Simulation‐based surgical education in cardiothoracic training

Simulation has emerged as a feasible adjunct to surgical education and training for most specialties. It provides trainees with an immersive, realistic way to learn a variety of skills in a safe environment with the end goal of improving patient safety. There are three broad types of simulators: full mannequin simulators, part‐task trainers or bench models and virtual reality systems. This review aims to describe the current use of simulation in cardiothoracic surgical education and training. We identified multiple procedures that can be simulated in cardiothoracic surgery using a combination of the above simulators, three‐dimensional printing and computer‐based simulation. All studies that assessed the efficacy of simulators showed that simulation enhances learning and trainee performance allowing for repetitive training until the acquisition of competence but further research into how it translates into the operating theatre is required. In Australia, cardiac surgery simulation is not yet part of the training curricula, but simulators are available for certain tasks and procedures.     

Role of simulation in surgical education and training

There are several challenges facing surgical education and training that simulation may help to address. A conceptual framework is required to allow the appropriate application of simulation to a given level and type of surgical skill and this should be driven by educational imperatives and not by technological innovation. Simple simulation is required for core skills training. Cognitive simulation is introduced as a way in which procedural skills training can be achieved. Virtual world simulation opens up significant opportunities for team skills training. A role for simulation in surgical education and training appears assured, but its success will be determined by the extent to which it is integral to high quality curricula, its importance determined by its contribution to both learning and assessment, and its sustainability determined by evidence of its advantages and cost‐effectiveness.     

Increased working hours,simulation technology or competency based progression? What is the solution for surgical training?

Surgical training has changed in recent years. Surgical-skill training is considered suboptimal as early as medical school. Changes to medical team structure and societal demographics have also negatively impacted training. To counteract this, the following options are explored: (i) working hours; (ii) competency-based assessment (CBT); and (iii) surgical simulation. With the current requirement of service provision in the health service and political pressures, increasing working hours is not feasible. All stages of training are saturated with CBT. Increasing its use may be unwise, however adjusting it to further emphasize surgical skill may be beneficial. Whilst simulation is not a new concept in surgery, technological advancements have resulted in increased accessibility of computer based simulators. These have been shown to improve surgical skill so should be considered. Surgical training requires reform and trainees need to be involved from the outset. CBT should increase surgical emphasis and simulation should be assessed for integration into training.     

Workplace‐based assessment: assessing technical skill throughout the continuum of surgical training

The Royal Colleges of Surgeons and Surgical Specialty Associations in the UK have introduced competence‐based syllabi and curricula for surgical training. The syllabi of the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme (ISCP) and Orthopaedic Curriculum and Assessment Programme (OCAP) define the core competencies, that is, the observable and measureable behaviours required of a surgical trainee. The curricula define when, where and how these will be assessed. Procedure‐based assessment (PBA) has been adopted as the principal method of assessing surgical skills. It combines competencies specific to the procedure with generic competencies such as safe handling of instruments. It covers the entire procedure, including preoperative and postoperative planning. A global summary of the level at which the trainee performed the assessed elements of the procedure is also included. The form has been designed to be completed quickly by the assessor (clinical supervisor) and fed‐back to the trainee between operations. PBA forms have been developed for all index procedures in all surgical specialties. The forms are intended to be used as frequently as possible when performing index procedures, as their primary aim is to aid learning. At the end of a training placement the aggregated PBA forms, together with the logbook, enable the Educational Supervisor and/or Programme Director to make a summary judgement about the competence of a trainee to perform index procedures to a given standard.     

The use of haptics in medical applications

Explains the need for haptics (feeling of touch) in medical simulation systems. Describes a variety of laparoscopic training systems and other surgical simulators. Highlights the Reachin Technologies AB Application Programming Interface (API) which is a software tool that significantly speeds up the development of surgical simulators.     

Improving Surgical Training

Improving Surgical Training is a programme piloting an innovative, evidence-based approach to training. It was developed in response to the Shape of Training report which reviewed postgraduate training and recommended changes in medical education to meet the demands of the modern NHS. A series of initiatives have been developed to enhance the experience for surgical trainees not only to encourage a more focussed and supported method, but also to improve their job satisfaction. The initiatives have combined a greater emphasis on time for training provided by trainers with allocated time for training with multidisciplinary teamworking and the use of technology enhanced learning with simulation of both technical and non-technical skills. The pilot started in 2018 with core training in general surgery and has been expanded to include vascular surgery, urology and trauma and orthopaedics over the last 2 years. Initial feedback from both trainees, trainers and schools of surgery have identified different challenges to aid implementation. The programme is being very carefully evaluated by an independent company as well as careful oversight by the General Medical Council which are paramount to its success.     

An Innovative Skin Simulation Model to Augment Competency-based Training in Facial Plastic Surgery

Introduction  Competency-based medical education (CBME) approach in the medical curriculum has been introduced globally with the goal of providing flexibility, accountability, and learner-centeredness among medical learners. Traditional surgical skill training in most places has relied on “see one, do one, teach one model,” while simulation model-based training has been shown to improve competencies in surgical trainees. We wanted to assess the usefulness of a hydrophilic barrier adhesive foam wound dressing as a novel skin simulation model for learning biomechanics and practice of cutaneous flaps among plastic surgical resident trainees at our institute. Materials and Methods  An absorbent, soft polyurethane foam pad located centrally upon a larger polyurethane membrane, coated with a hydrocolloid adhesive, forming an island dressing, was used as a simulation model for this study. It was obtained from the hospital store either after or nearing their expiry dates of clinical use. Plastic surgery residents in different years of training were invited to participate in a simulation workshop, using this novel model, and give their feedback. Results  Seventeen residents in different plastic surgery training levels participated in the workshop and gave their feedback on the skin flap simulation model. The simulation model received extremely high (100%) scores on two parameters, namely, utility for flap and suture practice and high scores (88%–94%) for texture, ability to mark, and improving confidence among trainees. Conclusions  Adhesive bilayer polyurethane foam can be used as a novel cutaneous skin flap simulation model for understanding the biomechanics of skin flaps and cutaneous flap practice.     

Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

? To assess the content validity of an early prototype robotic simulator. Minimally invasive surgery poses challenges for training future surgeons. The Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS) is a novel virtual reality simulator for the da Vinci Surgical System.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? Participants attending the 2010 International Robotic Urology Symposium were invited to experience RoSS. Afterwards, participants completed a survey regarding the appropriateness of the simulator as a teaching tool.

RESULTS

? Forty‐two subjects including surgeons experienced with robotics (n= 31) and novices (n= 11) participated in this study. ? Eighty per cent of the entire cohort had an average of 4 years of experience with robot‐assisted surgery. ? Eleven (26%) novices lacked independent robot‐assisted experience. The expert group comprised 17 (41%) surgeons averaging 881 (160–2200) robot‐assisted cases. Experts rated the ‘clutch control’ virtual simulation task as a good (71%) or excellent (29%) teaching tool. ? Seventy‐eight per cent rated the ‘ball place’ task as good or excellent but 22% rated it as poor. ? Twenty‐seven per cent rated the ‘needle removal’ task as an excellent teaching tool, 60% rated it good and 13% rated it poor. ? Ninety‐one per cent rated the ‘fourth arm tissue removal’ task as good or excellent. ? Ninety‐four per cent responded that RoSS would be useful for training purposes. ? Eighty‐eight per cent felt that RoSS would be an appropriate training and testing format before operating room experience for residents. ? Seventy‐nine per cent indicated that RoSS could be used for privileging or certifying in robotic surgery.

CONCLUSION

? Results based on expert evaluation of RoSS as a teaching modality illustrate that RoSS has appropriate content validity.     

Open Surgical Simulation—A Review

BackgroundSurgical simulation has benefited from a surge in interest over the last decade as a result of the increasing need for a change in the traditional apprentice model of teaching surgery. However, despite the recent interest in surgical simulation as an adjunct to surgical training, most of the literature focuses on laparoscopic, endovascular, and endoscopic surgical simulation with very few studies scrutinizing open surgical simulation and its benefit to surgical trainees. The aim of this review is to summarize the current standard of available open surgical simulators and to review the literature on the benefits of open surgical simulation.Current State of Open Surgical SimulationOpen surgical simulators currently used include live animals, cadavers, bench models, virtual reality, and software-based computer simulators. In the current literature, there are 18 different studies (including 6 randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies) investigating the efficacy of open surgical simulation using live animal, bench, and cadaveric models in many surgical specialties including general, cardiac, trauma, vascular, urologic, and gynecologic surgery. The current open surgical simulation studies show, in general, a significant benefit of open surgical simulation in developing the surgical skills of surgical trainees. However, these studies have their limitations including a low number of participants, variable assessment standards, and a focus on short-term results often with no follow-up assessment.Future of Open Surgical SimulationThe skills needed for open surgical procedures are the essential basis that a surgical trainee needs to grasp before attempting more technical procedures such as laparoscopic procedures. In this current climate of medical practice with reduced hours of surgical exposure for trainees and where the patient’s safety and outcome is key, open surgical simulation is a promising adjunct to modern surgical training, filling the void between surgeons being trained in a technique and a surgeon achieving fluency in that open surgical procedure. Better quality research is needed into the benefits of open surgical simulation, and this would hopefully stimulate further development of simulators with more accurate and objective assessment tools.     

Burns education: The emerging role of simulation for training healthcare professionals

Burns education appears to be under-represented in UK undergraduate curricula. However current postgraduate courses in burns education provide formal training in resuscitation and management. Simulation has proven to be a powerful modality to advance surgical training in both technical and non-technical skills. We present a literature review that summarises the format of current burns education, and provides detailed insight into historic, current and novel advances in burns simulation for both technical and non-technical skills, that can be used to augment surgical training. Addressing the economic and practical limitations of current immersive surgical simulation is important, and this review proposes future directions for integration of innovative simulation strategies into training curricula.     

Is it time to incorporate hands-on simulation into the cardiothoracic surgery curriculum?

The COVID pandemic has had huge implications for training in cardiothoracic surgery. The reduction in training opportunities has led to concerns from trainees globally regarding the impact on their learning and their training progression. Surgical simulation is effective in the development of technical skills in cardiothoracic surgery with numerous examples of low and high-fidelity simulators. Despite this the incorporation of such methods into training curricula worldwide is seldom. Core fundamentals are required to successfully implement surgical simulation into training programmes, which includes; commitment from trainers, regular sessions and structured feedback. Few programmes have demonstrated the successful incorporation of surgical simulation and there is a growing acceptance of its place in the speciality. As we recover from this challenging period it may be the right opportunity to evolve how we train our current and future trainees by incorporating hands-on simulation as a fundamental part of the cardiothoracic curriculum.     

Competency-based training of basic trainees using human cadavers

BACKGROUND: Increasing constraints on operative training in the clinical setting provide impetus for the development of alternative training models. Anatomy dissection courses utilizing human cadavers have been useful in imparting knowledge of human anatomy for surgical trainees. The present study evaluates the impact of competency-based technical skills instruction as an adjunct to cadaveric dissection courses on the procedural skills of basic surgical trainees (BST). METHODS: A single cohort of BST was prospectively evaluated regarding their self-reported confidence and competency in performing saphenous vein cutdowns immediately before and after an anatomy dissection course. RESULTS: Nine BST were evaluated (66% were male). One subject withdrew from the study, leaving eight BST for final analysis. Mean number of years since graduation from medical school was 2.5 years (range: 2-4 years). Seven BST were in their first year of training. All subjects had completed an early management of severe trauma (EMST) course. Total prior experience of saphenous vein cutdowns for all subjects was a single attempt on a sheep cadaver at the EMST course. The percentage of BST expressing little or no confidence in performing cutdowns decreased after the dissection course (50% vs 0, P < 0.05). Mean time taken for completion of cutdown decreased after the dissection course. (5 min 52 s vs 3 min 52 s, P < 0.05). Mean size of incision used to perform cutdown decreased after the course. (4.5 cm vs 3.4 cm, P < 0.05). The percentage of subjects experiencing complications during cutdown decreased after the course (38% vs 0, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomy dissection courses using human cadavers may contribute to improving the confidence and competency of BST in performing saphenous vein cutdowns. Technical training components should be considered as an adjunct to future anatomy dissection courses involving surgical trainees.     

Pediatric surgical training: an historic perspective, a formula for change

Background/purpose

American pediatric surgical education has more than a 65-year history of formalizing the organization and the curriculum of the training process. However, never before have so many simultaneous internal and external forces appeared on the horizon that have the collective potential of influencing the quality of future pediatric surgeons. It is the purpose of this study to identify and detail these opportunities, compare them with the historical past, and propose the beginnings of a strategy to control the destiny. The ultimate goal should be to continue to assure that pediatric surgeons are of the highest attainable quality that will optimize the surgical health of America’s children.

Methods and results

Using a current literature review, 7 specific influencing forces have been identified: a declining applicant pool, the generation-X factor, medical economics, early specialization of training, restricted residency work hours, pediatric surgical manpower, and competency-based surgical education. An effective response to these forces is multifactorial, but a first need might be consideration of a new educational oversight organizational structure for pediatric surgery. Thereafter, specific curricular reform is needed to match the strengths of the candidates as well as the training programs. Finally, as a specialty field we must assert the leadership needed to define optimal educational outcomes.

Conclusions

This report defines the educational history and the contemporary influencing forces, and it proposes a strategy to assure that pediatric surgical education exceeds the needs of America’s children into the future.     

How to develop a simulation programme in urology

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Inanimate trainers and simulators have been shown to facilitate the skill acquisition of urologists. However, there are significant challenges to integrating standalone simulation programmes into mainstream urology curricula. This study provides a framework to overcome these challenges and discusses the advantages of centralised urology simulation centres and their potential to serve as key adjuncts in the certification and validation process of urologists. Fixed performance‐based outcomes of inanimate trainers and simulators have been praised as useful adjuncts in urology for reducing the learning curve associated with the acquisition of new technical and non‐technical skills without compromising patient safety. Simulators are becoming an integral part of the urology training curriculum and their effectiveness is totally dependent on the structure of the programme implemented. The present paper discusses the fundamental concepts of centralized urology centres and their potential to serve as key adjuncts in the certification and validation process of urologists. In summary, proficiency‐based curricula with well structured endpoints and objective tools for validating proficiency are critical in developing a simulation programme in urology. We concludes that more educational research into the outcomes of integrated urology curricula followed by trainee/trainer opinion surveys will help address some of these criteria.     

A Review of the Available Urology Skills Training Curricula and Their Validation

BackgroundThe transforming field of urological surgery continues to demand development of novel training devices and curricula for its trainees. Contemporary trainees have to balance workplace demands while overcoming the cognitive barriers of acquiring skills in rapidly multiplying and advancing surgical techniques. This article provides a brief review of the process involved in developing a surgical curriculum and the current status of real and simulation-based curricula in the 4 subgroups of urological surgical practice: open, laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic.MethodsAn informal literature review was conducted to provide a snapshot into the variety of simulation training tools available for technical and nontechnical urological surgical skills within all subgroups of urological surgery using the following keywords: “urology, surgery, training, curriculum, validation, non-technical skills, technical skills, LESS, robotic, laparoscopy, animal models.” Validated training tools explored in research were tabulated and summarized.Results and ConclusionsA total of 20 studies exploring validated training tools were identified. Huge variation was noticed in the types of validity sought by researchers and suboptimal incorporation of these tools into curricula was noted across the subgroups of urological surgery. The following key recommendations emerge from the review: adoption of simulation-based curricula in training; better integration of dedicated training time in simulated environments within a trainee's working hours; better incentivization for educators and assessors to improvise, research, and deliver teaching using the technologies available; and continued emphasis on developing nontechnical skills in tandem with technical operative skills.     

Towards a hybrid philosophy of surgical education

BACKGROUND: Surgical training involves a complex amalgam of skills. This publication seeks to incorporate concepts about higher education into a philosophy of surgical education. METHODS: The core of the present review is derived from a literature search of a computer database (Medline). The notion of competence is used to illustrate the concept of a philosophy of surgical education. CONCLUSION: A predefined philosophy of surgical education may serve as a useful reference point when choices arise during the development of surgical training.     

Postgraduate surgical education and training in Canada and Australia: each may benefit from the other's experiences

Canada and Australia share similar cultural origins and current multicultural societies and demographics but there are differences in climate and sporting pursuits. Surgeons and surgeon teachers similarly share many of the same challenges, but the health care and health-care education systems differ in significant ways. The objective of this review is to detail the different postgraduate surgical training programs with a focus on general surgery and how the programs of each country may benefit from appreciating the experiences of the other. The major differences relate to entry requirements, the role of universities in governance of training, mandatory skills courses in early training, the accreditation process, remuneration for surgical teachers and the impact of private practice. Many of the differences are culturally entrenched in their respective medical systems and unlikely to change substantially. Direct entry into specialty training without an internship per se is now firmly established in Canada just as delayed entry after internship is mandated by the Australian Medical Board. Both recognize the importance of establishing goals and objectives, modular curricular and the emerging role of online educational resources and how these may impact on assessments. The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons is unlikely to cede much responsibility to the universities but alternative academic models are emerging. Private health care in the two countries differs, but there are increasing opportunities for training in the private sector in Australia. In spite of the differences, both provide excellent health care and surgical training opportunities in an environment with significant fiscal, technological and societal challenges.     

The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review

Background  Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods  A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/Education. Results  The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions  In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.