A polyvalent influenza A DNA vaccine induces heterologous immunity and protects pigs against pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection

The composition of current influenza protein vaccines has to be reconsidered every season to match the circulating influenza viruses, continuously changing antigenicity. Thus, influenza vaccines inducing a broad cross-reactive immune response would be a great advantage for protection against both seasonal and emerging influenza viruses. We have developed an alternative influenza vaccine based on DNA expressing selected influenza proteins of pandemic and seasonal origin. In the current study, we investigated the protection of a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine approach in pigs. We immunised pigs intradermally with a combination of influenza DNA vaccine components based on the pandemic 1918 H1N1 (M and NP genes), pandemic 2009 H1N1pdm09 (HA and NA genes) and seasonal 2005 H3N2 genes (HA and NA genes) and investigated the protection against infection with virus both homologous and heterologous to the DNA vaccine components.     

Impacts on influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection from cross-protection of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines and A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines: systematic review and meta-analyses

Cross-protection by seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) against pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009 (now known as A[H1N1]pdm09) infection is controversial; and the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines has important health-policy implications. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to assess the impacts of both seasonal TIVs and A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines against A(H1N1)pdm09.We did a systematic literature search to identify observational and/or interventional studies reporting cross-protection of TIV and A(H1N1)pdm09 VE from when the pandemic started (2009) until July 2011. The studies fulfilling inclusion criteria were meta-analysed. For cross-protection and VE, respectively, we stratified by vaccine type, study design and endpoint. Seventeen studies (104,781 subjects) and 10 studies (2,906,860 subjects), respectively, reported cross-protection of seasonal TIV and VE of A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines; six studies (17,229 subjects) reported on both. Thirteen studies (95,903 subjects) of cross-protection, eight studies (859,461 subjects) of VE, and five studies (9,643 subjects) of both were meta-analysed and revealed: (1) cross-protection for confirmed illness was 19% (95% confident interval=13-42%) based on 13 case-control studies with notable heterogeneity. A higher cross-protection of 34% (9-52%) was found in sensitivity analysis (excluding five studies with moderate/high risk of bias). Further exclusion of studies that recruited early in the pandemic (when non-recipients of TIV were more likely to have had non-pandemic influenza infection that may have been cross-protective) dramatically reduced heterogeneity. One RCT reported cross-protection of 38% (19-53%) for confirmed illness. One case-control study reported cross-protection of 50% (40-59%) against hospitalisation. (2) VE of A(H1N1)pdm09 for confirmed illness was 86% (73-93%) based on 11 case-control studies and 79% (22-94%) based on two cohort studies; VE against medically-attended ILI was 32% (8-50%) in one cohort study. TIVs provided moderate cross-protection against both laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 illness (based on eight case-control studies with low risk of bias and one RCT) and also hospitalisation. A finding of increased risk from seasonal vaccine was limited to cases recruited early in the pandemic. A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines were highly effective against confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 illness. Although cross-protection was less than the direct effect of strain-specific vaccination against A(H1N1)pdm09, TIV was generally beneficial before A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine was available.     

Comparison of severely ill patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods in Singapore

Background/objectivesSingapore is a tropical country with influenza seasons occurring bi-annually. We compared the profile of severely ill patients with laboratory confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection in Singapore during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods, and studied their risk factors associated with mortality.Patients/methodsThree periods were defined for this study; pandemic period from 18 June to 29 August 2009, early post-pandemic period from 30 August 2009 to 12 February 2010, and late post-pandemic period from 13 February to 10 August 2010.ResultsA total of 172 severely ill patients were admitted to hospitals from 18 June 2009 to 10 August 2010, of whom 23.8% died. The median age in the late post-pandemic period was significantly older than that in the early post-pandemic period (52 years versus 35 years, P = 0.02). The median age of patients who died was significantly older than those who survived (52 years versus 44 years, P < 0.01). The median length of stay under intensive care in the late post-pandemic period was twice that in the early post-pandemic (6 days versus 3 days, P = 0.045). The proportion who died in the late post-pandemic period was more than 2.5 times that in the early post-pandemic period (29.8% versus 11.1%, P = 0.043).ConclusionsSeverely ill patients were of older age in the late post-pandemic period. Older age was also significantly associated with mortality. It is important to maintain heightened vigilance and continue the surveillance of severely ill patients with influenza post-pandemic, so that patients with suspected infections could be promptly identified for early diagnosis and treatment.     

Association of vaccine handling conditions with effectiveness of live attenuated influenza vaccine against H1N1pdm09 viruses in the United States

PurposeThis analysis examined potential causes of the lack of vaccine effectiveness (VE) of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) against A/H1N1pdm09 viruses in the United States (US) during the 2013–2014 season. Laboratory studies have demonstrated reduced thermal stability of A/California/07/2009, the A/H1N1pdm09 strain utilized in LAIV from 2009 through 2013–2014.MethodsPost hoc analyses of a 2013–2014 test-negative case-control (TNCC) effectiveness study investigated associations between vaccine shipping conditions and LAIV lot effectiveness. Investigational sites provided the LAIV lot numbers administered to each LAIV recipient enrolled in the study, and the vaccine distributor used by the site for commercially purchased vaccine. Additionally, a review was conducted of 2009–2014 pediatric observational TNCC effectiveness studies of LAIV, summarizing effectiveness by type/subtype, season, and geographic location.ResultsFrom the 2013 to 2014 TNCC study, the proportion of LAIV recipients who tested positive for H1N1pdm09 was significantly higher among children who received a lot released between August 1 and September 15, 2013, compared with a lot shipped either earlier or later (21% versus 4%; P < 0.01). A linear relationship was observed between the proportion of subjects testing positive for H1N1pdm09 and outdoor temperatures during truck unloading at distributors’ central locations. The review of LAIV VE studies showed that in the 2010–2011 and 2013–2014 influenza seasons, no significant effectiveness of LAIV against H1N1pdm09 was demonstrated for the trivalent or quadrivalent formulations of LAIV in the US, respectively, in contrast to significant effectiveness against A/H3N2 and B strains during 2010–2014.ConclusionsThis study showed that the lack of VE observed with LAIV in the US against H1N1pdm09 viruses was associated with exposure of some LAIV lots to temperatures above recommended storage conditions during US distribution, and is likely explained by the increased susceptibility of the A/California/7/2009 (H1N1pdm09) LAIV strain to thermal degradation.Clinical trial registry: NCT01997450     

Cross-protective efficacy of bivalent recombinant baculoviral vaccine against heterologous influenza H5N1 challenge

The present study demonstrates the cross-protective efficacy of baculovirus displayed HAs of A/Indonesia/669/06 and A/Anhui/01/05 against heterologous H5N1 challenges in a mouse model. Mice orally or subcutaneously immunized with live bivalent-BacHA vaccine significantly induced higher HA-specific humoral and cellular immune responses when compared with inactivated bivalent-BacHA. In addition, oral administration of live bivalent-BacHA vaccine was able to induce significant level of antigen-specific mucosal IgA levels. Microneutralization assay indicated that live bivalent-BacHA vaccine was able to induce strong cross-clade neutralization titer against distinct H5N1 clades (1, 2.1.3, 2.2.1.1, 2.3.2, 2.3.4, 4, 7 and 9). The production of both interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) by splenocytes from vaccinated mice indicated that mice vaccinated orally or subcutaneously with live bivalent-BacHA stimulated both IFN-γ secreting Th1 cells and IL-4 secreting Th2 cells, whereas mice immunized subcutaneously with inactive adjuvanted bivalent-BacHA stimulated only IL-4 secreting Th2 cells. Cross-protective immunity study also showed that mice immunized either orally or subcutaneously with live bivalent-BacHA were completely protected against 5MLD50 of clade 1 and clade 2.2.1.1 H5N1 viral infections. The protective immune response elicited by bivalent-BacHA vaccine against H5N1 variants demonstrates the possibility of protection against a broad range of H5N1 strains.     

2012-2018年青岛市A型(H1N1)pdm09流感病毒奥司他韦耐药株基因特征

目的 了解2012-2018年青岛市人群A型(H1N1)pdm09流感病毒奥司他韦耐药株基因特征。方法 收集2012年4月-2018年3月间青岛市A(H1N1)pdm09毒株397份,逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)扩增神经氨酸酶(Neuraminidase,NA)和血凝素(Hemagglutinin,HA)基因全长,序列测定后进行耐药位点和氨基酸变异及进化分析。结果 5株发生了H275Y突变,为奥司他韦耐药株;另有4株S247N突变,可能为奥司他韦耐药株。2012-2018年H275Y突变株检出率依次为2.8 %、2.0 %、0.0 %、1.1 %、0.0 %和0.7 %。NA和HA进化树显示,2012-2013年青岛H275Y突变株与美国耐药株A/Tennessee/03/2013更接近,2013-2014年青岛H275Y突变株与国内株和日本札幌耐药株更接近,这两个年度耐药株的毒株起源可能有所不同。突变株在酶活性位点、抗原决定簇、受体结合位点及其他功能位点(如HA位点D222、Q223和NA位点V241I、N369K和N386K)的转变与野生敏感株一致。结论 青岛市A型(H1N1)pdm09流感病毒奥司他韦耐药株明显增加且流行起源不同,但并未取得比野生株更强的流行能力。奥司他韦仍可作为流感预防和治疗的有效手段。     

Unequal access to vaccines in the WHO European Region during the A(H1N1) influenza pandemic in 2009

In a severe pandemic, rapid production and deployment of vaccines will potentially be critical in mitigating the impact on populations and essential services. We compared access to vaccines and timing of delivery relative to identification of A(H1N1)pdm09 and the geographic progression of the pandemic in the WHO European Region in order to identify gaps in provision. Information on vaccine procurement and donations was collected through a web-based survey conducted in all 53 member states of the Region. Among the 51 countries responding to the survey, the majority (84%) implemented vaccination campaigns against A(H1N1)pdm09. However, time of vaccine receipt and number of doses varied substantially across the region, with delayed access in many countries especially in those in the lowest income range. Improving access to influenza vaccines in low resource countries and solving issues of product liability should help reduce inequalities and operational challenges arising during a future public health crisis.     

Parental socioeconomic and psychological determinants of the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccine uptake in children

BackgroundBefore COVID-19, the previous pandemic was caused by influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in 2009. Identification of factors behind parental decisions to have their child vaccinated against pandemic influenza could be helpful in planning of other pandemic vaccination programmes. We investigated the association of parental socioeconomic and psychosocial factors with uptake of the pandemic influenza vaccine in children in 2009–2010.MethodsThis study was conducted within a prospective birth-cohort study (STEPS Study), where children born in 2008–2010 are followed from pregnancy to adulthood. Demographic and socioeconomic factors of parents were collected through questionnaires and vaccination data from electronic registers. Before and after the birth of the child, the mother’s and father’s individual and relational psychosocial well-being, i.e. depressive symptoms, dissatisfaction with the relationship, experienced social and emotional loneliness, and maternal anxiety during pregnancy, were measured by validated questionnaires (BDI-II, RDAS, PRAQ, and UCLA).ResultsOf 1020 children aged 6–20 months at the beginning of pandemic influenza vaccinations, 820 (80%) received and 200 (20%) did not receive the vaccine against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. All measures of parents’ psychosocial well-being were similar between vaccinated and non-vaccinated children. Children of younger mothers had a higher risk of not receiving the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine than children of older mothers (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.52–4.43, for mothers < 27.7 years compared to ≥ 33.6 years of age). Children of mothers with lower educational level had an increased risk of not receiving the vaccine (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.00–2.14).ConclusionsMother’s younger age and lower education level were associated with an increased risk for the child not to receive the 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine, but individual or relational psychosocial well-being of parents was not associated with children’s vaccination. Our findings suggest that young and poorly educated mothers should receive targeted support in order to promote children’s vaccinations during a pandemic.     

A universal epitope-based influenza vaccine and its efficacy against H5N1

Previous studies have shown that a recombinant vaccine expressing four highly conserved influenza virus epitopes has a potential for a broad spectrum, cross-reactive vaccine; it induced protection against H1, H2 and H3 influenza strains. Here, we report on the evaluation of an epitope-based vaccine in which six conserved epitopes, common to many influenza virus strains are expressed within a recombinant flagellin that serves as both a carrier and adjuvant. In an HLA-A2.1 transgenic mice model, this vaccine induced both humoral and cellular responses and conferred some protection against lethal challenge with the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza strain. Hence, it is expected to protect against future strains as well. The data presented, demonstrate the feasibility of using an array of peptides for vaccination, which might pave the way to an advantageous universal influenza virus vaccine that does not require frequent updates and/or annual immunizations.     

No association between 2008-09 influenza vaccine and influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection, Manitoba, Canada, 2009

We conducted a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada, to investigate whether use of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) during the 2008-09 influenza season was associated with subsequent infection with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus during the first wave of the 2009 pandemic. Data were obtained from a provincewide population-based immunization registry and laboratory-based influenza surveillance system. The test-negative case-control study included 831 case-patients with confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection and 2,479 controls, participants with test results negative for influenza A and B viruses. For the association of TIV receipt with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection, the fully adjusted odds ratio was 1.0 (95% CI 0.7-1.4). Among case-patients, receipt of 2008-09 TIV was associated with a statistically nonsignificant 49% reduction in risk for hospitalization. In agreement with study findings outside Canada, our study in Manitoba indicates that the 2008-09 TIV neither increased nor decreased the risk for infection with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.     

Short and long-term effects of pandemic unadjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine on clinical manifestations and autoantibody profile in primary Sjögren's syndrome

Despite WHO recommendations about the A/California/7/2009/H1N1-like virus vaccination, studies evaluating its possible influence on clinical manifestations and autoantibody profile in primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible influence of the unadjuvanted A/California/7/2009/H1N1-like virus vaccination on clinical manifestations and autoantibody profile in SS in the short/long-term. Thirty-six SS patients (The American-European Consensus Group Criteria, 2002) and 36 healthy controls with comparable mean age and gender were evaluated before and 21-days after this vaccination regarding seroprotection/seroconversion, factor increase in geometric mean titer (FI-GMT) and side effects. New onset of disease flares and autoantibody profile [antinuclear antibodies, anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro(SSA)/La(SSB), anti-RNP/anti-Sm, rheumatoid factor, anti-alpha-fodrin, anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I] were assessed before, 21-days and 1-year after vaccination. Patients and controls had similar rates of seroconversion (77.8 vs. 69.4%, p = 0.42), seroprotection (83.3 vs. 72.2%, p = 0.26) and FI-GMT (p = 0.85). Disease duration, prednisone (2.1 ± 4.9 mg/day), methotrexate and azathioprine did not affect seroconversion (p > 0.05). Regarding short-term, no change in the frequency or levels of autoantibodies was observed (p > 0.05) and only mild side effects were reported in comparable rates to controls (p > 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, the frequency of new disease flares was similar to the previous year (11 vs. 19%, p = 0.51), and four patients developed positivity to one of the following specificities: anti-Ro(SSA)/anti-La/(SSB), anti-alpha-fodrin, or IgM anticardiolipin. None developed specific lupus autoantibodies. Of note, a significant increase in the mean levels of anti-Ro/SSA (p = 0.0001) and anti-La/SSB (p = 0.002) was detected after 1-year with no change in the other autoantibodies. This is the first study indicating that influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine induces long-term changes in autoantibody profile restricted to SS spectrum without a deleterious effect in disease course.     

A cell culture-derived whole-virus H5N1 vaccine induces long-lasting cross-clade protective immunity in mice which is augmented by a homologous or heterologous booster vaccination

Background

Preparation for an H5N1 influenza pandemic in humans could include priming the population in the pre-pandemic period with a vaccine produced from an existing H5N1 vaccine strain, with the possibility of boosting with a pandemic virus vaccine when it becomes available. We investigated the longevity of the immune response after one or two priming immunizations with a whole-virus H5N1 vaccine and the extent to which this can be boosted by later immunization with either a homologous or heterologous vaccine.

Methods

Mice received one or two priming immunizations with a Vero cell culture-derived, whole-virus clade 1 H5N1 vaccine formulated to contain either 750 ng or 30 ng hemagglutinin. Six months after the first priming immunization, mice received either a booster immunization with the same clade 1 vaccine or a heterologous clade 2.1 vaccine, or buffer. Humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated before and at regular intervals after immunizations. Three weeks after booster immunization, mice were challenged with a lethal dose of wild-type H5N1 virus from clades 1, 2.1 or 2.2 and survival was monitored for 14 days.

Results

One or two priming immunizations with the 750 ng or 30 ng HA formulations, respectively, induced H5N1-neutralizing antibody titers which were maintained for ≥6 months and provided long-term cross-clade protection against wild-type virus challenge. Both humoral and cellular immune responses were substantially increased by a booster immunization after 6 months. The broadest protective immunity was provided by an immunization regimen consisting of one or two priming immunizations with a clade 1 vaccine and a boosting immunization with a clade 2.1 vaccine.

Conclusions

These data support the concept that pre-pandemic vaccination can provide robust and long-lasting H5N1 immunity which could be effectively boosted by immunization either with another pre-pandemic vaccine or with the pandemic strain vaccine.     

Lessons from pandemic influenza A(H1N1): the research-based vaccine industry's perspective

As A(H1N1) influenza enters the post-pandemic phase, health authorities around the world are reviewing the response to the pandemic. To ensure this process enhances future preparations, it is essential that perspectives are included from all relevant stakeholders, including vaccine manufacturers. This paper outlines the contribution of R&D-based influenza vaccine producers to the pandemic response, and explores lessons that can be learned to improve future preparedness.The emergence of 2009 A(H1N1) influenza led to unprecedented collaboration between global health authorities, scientists and manufacturers, resulting in the most comprehensive pandemic response ever undertaken, with a number of vaccines approved for use three months after the pandemic declaration. This response was only possible because of the extensive preparations undertaken during the last decade.During this period, manufacturers greatly increased influenza vaccine production capacity, and estimates suggest a further doubling of capacity by 2014. Producers also introduced cell-culture technology, while adjuvant and whole virion technologies significantly reduced pandemic vaccine antigen content. This substantially increased pandemic vaccine production capacity, which in July 2009 WHO estimated reached 4.9 billion doses per annum. Manufacturers also worked with health authorities to establish risk management plans for robust vaccine surveillance during the pandemic. Individual producers pledged significant donations of vaccine doses and tiered-pricing approaches for developing country supply.Based on the pandemic experience, a number of improvements would strengthen future preparedness. Technical improvements to rapidly select optimal vaccine viruses, and processes to speed up vaccine standardization, could accelerate and extend vaccine availability. Establishing vaccine supply agreements beforehand would avoid the need for complex discussions during a period of intense time pressure.Enhancing international regulatory co-operation and mutual recognition of approvals could accelerate vaccine supply, while maintaining safety standards. Strengthening communications with the public and healthcare workers using new approaches and new channels could help improve vaccine uptake. Finally, increasing seasonal vaccine coverage will be particularly important to extend and sustain pandemic vaccine production capacity.     

An M2 cytoplasmic tail mutant as a live attenuated influenza vaccine against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus

The 2009 influenza pandemic brought home the importance of vaccines in infection control. Previously, we demonstrated an M2 cytoplasmic tail mutant H5N1 influenza virus could serve as a live-attenuated vaccine. Here, we adapted that strategy, generating a mutant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus that grew well in cell culture, but replicated less well in mice than did wild-type virus. The mutant virus elicited sterile immunity in mice, completely protecting them from challenge with a pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Our results indicate that M2 cytoplasmic tail mutants are suitable for live-attenuated vaccines against pandemic viruses.     

Prior infection with an H1N1 swine influenza virus partially protects pigs against a low pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus

Most humans lack virus neutralizing (VN) and haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies to H5N1 avian influenza viruses (AIVs), but cross-reactive neuraminidase inhibition (NI) antibodies and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses are common. These immune responses result largely from infections with seasonal human H1N1 influenza viruses, but the protective effect of H1N1 infection-immunity against H5N1 infection has never been examined. To this purpose, we have used the pig model of influenza and a low pathogenic (LP) H5N1 AIV. Pigs were inoculated intranasally with sw/Belgium/1/98 (H1N1) 4 weeks before challenge with duck/Minnesota/1525/81 (H5N1). While the viruses failed to cross-react in HI and VN tests, the H1N1 infection induced high levels of H5N1 cross-reactive NI antibodies. Cross-reactive CMI was demonstrated by measurements of lymphoproliferation and IFN-γ secretion after in vitro restimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. All control pigs showed clinical signs and H5N1 virus isolation from the respiratory tract post-challenge. The H1N1-immune pigs, in contrast, showed a complete clinical protection and only 3 pigs out of 10 were H5N1 virus-positive. In a second and smaller experiment, H1N1 virus infection also conferred cross-protection against a LP H5N2 AIV, while cross-reactive immunity was solely detected in tests for CMI. Our data further support the notion that immunity induced by seasonal human H1N1 influenza virus infection may provide some protection against H5N1 or other H5 AIVs in the absence of neutralizing H5 antibodies. Further studies should reveal whether cross-protection holds against H5N1 viruses that are better adapted to replicate in mammals or with a more distantly related N1.     

Evaluation of replication, immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a live attenuated cold-adapted pandemic H1N1 influenza virus vaccine in non-human primates

We studied the replication of influenza A/California/07/09 (H1N1) wild type (CA09wt) virus in two non-human primate species and used one of these models to evaluate the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a live attenuated cold-adapted vaccine, which contains the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase from the H1N1 wild type (wt) virus and six internal protein gene segments of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 cold-adapted (ca) master donor virus. We infected African green monkeys (AGMs) and rhesus macaques with 2×10(6) TCID(50) of CA09wt and CA09ca influenza viruses. The virus CA09wt replicated in the upper respiratory tract of all animals but the titers in upper respiratory tract tissues of rhesus macaques were significant higher than in AGMs (mean peak titers 10(4.5) TCID(50)/g and 10(2.0) TCID(50)/g on days 4 and 2 post-infection, respectively; p<0.01). Virus replication was observed in the lungs of all rhesus macaques (10(2.0)-10(5.4) TCID(50)/g) whereas only 2 out of 4 AGMs had virus recovered from the lungs (10(2.5)-10(3.5) TCID(50)/g). The CA09ca vaccine virus was attenuated and highly restricted in replication in both AGMs and rhesus macaques. We evaluated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the CA09ca vaccine in rhesus macaques because CA09wt virus replicated more efficiently in this species. One or two doses of vaccine were administered intranasally and intratracheally to rhesus macaques. For the two-dose group, the vaccine was administered 4-weeks apart. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibodies in the serum and specific IgA antibodies to CA09wt virus in the nasal wash. One or two doses of the vaccine elicited a significant rise in HAI titers (range 40-320). Two doses of CA09ca elicited higher pH1N1-specific IgA titers than in the mock-immunized group (p<0.01). Vaccine efficacy was assessed by comparing titers of CA09wt challenge virus in the respiratory tract of mock-immunized and CA09ca vaccinated monkeys. Significantly lower virus titers were observed in the lungs of vaccinated animals than mock-immunized animals (p≤0.01). Our results demonstrate that AGMs and rhesus macaques support the replication of pandemic H1N1 influenza virus to different degrees and a cold-adapted pH1N1 vaccine elicits protective immunity against pH1N1 virus infection in rhesus macaques.     

2018-2019年宁夏甲型H1N1流感病毒血凝素基因组序列分析

目的了解宁夏2018-2019流感监测年度流感病毒病原学检测情况,分析甲型H1N1流感病毒血凝素(HA)基因特征。方法采用real time RT-PCR方法对流感监测哨点医院采集的流感样病例(ILI)标本进行核酸检测;对阳性标本进行毒株分离;提取甲型H1N1毒株的RNA,采用RT-PCR方法扩增HA片段并测序,利用生物信息软件对测序结果进行比对分析。结果宁夏流感网络实验室检测咽拭子标本共5 214份,核酸检测阳性数为760份,其中甲型H1N1阳性数为485份,占总阳性数的63.82%,分离出甲型H1N1毒株161株。宁夏分离毒株与疫苗株A/Califaoria/07/2009不在同一进化分支,同源性为92.6%～96.3%;与疫苗株A/Michigan/45/2015(H1N1)为同一进化分支,同源性为96.6%～98.1%。与疫苗株A/Califaoria/07/2009比较,抗原位点、受体结合位点及其他位点均有变异,除毒株A/Ningxia_Xixia/SWL1176/2019(H1N1)第222位氨基酸发生D222G变异外,其他甲型H1N1流感毒株均未发生D...     

Key points in evaluating immunogenicity of pandemic influenza vaccines: A lesson from immunogenicity studies of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine

IntroductionImmunogenicity studies on pandemic influenza vaccine are necessary to inform rapid development and implementation of a vaccine during a pandemic. Thus, strategies for immunogenicity assessment are required.ObjectiveTo identify essential factors to consider when evaluating the immunogenicity of pandemic influenza vaccines using the experience in Japan with the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine.MethodsWe conducted a search of observational studies using PubMed and IchushiWeb. Search terms included “influenza vaccine AND (immunogenicity OR immune response) AND Japan AND (2009 OR pdm09) NOT review,” and was limited to studies conducted in humans.ResultsA total of 33 articles were identified, of which 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Immunogenicity of the commercially available influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine satisfied the international criteria for influenza vaccine immunogenicity in all study populations. The most remarkable immune response was observed in junior high school students, while the lowest immune response was observed in hematological malignancy patients. Similar to immunogenicity studies on seasonal influenza vaccines, factors such as patient background (e.g., age, underlying condition, pre-vaccination titer, body mass index, etc.) and study procedure (e.g., concurrent measurement of pre- and post-vaccination antibody titer, effects of infection during the study period) may have affected the assessment of immunogenicity to the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine. In addition, prior vaccination with the seasonal influenza vaccine may inhibit antibody induction by the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine.ConclusionsThis review discusses factors and strategies that must be considered and addressed during immunogenicity assessments of pandemic influenza vaccines, which may provide useful information for future influenza pandemics.     

Lessons learned from influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic response in Thailand

In 2009, Thailand experienced rapid spread of the pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. The national response came under intense public scrutiny as the number of confirmed cases and associated deaths increased. Thus, during July-December 2009, the Ministry of Public Health and the World Health Organization jointly reviewed the response efforts. The review found that the actions taken were largely appropriate and proportionate to need. However, areas needing improvement were surveillance, laboratory capacity, hospital infection control and surge capacity, coordination and monitoring of guidelines for clinical management and nonpharmaceutical interventions, risk communications, and addressing vulnerabilities of non-Thai displaced and migrant populations. The experience in Thailand may be applicable to other countries and settings, and the lessons learned may help strengthen responses to other pandemics or comparable prolonged public health emergencies.