Optimal timing of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump support in high-risk coronary patients.

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment, on outcome and cost, in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting have been demonstrated. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to determine the optimal timing for preoperative IABP support in a cohort of high-risk patients. METHODS: Sixty consecutive high-risk patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (presenting with two or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30, unstable angina, reoperation, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. Thirty patients did not receive preoperative IABP (controls), 30 patients had preoperative IABP therapy starting 2 hours (T2), 12 hours (T12), or 24 hours (T24), by random assignment, before the operation. Fifty patients had preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction mean, less than 0.30 (less than 0.26+/-0.08), (n = 40) unstable angina, 28% (n = 17) left main stenosis, and 32% (n = 19) were reoperations. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in the IABP groups. There was one death in the IABP group and six in the control group. The complication rate for IABP was 8.3% (n = 5) without group differences. Cardiac index was significantly higher postoperatively (p<0.001) in patients with preoperative IABP treatment compared with controls. There were no significant differences between the three IABP subgroups at any time. The incidence of postoperative low cardiac output was significantly lower in the IABP groups (p<0.001). Intubation time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital was shorter in the IABP groups (p = 0.211, p<0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no differences between the IABP subgroups in any of the studied variables. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting was confirmed. There were no differences in outcome between the subgroups; therefore, at 2 hours preoperatively, IABP therapy can be started.     

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.     

Expansion of PCI at the Expense of Bypass Surgery Jeopardizes Protection against Premature Death

Prophylactic use of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to open-heart surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function is still under debate. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &;lt; 40% were therefore compared according to time of IABP placement, viz. preoperative (n = 56), intraoperative (n = 40) or postoperative (n = 17), and also with patients who did not receive mechanical support despite LVEF &;lt; 40% (n = 78). The main indication for preoperative IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function (80%), while patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement mainly presented with low cardiac-output syndrome (70%/53%). Preoperative IABP was associated with a low mortality rate (8.9%), whereas patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement had a high mortality risk and an increased catecholamine requirement. Of the patients scheduled for surgery without prophylactic IABP, 19% required intra- or postoperative insertion. Prophylactic placement of IABP thus reduced the mortality rate as well as the postoperative need for mechanical and catecholamine support. Need for intraoperative IABP insertion was associated with high mortality, whereas the outcome after postoperative IABP placement depended on the indication for the measure.     

Evaluation of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping for high risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

We evaluated the effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) support in high risk patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Between November 1999 and December 2010, 65 high-risk patients underwent OPCAB with the support of IABP inserted preoperatively. High risks were considered as (1) left main coronary artery stem stenosis > or = 75%, (2) unstable angina requiring intravenous nitrates and heparin, (3) preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30%, (4) bilateral carotid artery stenosis > or = 75%. There were no hospital deaths or cerebrovascular complications. During operations, hemodynamics was stable with the support of low dose catecholamines, and no patient needed conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were able to be weaned from IABP within 3 days (mean 5.7 hours) after the operation and were extubated within 4 days (mean 11.5 hours) after the operation. One patient had a peripheral embolism which might be related to insertion of IABP (1.5%). Preoperative IABP in high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB was considered to be useful and safe.     

高危患者主动脉内球囊反搏辅助下不停跳冠脉搭桥体会

目的探讨严重冠状动脉三支血管病变（狭窄〉75％）的高危患者在主动脉内球囊反搏（IABP）辅助下行非体外循环下冠脉搭桥术的安全性。方法回顾2002年1月至2007年12月间27例高危冠心病患者,在IABP支持下行非体外循环下冠脉搭桥术临床资料。结果本组患者冠状动脉造影均提示严重三支血管病变,15例合并左主干病变（狭窄〉75％）,均属高危（EuroSeore〉6分）,无术中死亡、术后死亡1例,搭桥2～7支、平均（3．2&#177;1．1）支。结论对于冠脉严重三支血管病变高危病例,在预先置入IABP的辅助下可以安全地施行非体外循环下的冠脉搭桥术。     

Aortomyoplasty: hemodynamics and comparison to the intraaortic balloon pump

BACKGROUND: Aortomyoplasty (AMP), a procedure in which the latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) is wrapped around the aorta and stimulated during diastole, is a potential method of chronic counterpulsation. Counterpulsation by the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is a proven treatment for ischemic coronary syndrome and heart failure but cannot be used chronically. This study examined the long-term potential of a unique AMP configuration and compared its performance to the IABP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AMP was done using a wringer configuration (AMP-W) in nine dogs. Six and 12 months later, acute hemodynamic augmentation was evaluated by measuring differences in mean diastolic aortic pressure (mDAP), peak left ventricular pressure (pLVP), and the endocardial viability ratio (EVR) between stimulated and unstimulated beats. RESULTS: The diastolic augmentation obtained by AMP-W at 6 months and by AMP-W and IABP at 12 months was statistically significant. Additionally, the enhancements in EVR (16.1 +/- 4.3%), mDAP (8.6 +/- 2.5%), and pLVP (-1.8 +/- 1.0%) at 6 months were similar to those in EVR (19.1 +/- 5.2%), mDAP (13.1 +/- 3.6%), and pLVP (-0.8 +/- 1.3%) at 12 months. Most importantly, the augmentation obtained by AMP-W at 12 months was similar to that of the IABP: EVR (17.1 +/- 5.9%), mDAP (13.4 +/- 6.7%), and pLVP (-1.5 +/- 0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: AMP-W is a safe, robust procedure, capable of providing counterpulsation equivalent to the IABP, 12 months following surgery. The potential for AMP-W to offer chronic counterpulsation and to benefit the ischemic heart should be investigated further.     

The effect and role of the intraaortic balloon pumping in off-pump coronary artery bypass

Eighty consecutive patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) were studied. They were divided into group I (n = 10) which received preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and group II (n = 70) which did not receive IABP. The indications for preoperative IABP were severe left main coronary artery disease in 7 patients, severe 3 vessel disease in 3 patients, unstable angina in 5 patients, acute myocardial infarction in 3 patients. There was no operative mortality in both groups. The average number of distal anastomosis 2.7/patients in group I and 3.3/patients in group II. There was no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and morbidity between 2 groups. The average postoperative IABP support time was 5.4 hours. There was no IABP-related complication in group I. IABP was very effective to perform OPCAB surgery safety. Preoperative IABP may be effective modality to support OPCAB surgery not only in emergent case but also in elective case.     

Preoperative intraaortic balloon pumps in high-risk patients undergoing open heart surgery

BACKGROUND: The use of the preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction or unstable angina with critical coronary anatomy is becoming more frequent as surgical casemix changes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients having open heart surgery. METHODS: Prospectively collected data for 645 consecutive patients were reviewed. Patients receiving an IABP were identified and grouped as follows: group A (preoperative IABP for high-risk nonemergent cases), group B (preoperative IABP for emergent cases), and group C (intra/postoperative IABP). Risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates in these three groups was compared using the modified Parsonnet score for preoperative risk stratification. RESULTS: IABPs were used in 101 cases (16%). The predicted versus actual hospital mortality rate was 20% versus 5.7% in group A, 32.1% versus 47.6% in group B, and 12.6% versus 22.2% in group C (group A vs group B, p = 0.0014; group A vs group C, p = 0.012). IABP-related morbidity occurred in 3% of cases (all in group C). CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted mortality was significantly lower in high-risk cases with preoperative IABPs compared with emergent cases and intraoperative/postoperative IABPs. We encourage the use of preoperative IABPs in selected high-risk patients.     

The use of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in open heart surgery

AIM: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy before open heart surgery has been suggested for 'high risk' patients. METHODS: Records from patients undergoing open heart surgery at our institution between June 1999 and February 2002 were reviewed. Indication for IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study: 41 male, 14 female, age 64+/-9 years. Fifty-one (92.7%) required coronary artery bypass brafting (CABG) alone or as a combined procedure, 2 (3.6%) required mitral valve surgery, and 2 (3.6%) needed more complex cardiac procedures. Thirty-two patients (58%) underwent emergency cardiac surgery and 11 patients (20%) suffered from acute preoperative MI. The overall 30 days mortality was 9%. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 6+/-8 days. Four patients (7.2%) developed postoperative renal failure requiring temporary hemodialysis. Three patients (5.4%) developed IABP related peripheral vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative morbidity and mortality is increased despite preoperative IABP, particularly in patients with acute MI. In contrast to studies not using this approach, preoperative IABP reduces morbidity and mortality of high risk patients. IABP related complications are low. Our data suggest that high risk patients profit from preoperative IABP therapy, however, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

Use of an intraaortic balloon pump in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Prophylactic use of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to open-heart surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function is still under debate. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were therefore compared according to time of IABP placement, viz. preoperative (n = 56), intraoperative (n = 40) or postoperative (n = 17), and also with patients who did not receive mechanical support despite LVEF < 40% (n = 78). The main indication for preoperative IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function (80%), while patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement mainly presented with low cardiac-output syndrome (70%/53%). Preoperative IABP was associated with a low mortality rate (8.9%), whereas patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement had a high mortality risk and an increased catecholamine requirement. Of the patients scheduled for surgery without prophylactic IABP, 19% required intra- or postoperative insertion. Prophylactic placement of IABP thus reduced the mortality rate as well as the postoperative need for mechanical and catecholamine support. Need for intraoperative IABP insertion was associated with high mortality, whereas the outcome after postoperative IABP placement depended on the indication for the measure.     

What role should the intra-aortic balloon have in cardiac surgery.

Intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) to assist the failing circulation has become widely applied and accepted since its introduction in 1968. The elective, preoperative use of IABP for patients undergoing cardiac surgery has now become the controversy. The purposes of this report are to examine our experience with IABP and to determine its appropriate role in high-risk patients. IABP was utilized in 75 of 2333 (3.2%) adult cardiac surgical patients at Emory University Hospital from January 1976 through June 1978. IABP was required for refractory shock following cardiopulmonary bypass (CB) in 53 patients, for preoperative cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (CSMI) in nine and was electively placed prior to CB in 13. Sixty-two patients (81%) were able to separate from CB with IABP and pharmacologic support and were assisted 24-432 hours (median 64 hours). Fifty-five (73%) were weaned from IABP. Fifty (67%) are hospital survivors; late deaths have occurred in six patients (8%). Hemodynamic effect of IABP was demonstrated by comparison of pumping 1:1 to 1:8 mode in five balloon-dependent patients after CB. IABP was found to decrease systolic blood pressure, left ventricular filling pressure and peripheral resistance (p < .05). It increased diastolic and mean blood pressure, cardiac index and the endocardial viability ratio (p < .05). The post-CB use of IABP resulted in highest salvage when utilized to support failing hearts that required surgery despite recent preoperative infarction or when intraoperative ischemic injury had occurred. Poorest results were in patients with extensive chronic myocardial damage. Except in the case of preoperative cardiogenic shock, it was impossible to establish statistically reliable criteria for patients in whom elective preoperative insertion was found to be necessary. Careful surgical and anesthesia management with good monitoring can be used instead of preoperative IABP in the majority of (if not all) hemodynamically stable patients regardless of risk classification.     

Hybrid model analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump performance as a function of ventricular and circulatory parameters

We investigated the effects of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) on endocardial viability ratio (EVR), cardiac output (CO), end-systolic (V(es)) and end-diastolic (V(ed)) ventricular volumes, total coronary blood flow (TCBF), and ventricular energetics (external work [EW], pressure-volume area [PVA]) under different ventricular (E(max) and diastolic stiffness) and circulatory (arterial compliance) parameters. We derived a hybrid model from a computational model, which is based on merging computational and hydraulic submodels. The lumped parameter computational submodel consists of left and right hearts and systemic, pulmonary, and coronary circulations. The hydraulic submodel includes part of the systemic arterial circulation, essentially a silicone rubber tube representing the aorta, which contains a 40-mL IAB. EVR, CO, V(es), and V(ed), TCBF and ventricular energetics (EW, PVA) were analyzed against the ranges of left ventricular E(max) (0.3-0.5-1 mm Hg/cm(3)) and diastolic stiffness V(stiffness) (≈0.08 and ≈0.3 mm Hg/cm(3), obtained by changing diastolic stiffness constant) and systemic arterial compliance (1.8-2.5 cm(3)/mm Hg). All experiments were performed comparing the selected variables before and during IABP assistance. Increasing E(maxl) from 0.5 to 2 mm Hg/cm(3) resulted in IABP assistance producing lower percentage changes in the selected variables. The changes in ventricular diastolic stiffness strongly influence both absolute value of EVR and its variations during IABP (71 and 65% for lower and higher arterial compliance, respectively). V(ed) and V(es) changes are rather small but higher for lower E(max) and higher V(stiffness). Lower E(max) and higher V(stiffness) resulted in higher TCBF and CO during IABP assistance (～35 and 10%, respectively). The use of this hybrid model allows for testing real devices in realistic, stable, and repeatable circulatory conditions. Specifically, the presented results show that IABP performance is dependent, at least in part, on left ventricular filling, ejection characteristics, and arterial compliance. It is possible in this way to simulate patient-specific conditions and predict the IABP performance at different values of the circulatory or ventricular parameters. Further work is required to study the conditions for heart recovery modeling, baroreceptor controls, and physiological feedbacks.     

Anesthetic management of high-risk cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery under the support of intraaortic balloon pump.

Patients with severely impaired left ventricular function, an uncorrectable coronary artery disease, and a recent myocardial infarction are at high risk of cardiac complications after major noncardiac surgery. We present two patients with extensive three-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent intraperitoneal surgery under the support of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP). In one patient, the IABP was inserted urgently because of the development of chest pain with significant ST depression on arrival in the operating room, and the other patient was managed with prophylactic IABP. There were no intraoperative or postoperative cardiac events in either patient. Thus, IABP should be considered in the perioperative management of patients with severe cardiac diseases.     

Vascular complications of intra-aortic balloon insertion in patients undergoing coronary reavscularization: analysis of 911 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a well-accepted and widely used mechanical circulatory support in cardiac surgical practice. We evaluated the vascular complications of IABP and risk factors associated with the development of these complications in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 2000, a total of 911 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting received IABP. The preoperative risk factors, balloon-related variables and vascular complications were studied and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of vascular complications. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 59.2+/-9.1 years and 10.5% of the patients were female. The incidence of diabetes and peripheral vascular disease was 41.1 and 8.5%, respectively. The mean Parsonnet score was 11.8+/-4.6. IABP was inserted by percutaneous technique in 96.8% of patients. The duration of IABP therapy ranged from 20 h to 21 days (mean 3.8 days). Fifty-four (5.9%) patients developed major and 53 (5.8%) patients developed minor vascular complications. Ischaemia of the limb, requiring thromboembolectomy, developed in 25 (2.7%) patients. Patients who received IABP preoperatively had higher incidence of major vascular complications as compared to patients who received IABP in operating room before induction of anaesthesia. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed age, triple vessel disease, indications of IABP therapy (unstable angina, cardiac arrhythmia and haemodynamic instability), left ventricular aneurysm surgery and use of balloon with sheath as independent risk factors for the development of vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: IABP therapy is associated with certain vascular complications, which should always be kept in mind before insertion of a balloon. The use of a balloon without sheath and proper evaluation of peripheral circulation can help to minimize the development of vascular complications.     

Intraaortic balloon pumping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Beneficial effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) treatment in high-risk patients who had open heart surgery have been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients having CABG at our institution were reviewed. Patients having an IABP were identified retrospectively and grouped into one of 3 groups as follows. Group A (n = 14): preoperative IABP for high-risk urgent or elective cases. Group B (n = 26): preoperative IABP for emergency cases. Group C (n = 6): unplanned intraoperative or postoperative IABP. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had an IABP (16.6% of total). Parsonnet score in group B was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Length of operation for group C was significantly longer (p < 0.05). Overall hospital mortality in the total group of 277 cases was 4.2%. Hospital mortality was 7.1% in group A, 7.7% in group B, and 50% in group C. Hospital mortality in group C was significantly higher (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative treatment with IABP in high-risk patients undergoing CABG was confirmed. This approach resulted in a significantly lower hospital mortality.     

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon support in surgery for left main coronary stenosis.

Twenty-six patients with left main coronary (LMC) stenosis were operated upon with preoperative intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) support. There was no mortality, and no morbidity attributable to the balloon catheter. The most delicate facet of revascularization surgery in this entity is the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass phase including anesthesia induction during which blood pressure fluctuation may further diminish severely compromised coronary flow. Although systolic pressure dropped to below 100 mm Hg in 50% of patients during induction, there were only two patients with electrocardiographic evidence of perioperative myocardial infarction, and only one who needed rantic institution of cardiopulmonary bypass just after induction. Perioperative logistics were quite trouble free in all 26 patients, in marked contrast to 5 LMC patients operated upon prior to our preoperative IABP concent; 3 of these deteriorated upon induction, with two deaths resulting. Preoperative IABP is a reasonable supportive adjunct in surgery for LMC stenosis.     

Effective surgical management of high-risk coronary patients using preoperative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation therapy.

The proportion of high-risk coronary patients submitted to surgical myocardial revascularization (CABG) is steadily increasing. High-risk patients utilize more hospital resources and have a higher procedural cost than low-moderate risk CABG patients. An efficient management is essential to improve outcome and reduce costs. This report entails three study periods. In an initial retrospective study coronary high-risk criteria were established. At least two of the following factors were required: redo CABG, unstable angina, left main stem stenosis greater than 70%, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.30 and diffuse coronary artery disease. Poor preoperative cardiac performance was the major contributing factor for poor outcome. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation therapy (IABP) was introduced as preoperative therapy. During a second study period prospective randomized studies found preoperative IABP-therapy efficient, significantly improving both preoperative cardiac index (P < 0.0001), decreasing postoperative mortality (P < 0.0001) and morbidity, shorten intensive care unit stay as well as total hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Drug consumption was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). Optimal timing was found to be 2 h prior to aortic cross-clamping and the therapy was found highly cost-beneficial with an average 36% reduction of the total procedural cost. During a third study period, well beyond any study protocol period, preoperative IABP therapy was again found highly effective with a close to 100% utilization rate in high-risk patients and continuous efficacy with excellent outcome, despite acceptance of sicker patients. During this post-study evaluation period 1/3 of the high-risk patients presented with 4 of the established risk factors.The use of preoperative IABP therapy is therefore highly recommended for high-risk coronary patients undergoing CABG.     

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) placement in high-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery (CABG). The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were IABP-related complications (bleeding, leg ischemia, aortic dissection). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane registry of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies that fulfilled our a priori inclusion criteria. Eligibility decisions, relevance, study validity, and data extraction were performed in duplicate using pre-specified criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. RESULTS: Ten publications fulfilled our eligibility criteria, of which four were RCTs and six were cohort studies with controls. There were statistical as well as clinical heterogeneity among included studies. A total of 1034 patients received preoperative IABP and 1329 did not receive preoperative IABP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for hospital mortality in patients treated with preoperative IABP was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.21-0.82, p = 0.01). The number needed to treat was 17. The pooled OR for hospital mortality from randomized trials was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.57, p = 0.003) and from cohort studies was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.24-1.2, p = 0.13). Overall, 3.7% (13 of 349) of patients who received preoperative IABP developed either limb ischemia or haematoma at the IABP insertion site, and most of these complications improved after discontinuation of IABP. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this meta-analysis support the use of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients to reduce hospital mortality.     

Beneficial Effect of Preventative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping in High-Risk Patients Undergoing First-Time Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting—A Single Center Experience

Although intra‐aortic balloon pumping (IABP) has been used widely as a routine cardiac assist device for perioperative support in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the optimal timing for high‐risk patients undergoing first‐time CABG using IABP is unknown. The purpose of this investigation is to compare preoperative and preventative IABP insertion with intraoperative or postoperative obligatory IABP insertion in high‐risk patients undergoing first‐time CABG. We reviewed our IABP patients' database from 2002 to 2007; there were 311 CABG patients who received IABP treatment perioperatively. Of 311 cases, 41 high‐risk patients who had first‐time on‐pump or off‐pump CABG (presenting with three or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.45, unstable angina, CABG combined with aneurysmectomy, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. We compared perioperatively the clinical results of 20 patients who underwent preoperative IABP placement (Group 1) with 21 patients who had obligatory IABP placement intraoperatively or postoperatively during CABG (Group 2). There were no differences in preoperative risk factors, except left ventricular aneurysm resection, between the two groups. There were no differences in indications for high‐risk patients between the two groups. The mean number of grafts was similar. There were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, or in cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and infective complications postoperatively. There were no IABP‐related complications in either group. Major adverse cardiac event (severe hypotension and/or shock, myocardial infarction, and severe hemodynamic instability) was higher in Group 2 (14 [66.4%] vs. 1 [5%], P < 0.0001) during surgery. The time of IABP pumping in Group 1 was shorter than in Group 2 (72.5 ± 28.9 h vs. 97.5 ± 47.7 h, P < 0.05). The duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay in Group 1 was significantly shorter than in Group 2, respectively (22.0 ± 1.6 h vs. 39.6 ± 2.1 h, P < 0.01 and 58.0 ± 1.5 h vs. 98.5 ± 1.9 h, P < 0.005). There were no differences in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in Group 1 and n = 3 in Group 2). Preoperative and preventative insertion of IABP can be performed safely in selected high‐risk patients undergoing CABG, with results comparable to those in patients who received obligatory IABP intraoperatively and postoperatively. Therefore, earlier IABP support as part of surgical strategy may help to improve the outcome in high‐risk first‐time CABG patients.     

Prognostic significance of endocardial viability ratio in aortocoronary bypass surgery.

Although aortocoronary bypass (ACB) for patients with stable angina carries a low mortality, some unexpected deaths do occur. Since in patients with normal coronary arteries the endocardial viability ratio (EVR) can be correlated with subendocardial perfusion, with a ratio of 0.7 or less indicating ischemia of the left ventricular subendocardium, and since the EVR postoperatively is useful in determining the need for intra-aortic balloon pump assist (IABPA), it was decided to ascertain whether the EVR might have prognostic value in patients with stable angina scheduled for standard ACB. Three groups of patients were studied: 50 with stable angina, 24 who had died after ACB, and 18 who required IABPA for cardiogenic shock after surgery for stable angina. No significant differences were found for cardiac index, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction and pre- and postoperative artery scores, but there were significant differences in the EVR between the first and second groups and between the first and third groups (P less than 0.01 in each instance). These findings suggest that the left ventricular EVR may indeed be of prognostic value in patients scheduled to undergo ACB and that use of IABPA, which produces an increase in EVR, may be useful in patients with EVRs of less than 0.7, even if other parameters of cardiac function are normal.