In vitro activities of antimicrobial cationic peptides; melittin and nisin,alone or in combination with antibiotics against Gram-positive bacteria

Abstract

The in vitro activities of two antimicrobial cationic peptides, melittin and nisin alone and in combination with frequently used antibiotics (daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, ampicillin, and erythromycin), were assessed against clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Using the broth microdilution method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranges of melittin and nisin against all strains were 2–8 μg/ml and 2–32 μg/ml respectively. In combination studies performed with the microdilution checkerboard method using a fractional inhibitory concentration index of ?0·5 as borderline, synergistic interactions occurred more frequently with nisin–ampicillin combination against MSSA and nisin–daptomycin combination against E. faecalis strains. The results of the time-killing curve analysis demonstrated that the concentration dependent rapid bactericidal activity of nisin, and that synergism or early synergism was detected in most strains when nisin or melittin was used in combination with antibiotics even at concentrations of 0·5×MIC.     

High Rate of Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an Italian University Hospital

Summary

We reviewed our routine clinical laboratory records from January 1990 to March 1993 to evaluate the rate of oxacillin-resistance among nosocomial isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Of 265 clinically significant isolates, 174 (65%) were oxacillin-resist S. aureus (ORSA). Most of these strains were obtained from surgery patients and/or were isolated from surgical wounds. The isolations of S. aureus increased during the study period: 45 in 1990, 50 in 1991, 130 in 1992 and 40 in the first trimester of 1993. The annual rates of ORSA among S. aureus isolated varied from 62 to 68% through these years.

Most ORSA isolates proved resistant to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and rifampicin, and susceptible to vancomycin, netilmicin and cotrimoxazole. Based on these results, the need for a stringent application of infection control measures is outlined.     

Ceftaroline fosamil and treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: CAPTURE study experience

Abstract

The Clinical Assessment Program and TEFLARO Utilization Registry (CAPTURE) is a multicentre retrospective cohort study in the USA describing treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) with ceftaroline fosamil (CPT-F). Charts for review were chosen by random selection. Among 647 evaluable patients, 52% were obese, 46% had diabetes mellitus (DM), and 19% had peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was recovered in 28% and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 11%. Antibiotics were administered prior to CPT-F treatment in 80%, and concurrently in 39%. Clinical success overall was 85%; in patients with DM, 83%; with PVD, 76%; and in obese patients, 88%. Clinical success was ≧ 79% across all infection types; 81% for MRSA and 83% for MSSA; and 86% for ceftaroline monotherapy and 84% for concurrent therapy. These high clinical success rates support CPT-F as an effective treatment option for ABSSSI, including infections due to MRSA and patients with significant co-morbidities.     

Prevalence and Macrolide Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes among Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae Collected in Sofia,Bulgaria from 2001 to 2005

Abstract

A total of 328 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were analyzed to determine the rate of macrolide and penicillin resistance as well as macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes. Erythromycin resistance was found in 81 pneumococcal isolates (24.7%) and 10.7% of isolates were clindamycin resistant. The prevalence of penicillin G-intermediate (minimum inhibitory concentrations, MICs, 0.125 to 1 μg/ml) and penicillin-resistant (MICs, ≥2 μg/ml) S. pneumoniae isolates was 25.6% and 13.7%, respectively. The rate of ceftriaxone-intermediate and ceftriaxone-resistant strains was 2.7% and 1.2%, respectively. Among erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates, strains harboring mef(A) genes (n=42; 51.8%) were found to be predominant over strains with erm (B) genes (n=34; 42.0%). One (1.2%) isolate carried both erm(B) and mef(A), while 4 (4.9%) isolates carried L4 protein mutations. By using the erythromycin, clindamycin and rokitamycin triple-disk test, 42 strains were assigned to the M phenotype of macrolide resistance, 31 isolates were assigned to the partially inducible (iMcLS) phenotype, 4 were assigned to the constitutive (cMLS) phenotype. Four strains with L4 gene showed a rare phenotype with the triple-disk test. Serotyping of S. pneumoniae isolates suggested that serotype (or serogroup) 14, 6 and 19 were predominant (81.5%) among erythromycin-resistant strains. Among mef(A) positive isolates serotype 14 was predominant, among erm(B) positive isolates serogroups 6 and 19 were the most prevalent.     

New insights on the antibacterial efficacy of miconazole in vitro

Miconazole is a broad‐spectrum antifungal used in topical preparations. In the present investigation the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of miconazole for eighty wild type strains of gram‐positive and gram‐negative bacteria isolated from infected skin lesions was assessed using a modified agar dilution test (adapted to CLSI, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute). 14 ATCC reference strains served as controls. Miconazole was found efficacious against gram‐positive aerobic bacteria (n=62 species), the MICs against Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, S. spp., Streptococcus spp. und Enterococcus spp. ranged between 0.78 and 6.25 μg/mL. Interestingly, there were no differences in susceptibility between methicillin‐susceptible (MSSA, 3) methicillin‐resistant (MRSA, 6) and fusidic acid‐resistant (FRSA, 2) S. aureus isolates. Strains of Streptococcus pyogenes (A‐streptococci) (8) were found to be slightly more sensitive (0.78‐1.563 μg/mL), while for gram‐negative bacteria, no efficacy was found within the concentrations tested (MIC >200 μg/mL). In conclusion, for the gram‐positive aerobic bacteria the MICs of miconazole were found within a range which is much lower than the concentration of miconazole used in topical preparations (2%). Thus topically applied miconazole might be a therapeutic option in skin infections especially caused by gram‐positive bacteria even by those strains which are resistant to antibiotics.     

Evaluation of In Vitro Interaction of Daptomycin with Gentamicin or Beta-lactam Antibiotics Against taphylococcus aureus and Enterococci by FIC Index and Timed-Kill Curves

Abstract

The interactions of daptomycin with gentamicin and 5 β-lactam agents were determined by checkerboard and timed-kill studies. Eighty isolates were tested by checkerboard: 20 each of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (VSEF) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Time kill curves were performed on 8 selected isolates: 2 each of MRSA, MSSA, VSEF and VRE. Checkerboard results showed highest frequency of synergistic effects against VSEF (35-75%) with daptomycin combined with ceftriaxone, cefepime or imipenem; a modest effect with most combinations against VRE and MRSA (5-20%); and indifference with daptomycin and most agents against MSSA (0-5%); except with daptomycin with oxacillin where 10-20% synergy was observed.

Synergistic interaction was confirmed by time kill studies in seven of ten isolates where checkerboard suggested synergy. A bactericidal effect was exerted in 5/7 synergistic combinations.

The in vitro data suggest that daptomycin combined with other antibiotics may be microbiologically beneficial and not antagonistic.     

Environmental Staphylococcus aureus contamination in a Tunisian hospital

One hundred hospital environment samples were obtained in 2012 in a Tunisian hospital and tested for Staphylococcus aureus recovery. Antimicrobial resistance profile and virulence gene content were determined. Multilocus-sequence-typing (MLST), spa-typing, agr-typing and SmaI-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed. Two methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates typed as: ST247-t052-SCCmecI–agrI were recovered from the intensive care unit (ICU). Ten samples contained methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and these samples were collected in different services, highlighting the presence of the tst gene encoding the toxic shock syndrome toxin as well as the lukED, hla, hlb, hld and hlg_v virulence genes in some of the isolates. In conclusion, we have shown that the hospital environment could be a reservoir contributing to dissemination of virulent S. aureus and MRSA.     

mecA-positive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Zenica-Doboj Canton,Bosnia and Herzegovina

Forty-four mecA-positive and eight mecA-negative Staphylococcus aureus isolates confirmed by PCR were further tested by disc-diffusion (DD) oxacillin and cefoxitin, oxacillin Epsilon (E)-test, and oxacillin and cefoxitin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) Strip methicillin-resistant phenotype in S. aureus (MRSA) tests. Among 44 mecA-positive S. aureus isolates, two (4·5%) were detected as MRSA by DD-oxacillin, 17 (38·6%) by DD-cefoxitin test, and seven (15·9%) by the E-test. In the cefoxitin MIC Strip MRSA test, 19 (43·2%) isolates were resistant. In the oxacillin MIC Strip MRSA test, 18 (40·9%) isolates were resistant and 26 (59·1%) were sensitive, i.e. oxacillin-sensitive MRSA (OS-MRSA) (MIC range 0·25-≤0·25 mg/l). Fifteen out of 26 OS-MRSA (57·7%) belonged to spa-CC 355/595, 78% of which belonged to the largest PFGE clone. Some discrepancies between the phenotypic methods for MRSA identification obtained in this study were caused by large proportion of OS-MRSA. Misidentification of OS-MRSA as MSSA might result in an appearance of highly resistant MRSA in patients treated with beta-lactam antibiotics.     

转染外源CC10对肺腺癌细胞系A549的CyclinD1蛋白及mRNA的影响

Objective： To investigate the effects of exogenous CC10 gene transfection on cell cycle and the expression of cyclinD1 protein and mRNA in A549 cells. Methods： A549 cells in all test groups （group A to E） and control group （group F） were transfected with exogenous CC10 gene by liposome for 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 0 h respectively. CC10 protein expression was detected in A549 cells by Western blot. The growth inhibitory rate was detected by MTT method. Flow cyometry analysis （FCS） and AnnexinV-PI staining were used to determine the changes of cell cycle progression and apoptosis rate in all groups. CyclinD1 protein and mRNA expression in A549 cells was detected by the methods of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR. Results： Exogenous CC10 gene could inhibit the growth of A549 cells, and the growth inhibitory rates in all test groups （from group A to E） were 24.7%, 33.1%, 44.3%, 61.7% and 74.2% respectively, and that in group F was 6.24%. CC10 blocked the cell cycle progression at G0/G1 and induced apoptosis gradually. In A549 cells of test groups, the expression of cyclinD1 protein and mRNA was significantly decreased. Conclusion： The inhibitory effects of the transfection of exogenous CC10 gene on G0/G1 cycle of lung cancer cells might be related with the down-regulation of cyclinD1 gene.     

In vitro Activity of Ertapenem against Common Clinical Isolates in Relation to Human Pharmacokinetics

Abstract

The In vitro activity of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with moderate to severe complicated intra-abdominal, complicated skin/skin structure, acute pelvic, or complicated urinary tract infection or community acquired pneumonia was compared to ceftriaxone and piperacillintazobactam and related to known plasma concentrations of the three agents. Ertapenem was more potent against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) than ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam and was more potent and more active than both of these agents against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent against enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n=1088), Streptococcus pyogenes (n=37), Streptococcus agalactiae (n=48), MSSA (n=187), Haemophilus influenzae (n=59), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n=9) were susceptible to ertapenem; <1% of 1284 anaerobes and only 1 of 113 Streptococcus pneumoniae (a penicillin-resistant isolate) were resistant to ertapenem. The MIC value at which 90% of all Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, MSSA, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and anaerobes were inhibited (MIC₉₀) was ≤μg/ml and below the mean plasma concentration of total ertapenem following a 1 g intravenous infusion for at least 24 hours, i.e., the entire recommended dosing interval, and below the free drug concentration for at least 8 h.     

Comparative in vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents against nosocomial Gram-negative and Gram-positive clinically significant bacterial isolates from patients in a teaching hospital in Kuwait

The objective was to test the in vitro activities of ceftaroline and comparator agents against clinical isolates of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Isolates were identified with VITEK II. Susceptibility testing was with E test. A total of 1264 isolates were tested. Compared to other cephalosporins, ceftaroline demonstrated excellent in vitro activities (MIC₉₀, ≤0.5 mg/L) against Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Haemophilus influenzae. When matched with the comparator cephalosporins, ceftaroline demonstrated the greatest activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), with MIC₉₀ of 0.25 mg/L. Ceftaroline’s MIC₉₀s against both community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and hospital-acquired MRSA were 0.5 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Major discrepancies were noted between E test and disc diffusion tests for ceftaroline only against 16 Gram-negative and 16 Gram-positive isolates. Ceftaroline demonstrated an excellent in vitro activity against the majority of clinically significant Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates obtained from proven cases of bacterial infections.     

Predominance of hospital-associated MRSA among cystic fibrosis patients in a Turkish reference cystic fibrosis centre

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are the major causative agents of numerous hospital- and community-acquired infections. Increasing prevalence of MRSA in cystic fibrosis (CF) populations is reported all over the world. Although there are papers reporting the prevalence and genetic backgrounds of MRSA isolates from different settings in Turkey, there is no information regarding the situation in the CF community. This study was conducted to characterize the MRSA strains recovered from CF patients followed-up at a Turkish reference CF centre. Microbiological testing of isolates was performed via conventional microbiological techniques. Molecular characterization of MRSA isolates was carried out by SCCmec typing by multiplex PCR and PVL gene determination. Among a total of 604 CF patients included in the study, 325 patients were found to harbour S. aureus (53·8%). Of those 325 patients, 24 were positive for MRSA during their follow-up (7·4%). Thirty-two MRSA isolates from these patients were chosen for further assessment of molecular characteristics. Twenty-six MRSA isolates exhibited a pattern like SCCmec type III (81·2%) and six consecutive MRSA isolates of a single patient revealed SCCmec type IV (18·7%). Our findings definitely support the need for further surveillance studies for CF-MRSA strains and highlight the need for infection control measures in the setting of CF centres.     

RB1CC1 activates the promoter and expression of RB1 in human cancer

RB1‐inducible coiled‐coil 1 (RB1CC1, also known as FIP200) is a tumor suppressor implicated in the regulation of RB1 (retinoblastoma 1) expression. However, the molecular mechanism of RB1 regulation by RB1CC1 has not been elucidated. Here, we demonstrate that nuclear RB1CC1 binds to the RB1 promoter using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with anti‐RB1CC1 antibody. Luciferase assays with RB1 promoter reporter plasmids revealed that RB1CC1 activated the RB1 promoter through the 201 bp upstream GC‐rich region (from the initiation ATG). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay and Western blot analysis supported RB1CC1 binding to the GC‐rich region of the RB1 promoter. In addition, the C‐terminus of RB1CC1 was required for nuclear localization and subsequent RB1 promoter activation. Furthermore, the expression levels of RB1CC1 and RB1 significantly correlated with in vivo breast cancer tissues as determined by immunohistochemical analysis. These data indicate that nuclear RB1CC1 directly activates the RB1 promoter to enhance RB1 expression in cancer cells. Evaluation of RB1CC1 in various types of human cancer tissues is expected to provide useful information for clinical practice and future therapeutic strategies. © 2009 UICC     

DR. ZECKEL'S REPLY:

Abstract

The aim of the study was to monitor the prevalence of pathogens and development of resistance in bacteria isolated from bacteremic patients.

Five University Clinics and/or Regional Hospitals in the Slovak Republic participated in the study and a total of 421 isolates were collected in the second half of the year 2002. The most prevalent organisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) (19%) Staphylococcus aureus (18.3%), among Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (13.3%) Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.8%) followed by enterococci Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacter sp. All CONS and S. aureus were susceptible to vancomycin; resistance to oxacillin was observed for 55% of the CONS and only for 4% of S. aureus isolates. A higher prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin and ofloxacin was found in CONS in comparison to S. aureus. Enterococcus sp. isolates were fully susceptible to vancomycin and teicoplanin. Gentamicin, amoxicillin/ clavulanate, third generation cephalosporins and ciprofloxacin showed good activity against E. coli. Although 17% of K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, it was the most effective drug against K. pneumoniae; the prevalence of resistance to other antibiotics was rather higher. Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were the most active against Enterobacter sp. isolates and ceftazidime and meropenem against P. aeruginosa.     

Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Positive Pathogens

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of soft tissue infection, e.g. impetigo, cellulitis, or wound infection, and causes osteomyelitis, arthritis, bac-teremia with metastatic infection, and scalded skin and toxic shock syndromes. Coagulase-negative staphylococci have become increasingly important causes of nosocomial bacteremia associated with invasive monitoring, intravascular catheters and prosthetic heart valves or joints. Most staphylococci produce b-lactamase and are resistant to penicillin. An increasing proportion of S. aureus have intrinsic resistance to methicillin (MRSA) and present major problems in hospitals for the control of cross infection. The glycopeptides, teicoplanin and vancomycin, are the antibiotics of first choice for treatment of these infections.

After the first report describing a Japanese clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA), several papers have documented the emergence of these microorganisms. Since the development and spreading of this phenomenon which is perceived as a fearsome threat to the already difficult therapy of nosocomial infections due to the prevalence of heterogeneous vancomycin resistance, we found the incidence of MRSA exceeds 35% in our hospital. Out of 179 methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolated during 1997-1998, two strains (1.1%) gave subclones with vancomycin MICs of 8 mg/L. PFGE showed identical restriction patterns for both isolates, suggesting transfer of a single clone between two different patients.     

Appropriateness of Empiric Gentamicin and Vancomycin Therapy for Bacteremias in Chronic Dialysis Outpatient Units in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance

Abstract

Bacteremias in inpatient chronic HD units have been described, but there is little information on bacteremias in ambulatory HD units. To determine the frequency of bacteremia and pathogen distribution in ambulatory chronic HD units, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with 107 bacteremias in 5 chronic ambulatory HD units over a 3 year period. The object of the study was twofold. The first objective was to determine if bacteremias in ambulatory HD setting were substantially different in frequency or type than in the inpatient HD setting. Secondly, febrile patients suspected of having bacteremia in chronic HD patients are often empirically treated with vancomycin and gentamicin.

Chronic HD patients require repeated and frequent venous access for HD. Bacteremias are common in chronic HD patients and may be primary or secondary and are often related to venous access site infections. The distributions of bacteremia pathogens in chronic HD patients are predominantly reflective of skin flora, i.e., staphylococci and to lesser extent aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. After S. aureus (MSRA/MSSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS), enterococci are the next most important Gram-positive pathogens in bacteremic HD patients. Most strains of E. faecalis are sensitive to vancomycin and for practical purposes should be considered as vancomycin sensitive enterococci (VSE). In contrast, most strains of E. faecium are resistant to vancomycin and should be considered as vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE).

We retrospectively reviewed 107 patients on chronic ambulatory HD to determine the adequacy of empiric vancomycin and gentamicin prophylaxis. We found amikacin is preferred to gentamicin and that meropenem is an effective alternate substitution for gentamicin and vancomycin combination therapy.     

Oxacillin- and Mupirocin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In vitro Activity of Silver Sulphadiazine and Cerium Nitrate in Hospital Strains

Abstract

Nasal carriage is an important reservoir of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA). Mupirocin is a topical drug used to remove S. aureus from nares. However, isolates resistant to mupirocin have been reported all over the world. Silver sulphadiazine (SSD) is a topical agent, which when associated with cerium nitrate (CN), has been shown to be useful in the treatment of burn infections and could be an alternative drug for patient decolonization. Susceptibility to oxacillin in 203 S. aureus isolates was evaluated by the agar diffusion test, while the agar diffusion and agar dilution methods were used for mupirocin. A PCR-multiplex method was performed to detect the mecA and ileS-2 genes. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) to SSD and CN, used alone or in association, were determined by the agar dilution method. One hundred and sixty-three (80.3%) strains were oxacillinresistant, and 37 (18.2%) were mupirocin resistant. The MIC of SSD alone or in association with CN was 64 μg/mL, while for CN alone was 2,048 μg/mL for all isolates. SSD presented anti-staphylococcal activity at concentrations (64 μg/mL) much lower than those commonly used in commercial preparations (10 mg/g) and had good activity against mupirocin-resistant strains, showing that this drug could be used for nasal decolonization in ORSA carries.     

In vitro activity of telithromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid and comparator antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates

We have studied the prevalence of the different macrolide, lincosamide, streptograminB (MLS(B)) phenotypes among clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates erythromycin- and/or oxacillin-resistant; and also the activity of other antimicrobial agents including telithromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol and vancomycin. We found that 64.86% of S. aureus were oxacillin-resistant. While the most prevalent MLS(B) phenotype among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was constitutive MLS(B) (cMLS) (83%), among methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) it was inducible MLS(B) (iMLS(B)) (90%). Kanamycin resistance was more frequent than resistance to other aminoglycosides, being 100% for MRSA. Telithromycin was only active against iMLS(B), MS and erythromycin-susceptible isolates, although resistance rates were found among iMLS(B) MSSA (2.78%). Quinupristin/dalfopristin showed greater activity, with resistance rates of 2.5% for MRSA and 1.53% for MSSA. Both vancomycin and linezolid were fully active against all the isolates tested, with the highest MIC value being 2 microg/ml and 4 microg/ml, respectively. Among MRSA strains, 81.67% displayed resistance to five or more antimicrobials. This multiresistance was more frequently found among cMLS(B) strains (96.38% MRSA resistant to 6-9 agents).     

Telavancin activity tested against Gram-positive clinical isolates from European,Russian and Israeli hospitals (2011–2013) using a revised broth microdilution testing method: redefining the baseline activity of telavancin

Objectives: To reassess the activity of telavancin when tested against Gram-positive clinical pathogens recovered from hospitalized patients in European and adjacent regions using a revised broth microdilution method.

Methods: 11?601 consecutive, non-duplicate isolates originating from 36 institutions among 18 countries recovered between 2011 and 2013 were tested for susceptibility using a revised broth microdilution method for telavancin. Interpretive telavancin breakpoints appropriate for the method were those recently approved by the FDA and EUCAST, as available.

Results: Telavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.06?mg/l; 100.0% susceptible) was equally potent against methicillin-susceptible ((MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus. All Enterococcus faecalis was susceptible to telavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.12/0.12?mg/l) and inhibited at the susceptibility breakpoint (i.e. ≤?0.25?mg/l), except for VanA-phenotype vancomycin-resistant isolates (telavancin MIC, >1?mg/l). Telavancin (?≤?0.015/0.03?mg/l) was active against vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium, while higher MIC values were obtained for VanA strains. Telavancin (both MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, ≤?0.015?mg/l) was potent against Streptococcus pneumoniae, beta-haemolytic streptococci (MIC_50/90, ≤?0.015/0.06?mg/l) and viridans group streptococci (MIC_50/90, ≤?0.015/0.03?mg/l).

Conclusions: Telavancin exhibited potent activity against this contemporary (2011–2013) collection of organisms, inhibiting indicated pathogens at or below the FDA/EUCAST-approved breakpoints for susceptibility. VanA-phenotype enterococci were less susceptible to telavancin, a feature observed using the previous testing method. These results redefine telavancin's activity against isolates from Europe.     

Frequency of fungi in respiratory samples from Turkish cystic fibrosis patients

An increased isolation of fungi from the respiratory tract of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been reported. The prevalence of different fungi in CF patients from Turkey is not known. Our aim was to determine the frequency of fungi in the respiratory tract of Turkish CF patients. We investigated a total of 184 samples from 48 patients. Samples were inoculated on Medium B+ and CHROMagar Candida. Candida albicans was the predominant yeast isolated [30 patients (62.5%)], followed by C. parapsilosis [6 (12.5%)] and C. dubliniensis 5 (10.4%). Aspergillus fumigatus was the most common filamentous fungus [5 (10.4%)] and non‐fumigatus Aspergillus species were isolated from four (8.3%) patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently detected bacterium in C. albicans positive samples (53.57%). A. fumigatus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa or S. aureus were detected together in 75% of A. fumigatus positive samples each. No statistically significant relationship was detected between growth of yeast and moulds and age, gender, the use of inhaled corticosteroids or tobramycin. No significant correlation was found between the isolation of C. albicans, A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia or S. aureus, and the isolation of C. albicans and Haemophilus influenzae. Other factors which may be responsible for the increased isolation of fungi in CF need to be investigated.