Combined Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation for Advanced Hepatic Malignancies: Results in 172 Patients

Background: Resection combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a novel approach in patients who are otherwise unresectable. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection combined with RFA.Methods: Patients with multifocal hepatic malignancies were treated with surgical resection combined with RFA. All patients were followed prospectively to assess complications, treatment response, and recurrence.Results: Seven hundred thirty seven tumors in 172 patients were treated (124 with colorectal metastases; 48 with noncolorectal metastases). RFA was used to treat 350 tumors. Combined modality treatment was well tolerated with low operative times and minimal blood loss. The postoperative complication rate was 19.8% with a mortality rate of 2.3%. At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, tumors had recurred in 98 patients (56.9%). Failure at the RFA site was uncommon (2.3%). A combined total number of tumors treated with resection and RFA >10 was associated with a faster time to recurrence (P = .02). The median actuarial survival time was 45.5 months. Patients with noncolorectal metastases and those with less operative blood loss had an improved survival (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively), whereas radiofrequency ablating a lesion >3 cm adversely impacted survival (HR = 1.85, P = .04).Conclusions: Resection combined with RFA provides a surgical option to a group of patients with liver metastases who traditionally are unresectable, and may increase long-term survival.     

Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency thermal ablation in advanced liver tumors

HYPOTHESIS: Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) can be performed safely and effectively to control local disease in patients with advanced, unresectable liver tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective study of 76 patients with unresectable liver tumors who underwent RFA at a private tertiary referral hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-nine RFA operations were performed to ablate 328 tumors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications and local recurrence. RESULTS: There was 1 death (1%), major complications occurred in 7 operations (7%), and minor complications occurred in 10 operations (10%). Local recurrence was identified in 30 tumors (9%) at a mean follow-up of 15 months. Size (P<.001), vascular invasion (P<.001), and total volume ablated (P<.001) were associated with recurrence but the number of tumors was not (P =.39). CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency thermal ablation provides local control of advanced liver tumors with low recurrence and acceptable morbidity.     

Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Limited data from recent studies suggested an increased risk of bleeding complications, needle-track seeding, and local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: Between May 2001 and October 2002, 80 patients underwent RFA of 104 HCC nodules. Forty-eight patients had subcapsular HCC (group I), whereas the other 32 patients did not have subcapsular HCC (group II). RFA was performed via celiotomy, laparoscopy, or a percutaneous approach. Subcapsular HCCs were ablated by indirect puncture through nontumorous liver, and the needle track was thermocoagulated.Results: There were no significant differences between groups in treatment morbidity (14.6% vs. 15.6%; P = .898), mortality (2.1% vs. 0%; P = 1.000), complete ablation rate after a single session (89.4% vs. 96.9%; P = .392), local recurrence rate (4.3% vs. 12.5%; P = .216), recurrence-free survival (1 year: 60.9% vs. 49.2%; P = .258), or overall survival (1 year: 88.3% vs. 79.4%; P = .441). After a median follow-up of 13 months, no needle-track seeding or intraperitoneal metastasis was observed.Conclusions: This study shows that the results of RFA for subcapsular HCCs are comparable to those of RFA for nonsubcapsular HCCs. Subcapsular HCC should not be considered a contraindication for RFA treatment.     

Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is being used to treat primary and metastatic liver tumors. The indications, treatment planning, and limitations of hepatic RFA must be defined and refined by surgeons treating hepatic malignancies.Methods: A review of the experience using RFA to treat unresectable primary and secondary hepatic malignancies at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, and the G. Pascale National Cancer Institute in Naples, Italy, is provided. Patient selection, treatment approach, local recurrence rates, and overall cancer recurrence rates following RFA are described. The current literature on RFA of hepatic malignancies is reviewed.Results: RFA of hepatic tumors can be performed percutaneously, laparoscopically, or during an open surgical procedure. Incomplete treatment manifest as local recurrence is more common with a percutaneous approach. The morbidity and mortality rates associated with hepatic RFA are low. Local recurrence rates are low if meticulous treatment planning is performed. RFA can be combined safely with partial hepatic resection of large lesions. The long-term survival rates following RFA of primary and metastatic liver tumors have not yet been established.Conclusions: RFA of hepatic malignancies is a safe and promising technique to produce coagulative necrosis of unresectable hepatic malignancies. Experience with this treatment modality is not yet mature enough to establish long-term outcomes.     

Radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively new treatment for unresectable hepatic tumors. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the frequency of complications and local recurrence associated with RFA. METHODS: Patients who underwent RFA of hepatic tumors with curative intent were included in this study. At laparotomy, RFA was performed using intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Computed tomography scans were obtained in the immediate postoperative period and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: Forty patients underwent RFA for 122 hepatic tumors. Thirty-one patients had metastatic lesions from colorectal cancer; 9 had other liver tumors. Complications occurred in 8 patients. With 9.5 months median follow-up, 6 patients had local recurrence of their ablated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience shows that RFA can effectively eradicate unresectable hepatic tumors. The rate and severity of complications appear acceptable. However, further study is necessary to assess long-term recurrence rates and effect on overall survival.     

Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation for hepatic malignancies

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with primary or metastatic malignancies confined to the liver are not candidates for resection because of tumor size, location, multifocality, or inadequate functional hepatic reserve. Cryoablation has become a common treatment in select groups of these patients with unresectable liver tumors. However, hepatic cryoablation is associated with significant morbidity. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a technique that destroys liver tumors in situ by localized application of heat to produce coagulative necrosis. In this study, we compared the complication and early local recurrence rates in patients with unresectable malignant liver tumors treated with either cryoablation or RFA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with hepatic malignancies were entered into two consecutive prospective, nonrandomized trials. The liver tumors were treated intraoperatively with cryoablation or RFA; intraoperative ultrasonography was used to guide placement of cryoprobes or RFA needles. All patients were followed up postoperatively to assess complications, treatment response, and local recurrence of malignant disease. RESULTS: Cryoablation was performed on 88 tumors in 54 patients, and RFA was used to treat 138 tumors in 92 patients. Treatment-related complications, including 1 postoperative death, occurred in 22 of the 54 patients treated with cryoablation (40.7% complication rate). In contrast, there were no treatment-related deaths and only 3 complications after RFA (3.3% complication rate, P<0.001). With a median follow-up of 15 months in both patient groups, tumor has recurred in 3 of 138 lesions treated with RFA (2.2%), versus 12 of 88 tumors treated with cryoablation (13.6%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a safe, well-tolerated treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies. This study indicates that (1) complications occur much less frequently following RFA of liver tumors compared with cryoablation of liver tumors, and (2) early local tumor recurrence is infrequent following RFA.     

Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable liver tumors: factors associated with incomplete ablation or local recurrence

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors is associated with a risk of incomplete ablation or local recurrence.

Methods

One hundred sixty-eight patients with 311 unresectable liver tumors were included. Effects of different variables on incomplete ablation and local recurrence were analyzed.

Results

There were 132 hepatocellular carcinomas and 179 liver metastases. Tumor size was 24 (±13) mm. Two hundred twenty-six tumors were treated percutaneously, and 85 through open approach (associated with liver resection in 42 cases). There was no mortality. Major morbidity rate was 7%. Incomplete ablation and local recurrence rates were 14% and 18.6%. Follow-up was 29 months. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with incomplete ablation were tumor size (>30 mm vs ≤30 mm, P = .004) and approach (percutaneous vs open, P = .0001). Factors associated with local recurrence were tumor size (>30 mm vs ≤30 mm, P = .02) and patient age (>65 years vs ≤65 years, P = .05).

Conclusions

RFA is effective to treat unresectable liver tumors. However, there is a risk of incomplete ablation when percutaneously treating tumors >30 mm. When tumor ablation is completely achieved, the main factor associated with local recurrence is tumor size >30 mm.     

Radiofrequency-ablation of unresectable primary and secondary liver tumors: results in 88 patients

Background and aims Radiofrequency-ablation (RFA) is increasingly used for destruction of unresectable primary and secondary liver tumors. We report our experience in the use of RFA for the management of unresectable hepatic malignancies. Patients and methods Between February 2000 and December 2004 we have undertaken 120 RFA procedures to ablate 426 unresectable primary or metastatic liver tumors in 88 patients. RFA was performed via laparotomy (n=68), laparoscopy (n=9) or a percutaneous approach (n=43). Primary liver cancer was treated in seven patients (8%) and metastatic liver tumors were treated in 81 patients (92%). All patients were followed to assess complications, treatment response and recurrence of malignant disease. Results Procedure-related complication rate was low (3.4%). During a mean follow-up of 21.2 months, 15 patients had local tumor progression (17%), 21 patients (23,9%) had new malignant disease and 27 patients (30.7%) died from intervention-unrelated complications of their malignant disease. Additional liver lesions were identified in 27 (35%) of 77 cases by intraoperative ultrasound. Thirty-six patients received simultaneous resection and RFA. Conclusion RFA is a safe, well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients with unresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies.     

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with transarterial embolization is useful for treatment of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma with surgical risk: Results at 2-year mean follow up

OBJECTIVES: Despite laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryotherapy being performed lately, an even less invasive treatment would be desirable in high-risk patients. Under local anesthesia with i.v. sedation, we were able to perform percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with renal arterial embolization for unresectable stage 1 (T1NoMo) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the feasibility, safety and therapeutic effects of this technique after a 2-year mean follow up. METHODS: Thirty-one patients who were not candidates for surgery underwent RFA for 36 stage 1 RCC. Twenty-eight tumors were percutaneously ablated 6 days after the tumor vessels were embolized. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to evaluate treatment at completion. RESULTS: Tumor enhancement was eliminated after two RFA sessions in all tumors. Thirty tumors remained free of enhancement during a mean follow-up period of 24.3 months. There were no major complications related to the procedures though one instance of pyonephrosis, two of subcapsular hematomas, one of retroperitoneal hemorrhage and one of nausea were seen after RFA. Two patients died of other diseases (i.e. colon cancer and cerebral bleeding) 20 and 26 months after RFA treatment. One patient had a local recurrence of tumor and underwent re-RFA. The recurrence rate of RCC after successful RFA was 2.8%. There was no recurrence in patients who had tumors of less than 4 cm after RFA at a mean follow-up period of 24.3 months. Local control was achieved in 100% of T1NoMo tumors including the recurrence case that underwent re-RFA. CONCLUSIONS: The result of the present study at 2-year mean follow up showed percutaneous RFA was a feasible, safe and promising therapy for the treatment of unresectable stage 1 RCC, especially those smaller than 4 cm.     

Long-term Follow-up Outcome of Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The long-term outcome of radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been reported. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term survival of patients with unresectable HCC after RFA and to identify possible factors that might affect survival. In this prospective study, 65 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent RFA were followed. A total of 84 RFA operations were performed percutaneously (n = 49), laparoscopically (n = 20), or by open surgery (n = 15), to ablate 191 tumors. Twenty-two patients died within 16 months; otherwise, the follow-up period was at least 16 months, up to 71 months, with median 20.0 months and mean (± standard deviation) 24.8 ± 18.4 months for all patients. Local tumor recurrence developed in 12 of 191 tumors (6.3%) in 11 of 84 operations (13.1%), or 11 of 65 patients (16.9%). New liver and/or extrahepatic recurrence developed in 48 operations (57.1%). The overall median, mean, and 5-year survivals were 40.0 months, 33.7 ± 2.9 months, and 39.9%. The disease-free survivals were 16.0 month, 32.9 ± 3.0 months, and 27.9%. Factors that had a significant effect on survival outcome after RFA were TNM cancer stage and the operative approach method employed for RFA. Age, gender, race, etiology, alpha-fetoprotein, previous or subsequent treatment, and liver function (Child-Pugh class) did not affect survival. For patients with unresectable HCC, RFA is an effective and repeatable local treatment that can afford long-term survival, although often with disease recurrence.     

Local, intrahepatic, and systemic recurrence patterns after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic malignancies

The objective of this study was to describe the recurrence patterns in patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As RFA is applied more widely to patients with hepatic tumors, a better understanding of the biologic behavior of these tumors and the risk of recurrence, both in the liver and systemically, is needed. A multidisciplinary team evaluated patients referredh for RFA and followed them prospectively to assess local, intrahepatic, and extrahepatic disease recurrence and complication rates. Forty-five patients with 143 lesions and a minimum follow-up of 6 months (median 19.5 months) were treated. Overall, 7.7% of treated lesions had local recurrence. New intrahepatic disease was seen in 49% of patients, and 24% had evidence of new systemic tumor progression. Patients with colorectal metastatic lesions > 4 cm at the time of the first RFA were more likely to present with local recurrence (P = 0.048). Complications occurred in 27% of patients. Although RFA has a satisfactory local failure rate and safety profile, the patient population being treated is at high risk of developing new disease. Multimodality adjuvant therapy will be necessary to realize the full potential of hepatic malignancy control with RFA. Presented in part at the Third Americas Congress of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Miami, Florida, Feb. 22–25, 2001.     

Neovascularity and clinical outcome in high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas

Background: Increased tumor neovascularity has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in solid tumors. Methods: Microvessels were identified by factor VIII immunohistochemical staining. Analysis of microvessel counts, tumor characteristics, and resection details was performed on 119 primary, high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and correlated with clinical outcome. Results: Tumor characteristics and resection details were analyzed and patient outcome was examined with respect to local recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease-specific survival. Factors found to be significant on univariate analysis for all outcome variables were positive microscopic margin and tumor size. A positive microscopic margin was found to be a significant risk factor for local recurrence (P=.03), distant metastasis (P=.006), and disease-specific survival (P=.004). A primary tumor greater than 10 cm in diameter was a poor prognostic factor for distant metastasis (P=.03) and disease-specific survival (P=.006) when compared to tumors smaller than 10 cm. Microvessel count did not correlate with survival nor did it predict distant metastasis or local recurrence. Histologic subtypes of STS that have a prominent vascular pattern as a diagnostic criterion (i.e., angiosarcoma, liposarcoma, hemangiopericytoma) form a subgroup of all STS. Neovascularity in these subtypes showed no relationship to clinical outcome. Conclusions: These data confirm the prognostic importance of microscopic margin and tumor size in high-grade extremity STS. Neovascularity measured by factor VIII staining had no prognostic significance in these mesenchymal tumors, in contradistinction to carcinomas. Alternatively, microvessel counts may not accurately represent the angiogenic capacity of STS. Therefore, patients with STS who are eligible for anti-angiogenesis clinical trials cannot be identified solely by microvessel count.Presented at the 50th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Chicago, Illinois, March 20–23, 1997.     

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of unresectable hepatic malignancies

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic malignancies has been performed successfully via a percutaneous route or at laparotomy. We analyzed the efficacy and utility of laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound and RFA in patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies. METHODS: Between November 1997 and November 1999, 27 patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies and no evidence of extrahepatic disease were entered in a phase 2 trial of laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound and RFA. Real-time ultrasonography was used to guide RFA, and lesions were ablated at a temperature of 100 degrees C for 10 min. Overlapping ablations were performed for larger lesions. RESULTS: Additional tumors were identified in 10 (37%) of the 27 study patients by laparoscopy and laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound despite extensive preoperative imaging. Radiofrequency ablation of 85 hepatic tumors yielded no mortality and only one case of postoperative bleeding. During a mean follow-up period of 14 months, four tumors (4.7%) locally recurred. Of the 27 patients, 11 (41%) remain free of disease at this writing; (22%) are alive with disease; and 10 (37%) have died with disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RFA and intraoperative ultrasound constitute a safe and accurate method for ablation of unresectable hepatic tumors.     

Local Recurrences After Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases: A Comparative Study with Anatomic and Wedge Resections

Background The indications and results of intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases (LMs) are not well defined in the literature and have never been compared with those of hepatectomy. The aim of the study was to appreciate the local recurrence rate of RFA in comparison with anatomic and wedge resection.Methods Eighty-eight patients with technically unresectable LMs were treated with curative intent. The LMs were treated by anatomic resection (40 patients, 213 LMs) when large, by wedge resection (64 patients, 99 LMs) when peripheral and small, and by RFA (88 patients, 227 LMs) when central and small. The median follow-up was 27.6 months (range, 15–74 months), and a total of 539 LMs were treated (median of 5 per patient).Results The local recurrence rates were 5.7% for the 227 RFAs, 7.1% for the 99 wedge resections, and 12.5% for the 40 anatomic resections (P = .216). Local recurrence rates after RFA were correlated with LMs larger than 30 mm (P < .001) and with LMs in direct contact with large vessels (P < .001).Conclusions RFA is as efficient and safe as wedge or anatomic resections in terms of local control.     

Percutaneous thermal ablation of primary and secondary lung tumors: Comparison between microwave and radiofrequency ablation

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare microwave (MWA) and radiofrequency (RFA) ablation in the percutaneous treatment of primary and secondary lung tumors.Material and methodsA total of 115 patients with a total of 160 lung tumors (primary, n = 41; secondary, n = 119) were retrospectively included. There were 56 men and 59 women with a mean age of 67.8 ± 12.7 (SD) years (range: 42–89 years) who underwent either MWA (61 patients; 79 tumors) or RFA (54 patients; 81 tumors). The primary study endpoints were local recurrence during follow-up and the incidence of complications during and following thermal ablation. The MWA and RFA groups were compared in terms of treatment efficacy and complication rates.ResultsDemographics were similar in the two groups. Mean tumor diameter was smaller in RFA group (13.1 ± 5.1 [SD] mm; range: 4–27 mm) than in MWA group (17.1 ± 8.3 [SD] mm; range: 5–36 mm) (P < 0.001). Ablation volumes at one month were 24.1 ± 21.7 (SD) cm³ (range: 2–97.8 cm³) in RFA group and 30.2 ± 35.9 (SD) cm³ (range: 1.9–243.8 cm³) in MWA group (P = 0.195). During a mean overall follow-up duration of 488 ± 407 (SD) days (range: 30–1508 days), 9/160 tumors (5.6%) developed local recurrence: six (6/79; 7.6%) in the RFA group and three (3/81; 3.7%) in the MWA group (P = 0.32). Pneumothoraces were more frequent in the RFA group (32/79; 40.5%) than in the MWA group (20/81; 24.7%) (P = 0.049). The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 ± 3.7 (SD) days (range: 1–25 days) in the RFA group and 4.7 ± 4.6 (SD) days (range: 2–25 days) in the MWA group (P = 0.76).ConclusionsMWA favorably compares with RFA and can be considered as an effective and safe thermal ablation technique for lung tumors, especially in situations where RFA has limited efficacy.     

Long-term survival after radiofrequency ablation of complex unresectable liver tumors

HYPOTHESIS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may improve survival of high-risk patients with unresectable and refractory tumors. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. SETTING: A tertiary referral cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1, 1997, and January 31, 2005, we performed 219 RFA procedures to ablate 521 hepatic tumors in 181 patients. RESULTS: Of the 181 patients, 52% were male and 48% were female, and the mean age was 61.3 years (age range, 27-91 years). Radiofrequency ablation was performed via celiotomy (n = 135), via laparoscopy (n = 48), or percutaneously (n = 36). In 106 patients (79%), RFA was used in combination with surgical resection. The most common tumors included colorectal cancer (40.9%), hepatocellular carcinoma (14.9%), carcinoid tumor (13.8%), melanoma (9.4%), and breast cancer (5.0%). The average number of tumors per patient was 3.3 tumors. The average number of RFA-treated lesions per procedure was 2.38 lesions; the mean lesion size was 3.56 cm (lesion size range, 0.8-9.0 cm). At a mean follow-up of 33.2 months (follow-up range, 12-91 months), overall survival was 48.3 months for carcinoid tumors, 25.2 months for hepatocellular carcinoma, 18.5 months for melanoma, 29.7 months for colorectal cancer, and 30.1 months for breast cancer. Seventy-eight patients (43%) developed recurrences. Of 521 tumors that were treated, 125 (24%) recurred; the incidence of local recurrence was 28% for tumors larger than 3 cm vs 18% for tumors 3 cm or smaller (P = .04). Twenty-nine patients underwent serial ablations. Seventy-one patients (39%) were disease free at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients whose hepatic malignancies are unresectable or refractory to chemotherapy may be considered for RFA as part of a multimodality therapeutic regimen. In these patients, RFA is safe and may prolong survival.     

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility of lung radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with unresectable pulmonary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 39 patients with unresectable metastases from RCC who were treated with lung RFA. Patients with six or fewer lung metastases measuring ≤6 cm that were confined in the lung, had all lung tumours ablated (curative ablation). Patients with extrapulmonary lesions, seven or more lung tumours, or large tumours of >6 cm, had mass reduction (palliative ablation). The primary endpoints was the overall survival, secondary endpoints were safety, local tumour progression rate, and recurrence‐free survival in the curative ablation group.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the overall survival rates between the curative and palliative groups at 1 year (100% vs 90%), 3 years (100% vs 52%) and 5 years (100% vs 52%) (P < 0.05). The maximum lung tumour diameter was also a significant prognostic factor. There was local tumour progression in 13 patients (33%) during the mean follow‐up of 25 months. The recurrence‐free survival rates were 92% at 1 year, 23% at 3 years and 23% at 5 years in the curative ablation group. Pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement (six of 89, 7%) and pneumonia (one of 89, 1%) were major complications.

CONCLUSION

Lung RFA is a safe and effective treatment for prolonging survival in patients with unresectable RCC lung metastases.     

Thermal ablation for small renal masses: Identifying the most appropriate tumor size cut-off for predicting perioperative and oncological outcomes

ObjectivesTo test TRIFECTA achievement [1) absence of CLAVIEN-DINDO ≥3 complications; 2) complete ablation; 3) absence of ≥30% decrease in eGFR] and local recurrence rates, according to tumor size, in patients treated with thermal ablation (TA: radiofrequency [RFA] and microwave ablation [MWA]) for small renal masses.MethodsRetrospective analysis (2008–2020) of 432 patients treated with TA (RFA: 162 vs. MWA: 270). Tumor size was evaluated as: 1) continuously coded variable (cm); 2) tumor size strata (0.1–2 vs. 2.1–3 vs. 3.1-4 vs. >4 cm). Multivariable logistic regression models and a minimum P-value approach were used for testing TRIFECTA achievement. Kaplan-Meier plots depicted local recurrence rates over time.ResultsOverall, 162 (37.5%) vs. 140 (32.4%) vs. 82 (19.0%) vs. 48 (11.1%) patients harboured, respectively, 0.1 to 2 vs. 2.1 to 3 vs. 3.1 to 4 vs. >4 cm tumors. In multivariable logistic regression models, increasing tumor size was associated with higher rates of no TRIFECTA achievement (OR:1.11; P< 0.001). Using a minimum P-value approach, an optimal tumor size cut-off of 3.2 cm was identified (P< 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models, 3.1 to 4 cm tumors (OR:1.27; P< 0.001) and >4 cm tumors (OR:1.49; P< 0.001), but not 2.1 to 3 cm tumors (OR:1.05; P= 0.3) were associated with higher rates of no TRIFECTA achievement, relative to 0.1 to 2 cm tumors. The same results were observed in separate analyses of RFA vs. MWA patients. After a median (IQR) follow-up time of 22 (12–44) months, 8 (4.9%), 8 (5.7%), 11 (13.4%), and 5 (10.4%) local recurrences were observed in tumors sized 0.1 to 2 vs. 2.1 to 3 vs. 3.1 to 4 vs. >4 cm, respectively (P= 0.01).ConclusionA tumor size cut-off value of ≤3 cm is associated with higher rates of TRIFECTA achievement and lower rates of local recurrence over time in patients treated with TA for small renal masses.     

Impact of an ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation training program on the outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PurposeThe aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of a training program on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and methodsA total of 227 patients with 296 HCC nodules who underwent percutaneous RFA with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization at our institution were included. There were 163 men and 64 women with a mean age of 74.2 ± 8.3 (SD) years (range: 41–89 years). Percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA was performed by three trainees (205 HCC nodules in 157 patients) or a mentor (91 HCC nodules in 70 patients) after preprocedural preparation including planning ultrasonography. We compared background-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors, and local recurrence and complication rates between the trainee group and the mentor group. Similarly, we compared these variables among the years 2015, 2016, and 2017 for trainee group.ResultsThe proportion of easy-to-treat tumors in the trainee group (109/205; 53.2%) was greater than that in the mentor group (33/91; 36.3%) (P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed in procedure difficulty among the years 2015, 2016, and 2017 for trainee group (easy-to-treat HCC nodules: 25/47; 53.2% vs. 39/79; 49.4% vs. 45/79; 57.0%. P = 0.775). The local recurrence rate in the trainee group was 8.8% (18/205 HCC nodules) which was equivalent to 7.7% in the mentor group (7/91 HCC nodules). No significant differences were observed in local recurrence rate (8.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively; P = 0.621) and major complication rate (1.3% vs. 1.4%, respectively; P = 0.999) between the trainee group and the mentor group. No significant differences were observed in local recurrence rates ([5/47; 10.6%] vs. [11/79; 13.9%] vs. [2/79; 2.5%]) (P = 0.109) and major complication rates ([1/36; 2.8%] vs. [1/62; 1.6%] vs. [0/59; 0%]) (P = 0.701) between the years 2015, 2016, and 2017 for trainee group.ConclusionA well supervised training program that includes planning ultrasonography fosters the efficacy and treatment quality of RFA for HCC.     

Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: Indications, limitations, and complications

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly used for the local destruction of unresectable hepatic malignancies. There is little information on its optimal approach or potential complications. Methods: Since late 1997, we have undertaken 91 RFA procedures to ablate 231 unresectable primary or metastatic liver tumors in 84 patients. RFA was performed via celiotomy (n=39), laparoscopy (n=27), or a percutaneous approach (n=25). Patients were followed with spiral computed tomographic (CT) scans at 1 to 2 weeks postprocedure and then every 3 months for 2 years. Results: Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) detected intrahepatic disease not evident on the preoperative scans of 25 of 66 patients (38%) undergoing RFA via celiotomy or laparoscopy. In 38 of 84 patients (45%), RFA was combined with resection or cryosurgical ablation (CSA), or both. RFA was used to treat an average of 2.8 lesions per patient, and the median size of treated lesions was 2 cm (range, 0.3–9 cm). The average hospital stay was 3.6 days overall (1.8 days for percutaneous and laparoscopic cases). Ten patients underwent a second RFA procedure (sequential ablations) and, in one case, a third RFA procedure for large (one patient), progressive (seven patients), and/or recurrent (three patients) lesions. Seven (8%) patients had complications: one skin burn; one postoperative hemorrhage; two simple hepatic abscesses; one hepatic abscess associated with diaphragmatic heat necrosis following sequential percutaneous ablations of a large lesion; one postoperative myocardial infarction; and one liver failure. There were three deaths, one (1%) of which was directly related to the RFA procedure. Three of the complications, including one RFA-related death, occurred after percutaneous RFA. At a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 1–27 months), 15 patients (18%) had recurrences at an RFA site, and 36 patients (43%) remained clinically free of disease. Conclusions: Celiotomy or laparoscopic approaches are preferred for RFA because they allow IOUS, which may demonstrate occult hepatic disease. Operative RFA also allows concomitant resection, CSA, or placement of a hepatic artery infusion pump, and isolation of the liver from adjacent organs. Percutaneous RFA should be reserved for patients at high risk for anesthesia, those with recurrent or progressive lesions, and those with smaller lesions sufficiently isolated from adjacent organs. Complications may be minimized when these approaches are applied selectively. Presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 16–19, 2000, New Orleans, Louisiana.