Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of reactive arthritis (Reiter's syndrome). A department of veterans affairs cooperative study

Objective. To determine whether sulfasalazine (SSZ) at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is effective in the treatment of reactive arthritis (ReA) that has been unresponsive to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. Methods. One hundred thirty-four patients with ReA who had failed to respond to NSAIDs were recruited from 19 clinics, randomized (double-blind) to receive either SSZ or placebo, and followed up for 36 weeks. The definition of treatment response was based on joint pain/tenderness and swelling scores and physician and patient global assessments. Results. Longitudinal analysis revealed improvement in the patients taking SSZ compared with those taking placebo, which appeared at 4 weeks and continued through the trial (P = 0.02). At the end of treatment, response rates were 62.3% for SSZ treatment compared with 47.7% for placebo treatment. The Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate declined more with SSZ treatment than with placebo (P < 0.0001). Adverse reactions were fewer than expected and were mainly due to nonspecific gastrointestinal complaints. Conclusion. SSZ at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is well tolerated and effective in patients with chronically active ReA.     

Reactive arthritis after an outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 infection

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence and clinical characteristics of reactive arthritis (ReA) after an outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 infection. METHODS: From 15 October to 6 November 1998, a widespread outbreak of Y pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 occurred in Finland. A questionnaire on musculoskeletal symptoms was mailed to 38 patients with infection confirmed by culture. All patients who reported joint symptoms were interviewed by phone and their medical records of outpatient visits or hospital admission because of recent joint symptoms were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty three of 38 (87%) patients returned the questionnaire. Reactive musculoskeletal symptoms were reported by 5/33 (15%): four patients (12%) fulfilled the criteria for ReA and one additional patient had reactive enthesopathy. The patients with ReA were adults (age range 40-47 years), whereas the patient with reactive enthesopathy was a 14 year old boy. In all patients with ReA, the arthritis was polyarticular. In addition to peripheral arthritis, other musculoskeletal symptoms included sacroiliitis (one patient), pain in Achilles tendon (one patient), and heel pain (two patients). HLA-B27 was positive in all the three patients tested. In three of four patients with ReA, the duration of acute arthritis was over six months. CONCLUSION: Y pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 infection is frequently associated with ReA and the clinical picture is severe.     

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of three-month treatment with the combination of ofloxacin and roxithromycin in recent-onset reactive arthritis

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 56 patients with recent-onset ReA [enteroarthritis, n = 47 (84 %); uroarthritis, n = 9 (16 %)] were randomly assigned to receive 200 mg ofloxacin and 150 mg roxithromycin twice daily (Combi, n = 26) or placebo (n = 30) for 3 months. Patients were assessed at entry, at 2 weeks, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was recovery from arthritis at 6 months, and secondary outcome measures were swollen and tender joint counts, Ritchie index, serum CRP level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and joint pain on a visual analogue scale at 6 months. After 6 months, 20 patients [77 % (95 % CI 56–91)] in Combi and 20 patients [67 % (95 % CI 47–83)] in placebo group had recovered from arthritis (p = 0.55), and all clinical and laboratory variables showed improvement with no statistically significant difference between groups. Adverse events were reported by 62 % of the patients in the Combi versus 40 % in the placebo group. In conclusion, outcome of ReA was good in both treatment groups. Three-month treatment with the combination of ofloxacin and roxithromycin had no advantage over placebo in patients with recent-onset ReA.     

Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral articular manifestations of the seronegative spondylarthropathies: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the peripheral articular manifestations of the seronegative spondylarthropathies (SNSA) respond differently than the axial manifestations to treatment with sulfasalazine (SSZ). METHODS: This is a reanalysis of a previously reported series of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials comparing the effects of SSZ, 2,000 mg/day, and placebo on the axial and peripheral articular manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and reactive arthritis (ReA; Reiter's syndrome). Patients were classified as treatment responders on the basis of meeting predefined improvement criteria in 4 outcome measures: namely, patient and physician global assessments in all patients, morning stiffness and back pain in patients with axial manifestations, and joint pain/tenderness scores and joint swelling scores in patients with peripheral articular manifestations. RESULTS: Six hundred nineteen SNSA patients (264 AS, 221 PsA, and 134 ReA) were studied. One hundred eighty-seven of these patients had only axial manifestations of their disease, while 432 patients had peripheral articular manifestations. Of the patients with axial disease, 40.2% of the SSZ group and 43.3% of the placebo group met the predefined response criteria (P = 0.67). Of the peripheral articular group, 59.0% of the SSZ-treated patients and 42.7% of the placebo-treated patients showed a response (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSION: In a large group of affected individuals, the response of SNSA patients to SSZ appears to be related to the articular manifestations of their disease. These data demonstrate that the axial and peripheral articular manifestations of SNSA respond differently to treatment with SSZ. In SNSA patients with persistently active peripheral arthritis, SSZ is safe, well tolerated, and effective.     

Antibiotic treatment and long term prognosis of reactive arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a three month course of lymecycline has an effect on the long term prognosis of reactive arthritis (ReA). METHODS: In 1987-88 a double-blind controlled study with three month course of lymecycline/placebo was conducted. 17 of 23 patients treated at the outpatient department of Helsinki University Central Hospital volunteered to take part in a follow up study, where a physical examination were performed, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, and radiographs of the lumbosacral spine and sacroiliac joints and of symptomatic peripheral joints were examined. RESULTS: 16/17 (94%) patients reported some kind of back pain and 10/17 (59%) peripheral joint symptoms during the follow up. Two patients had unilateral grade 1 sacroiliitis, one patient grade 4 sacroiliitis, and one patient bilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis. In one patient the disease had progressed to ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and in another to chronic spondyloarthropathy. In addition, two patients had small erosions in radiocarpal joints. No statistically significant differences were found between placebo and lymecycline groups in the development of chronic arthritis, sacroiliitis, or AS. CONCLUSION: The results of the initial study showed that long term treatment with lymecycline in patients with acute ReA decreased the duration of arthritis in those with Chlamydia trachomatis triggered ReA, but not in other patients with ReA. Ten years after the acute arthritis one patient had developed AS, and three had radiological sacroiliitis, three patients had radiological changes at peripheral joints. Long term lymecycline treatment did not change the natural history of the disease.     

Psoriasis predicts a poor short-term outcome in patients with spondylarthropathy.

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of patients with recent-onset spondylarthropathy (SpA) is unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to prospectively correlate clinical and laboratory features with functional and radiologic outcome in patients with psoriatic SpA (PsS), undifferentiated SpA (uSpA), and Reiter's syndrome/reactive arthritis (ReA). METHODS: Patients presenting to an early arthritis clinic with a spondylarthropathy pattern of peripheral arthritis were selected and prospectively followed. Clinical and laboratory features were recorded at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Radiographs of affected joints were taken at presentation and at followup. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 157 patients: 82 PsS, 59 uSpA, and 16 ReA. Symptom duration at presentation was progressively shorter, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate/C-reactive protein (ESR/CRP) incrementally higher in ReA, uSpA, and PsS, respectively. There was a higher swollen joint count (SJC) in PsS compared with uSpA. In PsS, strong positive correlations were observed between ESR/CRP and articular indices. Initially, functional impairment was greater in ReA compared with uSpA and PsS but resolved completely in ReA. Clinical remission rates at 2 years were ReA 61% and uSpA 63%, compared with PsS 14%. Remission at 2 years could be predicted in SpA by disease category and presentation SJC. Baseline erosions in PsS (28%) and uSpA (5%) increased to 45% and 25%, respectively, at 2 years. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest a spectrum within the spondylarthropathy subgroups where at presentation the acute phase markers in ReA and uSpA reflect a systemic process, whereas in PsS they reflect articular manifestations. Although the clinical presentations are indistinguishable, PsS has a more aggressive clinical course with a poorer functional and radiologic outcome.     

依那西普治疗中国接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的活动性类风湿关节炎患者随机双盲多中心对照研究

目的 研究依那西普每周1次皮下注射50 mg对接受甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗的中国活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效及安全性.方法 本研究由2部分组成:12周双盲治疗阶段和12周安全性开放研究阶段.双盲期间的随机通过临床操作随机化(CORE)系统完成.在双盲阶段,RA患者被随机分配到依那西普50mg治疗组或安慰剂组,每周1次皮下注射给药,同时坚持一定剂量MTX给药.完成双盲治疗的RA患者在开放治疗中均接受每周1次依那西普50 mg和MTX给药.以美国风湿病学会(ACR)疗效评价指标ACR 20为主要终点疗效指标.次要终点疗效指标包括医生和患者总体评价、晨僵持续时间、疼痛目视模拟测试表(VAS)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、C反应蛋白(CRP)值、疼痛和肿胀关节数.并且比较2组的安全性结果.采用Fisher精确概率法对主要终点疗效指标第12周ACR 20应答情况及其他次要终点疗效指标进行分析.使用协方差方法分析连续终点相对于基线的变化.结果 双盲治疗期间修正的意向性治疗人群(Mitt)共有156例患者,其中依那西普+MTX组77例.安慰剂+MTX组79例,149例患者完成双盲阶段的治疗.治疗4周时,依那西普+MTX组ACR 20有效率为39%(30/77),安慰剂+MTX组为16%(13/79),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);12周时,依那西普+MTX组ACR 20有效率为62%(48/77),安慰剂+MTX组为23%(18/79),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).其他疗效指标包括医生和患者总体评价、晨僵持续时间、疼痛VAS、HAQ、CRP、触痛关节数、肿胀关节数等均从第4周开始,在依那西普+MTX组明显优于安慰剂+MTX组(P<0.01).总的不良反应发生率在2组间差异无统计学意义.结论 与安慰剂治疗活动性RA相比.依那西普治疗活动性RA起效迅速、疗效显著.依那西普50 mg+MTX每周1次给药治疗中国成年活动性RA患者24周,耐受性良好.     

Patient-reported outcomes better discriminate active treatment from placebo in randomized controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have used patient- and physician-reported outcomes, ESR and/or CRP as components of ACR response criteria to assess efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Mean changes from baseline in patient- and physician-reported outcome measures, ESR and CRP were compared in two RCTs in patients with active RA. Comparisons between active and placebo treatment used mean percentage improvements and standard effect sizes (SESs). RESULTS: In both protocols, patient-reported assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function reflected little or no improvement with placebo, best discriminating between active and placebo therapy, as did ESR and CRP. CONCLUSION: Improvements in signs and symptoms of active RA in placebo RCTs appear to be best reflected by patient-reported measures of physical function, as long as reported changes in global assessments of disease activity and/or pain reflect similar benefit. Patient-reported outcome measures should be considered objective; treatment-associated changes are congruent with measures of inflammation, and appear less susceptible to the placebo response.     

Dose response and safety study of meloxicam up to 22.5 mg daily in rheumatoid arthritis: a 12 week multicenter, double blind, dose response study versus placebo and diclofenac

OBJECTIVE: This Phase III, placebo and active controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg daily for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A 12 week, randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel group trial compared daily oral meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg to placebo (negative control) and diclofenac 75 mg BID (positive control). A total of 894 patients (18 years of age with confirmed RA who flared following an NSAID-free period) were randomized to be treated. Baseline scores for all endpoints were similar among the treatment groups. Patient assessments were at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks or early termination. RESULTS: All treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.001). Meloxicam 7.5 and 22.5 mg was significantly superior to placebo in all 5 primary efficacy endpoints (swollen joint count, tender joint count, patient pain, patient and physician global; all p < 0.05). Diclofenac 150 mg was superior to placebo for 4 of 5 primary efficacy measures (all but swollen joint count; p < 0.05) and meloxicam 15 mg was superior for 3 of 5 primary endpoints (patient pain and patient and physician global). AUC of patient global, patient pain, and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire demonstrated dose-response (p < 0.04), while AUC ACR20 showed a qualitative trend in the same direction. The rate of gastrointestinal (GI) events during the 12 week trial for all doses of meloxicam and diclofenac did not differ significantly from placebo (23.2-32.0%). GI withdrawals were comparable and not significantly different across all treatment groups (4.3-5.7%). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated a dose response relationship for meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg using AUC measurement of response for the treatment of RA. All 3 doses of meloxicam. and positive control, were effective in the treatment of RA. The overall incidence rate of GI events did not differ significantly from placebo in either the meloxicam treatment groups or the positive control.     

Decreased pain and synovial inflammation after etanercept therapy in patients with reactive and undifferentiated arthritis: an open-label trial

OBJECTIVE: Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) have been identified in the synovium of patients with reactive and undifferentiated arthritis, implicating TNFalpha in the pathogenesis of these disorders. This finding has provided a rationale for the use of TNFalpha antagonists in the treatment of reactive arthritis; however, the possibility that the triggering microorganism might persist in affected joints and become activated with use of these agents has been of concern. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of etanercept (25 mg subcutaneous twice weekly) in 16 patients with undifferentiated or reactive arthritis was assessed in a 6-month open-label trial. Synovial biopsies were performed before and after treatment with etanercept. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed on the synovial biopsy samples to evaluate for the presence of nucleic acid material of bacterial organisms. Outcome measures including tender and swollen joint counts, pain assessment on a 10-point visual analog scale, and functional ability as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire were determined before and after etanercept therapy. RESULTS: Ten of 16 patients completed the trial. Six patients withdrew, but none had a worsening of arthritis or infection. Of the 10 completers, 9 could be classified as treatment responders, despite the evidence of bacterial organisms on PCR analysis prior to initiating etanercept in 3 patients; 2 patients became PCR negative on etanercept. Five of 6 patients with adequate synovial biopsy specimens showed improvement, but not normalization of histology. CONCLUSION: Etanercept was well-tolerated without clinical exacerbation of any suspected underlying infections and appeared to provide therapeutic benefit in our cohort of patients with reactive and undifferentiated arthritis.     

Adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis for the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis: an open pilot multicentre trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GCAP) in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active and refractory RA were treated with weekly GCAP sessions using a column filled with acetate beads (Adacolumn) over five consecutive weeks. Clinical assessments and response to therapy were analysed at weeks 5, 7, 12 and 20 in an open multicentre trial. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 20. EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response criteria, based on the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) and disability using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 27 patients, 81.5% were women with mean disease duration of 14.4 yr. The mean number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was 3.7, and 48.1% of patients had previously failed on biologicals. On an intention-to-treat basis, 40.7% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 44.4% a therapeutic EULAR response at week 20. These percentages were 50 and 54.5% in 22 patients who completed the trial. In the 10 completers who had previously failed on biologicals, an ACR response was achieved in four patients (ACR20, two; ACR50, one; ACR70, one). A significant decrease was recorded in different ACR response components, including the tender joint and swollen joint counts, pain score and patient and physician global disease assessments, as well as the DAS28 index; most of them improved after week 5. ESR and CRP, but not the HAQ score, had decreased significantly at week 20. The treatment was well tolerated and only one serious adverse event related to the study procedure was documented (sepsis due to a catheter infection). CONCLUSIONS: GCAP treatment led to significant clinical improvement in a subset of patients with RA who had failed to respond to DMARDs or biologicals. Further large, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to fully assess the therapeutic value of GCAP for refractory RA.     

Ciprofloxacin treatment does not influence course or relapse rate of reactive arthritis and anterior uveitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of reactive arthritis (ReA) and anterior uveitis (AU) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Seventy-two patients participated in this study, 56 with ReA and 42 with AU (26 patients had both ReA and AU). Ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice a day) was administered for 12 months with a 12-month followup. End points of the study included time to disease relapse and measures of disease severity. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in time to disease relapse, joint inflammation, number of joints and enthesis involved in patients with ReA, or signs and symptoms of AU. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment of ReA and AU with ciprofloxacin made no statistically significant difference to the natural history of these diseases or their severity.     

Clinical presentations of chlamydial and non-chlamydial reactive arthritis

The aim of this study was to investigate the triggering micro-organisms and the clinical as well as laboratory differences between Chlamydial and non-chlamydial reactive arthritis (ReA) in a prospective study on 98 patients with acute/subacute arthritis. An inciting organism was found in 42 patients. Eighteen of these were chlamydial. Fifty-seven percent of all ReA patients were carriers for HLA-B27, which increased to 67% in the chlamydial group. Chlamydial ReA patients had more urethritis (P<0.05) with a longer period between arthritis and inciting infection, significantly lower CRP levels, and involved joint counts (P<0.05). Additionally, sacroiliitis was more frequent besides extra-articular manifestations in chlamydial ReA group. This study shows that chlamydial ReA differs in some points from non-chlamydial ReA, which in turn may affect the evaluation of an arthritic patient. ReA due to chlamydia more frequently encompasses a monoarticular or oligoarticular clinical picture with predominant distal extremity involvement. Non-chlamydial ReA presents higher joint counts and may involve upper extremity joints.     

Randomised, blinded, placebo controlled trial of doxycycline for chronic seronegative arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether long term doxycycline improves symptoms in patients with chronic seronegative or reactive arthritis. METHODS: A randomised, triple blind, controlled clinical trial of three months' treatment with doxycycline or placebo of patients with chronic reactive or seronegative arthritis was conducted. The primary study end points were three month pain and functional status measured by a self administered Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales version 2 (AIMS2) quality of life questionnaire. Secondary end points were pain and functional status at 6-12 months, three month rheumatologist assessed joint count, pain, and arthritis activity, and treatment efficacy in those with previous exposure to chlamydia. RESULTS: Of 60 patients randomly allocated to receive doxycycline or placebo, results from 37 were evaluable at three months. Groups were well balanced for major prognostic variables. Doxycycline had no detectable effect at three months on pain change scores (mean difference 1.5, 95% CI -1.2 to 4.2, p=0.25) or composite functional change scores (mean difference 0.8, 95% CI -5.6 to 7.1, p=0.81). Furthermore, there were no differences in secondary study end points, and no apparent treatment effect in patients with previous chlamydia infection. CONCLUSION: Three months' treatment with doxycycline did not improve pain or functional status in patients with chronic reactive or seronegative arthritis.     

Combination antibiotics as a treatment for chronic Chlamydia‐induced reactive arthritis: A double‐blind,placebo‐controlled,prospective trial

Objective

Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae are known triggers of reactive arthritis (ReA) and exist in a persistent metabolically active infection state in the synovium, suggesting that they may be susceptible to antimicrobial agents. The goal of this study was to investigate whether a 6‐month course of combination antibiotics is an effective treatment for patients with chronic Chlamydia‐induced ReA.

Methods

This study was a 9‐month, prospective, double‐blind, triple‐placebo trial assessing a 6‐month course of combination antibiotics as a treatment for Chlamydia‐induced ReA. Eligible patients had to be positive for C trachomatis or C pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Groups received 1) doxycycline and rifampin plus placebo instead of azithromycin; 2) azithromycin and rifampin plus placebo instead of doxycycline; or 3) placebos instead of azithromycin, doxycycline, and rifampin. The primary end point was the number of patients who improved by 20% or more in at least 4 of 6 variables without worsening in any 1 variable in both combination antibiotic groups combined and in the placebo group at month 6 compared with baseline.

Results

The primary end point was achieved in 17 of 27 patients (63%) receiving combination antibiotics and in 3 of 15 patients (20%) receiving placebo. Secondary efficacy end points showed similar results. Six of 27 patients (22%) randomized to combination antibiotics believed that their disease went into complete remission during the trial, whereas no patient in the placebo arm achieved remission. Significantly more patients in the active treatment group became negative for C trachomatis or C pneumoniae by PCR at month 6. Adverse events were mild, with no significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion

These data suggest that a 6‐month course of combination antibiotics is an effective treatment for chronic Chlamydia‐induced ReA.

     

The effects of interferon beta treatment on arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether interferon beta (IFN-beta) therapy might have a beneficial effect on arthritis, we evaluated the effect of IFN-beta on collagen type II-induced arthritis (CIA) in rhesus monkeys and conducted a pilot study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Four rhesus monkeys with CIA were treated with 10 x 10(6) U (MIU)/kg mammalian cell-derived recombinant IFN-beta (Rebif; Ares-Serono) s.c. daily for 1 week. Subsequently, 12 patients with active RA were treated for 12 weeks with purified natural fibroblast IFN-beta (Frone, Ares-Serono) s.c. 3 times weekly at the following dosages: 6 MIU (n = 4), 12 MIU (n = 4) and 18 MIU (n = 4). RESULTS: Rapid clinical improvement during IFN-beta therapy was observed in three of the four rhesus monkeys with CIA. There was also a marked decrease in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels with a subsequent increase after discontinuation of the treatment in all monkeys. The 10 RA patients who completed the study exhibited on average gradual improvement of tender and swollen joint counts, patient's assessment of pain, and patient's and doctor's global assessment (all P < 0.05). The health assessment questionnaire and serum CRP levels also tended to decrease, but this was not statistically significant; 40% of the patients fulfilled the ACR criteria for 20%, improvement, whereas none fulfilled the ACR criteria for 50% improvement 12 weeks after initiation of treatment. There was no clear dose response relationship. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that IFN-beta treatment has a beneficial effect on arthritis.     

A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial of combination therapy with methotrexate plus ciclosporin in patients with active psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding ciclosporin A (CSA) to the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) demonstrating an incomplete response to methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy. METHODS: In a 12 month, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial at five centres in three countries, 72 patients with active PsA with an incomplete response to MTX were randomised to receive either CSA (n = 38) or placebo (n = 34). Patients underwent full clinical and radiological assessment and, in addition, high resolution ultrasound (HRUS) was performed at one centre. An intention to treat (last observation carried forward) analysis was employed. RESULTS: Some significant improvements were noted at 12 months in both groups. However, in the active but not the placebo arm there were significant improvements in swollen joint count, mean (SD), from 11.7 (9.7) to 6.7 (6.5) (p<0.001) and C reactive protein, from 17.4 (14.5) to 12.7 (14.3) mg/l (p<0.05) as compared with baseline. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score improved in the active group (2 (2.3) to 0.8 (1.3)) as compared with placebo (2.2 (2.7) to 1.9 (2.8)), p<0.001, and synovitis detected by HRUS (33 patients, 285 joints) was reduced by 33% in the active group compared with 6% in the placebo group (p<0.05). No improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire or pain scores was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Synovitis detected by HRUS was significantly reduced. Combining CSA and MTX treatment in patients with active PsA, and a partial response to MTX, significantly improves the signs of inflammation but not pain or quality of life.     

Human immunodeficiency virus related reactive arthritis in Zambia

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical, radiological, and diagnostic features of reactive arthritis (ReA) in indigenous Black Zambians with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. METHODS: Consecutive patients attending an arthritis clinic over a 5-year period were studied prospectively. Those who satisfied diagnostic criteria for ReA were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 170 patients satisfied the ESSG criteria for ReA; 71 (45 men, 26 women) had one or more extraarticular manifestations; 30% had enteroreactive and 14% uroreactive disease. Only 59% of patients had the diagnostic features of ReA at presentation. The initial diagnosis was undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (uSpa) in 20%, other ReA in 14%, and "arthritis alone" in 7%. Of 65 (42 men, 23 women) patients tested, 94% were HIV-positive (91% men, 100% women). In those with HIV, the arthritis was predominantly polyarticular, lower limb-predominant, and progressive; 58% of 33 with persistent disease had erosions of foot and/or hand joints (average disease duration, 24.4 mo); 6 of 10 showed early radiological spine or sacroiliac joint changes (average duration 47.7 mo). Anterior uveitis occurred in 33% of patients, while keratoderma blenorrhagicum and stomatitis occurred in 14.3% and 9.5%, respectively, of patients with enteroreactive ReA. Uroreactive ReA was more common in women. There were no significant differences in the clinical, diagnostic, or radiographic features between men and women or between those with or without a known preceding trigger. CONCLUSION: HIV associated ReA in Black Zambians frequently follows an accelerated course with a strong tendency to relapse, develop early erosions and joint deformity, and become chronic. The clinical, diagnostic, and radiographic features are indistinguishable from those described in the conventional (HLA-B27 related) disease, although our HIV-positive patients have a high overall frequency of uveitis, keratoderma, and onycholysis.     

Effect of a three month course of ciprofloxacin on the late prognosis of reactive arthritis

BACKGROUND: The value of antibiotics in the treatment of reactive arthritis (ReA) is still controversial. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the long term outcome of patients with ReA, treated with a three month course of ciprofloxacin or placebo. METHODS: Patients who had had ReA and had participated in a double blind, placebo controlled trial on the effectiveness of ciprofloxacin 4-7 years earlier were invited to a clinical examination. Of the 71 patients who were included in the original study, 53 agreed to visit the clinic for an examination. Twenty six of 53 patients had originally received ciprofloxacin and 27 had belonged to the placebo group. Of these, 20 in the ciprofloxacin and 25 in the placebo group were HLA-B27 positive. RESULTS: 11/27 (41%) patients in the original placebo group had now developed chronic rheumatic disease, as compared with only 2/26 (8%) patients originally treated with ciprofloxacin (p=0.006). Two patients who originally had received placebo, none in the ciprofloxacin group had developed ankylosing spondylitis, and three patients in the original placebo group, none in the ciprofloxacin group had recurrent anterior uveitis. The same tendency was seen when several different measures were analysed. Of the patients with chronic spondyloarthropathy, 10 in the placebo and none in the ciprofloxacin group were HLA-B27 positive. CONCLUSION: Analysis 4-7 years after the initial ReA suggests that a three month course of antibiotics in the acute phase may have a beneficial effect on the long term prognosis.     

Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on anaemia and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and anaemia of chronic disease: a randomised placebo controlled double blind 52 weeks clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether recombinant human erythropoietin (r-hu-Epo) improves anaemia and reduces disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and anaemia of chronic disease (ACD). METHODS: A 52 week placebo controlled randomised double blind trial with r-hu-Epo was performed in 70 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and ACD. Thirty four patients were treated with 240 U kg-1 r-hu-Epo subcutaneously, initially three doses weekly, while 36 patients received placebo. RESULTS: A significant increase of haemoglobin from a median of 112 to 135 g litre-1 occurred in the Epo group within six weeks and could be sustained with reduced doses (median 240 U kg-1 once weekly). Sustained benefit compared to placebo was also apparent by six weeks for disease activity, as indicated by the Paulus 20% response rate. Of patients in the Epo group, 32% eventually showed a Paulus 20% response, compared to 8% of the placebo group (P = 0.016). Significant differences in favour of the Epo group were also observed in the secondary disease activity measures Ritchie index, number of swollen joints, pain score, ESR, and patients' global assessment of disease activity. C reactive protein concentrations did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ACD in rheumatoid arthritis with r-hu-Epo is effective in restoring normal haemoglobin levels and also exerts a beneficial effect on disease activity.