Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia decrease the incidence of death and major complications during and after four types of intraabdominal surgical procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even though many beneficial aspects of epidural anesthesia have been reported, clinical trials of epidural anesthesia for outcome of surgical patients have shown conflicting results. METHODS: The authors studied 1,021 patients who required anesthesia for one of the intraabdominal aortic, gastric, biliary, or colon operations. They were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids (group 1) or epidural plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural morphine (group 2). The patients were monitored for death and major complications during and for 30 days after surgery, as well as for postoperative pain, time of ambulation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death and major complications between the two groups. For abdominal aortic surgical patients, unlike the other three types of surgical patients, the overall incidence of death and major complications was significantly lower in group 2 patients (22%) than in group 1 patients (37%), stemming from differences in the incidence of new myocardial infarction, stroke, and respiratory failure between the two groups. Overall, group 2 patients received significantly less analgesic medication but had better pain relief than group 1 patients. In group 2 aortic patients, endotracheal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and surgical intensive care stay was 3.5 hours shorter. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of anesthetic and postoperative analgesic techniques on perioperative outcome varies with the type of operation performed. Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain relief. Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and shorten the intubation time and intensive care stay in patients undergoing abdominal aortic operations.     

Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in patient outcome and reduced use of medical resources may result from using epidural anesthesia and analgesia as compared with general anesthesia and intravenous opioids, although the relative importance of intraoperative versus postoperative technique has not been studied. This prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial was designed to compare alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with respect to postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta. METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta were randomly assigned to receive either thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia or general anesthesia alone intraoperatively and either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively (four treatment groups). Patient-controlled analgesia was continued for at least 72 h. Protocols were used to standardize perioperative medical management and to preserve masking intraoperatively and postoperatively. A uniform surveillance strategy was used for the identification of prospectively defined postoperative complications. Outcome evaluation included postoperative hospital length of stay, direct medical costs, selected postoperative morbidities, and postoperative recovery milestones. RESULTS: Length of stay and direct medical costs for patients surviving to discharge were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative outcomes were similar among the four treatment groups with respect to death, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, reoperation, pneumonia, and renal failure. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia was associated with a significantly shorter time to extubation (P = 0.002). Times to intensive care unit discharge, ward admission, first bowel sounds, first flatus, tolerating clear liquids, tolerating regular diet, and independent ambulation were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar among the four treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta, thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia and followed by either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia, offers no major advantage or disadvantage when compared with general anesthesia alone followed by either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia.     

Patient-controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia using bupivacaine or morphine following major abdominal surgery. No difference in postoperative morbidity]

In 1987, Yeager et al. reported that intraoperative epidural anesthesia with local anesthetics and postoperative epidural analgesia with opiates diminished postoperative morbidity. In our first clinical trial on this topic, the better postoperative analgesia with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl failed to improve the outcome after major abdominal operations over that obtained with parenteral piritramide. This randomized controlled investigation was designed to assess whether intraoperative epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia with morphine would diminish the overall rate of postoperative complications after major abdominal operations compared with general anesthesia (without epidural) followed by patient controlled analgesia with morphine, and with intraoperative epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine and light general anesthesia followed by postoperative bupivacaine-morphine analgesia. METHODS. A total of 292 patients undergoing infrarenal aortic bypass operation, gastric resection, gastrectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection, Whipple's operation or cystectomy and neobladder formation were randomly divided into three groups: 1. PCA group (patient controlled analgesia, n = 107): patients were operated on under general anesthesia (midazolam, fentanyl, N2O/O2, if necessary with addition of halothane, enflurane or isoflurane; muscle relaxation with pancuronium bromide). Postoperative management consisted in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (Prominject), bolus 2 mg, lock-out 5 min (recovery room, intensive care unit) or 15 min (surgical ward). 2. EBM group (epidural bupivacaine+morphine, n = 95): operation under light general anesthesia (midazolam, low-dose fentanyl, N2O/O2, pancuronium bromide). In addition, a mixture of bupivacaine (0.25%) and morphine (60 micrograms/ml) was infused (approximately 0.1 ml/kg.h) via an epidural catheter during and after the operation (approximately 72 h). 3. EM group (epidural morphine, n = 90): operation under the same kind of general-epidural anesthesia as in the EBM group. Postoperatively, epidural injection of morphine (0.05 mg/kg in 10 ml of saline) on request up to the 3rd postoperative day. Quality of analgesia (at rest and when patients coughed vigorously), strength of cough, and rate-pressure product were recorded at 8:00 h, 12:00 noon, 16:00 h and 20:00 h on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd postoperative days. Incidence and intensity of all postoperative complications (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal and other organ failure, reoperations, major infection, sepsis, thromboembolism, metabolic and mental disturbances) were assessed from the day of operation until discharge or death (n = 10), respectively. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the PCA and EM groups analgesia was equal but of slightly inferior quality compared with the EBM group. The ability to cough was best in the EBM group and significantly worse in the PCA and EM groups, with no difference between the last two. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery

The goal of this randomized study of high-risk surgical patients was to determine whether intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia in combination with light general anesthesia alters postoperative morbidity when compared to a standard technique of "balanced" general anesthesia. A total of 173 patients scheduled for abdominal aortic reconstruction were admitted to the study; 86 were to receive "balanced" general anesthesia (group 1) and 87 thoracic epidural anesthesia in combination with light general anesthesia (group 2). Preoperative evaluation included standard clinical tools, dipyridamole thallium gammatomography, and radionuclide angiography. In these patients, all of whom had peripheral artery disease, there were no significant differences in associated coronary artery disease, hypertension, and cardiovascular treatment. The distribution of left ventricular ejection fraction and the number of patients with thallium redistribution were not statistically different between the two groups. During the postoperative period, group 1 received analgesia of subcutaneous morphine (n = 35), epidural fentanyl (n = 30), or epidural bupivacaine (n = 21). In group 2, 6 patients with a nonfunctioning epidural catheter due to technical failure received a balanced general anesthesia and were eliminated from the study. During the postoperative period, group 2 received analgesia of subcutaneous morphine (n = 26), epidural fentanyl (n = 25), or epidural bupivacaine (n = 30). Cardiovascular morbidity did not differ between the two groups: 22 patients in group 1 and 19 patients in group 2 had a major postoperative cardiac event.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparison of intravenous-based and epidural-based techniques for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Purpose We wished to compare the effectiveness of intravenous-based (IV) and epidural-based (EPI) techniques for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Effectiveness was compared in terms of reduction of postoperative pain and adverse events, and achieving a high level of patient satisfaction. Methods Thirty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II patients aged more than 65 years, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were enrolled in this study. The patients in the IV group (n = 15) received modified neurolept anesthesia with droperidol 0.2 mg·kg⁻¹ and pentazocine 0.15–0.3 mg·kg⁻¹ (maximum dose of 1.0 mg·kg⁻¹) and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen, followed by postoperative intravenous infusion of 20 μg·ml⁻¹ buprenorphine, provided with a patient-controlled analgesia pump programmed to deliver a bolus of 0.5 ml with a lockout interval of 15 min and a background infusion of 0.5 ml·h⁻¹. The patients in the EPI group (n = 15) had combined epidural analgesia and general anesthesia with sevoflurane and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen, followed by the epidural infusion of a 0.125% bupivacaine and 5 μg · ml⁻¹ buprenorphine mixture by means of an on-demand analgesic system (bolus of 2 ml, lockout interval of 60 min, and background infusion of 2 ml·h⁻¹). Results The quality of postoperative analgesia was similar in the two groups. The incidences of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia and postoperative hypotension were significantly lower in the IV group than in the EPI group (P < 0.05). A significantly higher level of patient satisfaction was found in the IV group compared with that in the EPI group (P < 0.05). The major contributor to dissatisfaction in the EPI group was anxiety or discomfort associated with the epidural procedures. Conclusion Modified neurolept anesthesia with pentazocine and postoperative i.v. analgesia with buprenorphine were superior to epidural-based techniques, in terms of hemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction, in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Best evidence in anesthetic practice Prevention: epidural anesthesia and analgesia does not reduce 30-day all-cause mortality and major morbidity after abdominal surgery

Question  

For patients undergoing major abdominal operations, does epidural/general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia reduce the 30-day frequency of postoperative death and major complications compared to general anesthesia and postoperative systemic opioid analgesia?     

The use of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in aortic surgery.

During a 3-year period, sixty-four consecutive patients, who had elective aortic reconstruction were investigated to determine whether epidural anesthesia and analgesia, combined with light general anesthesia, would lower the rate of perioperative complications in this high-risk group of patients. The epidural group comprised 32 consecutive patients who had surgery during the 20-month period from July 1986 to December 1987. These patients were compared with the previous 32 patients who had aortic reconstruction at Huntington Memorial Hospital (Pasadena, CA) using conventional general anesthetic techniques. Cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and duration of endotracheal intubation were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular morbidity, length of hospital stay, or intensive care unit stay between the two groups. There was however, a striking decrease in respiratory complications and length of intubation in the epidural anesthesia group (P less than 0.005). The authors conclude that epidural anesthesia and analgesia, combined with a light general anesthetic may confer benefits over conventional general anesthesia in patients undergoing aortic surgery.     

Double-masked Randomized Trial Comparing Alternate Combinations of Intraoperative Anesthesia and Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Aortic Surgery

Background : Improvement in patient outcome and reduced use of medical resources may result from using epidural anesthesia and analgesia as compared with general anesthesia and intravenous opioids, although the relative importance of intraoperative versus postoperative technique has not been studied. This prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial was designed to compare alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with respect to postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta.

Methods : One hundred sixty-eight patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta were randomly assigned to receive either thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia or general anesthesia alone intraoperatively and either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively (four treatment groups). Patient-controlled analgesia was continued for at least 72 h. Protocols were used to standardize perioperative medical management and to preserve masking intraoperatively and postoperatively. A uniform surveillance strategy was used for the identification of prospectively defined postoperative complications. Outcome evaluation included postoperative hospital length of stay, direct medical costs, selected postoperative morbidities, and postoperative recovery milestones.

Results : Length of stay and direct medical costs for patients surviving to discharge were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative outcomes were similar among the four treatment groups with respect to death, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, reoperation, pneumonia, and renal failure. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia was associated with a significantly shorter time to extubation (P = 0.002). Times to intensive care unit discharge, ward admission, first bowel sounds, first flatus, tolerating clear liquids, tolerating regular diet, and independent ambulation were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar among the four treatment groups.     

Postoperative pulmonary complications: general anesthesia with postoperative parenteral morphine compared with epidural analgesia

In a prospective study, patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery were randomly allocated to receive either general anesthesia with fentanyl intravenously and postoperative analgesia with parenteral morphine (GA group) or general anesthesia combined with epidural bupivacaine and epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief (EP group). Analgesia was tested on a visual pain scale. Pulmonary complications were evaluated by clinical complications, blood gas analysis, x-ray film changes, and pulmonary volumes (vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second). Measurements were performed on the day before the operation and on the first 5 postoperative days. In the EP group the pain relief was significantly better on the first day (p less than 0.03). Whatever the criteria used, the rates of pulmonary complications were similar in the two groups: clinical complications 21% versus 26%, radiologic complications 50% versus 64% for GA and EP groups, respectively. Postoperative PaO2 and spirometric values were similar in the two groups. Postoperative epidural analgesia may improve the patient's comfort but does not decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications.     

Epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery provides better postoperative analgesia

Since repeated noxious stimuli may sensitize neuropathic pain receptors of the spinal cord, we tested the hypothesis that the appropriate blockade of surgical stimuli with epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery would be beneficial for postoperative analgesia. Thirty-six adult patients undergoing either elective gastrectomy or open cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either inhalational general anesthesia alone (group G) or epidural anesthesia along with light general anesthesia (group E) throughout the surgery. Postoperative pain management consisted of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with bupivacaine accompanied by the continuous infusion of buprenorphine. To assess postoperative pain, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed at 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. While there was no significant difference in the bupivacaine dose, more patients undergoing gastrectomy in group G required supplemental analgesics than those in group E, and the VAS scores in group E demonstrated significantly better postoperative analgesia compared to group G after both types of surgery. Thus, an appropriate epidural blockade during upper abdominal surgery likely provides better postoperative pain relief.     

麻醉方式和术后镇痛对上腹部手术后早期呼吸功能影响的初步观察

２０例胆囊切除者分为三组，即硬膜外阻滞组、术中全麻术后硬膜外镇痛组及全麻组。三组病术后早期ＦＶＣ、ＦＦＶ１．０、ＰＦ均明显降低，术后硬膜外镇痛组下降最少。全麻术后早期伴有ＰａＯ２下降及ＰＡ－ａＤＯ２升高，术后早期硬膜外镇痛可改善全麻术后早期通气功能及氧合。     

Retentissements de la douleur postopératoire,bénéfices attendus des traitements

Physiological responses to postoperative acute pain may impede organ functions (cardiovascular, pulmonary, coagulation, endocrine, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, etc). Pain alleviation improves patient's comfort, but also may minimise perioperative stress response, physiological responses and postoperative organ dysfunction, assist postoperative nursing and physiotherapy, enhance clinical outcome, and potentially shorten the hospital stay. Potent postoperative analgesia, especially by epidural route, may be associated with reduction in incidence and severity of many perioperative dysfunctions. Peridural analgesia using local anaesthetics is the best technique for decreasing postoperative stress after lower abdominal or lower limb surgery. Analgesia using either epidural or high doses of morphine may improve some cardiac variables such as tachycardia and ischaemia, but does not change the incidence of severe cardiac complications. For patients undergoing vascular or orthopaedic surgery, epidural analgesia can improve clinical outcome by preventing the development of arterial or venous thromboembolic complications. However, in comparative studies, the control groups did not receive adequate prophylactic treatment for thromboembolic complications. Epidural analgesia can hasten the return of gastrointestinal motility and shorten the hospital stay. Postoperative mental dysfunction is decreased using intravenous PCA morphine in the elderly. Epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics improves postoperative respiratory function but, for unknown reasons, these benefits are not associated with a decrease in respiratory complications. On balance, the mode of acute pain relief decreases adverse physiological responses and many intermediate outcome variables; however, there is inconclusive evidence that it affects clinical outcome. Major advances in postoperative recovery can be achieved by early aggressive perioperative care, including potent analgesia, early mobilisation and oral nutrition. As a result, the hospital stay may be shortened.     

Thoracic epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial on length of hospital stay and patient-perceived quality of recovery

BACKGROUND: Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia reduces stress response and pain scores and may improve outcome after cardiac surgery. This prospective, randomized trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia with patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine on postoperative hospital length of stay and patients' perception of their quality of recovery after cardiac surgery. METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to receive either combined thoracic epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia or general anesthesia followed by to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. Postoperative length of stay, time to eligibility for hospital discharge, pain and sedation scores, degree of ambulation, lung volumes, and organ morbidities were evaluated. A validated quality of recovery score was used to measure postoperative health status. RESULTS: Length of stay and time to eligibility for hospital discharge were similar between the groups. Study groups differed neither in postoperative global quality of recovery score nor in five dimensions of quality of recovery score. Time to extubation was shorter (P < 0.001) and consumption of anesthetics was lower in the patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia group. Pain relief, degree of sedation, ambulation, and lung volumes were similar between the study groups. There was a trend for lower incidences of pneumonia (P = 0.085) and confusion (P = 0.10) in the patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia group, whereas cardiac, renal, and neurologic outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elective cardiac surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia followed by patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia offers no major advantage with respect to hospital length of stay, quality of recovery, or morbidity when compared with general anesthesia alone followed by to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine.     

Cardiopulmonary complications after major surgery: a role for epidural analgesia?

Improvement in postoperative pulmonary mechanics with epidural analgesia has been described. Data on the hemodynamic effects of this technique are absent from the surgical literature. To provide such data we have evaluated two groups of patients undergoing aortic reconstruction: group I (n = 25), general anesthesia and group II (n = 6), general anesthesia with adjunctive epidural analgesia. The groups were comparable preoperatively as judged by the incidence of cardiac history, preoperative ejection fraction, and measured hemodynamic parameters. Postoperatively there were no significant differences in the pressure-related parameters; however, rate-related factors including heart rate and double product were significantly decreased in group II with no reduction in cardiac index. Postoperative increases in total body oxygen consumption were also markedly attenuated by epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia reduces the hemodynamic demands on the heart after major surgery and is a useful adjunct, especially in patients with coronary artery disease.     

Comparison of Intravenous or Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia in the Elderly after Major Abdominal Surgery

Background: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using an opioid either alone or in combination with a local anesthetic, are two major advances in the management of pain after major surgery. However, these techniques have been evaluated poorly in elderly people. This prospective, randomized study compared the effectiveness on postoperative pain and safety of PCEA and PCA after major abdominal surgery in the elderly patient.

Methods: Seventy patients older than 70 yr of age and undergoing major abdominal surgery were assigned randomly to receive either combined epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by postoperative PCEA, using a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and sufentanil (PCEA group), or general anesthesia followed by PCA with intravenous morphine (PCA group). Pain intensity was tested three times daily using a visual analog scale. Postoperative evaluation included mental status, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal functions, and patient satisfaction scores.

Results: Pain relief was better at rest (P = 0.001) and after coughing (P = 0.002) in the PCEA group during the 5 postoperative days. Satisfaction scores were better in the PCEA group. Although incidence of delirium was comparable in the PCA and PCEA groups (24%vs. 26%, respectively), mental status was improved on the fourth and fifth postoperative days in the PCEA group. The PCEA group recovered bowel function more quickly than did the PCA group. Cardiopulmonary complications were similar in the two groups.     

Epidural Bupivacaine-Morphine Analgesia versus Patient-controlled Analgesia following Abdominal Aortic Surgery: Analgesic, Respiratory, and Myocardial Effects

Background: The efficacy and effects of epidural analgesia compared with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) have not been reported in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. We compared the effects of epidural bupivacaine-morphine with those of intravenous PCA morphine after elective infrarenal aortic surgery.

Methods: Forty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 2 or 3 received general anesthesia plus postoperative PCA using morphine sulfate (group PCA; n = 21) or general anesthesia plus perioperative epidural morphine - bupivacaine (group EPI; n = 19) during a period of 48 h. During operation, EPI patients received 0.05 mg/kg epidural morphine and 5 ml 0.25% bupivacaine followed by an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.1% morphine (0.1 mg/ml); group PCA received 0.1 mg/kg intravenous morphine sulfate. Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring (V4 and V5 leads) was performed from the night before surgery until 48 h afterward. Respiratory inductive plethysmographic data were recorded after tracheal extubation. Visual analog pain scores at rest and after movement were performed every 4 h after extubation.

Results: Nurse-administered intravenous morphine and time to tracheal extubation were less in group EPI, as were visual analog pain scores at rest and after movement from 20 to 48 h. Complications and the duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay were comparable. There was a similar, low incidence of postoperative apneas, slow respiratory rates, desaturation, and S-T segment depression.     

A comparison of intrathecal opioid and intravenous analgesia for the incidence of cardiovascular,respiratory, and renal complications after abdominal aortic surgery

Major surgery evokes a stress response that can produce deleterious consequences, especially in a population at high risk for those complications. We tested the hypothesis that decreasing or eliminating one of the sources of stress by providing intense analgesia in the immediate postoperative period via application of neuraxial opioids would decrease major nonsurgical complications. Two-hundred-seventeen patients scheduled to undergo abdominal aortic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either general anesthesia alone (control) or general anesthesia combined with intrathecal opioid (1 micro g/kg sufentanil with 8 micro g/kg preservative-free morphine injected at the L4-5 interspace). Postoperative care was identical in the two groups, including patient-controlled analgesia. Each patient provided an assessment of postoperative pain using a visual analog scale. Postopera-tive complications were recorded according to criteria established a priori. The administration of intrathecal opioid provided more intense analgesia than patient-controlled analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was no difference between groups for the incidence of combined major cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications (P > 0.05) or mortality (P > 0.05). The incidence of myocardial damage or infarction, as defined by abnormal plasma concentration of troponin I, did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In patients undergoing major abdominal vascular surgery, decrease of one contributor to postoperative stress, by provision of intense analgesia for the intraoperative and initial postoperative period, via application of neuraxial opioid, does not alter the combined major cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complication rate. IMPLICATIONS: Provision of intense analgesia for the initial postoperative period after major abdominal vascular surgery, via the administration of neuraxial opioid, does not alter the combined incidence of major cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications.     

抗凝病人硬膜外麻醉——三年临床病例分析

目的评价抗凝病人硬膜外麻醉的安全性。方法回顾分析本院2003-2006年107例关节置换或血管成形手术病例。关节置换病人术前12 h应用低分子肝素抗凝,血管成形病人在术中应用肝素抗凝。总共50例病人接受硬膜外麻醉,20例病人接受全麻联合硬膜外麻醉,29例病人接受全麻。结果所有病人均没有发生与硬膜外血肿有关的并发症。发生其它并发症的有10例,其中2例（3．45％）发生在硬膜外组,5例（25％）发生在全麻联合硬膜外组,3例（10．34％）发生在全麻组。结论硬膜外麻醉不是抗凝病人的绝对禁忌。掌握好硬膜外穿刺置管的时机,可以避免发生硬膜外血肿的风险。硬膜外麻醉在多方面优于全麻。     

不同术后镇痛方式对手术患者恢复期心肌缺血的影响

目的研究硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛对手术患者恢复期心肌缺血的影响。方法39例行择期腹部手术的患者随机分成两组:硬膜外镇痛组(R组),16例,术中全麻复合硬膜外麻醉,术后硬膜外镇痛;静脉镇痛组(M组),23例,术中全麻,术后静脉吗啡镇痛。维持两组Price-Henry疼痛评分≤3分。所有患者接受24 h动态心电图监测48 h。两组患者在入手术室安静平卧10 min、入SICU后2 h、术后第1天晨、术后第2天晨采集静脉血测定皮质醇浓度。结果术后48 h内,R组心肌缺血发生率比M组低(P<0.05),在术后各时点,R组的皮质醇浓度低于M组(P<0.05)。结论与静脉镇痛相比较,硬膜外镇痛明显减轻应激反应,减少术后心肌缺血发生率。     

硬膜外超前镇痛对上腹部手术病人应激反应的影响

目的 比较硬膜外超前镇痛和术后硬膜外镇痛对上腹部手术病人应激反应的影响.方法 择期全麻下拟行上腹部手术的病人30例,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,随机分为2组(n=15):术后硬膜外镇痛组(C组)和硬膜外超前镇痛组(P组).于T_(10,11)间隙行硬膜外穿刺并置管.P组切皮前20 min时硬膜外注射0.5 μg/ml舒芬太尼+0.15%罗哌卡因混合液15 ml,30 min后接镇痛4泵,以5 ml/h的速率硬膜外输注250 ml.C组病人术后硬膜外注射0.5μg/ml舒芬太尼+0.15%罗哌卡因混合液15 ml,30 min后接镇痛泵,以5 ml/h的速率硬膜外输注250 ml.于硬膜外穿刺前(T_0),术后2 h(T_1)和18 h(T_2)时,采集静脉血样6 ml,测定血浆促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)浓度和血清皮质醇(Cor)、C反应蛋白(CRP)的浓度.结果 与T0时比较,两组,T1和T2时血清Cor、CRP的浓度和血浆ACTH浓度均升高(P<0.01);与C组比较,P组T1和T2时血清Cor、CRP的浓度和血浆ACTH浓度均降低(P<0.05).结论 与术后硬膜外镇痛相比,硬膜外超前镇痛可更好地抑制上腹部手术病人术后应激反应.