Dosing regimen effects of modafinil for improving daytime wakefulness in patients with narcolepsy

In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study the authors compared the efficacy of modafinil 400 mg once daily, 400 mg given in a split dose, or 200 mg once daily for maintaining wakefulness throughout the day in patients (N = 32) with narcolepsy reporting a positive daytime response to modafinil but late-afternoon/evening sleepiness. Efficacy evaluations included an extended Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (9:00 am to 9:00 pm), the Clinical Global Impression of Change scale, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Modafinil demonstrated significant improvement in wakefulness as assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale compared with placebo at baseline (all P < 0.001). Modafinil significantly improved patients' ability to sustain wakefulness, as demonstrated by mean sleep latency at week 3 compared with placebo at baseline (all P < 0.001). The 400-mg split-dose regimen improved wakefulness significantly in the evening compared with the 200-mg and 400-mg once-daily regimen (both P < 0.05). The percentage of patients rated as "much improved" or "very much improved" with respect to evening sleepiness was 27%, 82%, and 80% in the 200-mg, 400-mg once-daily, and 400-mg split-dose groups, respectively. Adverse events were mild to moderate in nature and included headache, nausea, nervousness, dyspepsia, pain, and vomiting (all 6%). Some patients may benefit from 400-mg doses of modafinil taken once daily compared with 200-mg doses. A split-dose 400-mg regimen may be superior to once-daily dosing for sustaining wakefulness throughout the entire waking day.     

A comparison of once-daily and divided doses of modafinil in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of several modafinil dosing regimens in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to determine whether modafinil can be given once daily in pediatric ADHD. METHOD: Children and adolescents (age range, 6-13 years) (N = 248) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD were enrolled in a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted February-May 2002. The group was assigned to receive oral (100-mg tablets) modafinil 300 mg once daily (300 mg in the morning followed by placebo at midday), modafinil 300 mg as a divided dose (100/200 mg or 200/100 mg), or matching placebo. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, a higher dose of 400 mg (200/200 mg) was evaluated. Efficacy measures included the teacher-rated School Version and clinician-rated Home Version of the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and the parent-completed Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scales. RESULTS: 223 children completed the study. Those who received modafinil 300 mg once daily showed a significantly greater improvement (change from baseline) than those who received placebo in symptoms of ADHD across all rating scales and subscales (all p < .05). Divided 300-mg doses of modafinil provided some significant but inconsistent improvements in ADHD symptoms. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, modafinil 400 mg (200/200 mg) was significantly superior to placebo on clinician- and parent-completed scales (all p < .05). Insomnia was the only adverse event to occur with significantly greater frequency in a modafinil group (200/100) than in the placebo group (14% vs. 2%) (p = .03). CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improved ADHD symptoms in children. Once-daily dosing (300 mg) provided the most consistent improvement in symptoms. All dosing regimens of modafinil were well tolerated.     

Gabapentin (Neurontin) as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Partial Seizures: A Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

Summary: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin, GBP) as add-on therapy in 272 patients with refractory partial seizures who were receiving one to two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Efficacy assessments compared the frequency of partial seizures during the 12-week treatment phase (T) and the 12-week baseline period (B). The primary analysis compared data for patients receiving GBP 900 mg/day with placebo; the GBP 1,200-mglday group provided doseresponse data. Efficacy criteria were percentage of change in seizure frequency (PCH), responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), and response ratio, where RRatio = (T B)/(T + B). Median PCH was–21.8% in the 900-mg/day group and ?17.8% in the 1,200-mg/day group as compared with ?0.3% in the placebo group. Responder rate was 22.9% in the 900-mg/day group and 10.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.020, Fisher's exact test). Adjusted mean Rratio was-0.136 in the 900-mg/day group and ?0.025 in the placebo group (p = 0.0046, analysis of variance ANOVA). Results showed slightly greater improvement for the 1,20-mg/day than for the 900-mg/day group (RRatio =?0.157, responder rate 28.0%). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 69% of patients in the 900-mg/day group and in 64% in the 1,200-mg/day group as compared with 52% in patients receiving placebo as add-on therapy. The most frequent AE among patients treated with GBP were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Clinical laboratory evaluations showed no clinically important trends and no evidence of hepatic or hematopoietic effects. GBP is safe and effective in treating some patients with refractory partial seizures.     

Pregabalin for treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a 4-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pregabalin and alprazolam

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin inhibits release of excess excitatory neurotransmitters, presumably by binding to the alpha2-delta subunit protein of widely distributed voltage-dependent calcium channels in the brain and spinal cord. OBJECTIVE: To assess the anxiolytic efficacy of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator trial. Patients were randomized to 4 weeks of treatment with pregabalin, 300 mg/d (n = 91), 450 mg/d (n = 90), or 600 mg/d (n = 89); alprazolam, 1.5 mg/d (n = 93); or placebo (n = 91). SETTING: Psychiatry research and clinic settings. PATIENTS: Outpatients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for generalized anxiety disorder, with a baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score of 20 or greater. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from baseline to end point in total HAM-A score in the pregabalin and alprazolam groups compared with the placebo group. The end point response criterion was 50% or greater reduction in the HAM-A total score. RESULTS: Pregabalin and alprazolam produced a significantly greater reduction in mean +/- SE HAM-A total score at last-observation-carried-forward end point compared with placebo (-8.4 +/- 0.8): pregabalin, 300 mg (-12.2 +/- 0.8, P<.001), 450 mg (-11.0 +/- 0.8, P = .02), and 600 mg (-11.8 +/- 0.8, P = .002), and alprazolam (-10.9 +/- 0.8, P = .02). By week 1 and at last-observation-carried-forward end point, the 3 pregabalin groups and the alprazolam group had significantly (P<.01) improved HAM-A psychic anxiety symptoms compared with the placebo group. Compared with the placebo group, HAM-A somatic anxiety symptoms were also significantly (P<.02) improved by the 300- and 600-mg pregabalin groups, but not by the 450-mg pregabalin (week 1, P = .06; week 4, P = .32) and the alprazolam groups (week 1, P = .21; week 4, P = .15). Of the 5 treatment groups, the 300-mg pregabalin group was the only medication group that differed statistically in global improvement at treatment end point not only from the placebo group but also from the alprazolam group. CONCLUSION: Pregabalin was significantly more efficacious than placebo for the treatment of psychic and somatic symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and was well tolerated by most study patients.     

Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, LEV (500 or 1,000 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo as add-on therapy in 324 patients with uncontrolled simple or complex partial seizures, or both, with or without secondary generalization. After enrollment, three parallel groups were assessed during a baseline period of 8 or 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week titration interval and a 12-week evaluation period. RESULTS: LEV significantly decreased partial seizure frequency compared with placebo. A reduction in seizure frequency of > or =50% occurred in 22.8% of patients in the 1,000-mg group and 31.6% of patients in the 2,000-mg group, compared with 10.4% of patients in the placebo group. Administration of LEV did not affect plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs or alter vital signs or laboratory parameters. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between treatment groups (70.8% for the 1,000-mg group and 75.5% for the 2,000-mg group), or between the LEV and placebo groups (73.2% for placebo group). The most commonly reported adverse effects in the LEV group were asthenia, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of LEV (1,000 mg/d and 2,000 mg/d, administered in two divided doses) as add-on therapy was established in patients with refractory partial seizures in this clinical study.     

Effects of modafinil on wakefulness and executive function in patients with narcolepsy experiencing late-day sleepiness

OBJECTIVES: A modafinil daily dosing strategy promotes wakefulness in narcolepsy patients experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness; however, some patients may continue to experience late-day sleepiness. Excessive sleepiness in narcolepsy is associated with cognitive impairment. Modafinil has improved executive function in other models of excessive sleepiness. This study evaluated the effects of once-daily vs. split doses of modafinil on wakefulness and of combined doses on executive function in narcolepsy patients experiencing late-day sleepiness despite satisfactory modafinil treatment earlier in the day. METHODS: After a 2-week washout, 24 patients received 3 weeks of double-blind treatment with modafinil 400-mg once daily (7 AM) plus placebo (noon) or modafinil 600-mg split dose (400 mg, 7 AM; 200 mg, noon). Assessments included a Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) for individual regimens and the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) for treatments combined. RESULTS: Modafinil 600-mg split dose was significantly more effective than modafinil 400-mg once daily in improving late-day MWT scores (5 PM-7 PM; P < 0.05). Significant mean (+/- SEM) reductions from baseline of 8.2 +/- 2.7 in the total number of errors and 5.9 +/- 1.9 in total percent of errors (P < 0.05, both) were demonstrated for modafinil on the WCST. Modafinil was well tolerated; adverse events included headache (n = 1), emotional lability (n = 1), bronchitis (n = 1), and accidental injury (n = 2), with no reports of insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with residual late-day sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, an additional 200-mg dose of modafinil taken at midday was effective in sustaining wakefulness throughout the entire waking day. Treatment with modafinil also significantly improved executive function.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose tolerability and safety study of remacemide as adjuvant therapy in Parkinson's disease with response fluctuations

The objective of this study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of the low affinity non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist remacemide in patients who have Parkinson's disease with response fluctuations or dyskinesias, or both. A total of 33 patients were randomly assigned in a 3-to-1 ratio to receive remacemide or placebo. Remacemide was administered orally at 150 mg twice daily, increasing incrementally by 100 mg (50 mg twice daily) at 2-week intervals to a final daily regimen of 400 mg twice daily or until a maximum tolerated dose was identified. The maximum total treatment period was 12 weeks. Of the 23 patients randomly selected to receive remacemide, four completed the study at the maximum permitted dose, compared with four of the 10 patients given placebo. The median maximum tolerated dose of remacemide was 450 mg/d. There was no clinically relevant change in percentage of "on" time between baseline and maximum tolerated dose in either group. At the maximum tolerated dose of remacemide for each patient, the mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination score (part III) decreased from 33 (SD = 18) to 26 (SD = 13) compared with a decrease from 28 (SD = 12) to 27 (SD = 8) in the placebo group. There was a decrease in the mean UPDRS "complications of therapy" score (part IV) in the remacemide group from 8 (SD = 4) to 6 (SD = 4), and the placebo group remained unchanged at 6 (SD = 4). The most common adverse events associated with remacemide were nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, abnormal vision, and hypokinesia. Remacemide was well tolerated at a dose level of 400 mg/d. There was a trend suggesting that remacemide was effective in improving symptoms at patients' individual maximum tolerated doses. These improvements occurred without exacerbating levodopa-induced dyskinesias.     

Randomized trial of the triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor NS 2330 (tesofensine) in early Parkinson's disease.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three daily dosages of the triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor NS 2330 (tesofensine) compared to placebo as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease (PD). In MPTP (1-methyl 4-phenyl-tetrahydropyridine 1,2,3,6)-lesioned marmosets, dopamine reuptake inhibitors have been demonstrated to reverse parkinsonian signs without evoking established dyskinesia. NS 2330 inhibits reuptake of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. We performed a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind trial of NS 2330. Two hundred sixty-one subjects with PD < 5 years and not receiving dopaminergic treatment were randomly assigned to daily treatment with NS 2330 at 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, or placebo. Adjusted mean difference in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores from baseline to week 14 was -0.7 (P = 0.64) in the 0.25-mg group, -1.3 (P = 0.41) in the 0.5-mg group, and -1.7 (P = 0.27) in the 1.0-mg group. The adjusted mean difference in total UPDRS score for the highest dose group (1.0 mg/day) was superior to placebo at week 6 (-3.1; P = 0.02), but this effect was not sustained. NS 2330 was generally well tolerated and the most commonly reported adverse events were constipation, insomnia, and dry mouth. Decreased body weight and elevated heart rate were common in the 1.0-mg dosage group. At the dosages tested, NS 2330 did not provide significantly greater benefit than placebo. It is possible that inhibition of dopamine reuptake alone does not provide clinical benefit in early PD, adequate inhibition of dopamine reuptake was not achieved in this study, or countervailing physiologic mechanisms offset the potential benefit.     

A pooled analysis of adjunctive topiramate in refractory partial epilepsy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of different dosages of topiramate (TPM) add-on to stable antiepileptic therapy for refractory partial epilepsy in adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pooled intention-to-treat analysis of six similarly designed double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, including 481 patients treated with doses of TPM 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg/day, and 265 patients receiving placebo. RESULTS: Seizures were reduced by >/=50% from baseline in 41% of TPM-treated patients and 15% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001); 5 and 0.8%, respectively, were seizure-free (P < 0.003). TPM was significantly better than placebo regardless of gender, age, baseline seizure rate as well as number and type of concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Efficacy was statistically significant in favour of TPM at all dose levels: at least 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 40% of patients with 200 mg, 41% with 400 mg, 44% with 600 mg and 41% with 800 mg TPM when compared with 15% with placebo (P 相似文献   

Oxcarbazepine in painful diabetic neuropathy: results of a dose-ranging study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine in patients with diabetic neuropathy in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging 16-week study. METHODS: A total of 347 patients were randomized to oxcarbazepine 600 mg/day (n = 83), 1,200 mg/day (n = 87), 1,800 mg/day (n = 88), or placebo (n = 89). The primary efficacy variable was change in mean visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline to the last week of the study. RESULTS: No difference between any oxcarbazepine group and the placebo group was noted for the primary efficacy variable. Both the 1,200- and 1,800-mg/day groups showed a trend toward statistical significance (P = 0.101, P = 0.096, respectively). Statistically significant differences were found between the oxcarbazepine 1,200-mg/day (P = 0.038) and 1,800-mg/day (P = 0.005) groups and placebo in the overall mean weekly VAS scores for the entire double-blind treatment phase. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary efficacy variable did not reach statistical significance, patients taking oxcarbazepine 1,200 and 1,800 mg/day showed improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo. Oxcarbazepine may provide clinically meaningful pain relief in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.     

A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of two oral doses of levetiracetam, 2000 mg daily and 4000 mg daily, without titration in patients with refractory epilepsy.

The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and efficacy of two oral regimens of levetiracetam, 1000 mg and 2000 mg twice daily, as add-on treatment without titration in patients with refractory epilepsy. After a 1- to 4-week baseline, 119 patients were randomized to receive levetiracetam 2000 mg daily, 4000 mg daily, or placebo for a 24-week double-blind period, then levetiracetam 4000 mg daily in a 24-week open-label phase. Somnolence was the most common reason for discontinuation, and along with asthenia, occurred more frequently with levetiracetam than placebo. Responder rates were higher with levetiracetam 2000 mg and 4000 mg daily (48.1% [P < 0.05] and 28.6% [NS], respectively) than placebo (16.1%). In the open-label phase, the overall responder rate was 43.0%. Switching from placebo to levetiracetam increased the overall responder rate from 16.7% to 44.0%. No such increase was observed with patients initiated on levetiracetam 2000 mg daily. Levetiracetam initiated at doses of 2000 mg or 4000 mg daily without titration is well-tolerated and effective as add-on therapy in patients with partial and/or generalized seizures. The higher dose may be related to an increased incidence of somnolence and is not necessarily more effective than the lower dose.     

Effectiveness of low doses of paroxetine controlled release in the treatment of major depressive disorder

CONTEXT: Paroxetine controlled release (CR) is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in the dosage range of 25 to 62.5 mg daily. However, lower daily doses (12.5 mg and 25 mg) of this formulation have not been investigated in the treatment of MDD. If the 12.5-mg and 25-mg doses are found to be efficacious, these lower doses may well convey a superior tolerability profile for paroxetine CR in the treatment of MDD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability profile of daily doses of paroxetine CR 12.5 mg and 25 mg versus placebo in the treatment of MDD. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in 40 clinical investigation centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 447 adult (> or = 18 years of age) outpatients who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD and with a baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of at least 20 comprised the intent-to-treat study population (mean age = 38.8 years; 58.4% female; 75.6% white). INTERVENTION: Eligible patients completing a 1-week single-blind placebo run-in period were randomly assigned to receive once-a-day study medication (paroxetine CR 12.5 mg [N = 156], paroxetine CR 25 mg [N = 154], or placebo [N = 149]) in an 8-week, double-blind, parallel cell comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to study endpoint (week 8) as measured by the HAM-D. Secondary efficacy measures included change from baseline to study endpoint as assessed by both the depressed mood item on the HAM-D and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S). The proportion of patients considered at study endpoint to be in response (CGI-Improvement score of 1 or 2) or in remission (HAM-D < or = 7) in the 3 treatment groups was also compared. Quality of life was assessed by the change from baseline in total score of the short form of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). Safety observations were made by assessing the proportion of patients who had adverse experiences, including laboratory and electrocardiographic abnormalities, during the treatment period. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis revealed that both the 12.5-mg and the 25-mg paroxetine CR treatment groups were associated with significant therapeutic effects (change in HAM-D score) from baseline to study endpoint (LOCF: p = .038, 95% CI = -3.38 to -0.09 and p = .005, 95% CI = -4.06 to -0.74, respectively). Results from the Wilcoxon rank sum test of the depressed mood item of the HAM-D (p = .011, 95% CI = -0.57 to -0.07) demonstrated significant efficacy in the 25-mg treatment group but not in the 12.5-mg group. However, LOCF analysis of the CGI-S revealed significant therapeutic effects for both the 12.5-mg (p = .018, 95% CI = -0.61 to -0.06) and 25-mg (p < .001, 95% CI = -0.78 to -0.22) treatment groups. Significantly more patients in the 25-mg paroxetine CR-treated group than in the placebo-treated group met criteria for response (CGI-Improvement score of 1 or 2, p = .035, OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.73) as well as for remission (HAM-D score 相似文献   

Fampridine-SR in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of sustained-release 4-aminopyridine in subjects with mutiple sclerosis (MS) and to examine dose-related efficacy up to 40 mg twice daily. METHOD: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study. Following a 4-week baseline peroid, subjects were randomly assigned to receive Fampridine-SR (n=25, doses from 10 to 40 mg twice daily, increasing in 5 mg increments weekly) or placebo (n=11). A battery of assessments was performed weekly, including the MS Functional Composite (MSFC), fatigue questionnaires, and lower extremity manual muscle testing. RESULTS: The most common adverse events were dizziness, insomnia, paresthesia, asthenia, nausea, headache, and tremor. Five subjects were discontinued from Fampridine-SR because of adverse events at doses greater than 25 mg, and these included convulsions in two subjects at doses of 30 and 35 mg twice daily. Improvement were seen in lower extremity muscle strength (prospective analysis) and walking speed (post-hoc analysis) in the Fampridine-SR group compared to placebo (unadjusted p-values of 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). There were no significant differences in other MSFC measure or fatigue scores. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should employ doses up to 20 mg twice daily with lower extremity strength and walking speed as potential outcome measures.     

Efficacy and safety of tarenflurbil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomised phase II trial

BACKGROUND: The amyloid-beta peptide Abeta(42) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to test the effects of tarenflurbil, a selective Abeta(42)-lowering agent (SALA), on cognition and function in patients with mild to moderate AD. METHODS: 210 patients living in the community who had a mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score of 15-26 were randomly assigned to receive tarenflurbil twice per day (400 mg [n=69] or 800 mg [n=70]) or placebo (n=71) for 12 months in a phase II, multicentre, double-blind study. Primary efficacy outcomes were the AD assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living scale (ADCS-ADL), and the clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb). In a 12-month extended treatment phase, patients who had received tarenflurbil continued to receive the same dose, and patients who had received placebo were randomly assigned to tarenflurbil at 800 mg or 400 mg twice per day. Primary efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with Health Canada (084527) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in the UK (20365/0001/A 69316). FINDINGS: A prespecified interaction analysis revealed that patients with mild AD (baseline MMSE 20-26) and moderate AD (baseline MMSE 15-19) responded differently to tarenflurbil in the ADAS-cog and the ADCS-ADL (p>or=0.10); therefore, these groups were analysed separately. Patients with mild AD in the 800 mg tarenflurbil group had lower rates of decline than did those in the placebo group in activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL difference in slope 3.98 [95% CI 0.33 to 7.62] points per year, effect size [reduction from placebo decline rate] 46.4%, Cohen's d 0.45; p=0.033) and global function (CDR-sb difference -0.80 [-1.57 to -0.03] points per year, effect size 35.7%, Cohen's d 0.42; p=0.042); slowing of cognitive decline did not differ significantly (ADAS-cog difference -1.36 [-4.07 to 1.36] points per year, effect size 33.7%, Cohen's d 0.20; p=0.327). In patients with moderate AD, 800 mg tarenflurbil twice per day had no significant effects on ADCS-ADL and ADAS-cog and had a negative effect on CDR-sb (-52%, Cohen's d -1.08; p=0.003). The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (in seven, nine, and five patients in the 800 mg, 400 mg, and placebo groups, respectively), nausea (in seven, seven, and four patients), and dizziness (in five, nine, and four patients). Patients with mild AD who were in the 800 mg tarenflurbil group for 24 months had lower rates of decline for all three primary outcomes than did patients who were in the placebo group for months 0-12 and a tarenflurbil group for months 12-24 (all p<0.001), and had better outcomes than did patients who were in the placebo group for months 0-12 and the 800 mg tarenflurbil group for months 12-24 (all p<0.05). INTERPRETATION: 800 mg tarenflurbil twice per day was well tolerated for up to 24 months of treatment, with evidence of a dose-related effect on measures of daily activities and global function in patients with mild AD. FUNDING: Myriad Pharmaceuticals.     

A randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose comparison of paroxetine and placebo in the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to determine the effectiveness and safety of various daily dosages of paroxetine for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder. METHOD: A 1-week, single-blind, placebo run-in was followed by 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. 384 eligible patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine, 20 (N = 97), 40 (N = 95), or 60 mg (N = 97), or placebo (N = 95) once daily in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Primary efficacy variables included mean change from baseline in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) total score and proportion of patients exhibiting a therapeutic response (defined as a Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement scale [CGI-1] score of 1 or 2). RESULTS: In the last-observation-carried-forward analyses, patients treated with paroxetine, 20 mg/day, had significantly greater improvement on mean LSAS total scores compared with those receiving placebo (p < .001), while the incidence of responders, based on the CGI-I rating, was significantly greater with paroxetine, 40 mg/day, than with placebo (p = .012). Patients treated with paroxetine, 20 and 60 mg, also had significantly better responses on the social item of the Sheehan Disability Scale than did patients treated with placebo (p < .019). The completer analyses showed a significant difference between the placebo group and the 20-mg and 40-mg paroxetine groups on LSAS total score and rate of response (p < or = .006). There were no serious adverse experiences attributed to paroxetine treatment. CONCLUSION: Paroxetine, 20 mg/day, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with generalized social anxiety disorder and significantly improves social anxiety, avoidance of social interactions, social disability, and overall clinical condition. Further data analyses are needed to determine whether more specific guidelines for paroxetine dosage escalation in social anxiety disorder can be drawn.     

Effects of topiramate in patients with cerebellar tremor

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and potential beneficial effect of topiramate (TPM) as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to carbamazepine (CBZ) in patients with cerebellar tremor. METHODS: Nine patients with cerebellar tremor participated a 4-week, open-label, prospective-controlled trial. TPM was given as monotherapy (n=7 cases), or in combination with CBZ (n=2 cases), at dosages ranging from 25 mg twice daily to 100 mg twice daily. The severity of tremor was assessed clinically on a 0-4 scale, by tremograms, by the Patients Global Impressions Scale, and by a "free writing" task at baseline and after 4 weeks. RESULTS: TPM was discontinued in four patients due to adverse effects (sedation=2; cognitive impairment=2; increased aggressiveness=2; asthenia=1). During TPM, all patients improved. The mean tremor amplitude, compared with the baseline period, was reduced from 20% to 75%. After TPM, mean clinical scores of postural tremor and kinetic tremor decreased from 2.1+/-0.8 to 0.9+/-0.9 and from 2.1+/-1 to 1.4+/-1 (P<.05), respectively. All patients with head tremor improved. Writing, eating, and drawing were improved with TPM. Four patients chose to keep taking the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that TPM may be useful for the management of cerebellar tremors. A prospective placebo-controlled trial of TPM in this kind of tremor is warranted. TPM dosages should be titrated slowly to avoid the potential side effects of the drug. The range and the frequency of adverse events might limit the clinical usefulness of TPM.     

Rapid onset of action of levetiracetam in refractory epilepsy patients

PURPOSE: To investigate whether rapid achievement of levetiracetam (LEV) steady state is translated into an immediate measurable efficacy. The time to onset of action of LEV immediately after its initiation in adult patients with refractory partial seizures was analyzed. METHODS: Treatment effect was assessed in a pooled analysis (n=883) from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on trials. RESULTS: The increase in the proportion of seizure-free patients over baseline was 15, 17, and 17% for the first, second, and third day, respectively, for the LEV 1,000-mg group (all differences statistically significant; McNemar p value<0.001), whereas the increase was 7, 9, and 9% for the 333-mg LEV group (differences not significant). No major changes were observed for the placebo group. For differences in proportion of seizure-free patients between groups, the probability of being seizure free in the LEV groups was twofold higher than in the placebo group. For the 1,000-mg LEV group, odds ratios were 2.3, 2.5, and 2.7 for the first, second, and third day of therapy, respectively; all differences versus placebo were statistically significant (logistic regression p values, all <0.001). The addition of LEV significantly increased the proportion of patients without a seizure as of the first day of therapy. Each of the first 3 days, seizure freedom was twice as likely to occur with LEV 1,000 mg than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of a rapid onset of action of LEV 1,000 mg was demonstrated through a significant increase in the proportion of seizure-free patients as of the first day of therapy.     

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in selected patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, responder-selected study, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive oral LEV 1500 mg twice daily or placebo during a 12-week add-on phase. Treatment responders (patients with a reduction in partial seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with baseline) entered a monotherapy phase that included a maximum 12-week down-titration period and 12 weeks of monotherapy at 1500 mg twice daily. In both phases, responder rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (placebo, n = 105; LEV, n = 181) entered the add-on phase, and 86 patients (placebo, n = 17; LEV, n = 69) were eligible for the monotherapy phase. Thirty-six of 181 patients (19.9%) who received LEV completed the entire study compared with only 10 of 105 patients (9.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.029). The odds of completing the study on LEV were 2.36 times (95% confidence interval, 1.08, 5.57) higher than on placebo. The responder rate during the add-on phase was significantly higher in the LEV group compared with the placebo group (42.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the LEV monotherapy group, the median percent reduction in partial seizure frequency compared with baseline was 73.8% (p = 0.037), with a responder rate of 59.2%. Nine patients (18.4%) remained seizure-free on LEV monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to LEV monotherapy (1500 mg twice daily) is effective and well tolerated in patients with refractory partial seizures who responded to 3000 mg/d LEV as add-on therapy.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.     

Clinical Efficacy of Topiramate as Add-On Therapy in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: The European Experience

Summary: In three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on European trials, target daily topiramate (TPM) dosages of 400, 600, and 800 mg/day (200, 300, and 400 mg bid) were evaluated in adults with refractory partial seizures with or without becoming secondarily generalized. Median reductions from baseline in monthly seizure rate were 41% with TPM 400 mg/day vs. 1% with placebo ( n = 0.065), 46% with TPM 600 mg/day compared to -12% (a 12% increase) with placebo ( p ≤ 0.005), and 36% with TPM 800 mg/day versus –18% (an 18% increase) with placebo ( p ≤ 0.001). Differences between TPM and placebo with respect to percent responders (percent of patients demonstrating a 50% or greater reduction in seizures) significantly favored TPM ( p ≤ 0.05) at all three target dosages. Significant reductions in secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures compared to placebo were also observed with 400 mg/day ( p = 0.002) and 800 mg/day ( p < 0.05) of TPM. TPM appears to be a promising new antiepileptic drug for use as adjunctive therapy in adults with refractory partial epilepsy.