Safety,immunogenicity and efficacy of a recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

The World Health Organization has stipulated a target: reduce the mortality rate caused by dengue disease by 50% until 2020. Most likely, this goal can be achieved by means of a dengue vaccine. Accordingly, the recombinant and tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV), developed by the Sanofi Pasteur Group, is in an advanced stage of human testing. Although there are multiple randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the CYD-TDV, individual results may have little power to identify differences between the populations studied. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine a more precise estimate of the overall parameters of safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of CYD-TDV. A data search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and SciELO databases with defined selection criteria. We included for meta-analysis seven randomized and placebo-controlled studies that included 6678 patients randomized to receive the CYD-TDV (4586) or placebo (2092). Regarding vaccine safety, it was found that there was no significant difference between treated and placebo groups, as only approximately 5.5% of patients were withdrawn from the study. Regarding immunogenicity, the levels of neutralizing antibodies were measured by weighted mean differences (WMD), which were always higher in the vaccinated group (WMD/DENV1 = 59.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 57–61; WMD/DENV2 = 99, 95% CI 95–102; WMD/DENV3 = 138, 95% CI 133–142; WMD/DENV4 = 123, 95% CI 119–126). The clinical efficacy of the vaccine was 59% (95% CI 15–80; RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.2–0.85, I² = 30.9%). In conclusion, safety and a balanced immune response to the CYD-TDV were found. However, to fully establish the clinical effectiveness and robustness of immunogenicity, it is necessary to perform further studies to assess the long-term effects of the vaccine.     

Immunogenicity of bivalent HPV vaccine among partially vaccinated young adolescent girls in Uganda

Background

Investigations of vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity for adult females receiving fewer than three doses of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine have suggested protection against infection and precancerous lesions. We investigated the immunogenicity of bivalent HPV vaccines among adolescent girls from Uganda who received one, two, or three vaccine doses.

Methods

Young girls vaccinated through a government program in Uganda were invited to participate. HPV16- and HPV18-specific antibodies were measured at ≥24 months after the last vaccine dose using an enzyme linked immunoassay in girls who received one (n = 36), two (n = 145), or three (n = 195) doses.

Results

Nearly all subjects (99%) were HPV16 and HPV18 seropositive at the time of blood-draw. Geometric mean antibody levels (GMTs) were: HPV16_1-dose = 230 EU/mL, HPV16_2-dose = 808 EU/mL, and HPV16_3-dose = 1607 EU/mL; HPV18_1-dose = 87 EU/mL, HPV18_2-dose = 270 EU/mL, and HPV18_3-dose = 296 EU/mL. The GMT ratio for 2:3 doses was 0.50 (HPV16) and 0.68 (HPV18) and did not meet the non-inferiority criteria (i.e., lower bound of 97.5% confidence interval of the GMT ratio greater than 0.50). The GMT ratio for 1:3 doses for HPV16 and HPV18 was inferior, but absolute GMTs for one dose were higher than adult women who received one dose (HPV16 = 124 EU/mL, HPV18 = 69 EU/mL) where efficacy has been demonstrated.

Conclusions

Even though immunogenicity with less than three doses did not meet a priori non-inferiority thresholds, antibody levels measured ≥24 months after last dose were similar to those of adult women who have been followed for more than eight years for efficacy.     

Preclinical development of a dengue tetravalent recombinant subunit vaccine: Immunogenicity and protective efficacy in nonhuman primates

We describe here the preclinical development of a dengue vaccine composed of recombinant subunit carboxy-truncated envelope (E) proteins (DEN-80E) for each of the four dengue serotypes. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy studies in Rhesus monkeys were conducted to evaluate monovalent and tetravalent DEN-80E vaccines formulated with ISCOMATRIX™ adjuvant. Three different doses and two dosing regimens (0, 1, 2 months and 0, 1, 2, and 6 months) were evaluated in these studies. We first evaluated monomeric (DEN4-80E) and dimeric (DEN4-80EZip) versions of DEN4-80E, the latter generated in an attempt to improve immunogenicity. The two antigens, evaluated at 6, 20 and 100 μg/dose formulated with ISCOMATRIX™ adjuvant, were equally immunogenic. A group immunized with 20 μg DEN4-80E and Alhydrogel™ induced much weaker responses. When challenged with wild-type dengue type 4 virus, all animals in the 6 and 20 μg groups and all but one in the DEN4-80EZip 100 μg group were protected from viremia. Two out of three monkeys in the Alhydrogel™ group had breakthrough viremia. A similar study was conducted to evaluate tetravalent formulations at low (3, 3, 3, 6 μg of DEN1-80E, DEN2-80E, DEN3-80E and DEN4-80E respectively), medium (10, 10, 10, 20 μg) and high (50, 50, 50, 100 μg) doses. All doses were comparably immunogenic and induced high titer, balanced neutralizing antibodies against all four DENV. Upon challenge with the four wild-type DENV, all animals in the low and medium dose groups were protected against viremia while two animals in the high-dose group exhibited breakthrough viremia. Our studies also indicated that a 0, 1, 2 and 6 month vaccination schedule is superior to the 0, 1, and 2 month schedule in terms of durability. Overall, the subunit vaccine was demonstrated to induce strong neutralization titers resulting in protection against viremia following challenge even 8-12 months after the last vaccine dose.     

A Phase 1, double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a tetravalent live attenuated dengue vaccine in adults

BackgroundDengue fever is an important public health problem, especially in Asia and South America. A tetravalent live attenuated dengue vaccine was manufactured in India after receipt of vaccine strains from NIAID, NIH, USA.MethodsThis was a Phase 1, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study performed in 60 healthy adults of 18 to 45 years. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive a single subcutaneous injection of either a tetravalent live attenuated dengue vaccine or placebo. Safety was assessed by unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and solicited reactions through 21 days after vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) through the entire study period of 180 days. Dengue viremia was assessed at baseline and on day 9, 11 and 13 post-vaccination using a plaque assay. Immunogenicity was assessed using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) assay using vaccine-matched wild virus serotypes (DENV 1, DENV 2, DENV 3 and DENV 4) at baseline and on 56-, 84- and 180-days post-vaccination. PRNT assay using circulating wild type DENV 1, DENV 2, DENV 3 and DENV 4 were done on day 1 and day 85 for a subset of 31 participants.Results60 participants were randomized to receive dengue vaccine (n = 40) or placebo (n = 20). 23 participants (59 %) showed DENV vaccine viremia post- vaccination for any of the four serotypes with majority on day 9 and day 11. At baseline, all participants were naïve by dengue PRNT₅₀ for all four serotypes in both the study groups except for four in the dengue vaccine group and two in the placebo group. On day 57, the GMTs of neutralizing antibodies ranged from 66.76 (95 % CI 36.63, 121.69) to 293.84 (95 % CI 192.25, 449.11) for all four serotypes in the dengue vaccine group. On day 181 though the titers declined, they still remained much higher than the baseline. The titers in the placebo group did not change after vaccination. Seroconversion through day 85 ranged from 79.5 % for DENV 1 to 100 % for DENV2 while in the placebo group, no participant showed seroconversion through day 85. Similar trends were noted when PRNT was done using wild DENV serotypes in both vaccine and placebo groups.Among solicited reactions, injection site erythema, rash, headache, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia were reported more frequently in the vaccine group than placebo group. All solicited reactions were of grade 1 or grade 2 severity and completely resolved. One unrelated serious adverse event was reported in the vaccine group.ConclusionA single dose of dengue vaccine was safe and well tolerated in adults. The vaccine was highly immunogenic with trivalent or tetravalent seroconversion and seropositivity in most of the participants.The study was funded by Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04035278.     

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a vaxfectin-adjuvanted tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine

A prototype dengue-1 DNA vaccine was shown to be safe and immunogenic in a previous Phase 1 clinical trial. Anti-dengue-1 neutralizing antibody responses were detectable only in the group of volunteers receiving the high dose of nonadjuvanted vaccine and the antibody titers were low. Vaxfectin^®, a lipid-based adjuvant, enhances the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines. We conducted a nonhuman primate study to evaluate the effect of Vaxfectin^® on the immunogenicity of a tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine. Animals were immunized on days 0, 28 and 84, with each immunization consisting of 3 mg of Vaxfectin^®-adjuvanted tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine. The use of Vaxfectin^® resulted in a significant increase in anti-dengue neutralizing antibody responses against dengue-1, -3 and -4. There was little to no effect on T cell responses as measured by interferon gamma ELISPOT assay. Animals immunized with the Vaxfectin^®-formulated tetravalent DNA vaccine showed significant protection against live dengue-2 virus challenge compared to control animals (0.75 mean days of viremia vs 3.3 days). Animals vaccinated with nonadjuvanted DNA had a mean 2.0 days of viremia. These results support further evaluation of the Vaxfectin^®-adjuvanted tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine in a Phase 1 clinical trial.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine administered concomitantly with the measles-rubella vaccine in infants aged 8 months in China: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial

BackgroundTo evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of simultaneous administration of the enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine with the measles and rubella (MR) combined vaccine.MethodsIn this phase 4, randomized, open-label and noninferiority study, a total of 680 infants aged 8 months were enrolled and assigned to the simultaneous administration group (infants received the first dose of EV71 vaccine and MR vaccine on Day 0, and the second dose of EV71 vaccine on Day 28), or the separate administration groups (EV71 group: infants received two doses of EV71 vaccine on Day 0 and Day 28, respectively; MR group: infants received MR vaccine on Day 0). Blood sample was obtained on Day 0 and Day 56 to measure antibody responses to each of the antigens in terms of antibody titer or concentration, respectively. Local and systemic adverse reactions (ARs) and other adverse events (AEs) following each dose were monitored and compared among groups.ResultsAfter vaccination, simultaneous administration group showed similar seroconversion rates of antibody against EV71(97.9%), measles (97.4%), and rubella (94.3%) compared to EV71 group (99.6% for anti-EV71) or MR group (98.4% for anti-measles and 98.9% for anti-rubella, respectively). Noninferiority was demonstrated for all antibodies as the lower limits of two-sided 97.5% confidence intervals (CIs) of the difference in seroconversion rates between simultaneous administration group and separate administration groups were above the predefined margin of ?10%. Additionally, the adverse reaction rates were comparable among groups (54.4% in the simultaneous group versus 43.9% in the MR group versus 52.6% in the EV71 group).ConclusionAntibody responses induced by simultaneous administration of EV71 vaccine with MR vaccine were robust and noninferior to those by single administration alone. Like the previous findings by single administration alone, simultaneous administration demonstrated comparable reactogenicity and safety profiles.     

From research to phase III: preclinical, industrial and clinical development of the Sanofi Pasteur tetravalent dengue vaccine

Dengue vaccine development has reached a major milestone with the initiation, in 2010, of the first phase III clinical trial to investigate the Sanofi Pasteur CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine (TDV). The CYD TDV candidate is composed of four recombinant, live, attenuated vaccines (CYD-1-4) based on a yellow fever vaccine 17D (YFV 17D) backbone, each expressing the pre-membrane and envelope genes of one of the four dengue virus serotypes. The vaccine is genetically and phenotypically stable, non-hepatotropic, less neurovirulent than YFV 17D, and does not infect mosquitoes by the oral route. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies showed that CYD TDV induces controlled stimulation of human dendritic cells, and significant immune responses in monkeys. Scale up and industrialization are being conducted in parallel with preclinical and clinical development to fulfill the needs of phase II/III trials, and to anticipate and facilitate supply and access to vaccine in the countries where the dengue disease burden makes it an urgent public health priority. The vaccine has now been administered to more than 6000 children and adults from dengue endemic and non-endemic areas and no safety concerns have arisen in any of the completed or ongoing trials. A three-dose vaccination regimen induces an immune response against all four serotypes in the large majority of vaccinees. Preexisting flavivirus immunity favors quicker and higher immune responses to CYD TDV, without adversely effecting clinical safety or increasing vaccine viremia. The observed level and nature of the cellular immune responses in humans are consistent with the good safety and immunogenicity profile of the vaccine. Preliminary results of an ongoing, proof-of-concept efficacy and large scale safety study in Thai children are expected by the end of 2012. Here we discuss the different steps and challenges of developing CYD TDV, from research to industrialization, and summarize some of the challenges to the successful introduction of a dengue vaccine into immunization programs.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine following a 4-week or a 12-month interval between two doses

Background

The MMRV combination vaccine, Priorix-Tetra™, is currently licensed in several European countries using a two-dose schedule in infants aged ≥9 months, with a preferred 6-week to 3-month interval between doses. This study was undertaken to generate safety and immunogenicity data for two doses of MMRV vaccine administered according to dose schedules using the shortest permitted interval of 4 weeks versus a longer interval of 12 months, which would allow flexible adaptation to local immunization calendars.

Methods

Healthy children aged 11-13 months were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 2 doses of either: MMRV vaccine with a 4-week interval between doses (MMRV-4W group, N = 188), MMRV vaccine with a 12-month interval between doses (MMRV-12M group, N = 184), or MMR vaccine with a 4-week interval between doses (MMR group, N = 187). Blood samples were taken prior to, and 4-6 weeks after each vaccination.

Results

Post-Dose 2, both MMRV groups exhibited an adequate immunogenic response for all components; however the MMRV-12M group showed significantly greater geometric mean titers for mumps, rubella and varicella. Two varicella breakthrough cases occurred within the 12-month interval between doses in the MMRV-12M group. Local and general reactogenicity results were similar for all groups except for the MMRV-4W group, which had a greater incidence of fever during Days 0-14 post-Dose 1.

Conclusions

Two doses of MMRV vaccine administered in the second year of life elicited adequate immunogenicity and were well-tolerated whether administered with a dose interval of 4 weeks or 12 months.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of a tetravalent dengue vaccine with two different serotype-2 potencies in adults in Singapore: A phase 2, double-blind,randomised, controlled trial

BackgroundEarly formulations of Takeda’s tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) have demonstrated notably higher neutralizing antibody responses against serotype 2 than other serotypes. Here, we assessed the immunogenicity and tolerability in adults living in Singapore of two TAK-003 formulations: an early formulation, referred to as HD-TDV, and a new formulation with 10-fold lower serotype 2 potency, referred to as TDV (NCT02425098).MethodsSubjects aged 21–45 years were stratified by baseline dengue serostatus and randomised 1:1 to receive a single dose of either HD-TDV or TDV. Immunogenicity was evaluated at Days 15, 30, 90, 180, and 365 post-vaccination as geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies and seropositivity rates. Viremia was assessed per vaccine strain. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were assessed by severity and causality.ResultsOf 351 subjects randomised, 176 received HD-TDV and 175 received TDV. Peak GMTs against all serotypes were observed at Day 30, with highest GMTs against DENV-2 in both groups. In subjects seronegative at baseline, the response to DENV-2 was less dominant with TDV (Day 30 GMTs: 813 for TDV, 10,966 for HD-TDV). In these subjects, DENV-4 seropositivity rates and GMTs were higher with TDV (Day 30 GMTs: 58 for TDV, 21 for HD-TDV; seropositivity rates: 76% for TDV, 60% for HD-TDV). Viremia mainly occurred for TDV-2 in both vaccine groups, with a lower incidence in TDV recipients, and mostly resolved by Day 30. Both vaccine formulations showed an acceptable safety profile with similar overall rates of solicited and unsolicited AEs across vaccine groups.ConclusionsThese results suggest a more balanced immune response with the new formulation TDV compared with the early formulation HD-TDV, particularly in subjects who were seronegative prior to vaccination, and support the choice of the new formulation for the phase 3 efficacy assessment.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a new live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine (NBP608) compared to Zostavax® in healthy adults aged 50 years and older

A multi-centre, randomised, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out to assess the immunogenicity and safety of NBP608—a newly developed live-attenuated zoster vaccine in Korea—relative to Zostavax® in healthy adults aged 50 years or older. Immune responses to the vaccine were evaluated by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays using the interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-2 FluoroSpot kit 6 weeks after vaccination. Safety was monitored for 26 weeks based on subjects’ diaries, spontaneous reports from subjects, and history taking by the investigators. A total of 845 subjects participated in the screening, and 823 received the vaccination (413 in the NBP608 group and 411 in the comparator group). The gpELISA-determined geometric mean fold rise from baseline to post NBP608 vaccination was 2.75 [95% confidence interval, CI (2.57, 2.94)]. The gpELISA-determined adjusted geometric mean titers (GMTs) of NBP608 and the comparator were 1346.37 [95% CI (1273.99, 1422.87)] and 1674.94 [95% CI (1585.35, 1769.58)], respectively. The adjusted GMT ratio of NBP608 to the comparator was 0.80 [95% CI (0.75, 0.87)]. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of the geometric mean spot numbers determined by IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT assays at 6 weeks post vaccination (P = 0.7232, 0.3844). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) within 6 weeks post vaccination was 49.82% overall (410/823, 941 cases), 50.73% (209/412, 474 cases) in the NBP608 group, and 48.91% (201/411, 467 cases) in the comparator group. The difference in AE rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.6010). Most AEs were mild, with a rate of 83.12% in the NBP608 group and 75.37% in the comparator group. Thus, NBP608 is non-inferior to Zostavax® in terms of inducing the immune response and can be safely administered to adults aged 50 years or older.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03120364.     

Immunogenicity of the hepatitis A vaccine 20 years after infant immunization

To determine the duration of immunity provided by the Hepatitis A vaccination (HepA), we evaluated a cohort of participants in Alaska 20 years after being immunized as infants. At recruitment, participants received two doses of inactivated HepA vaccine on one of three schedules. We conducted hepatitis A antibody (anti-HAV) testing for participants at the 20-year time-point. Seventy-five of the original 183 participants (41%) were available for follow-up. The overall anti-HAV geometric mean concentration was 29.9 mIU/mL (95% CI 22.4 mIU/mL, 39.7 mIU/mL) and 50 participants (68%) remained seropositive (titer ≥ 20 mIU/mL). Using a fractional polynomial model, the predicted percent seropositive at 25 years was 55.3%, 49.8% at 30 years and 45.7% at 35 years, suggesting that the percent sero-positive could drop below 50% earlier than previously expected. Further research is necessary to understand if protection continues after seropositivity diminishes or if a HepA booster dose may become necessary.     

60岁及以上老年人再接种23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗免疫原性及安全性临床研究

目的评价≥60岁老年人再接种23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗(PPV23)的免疫原性和安全性。方法招募≥60岁有1剂次PPV23免疫史者作为再接种组, 无肺炎球菌疫苗免疫史者作为首次接种组, 两组研究对象接种1剂次PPV23, 于接种前后28～40 d采集血标本, 使用ELISA检测抗特定血清型肺炎链球菌荚膜多糖免疫球蛋白G浓度, 监测研究对象接种后30 d内的安全性。结果免疫前23个血清型抗体几何平均浓度(GMC)再接种组(0.73～13.73 μg/ml)高于首次接种组(0.39～7.53 μg/ml), 再接种组免疫后GMC(1.42～31.65 μg/ml)高于免疫前(0.73～13.73 μg/ml), 首次接种组免疫后GMC(1.62～43.76 μg/ml)高于免疫前(0.39～7.53 μg/ml);再接种组几何平均增长倍数(2.16～3.60)低于首次接种组(3.86～16.13);再接种组抗体平均2倍增长率[53.68%(95%CI:52.30%～55.06%)]低于首次接种组[93.16%(95%CI:92.18%～94.15%)], 差异均有统计学意义(P<0.00...     

Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy subjects aged 3 to 17 years old: A phase III,open label,single-arm study

BackgroundQuadrivalent influenza vaccines are particularly valuable during seasons in which a mismatch occurs between the predicted influenza B lineage for the trivalent influenza vaccine and the circulating strain. This study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine AdimFlu-S manufactured in Taiwan for the 2016–2017 influenza season in healthy children.MethodsA total of 174 healthy children aged 3 to 17 years old were separated into 3 groups (Group A: 3–8 years old, vaccine naïve; Group B: 3–8 years old, vaccine non-naïve; Group C: 9–17 years old, any vaccine status). Sera was collected pre and post vaccination for each participant. A hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay was utilized to calculate geometric mean titer (GMT), seroprotection rate, and seroconversion rate.ResultsAll enrolled participants completed the study. For the four vaccine strains four weeks after the last vaccination, geometric mean titer ratios (GMTRs) were between 2.9 and 20.9, seroconversion rates were between 42.9% and 90.9%, and seroprotection rates were all above 96.4%. This achieved all immunogenicity endpoints and fulfilled the criteria of the European Medical Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported during the follow-up period of 6 months.ConclusionThis quadrivalent influenza vaccine is demonstrated to be well tolerated and displays robust immunogenicity for each influenza strain. This could potentially improve protection against the antigenically distinct B/Yamagata and B/Victoria lineages.     

Immunogenicity and safety profile of a primary dose of bivalent oral polio vaccine given simultaneously with DTwP-Hb-Hib and inactivated poliovirus vaccine at the 4th visit in Indonesian infants

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the immunological protectivity of infants following four doses of bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV; Bio Farma), which were given simultaneously with DTwP-Hb-Hib (Pentabio®), along with one dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at the fourth visit. A total of 143 newborn infants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled and completed the study. Subjects received the first dose of bOPV at birth. On days 60, 90 and 120, bOPV was given simultaneously with Pentabio®. On day 120, one dose of IPV was also administered. Serum samples for serology analysis were collected before the first dose of bOPV (at day 0), before the second dose of bOPV (at day 60) and 30 days after the last dose of bOPV. In addition, the intensity, duration and relationship of each adverse event to the trial vaccines were assessed. Seroprotection rates after the fourth dose of bOPV were 100%, 91.6% and 99.3% for poliovirus P1, P2 and P3, respectively. Seroconversion rates after the fourth dose of bOPV were 100.0%, 93.3% and 100% for poliovirus P1, P2 and P3, respectively. There were no severe adverse events, and systemic reactions were generally mild during the 1–28 day post-vaccination period. Collectively, our findings indicate that bOPV given simultaneously with Pentabio® and one dose of IPV at the 4th visit was immunogenic and well tolerated.     

Lot-to-lot consistency of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy adults in Australia: A randomised study

BackgroundThe recombinant yellow fever-17D-dengue virus, live, attenuated, tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) has undergone extensive clinical trials. Here safety and consistency of immunogenicity of phase III manufacturing lots of CYD-TDV were evaluated and compared with a phase II lot and placebo in a dengue-naïve population.MethodsHealthy 18–60 year-olds were randomly assigned in a 3:3:3:3:1 ratio to receive three subcutaneous doses of either CYD-TDV from any one of three phase III lots or a phase II lot, or placebo, respectively in a 0, 6, 12 month dosing schedule. Neutralising antibody geometric mean titres (PRNT₅₀ GMTs) for each of the four dengue serotypes were compared in sera collected 28 days after the third vaccination—equivalence among lots was demonstrated if the lower and upper limits of the two-sided 95% CIs of the GMT ratio were ≥0.5 and ≤2.0, respectively.Results712 participants received vaccine or placebo and 614 (86%) completed the study; 17 (2.4%) participants withdrew after adverse events. Equivalence of phase III lots was demonstrated for 11 of 12 pairwise comparisons. One of three comparisons for serotype 2 was not statistically equivalent. GMTs for serotype 2 in phase III lots were close to each other (65.9, 44.1 and 58.1, respectively).ConclusionsPhase III lots can be produced in a consistent manner with predictable immune response and acceptable safety profile similar to previously characterised phase II lots. The phase III lots may be considered as not clinically different as statistical equivalence was shown for serotypes 1, 3 and 4 across the phase III lots. For serotype 2, although equivalence was not shown between two lots, the GMTs observed in the phase III lots were consistently higher than those for the phase II lot. As such, in our view, biological equivalence for all serotypes was demonstrated.     

Immunogenicity and safety of zoster vaccine live administered with quadrivalent influenza virus vaccine

ObjectivesRandomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ZOSTAVAX™ (ZV) administered concomitantly with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in adults ≥ 50 years of age (NCT02519855).MethodsOverall, 440 participants were randomized into the Concomitant Group (CG) and 442 into the Sequential Group (SG). The CG received ZV and IIV4 at separate injection sites on Day 1 and matching placebo at Week 4. The SG received placebo and IIV4 (2015–2016 influenza season) at separate injection sites on Day 1 and ZV at Week 4.Immunogenicity endpointsVaricella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody geometric mean titer (GMT) and geometric mean fold-rise (GMFR) from baseline to 4 weeks postvaccination, measured by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and adjusted for age and prevaccination titer. Influenza strain-specific GMT at baseline and 4 weeks postvaccination was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay.Safety endpointsInjection-site and systemic adverse experiences (AEs) within 28 days following any vaccination and serious AEs throughout the study.ResultsThe adjusted VZV antibody GMT ratio (CG/SG) was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.80, 0.95), meeting the prespecified noninferiority criterion. The VZV antibody GMFR in the CG was 1.9 (95%CI: 1.76, 2.05), meeting the acceptability criterion. Influenza antibody GMT ratios for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata and B/Victoria were 1.02 (95%CI: 0.88, 1.18), 1.10 (95%CI: 0.94, 1.29), 1.00 (95%CI: 0.88, 1.14), and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.87, 1.13), respectively. The frequency of vaccine-related injection-site and systemic AEs was comparable between groups. No vaccine-related serious AE was observed.ConclusionThe concomitant administration of ZV and IIV4 to adults ≥ 50 years of age induced VZV-specific and influenza-specific antibody responses that were comparable to those following administration of either vaccine alone, and was generally well tolerated.     

Immunogenicity of a Japanese encephalitis chimeric virus vaccine as a booster dose after primary vaccination with SA14-14-2 vaccine in Thai children

BackgroundJapanese Encephalitis chimeric virus vaccine (JE-CV) and SA14-14-2 vaccine are live-attenuated JE vaccines produced from the same virus strain. Data on interchangeability is limited.ObjectivesTo evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of JE-CV booster after primary vaccination with SA14-14-2 vaccine.MethodsThis study was an open-label clinical trial in Thai children who had received a primary SA14-14-2 vaccination at 12–24 months before enrollment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02602652). JE-CV was administered. A 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT₅₀) against three virus strains; JE-CV, SA-14-14-2 and wild-type JE virus was measured before and 28-days post vaccination. The laboratory was performed at PRNT₅₀ titers ⩾10 (1/dil) were considered seroprotective against JE. Geometric mean titer (GMT) of PRNT₅₀ was calculated. Adverse events were observed for 28 days.ResultsFrom March 2014 to June 2015, 50 children (64% male) were enrolled. Mean age and duration after primary vaccination was 26.9 (SD 4.6) and 12.8 (SD 2.7) months, respectively. The proportion of participants who had PRNT₅₀pre and post-booster vaccination were 92% and 96% against JE-CV virus, 56% and 98% against SA-14-14-2 strain and 70% and 98% against wild-type JE virus, respectively. Solicited injection site reactions including erythema, pain and swelling occurred in 18%, 10% and 4% of subjects, respectively. Four children (8%) had fever (⩾37.7 Celsius). Eight children (16%) had adverse events, which were not related to the vaccine.ConclusionsAJE-CV booster dose is highly immunogenic and safe among children who previously received SA14-14-2 vaccine.     

Quadrivalent HPV vaccine in HIV-1-infected early adolescent girls and boys in Kenya: Month 7 and 12 post vaccine immunogenicity and correlation with immune status

IntroductionIn sub-Saharan Africa, a generation of HIV-1-infected children is approaching the age of sexual debut and becoming at risk for HPV infection and its sequelae. We assessed safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine in HIV-1-infected adolescents.MethodsIn an open-label trial among Kenyan, HIV-1-infected adolescents aged 9–14 years, we administered the qHPV vaccine at 0, 2 and 6 months and measured antibody titers to HPV-16, 18, 6 and 11 at month 7 and 12 post-vaccination. Measures of immunogenic response from HIV-1-negative historical cohorts from Africa and HIV-1 positive adolescent cohorts from the USA were used for comparison.ResultsWe enrolled 100 girls and 80 boys with a median age of 12 years and median baseline CD4 cell count of 684 (IQR 478, 935) cells/µL. One hundred and fifty four (86%) were receiving antiretroviral therapy for a median of 4.5 (IQR 2.3, 6.3) years; 110 (71%) had <400 copies of plasma HIV-1 RNA/mL. Of 189 enrolled children, 179 received all three doses. Two hundred and eighty five (64%) of 445 adverse events were injection site reactions; none were greater than grade 2. Of 6 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), none were considered vaccine related. Seroconversion to HPV-18, 16, 11, 6 at month 7 occurred in 93.3%, 98.3%, 97.2% and 99.6% of vaccine recipients; similar rates have been reported in historical controls. The mean log₁₀ HPV antibody titer measured at month 7 increased with each log₁₀ increase in CD4 by 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1–1.7) for HPV-18; 1.2 (0.9–1.4) for HPV-16; 1.1 (0.8–1.3) for HPV-11; 0.7 (0.5–1.0) for HPV-6 (all p < 0.0001).ConclusionAlmost all Kenyan HIV-1-infected adolescents mounted an immune response comparable to other immunized populations. HPV antibody titers were higher in those with preserved CD4 cell counts. Longer term-follow up will determine sustainability of the immune response.ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00557245.     

中国婴幼儿接种吸附无细胞百白破灭活脊髓灰质炎和b型流感嗜血杆菌(结合)联合疫苗的安全性和免疫原性研究

目的 比较吸附无细胞百白破灭活脊髓灰质炎和b型流感嗜血杆菌(结合)联合疫苗(DTaP-IPV//PRP～T联合疫苗)与吸附无细胞百白破联合疫苗(DTaP)、b型流感嗜血杆菌结合疫苗(Hib结合疫苗)、注射用灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV)的免疫原性和安全性.方法 受试者随机分为三组.试验组(A组和B组)分别于2、3、4月龄...     

Immunogenicity and safety of the 9-valent HPV vaccine in men

ObjectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the immunogenicity and tolerability of a prophylactic 9-valent HPV (types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) VLP (9vHPV) vaccine in young men 16–26 years of age in comparison to young women 16–26 years of age (the population that was used to establish 9vHPV vaccine efficacy). Safety and immunogenicity data from this study will be used to bridge 9vHPV vaccine efficacy findings in 16–26 year old women to 16–26 year old men.MethodsThis study enrolled 1106 heterosexual men (HM) and 1101 women who had not yet received HPV vaccination. In addition, 313 men having sex with men (MSM) were enrolled and were evaluated separately for immunogenicity because previous results showed that antibody responses to quadrivalent HPV (types 6/11/16/18) VLP (qHPV) vaccine were lower in MSM than in HM. All subjects were administered a 3-dose regimen (Day 1, Month 2, Month 6) of 9vHPV vaccine. Serum samples were collected for anti-HPV assays. Safety information was collected for ∼12 months.ResultsThe geometric mean titers (GMTs) for HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 for HM were non-inferior to those of women at Month 7. For all vaccine HPV types, Month 7 GMTs were numerically lower in MSM than in HM. Over 99.5% of subjects were seropositive at Month 7 for each vaccine HPV type. Administration of 9vHPV vaccine to both 16–26 year old men and women was generally well tolerated.ConclusionsThese results support bridging the efficacy findings with 9vHPV vaccine in young women 16–26 years of age to men 16–26 years of age.