Association of coeliac disease with primary biliary cirrhosis in Poland

OBJECTIVES: In western and northern but not southern Europe, the prevalence of coeliac disease among patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is higher than in the general population. We analysed the prevalence of coeliac disease among patients with PBC in Poland, a central European country. METHODS: In 115 patients with PBC, immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies against guinea-pig tissue transglutaminase (tTGA), monkey endomysium (EMA) and gliadin (AGA) were determined. In patients positive for tTGA and/or EMA, the DNA typing of HLA-DQB gene and small-bowel biopsy were performed. RESULTS: IgA EMA was found in one patient with PBC (0.9%, 95% CI 0-2.5%). tTGA was detected in seven patients (6%, 95% CI 1.8-10.3%). Small-bowel biopsy showed flat mucosa in one subject, who was EMA positive/tTGA negative/AGA negative, and normal histology in four tTGA-positive/EMA-negative patients. In the latter four patients, the positive tTGA result was caused by IgA reactivity to proteins other than transglutaminase. Prevalence of coeliac disease in our 115 patients with PBC was 0.9% (95% CI 0-1.9%). In one patient with silent coeliac disease presenting with the HLA-DQ2 allele, introduction of a gluten-free diet was followed by improvement in liver function tests, improvement in histology of the distal duodenum, and disappearance of EMA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results from Poland do not confirm a high prevalence of coeliac disease in PBC patients. Guinea-pig liver transglutaminase immunolinked assay cannot be used as a screening test for coeliac disease in PBC patients. A gluten-free diet may be helpful in restoration of liver function in patients with such an association.     

IgA anti-actin antibodies ELISA in coeliac disease: A multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that serum anti-actin antibodies are a reliable marker of intestinal damage severity in coeliac disease. AIMS: To validate in a multicentre study the clinical usefulness of serum IgA anti-actin antibody ELISA and its possible use in monitoring intestinal mucosa lesions during gluten-free diet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four centres recruited 205 newly diagnosed coeliac disease patients with villous atrophy, 80 healthy controls and 81 "disease" controls. Twelve coeliac disease patients on gluten-free diet but with persistent symptoms underwent serum IgA anti-actin antibody assay and intestinal histology evaluation. IgA anti-actin antibody ELISA was performed with a commercial kit. All coeliac disease patients underwent intestinal histology study. RESULTS: IgA anti-actin antibodies showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 85% in the diagnosis of coeliac disease patients with villous atrophy. The area under the receiving operator curve for anti-actin antibodies was 0.873 [95% C.I. 0.805-0.899]. Serum anti-actin antibodies values were significantly higher in coeliac disease patients than in healthy or "disease" controls (P<0.0001). Serum anti-actin antibodies were positive in 41 of the 60 coeliac disease patients with mild intestinal histology lesions (69%) and in 123 of the 145 with severe lesions (85.3%) (P<0.05). There was a significant inverse correlation between anti-actin antibody values and the villi/crypts ratio (r=-0.423; P<0.0001). In the 12 coeliac disease patients on gluten-free diet who underwent re-evaluation as they were persistently symptomatic, intestinal histology showed three cases with persistent villous atrophy: all of these were positive for serum anti-actin antibodies ELISA, whereas both serum anti-tTG and EmAs were negative. The other nine patients showed normal intestinal villi and were negative for serum anti-actin antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-actin antibodies are a reliable marker of severe intestinal mucosa damage in coeliac disease patients and a simple ELISA technique offers an accurate method for their determination. These antibodies seem to be a very reliable marker of persistent intestinal damage in coeliac disease patients.     

Seronegative Celiac Disease: Increased Prevalence with Lesser Degrees of Villous Atrophy

Our aim was to assess differences in the sensitivities of serologic tests used for the diagnosis of celiac disease among patients with varying degrees of villous atrophy. Among 115 adults with biopsy-proven celiac disease who fulfilled strict criteria, including serologic testing at the time of diagnosis and response to a gluten-free diet, 71% had total villous atrophy and 29% partial villous atrophy. Endomysial antibody was positive in 77% of those with total villous atrophy, compared to 33% with partial villous atrophy (P < 0.001). There was no difference in sensitivity when the type of presentation (classical vs. silent) was compared. Endomysial antibody-positive and negative patients did not differ with respect to age at diagnosis, duration of symptoms, mode of presentation, or family history of celiac disease. All anti-tissue transglutaminase-positive patients had TVA on biopsy. Seronegative celiac disease occurs. Endomysial antibody positivity correlates with more severe villous atrophy and not mode of presentation of celiac disease. Serologic tests, in clinical practice, lack the sensitivity reported in the literature.     

Serology in adults with celiac disease: limited accuracy in patients with mild histological lesions

Celiac disease (CD) is a gluten-triggered enteropathy, presenting with insidious clinical patterns. It can occasionally be diagnosed in asymptomatic subjects. Our aim was to define the relationship among symptoms at diagnosis, serological markers [tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA), anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) anti-actin antibodies (AAA)] and degree of mucosal damage. A total of 68 consecutive adult patients with CD were enrolled. Intestinal biopsies were scored according to the Marsh classification modified by Oberhuber: I?CII minimal lesions or absent villous atrophy; IIIA partial villous atrophy; IIIB?CC total villous atrophy (TVA). HLA-typing was done for all patients. No association between clinical presentation and severity of mucosal damage was found. Presence of EMA or tTGA was significantly associated with more severe mucosal damage (P?<?0.001). Of 12 patients, 11 with AAA were also positive for TVA. The severity of mucosal damage is the main factor governing the detectability of serological markers of CD. The sensitivity of serological testing is questionable in patients with minimal lesions.     

Histology of the terminal ileum in coeliac disease

BACKGROUND: The histological lesion of gluten sensitivity primarily affects the proximal small bowel. The purpose of this study was to assess whether there were features of gluten-sensitive enteropathy in biopsies taken from the terminal ileum during colonoscopy/ileoscopy. Specific and sensitive abnormalities might facilitate diagnosis of coeliac disease in patients undergoing colonoscopy as their initial procedure or help select those who should proceed to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. METHODS: Terminal ileal biopsies, taken from 30 patients with duodenal villous atrophy consistent with coeliac disease and from 60 control patients with no evidence of coeliac or inflammatory bowel disease, were reviewed blindly and compared. Biopsies were assessed for the presence or absence of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, and counts were made of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). RESULTS: One patient only, in the coeliac group, had partial villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia in the terminal ileum. IEL counts were significantly higher (P< 0.005) in the coeliac group than among controls (mean per 100 enterocytes 26 versus 10). An ileal IEL count > or =25 had a sensitivity for duodenal villous atrophy (VA) of 60% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Coeliac disease may affect the entire small bowel. Increased IEL density in the terminal ileum is associated with duodenal VA and should prompt a search for coeliac disease by serology and duodenal biopsy. Conversely, a normal IEL count does not allow the exclusion of coeliac disease with confidence.     

Adult endomysial antibody-negative coeliac disease and cigarette smoking.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative incidence and characteristics of endomysial antibody (EMA)-negative coeliac disease in adults. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on adults with newly diagnosed coeliac disease, with determination of EMA status before gluten withdrawal. SETTING: District general hospital (secondary care institution). PARTICIPANTS: Sixty consecutive incident cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (i) Proportion of cases who were EMA-negative; (ii) comparison of clinical and laboratory variables at diagnosis for EMA-positive and EMA-negative subjects. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects (25%, 95% CI 15-38%) were EMA negative, of whom only two were IgA deficient. There was clinical evidence in all 15 patients and histological evidence in 13 patients of a response to gluten withdrawal. No significant differences were found between EMA-positive and EMA-negative subjects with respect to histological features, age, gender, clinical manifestations, concurrent autoimmune disorders, family history of coeliac disease, or haemoglobin and albumin concentrations at diagnosis. However, EMA-negative status at diagnosis was associated strongly with current or recent cigarette smoking (OR 7.0, 95% CI 1.7-31.5, P= 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of patients with otherwise typical coeliac disease are EMA negative, and most of these are IgA replete. The value of EMA as a screening tool is therefore limited. EMA status in untreated coeliac disease correlates strongly with cigarette smoking history: this may be of pathogenic significance, given the previously demonstrated association between smoking and the risk of coeliac disease.     

Histology of the terminal ileum in coeliac disease

Background: The histological lesion of gluten sensitivity primarily affects the proximal small bowel. The purpose of this study was to assess whether there were features of gluten‐sensitive enteropathy in biopsies taken from the terminal ileum during colonoscopy/ileoscopy. Specific and sensitive abnormalities might facilitate diagnosis of coeliac disease in patients undergoing colonoscopy as their initial procedure or help select those who should proceed to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. Methods: Terminal ileal biopsies, taken from 30 patients with duodenal villous atrophy consistent with coeliac disease and from 60 control patients with no evidence of coeliac or inflammatory bowel disease, were reviewed blindly and compared. Biopsies were assessed for the presence or absence of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, and counts were made of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). Results: One patient only, in the coeliac group, had partial villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia in the terminal ileum. IEL counts were significantly higher (P?Conclusions: Coeliac disease may affect the entire small bowel. Increased IEL density in the terminal ileum is associated with duodenal VA and should prompt a search for coeliac disease by serology and duodenal biopsy. Conversely, a normal IEL count does not allow the exclusion of coeliac disease with confidence.     

Adult celiac disease with severe or partial villous atrophy: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While severe villous atrophy (SVA) is the most typical histological feature in adult celiac disease (ACD), partial villous atrophy (PVA) is now also frequently found. So far, the impact of the severity of villous atrophy on the clinical presentation of ACD has been scarcely investigated. We aimed to compare the clinical, biological and immune features and outcomes in ACD patients presenting with PVA at diagnosis versus patients with SVA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical files of 48 patients with ACD diagnosed between 1992 and 2003 were retrospectively studied. The diagnosis was based on the presence of intestinal villous atrophy, with increases in intraepithelial lymphocytes and circulating celiac specific antibodies. Villous atrophy was classified as severe (subtotal and total) or partial. Symptoms, biological signs of malabsorption, immune markers, bone mineral density at diagnosis and response to gluten-free diet were recorded. RESULTS: At diagnosis, ten patients (four M/six F) had PVA and 38 patients (five M/33 F) had SVA, with a median age of 54 and 33 years, respectively (p<0.05). Positivity for specific antibodies, HLA typing and frequency of autoimmune disease at diagnosis were similar in both PVA and SVA patients, as was their response to gluten-free diet. Diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome and osteopenia were independent of the degree of villous atrophy. CONCLUSION: PVA was observed in 21% of patients with ACD. Except for their older age at diagnosis, patients with PVA presented with similar clinical, biological and immune characteristics and outcomes as did patients with SVA.     

Wheat starch-containing gluten-free flour products in the treatment of coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. A long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether wheat starch-based gluten-free products are safe in the treatment of gluten intolerance. METHODS: The study involved 41 children and adults with coeliac disease and 11 adults with dermatitis herpetiformis adhering to a gluten-free diet for 8 years on average. Thirty-five newly diagnosed coeliac patients at diagnosis and 6 to 24 months after the start of a gluten-free diet and 27 non-coeliac patients with dyspepsia were investigated for comparison. Daily dietary gluten and wheat starch intake were calculated. Small-bowel mucosal villous architecture, CD3+, alphabeta+, and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes, mucosal HLA-DR expression, and serum endomysial, reticulin, and gliadin antibodies were investigated. RESULTS: Forty of 52 long-term-treated patients adhered to a strict wheat starch-based diet and 6 to a strict naturally gluten-free diet; 6 patients had dietary lapses. In the 46 patients on a strict diet the villous architecture, enterocyte height, and density of alphabeta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes were similar to those in non-coeliac subjects and better than in short-term-treated coeliac patients. The density of gammadelta(+)cells was higher, but they seemed to decrease over time with the gluten-free diet. Wheat starch-based gluten-free flour products did not cause aberrant upregulation of mucosal HLA-DR. The mucosal integrity was not dependent on the daily intake of wheat starch in all patients on a strict diet, whereas two of the six patients with dietary lapses had villous atrophy and positive serology. CONCLUSION: Wheat starch-based gluten-free flour products were not harmful in the treatment of coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis.     

Resurrection of gliadin antibodies in coeliac disease. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibody test provides additional diagnostic benefit

OBJECTIVE: Circulating antibodies against naive, whole gliadin have been replaced by more accurate endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests in the diagnosis of coeliac disease. The purpose of this study was to compare these serological tests with a new test recognizing antibodies against deamidated and defined gliadin peptides. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population comprised selected coeliac disease patients in a tertiary clinic: newly detected patients before and after a gluten-free diet, patients with persistent small-bowel mucosal villous atrophy despite a strict gluten-free diet and non-coeliac controls reporting abdominal symptoms after ingestion of cereals. Comparisons were made between serum IgA-class gliadin peptide, endomysial, tissue transglutaminase and conventional gliadin antibodies. RESULTS: The deamidated gliadin peptide antibody test showed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 98% in coeliac disease. The tissue transglutaminase antibody test performed equally well. The specificity of endomysial antibody was just as high, but its sensitivity was lower, 80%. The conventional gliadin antibody test showed poor sensitivity and specificity. Combination of the deamidated gliadin peptide and tissue transglutaminase tests offered the best sensitivity without loss of specificity in the diagnosis of coeliac disease. All antibody levels declined in line with mucosal recovery. The deamidated gliadin peptide antibody test showed six of the nine cases with small-bowel mucosal damage persisting on a gluten-free diet, whereas tissue transglutaminase detected only two cases and endomysial antibody none. CONCLUSIONS: The new gliadin peptide antibody test proved highly accurate in the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of coeliac disease and can be endorsed in combination with the tissue transglutaminase test.     

Endomysial antibody: is it the best screening test for coeliac disease?

The sensitivities and specificities of the IgA and IgG antigliadin antibody and the IgA antireticulin antibody have been compared with the recently described endomysial antibody directed against the basement membrane of smooth muscle in monkey oesophagus. One hundred and seventeen patients with adult coeliac disease (21 untreated), 84 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis (comprising the disease control group), 47 normal controls and a miscellaneous group of 29 patients, who were selected because of a positive reticulin staining pattern, were investigated. These results were correlated with the degree of abnormality of the intestinal mucosa in patients with adult coeliac disease. Endomysial antibodies were found in all patients with untreated coeliac disease and subtotal villous atrophy and in 47% of patients on a non-strict gluten free diet. One patient on a strict gluten free diet was positive and had partial villous atrophy while all patients in disease control groups were negative. Results were variable with the antireticulin and antigliadin antibodies. Sensitivity and correlation with subtotal villous atrophy in the untreated patients was 100%. It is concluded that the endomysial antibody is superior to other current antibody tests and should be used in preference for the diagnosis of coeliac disease.     

Reliance on Serum Endomysial Antibody Testing Underestimates the True Prevalence of Coeliac Disease by One Fifth

Background: Although IgA endomysial antibody (EmA) is currently the serologic test of choice in selecting suspected coeliac patients for duodenal biopsies, false-negative cases have been reported and may be more common than previous studies suggest. We assessed the sensitivity of EmA for patients with biopsy-confirmed villous atrophy (VA). Methods: We studied 89 patients without IgA deficiency for whom biopsy had not been primarily prompted by a positive EmA result. VA was graded as partial, subtotal, or total (PVA, STVA, TVA). Serum EmA was assayed with indirect immunofluorescence. Results: The sensitivity of EmA for VA was 78% (69 of 89) and was similar for PVA (79%) and ST/TVA (77%). Only 4 of the 20 EmA-negative patients had increased serum IgA-class antigliadin antibody levels as measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All seronegative patients who complied with dietary gluten exclusion responded clinically, with histologic improvement after 12 months in 8 (67%) of 12 patients who had follow-up biopsies. Conclusions: EmA-negative coeliac disease is common. Reliance on EmA testing to select patients for biopsy will result in significant underdiagnosis.     

Coeliac disease diagnosed by means of duodenoscopy and endoscopic duodenal biopsy

Nineteen patients with suspected coeliac disease were examined by duodenoscopy and biopsy. In all patients a histopathology consistent with coeliac disease was demonstrated in endoscopic biopsies of the duodenal mucosa. On close-up view villous atrophy was seen in vivo. Fourteen patients were re-examined on a gluten-free diet. In 13 patients a restitution of the duodenal mucosa was shown. Duodenoscopy combined with biopsy seems to be a reliable method for the assessment of the mucosal change in coeliac disease.     

IgA-class transglutaminase antibodies in evaluating the efficacy of gluten-free diet in coeliac disease

OBJECTIVE : Serum IgA-class tissue transglutaminase antibody has proved effective in screening for coeliac disease. The response to a gluten-free diet has been assessed on the basis of small-intestinal morphology. We investigated whether the tissue transglutaminase antibody test could substitute biopsy in this respect, and whether the test is better than the endomysial antibody test in follow-up. DESIGN : Controlled cross sectional, and follow-up study. METHODS : Serum IgA-class tissue transglutaminase antibodies and endomysial antibodies were determined in 87 coeliac adults on a gluten-free diet. All underwent small bowel biopsy, and the mucosal morphology was interpreted along with Marsh's grading 0-3. In 30 patients histological and serological data could be analysed before and after adopting the diet; Marsh 3 was considered inadequate mucosal recovery during the diet. RESULTS : Of the 87 coeliac patients 27 showed Marsh 3 villous atrophy on gluten-free diet; of these 27, tissue transglutaminase antibody was within normal limits in 16 (59%) and endomysial antibody in 20 (74%). Two (7%) out of 29 with normal mucosa (Marsh 0) had positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies. Six (55%) out of 11 admitting regular dietary lapses remained tissue transglutaminase antibody negative. In the follow-up, serum IgA-class tissue transglutaminase antibody was initially positive in 28 (93%) out of 30 untreated patients; even a significant decrease in tissue transglutaminase antibody did not guarantee mucosal recovery. CONCLUSIONS : A substantial number of coeliac patients with negative tissue transglutaminase or endomysial antibodies may still have manifest mucosal villous atrophy. Small bowel biopsy is therefore still necessary to ensure that the gluten-free diet is adequate.     

Reliance on serum endomysial antibody testing underestimates the true prevalence of coeliac disease by one fifth

BACKGROUND: Although IgA endomysial antibody (EmA) is currently the serologic test of choice in selecting suspected coeliac patients for duodenal biopsies, false-negative cases have been reported and may be more common than previous studies suggest. We assessed the sensitivity of EmA for patients with biopsy-confirmed villous atrophy (VA). METHODS: We studied 89 patients without IgA deficiency for whom biopsy had not been primarily prompted by a positive EmA result. VA was graded as partial, subtotal, or total (PVA, STVA, TVA). Serum EmA was assayed with indirect immunofluorescence. RESULTS: The sensitivity of EmA for VA was 78% (69 of 89) and was similar for PVA (79%) and ST/TVA (77%). Only 4 of the 20 EmA-negative patients had increased serum IgA-class antigliadin antibody levels as measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All seronegative patients who complied with dietary gluten exclusion responded clinically, with histologic improvement after 12 months in 8 (67%) of 12 patients who had follow-up biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: EmA-negative coeliac disease is common. Reliance on EmA testing to select patients for biopsy will result in significant underdiagnosis.     

Endomysium antibodies in coeliac disease: an improved method.

The ultra structural binding sites of endomysium antibodies have been studied on human umbilical cord tissue. The sensitivity and specificity of IgA endomysium antibodies were compared with recently described methods using basement membrane of smooth muscle of monkey oesophagus. Thirty adults affected by coeliac disease (10 in remission) and 75 healthy adult controls with normal intestinal mucosa (35 false antigliadin positive) were investigated. Sensitivity and correlation of endomysium antibodies with total villous atrophy in untreated coeliac disease patients were 100% on the human umbilical cord smooth muscles, and only 90% on the muscular layer of primate oesophagus. Indirect immunofluorescence was superior to peroxidase staining in detecting these IgA antibodies. The easy availability and enhanced testing sensitivity of the umbilical cord is an advance towards a better diagnostic tool for coeliac disease.     

Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale in Coeliac Disease Patients on Wheat Starch-based Gluten-free Diets

Background: A wheat starch-based gluten-free diet is widely adopted in the treatment of coeliac disease, even though the products contain trace amounts of gluten. The aim here was to establish whether such a diet sustains abdominal symptoms. Methods: The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) was applied to 58 coeliac disease patients on gluten-free diets and 110 non-coeliac controls. An estimate was made of daily dietary fibre and wheat starch-derived gluten. Psychological well-being was evaluated by a structured interview. Twenty-three coeliac patients consented to small-bowel biopsy. Results: The mean GSRS score in coeliac disease patients did not differ from that in control subjects. Poorer psychological well-being was associated with abdominal symptoms in coeliac patients, whereas the daily amount of wheat starch had no effect on GSRS score. Overall dietary compliance was good, and villous atrophy was found in only 2 out of 23 patients. The average fibre consumption, 13 g per day, was lower than recommended. Conclusions: Wheat starch-based gluten-free products are well-tolerated in coeliac disease patients, provided that their diets are otherwise strict.     

Capsule endoscopy: An alternative to duodenal biopsy for the recognition of villous atrophy in coeliac disease?

BACKGROUND: Villous atrophy present on a duodenal biopsy remains the 'gold standard' diagnostic test for coeliac disease. However, endoscopic biopsy may cause morbidity and discomfort. Our aim was to evaluate wireless capsule endoscopy as an alternative test for the recognition of villous atrophy. METHOD: Twenty-one patients with a positive endomysial antibody referred for endoscopy and duodenal biopsy were also offered a wireless capsule endoscopy to evaluate their small bowel. Concurrently, other patients (n=23) referred for a wireless capsule endoscopy acted as controls. Wireless capsule endoscopy reports were assessed for the presence of villous atrophy by one blinded investigator. RESULTS: Twenty endomysial antibody positive patients subsequently had villous atrophy on duodenal biopsy. The controls all had normal duodenal biopsies (with a negative endomysial antibody) and no evidence of villous atrophy noted on their wireless capsule endoscopy. Of the 20 endomysial antibody positive patients with confirmed villous atrophy on biopsy, 17 had villous atrophy also detected by wireless capsule endoscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for wireless capsule endoscopy recognising villous atrophy were 85%, 100%, 100%, 88.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Wireless capsule endoscopy may be an option to recognise villous atrophy in patients with a positive endomysial antibody who are unwilling, or unable to have a gastroscopy. However, a negative test should be followed by a biopsy if coeliac disease is to be excluded.     

Gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale in coeliac disease patients on wheat starch-based gluten-free diets

BACKGROUND: A wheat starch-based gluten-free diet is widely adopted in the treatment of coeliac disease, even though the products contain trace amounts of gluten. The aim here was to establish whether such a diet sustains abdominal symptoms. METHODS: The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) was applied to 58 coeliac disease patients on gluten-free diets and 110 non-coeliac controls. An estimate was made of daily dietary fibre and wheat starch-derived gluten. Psychological well-being was evaluated by a structured interview. Twenty-three coeliac patients consented to small-bowel biopsy. RESULTS: The mean GSRS score in coeliac disease patients did not differ from that in control subjects. Poorer psychological well-being was associated with abdominal symptoms in coeliac patients, whereas the daily amount of wheat starch had no effect on GSRS score. Overall dietary compliance was good, and villous atrophy was found in only 2 out of 23 patients. The average fibre consumption, 13 g per day, was lower than recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Wheat starch-based gluten-free products are well-tolerated in coeliac disease patients, provided that their diets are otherwise strict.     

Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE: We have undertaken a study to assess the efficiency of serological tests in the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) during the period January 1, 1994 to January 7, 1997. Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity of IgA antiendomysium (EMA) and IgA antigliadin (AGA) with regard to the degree of histological abnormality in biopsy specimens of small intestine in untreated celiac disease patients and first-degree relatives. METHODS: The study population comprised 101 cases: 85 untreated celiac patients and 16 first-degree relatives with a mean age of 42 yr (range, 2-76 yrs). Sixteen of 85 were excluded from study because they did not satisfy the study or diagnostic criteria of CD. EMA and AGA have been compared with the degree of villous atrophy (VA) in 69 celiac patients and 16 relatives according to the Marsh criteria of 1992. We divided the Marsh III histology into three subgroups as follows: Marsh IIIa (partial VA), Marsh IIIb (subtotal VA), and Marsh IIIc (total villous atrophy). RESULTS: The specificity and positive predictive value of EMA for CD was excellent, because all EMA-positive patients (n = 42) were diagnosed with CD. The sensitivity of EMA, however, differed between CD subgroups; in patients with total VA, the sensitivity of EMA was 100% (17/17). However, in patients with partial VA (Marsh IIIa), the sensitivity of EMA was disappointing, only 9/29 (31%). Three of 72 celiacs with Marsh IIIb and Marsh IIIc had IgA deficiency and were excluded from the study. Elevated AGA has been detected in the sera of 39 of 69 (62%) patients. A combination of EMA and AGA tests showed a sensitivity of 76% (53/69). None of 16 first-degree relatives with Marsh I-II had positive EMA. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of negative serology needs great awareness. Although EMA sensitivity in total villous atrophy is excellent, in partial villous atrophy the sensitivity of EMA appears to be disappointing. Our experience shows that EMA and AGA have only limited value in screening programs for CD.