Randomized phase II evaluation of 6 g/m2 of ifosfamide plus doxorubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) compared with 12 g/m2 of ifosfamide plus doxorubicin and G-CSF in the treatment of poor-prognosis soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The relative value of increasing ifosfamide dose in combination chemotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin with high-dose (HD) ifosfamide or standard-dose (SD) ifosfamide in patients with STS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with STS were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and either SD ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2)/d, days 1 through 4) or HD ifosfamide (3.0 g/m(2), days 1 through 4) every 21 days. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of metastatic disease. End points were overall survival (OS), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 79 patients (52 patients with localized disease and 27 patients with metastases). Both groups were well-balanced with respect to known prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in 1-year DFS comparing SD ifosfamide with HD ifosfamide (55% v 52%; P = .81). For SD ifosfamide, 2- and 3-year OS were 73% and 52% versus 57% and 49% for HD ifosfamide (P = .34). The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 49%, 23%, and 10%, respectively, on the SD ifosfamide arm, compared with 88%, 58%, and 63%, respectively, on the HD ifosfamide arm. There were five early deaths, all on the HD ifosfamide arm. CONCLUSION: When combined with doxorubicin, HD ifosfamide did not improve 1-year DFS and OS. Toxicity was clearly greater with the HD ifosfamide arm, and lack of outcome differences might be explained by toxicities with HD ifosfamide. These results suggest that HD ifosfamide combination regimens should not be used as first-line therapy for patients with STS.     

The anti-tumour activity of ifosfamide on heterotransplanted testicular cancer cell lines remains unaltered by the uroprotector mesna.

Ifosfamide is clinically used in combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with high-grade lymphomas, sarcomas and metastatic germ cell tumours. In order to reduce the oxazophosphorine-related urothelial toxicity, sodium mercaptoethane sulphonate (mesna) is used in different schedules following the administration of ifosfamide. The proposed mechanism of mesna activity is the binding of toxic oxazaphosphorine metabolites such as acrolein in the urine of the patients. Since an influence of mesna on ifosfamide anti-tumour activity is controversial, the current study has used xenografts from two human testicular cancer cell lines heterotransplanted into nude mice to study the anti-tumour activity of ifosfamide in combination with different dosages and schedules of mesna. In both human testicular cancer cell lines, H 12.1 and 2102 EP, ifosfamide demonstrated anti-tumour activity as a single agent. No reduction in ifosfamide activity was observed with the application of mesna at a dose range from 50% to 200% of the ifosfamide dose. Furthermore, the application of mesna before and 3 h after ifosfamide, a schedule used in many clinical protocols because of the short half life of mesna, not only maintained high ifosfamide anti-tumour activity but also seemed to be associated with the lower systemic and urothelial toxicity of ifosfamide therapy compared with ifosfamide given alone. In conclusion, the experimental in vivo system using human heterotransplanted testicular cancer cell lines confirms the significant anti-tumour activity of ifosfamide in malignant germ cell tumours and demonstrates that mesna does not impair ifosfamide anti-tumour activity in this model. These results are most likely transferable to the use of mesna in patients with metastatic testicular cancer.     

Ifosfamide encephalopathy

Encephalopathy is a potentially fatal toxicity of ifosfamide. Clinical manifestations of encephalopathy range from fatigue and confusion to coma and death. Early identification of this toxicity and prompt cessation of ifosfamide are the essential elements in the management of ifosfamide encephalopathy. Accurate prediction of this toxicity is often difficult. Based on the limited available evidence, methylene blue, an electron acceptor, may have a role in the treatment and the prevention of neurotoxicity. This paper reviews the current understanding of ifosfamide encephalopathy.     

Ifosfamide

The alkylating agent ifosfamide, an analog of cyclophosphamide, has demonstrated significant activity in soft tissue sarcoma and testicular carcinoma. Understanding and control of the urinary toxicity of ifosfamide therapy has allowed greater use and inclusion of ifosfamide in combinations in the treatment of malignant diseases. While preliminary results with ifosfamide in a number of diseases are encouraging, final determination of its efficacy awaits further study. A comprehensive review of preclinical data and clinical trials with ifosfamide is presented.     

Interstitial pneumonitis associated with ifosfamide therapy

Ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide have many toxicities in common. Interstitial pneumonitis has not been reported previously as a side effect of ifosfamide therapy. The authors report the case of a 58-year-old woman who was treated with ifosfamide for soft tissue sarcoma. After the fifth cycle of chemotherapy she developed clinical evidence of interstitial pneumonitis, a diagnosis that was later confirmed at autopsy. The authors suggest that ifosfamide therapy was directly related to this patient's fatal case of interstitial pneumonitis.     

Evaluation of dose-intense Ifosfamide, with and without edatrexate, in adults with sarcoma

Purpose. To define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of ifosfamide when given with G-CSF on an every other week schedule, and to define the MTD of edatrexate that can be given every two weeks with an intense schedule of ifosfamide.Patients and Methods. Forty-one patients with metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced sarcoma participated in this 2-step phase I trial.The starting dose of ifosfamide was 10 gm/m(2) given by continuous intravenous infusion over 4 days every 2 weeks.When the MTD was defined, edatrexate, beginning at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) intravenously every 2 weeks was added in subsequent cohorts of patients.Results. Myelosuppression was the most prominent toxicity. Fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were observed in the majority of patients. Ifosfamide 12 gm/m(2) given every 2 weeks approached or exceeded the MTD. Edatrexate 100 mg/m(2) could be given safety as an intravenous bolus with ifosfamide 10 gm/m(2) every 2 weeks. Therapeutic responses were observed in patients with measurable disease.Conclusions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of administering a dose-intense schedule of ifosfamide alone or ifosfamide with edatrexate that might be applied in the adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting.     

Susceptibility of fibromatosis cells in short-term culture to Ifosfamide: a possible experimental treatment in clinically aggressive cases

Purpose. Deep fibromatoses are large, often rapidly growing but benign soft tissue tumours. Although surgery is the mainstay of treatment, in unremitting and aggressive cases the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy may produce objective tumour responses. Fresh tumour samples from four patients with fibromatosis were investigated as part of a study of drug resistance in soft tissue tumours.Methods. Following short-term culture of fibromatosis cells in vitro , chemosensitivity to 4-hydroperoxy-ifosfamide, the active form of ifosfamide and doxorubicin was tested. Following 72-h continuous exposure to each drug, surviving cell fraction was assessed using the lactate dehydrogenase assay.Results. Mean IC(50) values for ifosfamide and doxorubicin were 6.2 and 0.35 micromol/l, respectively. In samples of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) from the same study the mean IC(50) values for ifosfamide and doxorubicin were 14.8 and 1.69 micromol. The difference in mean ifosfamide IC(50) values for fibromatosis and STS samples was statistically significant.Discussion. We are not aware of any other report suggesting the use of ifosfamide in this condition. These observations suggest that, for patients with inoperable or progressive lesions of fibromatosis causing significant morbidity, it may be valuable to include ifosfamide in experimental treatment regimens.     

The effect of route of administration and fractionation of dose on the metabolism of ifosfamide

Summary The measurement of urinary ifosfamide, isophosphoramide mustard, dechloroethyl ifosfamide and carboxyifosfamide using high-performance thin-layer chromatography with photographic densitometry (TLC-PD) is described. This technique was also used to demonstrate the large inter-individual variation in the ifosfamide metabolic profile of patients receiving the drug as single-agent therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. In addition, oral administration was shown to result in higher levels of these metabolites in the urine. Fractionation of the ifosfamide dose over several days resulted in increasing levels of metabolites in the urine, consistent with auto-induction of ifosfamide metabolism.     

Ifosfamide treatment for children with malignant tumor

Seven drugs were administered to nude mice with transplanted TNB9 neuroblastoma. DTIC, cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide were the first-line drugs against TNB9. Chemotherapy including ifosfamide was effective to three of six children with malignant solid tumor resistant to cisplatin and/or cyclophosphamide. Two of the patients who were pretreated with radiotherapy were found to have hemorrhagic cystitis after ifosfamide administration. It therefore seems that chemotherapy with ifosfamide should be withheld after radiotherapy.     

A phase II study of the combination of carboplatin and ifosfamide in previously untreated metastatic small cell lung carcinoma.

This Phase II study evaluated the combination of two active agents in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): carboplatin and ifosfamide. Thirty previously untreated patients (27 men and 3 women) with a median age of 59 years were included in this study. Twelve patients had one metastatic site and 18 had two or more metastatic sites. The median performance status was 80%. The chemotherapy (CT) regimen administered during the course of this study consisted of carboplatin (300 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (4 g/m2) plus mesna every 4 weeks. All 30 patients were evaluable: 1 achieved a complete remission (CR) and 18 achieved a partial remission (PR) (objective response rate, 63%). The median response time was 3 months and the median survival time was 8 months (range, 1 to 25+ months). Bone marrow toxicity was Grade III in three patients and Grade IV in four patients. The carboplatin and ifosfamide combination was well tolerated. No cross-resistance with the doxorubicin and etoposide regimen was established because 4 of 11 patients responded to this combination (+/- cisplatin) after failing to respond to the ifosfamide and carboplatin regimen. The ifosfamide and carboplatin combination may be considered for inclusion in non-cross-resistant alternating CT schedules.     

Assessment of ifosfamide pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and relation to CYP3A4 activity as measured by the erythromycin breath test in patients with sarcoma

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide is a chemotherapeutic agent that requires cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) for bioactivation and metabolism. To the authors' knowledge, the correlation between dose, pharmacokinetics, CYP3A, and toxicity has not been fully evaluated. A randomized Phase II trial was performed on 22 soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)/cycle) and either high-dose ifosfamide (12 g/m(2)/cycle) or standard-dose ifosfamide (6 g/m(2)/cycle). The pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and CYP3A measurements observed are reported. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic parameters for ifosfamide, 2-dichloroethylifosfamide (2-DCE), and 3-dichloroethylifosfamide (3-DCE) were collected after the first ifosfamide infusion in 13 patients. Bayesian designed limited pharmacokinetic data were collected from an additional 41 patients. The erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) was performed on 81 patients as an in vivo phenotypic assessment of CYP3A activity. RESULTS: Fourteen-hour (peak) plasma levels of ifosfamide, 2-DCE, and 3-DCE were found to correlate strongly with the respective area under the curve (AUC) 0-24 values (r=0.97, 0.94, and 0.95; P<.0001). Patients who experienced a grade 3-4 absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet, or creatinine toxicity (using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2]) were found to have statistically significantly higher median 14-hour plasma levels of ifosfamide, 2-DCE, and 3-DCE compared with patients with grade 0-2 toxicity. ERMBT was not found to correlate with pharmacokinetic parameters of ifosfamide and metabolites or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The 14-hour plasma level of ifosfamide, 2-DCE, and 3-DCE is a simple and appropriate substitute for describing the AUC of ifosfamide after 1 day of a 1-hour to 2-hour infusion of drug. Fourteen-hour plasma levels of ifosfamide and metabolites are useful predictors of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and creatinine toxicity. ERMBT was not found to accurately correlate with ifosfamide pharmacokinetics or clinical toxicity.     

Combined therapy of experimental pancreatic cancer with CYP2B1 producing cells: low-dose ifosfamide and local tumor irradiation

Local therapy of pancreatic cancer with microencapsulated CYP2B1-producing cells and ifosfamide showed an effect both on the primary tumor and on distant metastatases. This possibly represents a consequence of the activation of immune response. Other studies have demonstrated that local tumor irradiation leads to the activation of the intratumoral lymphocyte infiltration. The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of the combined therapy with low-dose irradiation, ifosfamide and CYP2B1-producing cells. Syngenic pancreatic cancer was induced in 38 Lewis-rats by subcutaneous inoculation of 1 x 10(6) (DSL6A) tumor cells. Microencapsulated CYP2B1-producing cells were injected peritumorally 10--12 weeks after tumor implantation. Animals were randomized to the following groups: 1) control (NaCl, 1 ml i.p.), 2) ifosfamide (50 mg/kg, i.p., (3x/week), 3) local irradiation with 5 Gy and 4) ifosfamide plus irradiation. The tumor growth was monitored for 3 weeks. The tumor infiltration with CD4+, CD8+, NK-cells, microvessel density and proliferation rates were investigated by immunohistochemistry. Cytokine plasma level for TNF-alpha were measured by ELISA. Seven of 9 animals in the group of combined therapy showed an objective response to the therapy. The therapy with ifosfamide or radiation alone showed 5 and 3 responders, respectively. The mean tumor volume was significantly reduced after combined ifosfamide plus radiation therapy in the first week, whereas monotherapy with ifosfamide or radiation significantly decreased tumor growth earliest after 2 and 3 weeks, respectively. The high plasma level of TNF-alpha in the control group was significantly reduced after combined ifosfamide/irradiation treatment. The lymphocyte infiltration and tumor proliferation were not significantly different between the groups. Microvascular density was significantly increased after ifosfamide and ifosfamide plus irradiation therapy. The combination of ifosfamide/CYP2B1-producing cells and irradiation showed an earlier therapeutical effect on the growth of rat pancreatic cancer than the irradiation or ifosfamide alone. There was no evidence of late activation of lymphocyte infiltration and PCNA-positive tumor cells.     

Phase I study of docetaxel plus ifosfamide in patients with advanced cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of a fixed dose of docetaxel when combined with continuous infusion ifosfamide, with and without G-CSF support, in the treatment of advanced cancer, and to evaluate anti-tumour activity of this combination. Thirty-one patients with advanced malignancies were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, and ifosfamide at increasing dose levels from 1500 mg/m(2)/day to 2750 mg/m(2)/day as a continuous infusion from day 1-3, every 3 weeks. A total of 107 cycles of treatment were administered. Without G-CSF support dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia greater than 5 days duration occurred at dose level 1. With the addition of G-CSF the maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and ifosfamide 2750 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) included ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy, febrile neutropenia and grade three mucositis. Three complete responses and 3 partial responses were seen. This combination of docetaxel and infusional ifosfamide is feasible and effective. The recommended dose for future phase II studies is docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and ifosfamide 2500 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion on days 1-3.     

Ifosfamide and mesna: marginally active in patients with advanced carcinoma of the pancreas

Ifosfamide, an analogue of cyclophosphamide, has therapeutic activity against a wide variety of human malignancies. In a phase II trial in carcinoma of the pancreas, we treated 31 patients who had not received prior chemotherapy with a median ifosfamide dose of 2 g/m2/d (range, 1.5 to 2 g/m2/d) administered intravenously (IV) over one hour for five consecutive days every 3 weeks. 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate (mesna), an acrolein antagonist with known uroendothelial protective properties, was administered IV at a dose of 400 mg/m2 over 15 minutes before the daily dose of ifosfamide and repeated every four hours for two additional doses. Among 30 evaluable patients, one patient achieved a complete remission (26+ months) and another patient had a partial remission (4 months). The median duration of survival of all patients from the start of ifosfamide therapy was only 3 months (range, 1 to 26+ months). Treatments were generally well tolerated. The most common toxic effects included granulocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, malaise, anorexia, and mild hematuria. Mesna offers an adequate protection against uroendothelial injury caused by ifosfamide. Despite the previously reported response rate of greater than 20% at the same or lower doses of ifosfamide in other studies, our data suggest that ifosfamide is only marginally active against cancer of the pancreas and appears to be of minimal value in the treatment of patients with this tumor.     

Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide (MTP) encapsulated in liposomes to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) could improve the probability for event-free survival (EFS) in newly diagnosed patients with osteosarcoma (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred seventy-seven patients with OS without clinically detectable metastatic disease were treated with one of four prospectively randomized treatments. All patients received identical cumulative doses of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and HDMTX and underwent definitive surgical resection of the primary tumor. Patients were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive ifosfamide and/or MTP in a 2 double dagger 2 factorial design. The primary end point for analysis was EFS. RESULTS: Patients treated with the standard arm of therapy had a 3-year EFS of 71%. We could not analyze the results by factorial design because we observed an interaction between the addition of ifosfamide and the addition of MTP. The addition of MTP to standard chemotherapy achieved a 3-year EFS rate of 68%. The addition of ifosfamide to standard chemotherapy achieved a 3-year EFS rate of 61%. The addition of both ifosfamide and MTP resulted in a 3-year EFS rate of 78%. CONCLUSION: The addition of ifosfamide in this dose schedule to standard chemotherapy did not enhance EFS. The addition of MTP to chemotherapy might improve EFS, but additional clinical and laboratory investigation will be necessary to explain the interaction between ifosfamide and MTP.     

Toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and in vitro hemodialysis clearance of ifosfamide and metabolites in an anephric pediatric patient with Wilms' tumor

Purpose: We evaluated the in vitro hemodialysis ratio and subsequent toxicity and pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide in an anephric patient with Wilms' tumor. Methods: An in vitro model was used to determine the extraction ratio of ifosfamide by dialysis. The toxicity and plasma concentrations of ifosfamide, chloroacetaldehyde, and 4-hydroxyifosfamide were then determined over 24?h after a single 1.6?g/m² dose of ifosfamide. Plasma concentrations were also measured before and after ten dialysis sessions during four courses of ifosfamide therapy. Results: The in vitro hemodialysis model showed that ifosfamide was cleared with an extraction ratio of 86.7?±?0.5% and remained constant even at low concentrations of drug. The mean decrease in vivo following hemodialysis for ifosfamide, chloroacetaldehyde, and 4-hydroxyifosfamide were 86.9%, 77.2%, and 36.2%, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters for ifosfamide using model-independent methods were calculated: Vd?=?0.23 l/kg, t_½?=?4.8?h, and Cl_T?=?3.30 l/h per?m². Ifosfamide-associated neurotoxicity was noted within hours of drug administration and improved rapidly following hemodialysis. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that the pharmacokinetics of parent ifosfamide may not be substantially altered in patients with renal failure. Hemodialysis was shown to remove ifosfamide, chloroacetaldehyde, and 4-hydroxyifosfamide from the blood stream. Hemodialysis was also shown to reverse ifosfamide-related neurotoxicity.     

Ifosfamide, Fanconi's syndrome, and rickets.

Three of 218 children treated with ifosfamide plus the uroprotectant mesna, in single- or combination-agent protocols, have developed Fanconi's renal syndrome, all of whom were in a subgroup of 86 children who had also received cisplatin or carboplatin therapy. Patients receiving ifosfamide who have received prior cisplatin (or carboplatin) are at significantly higher risk of developing Fanconi's syndrome than are those who have received no prior nephrotoxic therapy (P = .04). The role of prior nephrotoxic therapy, including cisplatin and its derivatives, and the total dose of ifosfamide should be considered in the assessment of this rare but serious and apparently irreversible side effect.     

A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.

In a study designed to compare response rates of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma to ifosfamide and carboplatin, 152 patients were randomised to receive either sequential therapy with three cycles of ifosfamide followed by three cycles of carboplatin, or to six cycles of single agent carboplatin. Ifosfamide was given every 3 weeks in a dose of 5 gm m-2 as a 24 h infusion with mesna, 1 gm m-2 by i.v. bolus prior to ifosfamide, 3 gm m-2 with ifosfamide, and 1 gm m-2 as an 8 h infusion after ifosfamide. Carboplatin was given in a dose of 400 mg m-2 by short i.v. infusion every 4 weeks. Sixty-eight evaluable patients were randomised to sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin, and 67 to single agent carboplatin. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 5.5-82.3). After three cycles of treatment two patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 12 partial remission (PR) for an overall response rate of 29%, whereas in the carboplatin arm ten patients achieved CR, and 23 PR, for an overall response rate of 63% (P = 0.0008). Seven of 15 patients with progressive disease, and nine of 20 patients with stable disease at the initial response evaluation, following three cycles of ifosfamide, subsequently responded to carboplatin therapy so that the final response rate to the complete regimen was 65% for the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, compared to 71% for the carboplatin arm (NS). For the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, median recurrence free survival and overall survival were 14.1 months and 18.7 months. Corresponding figures for the carboplatin arm were 14.5 months and 21.5 months (NS). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. However 47% of patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm developed alopecia sufficient to require a wig, compared to only 2% in the carboplatin arm. Ifosfamide is clearly less effective, and more toxic than carboplatin. Ifosfamide failures can however be effectively salvaged by subsequent carboplatin treatment. Ifosfamide cannot be recommended for single agent therapy in ovarian carcinoma, however the combination of carboplatin plus ifosfamide might be a suitable treatment to be tested in a future randomised study against carboplatin alone.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics and alkylating activity of fractionated intravenous and oral ifosfamide in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma

20 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were treated with ifosfamide and mesna 1.5 g/m2 daily for 5 days; 10 received the drug by mouth and 10 i.v. Both schedules resulted in a reduction in the elimination half-life with an increased total and nonrenal clearance of ifosfamide over the 5-day period. Oral administration resulted in an unacceptably high incidence of encephalopathy(5/10) which was not seen in the i.v. group. In two patients this encephalopathy manifested itself as coma which lasted for 24 to 48 h but was fully reversible and in the other three cases as somnolence occurring for more than 50% of the patients' waking hours. Nadir blood counts and response rates were similar in both arms. The encephalopathy suggests that there are metabolic differences between the i.v. and oral routes and that a metabolite rather than the parent drug is responsible for this syndrome. In addition it was shown that the total and nonrenal clearance of the drug was significantly less when the drug was administered orally. None of the pharmacokinetic parameters either singly or in combination predicted for ifosfamide toxicity. No correlation between the creatinine clearance and ifosfamide renal clearance was demonstrated suggesting tubular reabsorption of the drug. In conclusion, ifosfamide cannot be given orally at the conventionally employed i.v. doses.