A comparative clarithromycin bioavailability study: determination of clarithromycin and 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin under fasting and fed conditions

OBJECTIVE: To report the first comprehensive analysis of clarithromycin (CLA) and 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromcin (14R) bioequivalence metrics under both fasting and fed conditions when using a validated analytical method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In separate, single dose bioequivalence studies, fasting (n = 40) and fed (n = 18) non-smoking subjects entered a 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover trial to assess the comparative bioavailability of a 500 mg generic clarithromycin tablet (IVAX Pharmaceuticals, NJ, USA) relative to the reference product (Biaxin Filmtab, Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA). The validated assay employed an HPLC coupled to a triple stage quadrupole mass spectrometer. RESULTS: The analytics permitted plasma samples to be measured for both analytes with high precision and a lower limit ofquantitation (LLOQ) of 11 ng/ml. In both fasting and fed studies, and for both analytes, the IVAX product met the common mean geometric ratio and 90% confidence limits in order to be declared bioequivalent with Biaxin Filmtab. Furthermore, the intra-subject variabilities for the comparative AUC metrics in both studies and for both analytes were < or = 21% and < or = 26% for Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: The fasting and fed results present definitive evidence that 500 mg IVAX clarithromycin and Biaxin Filmtab are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions, whether based on CLA or 14R. Furthermore, at a 500 mg dose, clarithromycin is not a highly variable drug.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Bioequivalence study of a generic quetiapine in healthy male volunteers

Aim: To study the bioequivalence of a generic quetiapine (Quantia 200(R), manufactured by the Unison Laboratories Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) and the innovator product (Seroquel(R), AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK). Volunteers and methods: The study was a randomized, 2-way crossover design with a 2-week washout period in 24 healthy Thai male volunteers. After a single 200 mg oral dosing, serial blood samples were collected at appropriate interval up to 48 h. Plasma quetiapine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the WinNonlin(R) software with noncompartment model analysis. Comparative bioequivalence between the two formulations was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for 2-way crossover design. Results: The mean +/- SD of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 - 48 h (AUC0-48) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) of Quantia 200(R) vs. Seroquel(R) were 886.60 +/- 356.50 vs. 811.34 +/- 323.37 ng/ml; 3,754.41 +/- 1,453.00 vs. 3,420.00 +/- 1,229.6 ng x h/ml and 4,015.35 +/- 1,528.25 vs. 3,769.45 +/- 1,296.69 ng x h/ml, respectively. Time to reach Cmax (tmax) of Quantia 200(R) and Seroquel(R) were 1.08 +/- 0.778 and 1.10 +/- 0.79 h, respectively, and thus not significantly different. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of the logarithmically transformed of Cmax, AUC0-48 and AUC0-inf were 98.21 - 124.37%, 94.43 - 117.03% and 94.77 - 116.61%, respectively, which were within the acceptable range of 80 - 125%. Power of the test for Cmax, AUC0-48 and AUC0-inf was 92.1%, 96.9% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Quantia 200(R), used in this study, was bioequivalent to Seroquel(R) in terms of both the rate and extent of absorption.     

Bioequivalence study of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets in healthy subjects: moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) versus standard tablet (lactose formulation)

OBJECTIVE: A study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets, a moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) and a standard tablet (lactose formulation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical investigation was designed as a randomized, open-labeled, two-part, two-treatment, two-period crossover study, in 120 healthy male volunteers. One tablet of either formulation was administered with 200 ml of water after 10-hour overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 6 hours. Plasma harvested from blood was analyzed for limaprost by a validated LC/MS/MS method. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values and time associated with the maximal concentration (tmax) were obtained from the observed data. The elimination rate constant (lambda z) was obtained as the slope of the linear regression of the log-transformed concentration values vs. time data in the terminal phase, and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/lambda z. The area under the curve to the last measurable point (AUC0-t) was estimated by the linear trapezoidal rule. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using log-transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-A yen and Cmax and untransformed tmax, and 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t and Cmax were calculated. If the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for both AUC0-t and Cmax fell fully within the interval 80 - 125%, the bioequivalence of the two formulations was established. RESULTS: The means of AUC0-t were 0.779 vs. 0.754 pg x h/ml (test vs. reference), and the means of the Cmax were 1.26 vs. 1.12 pg/ml (test vs. reference). The geometric mean ratios of the test formulation to reference formulation for AUC0-t and Cmax were 104.0 and 112.4%, respectively, and the 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax were 100.7 - 107.4% and 105.6 - 119.6%, respectively. Both 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax fell within the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan accepted bioequivalence range of 80 - 125%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the moisture-resistant tablet was determined to be bioequivalent to the standard tablet.     

Bioequivalence study of two fluoxetine capsule formulations in healthy Middle Eastern volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of two fluoxetine hydrochloride capsule (20 mg) formulations (Fluoxicare capsule from Pharmacare Ltd., Chemicals and Cosmetics, Ramallah, Palestine, as test formulation, and Prozac from Eli Lilly Ltd., Basingstoke, UK, as reference formulation). DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted open with a randomized 2-period crossover design and a 6-week washout period. Participants were 24 healthy male volunteers aged 18-28 years, divided into 2 groups of 12 subjects. One group was given the originator drug (reference formulation), and the other was given the test formulation. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 14 time points during the interval 0-96 hours after drug administration. The concentrations of the samples were assayed spectrophotometrically at 220 nm using a Shimadzu 160 A UV-visible spectrometer. We calculated the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time of maximum plasma concentration (tmax) for each subject. Logarithmic transformation of the AUC and Cmax was used for the statistical analyses and to assess the bioavailability of the two formulations, using analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Satherwait t-tests for unequal variances. The ANOVA performed of tmax in Cmax, and in AUC provided the appropriate intra-subject variance estimates to evaluate the 90% confidence intervals for the differences between study variables after administration of the test and reference formulations. Statistical analyses were conducted on AUC 0-4 as the extrapolated part of the AUC, a truncated area approach was adapted. RESULTS: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for both of the drugs under study were as follows: Cmax = 61.24 (+/- 12.96) ng/ml for the test formulation, and for the reference formulation Cmax = 61.39 (+/- 14.1) ng/ml, the effects were statistically equivalent. The tmax for the test formulation was 8.25 (+/- 1.7) and 7.33 (+/- 0.96) for the reference formulation. The area under the curve to infinity (AUC 0-infinity (ng, day/ml)) for the test formulation and for the reference formulation were 293.02 (+/- 52.69) and 296.15 (+/- 61.69), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The two formulations had equivalent pharmacokinetic parameters, were well-tolerated, and their relative bioavailability was 98.94%.     

Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects

This study presents the results of a two-way, two-period, two-treatment crossover investigation in 12 healthy Indian male subjects to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations containing 50 mg of diacerein (CAS 13739-02-1). Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a one-week washout period. The content of diacerein in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.63% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Bioequivalence assessment of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers

A randomized, single-dose, crossover study was conducted to assess the bioavailability of two omeprazole (CAS 73590-58-6) capsule formulations, Emilok (test) and a commercially available original preparation (reference), under fasting conditions. A 20 mg dose of each formulation was administered to 36 healthy male volunteers with one-week washout period, 17 blood samples were collected over 12 h, plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by a locally validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, and omeprazole pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by the standard non-compartmental method. Mean +/- SD of Cmax, Tmax, AUC(0 --> t), AUC(0 --> infinity), and t1/2 were 0.41 +/- 0.21 and 0.48 +/- 0.27 microg/ml, 1.98 +/- 1.02 and 1.63 +/- 0.78 h, 0.95 +/- 0.78 and 1.00 +/- 0.90 microg x h/ml, 0.99 +/- 0.81 and 1.04 +/- 0.95 microg x h/ml, and 1.30 +/- 0.64 and 1.14 +/- 0.61 h for the test and reference formulations, respectively. The parametric 90% confidence intervals on mean difference between log-transformed values of the two formulations were within the acceptable bioequivalence range of 80% to 125% for AUC(0 --> t) and AUC(0 --> infinity) (88.63% to 104.98%, and 91.71% to 106.86%, respectively) but not for Cmax (76.27% to 103.63%). ANOVA revealed significant subject's effect for AUC(0 --> t), AUC(0 --> infinity), Cmax, and t1/2 with a ratio of the inter-subject to intra-subject coefficient of variation of 3.66, 3.92, 1.25, and 1.46, respectively. The results confirm the presence of marked individual variations in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and indicate that the two formulations are equivalent in relation to the extent but not the rate of absorption.     

Bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations containing rimonabant 20 mg in healthy Indian subjects

A randomized, two-treatment and two-way crossover study on twelve healthy Indian male subjects was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations containing 20 mg of rimonabant (CAS 158681-13-1). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose with a 45-day washout period between two dosing sessions. The content of rimonabant in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this investigation indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.62% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Comparative bioavailability of clarithromycin formulations in healthy brazilian volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of clarithromycin 500 mg tablets (Merck S.A Industrias Quimicas, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, used as test formulation) and Klaricid (Abbott Laboratórios do Brasil Ltda, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, used as reference formulation) in 24 healthy volunteers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with one-week interval between doses. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose, 0.33, 0.66, 1, 1.33, 1.66, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after the administration. AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal rule extrapolation method. Cmax and tmax were compiled from the plasmatic concentration-time data. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed AUC(0-inf), AUC(0-24 h), Cmax and untransformed tmax. RESULTS: Intraindividual coefficient of variation (CV%) values were 14.25% and 12.62%, respectively for Cmax and AUC(0-24 h). The geometric mean values (+/- SD) for AUC(0-24 h) (microg x h/ml), AUC(0-inf) (microg x h/ml), and Cmax (microg/ml) for test medication were 18.56 (+/- 6.87), 18.8 (+/- 5.70) and 2.45 (+/- 0.88); the obtained values for reference medication were 18.29 (+/- 5.39), 19.10 (+/- 7.21) and 2.5 (+/- 0.69). 90% Cl for clarithromycin geometric mean of AUC(0-24 h), AUC(0-inf) and Cmax ratios (test/reference) were: 93.6-105.9%, 93.8-106.2% and 89- 103.2%. CCONCLUSION The test medication was considered bioequivalent to the reference medication based on the rate and extent of absorption.     

Comparative bioavailability of two tablet formulations of fluphenazine dihydrochloride in drug-free psychiatric patients

The comparative bioavailability of a new tablet formulation of fluphenazine dihydrochloride (5 mg) and a reference product (fluphenazine dihydrochloride, Prolixin, 5 mg) was assessed in drug-free psychiatric patients. Twenty-six patients were initially entered in the study, of whom 22 completed the protocol. Each patient received the test (T) and the reference formulation (R) in a balanced two-way crossover design. Plasma concentrations of fluphenazine were monitored over a period of 48 h after drug administration using a sensitive HPLC method. One patient did not show any measurable plasma concentration for one formulation at any sampling time and, therefore, bioavailability was assessed in the remaining 21 patients. All pharmacokinetic parameters showed wide intersubject variation. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, and area under the curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUClast0), infinity (AUCinfinity0), or truncated areas (such as AUC16(0), AUC24(0) were compared by analyses of variance and found not to be significantly different in each case across the formulations. Except for AUC24(0), AUC32(0), and AUC48(0), ANOVA of all other parameters showed a high power (greater than 80%) to detect a 20% difference in the mean value of each bioequivalence parameter between T and R. The two formulations were found to be bioequivalent in that confidence intervals of the mean values of AUCinfinity0, AUClast0, truncated AUCs, or Cmax for T:R ratios were, in each case, well within the acceptable range of 100 +/- 20%.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of tiropramide in healthy volunteers

Two formulations of tiropramide ((+/-)alpha-(benzoylamino)-4-[2-(diethylamino) ethoxy]-N,N-dipropyl-benzenepropanamide hydrochloride, CAS 55837-29-1), an antispasmodic agent, were orally administered to 16 healthy volunteers by the Latin cross-over design with the purpose of evaluating bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of tiropramide. Tiropramide in human plasma was determined by a gas chromatography/nitrogen phosphorus detector. The detection limit of tiropramide was 5 ng/ml. Cmax values of test and reference formulations were 93.9 +/- 54.3 and 96.4 +/- 51.6 ng/ml, respectively. AUC0-->last and AUC0-->inf were 330.7 +/- 193.9 and 349.5 +/- 205.3 ng.h/ml, respectively, for the test formulation, 348.9 +/- 207.7 and 380.8 +/- 239.0 ng.h/ml, respectively, for the reference formulation. The terminal half-life was 2.34-2.61 h. Bioavailability differences for Cmax and AUC0-->last were -2.48% and -5.22%, respectively. Minimum detection differences were less than 20% for both Cmax and AUC0-->last. The 90% confidence limits of geometric mean values for logarithmically transformed Cmax and AUCs were within 0.8-1.25. Based on these results, the two formulations of tiropramide are considered to be bioequivalent.     

Average bioequivalence of generic clarithromycin tablets in healthy Thai male volunteers

The objective of this study was to assess bioequivalence of 500-mg clarithromycin tablets in 24 healthy volunteers. In a randomized, single dose, fasting state, two-period, crossover study design with a 1-week washout period, each subject received a 500-mg clarithromycin tablet. Plasma samples were collected over a 24-h period after administration and were analyzed by using a validated method using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. The time to reach the maximal concentration (t(max),h), the peak concentration (C(max),ng/ml) and the area under the curve (AUC(0- infinity),ng h/ml) of the Reference and Test formulations were 2.1+/-0.7 vs 2.1+/-0.7, 2474+/-702 vs 2559+/-744 and 15803+/-6120 vs 17683+/-6650, respectively. Relative bioavailability was 1.12. The 90% confidence interval (90% CI) of C(max) and AUC(0- infinity) were 95.6-110.8% and 3.5-122.0%, respectively. Bioequivalence between the test and reference preparation can be concluded.     

Single-dose and multi-dose delivery systems for intranasal fentanyl spray are bioequivalent as demonstrated in a replicate pharmacokinetic study

Background: Intranasal fentanyl spray (INFS, Instanyl?) was developed to treat cancer patients with Breakthrough Pain (BTP). INFS is delivered via a multi-dose delivery system (MDS) that is available in various dose strengths. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of INFS single dose delivery system (SDS) in relation to the currently marketed MDS device. Methods: In a randomized, single-center, single-dose, open label, comparative, four-period, two-sequence, replicate cross-over study, 48 healthy subjects (24 male and 24 female, mean age of 28.1 years, mean bodyweight 69.8 kg) received 200 μg/100 μl fentanyl administered via SDS and via MDS in one of two alternating treatment sequences. Naltrexone was given to all subjects to prevent potential fentanyl adverse drug reactions. Blood samples were frequently taken up to 72 hours post INFS administration and analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). Statistical analyses of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were performed using a linear mixed effect model applied to the natural log-transformed data. Results: Healthy subjects showed very similar plasma concentration over time profiles for both delivery systems. The mean fentanyl Cmax and AUC0-∞ values for SDS and MDS were 948 pg/ml, 949 pg/ml and 4,439 pg×h/ml, 4,489 pg×h/ml. respectively. Point estimates (and 90% confidence intervals) for AUC and Cmax were 0.97 (0.93 - 1.02) and 1.00 (0.92 - 1.09) and therefore in the bioequivalence range of 0.80 - 1.25. Conclusions: Results of this study show that SDS and MDS met the pre-defined regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Safety profiles were consistent between both devices and no safety concerns were identified with INFS administered in combination with oral naltrexone.     

Bioequivalence study of fluoxetine hydrochloride in healthy volunteers

Fluoxetine hydrochloride (CAS 59333-67-4) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) widely used as antidepressant drug. The aim of the present trial was to assess the bioequivalence of a new formulation of the drug (test formulation) as compared to a reference product from the Swiss market. Both drugs were available as 20 mg dispersible tablets. The trial was performed according to a two-period, two-sequence, balanced, randomised, single-dose design with a wash-out phase of at least 56 days. The two formulations were tested in 30 male healthy volunteers. A specific highly sensitive bioassay in tandem mass spectrometry allowed to set the limit of quantification to 100 pg/ml for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Average t(max) was 5.4 h for fluoxetine and 71-80 h for norfluoxetine. The peak concentration was on average 14 ng/ml for fluoxetine and 10.5 ng/ml for norfluoxetine. Half-life was on average 48-50 h for fluoxetine and 130-138 h for norfluoxetine. AUC infinity for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were on average 790 and 2800 ng x ml(-1) x h, respectively. All these figures demonstrate that plasma concentration-time profiles of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are quite different. Applied statistical tests, suggested by operating guidelines, demonstrated bioequivalence of the test formulation and the reference formulation. The conclusion on bioequivalence was based on both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine results. 90 % confidence Intervals for Cmax, AUCt and AUC infinity (fluoxetine and norfluoxetine) were within the acceptance range (0.80-1.25) and t(max), processed with a non-parametric test, did not show any statistically significant difference between test and reference formulation. Safety and tolerability proved to be similarly good with both test and reference formulation. In conclusion, the present trial has demonstrated bioequivalence of the test and the reference formulation, both consisting of fluoxetine hydrochloride dispersible tablets.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Bioequivalence study of levothyroxine tablets compared to reference tablets and an oral solution

The study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of three levothyroxine sodium (CAS 51-48-9) formulations, i.e. a test and a reference tablet and an oral solution. A bioequivalence study was carried out in 25 healthy volunteers, who were administered a single dose of 600 microg levothyroxine in the form of the test formulation (levothyroxine sodium tablets 200 microg; Eferox), the originator product, and an oral solution. The trial was performed in one study center according to an open, randomized, three-way cross-over design with wash-out periods of 35 days between administration. Blood samples were taken up to 48 h post dose, the plasma was separated and the concentrations of levothyroxine and triiodothyronine were determined by radioimmunoassay with I125 labeling method. The levothyroxine mean Cmax were 112.0+/-17.3 ng/ml, 113.4+/-18.5 ng/ ml and 111.3+/-15.1 ng/ml, while the mean AUC0-24 were 2263.7+/-332.8 ng x h/ ml, 2307.3+/-351.3 ng x h/ml and 2286.1+/-331.0 ng x h/ml for the test and reference tablets as well as for the oral solution, respectively. No significant differences were found of principal pharmacokinetic parameters between the studied formulations. The 90%-confidence interval for the primary target parameters, intra-individual ratios of AUC0-24 and Cmax of levothyroxine were within the acceptance ranges for bioequivalence trials, i.e. AUC0-24 0.954-1.016 and 0.966-1.011 as well as Cmax 0.948-1.027 and 0.968-1.032 for test tablets versus reference tablets and the oral solution, respectively. Similar results were observed for triiodothyronine. In the light of the present study it can be concluded that the levothyroxine test tablet is bioequivalent to the reference formulation in respect of extent and rate of absorption. The results of the present trial confirm the findings of a previous study, performed under steady-state conditions with Eferox tablets 100 microg in patients without thyroid function.     

The relative bioavailability study and fasting and fed states pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to comply with regulatory criteria for marketing of the test product in China. This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male volunteers and consisted of separate fasting and fed phases. A single oral dose of the test or reference formulation was followed by a 6-week washout period, after which subjects received the alternative formulation. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72, 144, 288, 432 and 576?h after dosing. Plasma samples were separated and assayed for bicalutamide using a selective and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The fasting and fed states pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-576?h, AUC0-∞, Cmax, tmax and t1/2 were determined from plasma concentration-time profile of both formulations. The formulations were considered bioequivalent when the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (test:reference) for Cmax and AUC0-576?h were within the regulatory range of 80-125%. There were no significant increases in bicalutamide Cmax, AUC0-576?h or tmax for either formulation in the fed phase compared with the fasting phase. In both the fasting and fed portions of the study, the 90% CIs for the ratio (test:reference) of log-transformed Cmax and AUC0-576?h were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence testing of generic fluconazole preparations in healthy thai volunteers

AIM: To determine the bioequivalence of two oral formulations of generic fluconazole in twelve healthy Thai volunteers. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test preparation was Flucozole (Siam Bheasach, Thailand) and the reference was Diflucan (Pfizer Inc.). The two products were administered as 200 mg single oral doses in a two-period crossover design with a two-week washout period. After drug administration, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 72 hours. Serum fluconazole concentrations were determined by HPLC, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: The time to reach the maximal concentration (Tmax, hour) of Flucozole (1.18 +/- 0.56) was statistically faster than that of Diflulan (1.59 +/- 0.54). The 90% confidence intervals of the AUC(0 - infinity) ratio and the Cmax, ratio muT/muR for Flucozole/Diflucan were 0.97 - 1.20 and 1.01 - 1.26, respectively. These values were within the acceptable bioequivalence intervals of 0.80 - 1.25 and 0.7 - 1.43 for the ratio of the average AUC(0 - infinity) and Cmax, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thus, our study demonstrated the bioequivalence of Flucozole and Diflucan with respect to the rate (Cmax) and extent of absorption (AUC(0 - infinity).     

盐酸二甲双胍片在中国健康人体的生物等效性

目的评价2种国产盐酸二甲双胍片(口服降糖药)在中国健康人体的生物等效性。方法 20名健康男性受试者随机交叉单剂量口服盐酸二甲双胍片试验药物和对照药物,各1.0 g。用高效液相色谱法测定血浆中盐酸二甲双胍的浓度,用DAS 2.0软件计算药代动力学参数,并对2种药物进行生物等效性评价。结果试验药物和对照药物的主要药代动力学参数如下:Cmax为(2.83±0.53),(2.57±0.57)mg.L-1;Tmax为(1.55±0.39),(1.63±0.36)h;t1/2为(3.70±1.76),(3.36±0.72)h;AUC0-24为(10.20±1.95),(9.71±2.56)mg.h.L-1。AUC0-24、AUC0-∞、Cmax的90%可信区间分别为99.1%～114.6%、99.1%～113.8%和100.6%～110.4%。试验药物相对于对照药物的生物利用度F为(108.3±20.5)%。结论试验药物和对照药物生物等效。     

Determination of azithromycin in human plasma by LC-MS-MS and its pharmacokinetics

A LC-MS-MS assay has been developed for determinating of azithromycin in human plasma and investigating the pharmacokinetics in Chinese male volunteers following oral administration of a single dose of the capsules (0.5 g). Plasma samples were deproteinated by methanol and a liquid chromatographic-mass-mass spectrometric assay was developed for the determination of azithromycin in human plasma. Assay linearity was obtained in the range of 3.048-1016 microg x L(-1) (r = 0.9995). The recovery of azithromycin from human plasma was more than 90%. The intra- and inter-day precision for four different concentration examined were lower than 15%. Its main pharmacokinetic parameters of AUC(0-144), AUC(0- infinity), Cmax, Tmax, T1/2 and MRT were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with the reported values. AUC(0-144), Tmax and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA. The test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference formulation and there was no significant difference of Tmax between the test formulation and reference formulation.