Validation of the Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ-12) in community elders

There has been no validated screening instrument for use in non-psychotic illness of the elderly in Taiwan. This study aims to test the validity of the 12-item Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ-12) among the elderly in a community study. The CHQ-12 was administrated via reading-out to 222 subjects aged 65 and over from three communities. Psychiatrists using the Geriatric Mental Status Schedule (GMS) assessed psychiatric condition while the diagnosis was made according to the computerized program, AGECAT. Validity indices of the CHQ-12 were calculated, using the Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for its optimal cut-off point. Variables hypothesized to affect its performance were assessed. Validity of the CHQ-12 at optimal cut-off point 2/3 were estimated with a sensitivity of 79.7%, a specificity of 83.6%, a positive predictive value of 68.9%, a negative predictive value of 90.0% and an overall misclassification rate of 17.6%, and an estimate of the area under the ROC curve of 0.81. The performance of the CHQ-12 was better in males, in those who were literate, and in those without any physical illness. This study demonstrated that the use of CHQ-12 in the elderly community is as valid as in the general population survey. However, it should be read out by the investigator rather than self-administered due to the high proportion of illiteracy among the Taiwanese elderly.     

Validation of the Spanish version of a screening questionnaire for the detection of systemic lupus erythematosus

the aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the translation of a screening questionnaire for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Spanish-speaking populations. The questionnaire was applied to secondary-care outpatients in a rheumatology clinic. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive and negative values of the instrument, and the best cut-off point to discriminate between SLE patients and other conditions, were determined. Fifty-two subjects answered the questionnaire (21 patients with SLE, 15 with a possible diagnosis of SLE who eventually proved not to have the disease, and 16 healthy volunteers), which can be answered in 2 min. The best cut-off point was three affirmative answers (95% specificity, 84% sensitivity, 80% predictive positive and 96% predictive negative values). The questionnaire can discriminate between SLE cases and other conditions. Sensitivity and specificity are close to those of the original English version. Applying this instrument can help to acquire informed estimates of SLE prevalence.Abbreviations ANA Antinuclear antibody - NPV Negative predictive value - PPV Positive predictive value - SLE Systemic lupus erythematosus     

The frailty dilemma. Review of the predictive accuracy of major frailty scores

BackgroundTo identify frail elderly individuals, several index or scoring systems have been developed for research purposes. The practical value of these scores for screening and diagnostic use is uncertain.AimThe available scoring systems were reviewed to determine whether they can be used in daily practice.MethodsLiterature study on relevant test instruments developed for the detection of frailty on the basis of theoretical views on the frailty concept. Data on sensitivity and specificity and predictive values were extracted.ResultsSeveral (n = 6) frailty scores were described with respect to their value as a screening or diagnostic test. Outcome of the selected test instruments is presented as a risk of negative health outcome when a test is positive. The reported AUCs of ROCs varied from 0.55 for functional decline in people admitted to an accident and emergency department to 0.87 for prediction of mortality on the basis of a co-morbidity score. As the prevalence of frailty and resulting negative health outcomes in published reports was low (5–41%), presented sensitivity and specificity values lead to low positive predictive values (6–49%) but reasonable negative predictive values (73–96%).ConclusionsAs the number of false positive values of most available tests is substantial, these frailty scores are of limited value for both screening and diagnostic purposes in daily practice. As diagnostic instruments they can best be used to exclude frailty. The false-positive rate of currently available tests is too high to allow major decisions on medical care to be made on the basis of a positive test.     

Psychiatric screening of alcohol and drug patients: the validity of the GHQ-60

The 60-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) were administered to 501 patients presenting for assessment or treatment of alcohol or drug problems at the Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Canada. The GHQ proved to be a useful, if limited, instrument for routine screening for psychiatric disorders other than substance abuse in this population. The sensitivity or "utility" of the test at the optimum threshold score was considerably lower in this sample than in medical or community samples. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis suggests a need for an upward revision of the cut-off score to 23/24 inpatients with alcohol or drug problems. At this threshold, sensitivity was 69%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 77%, negative predictive value 66%, and overall misclassification rate 29%. A definition of "caseness" was used that included all DIS Axis I disorders with the exception of substance use and "cognitive impairment." Sensitivity of the GHQ was highest for the affective disorders (79%). False negatives accounted for the bulk (61%) of the misclassification rate. At the threshold score of 23/24, positive predictive values were greater for the unemployed and for patients with either no current substance use disorder or with both alcohol and drug disorders.     

The value of CAGE, CUGE, and AUDIT in screening for alcohol abuse and dependence among college freshmen

BACKGROUND: This study attempted to (1) determine the prevalence of alcohol problems in college freshmen, (2) assess the performance of both the CAGE and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaires in this population, and (3) assess the possibility of improving the CAGE and/or AUDIT. METHODS: A sample of 3564 consecutive college freshmen, with a mean age of 18 years, at the Catholic University of Leuven, (Belgium) completed, during a cross-sectional study, a questionnaire assessing drinking behavior and identifying students at risk as defined by DSM-IV criteria. The questionnaire also included the CAGE questionnaire and the AUDIT. Calculations of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves for different scores of the CAGE and the AUDIT were performed, using DSM-IV criteria as the reference standard. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CAGE and the AUDIT was 0.76 and 0.85, respectively. The cutoff score of 1 for the CAGE was associated with a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 87%, a positive predictive value of 36%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. A score of 6 or more for the AUDIT gave a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 78%, a positive predictive value of 37%, and a negative predictive value of 77%. These results were related with a prevalence of 14.1% of alcohol problems. Replacing one question of the CAGE by "often driving under the influence" resulted in the CUGE (acronym for "cut down, under influence, guilty feelings, and eye opener"), with an area under the curve of 0.96, a positive likelihood ratio of 8.7, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of alcohol problems in college students is confirmed to be high. When screening for alcohol problems in a college freshmen population, one question seems extremely important. The newly constructed CUGE questionnaire may improve screening efforts in students, compared with existing questionnaires.     

Occupational screening for sleep disorders in 12-h shift nurses using the Berlin Questionnaire

Background

The Berlin Questionnaire has been validated as a screening tool for sleep apnea in clinical samples, but no occupational studies have reported screening validity parameters for this instrument. The objectives of this pilot study were to describe the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing symptoms in registered nurses and examine the validity of the Berlin Questionnaire to screen for sleep apnea in this chronically partially sleep-deprived group. Validity parameters for the Berlin Questionnaire are tabulated for published studies to 2012.

Methods

Twenty-one female nurses working full time 12-h shifts underwent overnight, in-laboratory polysomnography to identify sleep disorders and completed a Berlin Questionnaire.

Results

By polysomnogram, the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing [Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI)?≥?5] was 43 %, although by the Berlin Questionnaire only 24 % were deemed high risk. The sensitivity of the Berlin Questionnaire to detect high-risk subjects (RDI?>?5) was 0.33, with a specificity of 0.83, a positive predictive value of 0.60, and negative predictive value of 0.63. Berlin criterion 3 (obesity or hypertension) performed the best for predicting sleep apnea in 12-h shift nurses.

Conclusions

Although the Berlin Questionnaire produced valuable data about symptoms of sleep apnea in this population, it had a high proportion of false negatives. To improve its sensitivity for screening health care workers for sleep apnea, it must better capture symptoms specific to this population. Increasing the weighting of Berlin criterion 3 items should be considered to improve its psychometric properties.     

Psychiatric Screening of Alcohol and Drug Patients: The Validity of the GHQ-60

The 60-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) were administered to 501 patients presenting for assessment or treatment of alcohol or drug problems at the Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Canada. The GHQ proved to be a useful, if limited, instrument for routine screening for psychiatric disorders other than substance abuse in this population. The sensitivity or “utility” of the test at the optimum threshold score was considerably lower in this sample than in medical or community samples. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis suggests a need for an upward revision of the cut-off score to 23/24 inpatients with alcohol or drug problems. At this threshold, sensitivity was 697%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 77%, negative predictive value 66%, and overall misclassification rate 29%. A definition of “caseness” was used that included all DIS Axis I disorders with the exception of substance use and “cognitive impairment.” Sensitivity of the GHQ was highest for the affective disorders (79%). False negatives accounted for the bulk (61%) of the misclassification rate. At the threshold score of 23/24, positive predictive values were greater for the unemployed and for patients with either no current substance use disorder or with both alcohol and drug disorders.     

Comparison of an rK39 dipstick rapid test with direct agglutination test and splenic aspiration for the diagnosis of kala-azar in Sudan

We compared an rK39 dipstick rapid test (Amrad ICT, Australia) with a direct agglutination test (DAT) and splenic aspirate for the diagnosis of kala-azar in 77 patients. The study was carried out under field conditions in an endemic area of north-east Sudan. The sensitivity of the rK39 test compared with splenic aspiration was 92% (46/50), the specificity 59% (16/27), and the positive predictive value 81% (46/57). Compared with the diagnostic protocol used by Médecins sans Frontières, the sensitivity of the rK39 test was 93% (50/54), the specificity 70% (16/23), and the positive predictive value 88% (50/57). Compared with splenic aspirates, the sensitivity of a DAT with a titre > or =1:400 was 100% (50/50), but its specificity only 55% (15/27) and the positive predictive value was 80% (50/62). Using a DAT titre > or =1:6400, the sensitivity was 84% (42/50), the specificity 85% (23/27) and the positive predictive value 91% (42/46). All four patients with DAT titre > or =1:6400 but negative splenic aspirate were also rK39 positive; we consider these are probably 'true' cases of kala-azar, i.e. false negative aspirates, rather than false DAT and rK39 seropositives. There were no false negative DATs (DAT titre < or =1:400 and aspirate positive), but there were four false negative rK39 tests (rK39 negative and aspirate positive). The rK39 dipstick is a good screening test for kala-azar; but further development is required before it can replace the DAT as a diagnostic test in endemic areas of the Sudan.     

Development and validation of a brief observer-rated screening scale for depression in elderly medical patients

OBJECTIVE: to develop a depression screening scale that does not rely on verbal communication. SETTING: an acute geriatric unit in a teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: 96 patients (mean age 81 years, range 68-92, 59 women); 40% of the initial study group of 50 and 22% of the validation group of 46 were diagnosed as depressed. METHODS: we devised a scale using nine items which could be rated by an observer; we determined inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for each item compared with a Geriatric Mental State-AGECAT diagnosis of depression; we validated a final scale of six items. RESULTS: inter-rater reliability was poor for two items (irritability and sleep disturbance) while two items (sleep disturbance and night sedation) had poor sensitivity; we omitted these items in a revised scale. Re-analysis of data from the initial study showed that a cut-off of > or = 3 on the revised scale gave a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 0.89 and a negative predictive value of 0.90. Spearman's correlation coefficient between the six-item questionnaire and the Hamilton rating scale was 0.79. In the validation study, the cut-off score of > or = 3 on the revised six-item scale had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 72%, a positive predictive value of 0.69 and a negative predictive value of 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: this simple, short, observation-based screening scale completed by nurses is sensitive and specific in identifying depression in elderly medically ill patients, and may be a useful addition to clinical practice.     

A screening instrument for a Sicilian neuroepidemiological survey in the elderly

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a screening instrument developed for use in a two-phase neuroepidemiological survey in Sicily. The Sicilian Epidemiological Dementia Study (SEDES) project will evaluate the prevalence and incidence of dementia, parkinsonisms and essential tremor in four Sicilian municipalities. It is a two-phase door-to-door survey. To identify subjects with possible neurological disorders, in this study, we developed a screening instrument including a symptoms questionnaire and simple physical tasks for parkinsonisms and essential tremor. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was chosen for screening dementia. The symptoms questionnaire and simple tasks developed to identify possible patients with parkinsonism and essential tremor, was tested in a hospital setting. To evaluate sensitivity, we selected 20 patients with essential tremor and 40 with Parkinson's disease (20 with Stages I-II and 20 with Stages III-V) [Neurology 17 (1967) 427]. To evaluate specificity we also selected 20 healthy subjects. The screening instrument was administered in a hospital setting by trained interviewers. Sensitivity of the screening instrument (questionnaire plus simple tasks) was 100% for essential tremor and parkinsonisms regardless of the stage. Specificity of the instrument was 90% (95% CI 66.9-98.2); the predictive positive value was 90.9%, while the negative predictive value was 100%. Even if validity was assessed in a hospital setting, the high sensitivity and specificity obtained suggest that the instrument could be an appropriate screening tool for parkinsonisms and essential tremor in a two-phase neuroepidemiological survey.     

Validity of duplex ultrasound as a diagnostic modality for internal carotid artery disease.

There is an increasing trend to rely on duplex ultrasound rather than angiography to measure an internal carotid artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of ultrasound assessment of carotid stenosis performed in community based vascular laboratories. We compared ultrasound with angiography in 225 patients referred to us for carotid intervention. Mild lesions were diagnosed by ultrasound with a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 89%, and a positive predictive value of 89% compared with angiography. Severe lesions had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 67%, and a positive predictive value of 45%. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated the optimal ultrasound cut-off value of 66% stenosis as a predictor of >60% stenosis measured angiographically, is associated with a false positive rate of 38%, and a false negative rate of 9%. Similarly, if a cut-off of 76% on ultrasound is used to predict >70% stenosis measured angiographically, it would be associated with a 29% false positive rate and a false negative rate of 11%. Despite the value of non-invasive testing for carotid disease, duplex ultrasonography performed in non-accredited and some accredited laboratories may produce highly variable results. Using ultrasound as the sole diagnostic test to determine the severity of a carotid stenosis may result in a high number of inappropriate operations and a large proportion of patients who may not be offered treatment due to false negative diagnoses.     

Analysis of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Noninvasive Imaging Tests for the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis

Background

Aging and atherosclerosis are related to renovascular hypertension in elderly individuals. Regardless of comorbidities, renal artery stenosis is itself an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To define the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of noninvasive imaging tests used in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Methods

In a group of 61 patients recruited, 122 arteries were analized, thus permitting the definition of sensitivity, specificity, and the relative contribution of each imaging study performed (Doppler, scintigraphy and computed tomographic angiography in comparison to renal arteriography).

Results

The mean age was 65.43 years (standard deviation: 8.7). Of the variables related to the study population that were compared to arteriography, two correlated with renal artery stenosis, renal dysfunction and triglycerides. The median glomerular filtration rate was 52.8 mL/min/m². Doppler showed sensitivity of 82.90%, specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 85% and negative predictive value of 66.70%. For tomography, sensitivity was 66.70%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 87.50% and negative predictive value 55.20%. With these findings, we could identify the imaging tests that best detected stenosis.

Conclusion

Tomography and Doppler showed good quality and efficacy in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis, with Doppler having the advantage of not requiring the use of contrast medium for the assessment of a disease that is common in diabetics and is associated with renal dysfunction and severe left ventricular dysfunction.     

尿胰蛋白酶原-2检测对急性胰腺炎的诊断价值

目的评价免疫层析法检测尿胰蛋白酶原-2在急性胰腺炎（acute pancreatitis,AP）中的应用价值。方法对134例急性腹痛病例进行尿胰蛋白酶原-2及血、尿淀粉酶的检测,并比较其敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值及准确度。结果30例AP患者中28例尿胰蛋白酶原-2阳性,敏感性为93．3％,血清淀粉酶检测的敏感性为86．7％（26／30）,尿淀粉酶检测的敏感性为83．3％（25／30）;104例其他急腹症中,8例尿胰蛋白酶原-2阳性,特异性为92．3％。血清淀粉酶检测的特异性为87．5％（91／104）;尿淀粉酶检测的特异性为85．6％（89／104）。尿胰蛋白酶原-2检测敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值及准确度均最高,但三者之间差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论尿胰蛋白酶原-2是急腹症患者筛选AP快速而简便的方法,具有较高的特异性和敏感性。     

A nutritional screening test for use in children and adolescents with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) has been demonstrated in about 35% of patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), but fewer than 8% of children with rheumatic diseases were reported in a national survey to have been seen by a pediatric dietitian. We demonstrate the development of a nutritional screening test for PEM in patients with JRA for use by all health care professionals. Nutritional assessment of 74 patients with JRA was conducted using a standardized 11 variable profile comprised of upper body anthropometric and biochemical measurements. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and index of validity were calculated for individual and selected clusters of nutritional variables to predict the need for referral for PEM compared to the independent review by 2 pediatric dietitians to refer or not refer to a dietitian for further evaluation or care. Arm circumference less than or equal to 10th percentile for age and sex matched norms was selected as the screening test for PEM in patients with JRA due to a combination of excellent measurement characteristics (sensitivity 0.80, specificity 0.86, positive predictive value 0.90, negative predictive value 0.73, index of validity 0.88) and ease of measurement.     

Performance value of high risk factors in colorectal cancer screening in China

AIM: To analyze the performance value of high risk factors in population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in China. METHODS: We compared the performance value of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and other high risk factors questionnaire in a population sample of 13 214 community residents who completed both the iFOBT and questionnaire investigation. Patients with either a positive iFOBT and/or questionnaire were regarded as a high risk population and those eligible were asked to undergo colonoscopy. RESULTS: The iFOBT had the highest positive predictive value and negative predictive value in screening for advanced neoplasia. The iFOBT had the highest sensitivity, lowest number of extra false positive results associated with the detection of one extra abnormality for screening advanced neoplasias and adenomas. A history of chronic cholecystitis or cholecystectomy, chronic appendicitis or appendectomy, and chronic diarrhea also had a higher sensitivity than a history of adenomatous polyps in screening for advanced neoplasias and adenomas. The sensitivity of a history of chronic cholecystitis or cholecystectomy was highest among the 10 high risk factors in screening for nonadenomatous polyps. A history of chronic appendicitis or appendectomy, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea, mucous and bloody stool, CRC in first degree relatives, malignant tumor and a positive iFOBT also had higher sensitivities than a history of adenomas polyps in screening for non-adenomatous polyps. Except for a history of malignant tumor in screening for non-adenomatous polyps, the gain in sensitivity was associated with an increase in extra false positive results associated with the detection of one extra abnormality. CONCLUSION: The iFOBT may be the best marker for screening for advanced neoplasias and adenomas. Some unique high risk factors may play an important role in CRC screening in China.     

中文版成瘾严重程度指数量表作为精神症状筛查工具的可行性研究

目的探讨中文版成瘾严重程度指数量表(ASI-C),作为吸毒成瘾者精神症状筛查工具的可行性。方法首先对符合入组条件的71名参加针具交换的注射吸毒者使用ASI-C,进行精神心理障碍的初步筛查,然后采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)作为标准进行诊断,将ASI-C精神心理障碍的筛查效能与SCL-90对精神心理障碍的诊断结果进行比较。结果 71名注射吸毒者使用SCL-90筛查精神心理障碍的发生率为62.0%(44/71)。ASI-C总诊断符合率为73.2%,灵敏度79.5%,特异度63.0%,阳性预测值77.8%,阴性预测值65.4%,假阳性率37.0%,假阴性率20.5%。结论 ASI-C对精神心理障碍具有较好的识别率,可以作为精神心理障碍的筛查工具。     

Validation of a questionnaire instrument for prediction of obstructive sleep apnea in Hong Kong Chinese children

To develop and validate a questionnaire scale that can be used as a screening tool to investigate for the presence of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in Hong Kong Chinese children. Subjects suspected to have OSAS and controls were recruited. Parents completed a Hong Kong children sleep questionnaire (HK-CSQ) and all recruited subjects underwent at least one overnight polysomnographic study (PSG). An obstructive apnea index (OAI) >or= 1/h was diagnostic of OSAS. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to determine optimal sensitivity and specificity. Reliability and validity of the questionnaire scale were also assessed. Two hundred twenty-nine children (149 boys and 80 girls) with a mean age of 10.0 years (SD = 2.1) were recruited. Their mean body mass index (BMI) and OAI were 19.8 (SD = 5.1) and 2.6 (SD = 7.6), respectively. Fifty-four boys and 12 girls were found to have OSAS. Three questions were found to be highly significant in predicting for the presence of OSAS-snoring, nocturnal mouth breathing, and sweating. A composite score of 7 from the three questions (range 0-12) was found to discriminate the OSAS cases best [ROC curve, AUC = 0.8 (95% CI = 0.8-0.9)]. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 75.4, 80.5, 61.3, and 88.9%, respectively. Test-retest reliability was undertaken in 51 subjects and the measurement of agreement (Kappa value) was 0.6. This HK-CSQ is a useful, valid, and reliable screening instrument for the presence of OSAS in children.     

Assessment of a simple scoring system applied to a screening questionnaire of asthma in children aged 5-15 yrs.

The aim of the present study was to validate a simple scoring system using a parent-completed screening questionnaire to identify children aged 5-15 yrs who may have asthma. A stratified random sample of 157 children of 1,808 whose parents had answered a postal respiratory questionnaire underwent detailed clinical evaluation. The results were reviewed by three independent paediatricians whose opinions were combined to reach, for each child, decisions regarding three standards: 1) "possible asthma" defined as >50% likelihood of having asthma; 2) "possible asthma" defined as meriting a clinical trial of asthma medication; and 3) "probable asthma" defined as >90% likelihood of having asthma. The combined decisions were compared to three sets of questionnaire scores, in order to determine the positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of each set in identifying children with probable/possible asthma. The three sets of chosen questionnaire scores all had positive predictive values of 79-96% for predicting possible asthma, using either the combined expert opinion ">50% likelihood of asthma" or that of "warrants a trial of treatment" as the definition. This suggests that a low proportion of false positives would be obtained were this scoring system to be used for a screening programme. The combined decision >90% chance of asthma could be used as a means of estimating prevalence of asthma in the survey. When used for this, the prevalence of asthma in the surveyed population was 18.8% (95% confidence interval 13.1-26.3). In conclusion, the present scoring system, based on a simple respiratory questionnaire, provides a valid method of identifying children likely to have asthma, and who, if unknown to the medical services, would benefit from clinical review.     

Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires

Two psychiatric screening instruments were applied to a sample of attenders (n = 875) in three primary medical care clinics in the city of Sao Paulo. The two questionnaires were validated in a subsample (n = 260) against the Clinical Interview Schedule [8]. The effect of sociodemographic variables on misclassification (by both questionnaires) was investigated using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and linear logistic modelling. Both these techniques proved to be useful in this regard, and it is recommended that they be more widely used in screening studies. Sex and educational level exerted important influences on misclassification. In general, men were more likely than women to be classified as false negative, while poorly educated respondents were more likely to be classified as false positive. These results are interpreted in an illness-behavior context.     

Evaluation of Rapid Neutralizing Antibody Detection Test against Rabies Virus in Human Sera

Rapid and easy determination of protective neutralization antibody (NAb) against rabies in the field is very important for an early and effective response to rabies in both animal and human health sectors. The rapid neutralizing antibody detection test (RAPINA), first developed in 2009 and then improved in 2012, is a quick test allowing detection of 0.5 IU/ml antibodies in human and animal sera or plasma. This study aimed to assess the RAPINA test by comparison with rapid focus fluorescence inhibition test (RFFIT), using 214 sera of vaccinated and unvaccinated professional dog butchers, laboratory workers and rabies patients in Vietnam. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, false positive rate and concordance of the RAPINA test as compared to RFFIT were 100%, 98.34%, 0%, 1.66% and 98.6%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 91.7% and 100%, respectively when RAPINA test was used. With its remarkable sensitivity, specificity and easy implementation, RAPINA test can be used for rapid determination of NAb in the field.