Diagnostic value of C4d in renal allograft biopsies in different clinical settings: absence of C4d in grafts from non-heart-beating donors

Humoral mechanisms of rejection after kidney transplantation (TX) can be identified through the detection of diffuse complement C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) in graft biopsies or donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in serum samples. It has been hypothesized that ischemic injury in the graft may facilitate humoral responses. Kidney grafts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) present more often severe ischemia lesions than grafts from heart-beating or living donors. METHODS: We reviewed kidney TX biopsies performed from May 2002 to November 2004 with special interest paid to recipients from NHBD. We checked corresponding frozen tissue for the detection of C4d in PTC using immunofluorescence with a monoclonal antibody against C4d. We also collected post-TX contemporaneous DSA data, either flow crossmatches or cytotoxic PRA. RESULTS: During this period, we performed 22 kidney TXs from NHBD of a total of 326 kidney TX (either single or combined with other grafts). Nine patients of this group underwent 12 biopsies for delayed graft function over 15 days or deteriorating scans. All biopsies showed acute tubular necrosis, but one also presented IA Banff acute rejection and another one had neutrophils in PTC. Frozen tissue from these 12 biopsies did not have diffuse C4d deposits in PTC. Serum samples of seven of nine patients were available: four had negative DSA flow crossmatches and three had 0% PRA within the same period. We diagnosed acute humoral rejection (AHR) in 13 patients-with acute renal dysfunction, C4d in biopsies and DSA after kidney TX-of 38 with high clinical suspicion for AHR. We detected C4d in seven biopsies of 30 patients performed more than 6 months after TX. CONCLUSIONS: Severe ischemic injury does not necessarily determine the activation of humoral mechanisms of rejection mediated through DSA. Therefore, C4d is extremely interesting for the identification of humoral rejection in any clinical setting after kidney TX.     

Diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection after kidney transplantation: preliminary experience

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection, or rejection associated with de novo production of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after kidney transplantation (KTx), is a clinicopathologic entity that is not completely understood. Recent studies have proposed criteria for its diagnosis, including: (1) steroid-resistant acute dysfunction; (2) positive post-Tx donor-specific crossmatch (XM); and (3) widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) upon renal biopsy. METHODS: During 2002, prospective screening for AHR was established at our unit, seeking DSA post-KTx in selected cases of steroid-resistant acute rejection or acute dysfunction in high-risk sensitized or re-Tx patients. Frozen donor lymphocytes were used for post-Tx flow cytometry (FC) XM and high-definition flow PRA for patients with no frozen donor cells. We treated patients diagnosed with DSA using plasma exchange and polyclonal immunoglobulin. RESULTS: Post-Tx DSA studies were performed in 9 of 94 patients transplanted during 2002. We detected DSA post-Tx in 3 of 9 recipients: 2 by FCXM and 1 using high-definition flow PRA. Two were highly sensitized pre-Tx, but the third patient was a 70-year-old woman receiving a first Tx (PRA=0%). All 3 recipients presented with severe steroid-resistant acute renal dysfunction during the first 2 weeks post-Tx. Biopsies showed some features of AHR (neutrophils in PTC); 1 case showed no signs of concomitant cellular rejection. All rejection episodes were treated successfully (XM became negative and renal function recovered) by combining plasma exchange and polyclonal immunoglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: The use of specific tools, like the crossmatch, in cases of acute, steroid-resistant renal graft dysfunction is important to identify and treat otherwise undetected humoral mechanisms of rejection.     

Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification

The incidence of acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal allograft biopsies has been difficult to determine because widely accepted diagnostic criteria have not been established. C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) of renal allografts has been proposed as a useful marker for AHR. This study was designed to test the relative value of C4d staining, histology, and serology in the diagnosis of AHR. Of 232 consecutive kidney transplants performed at a single institution from July 1995 to July 1999, all patients (n = 67) who developed acute rejection within the first 3 mo and had a renal biopsy with available frozen tissue at acute rejection onset, as well as posttransplant sera within 30 d of the biopsy, were included in this study. Hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stained sections were scored for glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial pathology. C4d staining of cryostat sections was done by a sensitive three-layer immunofluorescence method. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in posttransplant recipient sera using antihuman-globulin-enhanced T cell and B cell cytotoxicity assays and/or flow cytometry. Widespread C4d staining in PTC was present in 30% (20 of 67) of all acute rejection biopsies. The initial histologic diagnoses of the C4d(+) acute rejection cases were as follows: AHR only, 30%; acute cellular rejection (ACR) and AHR, 45%; ACR (CCTT types 1 or 2) alone, 15%; and acute tubular injury (ATI), 10%. The distinguishing morphologic features in C4d(+) versus C4d(-) acute rejection cases included the following: neutrophils in PTC, 65% versus 9%; neutrophilic glomerulitis, 55% versus 4%; neutrophilic tubulitis, 55% versus 9%; severe ATI, 75% versus 9%; and fibrinoid necrosis in glomeruli, 20% versus 0%, or arteries, 25% versus 0%; all P < 0.01. Mononuclear cell tubulitis was more common in the C4d(-) group (70% versus 100%; P < 0.01). No significant difference between C4d(+) and C4d(-) acute rejection was noted for endarteritis, 25% versus 32%; interstitial inflammation (mean % cortex), 27.2 +/- 27% versus 38 +/- 21%; interstitial hemorrhage, 25% versus 15%; or infarcts, 5% versus 2%. DSA were present in 90% (18 of 20) of the C4d(+) cases compared with 2% (1 of 47) in the C4d(-) acute rejection cases (P < 0.001). The pathology of the C4d(+) but DSA(-) cases was not distinguishable from the C4d(+), DSA(+) cases. The C4d(+) DSA(-) cases may be due to non-HLA antibodies or subthreshold levels of DSA. The sensitivity of C4d staining is 95% in the diagnosis of AHR compared with the donor-specific antibody test (90%). Overall, eight grafts were lost to acute rejection in the first year, of which 75% (6 of 8) had AHR. The 1-yr graft failure rate was 27% (4 of 15) for those AHR cases with only capillary neutrophils versus 40% (2 of 5) for those who also had fibrinoid necrosis of arteries. In comparison, the 1-yr graft failure rates were 3% and 7%, respectively, in ACR 1 (Banff/CCTT type 1) and ACR 2 (Banff/CCTT type 2) C4d(-) groups. A substantial fraction (30%) of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes have a component of AHR as judged by C4d staining; most (90%), but not all, have detectable DSA. AHR may be overlooked in the presence of ACR or ATI by histology or negative serology, arguing for routine C4d staining of renal allograft biopsies. Because AHR has a distinct therapy and prognosis, we propose that it should be classified separately from ACR, with further sub-classification into AHR 1 (neutrophilic capillary involvement) and AHR 2 (arterial fibrinoid necrosis).     

Therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by acute graft dysfunction associated with de novo production of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) and C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries of the renal allograft. It has been reported the combination of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) as effective rescue therapy for established AHR. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, seven kidney allografts recipients suffered from AHR diagnosed by severe rejection and C4d staining in peritubular capillaries. All patients had a negative cross-match before renal transplantation. RESULTS: All patients were treated with daily sessions of PP and in four cases IVIG was added after the last PP session. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were employed as maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In one case, rituximab was added to PP and IVIG owing to refractory humoral rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 100%, allograft survival was 70%, and the mean serum creatinine was 201 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: AHR is a severe form of rejection associated with a poor prognosis, but its early diagnosis and treatment with PP and IVIG allows reversal of AHR reaching a 70% graft survival at 1 year.     

Soluble CD30 concentrations in ESRD patients with and without panel reactive HLA antibodies

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study we compared accuracy of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) with serum soluble CD30 (sCD30) contents in predicting acute rejection crisis post-renal transplant. METHODS: Pre-transplant sera from 115 patients were evaluated for their PRA and sCD30 concentrations. All patients received calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy. Objective measurements for rejection were biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) episodes within first six months of the transplant. Post-transplant sera of patients with AR were tested for the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). RESULTS: Overall AR rate was 16% (18/115). Patients positive for PRA and sCD30 tests were at significantly higher risk for AVR compared with those patients negative for both the tests (36% vs. 5%, p=0.01). Among negative PRA patients risk for AR was significantly elevated if they were also tested positive for sCD30 concentrations (21% vs. 5%, p=0.04). Of the 18 patients with AR, 14 were positive for sCD30, and 13 of them (93%) developed DSA post-transplant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: These data showed that patients positive for sCD30 contents are at high risk for the development of DSA and AR post-transplant regardless of their pre-transplant PRA.     

Complement activation in acute humoral renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries.

The distinction between acute humoral rejection (AHR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) in renal allografts is therapeutically important, but pathologically difficult. Since AHR is probably mediated by antibodies to the donor endothelium that activate the classical complement pathway, it was hypothesized that peritubular capillary C4d deposition might distinguish this group. Renal biopsies (n = 16) from 10 patients with AHR who had acute graft dysfunction, neutrophils in peritubular capillaries, and a concurrent positive cross-match were stained for C4d by immunofluorescence. Control biopsies for comparison showed ACR (n = 14), cyclosporin A toxicity (n = 6), or no abnormality (n = 4). Peribiopsy sera were tested for anti-donor HLA antibody. C4d deposited prominently and diffusely in the peritubular capillaries in all AHR biopsies (16 of 16). IgM and/or C3 were also present in 19 and 44%, respectively. With two-color immunofluorescence, C4d was localized in basement membranes (type IV collagen+) and in the endothelium (Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I+). In ACR, no more than trace C4d was found in peritubular capillaries (P < 0.0001 versus AHR), and no patient had anti-donor HLA antibodies (0 of 8); 27% had neutrophils in peritubular capillaries. One of six biopsies with cyclosporin A toxicity had similar C4d deposits, and circulating anti-donor class I antibody was detected. Grafts with AHR were lost (40%) more often than those with ACR (0%; P < 0.02). C4d in peritubular capillary walls distinguishes AHR from ACR, is more specific and sensitive than traditional criteria, and is a potentially valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of graft dysfunction.     

Treatment of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin

BACKGROUND: Alloantibody-mediated acute rejection is a major cause of renal allograft loss despite aggressive therapy. Patients with humoral rejection can be identified with high sensitivity and specificity by the presence of peritubular capillary C4d staining on renal biopsy and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Standard therapy for acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been removal of donor-specific antibodies by plasmapheresis (PPH) in conjunction with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. We describe a series of seven patients with C4d positive AHR who received combined therapy with PPH and polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG). METHODS: PPH (1.4 volume exchange) was initiated on diagnosis of AHR on an alternate day basis for a mean number of 6.8 treatments, in conjunction with rATG (0.75 mg/kg/day 5-10 days) until the serum creatinine returned to 120% of nadir. RESULTS: The nadir posttreatment creatinine was significantly lower than pretreatment creatinine (1.0+/-1.2 vs. 2+/-1.4, P <0.007) with only one episode of graft loss. On follow-up there was no difference in renal allograft survival between the AHR group and the 60 patients without AHR who underwent transplantation during the same period. We describe the ability of rATG to induce apoptosis in vitro peripheral blood and activated B cells. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy using PPH and rATG is an effective means of reversing AHR in renal allografts.     

Complement activation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies after living-donor transplantation

BACKGROUND: To gain insight into complement activation in kidney grafts, we studied the deposition of components from all complement pathways in protocol biopsies from living-donor recipients that were taken 1 week (median 7 days) after transplantation. METHODS: Graft protocol biopsies (n=37) were taken consecutively and stained for two-color immunofluorescence, with antibodies to C4d, C3, C1q, factor B, C6, terminal C5b-9 complement complex, mannose-binding lectin (MBL), and MBL-associated serine protease-1, combined with an endothelial marker. Light and electron microscopy were performed in all cases. Clinical acute rejection (AR), graft loss, and long-term kidney function were recorded. Baseline biopsies from 15 of the patients served as controls. RESULTS: Endothelial C4d deposition was demonstrated in peritubular capillaries in 11 of 37 cases (30%), of which 9 of 11 (82%) experienced clinical AR but only 6 of 11 (55%) experienced AR as defined by histopathologic criteria. Biopsies from three patients, two with early graft loss, showed diffuse global C4d in the glomerular endothelium with codeposition of C3 in all patients and MBL-associated serine protease-1 in one patient. Focal peritubular capillary C3 deposition was found in two additional C4d-positive cases with AR. No posttransplant deposition was demonstrated for the other components. CONCLUSIONS: Early diffuse C4d deposition in the kidney graft capillaries is closely related to acute humoral rejection, whereas focal staining may occur with mild AR or, rarely, without rejection. Codeposition of C3 indicates early AR with a higher risk of graft loss. In most cases, activation was limited to C4d, indicating efficient in situ regulation of complement activation.     

Comparison of C4d Detection on Erythrocytes and PTC‐C4d to Histological Signs of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

C4d on erythrocytes (EC4d), C4d peritubular capillary deposition (PTC‐C4d) staining and histology were compared in a cross‐sectional cohort of 146 renal allograft biopsies (132 patients). EC4d levels paralleled PTC‐C4d staining, but were more predictive of peritubular capillaritis (PTC). Donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), PTC‐C4d, EC4d and PTC were analyzed in an independent longitudinal follow‐up cohort (96 biopsies, 76 patients). Seventy‐six samples were PTC and EC4d concordant, 11 positive and 65 negative, 7 PTC‐EC4d+ and 13 PTC+EC4d?. EC4d levels were related to DSA occurrence. With ABMR defined by PTC and DSA, all apparently discordant patients, EC4d negative, were correctly reassigned comparing EC4d level curves with rejection kinetics, with positive EC4d samples predating biopsy or late biopsies compared with ABMR flare‐ups. All EC4d‐positive patients without PTC or DSA had permanent high EC4d levels unrelated to rejection. EC4d was more abundant in PTC‐positive (mean = 108.5%± 3.4; n = 50) than PTC‐negative samples (mean = 88.1%± 1.3; n= 96; p < 0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PTC‐C4d and EC4d for PTC were, respectively, 75%, 79%; 64%, 76% (p < 0.05); 28%, 46% (p < 0.05) and 93%, 94%. Values were similar for DSA. A noninvasive blood test, EC4d, and particularly longitudinally monitoring EC4d levels, may increase surrogate ABMR testing options.     

Clearance of C4d deposition after successful treatment of acute humoral rejection in follow-up biopsies: a report of three cases

Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is currently perceived as an immunological reaction against donor antigens mediated by complement-binding antibodies. C4d, a split product of complement activation and bound to endothelial cells of the peritubular capillaries, is used as a diagnostic marker for AHR. We report on three patients with biopsy-proven acute humoral rejection who were treated initially with plasmapheresis (PS). As two of the patients did not recover renal function, and biopsy showed persistent C4d staining after PS, immunoadsorption (IAS) was additionally performed on them. In all patients, renal function recovered, and follow-up biopsies in two patients showed complete disappearance of C4d, 29 days and 58 days after transplantation and only minimal residual C4d deposits in one patient 48 days after transplantation. We conclude that successful treatment of AHR is followed by complete resolution of serological and histological markers of AHR, displayed by the disappearance of C4d.     

C4d peritubular capillary staining in chronic allograft nephropathy and transplant glomerulopathy: an uncommon finding

The true incidence of positive C4d staining in the peritubular capillaries of biopsies with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and transplant glomerulopathy (TGP) remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed all transplant biopsies performed at Saint Louis University Hospital between June 2002 and May 2004. We examined the incidence of positive C4d staining in the peritubular capillaries of biopsy specimens with pure CAN with or without features of TGP. We identified 54 biopsies in 43 patients showing CAN. The average age was 46 ± 13 years. The average creatinine at the time of biopsy was 308 ± 211 μmol/l (3.5 ± 2.4 mg/dl). Twenty (37%) biopsies exhibited features consistent with TGP. Only two biopsies had positive C4d staining in the peritubular capillaries. The C4d positive biopsies were from two different patients; one patient had donor specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA class 1 at the time of biopsy and the other patient had no detectable DSA. None of the TGP biopsies showed peritubular C4d staining. C4d staining of the peritubular capillaries appears to be rare in patients with pure CAN with and without TGP features.     

Acute renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of focal peritubular capillary C4d

BACKGROUND: Focal PTC C4d staining in acute renal allograft rejection has not been studied extensively. METHODS: Renal allograft biopsies performed after October 2003, representing the first episode of acute rejection (AR) in recipients with > or = 12 months follow-up postbiopsy, were assessed for extent of C4d and correlated with morphology, ELISA screen, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), response to treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: In 106 biopsies (16 C4d-diffuse; 24 C4d-focal; 66 C4d-negative), there were no differences among the three groups in terms of timing or grade of AR, creatinine level, tacrolimus level, and grade of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy or graft loss. The C4d-diffuse group was significantly associated with less tubulitis (P=0.0021), and more chronic allograft arteriopathy (P=0.0527). Incomplete response to steroid therapy was more frequent in C4d-diffuse/focal compared with negative cases (P=0.0492). DSA frequency within 1 year of AR was highest in the C4d-diffuse (94%), followed by C4d-focal (38%), and C4d-negative (17%) groups (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Focal PTC C4d was associated with circulating antibodies, with a 2-fold greater diagnostic sensitivity than negative C4d staining. The finding of diffuse C4d on follow-up biopsy was significantly associated with graft loss at 1 year, regardless of index biopsy C4d results.     

Endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior kidney allograft outcome independently of cellular rejection.

BACKGROUND: Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d has been suggested to be a valuable marker for humoral rejection. In this retrospective study we evaluated the clinical impact of C4d deposition in renal allografts with special emphasis on associations between C4d staining patterns and histological features of acute rejection. METHODS: One hundred and two allograft biopsies obtained from 61 kidney transplants (1-532 days after transplantation; median 14 days) were examined by immunohistochemistry on routine paraffin sections using a novel anti-C4d polyclonal antibody (C4dpAb). RESULTS: Fourty-two of 102 biopsies showed endothelial C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Histopathological analysis revealed a significantly lower frequency of positive C4d staining in biopsies with rather than in those without acute cellular rejection defined by the Banff grading schema (P<0.01). For clinical evaluation, patients were classified according to C4d staining in allografts (C4d(PTC) positive in at least one biopsy, n=31 vs C4d(PTC) negative in all biopsies, n=30). C4d(PTC) positive patients had significantly higher serum creatinine levels than C4d negative patients. Even in the absence of morphological evidence for rejection, differences in serum creatinine levels between C4d(PTC) positive and negative recipients were significant (6 months: 2.01+/-0.75 vs 1.41+/-0.27 mg/dl; 12 months: 1.95+/-0.60 vs 1.36+/- 0.34 mg/dl; 18 months: 1.98+/-0.50 vs 1.47+/-0.31 mg/dl; P<0.05). All patients with rejection resistant to conventional therapy (n=4) were in the C4d(PTC) positive subgroup. All recipients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >50% (n=8) were C4d(PTC) positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior graft outcome. We provide evidence that this immunohistochemical finding and its clinical impact are not associated with morphological signs of cellular rejection.     

C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: effective treatment by immunoadsorption.

There is increasing evidence for an important pathogenetic role of alloantibodies in acute renal allograft rejection. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been reported to be associated with a poor transplant survival. Although treatment modalities for cellular rejection are fairly well established, the optimal treatment for AHR remains undefined. Ten of 352 kidney allograft recipients transplanted at the authors' institution between November 1998 and September 2000 were diagnosed as having AHR, supported by severe graft dysfunction, C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC), and accumulation of granulocytes in PTC. AHR was diagnosed 18.9 +/- 17.5 d posttransplantation. All patients were subjected to immunoadsorption (IA) with protein A (median number of treatment sessions, 9; range, 3 to 17). Seven recipients with additional signs of cellular rejection (according to the Banff classification) received also antithymocyte globulin. In nine of ten patients, AHR was associated with an increase in panel reactive antibody reactivity. A pathogenetic role of alloantibodies was further supported by a positive posttransplant cytotoxic crossmatch in all tested recipients (n = 4). In nine of ten recipients, renal function recovered after initiation of anti-humoral therapy. One patient lost his graft shortly after initiation of specific therapy. Another recipient with partial reversal of AHR returned to dialysis 8 mo after transplantation. Mean serum creatinine in functioning grafts was 2.2 +/- 1.2 mg/dl after the last IA session (n = 9) and 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl after a follow-up of 14.2 +/- 7.1 mo (n = 8). In conclusion, this study suggests that AHR, characterized by severe graft dysfunction, C4d staining, and peritubular granulocytes, can be effectively treated by timely IA. In the majority of patients, IA treatment can restore excellent graft function over a prolonged time period.     

Acute Humoral Rejection in Hepatitis C-Infected Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Antiviral Therapy

The use of interferon-alpha (IFN) in hepatitis C (HCV)-infected renal recipients has been associated with acute rejection and graft loss. We reviewed our recent experience in HCV (+) renal recipients treated with antiviral therapy for biopsy proven chronic hepatitis C. Twelve HCV (+) recipients who recently received antiviral therapy were analyzed. Post-treatment sera were tested for donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA). Within 6 months of initiating antiviral therapy, two of 12 patients (17%) developed acute rejection, which was characterized as acute humoral rejection (de novo DSA in serum and C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries). Both progressed to graft failure. Nine of the remaining 10 patients tested did not have DSA. The use of IFN was associated with severe acute humoral rejection (C4d +, DSA +). The recognition of IFN-associated acute humoral rejection in this series may explain the high rate of graft loss reported previously in renal recipients receiving IFN.     

C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies

BACKGROUND: Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury. METHODS: To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation. RESULTS: Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs.CONCLUSIONS: C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.     

C4d-positive chronic rejection: a frequent entity with a poor outcome

BACKGROUND: Chronic rejection (CR) is an important cause of kidney graft loss. Some studies have suggested the role of antibodies mediating chronic graft dysfunction. In this context, C4d identification is an important tool to evaluate antibody-mediated rejection. METHOD: This is a retrospective study that analyzed 80 patients with histological diagnosis of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) according Banff 97 and no evidence of transplant glomerulopathy. These patients had renal biopsies available for C4d immunoperoxidase staining at the time of diagnosis. Cases were reclassified by the presence of C4d in peritubular capillaries. RESULTS: C4d was negative in 30 cases (37.5%) and positive in 50 (62.5%). C4d+ group had more female and highly sensitized patients (PRA) at transplant. All variables were similar between C4d- and C4d+ cases at diagnosis time, but more C4d+ patients presented proteinuria (>0.3 g/L). Patients were submitted to various immunosuppression regimens after the CAN diagnosis. Four years after the diagnosis, death-censored graft survival was 87% for C4d- and 50% for C4d+ (P=0.002). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, C4d+, PRA>10%, and vascular intimal proliferation were the variables that present higher relative risk for graft loss. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that C4d positive chronic rejection is very common, associated with proteinuria, and has a poor outcome. A larger study is warranted to identify which immunosuppressive regimen may modify the poor course of this entity.     

Prevalence and significance of anti-HLA and donor-specific antibodies long-term after renal transplantation

Post-transplant circulating anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-antibodies and C4d in allograft biopsies may be important in chronic rejection in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We determined the prevalence and significance of anti-HLA-antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Sera were collected from 251 RTR >6 months post-transplant. Sera were tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening for anti-HLA antibodies. Positive sera were retested with ELISA-specific panel for antibody specificity. A 11.2% of patients had anti-HLA antibodies and 4.4% had DSA. Anti-HLA antibodies were significantly associated with pretransplant sensitization, acute rejection and in multivariate analysis, higher serum creatinine (2.15 +/- 0.98 vs. 1.57 +/- 0.69 mg/dl in negative anti-HLA antibodies group). Allograft biopsies performed in a subset of patients with anti-HLA antibodies revealed that 66% had C4d in peritubular capillaries (0% in patients without antibodies). Anti-HLA antibodies were associated with a worse allograft function and in situ evidence of anti-donor humoral alloreactivity. Long-term RTR with an increase in creatinine could be screened for anti-HLA antibodies and C4d in biopsy.     

Pretransplant soluble CD30 is a better predictor of posttransplant development of donor-specific antibodies and acute vascular rejection than panel reactive antibodies

BACKGROUND: This study tests a hypothesis that pretransplant concentration of soluble CD30 (sCD30) is a better predictor of posttransplant development of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and acute vascular rejection (AVR) than panel reactive HLA antibodies (PRA). METHODS: Pretransplant sera from 115 patients were evaluated for their PRA and sCD30 concentrations. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor based immunosuppressive therapy. Objective measurements for rejection were biopsy-proven AVR episodes within first 6 months of the transplant. Posttransplant sera of patients with or without AVR were tested for the presence of DSA. RESULTS: AVR rate was 16% (18/115). Patients positive for PRA and sCD30 tests were at significantly higher risk for AVR compared to those patients negative for both tests (36% versus 5%, p = 0.01). Among negative PRA patients risk for AR was significantly elevated if they were also tested positive for sCD30 concentrations (21% versus 5%, p = 0.04). Of the 18 patients with AVR, 14 were positive for sCD30, and 13 of them (93%) developed DSA posttransplant (p = 0.001) Nineteen patients without AVR were tested for DSA and sCD30 concentrations. Only two of these 19 patients were positive for sCD30 and DSA. AVR was strongly associated with the patients tested positive for both the tests: DSA and sCD30 (p = 0.00007). Furthermore, patients with AVR are more likely to produce DSA than those without AVR (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: These data support our hypothesis that patients positive for sCD30 contents are at high risk the development of DSA and AVR posttransplant regardless of their pretransplant PRA.     

C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: rescue therapy by immunoadsorption in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) of renal transplants. METHODS: Six of 185 cadaveric renal allograft recipients developed AHR at a mean of 4.8 +/- 0.8 days after the operation. C4d deposits were observed in peritubular capillaries (PTC) with accumulation of granulocytes. IA with staphylococcal protein A and FK506-MMF combination therapy were administered. RESULTS: After treatment with IA for 6.3 +/- 1.03 sessions combined with FK506 (0.14 to 0.16 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)) and MMF (1.5 g/d) therapy, renal function recovered in all the patients. The mean duration of treatment to a serum creatinine decrease was 14 +/- 2.9 days. The pre-IA panel reactive antibody reactivity (PRA) peaked at 50.2% +/- 6.1%, and was significantly reduced to 8.3% +/- 2.9% after IA. In four of six patients repeat allograft biopsy revealed a remission of AHR. With a mean follow-up of 18.8 +/- 5.46 months, patient and allograft survival are 100% and renal function remains stable with a mean serum creatinine of 1.2 +/- 0.22 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment for alloantibody-mediated AHR remains uncertain. Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining IA and FK506-MMF rescue improves the outcome of AHR.