History and Technical Aspects of Bariatric Surgery in the Czech Republic

Background: Central Europe and the Czech Republic are specific in the prevalence of obesity which has increased by 10-40% during the last 10 years. Methods: In the Czech republic there is 30 years of experience of a comprehensive approach to obesity treatment which includes: dietary treatment; exercise; behavioral modification; drug treatment; and bariatric surgery. Each of these approaches has its place in complex obesity management. Since 1983 bariatric surgery has been established in the Czech Republic for the treatment of morbid obesity. Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), gastric banding, laparoscopic nonadjustable and adjustable gastric bandings have been used over the years. Since 1993 laparoscopic gastric banding has been the only method used in our department. Results: The comprehensive approach for obesity treatment in the Czech Republic has resulted in the development of obesity management and research centers, regional obesity units, obesity out-patients clinics and weight reduction clubs. The surgical treatment is a well-established part of this system and the long-term results of surgical treatment are acceptable both in terms of weight loss and complication rate. There has been no statistical difference in weight loss results following VBG and laparoscopic gastric banding, but there is a significant decrease in morbidity, and shorter hospital stay associated with laparoscopic gastric banding. Conclusions: The surgical approach in obesity treatment has an important place in the comprehensive care of obese patients. Laparoscopic gastric banding in the hands of an experienced surgeon is a method with low morbidity, short hospital stay and long-term weight loss results which are fully comparable with the results of other surgical approaches.     

Preoperative Weight Gain in Bariatric Surgery

A significant weight gain with a mean of 4.4 kg was found between the date of acceptance for bariatric surgery and the date of admission to hospital for the operation.     

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty vs Gastric Bypass: 10 Years follow-up

In 1982, a prospective study to evaluate and compare the operations for treatment of morbid obesity, vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP), was carried out at the Center for Surgical Treatment of Obesity in Los Angeles. The VBG was performed as described by Dr Mason with a 5.0 cm circumference Marlex band. The GBP was the horizontal GBP with ≤ 50 cc pouch as described by Mason and modified by Printen and Griffen. One hundred patients had the VBG and 100 had the GBP. At 10 years follow-up, only 43 of the VBG patients and 46 of the GBP patients can be found. The groups are compared as to the perioperative complications, late complications and weight loss. VBG compared favorably with GBP for control of morbid obesity. GBP yields better weight loss and maintenance at all times of follow-up. Both procedures are equal in terms of morbidity and mortality.     

Results of Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity in Patients Older than 50 Years

Background: Surgery is increasingly used for weight loss in morbidly obese patients. The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients older than 50 years. Methods: Prospective data on 62 consecutive patients (Male = 13, Female = 49) undergoing bariatric procedures between 1985-1994 were reviewed. Mean followup was 30 ± 2 months (3-48 months). All data are mean ± sem. Results: Age was 57 ± 1 year (range 50-71 years). Patients had a mean preoperative weight of 125 ± 4 kg (275 ± 9 lb) and 119 ± 6% excess body weight. A total of 68 procedures were performed: vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG = 23), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB = 43), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD = 2). Six patients were converted to RYGB (5) and BPD (1) after failed VBG. Hospital mortality was nil. Complications were wound infection (5), pulmonary (4), gastric leak (2), abscess (1) and others (4). Mean weight loss at 3 years was 55 ± 7 and 33 ± 6% of percent excess body weight for RYGB and VBG, respectively. Postoperative use of medications for arthritis, diabetes mellitus and asthma was reduced by 23%, 62% and 100%, respectively. Satisfaction with the outcome of treatment and weight loss was reported by 81% of patients. Six patients that were converted from jejunoileal bypass (metabolic complications) to VBG gained weight. Conclusions: Bariatric surgery is safe and well tolerated in morbidly obese patients older than 50 years. Weight loss parallels that of younger populations and is greater in patients treated with RYGB in this subgroup. Age should not be a contraindication to bariatric surgery provided the patient has obesity-related medical morbidity. Control of obesity-related co-morbid conditions is improved by weight loss.     

A Nationwide Survey on Bariatric Surgery in France: Two Years Prospective Follow-up

Background Most studies on bariatric surgery outcomes have been performed in clinical trials (eg. the SOS) or reflect the clinical experience and practice of specific and experienced centers. Little is known about the current practice at a nationwide level. Methods This is a systematic nationwide study on the 2-year outcome of all consecutive 1,236 bariatric operations performed in France. Data on mortality, weight loss, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected independently from the medical and surgical team involved in the patients’ care. Results 87.3% of the patients underwent an adjustable gastric banding (ABG), 8.6% a vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), 3.8% a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and 0.3% a biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). Loss of follow-up was 12% at year 1 and 18% at year 2. The rate of laparoscopic procedures was 98% for ABG and 73% for RYGBP. Mortality rate was 0.16% in the operative period and 0.27% during follow-up. Excess weight loss ranged from 43% (AGB) to 66% (RYGBP). Co-morbidities improved in more than 70% of patients. Conclusion Outcomes of bariatric surgery in routine practice (mortality, weight loss, course of co-morbidities, and quality of life) are similar to the results published in clinical trials.     

Body Composition and Source of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery

Background: Little is known about the composition and source of weight loss after bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), lean body weight (LBW), fat weight (FW) and left ventricular cardiac mass (LVM) following vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Methods: After VBG for morbid obesity, 26 women and four men (mean age = 39.1 years) were weighed and had body composition analysis undertaken at intervals. Thirteen patients underwent echocardiography preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively to determine change in LVM and LVM index. Results: Over 12 months there was significant weight loss for all weight parameters examined (p < 0.05). Fat weight loss was most significant; total weight loss and reduction of BMI were significant but less so than fat loss (Wilcoxon's signed ranks test). LBW loss had the smallest contribution to weight loss (p < 0.0001). There was a significant loss of LVM and posterior cardiac wall thickness (p < 0.05). Conclusions: VBG can lead to loss of lean body weight and left ventricular mass, and more dramatically, fat weight, body weight, and BMI. Cardiac mass and lean body mass are preferentially conserved relative to body fat with weight loss after VBG.     

The Medical Malpractice Risk Associated with Bariatric Surgery

Background: Bariatric surgery has been classified as high risk by the medical malpractice industry, but it is unclear what data support this classification. When a small group of physicians is separated from their peers and asked to support their malpractice claims, their premiums will often rise unfairly in relation to the outcome of the claims. This report outlines the results of a survey sent to the members of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery (ASBS) asking for information on malpractice claims. Methods: Surveys were mailed to the 285 ASBS members requesting which bariatric operations were performed, how many procedures were completed each year, details of any suits filed against the member including final outcome, and information on whether the members also performed gastric surgery for ulcer disease. Results: Surveys were returned by 165 members (58%) from surgeons in 33 states and Washington, D.C. Malpractice claims had been made after 107 bariatric procedures and three ulcer procedures with the risk of a suit being filed for a bariatric procedure being approximately 1.6/1,000 cases. The average monetary award was $88,667. Of the suits that resulted in a jury trial, 14% agreed with the plaintiff. Over half the cases that had been resolved were either dropped or dismissed before trial. Conclusions: The incidence of suit being brought against ASBS members performing bariatric procedures is low. Once filed, most cases do not reach a jury trial. Settlements are usually under $100,000. These data suggest that this group of bariatric surgeons do not represent a disproportionately large risk pool for medical malpractice insurance companies.     

Social and Economic Effects of Bariatric Surgery

One to 5 years after gastric restrictive surgery and subsequent weight loss, 79 bariatric surgery patients were compared with a similar group of 54 non-operated patients. The operated group had a significantly higher proportion of employment, more working hours, and a higher income. They were also more active in different physical and social activities and had a better sexual life. They required less medical care, had fewer days of sick leave or sick pension, and gave a much higher score in assessment of their general health. The results indicate that obesity surgery is highly cost-effective.     

Technical Points in Vertical Gastroplasty for Morbid Obesity

The success of vertical gastroplasty may be jeopardized by gastric leakage or ulceration due to failure of the technique. Reports of band erosion and staple-line leakage have led us to seek technical improvements to reduce technical failures. We describe a modification to the technique of band placement and a manoeuvre to aid the placement of staples when the TA90 staple gun is used.     

Gastric Pouch Adenocarcinoma and Tubular Adenoma of the Pylorus: A Field Effect of Dysplasia following Bariatric Surgery

There are reports of gastric carcinoma following bariatric surgery, but it is unclear if these procedures predispose to malignancy.We present a case of a 60-year-old man who, 15 years after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), had a massive upper GI bleed. Endoscopy revealed a large tumor of the gastric pouch. Histology confirmed an intestinal type of gastric adenocarcinoma arising in a background of H. pylori-negative gastritis with atrophy, foveolar hyperplasia and intestinal metaplasia. An incidental tubular adenoma at the pylorus was also identified. The pathogenesis of gastric pouch carcinoma is discussed. The present example of neoplastic change in both the pouch and pylorus may indicate that a field effect for dysplasia develops subsequent to VBG.     

The Influence of a New Timing Strategy of Band Adjustment on the Vomiting Frequency and the Food Consumption of Obese Women Operated with Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (LAP-BAND)

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a new timing strategy of band adjustment on the short-term outcome of obese women operated with adjustable silicone gastric banding. Subjects: The outcome of 30 women without binge-eating disorder operated with laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding with a wider intraoperatory band calibration (LAP-BAND) was compared to that of 30 body mass index-matched women without binge-eating disorder previously operated with adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) applied by laparotomy with the usual intraoperatory band calibration. The patients were evaluated 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Measurements: (1) weight loss; (2) total daily energy intake; (3) percent as liquid, soft or solid food; (4) vomiting frequency; (5) rate of postoperative percutaneous band adjustments; (6) rate of band-related complications. Results: Both the weight loss and the daily energy intake did not differ between patients with LAP-BAND and patients with ASGB. After surgery, the patients with LAP-BAND ate more solid food and less liquid food than the patients with ASGB. Vomiting frequency was higher in patients with ASGB than in patients with LAP-BAND. The total number of percutaneous band adjustments was higher in women with LAP-BAND than in women with ASGB. Band inflation because of weight stabilization was performed in six (20.0%) women with ASGB and in 19 (63.3%) women with LAP-BAND. Neostoma stenosis occurred in one women with ASGB, but in none of the women with LAP-BAND. One patient with LAP-BAND presented band slippage. Conclusions: The wider intraoperatory band calibration performed in patients with LAP-BAND did not reduce the short-term efficacy of adjustable silicone gastric banding. This new timing strategy of band adjustment required more postoperative percutaneous band inflations, but it improved the eating pattern of the patients (low vomiting frequency and high intake of solid food).     

Gastric Bypass and Vertical Banded Gastroplasty- a Prospective Randomized Comparison and 5-Year Follow-up

Background: a prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare the outcome of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) in patients with clinically severe obesity. Methods: eligibility criteria included Class IV obesity, <50 years old and a history of at least one attempt of non-operative weight loss. Patients were managed conservatively for 3 months prior to surgery. Patients were followed post-operatively and monitored for early and late complications and their weight loss outcome for up to 5 years. Results: 44 patients were recruited. Two patients withdrew within 4 weeks and were excluded. Twenty subjects had a GBP and 22 a VBG. There were no significant differences with respect to age, gender, maximum or pre-operative weight between the groups (p > 0.05). Patients who underwent GBP demonstrated significantly greater post-operative weight loss (p < 0.05) which was apparent from 6 months onwards. There were no deaths, pulmonary emboli, post-operative leaks or wound dehiscence. There were no instances of staple-line disruption. Symptomatic ulcer disease, confirmed endoscopically, developed in 25% of GBP patients. Nine patients developed gallstones post-operatively of whom five were in the VBG and four in the GBP group. Conclusions: weight loss following GBP was maintained, while VBG patients slowly regained.     

Esophageal Anatomy and Function in Laparoscopic Gastric Restrictive Bariatric Surgery: Implications for Patient Selection

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess factors of clinical importance in morbidly obese patients having a laparoscopically adjustable gastric band (LAP-BAND?) implanted in order to achieve weight loss. Methods: Preoperative evaluation of hiatus hernia and esophageal (dys)motility were compared with the need for reoperation. Results are presented for the first 50 consecutive patients entered. Results: Nine of the first 50 patients required reoperation (18%). Five (10%) were for LAP-BAND slippage on the stomach. Of these five, reoperation was required in four of 12 (33%) with hiatus hernia (P = 0.0093); three of nine (33%) with a motility disorder (P = 0.025); and three of six (50%) with both hiatus hernia and a motility disorder (P = 0.0076). Conclusions: We identify two factors, hiatus hernia and esophageal dysmotility, which are associated, both independently as well as in combination, with reoperation for LAP-BAND? slippage. Both patients and their physicians should consider these data when considering the LAP-BAND? as possible therapy for morbid obesity.     

Mini-Gastric Bypass for Revision of Failed Primary Restrictive Procedures: A Valuable Option

Background Despite the initial success of primary gastric restrictive operations, many patients require revision for weight regain, mechanical complications or intolerance to restriction. The mini-gastric bypass (MGB) for revision of failed primary restrictive procedures was evaluated. Methods 33 patients undergoing revisional surgery to a MGB for a failed silastic ring vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) or a gastric banding (GB) from June 2005 to September 2006, were reviewed at an academic institution. The patients had had a minilaparotomy. Revision of the VBGs was further compared with revision of the GBs. Results The MGB was completed in all except 2 patients who required Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) because of gastric tube damage. Mean age was 41 years (range 20–64), preoperative BMI was 39.5 kg/m² (range 28–58), and 20 (65%) were women. The revision was performed after an average of 36.3 months (range 12–84), and was more time-consuming in patients with prior VBG than GB (184 vs 155 min, P = 0.007). Postoperative complications occurred in 2 (6.4%) with prior VBG, and length of hospital stay was 4.65 days (range 3–17).Mean BMI at 6 months was 30.6 (range 24.8–50.0, P < 0.001) compared with the preoperative BMI. Reflux disease was cured, and all patients noted major improvement in the eating dimension. Conclusion Open MGB through a previous mini-incision is a safe and effective operation for revision of failed gastric restrictive operations. The revision procedure was technically more difficult in patients with prior VBG and hazardous in patients with prior redo VBG.     

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the operation of choice for bariatric surgery

Conclusion The choice of surgical procedures for an individual patient must be made by a surgeon who has all of the tools available to them in their environment. Decisions need to be made depending on the individual clinical scenario. No single tool or procedure can be considered appropriate for all patients. Assimilation of the known data is necessary for the surgeon to offer the appropriate procedure to the appropriate patient. The well-informed and well-trained individual will recognize that the best choice for most patients seeking surgical treatment for clinical severe obesity is laparoscopic RGB.     

Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding: a Preliminary Experience

Background: The authors have been performing bariatric surgery for 15 years; since February 1992 they have carried out laparoscopic gastric banding (LGB) with a silastic band. Good experience with the LGB combined with everyday laparoscopic activity in their institution persuaded them to try laparoscopic placement of the Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB). Methods: The surgical procedure is the same as that for laparoscopic gastric banding except for the use of a 15 mm trocar that is required to introduce the band, and the need to place a port that is connected to the band via a wide loop tube; the port is place subcutaneously and is supported by the lower part of the sternum. The authors do not use any abdominal drain nor a naso-gastric tube. At surgery the band is left empty, and filling is usually not started until 4 weeks after surgery. The patient is immediately mobilized and begins a liquid diet the evening after the operation. The patients are usually discharged from hospital on the first postoperative day. Results: Over 8 months, 24 patients underwent SAGB, with mean BMI 44.69 and mean operating time 45 minutes (range 30-75). No early complications occurred. Preliminary results in this small series show BMIs of 38.65 and 34.60 at 3 and 6 months postoperation. Conclusion: SAGB appears for be a good method for obesity surgery. It is easy to perform and is associated with a low operative risk. Provided that the band is put in the right place, weight loss can be adjusted to patient comfort.     

Stoma Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding versus Vertical Banded Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity

Background: Among gastric restrictive operations, the procedure of choice is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the results of two different gastric restrictive procedures: vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and stoma adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB). Methods: Between 1991 and 1996, 51 patients were treated surgically for morbid obesity: 27 underwent VBG and 24 underwent ASGB. Preoperative body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI) and percentage of ideal body weight (% IBW) were (mean ± SD): 145.7 ± 45.3 kg; 53.9 ± 15.9 kg/m²; 249.1 ± 73.5% respectively in the VBG group. Corresponding figures for the ASBG group were 132.5 ± 22.7 kg; 46.9 ± 7.8 kg/m² and 207.2 ± 35.0%. Results: In the VBG group, the median follow-up period was 26 months (range: 7-47). Eighteen months after the operation BW, BMI, % IBW and percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL) were 85.5 ± 26.8 kg, 31.9 ± 9.8 kg/m², 145.4 ± 43.9% and 74 ± 1% respectively. Complications included incisional hernia (n = 1), and bowel obstruction (n = 1). One patient died of acute myocardial infarction on the third postoperative day. In the ASGB group, median follow-up time was 19.7 months (range: 18-26). At 18 months postoperation BW, BMI, % IBW and % EWL values were 86.6 ± 20.6 kg 30.6 ± 6.6 kg/m2 140.6 ± 29.3% and 64 ± 1% respectively. Gastric wall erosion occurred in two patients and the bands had to be removed. These patients underwent VBG 6 months later. Complications encountered in this group were incisional hernia (n = 1), outlet stenosis and reflux esophagitis (n = 1), reservoir leakage (n = 1) and gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1). Two patients died of pulmonary embolism and acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions: Weight reduction was not statistically significant between the two groups. ASGB was easier to perform and less invasive than VBG.     

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty at More than 5 Years

Background: Optimal evaluation of the results of surgery for morbid obesity requires a long-term follow-up for at least 5 years. Methods: One hundred patients were operated by vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and revised with a follow-up of no less than 5 years. Sixty patients were morbidly obese with a body mass index (BMI) of between 40 and 50 kg/m², and 40 were superobese with a BMI of >50 kg/m². Follow-up included 93 patients (93%). Results: Initial surgical mortality was nil. Twenty-five patients required surgery for complications related to the technique (25%) and one patient died due to pulmonary embolism after a re-stapling operation. The percentage excess weight loss was 54.3%, and the BMI was 33 kg/m² for the 84 patients followed to 5 years post VBG. Only 40 out of 92 patients (43.5%), obtained the weight loss benefit due to the operation. None of them is able to eat a regular diet, and the quality of food intake has been severely affected in some of them. Conclusions: VBG is, in our experience, a safe and technically simple operation, but the long-term results are questionable. The reoperation rate was high, and weight loss and quality of life are superior with other operations.