Phase I trial of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel,cisplatin and S-1 (TPS) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer

Background: We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (TPS) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC).Patients and methods: Treatment consisted of docetaxel (Taxotere) at doses of 50, 60, and 70 mg/m²; cisplatin at 70 mg·m²/day on day 1; and S-1 twice daily on days 1–14 at doses of 40, 60, and 80 mg·m²/day, repeated every 3 or 4 weeks.Results: Forty patients were enrolled. MTD was not reached until level 4. Subjects at expanded dose were limited to patients with locally advanced disease. Two dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) were observed at dose level 5 (TPS: 70/70/80 mg·m²/day, every 3 weeks), namely one grade 3 infection and one grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, establishing this as the MTD. Of 12 patients treated at dose level 6 (TPS: 70/70/60 mg·m²/day, every 3 weeks), 2 DLTs were seen. Six achieved a complete response and 22 a partial response, giving a response rate of 70%.Conclusions: TPS was well tolerated. The recommended phase II dose as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced HNC was determined as 70/70/60 mg·m²/day every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity was highly promising and warrants further investigation.     

Randomized controlled phase II comparison study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil versus CCRT with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate and leucovorin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

We compared concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) with CCRT with CDDP, 5-FU, methotrexate and leucovorin (PFML) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in terms of safety and efficacy on survival. A total of 100 patients were enrolled. The TPF group received CCRT with the TPF regimen [docetaxel (50 mg/m²: day 1), CDDP (60 mg/m²: day 4), and continuous 5-FU infusion (600 mg/m²/day: days 1–5)]. In the PFML group, patients received CCRT with the PFML regimen [CDDP (60 mg/m²: day 4)], continuous 5-FU infusion (600 mg/m²/day: days 1–5), methotrexate (30 mg/m²: day 1) and leucovorin (20 mg/m²/day: days 1–5)]. Both groups received 2 cycles of chemotherapy during definitive radiotherapy. The total radiation dose was between 66.6 and 70.2 Gray. The overall response rates after CCRT were 98 with 90% of a pathologically complete response (pCR) in the TPF group and 94 with 77% in the PFML group. For grade 3/4 adverse events, mucositis was more frequent in the PMFL group, and the TPF group showed a higher incidence of hematological toxicity. CCRT with TPF or PMFL for advanced SCCHN was tolerable and produced excellent survival rates.     

Combination chemotherapy of S-1 and taxanes in Korea

Various combination treatments incorporating S-1 are undergoing clinical trials in Korea, especially combinations with taxane, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan. In a phase I study to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel in combination with S-1 administered at a fixed dose of 40 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 of each 3-week cycle in patients with advanced gastric cancer, 60 mg/m² docetaxel was declared to be the maximum tolerated dose. A phase I/II study of the same schedule of combination chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel reported doses of S-1/docetaxel of 40/75 mg/m² as the maximum tolerated dose. In a phase I study of S-1 plus weekly docetaxel, the patients received variable doses of docetaxel administered intravenously over 1 h on days 1 and 8 and S-1 administered on days 1–14 of each 3-week cycle. The maximum-tolerated doses of S-1 and docetaxel were determined to be 45 mg/m² and 35 mg/m² in this study. A phase I/II study of docetaxel plus S-1 combination chemotherapy from Korea reported a response rate of 43.3%. Also, a phase II study of paclitaxel plus S-1 as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or relapsed gastric cancer showed an overall response rate of 49%. The most frequent significant toxicities in combination chemotherapies with taxane plus S-1 were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. However, nonhematological toxicities were mild to moderate. A taxane plus S-1 combination regimen could be a new standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer, given its significant activity and favorable toxicity pattern.     

A phase I study of 3-day topotecan and cisplatin in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: The aim of this phase I study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and methods: Patients aged over 75 years with previously untreated SCLC were enrolled in this study. Both topotecan and cisplatin were administered on days 1–3 and repeated every 3 weeks. The starting dose of topotecan was 0.5 mg/m²/day, while cisplatin was fixed at the dose of 20 mg/m²/day. Patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC received thoracic irradiation after the completion of chemotherapy. Results: Twenty-one elderly patients were enrolled in this study and received a total of 59 cycles. The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia and non-hematological toxicities including diarrhea were generally mild and reversible. The MTD of topotecan was determined as 1.2 mg/m²/day. The recommended phase II study dose of topotecan was determined as 1.0 mg/m²/day with cisplatin 20 mg/m²/day daily for 3 days. An objective response was observed in 6 of 10 patients (60%) with LD-SCLC and 6 of 11 (55%) with extensive disease (ED) SCLC. The median survival time in patients with LD-SCLC and those with ED-SCLC were 16.0 and 11.0 months, respectively. Conclusion: The combination chemotherapy of 3-day topotecan and cisplatin appears to be tolerable and effective in elderly patients with SCLC.     

Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer patients followed by concomitant docetaxel‐based radiochemotherapy

MENCOBONI M., GRILLO‐RUGGIERI F., SALAMI A., SCASSO F., REBELLA L., GRIMALDI A., DELLEPIANE M., MORATTI G., BRUZZONE A., SPIGNO F., GHIO R. & FIGLIOMENI M. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care
Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer patients followed by concomitant docetaxel‐based radiochemotherapy Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with inoperable squamous cell head and neck carcinoma. More recently, induction chemotherapy has been adopted as an approach in the management of these patients. We report the results of a phase II trial associating induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy in a series of patients with inoperable squamous cell head and neck cancer. Twenty‐nine patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma ineligible for surgery were enrolled. Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m² every 21 days was administered for two cycles. Radiotherapy followed the induction phase. During radiotherapy, docetaxel was administered weekly at the dose of 33 mg/m². Primary end point of the study was feasibility of treatment. Six (18%) patients failed to conclude the treatment schedule. Although response rates in evaluable patients were very high (disease control rate >90%), toxicities were a matter of concern. The reported treatment schedule proved infeasible. However, some modifications in ancillary therapies aimed at exploiting its efficacy could make it practicable.     

Comparison of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by radiation vs concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

AimsTo compare the effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by radiation with that of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).Materials and methodsIn a group of patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by radiation, 15 patients received two cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel 60 mg/m², cisplatin 70 mg/m² and 5-day 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 750 mg/m²/day. Radiotherapy was begun 21 days after completing chemotherapy. In the group receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 19 patients received two cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel 50 mg/m², cisplatin 60 mg/m², and 5-day 5-FU 600 mg/m²/day. Radiation was begun on the first day of chemotherapy. The total radiation dose was between 63 and 74 Gy.ResultsOverall response rate (partial and complete response — both 100%) and complete response rate (87% and 84%) were similar, but, in overall survival, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF was better than induction chemotherapy with TPF followed by radiation. Mucositis and anaemia were more frequent in the group receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but the group receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF improved overall survival.ConclusionsThis is a small non-randomised comparison. The effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF was better than that of induction chemotherapy with TPF followed by radiation.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

More effective protocols are needed for unresectable and recurrent esophageal cancer. Therefore, we conducted a phase I trial to establish the recommended dose of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DNF) as combination chemotherapy. Fourteen patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled and received DNF combination therapy at different dose levels according to the treatment and examination plan. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included febrile neutropenia. DLTs occurred in 3/5 patients at level 4. The recommended doses (level 3) of DNF were 60 mg/m² (day 1), 70 mg/m² (day 1), and 700 mg/m² (days 1–5), respectively, given at 3-week intervals. In conclusion, DNF combined chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer was associated with relatively minor adverse events and was safely administered at the recommended dose. A phase II study is now underway.     

Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel,cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy with cetuximab for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PurposeTo determine the efficacy and feasibility of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and cetuximab (C) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.Patients and methodsForty-nine previously untreated patients with local advanced stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) received three courses of ICT consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m² day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m² day 1 and infusional 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m²/day on days 1–5 followed by radiotherapy plus C at 250 mg/m²/week (after an initial loading dose of 400 mg/m²).ResultsAfter completion of ICT 44 of 49 patients received radiotherapy plus C. Three months after therapy completion tumour response was observed in 33 patients and after two years, 25 patients were in complete remission (CR). The most common grade 4 toxicity during the whole treatment period was dermatitis (30%), followed by mucositis (27%) and neutropenia (17%) without fever. One toxic related death was observed during ICT. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 59% and two-year overall survival (OS) rate was 63%, respectively.ConclusionConcurrent radiotherapy plus C after three courses of ICT was feasible and was associated with promising CR, PFS and OS rates. Further optimisation of dose and sequence is warranted.     

Comparison of hyperfractionation and conventional fractionation radiotherapy with concurrent docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

Purpose Radiotherapy (RTx) has been considered as the treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). However, with only conventional fractionation (Cfx), response rates are relatively low. In this study, we report the results of hyperfractionation (Hfx) RTx with concurrent docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with locally advanced SCCHN and compare Hfx and Cfx RTx with concurrent TPF CTx. Methods Fifty patients with previously untreated stage III–IV SCCHN were entered into this study. Eligible patients received RTx delivered using arm 1: Hfx at 1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week to 76.8 Gy/64 fractions, and arm 2: Cfx at 2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week to 70 Gy/35 fractions. Patients received 2 cycles CTx every 4 weeks. The doses were docetaxel 50 mg/m² (day 1), cisplatin 60 mg/m² (day 4), and 5-FU 600 mg/m²/day (days 1–5). Results The overall clinical response rate and the pathological CR were 100% (25/25) and 84% (21/25) in arm 1, and 100% (25/25) and 80% (20/25) in arm 2. Local–regional control was better significant in arm 1 than arm 2 (P = 0.048). There were also trend toward improved disease-free survival (P = 0.059) and overall survival (P = 0.078) in arm 1. Mucositis was significantly more frequent in arm 1 (P = 0.048). Conclusion There were trend toward improved local–regional control, disease-free survival and overall survival in Hfx RTx with concurrent TPF CTx, compared to Cfx RTx with concurrent TPF CTx.     

A randomized phase III trial of oral S-1 plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: TCOG0701 CATS trial

BackgroundPlatinum-based two-drug combination chemotherapy has been standard of care for patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced NSCLC between the two chemotherapy regimens. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and quality of life (QoL).Patients and methodsPatients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and adequate organ function were randomized to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1–21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 8 every 4–5 weeks, or docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 every 3–4 weeks, both up to six cycles.ResultsA total of 608 patients from 66 sites in Japan were randomized to S-1 plus cisplatin (n = 303) or docetaxel plus cisplatin (n = 305). OS for oral S-1 plus cisplatin was noninferior to docetaxel plus cisplatin [median survival, 16.1 versus 17.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 1.013; 96.4% confidence interval (CI) 0.837–1.227]. Significantly higher febrile neutropenia (7.4% versus 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% versus 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% versus 5.3%), and grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% versus 12.3%) were observed in the docetaxel plus cisplatin than in the S-1 plus cisplatin. There were no differences found in PFS or response between the two arms. QoL data investigated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13 favored the S-1 plus cisplatin.ConclusionOral S-1 plus cisplatin is not inferior to docetaxel plus cisplatin and is better tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.Clinical trial numberUMIN000000608.     

Analysis of efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate and leucovorin (PFML) and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) (PFML) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Methods Seventy-seven patients with previously untreated stages III–IV SCCHN were included in this trial. Patients received two cycles of chemotherapy repeated every 4 weeks. The chemotherapy regimen consisted CDDP (60 mg/m², day 4), 5-FU (600 mg/m² given over 24 h for 5 days, days 1–5), MTX (30 mg/m², day 1) and LV (20 mg/m², days 1–5). Radiation was targeted to begin on the starting day of chemotherapy, day 1. The total radiation dose to the primary site and neck lymph nodes was 70.0 Gy. When grade ≥3 toxicities were observed frequently, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were delayed or reduced. Results The main toxicities were mucositis (grade ≥3, 39%), leukocytopenia (grade ≥3, 34%) and neutropenia (grade ≥3, 30%). The overall clinical response rate and the pathological complete response (CR) were 94% (72/77) and 71% (55/77). The primary site CR and neck lymph node CR were 79% (61/77) and 85% (44/52), and 3-year survival rate was 73%. Conclusions This concurrent chemoradiotherapy with PFML was safe and well tolerated. The high CR rate justifies further evaluation of this chemoradiotherapy modality in locally advanced SCCHN patients.     

A phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Recent studies of docetaxel have demonstrated improved survival over mitoxantrone and prednisone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), supporting the study of novel docetaxel-containing regimens as primary therapy or following initial docetaxel-based therapy. To evaluate the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with HRPC, 40 patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with progressive metastatic disease despite androgen ablation were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 4 days starting 1 day prior to the docetaxel infusion. After the first three patients were enrolled, filgrastim was added on days 2–6 and 9–13. Of the 40 patients enrolled, 19 had no prior chemotherapy and 21 had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Of the 19 patients without prior chemotherapy and the 21 with prior chemotherapy, 7 (37%) and 6 (29%) , respectively, demonstrated a decrease in prostate specific antigen by >50% maintained for at least 4 weeks. Out of eight patients with measurable disease, one achieved a partial response and four demonstrated stable disease. There was one patient with deep vein thrombosis, and febrile neutropenia was noted in only three patients after the protocol was modified to include filgrastim support. The combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine with filgrastim was well tolerated and active against HRPC in patients with or without prior chemotherapy.This trial was supported in part by research grants from Aventis, Amgen, and P30 CA72720-01-03.     

Phase I trial of combined chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).Methods Patients received two cycles of chemotherapy repeated every 4 weeks. Starting doses (dose level 0) were: docetaxel 60mg/m², cisplatin 60mg/m², and 5-day continuous infusion 5-FU 600mg/m² per day. At least three patients were examined at each dose level before advancing to the next level.Results Nineteen male patients (median age, 59.5 years) were enrolled. Eighteen patients had previously untreated stage III or IV SCCHN and 1 had local relapse, rT4. In the 19 patients, the regimen was well tolerated, with neutropenia as the most common toxicity (grade 3; n = 11; grade 4; n = 1). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at the fifth dose level (docetaxel 70mg/m², cisplatin 70mg/m², 5-FU 750mg/m² per day), when 1 patient developed grade 2 renal toxicity during the first course; another 2 patients had persistent neutropenia. These doses were thus deemed the MTD for the regimen. In the 18 assessable patients, the overall clinical response rate was 94% (17/18 patients) and primary-site complete response (CR) occurred in 4 (22%) patients.Conclusion The MTD of this regimen was docetaxel 70mg/m² on day 1, cisplatin 70mg/m² on day 4, and 5-FU 750mg/m² per day for 5 days. The regimen was safe and generally well-tolerated and demonstrated good efficacy in patients with locally advanced SCCHN.     

Phase I study of weekly (day 1 and 8) docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Purpose Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel given every 3 weeks has shown a high degree of activity in a number of tumor types, but at the expense of significant toxicity. To improve the therapeutic index, we evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine, and determined the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities and pharmacokinetics of this combination.Patients and methods Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine, twice daily on days 1–14, of an every-21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were assessed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of chemotherapy.Results Enrolled in the study were 25 patients. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Inability to deliver at least 75% of the planned doses of both drugs during the first two cycles of chemotherapy was noted at dose levels 2, 3 and 4. Dose level 1 (docetaxel 30 mg/m² and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily) is the recommended dose for phase II studies. Five patients experienced a partial response, and eight patients had stabilization of disease. Coadministration of capecitabine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.Conclusion The regimen consisting of docetaxel 30 mg/m² (days 1, 8) and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (days 1–14) was well tolerated. Capecitabine did not alter pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Further testing of this regimen in tumor-specific trials, especially gastric, lung and breast cancer, is warranted.Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 2003, Chicago, IL.     

A phase I-II study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel (one-hour infusion), 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea with granulocyte colony stimulating factor support for patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer.

Background:Concomitant chemoradiotherapy is an effectivetreatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer, but improved regimensare needed. We sought to define the toxicities, recommended phase II dose, andoutcome of a combination chemotherapy regimen with concomitanthyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with poor prognosis cancers of thehead and neck, including those having received prior curative intentradiotherapy. Patients and methods:From 1995 until 1997, 54 patients weretreated, 25 of whom had received a prior full course of radiotherapy to thehead and neck. Patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 600mg/m²/day continuous infusion × 5 days (days 1–5),hydroxyurea, 500 mg p.o. bid × 11 doses (days 1–6) and paclitaxel(60–150 mg/m²) by one-hour infusion on day 2 using a doseescalation strategy. Radiotherapy was given concomitantly on days 2–6,150 cGy bid. Each of 4–5 cycles was delivered every other week. Results:The MTD of paclitaxel was 100 mg/m². Theregimen was feasible; radiotherapy was delivered at a median of 7300 cGy and83% of patients received 80% planned dose intensity.Hematological toxicity, with granulocyte colony stimulating factor, was verymild. Dose limiting toxicities were mucositis and dermatitis. Despite poorprognosis, two-year survival was 45%. Conclusions:The recommended phase II dose of this regimen is 5-FU600 mg/m²/day × 120 hours (days 1–5), hydroxyurea 500mg p.o. b.i.d. × 11 doses (days 1–6), paclitaxel 100mg/m² over one hour on day 2, and radiotherapy 150 cGy b.i.d. days2–6. Concomitant chemotherapy and re-irradiation was feasible on thisprotocol and resulted in long-term survival in patients without other curativeintent options.     

Phase I/II trial of topotecan given as continuous infusion in combination with oxaliplatin in 5-FU-pretreated patients with colorectal cancer

Background Oxaliplatin and topotecan are novel options for a variety of neoplasms. Topotecan has shown fewer side effects and higher efficacy when given as a continuous i.v. infusion compared to single doses, but this regimen has not yet been combined with oxaliplatin.Patients and methods This phase I/II trial was designed to establish the dose-limiting toxicity of a combination of oxaliplatin (85–130 mg/m² on day 1) and a continuous infusion of topotecan (initial 0.9 mg/m² over 72–120 h). Eligible patients with metastatic colorectal cancer had progressive disease during, or within 12 weeks after, palliative fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy or in whom intolerable 5-FU toxicity had developed.Results The study included 21 patients. Subjectively the treatment was well tolerated but haematological toxicity was observed with the initial treatment schedule of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1 and topotecan 0.9 mg/m² on days 1–5. Reducing topotecan to 0.9 mg/m² on days 1–3 resulted also in acceptable haematological toxicity. In patients completing three or more therapy cycles, median progression-free survival was 5 months, and 50% had stable disease or showed a partial response.Conclusion The recommended dose of this combination for further testing is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1 and topotecan 0.9 mg/m² per day as a continuous infusion on days 1–3.Dr. Hubert Szélenyi, born 11 January 1965, died in the prime of life on 29 August 2002. We are deeply saddened by the loss of an excellent physician, accomplished scientist and admirable and warm-hearted friend and colleague. He had essentially designed and developed this study, and we decided to finish it in compliance with his intentions.     

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel with a 4-weekly cisplatin administration in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma

The docetaxel-cisplatin combination is active against several tumors including gastric cancer but it is followed by severe myelosuppression. Recent experience with weekly taxanes has demonstrated a mild myelotoxicity with high dose intensity. We investigated in a phase I study a weekly schedule of docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks in 19 patients with advanced gastric cancer with no prior chemotherapy. Cohorts of patients were treated with escalating doses of docetaxel (starting dose 30 mg/m² per week and increments of 10 mg/m² per week) and cisplatin (starting dose 70 mg/m² and increments of 5 mg/m²). Febrile neutropenia was the only dose-limiting event occurring in four (20%) patients; the dose-limiting toxicity was reached at dose level three (docetaxel 40 mg/m² per week and cisplatin 75 mg/m²). The maximum-tolerated dose was 40 mg/m² per week for docetaxel and 70 mg/m² every 4 weeks for cisplatin. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in six patients (30%); early death occurred in one patient with septic shock because of neutropenia and another with acute coronary ischemia. Two (11%) complete and two (11%) partial responses were documented (ORR 22%; 95% CI 3–39%), with a median response duration of 5 months and median time to progression of 7 months. In conclusion, the combination of weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin is feasible with moderate toxicity and merits further investigation in phase II studies in advanced gastric cancer.Presented as an abstract at the 15th International Congress on Anti-Cancer Treatment, Paris, 9–12 February 2004.     

Experience with combination of docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Sixty patients with locoregionally advanced NPC were enrolled. Patients received IMRT plus three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (60 mg/m²/day on day 1), cisplatin (25 mg/m²/day on days 1–3), and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m²/day on days 1–3).

Results

The overall response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 89 %. Three months after the completion of radiotherapy, 53 (93 %) patients achieved complete regression, 3 (5 %) achieved partial response (PR), and 1 experienced liver metastasis. However, among the 3 PR patients, 2 patients had no evidence of relapse in the follow-up. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 6–43), the 2-year estimated locoregional failure-free survival, distant failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 96.6, 93.3, 89.9, and 98.3 %, respectively. Leukopenia was the main adverse effect in chemotherapy; 14 patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia, and 1 patient developed febrile neutropenia. The nonhematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhea. The incidence of grade 3 acute radiotherapy-related mucositis was 28.3 %; no grade 4 acute mucositis was observed. No grade 3 or grade 4 hematological toxicity occurred during radiotherapy. None of the patients had interrupted radiotherapy. The common late adverse effects included xerostomia and hearing impairment.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant–adjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin, fluorouracil, plus docetaxel combined with IMRT was an effective and well-tolerated alternative for advanced NPC.     

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Background and purpose:Anthracycline-containing regimens arewidely used in advanced breast cancer. However, there is a need for new,non-anthracycline regimens that are active in patients for whom anthracyclinesare contraindicated. The aim of this study was to determine the maximumtolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommendeddoses of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients withmetastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs was alsoevaluated. Patients and methods:Thirty-four women with first-line metastaticbreast cancer were treated with docetaxel, 60–100 mg/m² (day1), and vinorelbine, 20–22.5 mg/m² (days 1 and 5), repeatedevery three weeks and administered on an outpatient basis. Results:Two MTDs were determined: MTD1 was defined at the doselevel using docetaxel 75 mg/m², and vinorelbine 22.5mg/m²; DLT being a grade 3 stomatitis that was more related to thedose of vinorelbine than that of docetaxel. Therefore, the study continuedwith a fixed dose of vinorelbine, 20 mg/m², and docetaxel85–100 mg/m². MTD2 was defined at the dose level combiningdocetaxel, 100 mg/m², and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m²; DLTswere grade 3 stomatitis and severe asthenia. Fluid retention was observed in41% of patients but was never severe or a reason for patientdiscontinuation. In comparison with historical experience, Daflon 500® didnot seem to increase the efficacy of the three-day corticosteroidpremedication by further reducing the incidence or severity of fluidretention. No significant neurotoxicity was observed and no patientdiscontinued the study due to this site effect. Activity was observed at alldose levels and at all metastatic sites, with an overall response rate of71% (95% CI: 52.0%–85.8%). The median timeto progression was 31.4 weeks (95% CI: 12–48 weeks) and mediansurvival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 2.6–26.6 months). Thepharmacokinetics of docetaxel and vinorelbine were not modified between day1 and day 3 when the two drugs were combined with the day 1 administrationschedule used in this study. Conclusion:The recommended doses for phase II studies aredocetaxel, 75 mg/m² (day 1), plus vinorelbine, 20 mg/m²(days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks. At these doses, the combinationwas found to be active and well tolerated.     

S-1 plus cisplatin: another option in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer?

Evaluation of: Fujii M, Tomita K, Nishijima W et al. Phase I/II study of S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced/recurrent head and neck cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 40(3), 214–221 (2010).

A combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin is the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). Japanese investigators replaced 5-FU with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 (40 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 every 4 weeks) to treat patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic HNC; and determined that the dose of cisplatin on day 8 should be 70 mg/m². The authors also studied the efficacy and safety of this regimen in a continuing Phase II trial. Treatment with S-1 plus cisplatin resulted in a confirmed response rate of 44.1% and a median overall survival duration of 16.7 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included anorexia (26.5%), nausea (14.7%), and neutropenia/thrombocytopenia (11.8%). Despite inclusion of patients heterogeneous in disease status and incomplete response evaluation, this study demonstrated that S-1 in combination with cisplatin is feasible for treatment of advanced/recurrent HNC.