Investigation of the effects of various antibiotics against Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms on in vitro catheter model

Klebsiella pneumoniae continues to be an important cause of community-acquired and nosocomial infection. This bacterium can cause catheter related infections by forming biofilm on the surface of catheter. The aim of our study is to determine the in vitro stability and efficacy of colistin, ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, doripenem and tigecycline alone, or in combination with clarithromycin or esomeprazole, as 24-h lock solutions against biofilm-embedded K. pneumoniae strains. The efficacy of antibiotic lock solutions was tested in an in vitro catheter biofilm model against K. pneumoniae. In our study, we observed that the use of doripenem and tobramycin as a lock solution had potent bactericidal effects. When colistin was used in combination with clarithromycin or esomeprazole, the combinations had a synergistic effect. No antagonistic effect was observed. The findings of our study have important information for effectiveness of tested antibiotic lock solution in the catheter-related infections with K. pneumoniae.     

Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of melittin and colistin,alone and in combination with antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria

In vitro antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMPs) – melittin and colistin – both alone and in combination with antibiotics were evaluated against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index were determined by the microbroth dilution and chequerboard techniques, respectively. The time-kill curve (TKC) method was used for determining the bactericidal activities of AMPs alone and in combination. Measurements of anti-biofilm activities were performed spectrophotometrically for both inhibition of attachment and 24-hour biofilm formation at MIC or subMIC. According to MIC₉₀ values, the most active agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were colistin, imipenem and ciprofloxacin, respectively. In combination studies, synergistic effects were mostly seen with colistin–imipenem against E. coli and K. pneumoniae (50 and 54%, respectively), colistin–ciprofloxacin against P. aeruginosa (77%). In TKC studies, synergism was observed with almost all expected combinations, even more frequently than chequerboard method. All of the antimicrobial agents were able to inhibit attachment and 24-hour biofilm formation between 0–57% at 1/10?×?MIC and 7–73% at 1?×?or 1/10?×?MIC, respectively. AMPs seem to be a good candidate for antimicrobial chemotherapy with their antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities as a single agent or in combination with antibiotics.     

Postantibiotic effect of colistin alone and combined with vancomycin or meropenem against Acinetobacter spp. with well defined resistance mechanisms

Previous studies found short postantibiotic effect of colistin on Acinetobacter baumannii. Many studies have evaluated the potential for synergy between colistin and other antibiotics against A. baumannii. The aim of this study was to determine in vitro synergy and postantibiotic effect (PAE) of colistin alone and combined with other antibiotics (vancomycin or meropenem) against eight carbapenem-non-susceptible Acinetobacter spp. strains with defined resistance mechanisms. It was hypothesised that vancomycin or meropenem would prologue the PAE of colistin since it was previously found that they exert synergism with colistin in time-kill kinetics and chequerboard analysis. After exposure of 1?hour colistin alone exhibited the negative (???0.07?hour) (OXA-143), short (0.2–1.82?hours) (OXA-24, OXA-58, OXA-72, VIM-1+OXA-23, OXA-58+NDM-1, ISAba1/OXA-69) or moderate PAE (3.2?hours) for OXA-23 positive strain. When combined with vancomycin, the PAE was moderate (1.7–4?hours) with OXA-23, OXA-23+VIM-1, OXA-72 and OXA-24 positive strains while with OXA-58, OXA-143, OXA-58/NDM-1 and ISAba1/OXA-69 positive strains, it was not possible to calculate mean duration of PAE because there was no regrowth after exposure to antibiotics or it was longer than 5?hours. The combination with meropenem resulted in short (0.2?hours) (OXA-143), moderate (2.4–3.73?hours) (OXA-24, OXA-58, OXA-23, OXA-23+VIM-1), long PAE of 5?hours (OXA-23) or longer than 5?hours (OXA-58+VIM-1, ISAba1/OXA-69). From the clinical point of view, the prolongation of colistin PAE when combined with other antibiotics could provide a rationale for the modification of the dosing interval and could be important for the optimization of the treatment regimen and the minimization of drug-induced side effects.     

In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Meropenem in Combination with Polymyxin B and Gatifloxacin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract

The antimicrobial activity of meropenem combined with either polymyxin B or gatifloxacin was evaluated by the checkerboard method against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10 strains) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10 strains). In addition, the triple combination of polymyxin B, gatifloxacin, and meropenem was also studied as well as the polymyxin B and gatifloxacin combination. A partial synergism interaction between meropenem and polymyxin B was observed for 80% of the A. baumannii strains. In contrast, this combination showed an indifferent effect for 80% of the P. aeruginosa strains tested. The combination of meropenem and gatifloxacin showed synergism only for two strains of A. baumannii, and partial synergism and additive effect for seven strains and indifference for four strains of both species. For the strains of P. aeruginosa, the double combination of polymyxin B and gatifloxacin and the triple combination of meropenem, polymyxin B and gatifloxacin were indifferent for the majority of the strains tested, that is, 90 and 80% respectively.     

In- Vitro Activity of Meropenem,a New Carbapenem,Against Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Xanthomonas maltophilia

Summary

The activity of meropenem, a new carbapenem, as well as imipenem, ceftazidime, aztreonam, tobramycin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin against 18 strains of Xanthomonas maltophilia and 23 strains of Pseudotnonas aeruginosa resistant to imipenem was tested. All strains of X. maltophilia were resistant to both penems. Ceftazidime, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin were the most active antimicrobial agents against this specie. 17% of imipenem-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa were sensitive to meropenem. Ciprofloxacin, amikacin and aztreonam were the most effective agents against these strains.     

Susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum to Tetracycline,Doxycycline, Erythromycin,Roxithromycin, Clarithromycin,Azithromycin, Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin

Abstract

The in vitro activity of tetracycline, doxycycline, erythromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin was tested against 63 clinical isolates of Ureaplasma urealyticum. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined by the broth microdilution method in A7 medium. The miC50 and miC90 of the tested agents after 24 h of incubation were as follows: Tetracycline, 0.5 and 2.0 μg/ml; doxycycline, 0.125 and 0.25 μg/ml; erythromycin, 2.0 and 8.0 μg/ml; roxithromycin, 2.0 and 4.0 μg/ml; clarithromycin, 0.25 and 1.0 μg/ml; azithromycin, 2.0 and 4.0 μg/ml; levofloxacin, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml; and moxifloxacin, 0.5 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC values after 24 h and 48 h incubation differed by no more than one dilution for all the agents with the exception of doxycycline (two dilution difference for MIC₉₀). Overall, moxifloxacin was the most active agent in vitro against U. Urealyticum, with the narrowest difference between MIC and MBC values, followed closely by levofloxacin. Clarithromycin was the most active macrolide.     

In Vitro Activity of Meropenem against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

The in-vitro susceptibilities of a total of 174 ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were determined. According to the BSAC and NCCLS breakpoints, meropenem, aztreonam, ceftibuten, ceftazidime, imipenem and cefotaxime were the most active (>90%) antimicrobial agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Susceptibility of these strains to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefpodoxime and cefixime (84.96%) was higher than that to tobramycin, gentamicin and fosfomycin (50-75%). More than 90% of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to meropenem when both interpretative susceptibility breakpoint criteria were used. Piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime were active against 50-75% of the same strains. Meropenem was the most active antimicrobial tested against all ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates assayed.     

In vitro effects of sulbactam combinations with different antibiotic groups against clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates

Abstract

Treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections causes some problems as a result of possessing various antibacterial resistance mechanisms against available antibiotics. Combination of antibiotics, acting by different mechanisms, is used for the treatment of MDR bacterial infections. It is an important factor to determine synergy or antagonism between agents in the combination for the constitution of effective therapy. The study aimed to determine in vitro interactions interpreted according to calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index between sulbactam and ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, tigecycline, and colistin. Ten clinical isolates of A. baumannii were tested for determination of synergistic effects of sulbactam with different antimicrobial combinations. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of both sulbactam and combined antibiotics decreased 2- to 128-fold. Synergy and partial synergy were determined in combination of sulbactam with ceftazidime and gentamicin (FIC index: ≤0·5 or >0·5 to <1) and MIC values of both ceftazidime and gentamicin for five isolates fell down below the susceptibility break point. Similarly, MIC value of ciprofloxacin for six ciprofloxacin resistant isolates was determined as below the susceptibility break point in combination. However, all isolates were susceptible to colistin and tigecycline, MIC values of both were decreased in combination with sulbactam. Although synergistic and partial synergistic effects were observed in the combination of sulbactam and ceftriaxone, all isolates remained resistant to ceftriaxone. The effect of cefepime–sulbactam combination was synergy in five, partial synergy in one and indifferent in four isolates. Meropenem and sulbactam showed a partial synergistic effect (FIC index: >0·5 to <1) in three, an additive effect (FIC index: 1) in one and an indifferent effect (FIC index: >1–2) in six isolates. Antagonism was not determined in any combination for clinical A. baumannii isolates in the study. In conclusion, sulbactam is a good candidate for combination treatment regimes for MDR A. baumannii infections.     

Multicentric study in five African countries of antibiotic susceptibility for three main pathogens: Streptococcus pneumoniae,Staphylococcus aureus,and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Antibiotic resistance is a growing clinical and epidemiological problem. We report on the antibiotic susceptibility of three pathogens isolated from patients in Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Senegal, and Tunisia during 2010–2011. In total, 218 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 428 Staphylococcus aureus, and 414 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were collected. S. pneumoniae resistance was noted against penicillin (30.2%), erythromycin (27.4%), cefpodoxime (19.1%), amoxicillin (12.0%), cefotaxime (7.4%), and levofloxacin (3.2%). All the strains were teicoplanin susceptible. Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistance differed between countries, from 5.0% in Senegal to 62.7% in Egypt. Levofloxacin resistance was low in all countries, and the highest rate (in Egypt) was still only 13.6% for intermediate and resistant strains combined. Most strains were susceptible to fosfomycin (99.3%) and pristinamycin (94.2%). P. aeruginosa resistance was found against levofloxacin (30.4%), ciprofloxacin (29.9%), tobramycin (19.7%), ceftazidime (19.2%), and imipenem (17.9%), but not colistin. Antibiotic susceptibility varied widely between countries, with resistance typically most prevalent in Egypt.     

Determination of synergy between sulbactam,meropenem and colistin in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and correlation with the molecular mechanism of resistance

Treatment of infections with carbapenem-resistant Gram negative organism is a major challenge especially among intensive care patients. Combinations of sulbactam, meropenem and colistin was studied for its synergistic activity against 100 invasive isolates of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex by checkerboard assay and time kill assay (TKA). In addition, presence of carbapenemase production was determined by multiplex PCR. Time kill assay detected more synergy than checkerboard assay. Good bactericidal activity of 70–100% was noted with the combinations tested. Among K. pneumoniae, isolates producing NDM carbapenemase alone showed significantly more synergy than isolates producing OXA-48-like carbapenemases. In treatment of infection with carbapenem-resistant organisms, the site of infection and the type of carbapenemase produced may help to determine the most effective combination of antimicrobials.     

Comparing normal saline versus diluted heparin to lock non-valved totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients: a randomised,non-inferiority,open trial

BackgroundHeparin has been used for years as a locking solution in totally implantable venous access devices. Normal saline (NS) might be a safe alternative for heparin. However, evidence of non-inferiority of NS versus heparin is lacking.Patients and methodsWe randomly allocated 802 cancer patients with a newly inserted port either to heparin lock (300 U/3 ml) or to NS lock groups in a 1:1 assignment ratio. The primary outcome was the number of functional complications, which was defined as ‘easy injection, impossible aspiration’ at port access. Secondary outcomes included all functional problems and catheter-related bacteraemia. We hypothesised that NS locks do not cause more functional problems and catheter-related bacteraemia than heparin locks. Non-inferiority is established if the upper limit of the confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk of NS versus heparin is <1.4.ResultsThree hundred and eighty-two patients from the NS group and 383 from the heparin lock group were included in the analysis. The incidence rate of our primary outcome (easy injection, impossible aspiration) was 3.70% (95% CI 2.91%–4.69%) and 3.92% (95% CI 3.09%–4.96%) of accesses in the NS and heparin groups, respectively. The relative risk was 0.94% (95% CI 0.67%–1.32%). Catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.03 per 1000 catheter days in the NS group and 0.10 per 1000 catheter days in the heparin group.ConclusionNS is a safe and effective locking solution in implantable ports if combined with a strict protocol for device insertion and maintenance.     

In Vitro Efficacy of Levofloxacin Alone or in Combination Tested Against Multi-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains

Abstract

Levofloxacin, the S(-) isomer of ofloxacin, demonstrates In Vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. To further characterize this activity, levofloxacin was tested against three populations of recent clinical isolates categorized by their resistance patterns to several other anti-pseudomonal agents. Results demonstrate the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for levofloxacin were generally two- to fourfold higher than for ciprofloxacin. Higher fluoroquinolone MICs were associated with MIC increases in other drugs. Levofloxacin demonstrated cross resistance against ciprofloxacin-resis-tant strains. Combinations of levofloxacin and several co-drugs revealed that the majority of evaluable interactions demonstrated indifferent action. Levofloxacin exhibited enhanced activity (additive or degrees of synergy) principally with piperacillin, aztreonam, or ceftazidime. The synergy and additive rate (21 to 30%) compared favorably with the enhanced interactions observed with gen-tamicin combined with piperacillin or ceftazidime (27 to 30%). Levofloxacin activity against P. aeruginosa was most comparable to that of ciprofloxacin, which was applicable against > 90% of strains found to be resistant to other classes of antimicrobial agents.     

Transferable Resistance to Specific Antibiotics in Nosocomial Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Two Teaching Hospitals

Abstract

We describe the transfer of resistance to kanamycin, carbenicillin and cephaloridine to a recipient strain of Escherichia coli K-12 No. 3110 from three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa out of 146 strains tested in 1995. The P.aeruginosa No. 201, 203, 208 donor strains were isolated from patients in the University Clinics in Frankfurt, Germany. They were resistant to most β-lac-tam antibiotics including cephalosporins of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation, imipenem, meropenem and aztreon-am. They transferred kanamycin, carbenicillin and cephaloridine resistance determinants to recipient strain E.coli K-12 3110. These determinants were accompanied in strain P.aeruginosa No. 203, with a transfer of cef-tazidime resistance determinants and in P.aeruginosa No. 208 with transfer of cefotaxime, ceftazidime and aztreon-am resistance determinants. Transfer of antibiotic resistance was also studied in 13 nosocomial strains of P.aeruginosa collected for their ceftazidime and/or imipenem resistance in a large Teaching Hospital in Ostrava, Czech Republic. Six of these strains transferred carbenicillin and/or cephaloridine resistance to the E.coli K-12 3110 recipient strain. Resistance to kanamycin and cefotaxime was also co-transferred with carbenicillin and cephaloridine determinants. Ceftazidime, imipenem or ofloxacin resistance was not transferred and is thus, most probably, of chromosomal origin.     

In vitro effect of subminimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on the biofilm formation ability of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates

The ability of A cinetobacter baumannii strains to form biofilm is one of the most important virulence factor which enables bacterial survival in a harsh environment and decreases antibiotic concentration as well. Subminimal inhibitory concentrations (subMICs) of antibiotics may change bacterial ultrastructure or have an influence on some different molecular mechanisms resulting in morphological or physiological changes in bacteria itself. The aim of this study was to determine effects of 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and 1/16 minimal inhibitory concentrationsof imipenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, azithromycin, rifampicin and colistin on biofilm formation ability of 22 biofilm non-producing and 46 biofilm producing A. baumannii strains (30 weak producing strains and 16 moderate producing strains). Results of this study indicate that 1/2–1/16 MICs of imipenem, azithromycin, and rifampicin can reduce bacterial biofilm formation ability in moderate producing strains (p < 0.05), whereas 1/16 MIC of imipenem and 1/4–1/8 MICs of rifampicin reduce the biofilm formation in weak producing strains (p < 0.05). Statisticaly significant effect was detected among biofilm non-producing strains after their exposure to 1/16 MIC of azithromycin (p = 0.039). SubMICs of ampicillin-sulbactam and colistin did not have any significant effect on biofilm formation among tested A. baumannii strains.     

Comparison of the Minimum Inhibitory,Mutant Prevention and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations of Ciprofloxacin,Levofloxacin and Garenoxacin Against Enteric Gram-negative Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens

Abstract

Acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most commonly encountered bacterial infections and management has been made more complicated in the last decade due to the trend toward increasing antimicrobial resistance to ampicillin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). Fluoroquinolones are suggested as alternative antimicrobials for the treatment of UTIs in communities for which TMP/SMX resistance is ≥10%. The mutant-prevention concentration (MPC) is a novel susceptibility parameter designed to minimize the selection of first-step resistant mutants present in large, ≥10¹⁰ CFU/mL, heterogeneous bacterial populations and is a distinct measurement from minimum inhibitory concentration testing. We measured MPC results for 80 enteric Gramnegative and 20 Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary isolates against ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and garenoxacin. Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and garenoxacin MPC results for Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa respectively were 0.5, 1, 1, 1 and 4 mg/L; 1, 2, 4, 2 and 16 mg/L; 1, 8, >8, 4 and ≥32 mg/L. By comparison, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)₉₀ results for the Enterobacteriaceae organisms ranged from ≤0.06-4 mg/L for the three drugs and 1-4 mg/L against P. aeruginosa. Similarly, MBC₉₀ results ranged from ≤0.06-4 mg/L and 2-8 mg/L respectively. For ciprofloxacin against E.coli, E. cloacae and K. pneumoniae and for levofloxacin against E.coli, C. freundii and K. pneumoniae, MPC results were below susceptible breakpoints and within clinically achievable and sustainable drug concentrations for >24 hours of the dosing interval against. For garenoxacin, urine drug concentrations are expected to be in excess of MPC results for the entire length of the dosing interval for E.coli. Application of MPCs to fluoroquinolones and management of UTIs represents a situation where high levels of in vitro activity, based on low MICs, is reflected in correspondingly low MPC values for most of the organisms tested. Incorporation of MPC strategies into current fluoroquinolone dosing in UTI represents a realistic approach for preventing the further selection of resistant organisms associated with UTIs.     

Assessment of the combination of doripenem plus a fluoroquinolone against non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from nosocomial pneumonia patients

Abstract

Carbapenem- and fluoroquinolone-non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii were obtained from four nosocomial pneumonia patients who were clinically cured following combination therapy with doripenem/levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. In vitro synergy of doripenem/levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin was evaluated using time-kill analysis. In vivo synergy was tested using a mouse lethal infection model. In time-kill studies, doripenem and levofloxacin were both bactericidal when tested at C_max; at ½C_max, the combination showed synergy up to 8 hours. Ciprofloxacin, alone or combined with doripenem, was not bactericidal. For mouse septicemia, doripenem (100 mg/kg) was ≧90% effective in preventing death in all four isolates. Levofloxacin (200 mg/kg) was 73% effective, and ciprofloxacin (35 mg/kg) was ineffective in preventing death. At lower drug concentrations, increased efficacy was observed for doripenem/levofloxacin, but not for doripenem/ciprofloxacin. Overall, the results suggest that a doripenem/levofloxacin combination may have clinical utility in treating some non-susceptible A. baumannii infections.     

Inhibitory and Bactericidal Activity of Rokitamycin against Helicobacter pylori and Morphological Alterations

Abstract

Rokitamycin is a macrolide antibiotic, recently entered into clinical use. Its in vitro activity and kill kinetics against Helicobater pylori have been evaluated at 1 x the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 2×MIC and 4×MIC at 2, 4, 8, 24 hours and compared with those of clarithromycin, erythromycin and amoxicillin. Morphological changes in H. pylori induced by rokitamycin incubation at these MICs and times were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy. All the antibiotics tested had good inhibitory activity against H. pylori, a slow growing microorganism. The order of MIC activity was clarithromycin > amoxicillin > rokitamycin > erythromycin. Rokitamycin killed more rapidly than the other antibiotics, in fact H. pylori strains were totally killed at 8 h (2×MIC) and 4 h ( 4×MIC) and after only 2h incubation all concentrations greatly decreased the CFU/ml. These effects were also confirmed by the rapid appearance of surface and morphological alterations (focal blebs, constrictions, rounded forms) in the normal structure of H. pylori observed by scanning electron microscopy. Clinical studies should be conducted to investigate the in vivo activity of rokitamycin, as an agent to be used in the combination therapies against H. pylori.     

In Vitro Activity of β-Lactam Antimicrobial Agents in Combination with Aztreonam Tested Against Metallob-β-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract

We evaluate the antimicrobial interactions between aztreonam and selected beta-lactams when tested against metallo-β-lactamase (MβL)-producing clinical strains. Ten Pseudomonsa aeruginosa strains, including nine MβL-producers (IMP- 1, -2, -13, -16, VIM-1, -2, -7, SPM-1 and GIM-1) and five Acinetobacter baumannii strains, including three MβL-producers (IMP-1 and -2) were tested using time kill/bactericidal activity methods. Aztreonam at 4, 8 and 16 mg/L was combined with four other β-lactam antimicrobials (cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam or ampicillin/sulbactam), each tested at the recognized susceptible breakpoint concentration. Enhanced activity (synergism or additive effect) was observed with four P. aeruginosa strains (IMP-16, VIM-2, SPM-1 and GIM-1 containing strains) and four A. baumannii strains, while antagonism was observed with two P. aeruginosa (IMP-16 and SPM-1-producing strains) and one A. baumannii (non-MβL) strain. All other strains showed indifferent interaction (variation of ± 1 log₁₀ CFU/ml) with any combination evaluated.     

In-vitro activities of imipenem–colistin,imipenem–tigecycline,and tigecycline–colistin combinations against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae*

The aim of the study is to determine in-vitro effects of imipenem–tigecycline, imipenem–colistin and tigecycline–colistin against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates. A total of 25 CRE isolates were included to the study. The minimum inhibition concentrations of imipenem, colistin-sulphate and tigecycline were determined with broth dilution method. Synergistic effects of imipenem–tigecycline, imipenem–colistin and tigecycline–colistin were investigated by microdilution checkerboard technique. All of the isolates were resistant to imipenem, whereas 25% of the isolates were resistant to colistin and tigecycline. Imipenem–colistin, imipenem–tigecycline and tigecycline–colistin combinations were synergistic against 40% (10/25), 24% (6/25), and 36% (9/25) of the isolates, respectively. Antagonism was observed in 8% (2/25) of the isolates in tigecycline–colistin combination. Tigecycline–colistin was the most effective (70% synergy) combination in Klebsiella spp. strains; whereas imipenem–colistin was the most effective (75% synergy) combination in Escherichia coli strains. Synergistic effect was variable and strain-depended against CRE isolates that have been tested.     

Susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical strains in China to antimicrobial combinations

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the activity levels of several combinations of antimicrobials against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. In this study, the antimicrobial susceptibility of S. maltophilia clinical isolates was determined, and the synergistic activity of three pairs of antimicrobial combinations was evaluated by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). The antimicrobial susceptibility in vitro against 83 S. maltophilia strains was greater for minocycline (80·7%) than for trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (51·8%), and levofloxacin (50·6%). The rate of resistance was highest for ticarcillin–clavulanate and ceftazidime (63·8%) and resistance to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP–SMX) was 48·2%. All three combinations were tested against susceptible isolates. Two of the combinations, TMP–SMX+ceftazidime and levofloxacin+ceftazidime were more effective than the combination of TMP–SMX+levofloxacin. We recommend acquiring more clinical data in order to explore combination therapy, which is a promising treatment of S. maltophilia infections.