Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Ostial Lesions of the Left Anterior Descending Artery

We evaluated the effectiveness of Cutting Balloon angioplasty for ostial lesions of the left anterior descending artery compared with conventional balloon angioplasty. Cutting Balloon angioplasty (n = 7) produced larger acute gain (1.70 ± 0.37 vs 0.48 ± 0.25 mm, P < 0.001) and smaller late loss index (0.54 ± 0.55 vs 1.32 ± 0.81, P < 0.05) than conventional balloon angioplasty (n = 7). As a result, late restenosis was seen in only two patients undergoing Cutting Balloon angioplasty, but in all seven patients undergoing conventional balloon angioplasty. Ostial lesions of the left anterior descending artery may be one of the suitable targets of Cutting Balloon angioplasty . (J Interven Cardiol 2000;13:7–14)     

A simple technique to cross mitral valve during percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty

A 43-yr-old man with mild, fixed obstruction of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and severe, uncontrolled variant angina underwent placement of an endovascular stent to preserve patency of the artery. The decision for stent placement was based on several factors, including refractoriness to medical treatment and standard balloon angioplasty, documented spasm localized to the proximal LAD lesion, and the morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with the surgical approach in this type of patient. At follow-up, there was moderate restenosis of the stented coronary segment; the vasospastic angina syndrome had totally resolved. © Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Achieving optimal results with standard balloon angioplasty: can baseline and angiographic variables predict stent-like outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: To predict which patients might not require stent implantation, we identified clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with repeat revascularization after standard balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Stents reduce the risk of repeat revascularization but are costly and may lead to in-stent restenosis, which remains difficult to treat. Identification of patients at low risk for repeat revascularization may allow clinicians to reserve stents for patients most likely to benefit. METHODS: Data from five interventional trials (5,146 patients) were pooled for analysis. We identified patients with optimal angiographic results (final diameter stenosis < or =30% and no dissection) after balloon angioplasty and determined the multivariable predictors of repeat revascularization. RESULTS: Optimal angiographic results were achieved in 18% of patients after angioplasty. The repeat revascularization rate at six months was lower for patients with optimal results (20% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) but still higher than observed in stent trials. Independent predictors of repeat revascularization were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, p = 0.01), lesion length > or =10 mm (OR 1.62, p = 0.03) and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions (OR 1.62, p = 0.03). For the 8% of patients with optimal angiographic results and none of these risk factors, the repeat revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates were 14% and 8% respectively, similar to rates after stent implantation. Cost analysis estimated that $78 million per year might be saved in the U.S. with a provisional stenting strategy using these criteria compared with elective stenting. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of baseline characteristics and angiographic results can be used to identify a small group of patients at very low risk for repeat revascularization after balloon angioplasty. Provisional stenting for these low risk patients could substantially reduce costs without compromising clinical outcomes.     

Ten-year follow-up of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in 351 patients

Objectives. We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term results of balloon angioplasty for stenoses in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery.Background. Both the supposedly high rate of acute complications and relatively poor long-term results of balloon angioplasty for stenoses in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery have led to a search for alternative interventional techniques.Methods. We analyzed the success rates and long-term follow-up results in 351 consecutive patients who underwent balloon angioplasty for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery proximal to its first side branch. The power of the study was >80% in detecting a difference of 9% in the proportion of patients who survived at 10 years, assuming an 80% survival rate in the control group.Results. There were 60 ostial and 291 nonostial stenoses. Follow-up lasted a median of 85 months (range 0 to 137) and was 100% complete. The angiographic success rate was 90.9%. The clinical success rate was 86.3%. Nine patients (2.6%) died, 17 (4.8%) needed emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and 10 (2.8%) developed a myocardial infarction. Several patients had subsequent complications. The success and complication rates were not significantly different for patients with ostial and nonostial stenoses. Ten years after balloon angioplasty, freedom from mortality was 80%, freedom from cardiac death was 87%, freedom from myocardial infarction was 84%, freedom from vessel-related reinterventions was 66%, and freedom from angina pectoris was 33%. There were more reinterventions for ostial stenoses, with a 1-year relative risk of ostial versus nonostial stenoses for related reinterventions of 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1 to 2.8, p = 0.049).Conclusions. More than 10 years ago, balloon angioplasty for stenoses in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, either ostial or nonostial, had a high success rate. Although the long-term results are satisfactory, ostial stenoses are associated with a higher early clinical restenosis rate requiring more reinterventions.     

Randomized trials of directional coronary atherectomy: Implications for clinical practice and future investigation

Objectives. This study compared and contrasted the randomized trials of directional atherectomy and coronary angioplasty for de novo native coronary artery lesions.Background. The results of two randomized trials, the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) and the Canadian Coronary Atherectomy Trial (CCAT), comparing initial and intermediate-term outcome of directional coronary atherectomy and conventional coronary angioplasty in de novo native vessels, have been reported. In CAVEAT any coronary artery segment that could be by either technique was included; in CCAT only nonostial proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses were studied.Methods. The primary end point was 6-month angiographic restenosis. Clinical outcome end points at 6 months included death, myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery and abrupt closure.Results. Initial angiographic success rates were significantly improved with directional coronary atherectomy compared with conventional angioplasty (89% vs. 80% for CAVEAT; 98% vs. 91% for CCAT). Also, the initial improvement in minimal lumen diameter and final immediate postprocedural residual diameter stenosis were better with atherectomy. In CCAT, there was no difference in initial complications; in CAVEAT, non-Q wave myocardial infarction rates and abrupt closure were increased with atherectomy. Despite improved success rates and better lumen achieved with atherectomy, in CCAT there was no difference in angiographic restenosis (46% for directional atherectomy vs. 43% for angioplasty). In CAVEAT, in a prespecified subset analysis involving the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, restenosis was both significantly and clinically less for directional atherectomy (51% vs. 63%). For non-left anterior descending coronary artery segments, there was no difference.Conclusions. These studies document the difference between achievement of an excellent initial angiographic result and the longer term issue of clinical restenosis. Widespread use of directional coronary atherectomy to treat lesions that would be well treated by angioplasty in an attempt to decrease restenosis rates substantially does not appear indicated by the data. In individual lesions, directional atherectomy should be selected with the view toward optimizing initial results. Further trials are needed to determine whether more aggressive or better targeted directional coronary atherectomy may improve not only the initial gain but the long-term outcome as well.     

Re-angioplasty of in-stent restenosis versus balloon restenoses--a matched pair comparison

BACKGROUND: Despite different biological mechanisms involved in the restenotic process of in-stent restenosis and restenosis after balloon angioplasty alone, the occurrence of a second restenosis has been reported in the same range. There are no data available comparing the outcome after re-angioplasty of such lesions. We analyzed in a matched pair comparison the clinical outcome and angiographic long-term result of patients with balloon angioplasty of a first in-stent restenosis versus patients with balloon re-angioplasty of a first balloon restenosis. METHODS: Both groups consisted of 74 lesions matched by treated vessel, lesion location differentiated in proximal and non-proximal, and angiographic appearance of coronary artery disease differentiated in singular stenosis, diffuse or mixed pattern. Clinical follow-up was 100%. Angiographic follow-up was 78.4% after median 174 days. RESULTS: Angiographic restenosis rate in matched pairs of patients (n=46/74) was significantly higher in the balloon restenosis group (41.3%, n=19/46) compared to the in-stent restenosis group (21.7%, n=10/46, p<0.042). There was no death or myocardial infarction. After clinical follow-up, target lesion revascularization rate was significantly lower in the in-stent restenosis group compared to the balloon restenosis group (12.1%, n=9/74 versus 27.0%, n=20/74; difference between groups 14.9%, 95% confidence interval 2.0-27.3%, p<0.023). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed as predictors for a second restenosis unstable angina pectoris, non-proximal lesion, restenosis after balloon angioplasty and the occurrence of the first restenosis within 90 days after initial intervention. CONCLUSION: Clinical and angiographic outcome after balloon angioplasty of a first in-stent restenosis was significantly better compared with balloon re-angioplasty of a first balloon restenosis.     

Management of a broken guiding catheter tip: Cut and fix technique

A 49-year-old male presented with class III exertional angina, 1 year after angioplasty of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and right coronary artery. Coronary angiogram revealed 90% in-stent restenosis (ISR) in mid-LAD with angiographic impression of stent fracture. Optical coherence tomographic evaluation of mid-LAD ISR showed a distinct 3 mm long “eclipse sign” indicating embolized, broken guiding catheter tip as a cause of ISR, which was confirmed on reviewing 1-year-old angiographic images. This was managed with “cut and fix technique” using cutting balloon and another drug-eluting stent. Optical coherence tomographic at 9 months showed well endothelialized stent with a thin layer of neo-intimal hyperplasia over the sandwiched broken guiding tip.     

Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate

Objectives. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis.Background. Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear.Methods. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate.Results. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (≥ 10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16 ± 7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98 ± 0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10 ± 3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19 ± 0.60 mm vs. 1.75 ± 0.68 mm (p = 0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p = 0.046.Conclusions. Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Randomized study to compare balloon angioplasty and elective stent implantation in venous bypass grafts: the Venestent study.

The aim of the study was to compare acute and long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of balloon angioplasty and elective stenting in de novo lesions in the body of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 150 patients, with de novo lesions in SVG, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty or elective Wiktor I stent implantation. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.8% in the balloon group and 19.1% in the stent group (P = 0.069). At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization rate was 31.4% vs. 14.5% (P < 0.05), and event-free survival was 60.0% vs. 76.3% (P < 0.05) for the balloon and stent group, respectively. Elective stent implantation in de novo SVG lesions is associated with a significant lower target vessel revascularization rate and a significant higher event-free survival at 1-year follow-up as compared to balloon angioplasty.     

Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START): a four-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that stent implantation in de novo coronary artery lesions would result in lower restenosis rates and better long-term clinical outcomes than balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Placement of an intracoronary stent, as compared with balloon angioplasty, has proven to reduce the rate of restenosis. However, the long-term clinical benefit of stenting over angioplasty has not been assessed in large randomized trials. METHODS: We randomly assigned 452 patients with either stable (129 patients) or unstable (323 patients) angina pectoris to elective stent implantation (229 patients) or standard balloon angioplasty (223 patients). Coronary angiography was performed at baseline, immediately after the procedure and six months later. End points were the rate of restenosis at six months and a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization over four years of follow-up. RESULTS: Procedural success rate was achieved in 84% and 95% (balloon angioplasty vs. stent, respectively). The increase in the minimal luminal diameter was greater in the stent group both after the intervention (2.02 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 1.43 +/- 0.6 mm in the angioplasty group; p < 0.0001), and at six-month follow-up (1.98 +/- 0.7 mm vs. 1.63 +/- 0.7 mm; p < 0.001). The corresponding restenosis rates were 22% and 37%, respectively (p < 0.002). After four years, no differences in mortality (2.7% vs. 2.4%) and nonfatal MI (2.2% vs. 2.8%) were found between the stent and the angioplasty groups, respectively. However, the requirement for further revascularization procedures of the target lesions was significantly reduced in the stent group (12% vs. 25% in the angioplasty group; relative risk 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.75, p = 0.0006); most of the repeat procedures (84%) were carried out within six months of entry into the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received an intracoronary stent showed a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with conventional balloon angioplasty. The benefit of stenting was maintained four years after implantation, as manifested by a significant reduction in the need for repeat revascularization.     

Malignant restenosis after primary successful excimer laser coronary angioplasty

In a series of 20 coronary excimer laser angioplasties, two patients presented with a peculiar type of malignant restenosis 6 and 8 weeks after a successful laser angioplasty procedure. One patient had a successful recanalization of an occluded left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and the second patient had a successful angioplasty of a subtotal proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. After the procedure, no ischemia could be demonstrated by exercise ECG and thallium scintigraphy. Both patients were free of angina until the sudden development of nocturnal angina several hours before reangiography, which showed subtotal restenosis in both cases. One patient had a mammaria graft on the LAD and the second patient underwent a successful balloon angioplasty. This uncommon sudden and malignant development of restenosis seems to be related to the excimer laser angioplasty procedure and warrants some caution with the indiscriminative use of this new angioplasty procedure.     

Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries.

AIMS: Angioplasty of lesions in small coronary arteries remains a significant problem because of the increased risk of restenosis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of elective coronary stent placement and optimal balloon angioplasty in small vessel disease. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with lesions in small coronary arteries (de novo, non-ostial lesion and reference diameter <3 mm) were randomly assigned to either balloon angioplasty or elective stent placement (7-cell NIR stent). The primary end-point was restenosis at 6 months follow-up. Optimal balloon angioplasty was defined as diameter stenosis less than or = 30% and the absence of major dissection after the angioplasty, and crossover to stenting was allowed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. Procedure was successful in all patients, and in-hospital events did not occur in any patient. However, 12 patients in the angioplasty group were stented because of suboptimal results or major dissection. Postprocedural lumen diameter was significantly larger in the stent group than in the angioplasty group (2.44 +/- 0.36 mm vs 2.14 +/- 0.36, P<0.05, respectively), but late loss was greater in the stent group (1.12 +/- 0.67 mm vs 0.63 +/- 0.48, P<0.01, respectively). The angiographic restenosis rate was 30.9% in the angioplasty group, and 35.7% in the stent group (P = ns). Clinical follow-up was available in all patients (15.9 +/- 5.7 months) and clinical events during the follow-up were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that optimal balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting may be a reasonable approach for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries.     

Stenting for treatment of coronary vasospasm

Following an acute anterior myocardial infarction, a 56-yr-old female underwent two balloon angioplasty procedures for a recurrent proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. She had recurrent angina pectoris. Angiography showed a noncritical restenosis with marked provocable superimposed vasospasm. Despite repeat balloon dilatation and stenting of the lesion, she developed recurrent symptoms. One month later, angiography showed progressive fixed disease and reversible spasm proximal and distal to, but not involving, the stented arterial segment. She underwent single-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting, and is asymptomatic at 6-mo follow-up. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the very proximal left anterior descending artery lesions: immediate results and follow-up

In order to assess the results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the proximal (before the first septal branch) left anterior descending artery lesions, we analyzed the results in 206 consecutive patients, aged 56 +/- 12 years. The distance of the lesion from the origin of the left anterior descending artery was measured in the right oblique angiogram. The location of the lesions proved to be very proximal (less than 0.5 cm from the origin) in 22 patients, intermediate (0.5-1 cm from the origin) in 26 patients and distal (greater than 1 cm from the origin) in 158 patients. The initial angiographic success rate was similar among the 3 groups of patients: 95.8% in those with very proximal and intermediate lesions and 98.1% in those with distal lesions. Occlusive dissection of the left anterior descending artery without involvement of the mainstem occurred in 3.8% of the patients with intermediate lesions and in 1.9% of those with distal lesions. No complications occurred in any patient with very proximal lesions. The clinical follow-up was 25.2 +/- 12 months; angina recurred in 15.5% (31 out of 206 patients). Coronary angiography was performed in 103 patients. Restenosis occurred in 42.3% of the patients with very proximal and intermediate lesions (11 out of 26) and 31.2% of those with distal lesions (24 out of 77). In conclusion, in most patients with very proximal and intermediate lesions of left anterior descending artery, coronary angioplasty can be performed with low risk. The location of the lesion in the proximal portion of left anterior descending artery does not affect the overall success rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A case report of late coronary stent thrombosis manifested as acute myocardial infarction 19 months after stenting

A 63-year-old Japanese man was readmitted to our hospital due to acute broad-anterior myocardial infarction (AMI). The proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) at the prior stent, which was implanted 19 months earlier and in which no angiographic restenosis was recognized 13 months before the second study, was totally occluded. After crossing a guide wire and balloon angioplasty, angiographic radiolucency was observed at the prior stent, suggesting that AMI was induced by late coronary stent thrombosis. Intravascular ultrasound performed 19 days after the onset of AMI revealed superficial calcification without significant stenosis and an atherosclerotic plaque distal to the stent that was not significantly changed compared to 19 months previously, consistent with the culprit lesion being an intrastent site. AMI may thus be induced by late coronary stent thrombosis during long-term clinical follow-up without clinical symptoms or angiographic restenosis at the second study.     

Randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus silicon carbon-coated stent implantation for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries

The objectives of this study were to compare the short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of conventional balloon angioplasty versus elective silicon carbide-coated stent implantation in de novo lesions in small coronary arteries (<3.0 mm). Angioplasty of small coronary arteries is associated with high restenosis rates. The beneficial effects of stent implantation on restenosis rates and clinical outcomes have been suggested by observational studies. However, randomized trials comparing balloon angioplasty with stenting show conflicting results. A total of 496 patients with a de novo stenosis in a coronary artery, with a diameter between 2.0 and 3.0 mm, were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty (n = 246) or stent implantation (n = 250). One-year clinical and 6-month angiographic follow-up were performed. Baseline characteristics were similar for the 2 groups, with 16% having diabetes and 77% complex lesions (type B or C). Crossover to stents occurred in 29% of patients randomized to balloon angioplasty. At 6 months, angiographic restenosis rates were 25% versus 21% for the angioplasty and stent groups, respectively (p = NS). One-year clinical follow-up showed no difference in occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. Elective silicon carbon-coated stent implantation in small coronary arteries is safe and effective, with no beneficial effect on angiographic or clinical outcome compared with balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the left coronary artery in patients with chronic occlusion of the right coronary artery: clinical and functional results.

The safety and therapeutic benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the left circumflex coronary artery or both were assessed in 61 patients with chronic (greater than 3 months) occlusion of the right coronary artery. Recanalization of the right coronary artery was not performed before dilatation of left coronary artery lesions. All lesions could be dilated without an acute ischemic event in the catheterization laboratory. However, three patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery within the first 8 days after coronary angioplasty. There were no in-hospital deaths. Of the remaining 58 patients, 51 (88%) had repeat angiography at a mean of 5.2 +/- 2.5 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (n = 17) or absence (n = 34) of restenosis defined as greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis at the dilated site. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The mean value for angina functional class at follow-up was significantly better in the group without than in the group with restenosis (0.4 +/- 0.6 vs 2.1 +/- 1.1, respectively; p less than 0.001). Sixty-five percent of the patients without restenosis were asymptomatic at follow-up. Seventy-five percent of the predicted maximal physical capacity was reached by 76% of the patients without restenosis compared with 33% in the group with restenosis (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Angioplasty of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: initial success and long-term follow-up.

From 1984 to 1987, 537 consecutive patients (mean age 58 years; range 34 to 79) underwent angioplasty for proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease. The procedure was clinically successful in 516 (96.1%). Procedural complications included myocardial infarction (2.2%; Q wave 0.9%, non-Q wave 1.3%), in-hospital bypass surgery (3%) and death (0.4%). Follow-up was obtained in 534 patients (99.8%) for a mean duration of 44 months (range 8 to 75). Follow-up cardiac catheterization, performed in 391 patients (76%), demonstrated a 39.6% angiographic restenosis rate. Ninety-eight (19%) of the patients with a clinically successful result required additional revascularization for recurrent left anterior descending artery disease by angioplasty (12.8%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (4.7%), or both (1.5%). During follow-up there was a 2.5% incidence rate of myocardial infarction (anterior myocardial infarction 1.6%), and 27 patients (5.2%) died, 14 (2.7%) of cardiac causes. The actuarial 5-year cardiac survival rate was 97%, freedom from cardiac death and myocardial infarction was 94% and freedom from cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery and repeat left anterior descending artery angioplasty was 77%. At last follow-up 76% of patients were free of angina and 88% reported sustained functional improvement. Angioplasty is an effective treatment for proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease that has a high success rate, low incidence of procedural complications and provides excellent long-term cardiac survival, freedom from cardiac events and sustained functional improvement.     

Multiple stent implantation in single coronary arteries: Acute results and six-month angiographic follow-up

A total of 147 stents were implanted (in overlapping manner in 76% of vessels) in a single coronary artery in 59 patients (60 vessels, 97 lesions, 2.45 stents/vessel) over a period of 18 mo using high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance. The indications for stenting were suboptimal percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) result (45%), primary prevention of restenosis (44%), acute closure (10%), and restenosis after plain balloon angioplasty (1%). One patient required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (extensive dissection), and one required early intervention with plain balloon angioplasty and intracoronary urokinase for stent thrombosis. There were no deaths. Thirteen patients had recurrence of angina within 6 mo and angiograms were performed in all. These showed intrastent restenosis in nine (all had successful repeat plain balloon angioplasty), development of new disease in other vessels along with restenosis close to the stent in the target vessel in one (underwent elective CABG) and normal angiograms with widely patent stents in three. Forty-five patients (77%) remained free of recurrent angina and 25 of these had follow-up angiograms (56%) at a mean of 172 days, two showing restenosis. Thus, the restenosis rate per patient in the symptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 100%) was 77% and in the asymptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 56%) was 8%. The restenosis rate in the subgroup with bailout stenting (n = 6) was 20% (angiographic follow-up in 83%). The overall restenosis rate per patient was 32% (overall angiographic follow-up in 66%). During the 6-mo follow-up period, one patient underwent elective CABG (1.7%), one sustained a non-Q myocardial infarction (1.7%), nine had repeat PTCA to the target vessel (15.5%), and there were no deaths. The event-free survival rate was 77%. Multiple stent implantation aided by high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance and with adjunctive optimal antiplatelet therapy without oral anticoagulation seems to be a useful and effective revascularisation strategy to deal with long lesions and acute dissections with a high procedural success rate. The restenosis rate is acceptable and is not appreciably high as reported in previous studies from the “warfarin era.” Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 42:158–165, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Results of angioplasty (with or without stent) at the site of a narrowed coronary anastomosis of the left internal mammary artery graft or via the internal mammary artery

During the past 6 years, 50 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of a narrowed coronary anastomosis of a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft or PTCA of a left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis via LIMA grafts at the investigators' institution. The success rate was high at 88%. Thirty-four of the 44 successfully treated patients (77%) underwent repeat angiography, which showed restenosis in 14 patients (41%). In cases of stent implantation at the coronary LIMA graft anastomosis angioplasty site, the restenosis rate was 80%, but it was only 14% in cases of pure balloon dilation (p = 0.001). Therefore, in cases of coronary LIMA graft anastomosis, stent implantation should be avoided, because it implicates an excessively high restenosis rate.