergic asthma requiring daily inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to receive placebo or omalizumab subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on baseline IgE level and body weight. Inhaled corticosteroid doses were kept stable over the initial 16 weeks of treatment and tapered during a further 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Omalizumab treatment resulted in significantly fewer asthma exacerbations per subject and in lower percentages of subjects experiencing an exacerbation than placebo treatment during the stable steroid phase (0.28 vs 0.54 [P =.006] and 14.6% vs 23.3% [P =.009], respectively) and during the steroid reduction phase (0.39 vs 0.66 [P =.003] and 21.3% vs 32.3% [P =.004], respectively). Beclomethasone dipropionate reduction was significantly greater with omalizumab treatment than with placebo (median 75% vs 50% [P <.001]), and beclomethasone dipropionate discontinuation was more likely with omalizumab (39.6% vs 19.1% [P <.001]). Improvements in asthma symptoms and pulmonary function occurred along with a reduction in rescue beta-agonist use. Omalizumab was well tolerated, with an adverse-events profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: The addition of omalizumab to standard asthma therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and decreases inhaled corticosteroid and rescue medication use.     

Omalizumab in allergic diseases, a recent review

Omalizumab is a biological engineered molecule, targeting the Cepsilon3 domain of the IgE molecule. It binds with free IgE and prevents free IgE from attaching to high-affinity IgE receptor (FcepsilonRI) on effector cells such as mast cells, basophils and also on dendritic cells. The result is a blocking of mediator release from these cells and the inhibition of antigen presentation by dendritic cells. In addition, omalizumab downregulates FcepsilonRI expression on these effector cells. Omalizumab prevents early and late phase allergic reactions of skin and lungs. Omalizumab has been investigated extensively in moderate-to-severe asthma in adults and children. It effectively reduces rates of asthma exacerbation, emergency visits for asthma and hospital admissions among these patients. Currently, omalizumab is primarily indicated for patients, age 6 years and over, with moderate to severe asthma (GINA step 4). Omalizumab was investigated in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (to ragweed, birch and grass pollens) and has been found to improve rhinitis symptoms and to reduce medication use among these patients. Administered together with allergen immunotherapy, omalizumab reduced incidence of side effects and rates of anaphylaxis from allergen immunotherapy. Omalizumab has been investigated in the treatment of food allergy, atopic dermatitis and urticaria. Despite benefits observed from these initial trials, it further deserves investigations to clarify optimal conditions for use in these conditions. Side effects from omalizumab were few, however, it requires careful considerations in administration of this agent. An observational period (up to 2 hours after the first three doses) and the availability of auto-injectable epinephrine are recommended. Pharmacoeconomics of omalizumab is briefly reviewed. Omalizumab represents a major breakthrough of translational medicine in allergy.     

Effects of omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, on nasal reactivity to allergen and local IgE synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with omalizumab has been shown to reduce serum free IgE concentrations and to have beneficial effects on allergic airway disease. However, its effect on IgE synthesis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether omalizumab therapy affects nasal reactivity to allergen and local IgE production. METHODS: Nineteen patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were treated with intravenous omalizumab every 2 weeks for 26 weeks in an open-label study. Serum free and total IgE concentrations were measured at baseline and every 2 weeks throughout the study. Nasal challenge to dust mite allergen was performed at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Nasal lavage fluid obtained before and after each nasal challenge was evaluated for mite-specific antibodies, plaque-forming cells, and productive epsilon messenger RNA (mRNA). RESULTS: During treatment, serum free IgE concentrations were decreased by 97% to 99%, and the nasal response to allergen challenge was significantly reduced on days 80 and 164. The postchallenge increase in nasal lavage mite specific IgE was significantly reduced by treatment with omalizumab on day 168. IgE plaque-forming cells and productive epsilon mRNA were not significantly affected by omalizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab treatment markedly reduced serum free IgE and the clinical response to nasal allergen challenge. However, the absence of an effect on IgE-secreting B cells and epsilon mRNA in nasal lavage fluid suggests that omalizumab treatment for 6 months does not significantly modulate synthesis of nasal IgE.     

Omalizumab-induced reductions in mast cell Fce psilon RI expression and function

BACKGROUND: By design, omalizumab binds free IgE in the circulation and prevents its attachment to the surface of mast cells and basophils, thereby preventing them from responding to allergens. Previously, omalizumab rapidly reduced free IgE levels, as well as basophil high-affinity IgE receptors, leading to significant reductions in basophil mediator response to allergen. It is assumed that tissue mast cells are similarly altered in their Fc epsilon RI density and function. OBJECTIVE: We examined the phenotypic shift of skin mast cells in parallel to that of blood basophils in 3 subjects infused with omalizumab. METHODS: Three subjects with allergic rhinitis underwent intradermal skin test titration with house dust mite antigen at days 0, 7, 70, and 196 of omalizumab treatment. As control subjects, 5 untreated subjects with allergic rhinitis were evaluated at similar time points. All subjects underwent skin biopsy 18 to 24 hours later at the site of allergen injection. Biopsy specimens were characterized by means of immunohistochemisty for tryptase and Fc epsilon RI alpha immunoreactivity, as well other markers (CD3, CD45RO, CD68, cutaneous lymphocyte antigen, and major basic protein). RESULTS: Omalizumab recipients, but not control subjects, demonstrated reductions in Fc epsilon RI alpha immunoreactivity at days 70 and 196 in parallel with reductions in the acute wheal response to allergen. However, no reductions in tryptase-positive cells were noted at these time points. CONCLUSION: Reductions in free IgE levels by omalizumab leads to a rapid reduction in basophil Fc epsilon RI receptor expression. In contrast, the time course for the decrease of Fc epsilon RI expression in skin mast cells is slower and associated with decreased acute allergen wheal size.     

Effect of topical corticosteroids on seasonal increases in epithelial eosinophils and mast cells in allergic rhinitis: a comparison of nasal brush and biopsy methods

BACKGROUND: Nasal brushing and nasal biopsy are well-tolerated sampling techniques. Seasonal grass pollen-induced rhinitis is characterized by epithelial mast cell infiltration and seasonal increases in both epithelial and sub-mucosal eosinophils. OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of the nasal brush and nasal biopsy techniques to detect natural seasonal increases in eosinophils and mast cells, and to assess the influence of topical corticosteroid. METHODS: Nasal brush samples and nasal biopsies were collected from 46 grass pollen-sensitive seasonal rhinitis patients before the grass pollen season and at the peak of the pollen season following 6 weeks' treatment with either fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (200 microg, twice daily) or placebo nasal spray. RESULTS: Placebo patients showed seasonal increases in epithelial eosinophils both with nasal brushing (P < 0.0001) and biopsy (P < 0.001). Epithelial mast cell numbers also increased during the pollen season as detectable by brushing (P < 0.0001) and biopsy (P < 0.03). Changes in cell numbers measured by nasal brushing correlated with those observed with nasal biopsy, both for eosinophils and mast cells (P < 0.05). Sub-mucosal eosinophils but not mast cells also increased during the pollen season (P < 0.002). Nasal brushing and biopsy revealed that fluticasone treatment inhibited seasonal increases in epithelial eosinophils (P < 0.00001) and epithelial infiltration by mast cells (nasal brushing P < 0.00001 and nasal biopsy P < 0.01). Fluticasone also inhibited seasonal increases in sub-mucosal eosinophils (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced nasal symptoms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nasal brushing harvests sufficient inflammatory cells from the surface of the nasal mucosa to be used in lieu of nasal biopsies in observation of the effect of drugs on the nasal epithelium.     

Anti-IgE for the treatment of allergic rhinitis--and eventually nasal polyps?

In allergic rhinitis, cross-linking of IgE molecules upon allergen contact induces degranulation of mast cells and basophils within the mucosal tissue and results in the release of typical mediators, which consecutively induce the well-known symptoms. Omalizumab counteracts these interactions by reducing serum levels of free IgE. Therapy targeted at IgE also interferes with its binding to the low-affinity receptors inhibiting the amplification of the Th(2)-type response. Treatment of allergic rhinitis with anti-IgE has been shown to be safe and to reduce specific symptoms. Furthermore, the combination of omalizumab with specific immunotherapy may not only increase efficacy but also safety in selected patients. Therefore, we reviewed previously published studies on omalizumab therapy in allergic rhinitis, either as monotherapy or in combination with immunotherapy. In patients with nasal polyps, a local multiclonal IgE response has recently been described, initiated by Staphylococcus aureus-derived enterotoxins, which at least modifies the inflammatory reaction within the tissue. Evidence accumulates that these enterotoxins act as superantigens resulting in a multiclonal T- and B-cell activation with massive IgE formation within the airways. Because of the multiclonality, a range of allergens could possibly maintain a constant degranulation of mast cells present in the polyp tissue, which may contribute to disease severity. We here discuss a proof-of-concept treatment trial with omalizumab in nasal polyposis, which--in case of a positive therapeutic response--would also pave the way for anti-IgE treatment approaches for severe non-atopic lower airway disease.     

Upregulation of nasal mucosal eotaxin in patients with allergic rhinitis during grass pollen season: effect of a local glucocorticoid

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a common disease characterized by infiltration of eosinophils into the nasal mucosa during the periods of symptoms. Among chemokines, which attract cells to the site of inflammation, eotaxin is relatively specific for eosinophils. OBJECTIVE: We examined the influence of grass pollen season on nasal eotaxin expression in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, as well as the effect of a nasal glucocorticoid on this eotaxin expression. METHODS: Nineteen patients with allergic rhinitis received treatment with either nasal beclomethasone (400 microgram/day) or placebo over a grass pollen season. In these patients, nasal biopsies were taken prior to and during the peak of the pollen season and stained immunohistochemically for eotaxin and EG2 + eosinophils. Five healthy subjects served as controls and gave nasal biopsies once prior to the pollen season. RESULTS: Prior to pollen season, there was no significant difference in nasal eotaxin expression between patients with allergic rhinitis and healthy subjects. Grass pollen season induced significant increase in eotaxin expression in placebo-treated (P = 0.04; n = 9) but not in beclomethasone-treated rhinitis patients (P = 0.8; n = 10). During peak grass pollen season, the eotaxin expression in placebo-treated patients was significantly higher compared with healthy subjects outside season (P = 0.03). There was no significant correlation between the expression of eotaxin and the number of EG2 + eosinophils in nasal mucosa. The serum levels of eotaxin in rhinitis patients remained stable over the pollen season. CONCLUSION: Expression of eotaxin in nasal mucosa of grass-pollen allergic rhinitis patients is upregulated during pollen season and treatment with a nasal glucocorticoid protects against this upregulation.     

Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment with omalizumab in allergic diseases: an update on anti-inflammatory activity and clinical efficacy

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody developed for the treatment of allergic disease, with established efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma and in patients with intermittent (seasonal) and persistent (perennial) allergic rhinitis (AR). Omalizumab is known to result in a marked reduction in serum levels of free IgE and down-regulation of IgE receptors on circulating basophils. Recent work has shed further light on its mechanism of action, showing significant and profound reductions in tissue (nasal and bronchial) eosinophils and in bronchial IgE+ cells (mast cells), as well as T cells and B cells. Omalizumab treatment was also shown to be associated with down-regulation of IgE receptors on circulating (precursor) dendritic cells, suggesting that blocking IgE may inhibit more chronic aspects of allergic inflammation involving T cell activation. Further work with omalizumab demonstrated it to have important benefits in patients with poorly controlled asthma despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy, and analysis of clinical data suggests that the patients who are the best 'responders' to anti-IgE treatment are those with asthma at the more severe end of the spectrum. Notably, systemic anti-IgE therapy with omalizumab has been shown to improve symptoms, quality of life and disease control (asthma exacerbations) in patients with concomitant asthma and persistent AR. These impressive clinical data and the studies elucidating the anti-inflammatory profile of omalizumab also serve to emphasize the fundamental importance of IgE in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases.     

Omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports show that addition of omalizumab to standard therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and simultaneously decreases use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and rescue medication in patients with allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of omalizumab on long-term disease control in patients with severe allergic asthma. METHODS: The present study concerns the 24-week, double-blind extension phase to a previous 28-week core study in which patients received subcutaneous omalizumab or matching placebo (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL] every 4 weeks) for 16 weeks in addition to their existing ICS therapy (beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]; steroid-stable phase), followed by a 12-week phase in which controlled attempts were made to gradually reduce ICS therapy (steroid-reduction phase). During the extension phase patients were maintained on randomized treatment (omalizumab or placebo) and the lowest sustainable dose of BDP. The use of other asthma medications was permitted during the extension phase. Investigators were also allowed to switch patients from BDP to other ICS medications if considered necessary. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (omalizumab, n = 245; placebo, n = 215) entered the extension phase. Overall, omalizumab-treated patients experienced significantly fewer exacerbations vs placebo during the extension phase (0.60 and 0.83 exacerbations per patient, respectively; P = 0.023), despite a sustained significant reduction in their use of ICS (mean BDP equivalent dose: omalizumab, 227 microg/d; placebo, 335 microg/d; P < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab was well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.     

Omalizumab treatment downregulates dendritic cell FcepsilonRI expression

BACKGROUND: Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent antigen-presenting cells that express FcepsilonRI, the high-affinity IgE receptor. Although the downregulation of basophil FcepsilonRI during anti-IgE therapy with omalizumab is well documented, its effect on FcepsilonRI expression by DCs has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that IgE regulates surface FcepsilonRI expression by DCs in vivo and that, consequently, anti-IgE therapy decreases FcepsilonRI expression by DCs. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 24 subjects (16 receiving omalizumab and 8 receiving placebo) with seasonal allergic rhinitis received the study drug on days 0 and 28. Serial blood samples drawn on days 0, 7, 14, 28, and 42 were analyzed for precursor DC1 (pDC1) and pDC2 surface expression of FcepsilonRIalpha by using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Omalizumab caused a significant decrease in surface FcepsilonRI expression at all time points examined in both the pDC1 and pDC2 subsets. No significant change was seen with placebo. The maximum decrease in FcepsilonRI expression in the omalizumab group was 52% and 83%, respectively, for the pDC1 and pDC2 subsets. The decrease in FcepsilonRI expression by both pDC subsets correlated with the decrease in serum-free IgE and was of a similar magnitude to that found in basophils. A 10-fold decrease in IgE corresponded to a 42% and 54% decrease in surface FcepsilonRI expression by the pDC1 and pDC2 subsets, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that anti-IgE therapy causes a rapid decrease in DC surface FcepsilonRI expression and establish that IgE is an important regulator of FcepsilonRI expression by DCs.     

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray reduces inflammatory cells in unchallenged allergic nasal mucosa: effects of single allergen challenge

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroid therapy reduces symptoms and nasal mucosal inflammatory cells in patients with allergic rhinitis. Usually patients are advised to start their medication (1 week) before the beginning of the pollen season. The effect of pretreatment with a topical corticosteroid on unchallenged nasal mucosa is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the effect of 6 weeks' pretreatment with 200 microg twice daily fluticasone propionate on nasal symptoms and inflammatory cell numbers after nasal allergen provocation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Nineteen patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were treated for a 6-week period out of the grass pollen season. After completing the treatment period, patients were challenged with grass pollen. Nasal mucosal biopsy specimens were taken 5 times in every patient. In nasal mucosa changes in numbers of T cells, B cells, mast cells, eosinophils, macrophages, and Langerhans' cells were investigated. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment but before allergen provocation, significantly fewer epithelial Langerhans' cells, macrophages, mast cells, T cells, and eosinophils were found in the fluticasone propionate group compared with those found in the placebo group. In the lamina propria significantly fewer Langerhans' cells and eosinophils were found in the fluticasone propionate group. Cell influx in nasal mucosa after allergen provocation was significantly inhibited in the fluticasone propionate group compared with that in the placebo group for epithelial Langerhans' cells, mast cells, macrophages, and T cells and for lamina propria eosinophils, mast cells, Langerhans' cells, macrophages, and T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone propionate is effective in reducing early- and late-phase nasal symptoms. Topical corticosteroid treatment reduces inflammatory cells in unchallenged nasal mucosa.     

Mast cell regulation of epithelial TSLP expression plays an important role in the development of allergic rhinitis

Epithelial cell-derived thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a master switch for asthma or atopic dermatitis by inducing a dendritic cell-mediated Th2-type allergic inflammation. Allergic rhinitis is also pathologically characterized by Th2-type allergic inflammation. This study demonstrates that mast cells regulate the epithelial TSLP expression in allergic rhinitis. TSLP expression was found to be up-regulated predominantly in the nasal epithelium in the ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized and -nasally challenged mouse model of allergic rhinitis, which was abolished in mast cell-deficient WBB6F1-W/W(v) in comparison with control WBB6F1-+/+ mice. Similarly, the epithelial TSLP expression was reduced in Fc receptor gamma chain (FcgammaR)-deficient mice, where the high-affinity IgE receptor (FcepsilonRI) is not expressed on mast cells, in comparison with control C57BL/6 mice. Furthermore, the administration of neutralizing TSLP antibody during the challenge phase of OVA inhibited the development of allergic rhinitis. These results suggest that the direct stimulation of epithelial cells by antigens alone may not be sufficient to induce TSLP expression in the nasal epithelium, and that mast cell regulation of epithelial TSLP expression, possibly via FcepsilonRI, plays an important role in the development of allergic rhinitis.     

The anti-inflammatory effects of omalizumab confirm the central role of IgE in allergic inflammation

Anti-IgE therapy with omalizumab reduces serum levels of free IgE and downregulates expression of IgE receptors (Fc epsilonRI) on mast cells and basophils. In the airways of patients with mild allergic asthma, omalizumab reduces Fc epsilonRI+ and IgE+ cells and causes a profound reduction in tissue eosinophilia, together with reductions in submucosal T-cell and B-cell numbers. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, omalizumab inhibits the allergen-induced seasonal increases in circulating and tissue eosinophils. Omalizumab decreases Fc epsilonRI expression on circulating dendritic cells, which might lead to a reduction in allergen presentation, T(H)2 cell activation, and proliferation. As a systemic anti-IgE agent, omalizumab has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with moderate and severe allergic asthma and in those with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, as well as in patients with concomitant allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis. The anti-inflammatory effects of omalizumab at different sites of allergic inflammation and the clinical benefits of anti-IgE therapy in patients with allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis emphasize the fundamental importance of IgE in allergic inflammation.     

Omalizumab improves asthma-related quality of life in patients with severe allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, reduces asthma exacerbations and decreases inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) requirement in patients with severe allergic asthma who were symptomatic despite moderate-to-high doses of ICSs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of omalizumab on asthma-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: These analyses were part of a multicenter, 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous omalizumab (> or =0.016 mg/kg of IgE [in international unit per milliliter] per 4 weeks) in 525 adults with severe allergic asthma. A 16-week steroid-stable phase was followed by a 12-week steroid-reduction phase and a 24-week double-blind extension phase. The effect of treatment on asthma-related QOL was evaluated by using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) administered at baseline and at weeks 16, 28, and 52. RESULTS: The 2 treatment groups were comparable in terms of baseline AQLQ scores. At weeks 16, 28, and 52, omalizumab-treated patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all AQLQ domains, as well as in overall score. Moreover, a greater proportion of patients receiving omalizumab achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in asthma-related QOL during each phase of the study. Greater than 50% of both patients and investigators rated treatment similarly with omalizumab as excellent or good compared with less than 40% of placebo recipients. CONCLUSION: In patients requiring moderate-to-high doses of ICSs for severe allergic asthma, the measurably improved disease control afforded by add-on omalizumab therapy is paralleled by clinically meaningful improvements in asthma-related QOL.