Utility of activated partial thromboplastin time waveform analysis for identification of sepsis and overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE: An abnormality of the optical transmission waveform obtained during measurement of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) has been described in association with overt disseminated intravascular coagulation. This abnormality, a biphasic waveform, is caused by the in vitro formation of Ca2+-induced complexes between very low density lipoprotein and C-reactive protein. We have evaluated the diagnostic utility of aPTT waveform analysis for identifying patients with overt disseminated intravascular coagulation and sepsis. DESIGN: Observational study investigating the predictive value of biphasic waveform for the diagnosis of sepsis and overt disseminated intravascular coagulation. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. SUBJECTS: We studied 331 consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit during a period of 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Laboratory analyses, including prothrombin time, aPTT, aPTT waveform analysis, fibrinogen, D-dimer antigen, and platelet count. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the most sensitive threshold value of the waveform variable for detection of the biphasic waveform (slope_1 = -0.05 %T/sec), this abnormality was detected in 54 of 331 patients (16.3%) at admission and 95 of 331 patients (28.7%) during the entire course of intensive care unit treatment. At this threshold, 59.3% of patients with a biphasic waveform on admission and 45.3% with a biphasic waveform during the total intensive care unit course were diagnosed with sepsis. Depending on the threshold value of slope_1, the sensitivity of aPTT waveform analysis for detection of sepsis varied between 22% and 55% at admission and between 48% and 74% during the entire intensive care unit stay. The specificity for sepsis varied between 92% and 98% and between 81% and 94%, for admission and total intensive care unit course, respectively. Biphasic waveform showed a comparable specificity for the diagnosis of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation, albeit at a lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: As an adjunct to routine coagulation testing in intensive care unit patients, aPTT waveform analysis is an elegant means for the rapid and highly specific identification of patients with sepsis.     

New disseminated intravascular coagulation score: A useful tool to predict mortality in comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of a coagulation score-the new scoring system for diagnosing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)-with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Logistic Organ Dysfunction score in mortality prediction. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of the University of Munich. PATIENTS: A total of 797 patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 1, 1996, and January 1, 2001. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients was done if the coagulation variables d-dimer, platelet count, fibrinogen, and prothrombin index were available within the first 12 hrs after admission. Patients with missing values, fibrinolytic therapy, or unknown survival status were excluded from analysis. As a marker of fibrin generation, d-dimer was measured and integrated into the scoring system for DIC together with prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and platelet count. A coagulation score was calculated in analogy with the scoring system for DIC in patients not typically developing DIC. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Overall, the mean result of the scoring system for DIC was 2.2 points. An increasing scoring system for DIC was associated with increasing mortality in patients with serious infections. Use of the scoring system for DIC in addition to the APACHE II score helps to predict mortality better than the APACHE II score alone, especially in patients with infections. The Cox regression analysis showed that the DIC and APACHE II scores correlated independently with survival time with a greater effect of the DIC score than the APACHE II or the Logistic Organ Dysfunction score. Similar results were obtained using the coagulation score in patients with cardiocirculatory diseases. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective data suggest that a combination of the APACHE II score and the scoring system for DIC predicts mortality in critically ill patients with available variables better than the APACHE II score alone. This effect is most pronounced among patients with active infection. These results of our retrospective analysis have to be confirmed in a prospective study.     

A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria

OBJECTIVES: To validate scoring algorithm criteria established by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and to evaluate its diagnostic property by comparing the two leading scoring systems for DIC, from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study during a 3-month period. SETTING: General critical care center in a tertiary care hospital. Patients: Two hundred seventy-three patients with platelet counts<150x109/L were enrolled. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The JAAM, JMHW, and ISTH DIC scoring algorithms were prospectively applied within 12 hrs of patients meeting the inclusion criteria (day 0) to days 1-3, by global coagulation tests. The numbers of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were determined simultaneously. Mortality associated with any cause was also assessed 28 days after the enrollment. All global coagulation tests and SIRS criteria adopted in the JAAM criteria and their cutoff points were validated with use of SOFA scores and mortality rate. DIC diagnostic rate of the JAAM DIC scoring system was significantly higher than that of the other two criteria (p<.001). The JAAM DIC algorithm was the most sensitive for early diagnosis of DIC (p<.001). Patients who fulfilled the JAAM DIC criteria included almost all those whose DIC was diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH scoring systems. The JAAM DIC scores showed significant correlation with SOFA scores ([rho]=0.499; p<.001). SOFA score and mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increase in the JAAM DIC score. Fibrinogen criteria had little effect in predicting outcome for the DIC patients, and a total score of 4 points in the JAAM scoring system without fibrinogen was closely related to poor prognosis. According to the results, we revised the JAAM criteria by excluding fibrinogen and confirmed that the DIC diagnostic properties of original criteria remained unchanged in the revised JAAM criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The JAAM scoring system has an acceptable property for the diagnosis of DIC. The scoring system identified most of the patients diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH criteria. Revised JAAM DIC criteria preserved all properties of the original criteria for DIC diagnosis. The revised scoring system can be useful for selecting DIC patients for early treatment in a critical care setting.     

Another step in improving the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation in sepsis

The diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) based on composite scoring systems using routinely available coagulation tests has been greatly facilitated. Such scoring instruments not only adequately assess the presence of DIC but also have strong prognostic power for morbidity and mortality. In this issue of Critical Care, Gando and colleagues report on the prospective validation of the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine score for DIC in patients with severe sepsis.     

Modified score for disseminated intravascular coagulation in the critically ill

Objective To assess the value of the diagnosis of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and that of the parameters included in the ISTH score for overt DIC in predicting day 28 mortality in intensive care patients. Also, to assess the value of the components of the score in the diagnosis of overt DIC.Design and setting Retrospective clinical study in a university hospital intensive care unit.Patients and participants 494 consecutive patients admitted in the ICU between January 2002 and October 2003.Measurements and results Clinical and laboratory data, including hemostatic parameters, were collected from computerized databases and patient files. Altogether 19% (95/494) of the patients fulfilled the criteria for overt DIC. Their day 28 mortality rate was higher than that of patients without overt DIC (40% vs. 16%). The lowest platelet count (area under curve, AUC, 0.910), highest plasma D-dimer (AUC 0.846), lowest antithrombin (AUC 0.823), and Owren-type prothrombin time activity (AUC 0.797) discriminated well the patients with and without overt DIC, whereas plasma fibrinogen (AUC 0.690) had poor discriminative power. No patient with the diagnosis of overt DIC had decreased plasma fibrinogen. Day-1 SOFA and APACHE II score, the first CRP measurement, and the lowest antithrombin were independent predictors of day 28 mortality.Conclusions The diagnosis of overt DIC was not an independent predictor of day 28 mortality. In ICU patients plasma antithrombin seems a promising candidate in the panel of indicators for overt DIC whereas the value of plasma fibrinogen is in doubt.     

A multicenter,prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis

Introduction

To validate the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scoring system in patients with severe sepsis, we conducted a multicenter, prospective study at 15 critical care centers in tertiary care hospitals.

Methods

This study included 624 severe sepsis patients. JAAM DIC was scored on the day of diagnosis of severe sepsis (day 1) and day 4. Scores for disease severity and organ dysfunction were also evaluated.

Results

The prevalence of JAAM DIC was 46.8% (292/624), and 21% of the DIC patients were scored according to the reduction rate of platelets. The JAAM DIC patients were more seriously ill and exhibited more severe systemic inflammation, a higher prevalence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and worse outcomes than the non-DIC patients. Disease severity, systemic inflammation, MODS and the mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increased JAAM DIC score on day 1. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated lower 1-year survival in the JAAM DIC patients than in those without DIC (log-rank test P <0.001). The JAAM DIC score on day 1 (odds ratio = 1.282, P <0.001) and the Delta JAAM DIC score (odds ratio = 0.770, P <0.001) were independent predictors of 28-day death. Dynamic changes in the JAAM DIC score from days 1 to 4 also affected prognoses. The JAAM DIC scoring system included all patients who met the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis overt DIC criteria on day 1. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system missed a large number of nonsurvivors recognized by the JAAM scoring system.

Conclusions

The JAAM DIC scoring system exhibits good prognostic value in predicting MODS and poor prognosis in patients with severe sepsis and can detect more patients requiring treatment. Conducting repeated daily JAAM scoring increases the ability to predict the patient''s prognosis.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time waveform analysis: a new tool to detect infection?

OBJECTIVE: An abnormality of the optical transmission waveform obtained during measurement of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) has been described to identify a high-risk intensive care unit population consisting of patients with sepsis or with higher mortality rates than patients with normal aPTT waveforms. We investigated the abnormal aPTT biphasic waveform as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of infection. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study investigating the predictive value of aPTT waveform analysis for the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: We studied 187 consecutive patients who fulfilled at least two or more criteria of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome at admission or during intensive care stay and classified as having systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock during an 8-month period. INTERVENTIONS: Laboratory analyses including aPTT waveform analysis and procalcitonin and C-reactive protein concentrations were measured at days 1-3. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The final diagnoses were systemic inflammatory response syndrome in 49%, sepsis in 16%, severe sepsis in 12%, and septic shock in 23% of patients. On day 1, the biphasic waveform was significantly more abnormal in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock than in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. The biphasic waveform was more accurate than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for differentiating patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, with 90% sensitivity and 92% negative predictive value. Biphasic waveform values were significantly more abnormal during days 1-3 in septic nonsurvivors than in survivors and nonseptic nonsurvivors. The biphasic waveform exhibited the best specificity (91%) and negative predictive value (98%) for the prognosis of sepsis-related mortality on day 3. CONCLUSIONS: In intensive care units, when the analyzer is available, aPTT waveform analysis is an inexpensive, rapid, effective, and readily available tool providing information for the diagnosis of severe sepsis and the prognosis of septic patients.     

Screening tests of disseminated intravascular coagulation: guidelines for rapid and specific laboratory diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinician's ordering pattern in the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and to analyze the utility of selected tests by assessing their sensitivity, specificity, and overall efficiency. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, clinical study. SETTING: University hospital intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 82 inpatients treated in our intensive care units were identified from the hospital computer system as having been tested for DIC in a 3-month period. INTERVENTION: Screening tests for DIC were ordered for the suspected patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products (FDP), and fibrinogen were used most frequently as DIC diagnostic tests. The FDP and D-dimer combination (n = 39) had the highest diagnostic efficiency of 95%, with sensitivity being 91% and specificity 94%. This is followed by FDP (n = 71), efficiency 87%, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 67%; PT/PTT and FDP combination (n = 71), efficiency 86%, sensitivity 91%, and specificity 71%; and D-dimer (n = 44), efficiency 80%, sensitivity 91%, and specificity 68%. The rest of the commonly used tests, such as PT, PTT, thrombin time, platelet count, fibrinogen, and the presence of schistocytes (n = 80), had individually either low specificity or low sensitivity and, therefore, low efficiency scores (57%, 57%, 70%, 67%, 65%, and 51%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The D-dimer and FDP tests offered the best test panel in the diagnosis of DIC. We propose the use of D-dimer, FDP, and antithrombin as the DIC diagnostic test panel, with D-dimer and FDP providing a rapid and specific diagnosis, antithrombin providing insight to the severity and prognosis, and FDP (rapid and less expensive than D-dimer) to follow-up the progress of the condition once the diagnosis is established.     

Is protease inhibitor a choice for the treatment of pre- or mild disseminated intravascular coagulation?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a protease inhibitor, gabexate mesylate, on patients with pre- or mild disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in comparison with a control group receiving no anticoagulation therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: General intensive care unit at a general hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients (40) with a DIC score between 6 and 8 (pre- or mild DIC). INTERVENTIONS: In 20 patients, gabexate mesylate (2 mg/kg/hr) was administered as 2 mL/hr in saline (treated group) and in another 20 patients, saline (2 mL/hr; control group) was administered during the study (7 days). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following variables were determined at the time of admission to the intensive care unit before treatment and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days thereafter: platelet count, antithrombin III activity, serum or plasma concentrations of fibrinogen, fibrin degradation product, D-dimer, fibrin monomer, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, and plasmin-plasmin inhibitor complex, prothrombin time ratio, and DIC score. Two patients in the treated group and four in the control group were excluded from the study because they died during the study; therefore, 34 patients were analyzed. The measured variables of coagulation and fibrinolysis were not significantly different between the two groups, except for the D-dimer on day 3 (the treated group showed a higher concentration). D-dimer concentration and DIC score went down more quickly in the control group than the treated group, but not significantly. The mortality rate at 1 month was 40% (8 of 20) in the treated group and 35% (7 of 20) in the control group, without any differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a limited number of patients (n = 34), gabexate mesylate (2 mg/kg/hr) could not inhibit coagulation or fibrinolysis and gabexate mesylate could not improve the DIC score or mortality rate in pre- or mild DIC.     

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the pathophysiology, manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) as it occurs in cancer. DATA SOURCES: Published articles, research reports, and book chapters. CONCLUSIONS: The syndrome of DIC is a serious hypercoagulation state that in its acute form may be life-threatening. The hemorrhage and intravascular coagulation that occur with DIC may lead to irreversible morbidity and mortality. Prompt recognition and emergency treatment are necessary to help minimize morbidity and mortality. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can play an important role in early recognition of DIC to allow for prompt intervention. Nurses caring for patients affected by DIC will be providing complex nursing care, in addition to psychosocial support to patients and families.     

Epidemiology of severe sepsis in Japanese intensive care units: A prospective multicenter study

Severe sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in Japanese ICUs. The patients were registered at 15 general critical care centers in Japanese tertiary care hospitals when diagnosed as having severe sepsis. Of 14,417 patients, 624 (4.3%) were diagnosed with severe sepsis. Demographic and clinical characteristics at enrollment (Day 1), physiologic and blood variables on Days 1 and 4, and mortality were evaluated. Mean age was 69.0 years, and initial mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were 23.4 and 8.6, respectively. The 28-day mortality was 23.1%, and overall hospital mortality was 29.5%. SOFA score and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score were consistently higher in nonsurvivors than survivors on Days 1 and 4. SOFA score, DIC score on Days 1 and 4, and hospital mortality were higher in patients with than without septic shock. SOFA score on Days 1 and 4 and hospital mortality were higher in patients with than without DIC. Logistic regression analyses showed age, presence of septic shock, DIC, and cardiovascular dysfunction at enrollment to be predictors of 28-day mortality and presence of comorbidity to be an additional predictor of hospital mortality. Presence of septic shock or DIC resulted in approximately twice the mortality of patients without each factor, whereas the presence of comorbidity may be a significant predictor of delayed mortality in severe sepsis.     

产科急性DIC31例临床分析

目的探讨产科弥漫性血管内疑血（DIC）的病因及治疗。方法对31例产科DIC患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果31例产科DIC患者中有29例抢救成功,痊愈出院,2例死亡。13例行子宫切除。结论重视产后出血、重度子痫前期等原发病的防治,早期诊断,及时去除病因,抗休克,补充血容量、及时补充凝血因子、果断行子宫切除术是产科DIC治疗的关键。     

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

OBJECTIVE: To review the current knowledge on the clinical manifestation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). DATA SOURCE: Selected articles from the MEDLINE database. DATA SYNTHESIS: DIC may complicate a variety of disorders and can cause significant morbidity (in particular related to organ dysfunction and bleeding) and may contribute to mortality. The pathogenesis of DIC is based on tissue factor-mediated initiation of systemic coagulation activation that is insufficiently contained by physiologic anticoagulant pathways and amplified by impaired endogenous fibrinolysis. The diagnosis of DIC can be made using routinely available laboratory tests and scoring algorithms. Supportive treatment of DIC may be aimed at replacement of platelets and coagulation factors, anticoagulant treatment, and restoration of anticoagulant pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Insight into the pathogenesis of DIC has resulted in better strategies for clinical management, including straightforward diagnostic criteria and potentially beneficial supportive treatment options.     

弥散性血管内凝血评分在脓毒症中的应用

目的 研究弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)评分系统与脓毒症患者病情评估及预后间的关系.方法 回顾性分析2005年1月-2008年12月本院重症监护病房(ICU)收治315例脓毒症患者的资料,按住院28 d的预后分为生存组(194例)与死亡组(121例).比较两组患者血小板计数(PLT)、纤维蛋白原(Fib)、凝血酶原时间(PT)及纤维蛋白单体的差异;用logistic单因素回归分析急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、DIC评分与预后的关系,评价APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分在脓毒症诊断中的价值.结果 死亡组PLT、Fib显著低于生存组,PT、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血时间(ACT)和纤维蛋白单体值显著高于生存组,且APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分显著高于生存组(P<0.05或P<0.01).APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分与脓毒症预后间均呈显著正相关[DIC评分:χ2=17.741,P<0.001,优势比(OR)=1.413,95%可信区间(CI)为1.203～1.659;APACHEⅡ评分:χ2=36.456,P<0.001,OR=1.109,95%CI为1.072～1.147].APACHEⅡ评分曲线下面积(0.706)高于DIC评分曲线下面积(0.611).结论 APACHEⅡ评分、DIC评分均可作为脓毒症预后的预测指标,但DIC评分对脓毒症的诊断和预后判断价值低于APACHEⅡ评分.     

晚期腺癌合并弥散性血管内凝血患者姑息护理评估与实践

目的总结3例晚期腺癌患者合并弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)的姑息护理评估与实践经验。方法通过持续关注患者病情,及时发现DIC并动态评估其进展,加强出血、低血压休克的护理及舒缓照护等相关措施,帮助患者进行个人生命回顾,做好家属的支持与安抚。结果患者均采用对症支持治疗,遵从患者及家属意愿,于病情恶化昏迷后返家过世。结论对晚期腺癌合并弥散性血管内凝血患者进行姑息护理,可使患者有尊严地度过生命的最后时光。     

Plasma exchange as rescue therapy in multiple organ failure including acute renal failure

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of using a rescue therapy including plasma exchange given to patients with a progressive acute disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University and county hospital. PATIENTS: Included were 76 consecutive patients (41 men and 35 women) treated with plasma exchange as rescue therapy besides optimal conventional therapy during a progressive course of disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, including acute renal failure. Of the 76 patients, 66% needed dialysis. The distribution was hemodialysis in 76%, continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in 36%, continuous venovenous hemodialysis in 12%, and peritoneal dialysis in 24%. The median organ-failure score was 5 (range, 1-6). Seventy-two percent required mechanical ventilation; septic shock was present in 88%. The median septic shock score was 4 (range, 2-4). Nine patients had another reason than sepsis for the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. INTERVENTION: Plasma exchange (centrifugation technique) was performed until disseminated intravascular coagulation was reversed (median, two times; range, 1-14). Besides antibiotics and fluid administration, most patients received heparin or low molecular weight heparin (77%), steroids (87%), and inotropes (88%). More than one vasoactive drug was used in 57% of the patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of the patients survived and could leave the hospital. The previously observed survival rates by others for this category of patients would be <20%, and thus, the outcome in this study is significantly better. CONCLUSION: Plasma exchange using plasma as replacement may, in addition to conventional intensive care, help to reverse severe progressive disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and improve survival.     

Temporal changes in factors associated with neutrophil elastase and coagulation in intensive care patients with a biphasic waveform and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Summary. The biphasic waveform is an early marker of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Neutrophil elastase (NE) cleaves coagulation factors; thus, elevated elastase levels or its dysregulation by alpha-1-protease inhibitor (Alpha1PI) may be linked to DIC. Time courses over a period were determined for factors associated with NE and coagulation in 14 Intensive Care Unit patients with a biphasic waveform who developed DIC. The data were analyzed using a random coefficient linear regression model to predict the variables' mean values on day 0 and their mean rates of change over the period in which the biphasic waveform appeared. The biphasic waveform was normal on day 0, maximized on day 1, and approached normal again by day 4. Alpha1PI/NE complex levels were 2.5-fold greater than normal for the entire period. The A1PI activity, antigen, and specific activity levels were normal on day 0 and increased thereafter by 21.0, 10.5, and 8.9% of normal per day, respectively. Factor II, V, VII, IX, and X activity levels were, respectively, 57, 46, 46, 77, and 46% of normal on day 0, whereas factor VIII and fibrinogen levels were normal. All coagulation factor levels trended upward with time but not significantly. The prothrombin time, but not the activated partial thromboplastin time, was prolonged, and the platelet counts and hematocrits were below normal on day 0 and remained so thereafter. We conclude that events associated with neutrophil activation, elastase release, and perturbations of coagulation precede both the appearance of the biphasic waveform and the diagnosis of DIC in these patients.     

微量低分子肝素钙在严重创伤非显性DIC的临床研究

目的：评价微量低分子肝素钙治疗严重创伤非显性DIC的疗效.方法：将44例严重创伤非显性DIC患者随机分为两组, 治疗组和对照组各22例.两组均采用综合治疗,治疗组早期加用低分子肝素钙,24 h用药量0.2～ 0.3 mg/（k g·d）,连用3 d.比较两组伤口渗血发生率、DIC发生率及病死率,观察治疗组应用微量肝素前后BPC、PT、APTT变化情况.结果：与对照组比较,治疗组DIC发生率、病死率明显降低（P均＜0.01）,伤口渗血发生率减少（P＜0.05）;治疗组应用微量肝素后,BPC升高（P＜0.05）,APTT、PT差异无显著性（P＞0.05）.结论：应用低分子肝素钙能有效地防止严重创伤非显性DIC向DIC的发展,并能降低病死率.     

多指标协同应用在危重症合并血小板减少患者诊断DIC中的作用

目的通过对危重症治疗过程中出现血小板减少的患者进行观察,并进行有关凝血功能的检查,以争取早期发现、诊断弥漫性血管内凝血（DIC）。方法纳入出现血小板减少的危重症患者56例,进行DIC全套检查,并根据国际血栓与出血性疾病协会DIC诊断评分标准诊断DIC26例,根据四格表法分别对凝血酶原时间（PT）、部分活化凝血酶原时间（APTT）、凝血酶时间（TT）、纤维蛋白原总量（Fg）、抗凝血酶Ⅲ（ATⅢ）以及出血（包括皮下出血及淤斑）的敏感性、特异性、准确性、似然比及预测值进行诊断。结果PT延长、Fg降低的诊断特异性为87．0％;ATⅢ降低以及出现PT延长、Fg降低或出血三者之一诊断DIC的敏感性为96．0％。结论以血小板减少为基础的多指标联合诊断DIC可提高敏感性和特异性。     

Disseminated intravascular coagulation score is associated with mortality for children with shock

Objective  To evaluate the association between disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score and mortality for children with shock. Design  Retrospective. Setting  Tertiary care, 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit. Patients  A total of 132 children with sepsis or shock admitted from January 2003 to December 2005. Measurements and results  A total of 132 patients less than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of shock or sepsis were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 90 survived and 42 died (31.8%). Patients ranged from 6 days to 18 years (median 5.8 years), and were a majority male (63%). Variables associated with mortality included peak DIC score within 24 h of ICU admission, age, weight, volume of blood products transfused, inotrope score, pediatric index of mortality (PIM 2) score, 12-h pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM III) score and presence of mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05). Patients with DIC scores ≥ 5 (overt DIC) had 50% mortality, compared to 20% for patients with DIC scores < 5. Overall, a one-point rise in DIC score was associated with an increased risk of mortality after adjusting for age, race, gender, hemodynamic instability, and PRISM III score [OR 1.35 (1.02, 1.78)]. Most patients achieve their peak DIC score within 2 h of ICU admission. Conclusions  This analysis suggests that DIC score, easily calculated early in ICU admission, is associated with mortality for children with sepsis and shock, regardless of initial severity of illness or inotrope use.