Efficiency of various serological techniques for diagnosing Coxiella burnetii infection

An indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using a recently developed commercial kit for detecting antibodies against Coxiella burnetii (C.b.), the etiological agent of Q fever, has been evaluated using human field serum samples. The IFA was compared with an ELISA and a complement fixation test (CFT). The IFA was based on the corpuscular C.b. phase I and phase II antigens specific to anti-C.b. phase I and II antibodies, respectively. Fifty sera from persons with symptoms of Q fever were examined in this study. The IFA compared with the ELISA showed the sensitivities of 97.7% and 87.2% for IgG and 66.7% and 60.0% for IgM phase II and I antibodies, respectively and the specificities of 100% and 90.0% for IgG and 75.9% and 64.7% for IgM phase II and phase I antibodies, respectively. Due to a limited number of sera positive in the IgA antibody testing, the data presented should be considered with caution. It appears that the IFA strikes a very good balance between high specificity and sensitivity with phase II and phase I IgG antibodies and a less satisfactory one with IgM antibodies. The CFT failed in one of the above aspects showing a good specificity but a poor sensitivity, especially for phase I antibodies. The study demonstrated that the IFA is suitable for diagnosing Q fever and its therapeutic follow-up and is a good candidate for screening sera in large numbers. A certain limitation, especially in testing early stages of the chronic disease, could be a low fluorescence intensity of the IgA positive control in comparison with the IgA negative one.     

Evaluation of Commonly Used Serological Tests for Detection of Coxiella burnetii Antibodies in Well-Defined Acute and Follow-Up Sera

In this study, we compared Coxiella burnetii IgG phase I, IgG phase II, and IgM phase II detection among a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Virion/Serion), an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) (Focus Diagnostics), and a complement fixation test (CFT) (Virion/Serion). For this, we used a unique collection of acute- and convalescent-phase sera from 126 patients with acute Q fever diagnosed by positive Coxiella burnetii PCR of blood. We were able to establish a reliable date of onset of disease, since DNA is detectable within 2 weeks after the start of symptoms. In acute samples, at t = 0, IFAT demonstrated IgM phase II antibodies in significantly more sera than did ELISA (31.8% versus 19.7%), although the portion of solitary IgM phase II was equal for IFAT and for ELISA (18.2% and 16.7%, respectively). Twelve months after the diagnosis of acute Q fever, 83.5% and 62.2% of the sera were still positive for IgM phase II with IFAT and ELISA, respectively. At 12 months IFAT IgG phase II showed the slowest decline. Therefore, definitive serological evidence of acute Q fever cannot be based on a single serum sample in areas of epidemicity and should involve measurement of both IgM and IgG antibodies in paired serum. Based on IgG phase II antibody detection in paired samples (at 0 and 3 months) from 62 patients, IFAT confirmed more cases than ELISA and CFT, but the differences were not statically significant (100% for IFAT, 95.2% for ELISA, and 96.8% for CFT). This study demonstrated that the three serological tests are equally effective in diagnosing acute Q fever within 3 months of start of symptoms. In follow-up sera, more IgG antibodies were detected by IFAT than by ELISA or CFT, making IFAT more suitable for prevaccination screening programs.     

Immuno-PCR for the early serological diagnosis of acute infectious diseases: the Q fever paradigm

To reduce the delay in diagnosis of Q fever, we have adapted the ultrasensitive immuno-PCR method for the detection of Phase II IgM anti-Coxiella burnetii. We compared its performance to ELISA, IFA and PCR using 31 acute Q fever sera and 50 control sera. The best sensitivity was obtained by iPCR (27 out of 31) followed by PCR (18 out of 31), ELISA (12 out of 31) and IFA (10 out of 31). A specificity of 92% was found by iPCR (3 false positive out of 40), 92% for ELISA (3 false positive out of 40) whereas PCR and IFA exhibited a specificity of 100%. Among the 31 Q fever sera, we compared the four methods for the detection of the early sera sampled during the two first weeks after the onset of symptoms and found a sensitivity of 90% by iPCR, 55% for PCR, 35% for ELISA and 25% for IFA. The results presented in this study suggest that iPCR is a promising, sensitive and specific method that can be used for the early diagnosis of acute Q fever and more generally for acute infections where traditional methods lack sensitivity.     

Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Acute Q Fever Do Not Prohibit IgG Antibody Responses to Coxiella burnetii

Little is known about the effect of timing of antibiotic treatment on development of IgG antibodies following acute Q fever. We studied IgG antibody responses in symptomatic patients diagnosed either before or during development of the serologic response to Coxiella burnetii. Between 15 and 31 May 2009, 186 patients presented with acute Q fever, of which 181 were included in this retrospective study: 91 early-diagnosed (ED) acute Q fever patients, defined as negative IgM phase II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and positive PCR, and 90 late-diagnosed (LD) acute Q fever patients, defined as positive/dubious IgM phase II ELISA and positive immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Follow-up serology at 3, 6, and 12 months was performed using IFA (IgG phase I and II). High IgG antibody titers were defined as IgG phase II titers of ≥1:1,024 together with IgG phase I titers of ≥1:256. At 12 months, 28.6% of ED patients and 19.5% of LD patients had high IgG antibody titers (P = 0.17). No statistically significant differences were found in frequencies of IgG phase I and IgG phase II antibody titers at all follow-up appointments for adequately and inadequately treated patients overall, as well as for ED and LD patients analyzed separately. Additionally, no significant difference was found in frequencies of high antibody titers and between early (treatment started within 7 days after seeking medical attention) and late timing of treatment. This study indicates that early diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute Q fever do not prohibit development of the IgG antibody response.     

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of chronic Q fever.

From 1982 through 1987 we diagnosed 13 chronic Q fever cases. Clinically these patients presented a culture-negative endocarditis, and all but two had high complement-fixing antibody titers to Coxiella burnetii phase I (reciprocal titer above 200). With the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), titers of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to phases I and II of C. burnetii averaged 158,000 and 69,900, respectively, whereas they reached 300 and 3,200 in acute Q fever cases. Similarly, IgA to both phases of C. burnetii and IgM to phase I were consistently higher during chronic than acute Q fever. The serological follow-up of one patient with chronic Q fever over a 4-year period showed a good correlation between the titers of IgG and IgM antibody titers detected by ELISA and indirect fluorescent-antibody test (IFA) to both phases of C. burnetii. Few discrepancies appeared with IgA. Shortly after initiation of antibiotic treatment, a slow and steady decrease of the antibody titers to C. burnetii phases I and II was observed. The complement fixation, IFA, and ELISA tests showed the same type of antibody response. The ELISA proved to be an excellent diagnostic test for chronic Q fever. It distinguished negative from positive reactions clearly, and results were highly reproducible. The reading is objective, and the test is simple to perform and more sensitive than the IFA and complement fixation tests. The ELISA is recommended for serologic evaluation of patients with chronic Q fever.     

Q fever endocarditis: diagnostic approaches and monitoring of therapeutic effects

Summary The scope of current diagnostic methods for Q fever endocarditis includes serology, direct demonstration of Coxiella burnetii in the resected heart valve tissue, and animal inoculation studies. Illustrated by a clinical case report, the different methods are presented and discussed. Serology represents the primary method, using the techniques of complement fixation, indirect immunofluorescence, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The latter two techniques allow the detection of immunoglobulins G, M, and A to the phase I and II antigens of C. burnetii. After cardiac surgery, we visualized C. burnetii on smears and specifically stained it on histologic sections of the resected heart valve by light and electron microscopic immunohistochemistry. In addition, seroconversion in animals after inoculation with valve specimens confirmed the presence of C. burnetii in the heart valve. The antibody titers determined by ELISA correlated well with the patient's clinical course during the treatment period. Therefore it is suggested that its usefulness for monitoring the efficacy of antimicrobial agents in patients with Q fever endocarditis should be further evaluated.Abbreviations IFA indirect fluorescent antibody test - ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - CF complement fixation - TMP/SMX trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole - CDC Center for Disease Control - PAP peroxidase-antiperoxidase - PBS phosphate-buffered saline     

Comparison of immunofluorescence with enzyme immunoassay for detection of Q fever

To evaluate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) as an alternative to indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) to screen for Q fever in humans, 157 serum samples from patients suspected of having the disease were tested for immunoglobulin G antibodies toCoxiella burnetii. The agreement between the tests and the sensitivity of EIA were excellent (96.8% and 98.4%, respectively) when an IFAtiter of > 1/160 was considered positive. All serum samples with a titer of > 1/320 in the IFA were also positive by the EIA. The EIA seems to be an acceptable alternative to IFA for screening for Q fever.     

Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for serodiagnosis of acute Q fever

An enzyme immunoassay was validated for the serodiagnosis of acute Q fever. Minimum positive tests were determined for both serial dilutions and a single dilution of patient sera. To establish the specificity of the test, 152 serum samples were tested from individuals with no evidence of pastCoxiella burnetii infection. Diagnostic titers were set at 128 for the IgM and IgG responses to phase I, at 512 for the IgM response to phase II and at 1,024 for the IgG response to phase IICoxiella burnetii. These titers gave a falsepositive rate of 1 %. Alternatively, testing a single dilution of sera (1:128) gave specificities ranging from 97.3 to 98.7 %. Tests with the greatest sensitivities, using serially diluted early convalescent-phase sera, were the IgM (84 %) and IgG (80 %) responses to phase IICoxiella burnetii. At a single serum dilution, 92 % of early convalescent sera had a positive IgG response to phase IICoxiella burnetii. With a high specificity and good sensitivity, the EIA can be used to diagnose acute Q fever with a single convalescent serum specimen. The duration of a positive response was greater than five years.     

High Coxiella burnetii DNA Load in Serum during Acute Q Fever Is Associated with Progression to a Serologic Profile Indicative of Chronic Q Fever

PCR is very effective in diagnosing acute Q fever in the early stages of infection, when bacterial DNA is present in the bloodstream but antibodies have not yet developed. The objective of this study was to further analyze the diagnostic value of semiquantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in diagnosing acute Q fever in an outbreak situation. At the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, in 2009, qPCR testing for Coxiella burnetii DNA was performed for 2,715 patients suspected of having acute Q fever (positive, n = 385; negative, n = 2,330). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the qPCR assay were calculated for patients with negative qPCR results with a follow-up sample obtained within 14 days (n = 305) and qPCR-positive patients with at least one follow-up sample (n = 369). The correctness of the qPCR result was based on immunofluorescence assay results for samples submitted for qPCR and follow-up testing. The sensitivity of the Q fever qPCR assay was 92.2%, specificity 98.9%, PPV 99.2%, and NPV 89.8%. Patients who later developed serologic profiles indicative of chronic Q fever infection had significantly higher C. burnetii DNA loads during the acute phase than did patients who did not (P < 0.001). qPCR testing is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of acute Q fever and should be used in outbreak situations when the onset of symptoms is <15 days earlier. Special attention is needed in the follow-up monitoring of patients with high C. burnetii DNA loads during the acute phase, as this might be an indicator for the development of a serologic profile indicative of chronic infection.     

Detection of phase I IgG antibodies to Coxiella burnetii with EIA as a screening test for blood donations

The presence of a high phase I IgG antibody titre may indicate chronic infection and a risk for the transmission of Coxiella burnetii through blood transfusion. The outbreak of Q fever in the Netherlands allowed for the comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the reference immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in a large group of individuals one year after acute Q fever. EIA is 100?% sensitive in detecting high (≥1:1,024) phase I IgG antibody titres. The cost of screening with EIA and confirming all EIA-positive results with IFA is much lower than screening all donations with IFA. This should be taken into account in cost-effectiveness analyses of screening programmes.     

Diagnostic Performance of Serological Tests to Detect Antibodies Against Acute Scrub Typhus Infection in Central India

Background: Differentiating scrub typhus from other acute febrile illness is difficult due to non specificity of clinical symptoms and relative absence of eschar in Indian population. The diagnosis thus relies mainly on laboratory tests. Antibody based serological tests are mainstay of scrub typhus diagnosis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of IgM ELISA, IgM IFA and ICT to detect antibodies against O. tsutsugamushi in acute serum of febrile patients. Methodology: The serum samples from 600 randomly selected patients suffering from acute undifferentiated fever were tested by all the three tests mentioned above. We used latent class analysis to generate unbiased results as all the tests for scrub typhus diagnosis are imperfect and none of them can be considered as reference standard. Results: We found that IgM ELISA with cutoff titer 0.5 OD has high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 99.9% and specificity 99.15) than IgM IFA (sensitivity 96.8% and specificity 99.7%) for scrub typhus diagnosis. ICT used in our study had very high specificity 100% but low sensitivity (38%) which would limit its use for acute serum samples. ICT being a screening or point of care test, has to be more sensitive while some compromise with specificity is affordable. Hence, optimal cutoff for ICT should be evaluated under different settings. Conclusion: IgM ELISA being simple and affordable could be an alternative diagnostic test to IgM IFA which is subjective and costly.     

Comparison of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with immunofluorescence and complement fixation tests for detection of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) immunoglobulin M

A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of Q fever (PanBio Coxiella burnetii immunoglobulin M [IgM] ELISA, QFM-200) was compared to the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) for C. burnetii IgM and the complement fixation test (CFT). The ELISA demonstrated 92% agreement with the reference method (IFAT), and gave a sensitivity of 99% (69 of 70 samples) and a specificity of 88% (106 of 121). Specificity can be increased with confirmation by IFAT. CFT was found to have a specificity of 90% (107 of 119), although it was lacking in sensitivity (73%; 51 of 70). No cross-reactivity was observed in the ELISA with serum samples from patients with mycoplasma (n = 6), chlamydia (n = 5), or legionella (n = 4) infections, although 2 of 5 patients with leptospirosis and 1 of 4 samples containing rheumatoid factor (RF) demonstrated positive results in the ELISA. Results indicate that the performance of the PanBio C. burnetii (Q fever) IgM ELISA (F = 187) is superior to that of CFT (F = 163), and consequently the ELISA should be a useful aid in the diagnosis of acute Q fever.     

New criteria for immunofluorescence assay for Q fever diagnosis in Japan

A study was made to evaluate the cutoff value of indirect immunofluorescent-antibody (IFA) test for Q fever diagnosis in Japan. We used 346 sera, including 16 from confirmed Q fever cases, 304 from Japanese pneumonia patients, and 26 from negative cases. Thirteen sera from the confirmed Q fever cases with an immunoglobulin M (IgM) titer of > or =1:128 and/or IgG titer of > or =1:256 by the IFA test were positive by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting assay (WBA), whereas 298 sera from pneumonia patients and 26 negative sera with an IgM titer of < or =1:16 and an IgG titer of < or =1:32 by the IFA test were negative by both ELISA and WBA. In the proposed "equivocal area," with an IgM titer of > or =1:32 and < or =1:64 and/or an IgG titer of > or =1:64 and < or =1:128, we found 9 sera, 3 from confirmed Q fever cases and 6 from Japanese pneumonia patients, by the IFA test. Three sera from the confirmed Q fever cases and one of the sera from pneumonia patients were IgM and/or IgG positive by both ELISA and WBA. These results suggest that a single cutoff value for the IFA test may cause false-positive and false-negative results. In conclusion, this study showed that an "equivocal area" should be used for the IFA test rather than a single cutoff value and that sera in the equivocal area should be tested by additional serological assays for confirmation.     

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and complement fixation and indirect fluorescent-antibody tests for detection of Coxiella burnetii antibody.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to detect immunoglobulin G to Coxiella burnetii phase II. Serum samples from 213 patients who had had Q fever 1 year previously and from 301 blood donors from six localities in Switzerland were tested by ELISA and by indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) and complement fixation (CF) tests. The ELISA and the IFA and CF tests detected antibody to C. burnetii in 202 (94.8%), 193 (90.6%), and 166 (77.8%) of the 213 Q fever patients, respectively. With the serum samples from blood donors, the ELISA yielded a higher percentage of positive sera than did the IFA and CF tests. The high specificity of the three tests was confirmed by analyzing paired serum samples from 36 patients suffering from acute pneumonia of viral or bacterial origin. In these cases, the serological results were negative by the three tests, except for three Q-fever cases included as positive control.     

Microbiological Challenges in the Diagnosis of Chronic Q Fever

Diagnosis of chronic Q fever is difficult. PCR and culture lack sensitivity; hence, diagnosis relies mainly on serologic tests using an immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Optimal phase I IgG cutoff titers are debated but are estimated to be between 1:800 and 1:1,600. In patients with proven, probable, or possible chronic Q fever, we studied phase I IgG antibody titers at the time of positive blood PCR, at diagnosis, and at peak levels during chronic Q fever. We evaluated 200 patients, of whom 93 (46.5%) had proven, 51 (25.5%) had probable, and 56 (28.0%) had possible chronic Q fever. Sixty-five percent of proven cases had positive Coxiella burnetii PCR results for blood, which was associated with high phase I IgG. Median phase I IgG titers at diagnosis and peak titers in patients with proven chronic Q fever were significantly higher than those for patients with probable and possible chronic Q fever. The positive predictive values for proven chronic Q fever, compared to possible chronic Q fever, at titers 1:1,024, 1:2,048, 1:4,096, and ≥1:8,192 were 62.2%, 66.7%, 76.5%, and ≥86.2%, respectively. However, sensitivity dropped to <60% when cutoff titers of ≥1:8,192 were used. Although our study demonstrated a strong association between high phase I IgG titers and proven chronic Q fever, increasing the current diagnostic phase I IgG cutoff to >1:1,024 is not recommended due to increased false-negative findings (sensitivity < 60%) and the high morbidity and mortality of untreated chronic Q fever. Our study emphasizes that serologic results are not diagnostic on their own but should always be interpreted in combination with clinical parameters.     

Combined determination of Coxiella burnetii-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgA improves specificity in the diagnosis of acute Q fever.

Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgA responses in patients with acute Q fever were compared by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. An increase in both IgM and IgA was observed in paired sera from all 19 patients with acute Q fever, and both IgM and IgA levels showed good correlation with complement fixation test titers. Paired sera from 23 patients with infections other than Q fever were also tested. IgM levels were elevated in three of these patients, while IgA levels were elevated in three different patients (87% specificity for either IgM or IgA). As no patients in the disease control group showed elevated levels of both IgM and IgA, definition of a positive result as elevated levels of both IgM and IgA improved specificity to 100% without a decrease in sensitivity. This study indicates that detection of specific IgA is a useful adjunct to that of IgM in the diagnosis of acute Q fever.     

Real-Time PCR with Serum Samples Is Indispensable for Early Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever

The world''s largest Q fever outbreak is ongoing in The Netherlands with around 3,000 confirmed cases since the first half of 2007. Increased awareness has resulted in early referral of patients for diagnostics. An important drawback to serological diagnosis of acute Q fever is the lag phase in antibody response. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of a real-time PCR for detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA using serum samples from patients with acute Q fever. PCR, targeting IS1111, was retrospectively performed on acute-phase and follow-up convalescent-phase serum samples from 65 patients with acute Q fever as diagnosed by immunofluorescence assay. The results obtained by PCR were related to disease stage as defined by subsequent appearance of phase II IgM, phase II IgG, phase I IgM, and phase I IgG (IgM-II, IgG-II, IgM-I, and IgG-I, respectively) antibodies and time since onset of disease. In addition, we analyzed seronegative acute-phase serum samples from patients with inconclusive Q fever serology, because no convalescent-phase serum samples were available. PCR was scored positive in 49/50 (98%) seronegative sera, 9/10 (90%) sera with isolated IgM-II antibodies, 3/13 (23%) sera with IgM-II/IgG-II antibodies, 2/41 (5%) sera with IgM-II/IgG-II/IgM-I antibodies, 0/15 (0%) sera with IgM-II/IgG-II/IgM-I/IgG-I antibodies, and 0/1 (0%) serum sample with IgM-II/IgG-II/IgG-I antibodies. The latest time point after onset of disease in which C. burnetii DNA could be detected was at day 17. In patients with inconclusive Q fever serology, PCR was positive in 5/50 (10%) cases. We conclude that real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. C. burnetii DNA becomes undetectable in serum as the serological response develops.Q fever, an infection caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii, results in a self-limiting disease in 40 to 50% of infected cases. Pneumonia is the predominant presenting symptom in acute Q fever, although fever and hepatitis are also frequently observed (9, 10). Failure to diagnose acute Q fever and delay in treatment may lead to prolonged morbidity and increased hospital admission rates (4, 7, 11, 14).During three consecutive years, large Q fever epidemics occurred in an area in the south of The Netherlands where the disease was formerly not prevalent (11). In 2007 there were a total of 191 confirmed cases reported, in 2008 a total of 998, and in 2009 more than 2,000 confirmed cases were reported, which ranks the outbreak as the largest Q fever epidemic recorded to date. The affected area has a large density of dairy goats, of which a number have tested positive for Q fever. Next to the differences in sizes of the epidemics, the interval between onset of disease and date of diagnosis decreased from a median of 77 days in 2007 to 29 days in 2008 and 17 days in 2009 (12). Moreover, the hospital admission rates were reduced from 40% in 2007 to 20% in 2008 (11). Both observations are most likely due to increased awareness among physicians in the affected area resulting in early submission of clinical samples to the laboratory, subsequent earlier diagnosis, and probably fewer undiagnosed cases. The majority of diagnostic samples from both epidemics were submitted to our laboratory, which lies in the center of the epidemic area and serves a catchment area of roughly 500,000 persons in a semirural district supporting two hospitals and surrounding general practitioners.The gold standard for serological diagnosis of an infectious disease is either a seroconversion or a 4-fold rise in antibody titer. The reference test for serological diagnosis of Q fever is the immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (8). Antibodies are expressed against phase II antigens during the acute infection and against phase I antigens in the established infection. For both antigens, IgM antibody production precedes IgG production, and thus three phases can be distinguished in acute Q fever: a seronegative phase followed by IgM/IgG phase II seroconversion during the acute infection and subsequent IgM/IgG phase I seroconversion in the established infection. However, an important drawback to serological diagnosis of acute Q fever is the lag phase in antibody response of 7 to 15 days after onset of clinical symptoms (8).Apart from serology, C. burnetii-specific PCR of serum samples can be an additional tool to diagnose Q fever in the early acute phase, but conflicting sensitivities have been reported (3, 13). Here, we evaluated the performance of an in-house-developed real-time PCR assay for detection of C. burnetii DNA in serum samples from patients with acute Q fever.     

Evaluation of Vircell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect immunofluorescence assay for detection of antibodies against Legionella pneumophila

We evaluated the abilities of the Vircell immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, the IgM and IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, and the IgM-plus-IgG ELISA for Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6 to diagnose Legionnaires' disease (LD) in a well-described sample of patients with and without LD. Also, we determined the agreements, sensitivities, and specificities of the different Vircell assays in comparison to a validated ELISA (Serion classic ELISA). Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 74.6% and 96.6%, respectively, for the IgM IFA, 65.1% and 88.0% for the IgG IFA, 92.3% and 100% for the IgM ELISA, 43.3% and 96.6% for the IgG ELISA, and 90.8% and 100% for the IgM-plus-IgG ELISA. Compared to Serion classic ELISA, agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were 80.0%, 83.1%, and 78.4%, respectively, for the IgM IFA, 75.2%, 66.0%, and 79.5% for the IgG IFA, 89.5%, 82.0%, and 97.6% for the IgM ELISA, 81.9%, 88.9%, and 78.0% for the IgG ELISA, and 93.5%, 90.0%, and 96.6% for the IgM-plus-IgG ELISA. The value of a positive diagnostic result obtained by the Vircell IgM IFA, the Vircell IgG IFA, and the Vircell IgG ELISA might not be acceptable for a diagnostic assay. Both the high specificities and sensitivities of the Vircell IgM ELISA and the IgM-plus-IgG ELISA and the high correlation with the Serion classic ELISA indicate that they are useful in the diagnosis of LD.     

Immunoglobulin M (IgM)-glycoinositolphospholipid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: an immunoenzymatic assay for discrimination between patients with acute toxoplasmosis and those with persistent parasite-specific IgM antibodies

In the present study we developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure immunoglobulin M (IgM) specific for glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPL) derived from tachyzoite membrane (IgM-GIPL ELISA). The sensitivity and specificity of the assay were compared with those of commercially available Toxoplasma-specific IgM serological tests, namely, immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with fixed tachyzoites and capture ELISA employing tachyzoite extracts. Our results show that all patients with acute toxoplasmosis, as determined by clinical data and conventional serological tests, were also positive by the IgM-GIPL ELISA. Interestingly, many patients that were classified as indeterminate, who had IgG with high avidity but positive results in the IgM-specific IFA and capture ELISA, were negative by the IgM-GIPL ELISA. Finally, we tested the sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and various parasitic infections and found no evidence of false positives in the IgM-GIPL ELISA.     

Serology in chronic Q fever is still surrounded by question marks

Detection of antibodies using immunofluoresence tests (IFAT) is recommended for diagnosis of chronic Q fever, but other commercial antibody assays are also available. We compared an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Virion/Serion) and a complement fixation test (CFT) (Virion/Serion) for the detection of Coxiella burnetii IgG phase I and IgA phase I in early- and follow-up serum samples from patients with chronic Q fever, diagnosed according to an algorithm that involves IFAT. For this, we tested sera of 49 patients, including 30 proven, 14 probable and five possible chronic Q fever cases. Sensitivity of CFT for diagnosis of chronic Q fever was suboptimal (85 %), as eight patients, including five with chronic Q fever, tested negative at time of diagnosis, whereas IgG phase I antibodies were detected in these five patients by ELISA. Sensitivity of ELISA was higher, although three probable patients were missed. No differences in ELISA IgA phase I detection between proven chronic Q fever and probable were observed; instead possible patients were in majority IgA negative (60 %). Serological examination using ELISA and CFT in follow-up sera from 26 patients on treatment was unsatisfactory. Like IFAT, all kinetic options were possible: decreasing, remaining stable or even increase during time. This study demonstrated that the sensitivity of CFT-based phase I antibody detection is low and therefore not recommended for diagnosis of chronic Q fever. Based on our results, serological follow-up to guide treatment decisions was of limited value.