Allergic sensitization and clinical reactions to latex, food and pollen in adult patients

BACKGROUND: Many latex-allergic patients are sensitized to one or more foods. Patients allergic to tree and/or grass pollens are also often sensitized to plant-derived foods. Atopy, defined in most studies as sensitivity to an aeroallergen, is a risk factor for latex allergy. The relative importance of pollen sensitivity, a sign of atopy, as a risk factor for food allergy in latex-allergic patients has not, however, been examined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between pollen sensitivity and sensitivity to food in latex-allergic patients. METHODS: Forty-four latex-allergic patients (Groups 1 and 2), 24 of whom were also allergic to tree and/or grass pollen (Group 1) and 25 pollinosis patients who were not allergic to latex (Group 3) were studied. We obtained a history of reactions to food and skin tested them with 12 fresh-frozen fruits. RESULTS: All 12 foods induced a skin test reaction in at least one patient in each of the three Groups. There were, however, twice as many positive skin test reactions to food in patients with pollinosis, whether or not they were allergic to latex, as there were in patients allergic to latex but not to pollen. Latex-allergic patients were most likely to have a positive skin test and a history of a reaction to avocado or banana whereas patients with pollinosis only were most likely to have a positive skin test and a history of a reaction to apple, peach or celery. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that concomitant allergy to pollen is an important risk factor in determining which plant-derived foods sensitize latex-allergic patients.     

Lettuce anaphylaxis: identification of a lipid transfer protein as the major allergen

BACKGROUND: Allergy to plant-derived foods is associated with birch pollinosis in central and northern Europe. Symptoms elicited are usually limited to the oropharyngeal system. By contrast, in the Mediterranean area, allergy to the same foods manifests more frequently with systemic reactions caused by nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP), independently of an associated pollinosis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the pattern of immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding protein bands implicated in lettuce allergy, in particular the presence of an nsLTP. METHODS: Consecutive lettuce allergic patients were selected. Determination of serum-specific IgE, immunoblot, and inhibition experiments were performed in order to study the pattern of IgE binding proteins and the potential cross-reactivity to pollens. Inhibition studies with recombinant allergens were conducted to identify the lettuce allergens. The major allergen was subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequencing. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were diagnosed as being allergic to lettuce. All were sensitized to Platanus pollen. Ten of them showed specific IgE to a lettuce protein of 9-kDa. The IgE binding to this protein was completely inhibited by the cherry-LTP and peach extract. The N-terminal sequence of the 9-kDa protein showed a high degree of amino acid sequence identity to other nsLTPs. A clear partial cross-reactivity was observed between lettuce-LTP and Platanus-pollen extract. CONCLUSIONS: An LTP has been demonstrated to be a major allergen in patients suffering from lettuce allergy.     

Oral allergy syndrome due to plant-derived foods: a clinical review of 63 patients over a period of 6 years]

BACKGROUND: The clinical features of many patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) due to plant-derived foods have rarely been reported in Japan. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the causative foods of OAS due to plant-derived foods based on clinical features and skin prick tests (SPTs). Furthermore, we aimed to elucidate the association between causative foods and sensitized pollens in patients with OAS due to plant-derived foods. METHODS: SPTs and specific IgE measurements (CAP-FEIA: CAP) were performed in relation to foods and pollens in 118 patients with positive histories of OAS due to plant-derived foods. Patients with positive histories and with positive skin test responses were identified as having type I allergy to the causative foods. RESULTS: The mean age of 63 patients with positive histories and positive skin test responses was 29.2 years (range, 2-61 years), and there were twice as many females as male. The most frequent causative foods were found to be apple, peach, kiwi, and melon in 13, 12, 12, and 11 patients, respectively. CAP frequency was shown to be similar to that of SPT regarding apple, whereas it was less than that of SPT regarding melon, peach, and kiwi. A significant correlation between the frequencies of SPT and CAP was found regarding apple (r=0.39, p<0.05) but not peach, kiwi, and melon. Forty-one of 63 patients with OAS (66.1%) had pollinosis and/or allergic rhinitis. In patients with OAS due to apple, the positive ratio of CAP response against alder pollen was higher than that in patients with OAS due to melon. In patients with OAS due to melon, the positive ratio of CAP responses against ragweed pollen, grass pollen, and mugwort pollen was higher than that in patients with OAS due to apple. CONCLUSION: In this study, positive ratios of SPT and CAP tended to differ according to the causative food, showing a smaller potential for reaction than might be suggested by patient history. Therefore, for the time being it would be more accurate to use a skin test for the diagnosis of OAS due to plant-derived foods.     

Relationship between Bet v 1 and Bet v 2 specific IgE and food allergy in children with grass pollen respiratory allergy

Grass allergy is the most common pollinosis in Northern Italy. Some patients with grass allergy show polysensitization against other pollens and plant-derived foods. In these patients oral allergic syndrome (OAS) is frequently associated. To evaluate the correlation between food allergy or food sensitization and specific IgE against panallergens such as Bet v 1 and Bet v 2, we studied 56 children (mean age: 8 years 5 months) suffering from respiratory allergy due to grass pollens were enrolled. Specific IgE against the most important food, inhalant allergen and Bet v 1, Bet v 2 were performed by ImmunoCAP technology (UniCAP 1000, Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden). We found 14 children (25%) sensitized to Bet v 1 and 13 (23%) to Bet v 2; in 24 cases (42.3%) a sensitization to at least one of the 2 panallergens was observed. Five of the 14 cases (36%) sensitized to Bet v 1 showed food allergy and 8 (57%) food sensitization; 6 (46%) of the 13 children sensitized to Bet v 2 showed food allergy and 7 (54%) food sensitization; only one case of Bet v 1 specific IgE without food allergy or sensitization was seen. Sixteen subjects (29%) showed food allergy (group A); 20 children (35.5%) multiple sensitizations to inhalant and at least one plant-derived food (group B); 20 subjects (35.5%) only inhalant allergens (group C). Sensitization to Bet v 1 (P<0.03) and Bet v 2 (P<0.009) is from a statistical point of view significantly higher in groups A and B than in group C. In the 16 patients with food allergy hazelnut was the major triggering food (50%), followed by peanut (38%), kiwi (31%), apple and walnut (19%). Specific IgE for Bet v 1 is more associated with nuts and legumes, while Bet v 2 is more related to fresh fruit and vegetables. In conclusion grass pollinosis is frequently associated with polysensitization to other pollen and food allergens. Bet v 1 and Bet v 2 specific IgE are significantly higher in these patients than in patients with grass monosensitization, and this sensitization may be considered a possible risk factors to evolve later into food allergy. Among the offending foods, legumes and the nut group are mostly related to Bet v 1, while vegetables and fresh fruits to Bet v 2.     

Primary sensitization to sweet bell pepper pollen in greenhouse workers with occupational allergy

BACKGROUND: In a previous investigation, a high prevalence of allergy to sweet bell pepper pollen was found among exposed horticulture workers. Allergy to plant-derived food is often the consequence of primary sensitization to common pollen allergens. OBJECTIVE: We therefore investigated the cross-reactivity between sweet bell pepper pollen and pollen from grass, birch or mugwort. METHOD: We selected 10 sera from greenhouse workers who had, besides specific IgE against sweet bell pepper pollen, also IgE to grass, birch or mugwort pollen. Cross-reactivity was tested by the inhibition of IgE binding to solid-phase coupled sweet bell pepper pollen extract. The 10 sera were also analysed for IgE binding to sweet bell pepper pollen by immunoblotting. RESULTS: With these sera, no or small inhibition of IgE binding to sweet bell pepper pollen extract was observed with grass, birch and mugwort pollen. With immunoblotting, major IgE-binding structures were seen at 14, 29 and 69 kDa in sweet bell pepper pollen extract. CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrate that sweet bell pepper pollen contains allergens that have no or limited cross-reactivity with common pollen allergens. With sera from the 10 patients tested, sensitization to sweet bell pepper pollen was not the consequence of primary sensitization to common pollen allergens.     

Two different profiles of peach allergy in the north of Spain

BACKGROUND: Peach allergy has two different patterns: central Europe with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) related to a primary sensitization to birch pollen Bet v 1 and profilins and southern Europe with mostly systemic symptoms, in many cases due to sensitization to lipid-transfer proteins. METHODS: Thirty peach-allergic patients with positive skin and food challenge tests and 29 control subjects were included. Skin prick tests (SPT) with inhalant allergens, commercial peach and apple extracts and native Pru p 3 were performed. In vitro specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E to grass pollen, birch pollen, peach, apple, rBet v 1, rBet v 2 and rPhl p 12 was determined by CAP, and rBet v 1, rMal d 1, rMal d 4, rMal d 3 and rPru p 3 using the ADVIA-Centaur platform. Basophil activation test (BAT) with commercial peach extract, commercial apple extract, nPru p 3, rMal d 3, rMal d 1 and rMal d 4 was also performed. RESULTS: Pru p 3 was the major allergen in the patient group from northern Spain. Sensitization to this allergen was found in 100% of the patients with systemic symptoms or contact urticaria. Only 60% of OAS patients were sensitized to Pru p 3, being all of them sensitized to profilins and 60% of them to allergens of the Bet v 1 family. Specific IgE determination and BAT using recombinant allergens (rPru p 3) show specificity and sensitivity values close to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Most peach-allergic patients coming from the north of Spain present systemic symptoms after ingestion of peach, Pru p 3 being the main allergen. Patients with OAS present profilin-Bet v 1-related sensitization. Thus, in the north of Spain our patients show a mixed central-south Europe pattern with LTP-profilin-Bet v 1 sensitization depending on the symptoms presented. The use of natural and recombinant plant allergens, allows establishing the sensitization patterns to the different allergens studied.     

Plant Food Allergy in Patients with Pollinosis from the Mediterranean Area

Background: Patients with pollinosis develop symptoms after intake of plant food more often than the general population. In order to study the prevalence of the presentation of allergic symptoms to plant foods in pollinosis, we selected a representative sample of the population from our Mediterranean area. Methods: All patients completed a questionnaire, provided a blood sample and underwent a battery of skin and other complementary tests (prick-prick, oral challenge test) when necessary. The pollen counts were obtained from the Elche pollen station. In addition, sera from a subgroup of patients were checked with an allergen molecule panel on an Advia Centaur XP platform. Results: Of the final sample (n = 233), 39.9% of the patients with pollinosis were sensitized and 30.9% had clinical allergy to at least one of the plant foods studied. Regression analysis showed that age and sensitization to the extracts of Platanus acerifolia and Artemisia vulgaris were the most important variables for discriminating between groups. Patients with pollinosis at a risk of allergy to plant foods had significantly higher Pru p 3 values [odds ratio (OR) 3.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.3-4.8], and the value increased according to the number of plant food sensitizations. Conclusion: Plant food allergy is more common in patients with pollinosis than in the general population. The use of the London plain tree (P. acerifolia) and mugwort (A. vulgaris) in the skin tests may help identify such patients in our Mediterranean area, but determination of rPru p 3 could also be very useful in patients suspected of having plant food allergy.     

Purified allergens vs. complete extract in the diagnosis of plane tree pollen allergy

BACKGROUND: Plane tree pollen allergy is a clinical disorder affecting human population in cities of Europe, North America, South Africa, and Australia. OBJECTIVE: To compare IgE-reactivity of the natural and recombinant forms of two major plane allergens, Pla a 1 and Pla a 2, with the reactivity of Platanus acerifolia pollen extract. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with P. acerifolia allergy, 15 of them monosensitized, and 24 control subjects were included in the study. Natural Pla a 1 and Pla a 2 were purified by standard chromatographic methods and recombinant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli. Skin prick test and determination of specific IgE were performed with commercial P. acerifolia extract and natural and recombinant purified allergens. RESULTS: Pla a 1 and Pla a 2 were responsible for 79% of the IgE-binding capacity against P. acerifolia pollen extract. A high correlation has been found between the IgE response to nPla a 1 (R = 0.80; P < 0.001) or nPla a 2 (R = 0.79; P < 0.001) vs. P. acerifolia extract as well as between natural and recombinant Pla a 1 (R = 0.89; P < 0.001). Skin testing showed no significant differences between extract and nPla a 2, whereas a higher reactivity was found with nPla a 1. In contrast, rPla a 1 revealed markedly reduced sensitivity in comparison with extract by skin prick test and specific IgE. The sensitivity of the mix Pla a 1+Pla a 2 was 100% and 87.5% for monosensitized and polysensitized patients, respectively, with no false-positive reactions detected. Conclusion Pla a 1 and Pla 2 are sufficient for a reliable diagnosis of P. acerifolia in most patients and induce comparable skin test reactivity as a whole extract.     

Allergy to Rosaceae fruits without related pollinosis

Background: Rosaceae fruit allergy is frequently associated with birch pollinosis in Central and Northern Europe and with grass pollen allergy in Central Spain. The main cross-reactive structures involved for birch pollinosis are Bet v 1 and profilin, and for grass pollinosis they are profilin and carbohydrate determinants. Rosaceae fruit allergy can occasionally be observed in patients without pollinosis. Objective: We investigated the clinical presentation and the allergens involved in allergy to Rosaceae fruit without pollinosis. Methods: Eleven patients from Central Spain allergic to apples, peaches, and/or pears but not to pollens were compared with 22 control subjects with combined grass pollen and fruit allergy. Skin prick tests and RASTs to apple, peach, and pear were performed. Cross-allergenicity was studied by RAST inhibition. Bet v 1 was tested with an indirect RAST, and profilin was tested in skin prick tests, histamine release, and RAST. Results: Rosaceae fruit allergy without pollinosis is severe with 82% of patients reporting systemic symptoms, mainly anaphylaxis (73%), whereas oral symptoms are less frequent (64%). Anaphylactic shock was observed in 36% of patients. The fruit allergens involved showed cross-reactivity among Rosaceae species but were not related to profilin or Bet v 1. Ninety-one percent of patients with combined grass pollinosis and fruit allergy reported oral allergy, 45% reported systemic symptoms, 18% reported anaphylaxis, and 9% reported anaphylactic shock. Conclusion: Allergy to Rosaceae fruits in patients without a related pollen allergy is a severe clinical entity. Profilin- and Bet v 1-related structures are not involved in Rosaceae fruit allergy without pollinosis.(J Allergy Clin Immunol 97;100;728-33)     

Pollen-food syndromes associated with weed pollinosis: an update from the molecular point of view

Pollinosis patients often display adverse reactions upon the ingestion of plant-derived foods as a result of immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-reactive structures shared by pollen and food allergen sources. The symptoms of such pollen-food syndromes (PFS) or class 2 food allergies range from local oral allergy syndrome to severe systemic anaphylaxis. Two clinical syndromes, the celery-mugwort-spice syndrome and the mugwort-mustard-allergy syndrome have been described in association with weed pollinosis. However, other associations between weed pollinosis and hypersensitivity to certain kinds of food have also been observed, like the mugwort-peach, the ragweed-melon-banana, the plantain-melon, the pellitory-pistachio, the goosefoot-fruit, the Russian thistle-saffron, and the hop-celery association. The number of allergen sources involved, the allergens, and influencing factors including geography, diet, and food preparation contribute to the high clinical complexity of PFS. So far, known causative cross-reactive allergens include profilins, lipid transfer proteins, and high-molecular weight allergens and/or glycoallergens. The current usage of nonstandardized allergen extracts poses additional problems for both diagnosis and therapy of PFS patients. Further identification and characterization of involved allergens is inescapable for better understanding of PFS and vaccine development. Panels of recombinant allergens and/or hypo-allergens are promising tools to improve both PFS diagnostics and therapy.     

Antibody profiles and self-reported symptoms to pollen-related food allergens in grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe

BACKGROUND: Most studies on pollen-related food allergy have so far focused on the association of birch/weed pollen allergens and plant food allergy. The aim of this study was to elucidate the allergen spectrum among a group of grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe and to relate the results to clinical histories of pollen-related food allergy. METHODS: Fifty-eight grass pollen-allergic patients answered a questionnaire regarding allergy to foods. Blood samples were taken to test IgE-reactivity to a large panel of pollen allergens and pollen- and nonpollen-related food allergens using crude allergen extracts and recombinant and native allergens. RESULTS: Three different groups of grass pollen-allergic patients were identified according to their IgE antibody profile: a grass pollen group only (19%), a grass and tree pollen group (29%) and a grass, tree and compositae (pan-) pollen group (48%). No sensitization to Bet v 1 as well as almost no IgE to plant food was observed in the grass pollen group. In contrast, nearly all patients in the two tree-related groups had IgE to Bet v 1, which reflected the high frequency of adverse reactions to typical birch-related food in these groups. Only four patients belonging to the pan-pollen group displayed IgE to profilin Phl p 12/Bet v 2. Patients in the pan-pollen group reported significantly more symptoms to food allergens compared with patients in the two other groups. The most frequently reported symptom was the oral allergy syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization to grass pollen alone is rare among grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe. The majority of patients are in addition sensitized to birch (Bet v 1), which seems to be closely related to their pollen-derived food allergy. The study highlights the advantage of using well-defined allergen molecules for the diagnosis of cross-reactivity between pollen and food allergens.     

The role of major olive pollen allergens Ole e 1, Ole e 9, and Ole e 10 on mice sensitization.

BACKGROUND: Olive pollen is an important cause of allergy in Mediterranean countries. To date, 10 allergens (Ole e 1 to Ole e 10) have been isolated and characterized. Animal models of olive pollen allergy are suitable tools for testing the efficacy and safety of new forms of immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the immune response in mice sensitized with olive pollen extract and to compare it with that of allergic patients. METHODS: BALB/c mice were sensitized by 4 intraperitoneal injections of olive pollen extract in aluminum hydroxide. The allergic state was proved by measuring serum specific IgG1 and total IgE antibody levels. The IgG1 responses to olive pollen allergens were assayed by immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Competition experiments between human IgE and mouse IgG1 binding to olive pollen allergens were performed. RESULTS: Sensitization with olive pollen extract induced high levels of specific IgG1 and total IgE in all tested animals. Immunoblotting experiments showed that the mouse IgG1 binding pattern to pollen extract was complex and heterogeneous, as occurs with human IgE. High IgG1 antibody levels to the major olive pollen allergens described for humans were detected in serum samples from sensitized mice, whereas minor olive pollen allergens induced no significant IgG1 response. Coincubation of mouse serum samples with a cocktail of Ole e 1, Ole e 9, and Ole e 10 resulted in a significant decrease (60%) in IgG1 binding to olive pollen extract. Specific mouse IgG1 strongly inhibited human IgE binding to olive pollen allergens. CONCLUSIONS: This mouse model of olive pollen sensitization mimics immunologic features of human pollinosis and could be a useful tool for designing novel forms of immunotherapy for olive pollen allergy based on allergen cocktails.     

Melon sensitivity shares allergens with Plantago and grass pollens

Possible associations between allergy to pollen and that to food allergens were studied in 262 patients sensitized to pollen. Forty-four patients (16.7%) showed some allergic symptoms after testing with fruits and vegetables, melon being the food most frequently involved (24 patients), followed by sunflower seed (12 patients). Skin testing was done by the prick method with natural fruit or vegetable, and also with commercial food extracts. We found in our region that the distribution of sensitivity to pollens in the group of patients with allergy to fruits or vegetables does not coincide with the prevalence in pollen-allergic subjects in general, since in the first group -subjects allergic to food - there was a major prevalence of allergy to Plantago ( P < 0.01). In particular, in the group of subjects allergic to melon, the prevalence of sensitivity to grass and especially to Plantago was larger than in pollen-allergic subjects in general ( P < 0.05 and P 0.001, respectively). The use of fresh food produced better results than commercial extracts. A positive skin test to fresh melon closely correlated with positive CAP results. CAP inhibition experiments were carried out, and we found that Dactylis and Plantago extracts inhibited the binding of the melon-positive pool to solid-phase melon. The results suggest the existence of common antigenic epitopes in melon and Plantago pollen, and in melon and grass pollen.     

How long does the effect of birch pollen injection SIT on apple allergy last?

Background: Recent studies showed that injection specific immunotherapy (SIT) with birch pollen extract greatly reduces or cures the associated apple allergy in a large proportion of birch pollen-allergic patients. However, the long-term efficacy of SIT for apple allergy has not been assessed. Objective: To evaluate the duration of the effect of injection SIT with birch pollen extract on apple allergy in birch pollen-allergic patients. Methods: Thirty birch pollen-allergic patients showing both the clinical disappearance of apple allergy and a negative SPT with fresh apple at the end of their injection SIT course were followed-up at 12-month intervals from 6 months after SIT was stopped. Apple tolerance as well as SPT was assessed on all occasions. Fifty-seven birch pollen-allergic subjects without apple allergy and not submitted to SIT regularly followed-up for the onset of oral allergy syndrome (OAS) were used as controls. Results: The overall prevalence of OAS after 30 months of follow-up did not differ between patients and controls. Although most patients became re-sensitized to apple by SPT over time, >50% of them were still able to tolerate eating the fruit at the 30-month follow-up visit. Conclusion: Although most patients show a ‘natural’, gradual propensity to apple re-sensitization (a consequence of prolonged and repeated inhalation of birch pollen responsible for primary sensitization?), the clinical effects of injection SIT on food allergy seem rather long lasting.     

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated cross-reactivity between mesquite pollen proteins and lima bean, an edible legume

Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy often develops as a consequence of allergic sensitization to pollen proteins. Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) tree pollen is reported to be cross-reactive with other pollen species, but little has been reported on its cross-reactivity with plant-derived foods belonging to the same/different families. The present study investigates the in vitro cross-reactivity of mesquite pollen and lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), an edible seed belonging to the Leguminosae family. Of 110 patients (asthma, rhinitis or both) tested intradermally, 20 showed marked positive reactions with Prosopis pollen extract. Of these, 12 patients showed elevated specific IgE to Prosopis pollen extract alone and four to both Phaseolus and pollen extract. In vitro cross-reactivity was investigated using inhibition assays [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) inhibition, immunoblot inhibition], histamine release and lymphoproliferation. P. lunatus extract could inhibit IgE binding to P. juliflora in a dose-dependent manner, requiring 400 ng of protein for 50% inhibition in ELISA assay. Immunoblot and immunoblot inhibition demonstrated the presence of 20, 26, 35, 66 and 72 kDa as shared IgE binding components between the two extracts. Histamine release, peripheral blood mononuclear cells proliferation and interleukin (IL)-4 levels also suggested allergenic cross-reactivity. In conclusion, there is humoral and cellular cross-reactivity between Prosopis pollen and Phaseolus seed allergens.     

Profilin is a relevant melon allergen susceptible to pepsin digestion in patients with oral allergy syndrome

BACKGROUND: Melon allergy has been documented by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. The most common clinical feature associated with melon allergy is oral allergy syndrome (OAS). However, no relevant allergens of melon have been identified to date. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify melon allergens and analyze their digestibility in human saliva and simulated gastric fluid (SGF) to provide a rationale for the OAS. METHODS: Melon, zucchini, cucumber, and watermelon allergens were identified by means of IgE immunoblotting of sera from 21 patients with OAS after melon ingestion confirmed by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Further characterization was performed with rabbit antisera against sunflower pollen profilin and anticomplex glycans. Lability of allergens was assayed by incubation of melon extract in human saliva and SGF. RESULTS: Several IgE-binding components between 15 and 60 kd and a main reactive band of 13 kd were detected in melon extract with the pooled sera from patients with melon allergy. As in melon, 13-kd components of zucchini, cucumber, and watermelon extracts were strongly recognized by the IgE antibodies of the patients with melon allergy and were identified as profilins. Putative cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants were also detected. Sera from 71% of patients recognized the melon profilin, and therefore profilin is considered a major allergen. Melon allergens were unaffected by crude human saliva. In contrast, most melon proteins, predominantly the 13-kd component (profilin), were quickly digested in the SGF. CONCLUSION: In patients with OAS, a 13-kd protein identified as a profilin is a major melon allergen highly susceptible to pepsin digestion.     

Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and the ubiquitous protein profilin: mimickers of allergy

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, evidence has been provided for profilins and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) to be capable of inducing cross-reactive IgE antibodies with little clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of sensitization to CCD and profilin in isolated allergies (birch, timothy grass, house dust mite, pets (cat and/or dog), natural rubber latex (NRL) and hymenoptera venom). To study the contribution of anti-CCD and anti-profilin IgE antibodies as a cause of clinically irrelevant IgE for NRL and apple. METHODS: For the first part of the study, 100 patients with inhalant allergy, 17 patients with NRL allergy and 40 patients with venom anaphylaxis were enrolled. Diagnosis was based on a questionnaire and a positive IgE determination and skin test for relevant allergen. Patients were identified as sensitized to CCD if they had a negative prick test and positive IgE for the glycoprotein bromelain. Sensitization to profilin was assessed by IgE for rBet v 2 (recombinant birch profilin). For the second part of the study, sera containing IgE against apple (n=82) or NRL (n=38) were classified as true-negative or false-positive according to the presence or absence of an oral allergy syndrome (OAS) or NRL-induced anaphylaxis. In these patients, sensitization to CCD and profilin was evaluated as described above. RESULTS: No sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin was found in isolated birch pollen or NRL allergy. In contrast, sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was found in 4/17 patients with isolated grass pollinosis, 5/24 patients with combined pollinosis (birch, timothy, mugwort) and 7/33 patients with venom anaphylaxis. Sensitization to profilin was almost restricted to patients with combined pollen allergy (5/24). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE against NRL the prevalence of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin IgE was higher than in NRL-allergic patients (P<0.00001 and P=0.0006, respectively). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE to apple, the frequency of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was higher than in OAS patients (P=0.004). Clinically irrelevant NRL and apple were also found in four and five out of the seven patients sensitized to venom CCD, respectively. In pollinosis, clinically irrelevant NRL and apple IgE antibodies were inhibited by bromelain and recombinant birch profilin, whereas in isolated venom anaphylaxis these antibodies were inhibited by bromelain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients monoallergic to NRL or birch pollen showed no sensitization to bromelain-type CCD or profilin. Sensitization to profilin and/or bromelain-type CCD, caused by pollen (timothy grass, mugwort) or hymenoptera venom allergens, can elicit false-positive IgE antibodies against NRL and apple.     

Assessment of cross-reactivity between Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen and tomato fruit extracts by RAST inhibition and immunoblot inhibition

BACKGROUND: An association between pollinosis and sensitivity to fruits and vegetables has been reported. Although Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollinosis is one of the most widespread diseases in Japan, there have been no reports demonstrating cross-reactivity between Japanese cedar pollen and other plant food. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate cross-reactivity between Japanese cedar pollen and tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum) using RAST inhibition and immunoblot inhibition. METHODS: The RAST and immunoblot inhibition were performed using sera from patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) after ingesting fresh tomatoes. We identified some proteins that took part in cross-reactive IgE by the determination of N-terminal amino acid sequences and a homology search through the SWISS-PROT database. RESULTS: In the RAST inhibition, the bindings of IgE from the sera from four out of five (4/5) subjects to Japanese cedar pollen discs were inhibited by more than 50% by preincubation of the serum with tomato fruit extracts. Likewise, the IgE bindings to tomato fruit discs were inhibited more than 50% by Japanese cedar pollen extracts in 3/5 sera. In immunoblot inhibition, IgE binding activities of some protein bands on both membranes were decreased by heterologous inhibitors. However, the combinations of these protein bands involved in cross-reactivity were different between patients. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated cross-reactivity between Japanese cedar pollen and tomato fruit using RAST inhibition and immunoblot inhibition.     

Allergy to honey: relation to pollen and honey bee allergy

To identify the allergenic components of honey we studied 22 patients with a history of systemic allergic symptoms following honey ingestion. The group of honey-allergic patients was compared with three control groups: 10 subjects sensitized to artemisia, 10 with honey bee venom allergy and 10 without a history of atopy or bee sting reactions. The allergological tests included skin tests and RAST with three different kinds of Swiss honey (dandelion, forest and rape), pollen of compositae species, celery tuber, extract of bee pharyngeal glands, honey bee venom and bee whole body extract. The results show that 3/4 of honey-allergics are sensitive to dandelion honey and 13 of 22 also to compositae pollen. Nine of the honey allergic patients were sensitized to honey bee venom, 3 also to bee pharyngeal glands and to bee whole body extract. Analysis of diagnostic tests and RAST inhibition studies suggest that besides compositae pollen other allergens, most likely of bee origin are important. In honey allergics primary sensitization may be due either to the honey itself, to airborne compositae pollen or even to cross-reacting bee venom components.     

Understanding patient sensitization profiles in complex pollen areas: a molecular epidemiological study

Background: Allergy diagnosis in patients exposed to multiple pollen species is complex and misdiagnosis is often a cause for unsuccessful specific immunotherapy. Objective: We studied the sensitization profile of individual allergens (major, minor and pan‐allergens) in pollen‐sensitized patients in a region with high exposure to olive pollen by investigating the influence of minor allergens on allergic disease and the association between pan‐ and minor allergen sensitizations. Methods: A panel of 13 purified allergens, which included the most relevant allergens in the area, as well as minor olive allergens and pan‐allergens, were screened using a high‐capacity technology (ADVIA‐Centaur^®) in 891 patients. Results: Olive allergy as measured by specific IgE to Ole e 1 was the leading pollinosis in the area. The minor olive allergens Ole e 7 and Ole e 9 were markers of more severe allergic illness. Profilin sensitization was associated mainly with grass allergy, the second most prevalent pollinosis. Salsola kali pollen allergy was the third most common cause of pollinosis in the area. The prevalence of sensitization to the peach allergen Pru p 3, a nonspecific lipid‐transfer protein, was notable. Conclusion: Epidemiological analysis by component‐resolved diagnosis is a new method, which elucidates the interaction between allergen exposure gradient and patient sensitization. High exposure leads to differential sensitization profiles some of which are associated with more severe allergic conditions. Profilin sensitization, related mainly to grass pollinosis, was a marker of more severe grass pollen sensitization.