Human chorionic gonadotrophin luteal support overcomes luteal phase inadequacy after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-induced ovulation in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-induced ovulation after gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation is used to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy in polyfollicular cycles. However, one of the major problems to be resolved is corpus luteum function after follicular maturation and ovulation by mid-cycle GnRHa administration. The present report investigated the luteal phase in non-conceptual polyfollicular cycles in 26 patients (group 1) receiving a single dose of 0.5 mg leuprolide acetate to induce ovulation and in a control group of patients (n = 26) (group 2) who were given human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (10,000 IU i.m.) for ovulation induction. All of them were normal ovulatory women undergoing gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation because of unexplained infertility or male factor. In both groups of patients two doses of 2500 IU HCG i.m. were given 6 and 10 days after the ovulatory dose of HCG or GnRHa to support the luteal phase. All cycles were ovulatory as shown by mid- luteal serum progesterone concentrations >10 ng/ml. Mean serum progesterone concentrations were 62% higher in group 2 than in group 1, but this difference was not statistically significant. The mean length of the luteal phase was similar in groups 1 and 2. It is concluded that HCG luteal support is a useful tool to overcome the luteal phase inadequacy that characterizes GnRHa-triggered cycles after gonadotrophin stimulation.      

A prospective randomized study on oestradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation

A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate theuse of adding oestradiol valerate 6 mg per os daily to intravaginalmicronized progesterone (600 mg daily) as luteal supplements.The study comprised 378 infertile women superovulated with agonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausalgonadotrophins (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or zygoteintra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). The clinical pregnancy ratewas similar (29%) whether or not oestradiol valerate was addedto intravaginal progesterone. Eighteen out of twenty-two endometrialbiopsies were in phase, and morphological evaluations of thetwo luteal supplementation groups were not different. Serumhormone profiles in singleton pregnancies showed a similar dayof appearance of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) in bothprotocols but significantly lower oestradiol concentrationsarose in the group without oestradiol valerate. In 32% of thesingleton pregnancies, the first appearance of HCG occurredlater than day 12 after HCG injection; in those ongoing pregnancies,corpus luteum rescue—as measured by significantly lowerserum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations—was compromised.This study provided no evidence of any benefit of routinelysupplementing GnRHa/HMG cycles with oestradiol valerate in additionto intravaginal micronized progesterone.     

Differential effect of exogenous human chorionic gonadotrophin on progesterone production from normal or malfunctioning corpus luteum

To examine whether luteal phase defect is, in part, causally related to insufficient gonadotrophin stimulation, we compared the relation of the increment of serum progesterone concentrations in response to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) with its basal level at mid-luteal phase. Thirty-eight naturally cycling infertile women aged between 27-41 years old were evaluated for hormonal responses to HCG injection at the mid- luteal phase. We measured luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and progesterone concentrations, before and 1, 2 and 3 h after the administration of HCG (5000 IU, i.m.) 7 days after ovulation verified by ultrasonography. Eleven out of 38 women exhibited progesterone concentrations below 10 ng/ml (low progesterone group), and those remaining showed progesterone concentrations of > or = 10 ng/ml (normal progesterone group). The basal LH, FSH and oestradiol concentrations were essentially the same in both groups. Progesterone concentrations rose significantly 1 h after the injection and levelled off thereafter. The increment of progesterone concentrations at 1 h in the normal progesterone group was 5.7 ng/ml on the average, whereas that in low progesterone group was 1.1 ng/ml. Furthermore, the percentage increase in progesterone concentrations at 1 h in the normal progesterone group was significantly greater than that in the low progesterone group. Both groups equally exhibited significant but marginal increases in oestradiol concentrations 1 h after the injection. LH and FSH concentrations at 3 h decreased significantly in both groups. In summary, HCG readily stimulates progesterone production in normally functioning corpus luteum whereas its stimulatory effect is minimal on malfunctioning corpus luteum. This suggests that luteal phase defect is not caused by inadequate gonadotrophin stimulation and, therefore, does not benefit from HCG administration.      

Endocrinology: Comparison of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and human chorionic gonadotrophin for the induction of ovulation and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a case-control study

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) has been suggestedas an alternative to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) fortriggering ovulation, while preventing ovarian hyperstimulationsyndrome (OHSS). Since a prospective, controlled study wouldbe unethical at this point, we used a retrospective, case-selfcontrol approach to compare GnRHa with HCG in that context.A group of 16 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients who hadsevere OHSS in previous cycles, in which HCG was given to triggerovulation, were studied in subsequent cycles in which GnRHawas used. Each GnRHa cycle (case) was compared to a previousHCG cycle that resulted in OHSS (self control). None of thesesubsequent cydes resulted in severe OHSS. The use of GnRHa didnot affect the number of oocytes retrieved or their quality.Serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of ovulation triggeringwere signilicantly (P<0.01) higher in the GnRHa cycles comparedto HCG cycles. Exogenous progesterone and oestra diol were effectivein maintaining relatively constant serum oestradiol and progesteroneserum concentrations during the luteal phase. Pregnancy rateper cycle was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, theuse of GnRHa to induce ovulation in IVF patients, who are athigh risk for developing OHSS, effectively eliminates this riskwithout affecting other parameters of the stimulation cycle.     

Follicular and luteal phase characteristics following early cessation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are widely used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for the prevention of a premature rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. However, the administration of GnRHa during the follicular phase may also impair subsequent luteal function due to retarded recovery of pituitary gonadotrophin secretion. Therefore, luteal supplementation is generally applied. The present study was designed to determine whether a premature LH surge would still be prevented after early cessation of GnRHa during ovarian stimulation and whether subsequent luteal phase LH production would be sufficient to support progesterone synthesis by the corpus luteum. Sixty patients were randomized for three groups: (i) A long GnRHa/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) protocol with luteal support by repeated human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (n = 20), (ii) early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa without luteal support (n = 20), and (iii) a long GnRHa protocol without luteal support (n = 20). Frequent ultrasound and blood sampling was performed during the entire IVF cycle. Forty normo-ovulatory women served as controls. No premature LH surges were found after early cessation of GnRHa. In this group, some pituitary recovery occurred during the late luteal phase, but this did not affect corpus luteum function. Progesterone concentrations were shown to be dependent on disappearance of the pre-ovulatory bolus of HCG. Pregnancies occurred in all three groups. In conclusion, early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa is still effective in the prevention of a premature rise in LH. Although some pituitary recovery was observed thereafter, corpus luteum function is still abnormal due to early luteolysis.     

Differential effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists administered as desensitizing or flare protocols on hormonal function in the luteal phase of hyperstimulated cycles

The incorporation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) stimulation protocols has led to doubt about the quality of the subsequent luteal phase. The effects of two GnRHa stimulation protocols on luteal phase concentrations of oestradiol (E2), progesterone (P), luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were compared with the standard clomiphene stimulation regimen. Subjects receiving clomiphene with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG, n = 377) showed essentially similar luteal phase P concentrations to those receiving leuprolide acetate/HMG as a desensitization protocol. Subjects receiving concomitant leuprolide and HMG from day 2 to utilize the flare effect of the GnRHa exhibited significantly lower P levels in the luteal phase compared to clomiphene/HMG and leuprolide desensitization protocols despite the addition of HCG support. This occurred despite equivalent E2 concentrations at the time of ovulation and identical numbers of oocytes recovered. LH concentrations in non-conception cycles were suppressed for at least 14 days in the luteal phase in both GnRHa protocols compared to clomiphene stimulation. Differences were less obvious in cycles where conception occurred suggesting that implantation may proceed more favourably when the luteal endocrinology was optimal. It is concluded that flare methods of GnRHa hyperstimulation are associated with significantly different luteal phases compared with clomiphene or desensitization protocols. It is proposed that the use of the flare type of stimulation may significantly influence the response of the granulosa cells to LH or HCG via gonadotrophin receptors or through altered post-receptor function.     

The benefits of mid-luteal addition of human chorionic gonadotrophin in in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol and luteal support with progesterone

Luteal support is essential in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)when long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)is used. Because progesterone lacks luteotrophic stimulation,it seems to be the drug of choice in cases with an increasedrisk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The aim ofthis study was to assess the beneficial effect of the mid-lutealaddition of human choriomc gonadotrophin (HCG) in IVF, usinga down-regulation protocol and luteal support with progesterone,in a prospective randomized study. The study included 170 IVFcycles down-regulated with long-acting GnRHa which were supportedwith 50 mg/day progesterone i.m. during the luteal phase. Patientswere evaluated in the mid-luteal period. Those without clinicalsigns of OHSS, oestradiol concentrations <1000 pg/ml andprogesterone concentrations <50 mg/ml were randomly allocatedto either the addition of 2500 IU HCG (HCG+ group) or no HCG(HCG– group). End luteal phase progesterone concentrationsamong non-pregnant patients were used to assess the contributionof exogenous progesterone and to categorize pregnancies accordingto their corpus luteum function. Similar low OHSS (2.7 and 1.8%)and pregnancy (30 and 29%) rates were observed in the HCG+ andHCG– groups respectively. Of the 26 pregnancies in theHCG+ cases, there was only one case with reduced corpus luteumfunction, compared with 12 of the 25 pregnancies among HCG–patients. Cases with reduced corpus luteum function requiredcontinuous progesterone support and presented lower HCG concentrationsand a higher rate of adverse pregnancy outcome. We concludethat mid-luteal HCG addition does not affect pregnancy rate,but in fact helps to preserve corpus luteum function and avoidsthe need for further supplementation during early pregnancy.     

Endocrinology: Progesterone alone versus progesterone combined with HCG as luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles: a randomized clinical trial

Two different regimens of luteal support in gonadotrophin hormone-releasinghormone (GnRH) analoguefhuman menopausal gonadotrophin (GnRHa/HMG)-inducedin-vitro fertilization cycles (IVF) were compared in a randomizedclinical trial. After embryo transfer, either vaginal progesteronealone was administered (n=89, P group), or a combination ofvaginal progesterone and human chorionic gonadotrophin (n=87,P/HCG group). The primary aim of this study was to assess theeffect of the different regimens of luteal support on the pregnancyrate. The secondary aim was to compare oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations in the luteal phase between the two groups, andassess their effect on the pregnancy rate. A clinical pregnancyrate of 15% was found in the P/HCG group in comparison with26% in the P group (odds ratio 0.49; 99% confidence interval:0.18–1.3). The luteal serum oestradiol and progesteronevalues in the P/HCG group were significantly higher when comparedwith the P group on the 6th, 9th and 12th day after oocyte retrieval(Wilcoxon P<0.001). In accordance with the high oestradiolconcentrations, more cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS) were found in the P/HCG group. Oestradiol values on the9th day after oocyte retrieval, presumably the day of implantation,appeared to be higher in women who did not become clinicallypregnant. We conclude that vaginal progesterone alone providessufficient luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles. Thecombination of vaginal progesterone and HCG as luteal supportleads to significant high luteal oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations. But a high concentration of oestradiol seemsto have a deleterious effect on the implantation process, resultingin a low pregnancy rate.     

Luteal phase support and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

The incidence and statistical associations of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were studied in 304 egg retrievals with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist suppression, gonadotrophin administration and follicular aspiration. In addition to preserving corpus luteum function, the luteal phase administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was associated with a higher incidence of severe OHSS than was supplementation with progesterone alone (12 versus 0%, P less than 0.001). Severe OHSS occurred in 3.7% and 12% of retrievals without and with pregnancy respectively (P less than 0.01). Stepwise logistic regression showed that the occurrence of moderate or severe OHSS was statistically predicted by the log of the serum oestradiol on the day the initial HCG was given (P less than 0.0001), treatment with luteal phase HCG (P less than 0.0003), and fetal number (P less than 0.0079). In the late luteal phase of cycles without luteal HCG, the serum oestradiol concentration was one-tenth and the serum progesterone concentration was one-fifth of the luteal phase value with HCG support (P less than 0.001). Without luteal phase HCG, oestradiol was two-fold higher (P less than 0.001) and progesterone was 1.4-fold higher (P less than 0.005) in pregnant than in non-pregnant women. With luteal phase HCG, oestradiol was 1.4-fold higher in pregnant than in non-pregnant women (P less than 0.05), and progesterone was 1.7-fold higher (P less than 0.001). Oestradiol upper limits of 4400 and 14,700 pmol/l (1200 and 4000 pg/ml) for cycles with and without luteal phase HCG respectively correspond to approximately 5% risk of moderate or severe OHSS with a singleton pregnancy under these conditions.     

Regulation of corpus luteum function

The effects have been studied of different ovulation inductionregimens [either domiphene citrate or buserelin in combinationwith human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)] on the circulatingconcentrations of progesterone, oestradiol, relaxin and humanchorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) during the first trimester ofpregnancy. Ovulation induction with clomiphene resulted in elevatedconcentrations of gonadotrophins in both phases of the cycle,while during ovulation induction with buserelin, gonadotrophinconcentrations were elevated in the follicular phase only. Theconcentrations of all corpus luteum products were greater inclomiphene pregnancies compared with spontaneous pregnancies,but only oestradiol and relaxin concentrations were greaterin clomiphene pregnancies compared with buserelin pregnancies.The concentrations of HCG were significantly reduced in clomiphenepregnancies compared to natural pregnancies. Relaxin concentrationswere significantly higher from 7 weeks gestation in buserelincompared with spontaneous pregnancies, while progesterone, oestradioland HCG concentrations were not consistently different. Consistentassociations were found between relaxin and HCG concentrationsin spontaneous pregnancies and between the concentrations ofrelaxin and both progesterone and oestradiol in pregnanciesachieved after ovulation induction. These data suggest that(i) given the similarity in the circulating concentrations ofHCG, the relatively lower circulating gonadotrophin concentrationsduring the luteal phase of the cycle of conception result inreduced circulating concentrations of oestradiol and relaxin;while in the case of relaxin this effect is partially reversible,there is no evidence that this is so for oestradiol; (ii) synthesisof progesterone in the corpus luteum is less affected by lowerconcentrations of gonadotrophins during the luteal phase; (iii)ovulation induction with clomiphene results in pregnancies withlower concentrations of HCG, suggesting that trophoblast functionmay be impaired; and (iv) corpus luteum function is linked withplacental steroidogenesis.     

Analysis of the bleeding pattern in assisted reproduction cycles with luteal phase supplementation using vaginal micronized progesterone

This study was designed to determine the effects of a vaginal micronized progesterone preparation on bleeding patterns and pregnancy outcomes after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). The study population consisted of 149 consecutive women who had undergone IVF-ICSI using 'long-protocol' stimulation with buserelin-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). A retrospective chart analysis of computerized medical records was undertaken. Vaginal progesterone (200 mg three times daily) was begun the day before oocyte retrieval and continued for a minimum of 16-19 days following human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Occurrence of bleeding following HCG injection, pregnancy rate and outcomes, and serum concentrations of oestradiol were measured. Women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer with ICSI and using vaginal progesterone for luteal support had normal luteal phase lengths (day of HCG minus day of onset of bleeding). In the absence of pregnancy, bleeding occurred after 19.2 +/- 3.9 days (mean +/- SD). Out of the pregnant group only three women bled within 19 days of HCG administration: two had biochemical pregnancies which spontaneously vanished and one evolved to term. The results reflect the normal bleeding pattern to be expected when vaginal progesterone is used for luteal support in IVF and embryo transfer, an approach whose efficacy has been amply proven. No shortened luteal phases were observed using vaginally administered progesterone.     

Endocrinology: Human chorionic gonadotrophin is a better luteal support than progesterone in ultrashort gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist/menotrophin in-vitro fertilization cycles

In an attempt to determine the best luteal support in in-vitrofertilization (IVF) cycles treated with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)by the ultrashort protocol, 60 patients were prospectively randomizedfor either i.m. progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) luteal support. The two groups did not differ in the meannumber of oocytes retrieved and embryos replaced, nor in themean age of the patients and the amount of HMG used. HCG maintainedhigher levels of oestradiol and progesterone during the lutealphase. Conception rate was significantly higher in the HCG group.We conclude that HCG is superior to i.m. progesterone as lutealsupport in IVF cycles in which GnRHa is used in the ultrashortprotocol.     

A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement.

A luteal phase defect has been demonstrated in cycles stimulated using a protocol including a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). We have conducted a randomized prospective study of luteal and early pregnancy supplementation in 262 women selected for in-vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). Either intramuscular progesterone in oil (50 mg/day) or intravaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/day) was used as luteal supplement. In association with oestradiol valerate, progesterone administration was initiated from the day before oocyte retrieval until the 12th week of pregnancy. The implantation rate just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) in favour of the group receiving intravaginal progesterone. In the latter group, we observed a higher clinical pregnancy rate (33.6 versus 26.7%, not significant). Despite lower plasma progesterone levels, a lower first trimester abortion rate (P less than 0.05) was found in the intravaginally treated group. Intravaginal micronized progesterone was well tolerated by all patients and appeared more effective than intramuscular progesterone in improving the implantation rate, and in decreasing the incidence of abortions in stimulated cycles including GnRHa.     

Recovery of corpus luteum function after prolonged deprivation from gonadotrophin stimulation

Three women with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, all desiringpregnancy, participated in a prospective open study attemptingto assess the ability of the human corpus luteum to recoverafter 7 days of deprivation from gonadotrophin stimulation.Follicular growth was induced by gonadotrophins. An endogenousluteinizing hormone (LH) surge was induced by the s.c. injectionof a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist For luteal support,10 mg/day oral medroxyprogesterone acetate were given for 7days, after which a single i.m. injection of human chorionicgonadotrophin (HCG) was administered. Monitoring during thefollicular phase consisted of daily measurements of serum oestradiol,LH and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations, andof follicular growth by trans-vaginal ultrasonography. Duringthe luteal phase, monitoring consisted of measurements of serumconcentrations of LH, FSH, oestradiol, progesterone, 17-hydroxy-progesteroneand -HCG. Ovulation and luteinization occurred in two patients,demonstrated by transient marked increases in serum progesteroneand 117-hydroxy-progesterone concentrations which decreasedto basal pre-ovulatory values and increased again followingthe administration of HCG 7 days later. In the third patient,ovulation and luteinization did not occur, and the subsequentadministration of HCG did not result in an increase in progesteroneconcentration. Of the two patients who ovulated, one conceivedand the second had a luteal phase of 15 days duration. Our preliminaryresults suggest that the human corpus luteum can be ’rescued‘and can function normally after 7 days of deprivation from gonadotrophinstimulation in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism.     

Reducing the dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist on starting ovarian stimulation: effect on ovarian response and in-vitro fertilization outcome

The aim of this study was to examine if lowering the dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) on starting ovarian stimulation could be beneficial in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programmes. A total of 64 normally ovulating patients entering an IVF programme were randomized to receive GnRHa (nafarelin acetate/Synarel) as an intranasal spray commencing in the midluteal phase, either at a dosage of 200 microg three times daily until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration, or to be reduced to 200 microg twice daily as ovarian stimulation was initiated. Patients in both groups were below 35 years with a body mass index below 30. All patients received three ampoules of Metrodin HP per day. Blood samples were taken on the day of HCG administration to measure luteinizing hormone (LH), oestradiol, and progesterone. LH and oestradiol were found to be significantly higher in the lower Synarel dose group. Our results show that reducing the GnRHa dose during ovarian stimulation in IVF might be beneficial in terms of significantly more oocytes recovered, and significantly greater number of embryos available for transfer and freezing, with no incidence of premature luteinization.      

Analysis of hormonal changes during combined buserelin/HMG treatment

Changes of serum oestradiol, LH and progesterone have been analysed in view of the effect of the GnRH analogue buserelin on the late follicular and early luteal phase of cycles stimulated with combined buserelin/HMG (n = 31) in an IVF-ET/GIFT programme. Patients undergoing cycles with HMG only (n = 57) served as the control group. With the use of the GnRH analogue buserelin, a significantly higher amount of HMG (25 versus 20 ampoules; P less than 0.001) for a significantly longer stimulation period (10 versus 8 days; P less than 0.001) was necessary to achieve the same oestradiol response as seen in HMG cycles. Serum progesterone levels during a three day period before ovulation induction tended to be lower in the combined buserelin/HMG cycles than in cycles with HMG stimulation only. We did not observe any significant difference in the luteal phase progesterone levels of the buserelin/HMG and the HMG group. On the other hand, we found that an inadequate luteal phase in buserelin/HMG cycles could be avoided by HCG administration during the luteal phase. Both the elevation of basal serum LH and a premature LH rise could also be avoided by the use of buserelin.     

Luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization using gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue before ovarian stimulation: a prospective randomized study of human chorionic gonadotrophin versus intramuscular progesterone.

This study was conducted to compare the endocrine milieu and pregnancy rates in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) programme employing a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) when either human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or progesterone were used for luteal phase support. A total of 121 IVF-ET treatment cycles were prospectively studied. All patients started leuprolide acetate in the midluteal phase and it was continued for at least 10 days. When oestradiol levels were less than 150 pmol/l, HMG was started. When at least three follicles were greater than or equal to 17 mm in diameter, HCG 5000 IU i.m. was given. Oocytes were retrieved using transvaginal ultrasound and embryos were transferred 48 h later. The patients' cycles were prospectively randomized to receive HCG (72 cycles) or progesterone (49 cycles) luteal support. The HCG group received 1500 IU i.m. on days 3, 6 and 9 after the initial trigger. The progesterone group received 12.5 mg i.m. q.d. starting from the day after the HCG trigger. The dose of progesterone was increased to 25 mg i.m. q.d. starting on the day of embryo transfer and continued for 17-21 days. If the patient became pregnant, this dose of progesterone was continued until fetal heart activity was visualized by ultrasound. Mean ages, number of eggs retrieved, embryos transferred, oestradiol levels on the day of the HCG trigger, oestradiol and progesterone at the time of embryo transfer were the same in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ratio of oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration to mid-luteal oestradiol concentration is predictive of in-vitro fertilization outcome.

The role of luteal oestradiol for successful implantation in humans seems to be permissive rather than obligatory. Few studies have attempted to clarify the role of early luteal oestradiol in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome, whether peri-implantation oestradiol is predictive of successful IVF outcome. We retrospectively analysed 106 women undergoing 106 IVF/embryo transfer cycles. Only the first treatment cycle per patient was analysed. Peak oestradiol denoted the concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Mid-luteal oestradiol was obtained 3 days after embryo transfer (8 days after HCG administration). A total of 44 pregnancies were noted (41.51%). There were no differences in age, cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), peak oestradiol, number of retrieved oocytes, number of embryo transfers, and mid-luteal oestradiol between pregnant and non-pregnant women. However, the ratio of day of HCG oestradiol to mid-luteal oestradiol was highly predictive of successful outcome: the ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate (sacs with fetal heart beat/embryo transfer) were 15.8 and 5.7% respectively if the above ratio exceeded 5.0 (n = 19), compared to 42.1 and 16.3%, and 53.3 and 26. 5% if the ratio was between 0.4 and 2.5 (n = 57), and between 2.5 and 5.0 (n = 30) respectively. Our study suggests that the magnitude of decline in oestradiol concentrations after oocyte retrieval may be important in predicting IVF success. We postulate that endometrial integrity may become compromised when a dramatic drop in oestradiol occurs by the mid-luteal period. Whether these women benefit from oestradiol supplementation after oocyte retrieval remains to be investigated.     

Suppression of prolactin secretion during ovarian hyperstimulation is followed by elevated serum levels of endometrial protein PP14 in the late luteal phase

A double-blind placebo-controlled study on bromocriptine administrationduring days 2-12 of ovarian hyperstimulation for in-vitrofertilization(IVF) showed that, in bromocriptine cycles, levels of the endometrialprotein PP14 were higher in the late luteal phase. This wasverified both by calculating forward from the day of human chorionicgonadotrophin (HCG) administration and backward from the onsetof the next period. Bromocriptine had no effect on IVF performance.During bromocriptine treatment the serum prolactin levels declinedand serum oestradiol levels were higher on day 9 of the cycle.There was a positive correlation (r =0.55; P = 0.012) betweenthe serum oestradiol levels on day 9 and the PP14 levels ondays 22-23 of the cycle. No difference was found in the lutealphase progesterone levels between bromocriptine-and placebo-treatedcycles. These results suggest that low prolactin and/or highoestradiol levels during the follicular phase have an influenceon the subsequent secretory capacity of the endometrium as reflectedby secretion of a specific endometrial protein     

Endocrinology: Luteal function following ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome patients using exogenous gonadotrophins in combination with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist

The luteal phase was studied in 12 polycystic ovary syndrome(PCOS) patients following ovulation induction using exogenousgonadotrophins combined with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist (GnRH-a). Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was precededby 3 weeks of treatment with GnRH-a (buserelin; 1200 µg/dayintra-nasally) and administered in a step-down dose regimenstarting with 225 IU/day i.m. GnRH-a was withheld the day beforeadministration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10 000IU i.m.). Blood sampling and ultrasound monitoring was performedevery 2–3 days until menses. The luteal phase was significantlyshorter in PCOS patients as compared to eight regularly cyclingcontrols: 8.8 (3.3–11.4) days [median(range)] versus 12.8(8.9–15.9) days (P = 0.01). Median peak values for progesteronedid not show significant differences comparing both groups:52.3 (17.1–510.3) nmol/l versus 43.0 (31.2–71.1)nmol/l, respectively (P = 0.8). The interval between the dayof the progesterone peak and return to baseline was significantlyshorter in the PCOS patients than in controls: 2.5 (0.3–4.9)days versus 4.2 (3.9–10.5) days (P < 0.005). Luteinizinghormone (LH) concentrations during the luteal phase as reflectedby area under the curve were significantly lower in PCOS ascompared to controls: 4.4 (1.6–21.0) IU/l x days and 49.0(27.8–79.6) IU/l x days, respectively (P < 0.001).In conclusion, patients with PCOS may suffer from insufficientluteal phases after ovulation induction using HMG/HCG in combinationwith a GnRH-a. The corpus luteum apparently lacks the supportof endogenous LH and may be stimulated only by the pre-ovulatoryinjection of HCG. Potential involvement of adjuvant GnRH-a medicationor HCG itself in luteal suppression of endogenous gonadotrophinsecretion, and the importance of luteal function for pregnancyrates following treatment, warrant further studies.