Aneurysm formation after drug‐eluting balloon treatment of drug‐eluting in‐stent restenosis: First case report

A 55‐year‐old male underwent paclitaxel‐eluting stent implantation in a bifurcation lesion of his left anterior descending artery (LAD) during an episode of unstable angina in 2008. A late in‐stent restenosis developed 15 months after implantation of the drug‐eluting stent (DES) and was treated with paclitaxel eluting balloon. Two months later, during angiography for functional assessment of the significance of lesions in the circumflex artery, an aneurysm at the place of drug‐eluting balloon (DEB) inflation was observed. The patient was left on double antiplatelet therapy and scheduled for clinical observation after 3 months and control coronary angiography after 6 months for aneurysm progression follow‐up. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Decreased risk of stent fracture‐related restenosis between paclitaxel‐eluting stents and sirolimus eluting stents: Results of long‐term follow‐up

Objective: To compare the outcomes between paclitaxel‐eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) for the treatment of drug‐eluting stent (DES) fracture. Background: DES fracture is considered as an important predictor of in‐stent restenosis (ISR). However, little data are available evaluating the optimal treatment for this complication of coronary stenting. Methods: From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008, patients with DES ISR treated with a second DES were identified and evaluated for stent fracture. Stent fracture was defined by the presence of strut separation in multiple angiographic projections, assessed by two independent reviewers. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 and 12 months were the primary end points. Results: Of 131 lesions with DES ISR treated with a second DES, we found 24 patients (24 lesions, 18.2%) with angiographically confirmed stent fracture. Of these, 20 patients (20 lesions) treated with either PES (n = 11/55%) or SES (n = 9/45%) were included in the study. TLR at 6 months occurred in 9% of patients treated with PES and 22% of those treated with SES (P = 0.41). After 12 months, TLR was 9% and 55.5%, respectively (P = 0.024). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a high incidence of stent fracture in patients presenting with DES ISR in need of further treatment with another DES. The suggested association between treatment of stent fracture‐associated DES ISR with PES as compared with SES, and better long‐term outcomes, is in need of confirmation by larger prospective registries and randomized trials. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Paclitaxel‐eluting balloon: From bench to bed

Since the first clinical angioplasty by Gruntzig in 1977, restenosis has been the primary drawback of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the balloon era. restenosis was correlated with elastic recoil and negative remodeling of the arterial wall. Later, introduction of stents proved to be a significant advance in reducing the elastic recoil and negative remodeling at the treatment site but stimulated proliferation, migration of smooth muscle cells, and neointimal hyperplasia, thereby generating a new type of restenosis, in‐stent restenosis. Brachytherapy and drug‐eluting stents (DES) may be considered the two breakthroughs against neointimal hyperplasia. However, concerns about stent thrombosis and incomplete elimination of in‐stent restenosis with DES in complex lesions and patients justify the pursuit of research in this field. Non‐stent based local drug delivery and particularly the use of paclitaxel‐eluting balloons could be one of these strategies. We aimed to review the concept, preclinical‐, and clinical data available with non‐stent based local drug delivery and, in particular, with paclitaxel‐eluting balloons. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Clinical outcomes of drug‐eluting versus bare‐metal in‐stent restenosis

In‐stent restenosis (ISR) is a challenging syndrome that affects drug‐eluting stents and bare‐metal stents. However, data comparing the outcomes of drug‐eluting versus bare‐metal ISR are limited. Our objective was to evaluate the long‐term clinical outcomes of drug‐eluting versus bare‐metal ISR. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at Cleveland Clinic for ISR from 05/1999 to 06/2007 were included. Unadjusted outcomes were tested using Kaplan‐Meier curves followed by multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses. Twenty seven variables, including type of stent used to treat ISR and procedural date, were included. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were components of the primary endpoint. Of 931 patients identified, 225 had drug‐eluting ISR and 706 had bare‐metal ISR. There were 279 cumulative events for a median follow‐up of 3.2 years. The primary endpoint was not different between drug eluting and bare‐metal ISR (22% versus 33%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–1.66; P = 0.49). The secondary endpoints of death (8% versus 16%, adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56–1.98; P = 0.88), MI (4% versus 5%, adjusted HR 1.48; 95% CI, 0.54–4.04; P = 0.45), and TLR (15% versus 16%, adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI, 0.81–2.11; P = 0.28) were also not different. This study represents the largest analysis comparing drug‐eluting to bare‐metal ISR. On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, drug‐eluting and bare‐metal ISR have similar long term outcomes. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Difference of neointimal growth patterns in bifurcation lesions among four kinds of drug‐eluting stents

Aim: Neointimal proliferation of bifurcation lesions after implantation of drug‐eluting stents (DES) has not been well evaluated. Thus, we compared neointimal proliferation of bifurcation lesions among four DES using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 8‐month follow‐up OCT was performed in 68 bifurcation lesions treated by 15 sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) and 17 paclitaxel‐eluting stents (PES) as first‐generation DES, and by 17 zotarolimus‐eluting stents (ZES) and 19 everolimus‐eluting stents (EES) as second‐generation DES. Cross‐sectional images of the bifurcation lesion using OCT were analyzed every 450 µm. All images were divided into three areas: inner wall of the bifurcation (IB), outer wall of the bifurcation (OB), and ostium of the side branch (SB). We compared the incidence of uncovered struts (IUS) among three areas and the averaged neointimal thickness (NIH) between IB and OB in each stent and also compared these OCT parameters among all DES. Results: There were no significant differences of IUS between IB and OB in second‐generation DES, while in first‐generation DES, IUS of IB and OB showed significant differences. The IUS of SES in both areas was significantly higher than in the other DES (all P < 0.001). PES had a significantly higher IUS in SB than the others (all P < 0.001). NIH of OB was significantly higher than that of IB in PES, ZES, and EES, but in SES the NIH was similar in the two areas. Conclusions: OCT revealed different neointimal growth patterns among SES, PES, ZES, and EES in bifurcation lesions. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow up of paclitaxel‐ and sirolimus‐eluting stent after poststent high‐pressure balloon dilation: From the poststent optimal stent expansion trial

Objectives : The aims of this study were to identify the efficacy of optimal stent expansion (OSE) according to the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study) criteria in drug‐eluting stent (DES) and compare paclitaxel‐eluting stent (PES) to sirolimus‐eluting stent (SES). Background : Although poststent high‐pressure balloon dilatation is proposed after bare metal stent implantation according to OSE, defined by the criteria of the MUSIC Study, very little data are available in DES. Methods : Two hundred fifty patients (M:F = 149:101; age, 61.5 ± 9.2 years) who underwent 9‐month follow‐up angiography in the Poststent Optimal Stent Expansion Trial (POET) were included in this study. We assessed angiographic in‐stent restenosis (ISR) and neointima volume (NV) using IVUS at 9 months. Results : At 9‐month follow up, there were no significant differences in ISR and NV index (NV/stent length, mm²) between patients with and without OSE. However, the rate of ISR and NV index were higher in PES [ISR: 18 (13.7%) and 4 (3.4%), P = 0.004; NV index: 1.02 ± 0.99 mm² and 0.21 ± 0.37, P < 0.001 in PES and SES]. Conclusions : OSE according to the MUSIC Study criteria was not related to ISR and NV in the DES era but PES had a significantly higher ISR rate and NV than SES after poststent high‐pressure balloon dilatation. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

3‐year follow‐up of 100 consecutive coronary bifurcation lesions treated with Taxus stents and the crush technique

Objectives : To determine the 3 year safety and efficacy of crush‐stenting with paclitaxel‐eluting stents. Background : The optimum two‐stent strategy for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions is undetermined. Crush‐stenting is advocated to minimize restenosis through complete circumferential stent coverage; long‐term follow‐up data are lacking. Methods and Results : In a single center prospective registry, 100 consecutive patients with bifurcation lesions were treated with the Crush technique. The vast majority (93%) were true bifurcations, predominantly involving the left anterior descending and diagonal arteries. Technical success was 98%. Final kissing balloon dilatation, which became standard practice during the study, was attempted in 68 patients and successful in 51. Abciximab was used in all cases. There were no peri‐procedural stent thromboses. Follow‐up was 100% at 3 years. Symptom‐driven target lesion revascularisation was 8% at 3 years. Cumulative 3‐year major adverse cardiac events was 28% (7 cardiac deaths, 15 myocardial infarctions, 11 target vessel revascularisations). Absence of a final kissing inflation predicted repeat revascularisation but not death, infarction or stent thrombosis. Three probable stent thromboses occurred, of which two were very late. Conclusion : Where a two‐stent bifurcation strategy is required, Crush‐stenting with paclitaxel‐eluting stents is safe and effective in the long‐term. Failure to perform a final kissing dilatation increases the likelihood of revascularisation but not other adverse events. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

In‐Stent Restenosis

The introduction of coronary stents marked a major turning point in the practice of interventional cardiology. Whereas the efficacy of balloon angioplasty was challenged both by immediate mechanical complications and by a high incidence of restenosis, coronary stents offered cardiologists a means by which to not only augment immediate procedural success, but also to reduce the incidence of restenosis following coronary intervention. However, despite technological advances and an improved understanding of the restenotic process, the overall rate of in‐stent restenosis following bare metal stent implantation remains high. Although the introduction of drug‐eluting stents has further reduced the incidence of restenosis, the “real‐world” application of drug‐eluting stents in increasingly complex lesion and patient subsets has given way to the even greater clinical challenge of managing drug‐eluting stent restenosis. Although the standard treatment of bare metal stent restenosis typically involves placement of a drug‐eluting stent, the optimal therapeutic approach to drug‐eluting stent restenosis remains less defined. The issue of in‐stent restenosis (especially following implantation of a drug‐eluting stent) remains a clinical challenge, and investigation into therapeutic options remains ongoing. As technology evolves, such investigation will likely incorporate novel approaches including drug‐coated balloons novel stent designs.     

Long‐term clinical,angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound outcomes of biodegradable polymer‐coated sirolimus‐eluting stents

Background: The residual drug carriers on drug‐eluting stents (DES) surfaces are considered to be one of the most significant reasons causing late thrombosis. There is no documented data currently available on the safety/benefit profile beyond 6 months of EXCEL stent, a novel sirolimus‐eluting stent with biodegradable polymer coating, in treating patients with coronary artery disease (CHD). Objective: To evaluate the long‐term efficacy and safety of EXCEL stent on treating CHD patients. Methods: Between February and March 2006, a consecutive cohort of complex patients treated with the EXCEL stent was prospectively enrolled in this single‐center registry. Antiplatelet protocol was 6‐month dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by aspirin alone indefinitely. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included in‐segment and in‐stent late lumen loss and binary restenosis rate measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis at 8 months postindex PCI procedure. Results: A total of 100 patients with 153 lesions were included in this analysis. Most lesions (83.0%) were classified as complex (B2/C). At 12 months, four patients (4.0%) experienced MACE, which were four target‐lesion revascularizations due to in‐stent restenosis (ISR). All patients received follow‐up up to 24 ± 0.4 months and no cardiac death, MI, and in‐stent thrombosis occurred during the 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy or the subsequent 15 months of aspirin treatment alone. QCA analysis of 112 lesions from 75 patients showed 3.6% (4/112) in‐stent lesion restenosis, 5.4% (6/112) in‐segment lesion restenosis, 0.12 ± 0.34 mm in‐stent late lumen loss, and 0.08 ± 0.35 mm in‐segment late lumen loss. Conclusions: In this single‐center experience with complex patients and lesions, the EXCEL^TM stent implantation with 6‐month dual antiplatelet treatment proved to markedly reduce the incidence of 24‐month ISR and MACE. These preliminary findings require further validation by large scale, randomized trials. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting with zotarolimus (Endeavor) drug‐eluting stents

Objectives: To report the safety and efficacy of zotarolimus eluting stents for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Background: Percutaneous stent insertion is an increasingly popular alternative to bypass surgery for the management of left main (LM) coronary artery disease. While data support the use of sirolimus‐ and paclitaxel‐coated stents in the LM coronary artery, there are no published series reporting results with Endeavor (zotarolimus) stents, particularly in the context of unprotected left main (ULM) lesions. Methods: We retrospectively identified 40 consecutive patients who had ULM disease treated with Endeavor stents (ZES) and who had follow‐up angiography. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac/unexplained death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and in‐stent restenosis (ISR)/target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in all cases. Follow‐up angiography occurred on average 5.6 ± 0.9 months after the index procedure. There were three incidences of ISR requiring TLR and another patient who had a NSTEMI in the follow‐up period. At late follow‐up (12.4 ± 1.8 months) three patients underwent CABG (one for RCA stenosis) and four patients died without knowledge of the status of the ULM stent (two cardiovascular and two deaths related to cancer progression). Conclusions: In conclusion, our experience with Endeavor stents for the treatment of ULM disease demonstrates excellent angiographic and clinical outcomes, with a 7.5% ISR/TLR rate and a 15% MACE rate, respectively, at an average clinical follow‐up of 12.4 months. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparison of zotarolimus‐ versus everolimus‐eluting stents in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions

Objectives : To compare zotarolimus‐eluting stent (Endeavor Sprint®; ZES‐S) and the everolimus‐eluting stent (Xience V®; EES) in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions Background : Both these stents have demonstrated good outcomes in the treatment of coronary lesions. However, the outcomes with respect to treatment of bifurcation lesions have yet to be conclusively demonstrated. Methods : In this single centered, nonrandomized, open label study, we treated, between August 2006 and December 2008, 110 bifurcations with ZES‐S and, in a second stage of the study, 129 bifurcations with EES. The primary end point was to compare the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, and new target lesion revascularization) in‐hospital and at 12 months of follow‐up. Provisional T stenting was the strategy used in the majority of cases. Angiographic follow‐up was performed only in patients who presented signs or symptoms suggestive of angina or ischemia. Results : There were no significant differences in in‐hospital MACE between the groups (ZES‐S: 8.1%; EES: 6.2%; P = 0.5). At 12 months, the ZES‐S group had significantly more MACE than the EES group (23.1% vs. 4.5%; P < 0.001) and an elevated index of new revascularization of the bifurcation (17.5% vs. 3.2%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality (four patients in ZES‐S vs. one in EES; P = 0.14). Conclusion : The treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions using everolimus‐eluting stents results in better outcomes at 12 months of follow‐up than zotarolimus‐eluting stents. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparison between sirolimus‐ and paclitaxel‐eluting stents in complex patient and lesions subsets

Background : Sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel‐eluting stents (PES) both significantly reduce the need for repeat intervention compared to bare metal stents. Studies comparing the clinical outcomes of these stents in noncomplex subsets of patients and lesions demonstrate a similar safety and efficacy profile. The data for more complex subsets of patients and lesions remains conflicting. This study aimed to compare SES with PES in a selected population with a broad range of complex features. Methods and Results : The patient population consisted of 1,591 consecutive patients with complex features undergoing drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation. In the SES group there were 1,095 patients (1,653 lesions) and in the PES group 496 patients (802 lesions). In‐hospital, 30‐day, and 12‐month clinical outcomes were compared between groups. No discernable difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between SES and PES was detected at intermediate and longer‐term follow‐up (SES 22.4% vs. PES 20.5% at 12 months; P = 0.407). A trend toward increased angiographically documented stent thrombosis was observed in the SES group at both 3 and 12 months (SES 2.2% vs. PES 0.8% at 12 months; P = 0.051). When adopting the more inclusive definition of probable stent thrombosis, this trend was no longer seen. After adjusting for baseline differences between the two groups, there still remained no difference in MACE between SES and PES (HR 1.051 [CI 0.826–1.339] P = 0.685). The trend toward increased angiographically documented stent thrombosis in the SES group remained after adjustment for baseline differences (HR 2.836 [CI 0.968–8.311] P = 0.057). Conclusions : In a selected population with complex disease the rate of MACE was comparable between SES and PES, with higher overall rates of thrombosis and MACE compared to a noncomplex population. Thus, the focus should be directed to prevent late complications in this complex subset regardless of stent type selection. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Provisional hybrid 2‐stent Strategy utilizing bioresorbable vascular scaffold and drug‐eluting metal stent: “T‐stenting and small protrusion” technique

We present a case of side‐branch restenosis after T‐stenting and small protrusion (TAP) technique using a bioresorbable vascular scaffold and a drug‐eluting metallic stent. According to intravascular ultrasound imaging findings, the simultaneous balloon deflation after kissing balloon post‐dilatation was the likely cause of restenosis. In cases where bifurcation treatment requires the TAP technique, operators should pay particular attention to perform kissing balloon inflation with sequential deflation (main branch first, side branch last). © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Stent fracture associated with drug‐eluting stents: Clinical characteristics and implications

Objective : To evaluate the clinical characteristics and implications of stent fracture in drug‐eluting stents. Background : Approximately 2.5 million drug‐eluting stents are implanted every year worldwide. In 10 randomized controlled trials involving 2,602 patients, no incidence of stent fracture was recognized or reported. Methods : From April 2003 to December 2005, 2,728 patients underwent drug‐eluting stenting. The angiograms of all 530 patients who underwent repeat angiography were analyzed to identify the presence of stent fracture. We then documented the incidence of adverse events associated with drug‐eluting stent fracture and systematically analyzed the clinical, procedural, and structural factors, which might predispose to stent fracture. Results : Stent fracture was identified in 10 patients. None of these fractures were detectable at the time of stent placement. The median time interval from stent implantation to detection of fracture at repeat angiography was 226 days (range, 7–620 days). Adverse clinical outcomes associated with stent fracture occurred in 7 patients (6 patients had binary restenosis and 1 patient had stent thrombosis), all necessitating repeat intervention. Analysis of potential predisposing clinical, procedural, and structural factors revealed that 4 patients had excessive tortuosity in the proximal segment, and overlapping stents were used in 5 cases. All fractures occurred in sirolimus‐eluting stents. Conclusions : Stent fracture may represent a new potential mechanism of restenosis and stent thrombosis in drug‐eluting stents. Predisposing clinical and procedural factors may be vessel tortuosity and use of overlapping stents. The most important predisposing factor, however, may be stent structure, since all fractures occurred in sirolimus‐eluting stents. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The paclitaxel‐eluting coroflex™ please stent study (PECOPS I): The 3‐year clinical follow‐up

Background : The evaluation of drug‐eluting devices in humans should include longterm follow‐up owing to risk of late target vessel thrombosis with the possible fatal sequel. Methods and Results : Therefore, the three‐year clinical outcome of the paclitaxeleluting Corofiex^® Please stent in patients with de‐novo coronary lesions was evaluated in the single‐arm PECOPS I pilot study. The clinical data of 123/125 (98.4%) of all patients included were available 3.05 ± 0.12 years following stent deployment. In the intention‐to‐treat analysis the incidence of cardiac death was 9/123 (7.3%), of myocardial infarction 4/123 (3.3%), and of in‐segment target lesion revascularization 14/123 (11.4%). Target lesion revascularizations tended (p = 0.30) to occur less frequently (9/96 (16.6%)) in those patients in whom the stent length was longer than the lesion (4.80 ± 2.71 mm) compared to 5/27 (18.5%) in those patients in whom the stent was shorter than the lesion (?3.0 ± 2.43 mm). Stent thromboses occurred in 2/123 (1.6%) patients during the first 6 months, one of which two days after premature discontinuation of clopidogrel. The total 3‐year MACE rate was 22/123 (17.9%). Conclusion : The present study describes the paclitaxel‐eluting Corotlex Please stent as a safe device with good long term performance when deployed in native coronary arteries. The occurrence of late major adverse events and late thromboses in particular seem to be very low. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

In‐stent neoatherosclerosis and tissue characteristics of restenotic lesions following implantation of second generation drug‐eluting stents in unrestricted coronary lesions: Optical frequency domain imaging study

BACKGROUND

Differences in stent platform, polymer coatings, and antirestenotic drugs among the current in use second‐generation drug‐eluting stents (G2‐DESs) may induce significant variations in neointimal response and vascular healing, which may impact the prevalence of neoatherosclerosis (NA) and morphological appearance of the restenotic tissue.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Utilizing Optical frequency domain imaging, two independent reviewers, retrospectively compared the prevalence of neoatherosclerosis (NA), and the morphological differences, and tissue characteristics of 50 G2‐DESs in‐stent restenosis (ISR) lesions (35 everolimus‐eluting stent [22 cobalt‐chromium (CoCr), 13 platinum‐chromium (PtCr)], and 15 biolimus‐eluting stent [BES]) implanted liberally in unrestricted coronary lesions. More than half of the stents were implanted in type C lesions, while 40% of the stents were implanted primarily in lesions with recanalized chronic total occlusion. NA, defined as a neointima formation with the presence of lipids or calcification, was observed in fewer than half (24/50) of all ISR lesions with no significant in‐between group differences (41%, 69%, and 40% in CoCr, PtCr, and BES respectively, P = 0.22), nor were there any significant differences in the morphological appearance or tissue characteristics between all G2‐DESs subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging some limitations, our results may suggest that the prevalence of NA and the morphological appearance of restenotic lesions might not differ when G2‐DESs are implanted in unrestricted, rather complex, coronary lesions.

     

One-year outcomes with angiographic follow-up of paclitaxel-eluting balloon for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: insights from Spanish multicenter registry

Introduction: Even in the drug‐eluting stent (DES) era treatment of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) is still a relatively common problem for which a satisfactory solution is yet to be found. We wished to assess the efficacy of a new paclitaxel‐coated drug‐eluting balloon (DEB) in the treatment of these lesions. Methods: In this prospective multicenter registry 126 patients with ISR, treated with a new paclitaxel‐eluting balloon (3.0 μg/m² balloon surface area), were included. All lesions were predilated using conventional balloon angioplasty. The DEB was inflated for a minimum of 60 seconds. Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for at least 1 month. The only exclusion criteria were acute STEMI and cardiogenic shock. Results: Thirty‐three percent of patients were diabetic and 51% presented acutely. Interestingly, 48% had ISR of DES, 54% had ISR in a small vessel, and 29% involved bifurcation lesions. The pattern of ISR was focal in 59% and the most treated artery was the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Angiographic success was 96%. In 2 centers, repeat angiography was performed in 79% and restenosis observed in 6 patients (17.6%). MACE rate at a median of 12 (6–13) months was 16.7% (4.0% cardiac death, 4.0% MI, and 12.0% TLR). There was only 1 probable thombotic event (ARC). As compared with BMS‐ISR, patients with DES‐ISR were more often diabetic (40 vs. 28%) and had more re‐restenosis (TLR 14.8 vs. 9.2%). Conclusion: In a real‐world population, treatment of ISR (including 48% DES‐ISR) with this DEB provides good mid‐term results with 12% TLR at 1 year, especially in ISR pattern IC (9% MACE). (J Interven Cardiol 2011;24:518–528)     

Randomized evaluation of two drug‐eluting stents with identical metallic platform and biodegradable polymer but different agents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared against bare stents: 1‐Year results of the PAINT trial

Objectives: We tested two novel drug‐eluting stents (DES), covered with a biodegradable‐polymer carrier and releasing paclitaxel or sirolimus, which were compared against a bare metal stent (primary objective). The DES differed by the drug, but were identical otherwise, allowing to compare the anti‐restenosis effects of sirolimus versus paclitaxel (secondary objective). Background: The efficacy of novel DES with biodegradable polymers should be tested in the context of randomized trials, even when using drugs known to be effective, such as sirolimus and paclitaxel. Methods: Overall, 274 patients with de novo coronary lesions in native vessels scheduled for stent implantation were randomly assigned (2:2:1 ratio) for the paclitaxel (n = 111), sirolimus (n = 106), or bare metal stent (n = 57) groups. Angiographic follow‐up was obtained at 9 months and major cardiac adverse events up to 12 months. Results: Both paclitaxel and sirolimus stents reduced the 9‐month in‐stent late loss (0.54–0.44 mm, 0.32–0.43 mm, vs. 0.90–0.45 mm respectively), and 1‐year risk of target vessel revascularization and combined major adverse cardiac events (P < 0.05 for both, in all comparisons), compared with controls. Sirolimus stents had lower late loss than paclitaxel stents (P < 0.01), but similar 1‐year clinical outcomes. There were no differences in the risk of death, infarction, or stent thrombosis among the study groups. Conclusion: Both novel DES were effective in reducing neointimal hyperplasia and 1‐year re‐intervention, compared to bare metal stents. Our findings also suggest that sirolimus is more effective than paclitaxel in reducing angiographic neointima, although this effect was not associated with better clinical outcomes.© 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Infrapopliteal drug‐eluting stents for chronic limb ischemia

Objective: We report our experience with the elective placement of below‐knee, drug‐eluting stents in patients with chronic limb ischemia. Background: Infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been associated with a lower rate of procedural success and high rate of restenosis because of the small size of the tibial vessels and the prevalence of calcified and diffuse atherosclerotic disease. Prior published data reports 3‐year patency rates below 25%. Bare metal stents have been reported in bailout situations. Drug‐eluting stents have markedly reduced restenosis compared to bare metal stents in the coronary vasculature, but there is little data supporting the use of these devices below the knee. Methods: Elective placement of drug‐eluting stents in infrapopliteal lesions was performed on 10 patients with severe (≥Fontaine Stage IIb) claudication (n = 1) or limb‐threatening ischemia (n = 9) (rest pain, nonhealing ulcers and gangrene). Results: A total of 17 drug‐eluting stents were electively placed in 12 below‐knee arteries in 10 patients, resulting in an average of 1.7 ± 0.7 stents per patient. The mean lesion length was 24.8 ± 10.9 mm, the mean total stent length was 38.3 ± 19.1 mm, and the mean nominal stent diameter was 2.8 ± 0.3 mm. One patient required target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 3 weeks because of stent thrombosis. TVR was 10% at 12.4 ± 6.5 months of follow‐up. Clinically driven angiography in three different patients was performed at 4, 15, and 16 months and confirmed drug‐eluting stent patency in each case. Conclusions: The use of below‐knee drug‐eluting stents is feasible and appears to be safe in our small series of complex infrapopliteal lesions causing chronic limb ischemia. The occurrence of a single case of stent thrombosis warrants continued observation in this cohort. Prospective clinical trials will be necessary to confirm the benefits and justify the costs of this strategy for treating patients with infrapopliteal culprit lesions and chronic limb ischemia. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Comparison of a polymer‐free rapamycin‐eluting stent (YUKON) with a polymer‐based paclitaxel‐eluting stent (TAXUS) in real‐world coronary artery lesions

Background : In selected patient cohorts the polymer‐free rapamycin‐eluting YUKON stent (A) has demonstrated noninferiority compared with the polymer‐based paclitaxel‐eluting TAXUS stent (B). To test for equivalency in unselected real‐world patients with coronary lesions of various complexities, we retrospectively compared both stent designs. Methods : A total of 410 patients with symptomatic CAD were successfully treated with A (n = 205) or with B (n = 205). Baseline clinical characteristics, coronary lesion location, lesion length, and the number of stents implanted per lesion were equally distributed between the treatment groups. All patients underwent QCA‐analysis at baseline. Clinical follow‐up with assessment of MACE and noncardiac deaths was obtained at 30 days and 6 months. Results : Nominal stent diameter was 2.96 ± 0.38 mm in Group A vs. 3.05 ± 0.42 mm in Group B (P = 0.2); nominal length of stented segmentwas 22.97 ±13.0 mm vs. 23.63 ± 10.0 (P = 0.56). Analysis of MACE after 6 months resulted in one angiographically documented stent thrombosis causing MI in B (0.2%) vs. none in A. No other MI or cardiac deaths occurred in either group, while two noncardiac deaths in A (1.0%) were reported. Fifteen target lesion revascularizations (7.3%) were performed in A vs. 7 (3.4%) in B. Differences in study endpoints at 6 months did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). Conclusions : Up to 6 months after PCI of real‐world coronary lesions, there were no statistically significant differences in MACE between patients treated with the polymer‐free rapamycin‐eluting YUKON stent and the polymer‐based paclitaxel‐eluting TAXUS stent. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.