Is the tono-pen accurate for measuring intraocular pressure in young children with congenital glaucoma?

PURPOSE: We sought to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Perkins tonometer and Tono-Pen in young children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative case series. We reviewed the clinical records of all children with primary congenital glaucoma who underwent examinations under general anesthesia at Soroka University Medical Center between January 1999 and July 2002. Our main outcome measures were IOP with Perkins hand-held tonometer and Tono-Pen tonometer. RESULTS: A total of 28 eyes of 16 children were examined under general anesthesia. The mean IOP was 18 +/- 6 mm Hg with the Perkins tonometer and 22 +/- 8 mm Hg with the Tono-Pen. In 18 eyes, IOP was less than 21 mm Hg with the Perkins tonometer; these eyes had already undergone surgical procedures. The other 10 eyes with IOP greater than 21 mm Hg with the Perkins tonometer underwent surgery at the end of the examination under anesthesia. In eyes with IOP greater than 16 mm Hg (Group A, n = 18), a significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the Perkins and Tono-Pen measurements, even although the values were strongly correlated (r = 0.60). In contrast, in eyes with IOP less than 16 mm Hg (Group B, n = 10) no statistically significant difference (P = 0.28) and good correlation (r = 0.78) were obtained. A difference of 5.8 +/- 3.8 mm Hg and 0.6 +/- 1.7 mm Hg between Perkins and Tono-Pen readings, respectively, was found in Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Tono-Pen readings disagree with Perkins tonometer measurements for measuring IOP in children with PCG who present with IOP greater than 16 mm Hg and tends to overestimate IOP. A further study with a similar population is necessary to confirm these results.     

The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured by tono-pen and rebound tonometer in children

PURPOSE: To find out the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) and radius of the corneal curvature on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometer (RBT) and Tono-Pen in healthy schoolchildren. METHODS: IOP was measured with Tono-Pen and RBT, respectively, in 165 healthy schoolchildren with a mean age 9.8+/-3.1 (range: 7 to 12 y) years. Corneal radius of curvature (in mm) was determined using a keratometer before CCT and IOP measurements. CCT was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. The effect of CCT, radius of the corneal curvature, and sex on measured IOP was evaluated by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean IOP readings were 17.47+/-2.7 mm Hg using Tono-Pen, and 16.81+/-3.1 mm Hg using RBT. Tono-Pen measured IOP values slightly greater than that of RBT (P=0.006). Mean CCT was found to be 561.37+/-33 microm. A significant association between measured IOP and CCT was found with each device (r=0.220 for the Tono-Pen, r=0.373 for the RBT; P=0.006 for the Tono-Pen and P<0.0001 for the RBT). The IOP increased 2.2 and 3.7 mm Hg for every 100-microm increase in CCT for the Tono-Pen and the RBT, respectively. The relation between IOP and CCT was not different for boys and girls. Mean radius of the corneal curvature readings was 7.68+/-0.41 mm (42.75+/-1.37 D) for both sexes. There was no significant relationship between either the mean corneal curvature readings, or CCT and IOP (r=0.02; P=0.4 for CCT and r=0.01; P=0.5 for IOP). CONCLUSIONS: Both the Tono-Pen and RBT have a systematic error in IOP readings caused by its dependence on CCT. The CCT measurements should be considered to ensure proper interpretation of IOP measurements in children, like in adults. The corneal radius of curvature had no significant effect on measured IOP with each device.     

Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by the Tono-Pen 2 tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) patients. SETTING: Refractive Surgery Center, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel. METHODS: In 18 patients, IOP was measured by GAT and then by Tono-Pen 2 tonometer 2 to 18 months following PRK (mean 6.6 months +/- 5.1 [SD]). Photorefractive keratectomy had been performed in 1 eye of each patient; the fellow eyes served as controls. Corneal curvature and thickness were evaluated. Ten of the 18 patients were treated with topical steroids. RESULTS: In the post-PRK eyes, mean GAT IOP was 1.8 +/- 3.1 mm Hg lower than mean Tono-Pen IOP (P = .012); there was no significant IOP difference in the control (fellow) eyes. In steroid-treated post-PRK eyes, mean GAT IOP (12.2 mm Hg) was 2.2 +/- 1.3 mm Hg lower than mean Tono-Pen IOP (14.4 mm Hg) (P = .0007). Mean Tono-Pen IOP in steroid-treated post-PRK eyes was 4.3 +/- 3 mm Hg higher than in the fellow eyes (P = .0014); mean GAT IOP was only 2.3 +/- 3.5 mm Hg higher (P = .04). In post-PRK eyes without topical steroid treatment, mean GAT IOP was 2.0 +/- 1.18 mm Hg lower than in the fellow eyes (P = .001); there was no significant difference in Tono-Pen IOP. There was a negative correlation between the difference in IOP values (Tono-Pen minus GAT) and corneal curvature in post-PRK eyes (r = 0.76, P = .0108, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: The Tono-Pen tonometer appeared to be less affected than the GAT by the relative flattening, thinning, and anterior stromal decreased rigidity of the central cornea that occur following PRK. Post-PRK steroid-induced IOP elevation may be masked by the artifactual decrease in GAT IOP.     

Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) with three different instruments, Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), noncontact tonometer, and Tono-Pen after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: A prospective case series study to evaluate preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements of 149 eyes at 12 months. We performed GAT, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen central, and Tono-Pen temporal periphery measurements. We also performed measurements of the central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultrasonic pachymetry and keratometry. Pre-operative IOP reading served as control for all studies. RESULTS: After PRK, IOP reading was significantly reduced in the treated eyes when compared with the control measurements (11.87+/-1.73 vs. 13.37+/-1.52 mm Hg, p<0.0001 with GAT; 12.07+/-1.6 vs. 13.51+/-1.59 mm Hg, p<0.0001 with noncontact tonometer; 12.18+/-1.6 vs. 13.48+/-1.55 mm Hg, p<0.0001 with Tono-Pen central; 13.48+/-1.65 vs. 13.71+/-1.56 Hg, p<0.0104 with Tono-Pen temporal periphery). There was also a significant correlation between IOP reading changes measured by GAT, noncontact tonometer, Tono-Pen central, and change of CCT and between reduction of IOP reading and keratometry (r2>0.39, p<0.0001 for each). The correlation between IOP reading change by Tono-Pen temporal periphery and CCT was also significant but r2 value was only 0.034. Tono-Pen temporal periphery postoperative IOP measurements had the best correlation with preoperative GAT IOP (r2 = 0.57, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PRK reduced IOP reading as measured by GAT, noncontact tonometer, and Tono-Pen central; less so when measured by Tono-Pen temporal periphery. Early detection of glaucoma and IOP follow-up in glaucoma patients may be done best by peripheral Tono-Pen measurements over the nonablated cornea.     

Effect of corneal thickness on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement in rabbits after excimer laser photoablation

PURPOSE: To determine whether intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using pneumotonometry and Tono-Pen tonometry are accurate after excimer laser photoablation of the central cornea in rabbits. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Scott & White Hospital, Texas A & M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA. METHODS: Ten rabbits had excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in the right eye to thin the central corneal thickness (CCT) by approximately 20%. The left eye served as the control. The diameter of each PTK was 6.0 mm. Four weeks later, the rabbits were examined under general anesthesia. The eyes were cannulated, and IOP was maintained at 10, 20, and 30 mm Hg and measured using an IOP transducer, Tono-Pen, and pneumotonometer at each pressure level. The readings were compared. RESULTS: One rabbit was excluded from the study because of recurrent erosions and corneal edema. There was no statistically significant difference in measurement error between the operated eye and control eye for the Tono-Pen (P = .12) or pneumotonometer (P = .35). There were significant differences in measurement error as pressure increased for the Tono-Pen (P < .01) and pneumotonometer (P < .01). The increase in measurement error with the increase in pressure was similar in the 2 eyes: Tono-Pen (P = .96) and pneumotonometer (P = .55). A paired t test showed the observed CCT was comparable (P = .79) in the pre-laser right eyes (mean 400.56 microm +/- 11.29 [SD]) and control eyes (mean 401.78 +/- 19.78 microm). CONCLUSION: Photoablation of approximately 20% of the CCT in rabbits by excimer laser PTK did not significantly alter the accuracy of IOP measurements by the Tono-Pen or pneumotonometer.     

Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in patients with keratoconus (KC), pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), and unilateral penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for KC by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Tono-Pen tonometry (TP), and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: Patients with KC, PMD, or PK were included in a prospective study. IOPs were measured by GAT, TP, and DCT. Severity of ectasia was determined by the steep curvature by corneal topography and central thinning by contact ultrasound pachymetry. IOP measurements were compared and correlated with disease severity. RESULTS: Fifty-three eyes of 36 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 45.3 +/- 12.5 years (range: 28-72 years). Twenty-nine eyes had KC, 21 eyes had a PK for KC, and 3 eyes had PMD. Mean DCT, GAT, and TP readings were 16.1 +/- 2.9, 14.3 +/- 4.1, and 13.8 +/- 4.1 mm Hg, respectively. The differences of mean IOP between GAT and DCT and TP and DCT were statistically significant, whereas the difference between GAT and TP was not. Both GAT and TP readings were significantly higher in the PK eyes than the KC and PMD eyes, whereas DCT readings were not. DCT measurements were not significantly different in PK versus non-PK eyes. CONCLUSION: DCT is a newly Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device that is designed to measure IOP, independent of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and ocular rigidity. DCT gave significantly higher IOP readings than GAT and TP in this study. DCT readings were not affected by corneal thickness. DCT may be more accurate in IOP measurement in eyes with KC and PMD.     

The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken by the Goldmann applanation tonometer, the Tono-Pen and the ocular blood flow pneumotonometer in eyes with varying central corneal thickness (CCT) due to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), keratoconus (KC), and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED). METHODS: IOP was measured with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen XL, and OBF pneumotonometer in 127 eyes with the following corneal abnormalities. There were 56 eyes that had undergone PK, 37 eyes with KC, and 34 eyes with FED. CCT was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter after IOP determinations had been made. RESULTS: Mean IOP measurements in all three patient groups were significantly higher when measured by OBF pneumotonometer. Linear regression analysis showed that patients with FED had a significant increase in IOP with increasing CCT of 0.18 mm Hg/10 microm using the Goldmann tonometer, 0.15 mm Hg/10 microm with the Tono-Pen, and 0.26 mm Hg/10 microm with the OBF pneumotonometer. In patients with KC and after PK, linear regression analysis did not show a significant effect of CCT on IOP. A multivariate linear regression model controlling for age, sex, graft size, and patient group, showed that the effect of CCT on IOP for Tono-Pen (0.13 mm Hg/10 microm CCT) and Goldmann (0.14 mm Hg/10 microm CCT) were significantly lower than for the OBF pneumotonometer (0.26 mm Hg/10 microm CCT). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that mean IOP measurements using the OBF pneumotonometer were significantly higher than those made using the Goldmann applanation tonometer or Tono-Pen in eyes with a variety of cornel pathologies. The OBF pneumotonometer was found to be most affected by variation in CCT. For all three instruments, the relation between IOP and CCT depended on the corneal pathology and was greatest for FED.     

Intraocular pressure measurement over amniotic membrane patch in human subjects

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement over amniotic membrane patching on human ocular surface using Tono-Pen tonometry. METHODS: The IOP of 28 normal eyes in 14 volunteers (mean age, 27.6 years; range, 25-34) was measured by a handy applanation tonometer and the Tono-Pen XL. Then, a single layer of amniotic membrane (approximately 50 microm) was placed onto the corneal surface of the volunteers and the IOP was again measured using the Tono-Pen XL. RESULTS: The average IOP using handy applanation tonometry and the Tono-Pen was 14.3 +/- 2.1 and 14.3 +/- 2.4 mm Hg, respectively. In the presence of amniotic membrane, the average IOP was not significantly overestimated (14.7 +/- 2.6 mm Hg). The bias between handy applanation tonometry or the Tono-Pen XL without amniotic membrane and the Tono-Pen XL with amniotic membrane was only -0.40 and -0.18 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Tono-Pen XL is accurate and useful for IOP monitoring even in eyes with amniotic membrane patching.     

Central and peripheral pressure measurements with the Goldmann tonometer and Tono-Pen after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

To compare the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry with that of the Tono-Pen(R) in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).Eye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.Thirty-five eyes (25 patients) had PRK for a mean myopia of -6.2 diopters +/- 2.6 (SD). Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed first with the Goldmann tonometer and then with the Tono-Pen in 2 corneal locations: centrally in the usual manner and temporally. For the temporal measurements, the patient was directed to gaze nasally as the tonometer was placed perpendicular to the temporal portion of the cornea and with the rim of the tonometer positioned just inside the limbus of the cornea. Subsequently, similar measurements were made with the Tono-Pen. Measurements were performed before and 1 and 3 months after PRK. Preoperative IOPs measured centrally and temporally were similar. After PRK, the central pressure readings with the Goldmann tonometer and the Tono-Pen were between 1.8 and 2.3 mm Hg lower than those measured temporally. The differences were statistically significant (P <.0001).Central corneal pressure readings obtained with either the Goldmann tonometer or the Tono-Pen after myopic PRK are inaccurate. Measurements over the temporal part of the cornea are likely more reliable.     

A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability

AIM: To compare the inter-method agreement in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made with four different tonometric methods. METHODS: IOP was measured with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tono-Pen XL, ocular blood flow tonograph (OBF), and Canon TX-10 non-contact tonometer (NCT) in a randomised order in one eye of each of 105 patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Three measurements were made with each method, and by each of two independent GAT observers. GAT interobserver and tonometer inter-method agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The outcome measures were 95% limits of agreement for IOP measurements between GAT observers and between tonometric methods, and 95% confidence intervals for intra-session repeated measurements. RESULTS: The mean differences (bias) in IOP measurements were 0.4 mm Hg between GAT observers, and 0.6 mm Hg, 0.1 mm Hg, and 0.7 mm Hg between GAT and Tono-Pen, OBF, and NCT, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement were smallest (bias +/-2.6 mm Hg) between GAT observers, and larger for agreement between the GAT and the Tono-Pen, OBF, and NCT (bias +/-6.7, +/-5.5, and +/-4.8 mm Hg, respectively). The OBF and NCT significantly underestimated GAT measurements at lower IOP and overestimated these at higher IOP. The repeatability coefficients for intra-session repeated measurement for each method were +/-2.2 mm Hg and +/-2.5 mm Hg for the GAT, +/-4.3 mm Hg for the Tono-Pen, +/-3.7 mm Hg for the OBF, and +/-3.2 mm Hg for the NCT. CONCLUSIONS: There was good interobserver agreement with the GAT and moderate agreement between the NCT and GAT. The differences between the GAT and OBF and between the GAT and Tono-Pen probably preclude the OBF and Tono-Pen from routine clinical use as objective methods to measure IOP in normal adult eyes.     

Tono-Pen determination of intraocular pressure in patients with band keratopathy or glued cornea

AIMS—To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in patients with band keratopathy or glued corneas obtained from affected and non-affected areas.
METHODS—15 patients with band keratopathy or glued corneas were prospectively recruited. When both eyes were affected, only the right eye was analysed. Tono-Pen readings of IOP were obtained sequentially from the affected and non-affected corneal surface. Additionally, Goldmann applanation tonometry was attempted.
RESULTS—Determination of IOP with the Tono-Pen was possible in all cases, while Goldmann tonometry was not performed in three patients because of severe corneal irregularities. The average of the Tono-Pen readings obtained from the affected cornea (34.8 (SD 14.0) mm Hg) was consistently and significantly higher (p<0.001) than mean IOP obtained by the Tono-Pen from the non-affected area (14.8 (4.3) mm Hg). The average of Goldmann tonometry readings (14.4 (6.1) mm Hg) did not differ significantly from the Tono-Pen values obtained from the non-affected corneal area (p=0.47) but was significantly lower than the Tono-Pen measurements obtained from the affected area (p<0.001)
CONCLUSION—In patients with band keratopathy or glued corneas determination of IOP by Tono-Pen tonometry varies from affected to non-affected area. The Tono-Pen overestimates the level of IOP when it is applied to areas with band keratopathy or with glue.

Keywords: intraocular pressure; applanation tonometry; Tono-Pen; keratopathy     

The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) using the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), compared with the Goldmann tonometer. METHODS: Thirty young healthy subjects (23.0 +/- 3.0 years) were recruited from the student population at the University of New South Wales. Thick hydroxyethyl methacrylate contact lenses were worn monocularly for 2 hours under closed-eye conditions to induce corneal edema via hypoxia. IOP (Goldmann and Pascal DCT), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in both eyes before and after lens wear. Paired t-tests, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman plots were used to identify changes in, and relationships between, these parameters resulting from corneal edema. RESULTS: Lens wear resulted in statistically significant changes in CCT (+48.3 +/- 14.4 microm, p < 0.001), Goldmann IOP (+1.5 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, p = 0.007), and Pascal DCT IOP (-0.7 +/- 1.1 mm Hg, p = 0.001) but not OPA (0.0 +/- 0.3 mm Hg, p = 0.721, two-tailed paired t-test). The Pascal DCT provided IOP readings that were 1.3 +/- 2.0 mm Hg higher than the Goldmann IOP readings when hydration was normal, but the Goldmann tonometer provided readings that were 0.8 +/- 2.5 mm Hg higher than the Pascal DCT readings when the cornea was edematous. The variation between the two instruments was weakly correlated to the change in CCT (r = -0.261, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens-induced corneal edema caused a small underestimation error in IOP measurements by the Pascal DCT, and an overestimation error in Goldmann tonometry measurements. The OPA measurement provided by the Pascal DCT is insensitive to corneal edema-induced changes in corneal properties.     

The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye

AIM: To measure corneal and scleral radii of curvature in response to intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: Using digital photographic profile images of 16 fresh porcine eyes, the curvatures of the cornea and sclera were determined in response to five consecutive incremental 100 mul saline intravitreal injections. IOP was measured and ocular rigidity calculated. Elastic moduli of the cornea and sclera were estimated. RESULTS: Intraocular pressure and the radius of curvature of the sclera increased linearly with increasing volume. There was no statistical change in corneal curvature. The elasticity of the cornea and sclera was constant during the 15-50 mm Hg increase in IOP. The estimated range of the elastic moduli of the cornea and sclera were, respectively 0.07-0.29 MPa and 0.2 MPa to 0.5 MPa. The scleral rigidity ranged from 0.0017 to 0.0022. CONCLUSIONS: The elastic moduli of the cornea and sclera are independent of IOP. The modulus of elasticity of the sclera is higher than that of the cornea. Elevation of IOP changes the curvature of the sclera but not that of the cornea. Porcine scleral rigidity is similar to human scleral rigidity. Scleral curvature could be a novel method for measuring IOP.     

Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: Thinning of the corneal stroma by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) results in inaccurate low intraocular pressure (IOP) readings by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is a novel measuring technique, designed to measure IOP largely independent of corneal thickness and curvature. The purpose of this study was to compare IOP measurements using GAT and DCT in eyes undergoing LASIK for correction of myopia. METHODS: In a prospective, single-center study, central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP were measured in patients undergoing first-time LASIK for myopia. IOP was measured before and after surgery using GAT and DCT. The untreated contralateral eyes served as paired controls. RESULTS: There was good concordance between the two tonometers in 62 normal eyes before LASIK. Corneal ablation of 90.0 +/- 49.18 micro m (median +/- SD) reduced IOP readings as measured by GAT by 3.0 +/- 1.9 mm Hg (P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant change in IOP readings was recorded by DCT (-0.2 mm Hg +/- 1.5 mm Hg, P = 0.30). There was no change in IOP in the untreated control eyes as measured by GAT and DCT. CONCLUSIONS: Significant decreases in IOP were recorded by GAT after LASIK for myopia. Measurements by DCT, however, did not reveal any significant changes in IOP.     

Ex vivo evaluation of Tono-Pen and pneumotonometry in cat eyes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity and intraobserver reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with both pneumotonometry and the Tono-Pen in a closed ex vivo system in cat eyes. METHODS: IOP was increased step by step in 5 enucleated cat eyes, while taking IOP measurements with the Tono-Pen and pneumotonometry. The outcomes were compared to readings of a digital manometer simultaneously measuring the actual pressure in the anterior chamber. RESULTS: Pneumotonometry overestimated IOP below 15 mm Hg and underestimated pressures above 20 mm Hg. Tono-Pen tonometry considerably underestimated IOP over the whole spectrum in all of the eyes tested. The pneumotonometer was identified as the more valid and reliable instrument for cat eyes. CONCLUSION: Both tonometers are clinically useful tools to assess IOP for glaucoma studies using a cat animal model. However, one has to consider underestimation of IOP in the upper ranges. A correction formula can be used to calculate the actual IOP.     

Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometer,tono-pen,and pneumatonometer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with three tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen, and pneumatonometer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of a clinic-based population undergoing elective LASIK surgery for myopia correction, IOP measurements were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively with a Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen, and pneumatonometer. Central corneal thickness and keratometric and astigmatism measurements were also obtained before and after surgery. A paired test was used to evaluate the significance of differences between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements with each instrument. Linear regression was used to correlate IOP measurements with degree of myopia corrected, astigmatism, and central corneal thickness before and after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 66 eyes of 34 individuals with a mean preoperative refractive error of -5.66 + 2.3 D (mean + SD). The reduction of central corneal thickness after LASIK of 0.032 + 0.030 mm (mean + SD) was statistically significant ( < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant change in mean IOP after the procedure with the Goldmann applanation tonometer or the Tono-Pen, while the pneumatonometer, was associated with a small but statistically significant decrease in mean IOP of 1.1 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: In this group of patients with mild to moderate myopia, LASIK had little or no statistically significant influence on IOP readings obtained with a Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen, or pneumatonometer. This finding is in contrast to earlier reports of greater amounts of myopic correction, in which significant reductions in measured IOP were observed. Further study is needed to determine whether a critical amount of corneal change after LASIK is required to have a significant effect on IOP measurements.     

Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice ophthalmologists often need a tonometer which is independent of a slit lamp. Such a hand-held device is the Tono-Pen. We compared the precision of two equal Tono-Pens with Goldmann applanation tonometry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) was done in 100 eyes of 51 patients (mean age 63 +/- 15 years) suffering from ocular hypertension or glaucoma. According to a random table either the right or left eye was measured using Goldmann tonometer first and the Tono-Pen second. For the other eye the measurement was reversed. One of the two equal Tono-Pens (Solan/USA) was used according to a second random table. Three measurements were obtained with each instrument on both eyes within 15 minutes subsequently. Patients were placed in an upright position for all measurements. RESULTS: Even for well-trained ophthalmologists a learning curve of approximately 10 measurements was observed using the Tono-Pen. The Tono-Pen measured an average IOP of 16.9 mm Hg in all 100 eyes. The Goldmann tonometer measured an average IOP of 17.7 mm Hg. The difference was not statistically significant. The standard deviation for all measurements was better for the Tono-Pen (4.7 mm Hg vs 5.8 mm Hg for Goldmann tonometer). No reduction of the IOP after Tono-Pen measurement was observed (in contrast to the Goldmann tonometer). The reproducibility of the Tono-Pen on the same eye was inferior to the Goldmann tonometer by a factor of 2. There was an almost significant difference in reproducibility between two equal Tono-Pens. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IOP with the Tono-Pen is comparable to Goldmann applanation tonometry if an average of 3 measurements is used. The difference between two equal Tono-Pens indicates the need for improvement of the quality check during production.     

Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements of the Ocular Blood Flow (OBF) pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen in eyes with normal corneas of various thicknesses. METHODS: IOP was measured with an OBF pneumotonometer, Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometer in random order in 181 eyes with normal corneas. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. Right and left eyes were analyzed separately for statistical purposes. RESULTS: With all instruments, IOP varied with CCT, even though the variation in IOP was large. Readings with the OBF pneumotonometer showed a mean increase in IOP with increasing CCT of 0.28 mm Hg/10 microm, an increase of 0.23 mm Hg/10 microm with the Goldmann tonometer, and of 0.10 mm Hg/10 microm with the Tono-Pen. The OBF pneumotonometer consistently recorded comparatively higher IOPs than the other two instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The Tono-Pen is least affected by CCT when used to measure IOP in eyes with normal corneas. The OBF pneumotonometer appears to be more affected by variation in CCT than the Goldmann tonometer. This is contrary to expectations, based on the mechanism of measurement of IOP of the OBF pneumotonometer.     

Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate period after phacoemulsification

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of hypotony or intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes in the early period after clear corneal phacoemulsification in normal and glaucomatous eyes. SETTING: Ambulatory surgical center. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised 112 eyes that had clear corneal phacoemulsification. Postoperative IOP measurements were collected 30 minutes, 1 day, and 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-three eyes had an IOP of 5 mm Hg or below 30 minutes postoperatively. The IOP at 30 minutes was lower than at 1 day in both the normal and the glaucoma group. The mean IOP in the normal group was 10.0 mm Hg +/- 4.3 (SD) at 30 minutes and 16.9 +/- 4.4 mm Hg at 1 day (P < or = .005). The means in the glaucoma group were 9.6 +/- 3.9 mm Hg and 16.9 +/- 5.7 mm Hg, respectively (P < or = .0002). The IOPs at 30 minutes and 1 day were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of eyes having clear corneal phacoemulsification had an IOP of 5 mm Hg or less 30 minutes after surgery. Even though there were no postoperative complications from hypotony and there was a relative absence of significant IOP elevation 1 day postoperatively, the frequency of low IOP at 30 minutes suggests that consideration be given to leaving postoperative eyes with a higher IOP at the completion of phacoemulsification rather than with the estimated 10 mm Hg tactile IOP strived for in this study.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry

PURPOSE: The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT; Pascal tonometer) is a novel tonometer designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) independent of corneal properties. The purpose of this study was a comparison of the DCT with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with respect to mean of IOP readings, the influence of ocular structural factors on IOP readings, and both intra- and interobserver variability, in a large group of healthy subjects. METHODS: In a prospective study of 228 eyes, IOP measurements by GAT and DCT were compared, and the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, axial length, and anterior chamber depth were analyzed. To evaluate intra- and interobserver variability, IOP was measured in eight eyes by four observers. RESULTS: There was a high concordance between the IOP readings obtained by DCT and GAT. However, IOP readings were consistently higher with DCT than with GAT (median difference: +1.7 mm Hg, interquartile range [25th-75th percentile] = 0.8-2.7 mm Hg). In contrast to GAT, multivariable regression analysis showed no significant effect of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, and axial length on DCT readings. For repeated measurements the intraobserver variability was 0.65 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.1 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.008). Interobserver variability was 0.44 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.28 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: IOP measurements by DCT are highly concordant with IOP readings obtained from GAT but do not vary in CCT and have a lower intra- and interobserver variability. DCT seems to be an appropriate method of tonometry for routine clinical use.