Positive fraction of systematic biopsies predicts risk of relapse after radical prostatectomy

Objectives. To determine whether the positive fraction of systematic sextant biopsies contributes to the prediction of serologic relapse after radical prostatectomy.Methods. A retrospective review of patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsy and radical prostatectomy was performed. No patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. The relationship between the positive fraction of systematic biopsies and risk of prostate-specific antigen recurrence was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses.Results. Patients with three or fewer positive sextant biopsies were at a significantly lower risk of relapse after radical prostatectomy than patients with four or more positive biopsies. Tumor grade and systematic biopsy results were the most powerful predictors of serologic relapse.Conclusions. The positive fraction of systematic biopsies contributes to the prediction of risk of relapse after radical prostatectomy.     

Prediction of focal extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy: Relative merit of transrectal ultrasound, endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density, and systematic biopsy

We conducted a study to compare the relative merits of prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and systematic biopsy in the prediction of focal extracapsular extension (ECE) at radical prostatectomy. A retrospective review of patients who underwent TRUS, endorectal MRI, and radical prostatectomy at our institution was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who were thought to be surgical candidates by digital rectal examination and TRUS underwent endorectal MRI prior to radical prostatectomy. Imaging, PSA, PSAD, and systematic biopsy results (tumor grade and fraction of positive systematic biopsies) were correlated with step-sectioned, radical prostatectomy pathologic data. Data was analyzed for the entire prostate and on each individual side. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios were calculated for each modality, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to weigh the relative contributions of preoperative parameters in predicting ECE.

Data was collected from 54 patients who had sextant systematic biopsy, imaging, and radical prostatectomy. A total of 24 sides demonstrated ECE (19 patients, 5 with bilateral ECE). When assessed for the dominant prostate side and on a side-for-side basis, MRI had the highest sensitivity and NPV for detecting focal ECE. MRI also had the highest PPV, and TRUS had the highest specificity for side-for-side analysis. For the dominant prostate side, PSA had the highest specificity and PPV for detecting focal ECE. Of note, significant overlap was demonstrated in the 95% confidence intervals of all modalities with each other for all analyses. ROC analyses found MRI and Gleason sum to be superior for the dominant prostate side assessment and MRI and the fraction of positive systematic biopsies to be superior for a side-for-side analysis. Optimal likelihood ratios for positive test results were seen for PSA (dominant prostate side) and MRI (side-for-side), and for negative test results for MRI. Logistic regression demonstrated MRI and Gleason sum to be powerful predictors of ECE. Thus, we would conclude that endorectal MRI and tumor grade provide unique information in the prediction of focal ECE in select patients.     

Comparison of ultrasound-guided biopsies and prostatectomy specimens: predictive accuracy of Gleason score and tumor site

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the accuracy of sextant biopsies in predicting Gleason score and the site of tumor location in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radical perineal prostatectomy. METHODS: The case records of 289 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy were reviewed, comparing the Gleason score and tumor site location as determined by sextant ultrasound-guided core biopsies with the Gleason score and tumor distribution within the surgical specimens. The prostatectomy specimens were further characterized by extent of disease as organ-confined, specimen-confined or margin-positive. RESULTS: The Gleason score was identical in 126 (43.5%) patients. An upgrading in the surgical specimen occurred in 118 (40.8%) cases, a downgrading in 43 (14.8%). Overall, 193 (66.7%) patients had a unilateral positive biopsy, while 96 (33.2%) patients had bilateral positive biopsies. Sixty-four (33.1%) patients with a unilateral positive biopsy had cancer confined to one side of the gland, while 127 (65.8%) showed bilateral disease; 142 (73.5%) patients had organ-confined tumors versus 51 (26.4%) patients with capsular penetration. In the 96 patients with bilateral positive biopsies, 64 (66.6%) patients had intracapsular cancer versus 32 (33.3%) patients with either specimen-confined or margin-positive disease. The overall rate of positive margins was 14%. Fifty-one (61.4%) of the 83 patients with non-organ-confined disease had posterolateral capsular penetration in the region of the superior pedicle of the neurovascular bundle, while 28 (33.7%) patients had apical capsular penetration, in the region of the inferior neurovascular pedicle. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of sextant ultrasound-guided biopsies to estimate the pathological grading is satisfactory: when we consider a difference of +/- 1 in the final Gleason score, the overall correlation is 80%. In 66% of the cases, sextant biopsies predicted unilateral disease when bilateral disease existed. A unilateral positive biopsy does not predict unilateral disease.     

Does site-specific labelling and individual processing of sextant biopsies improve the accuracy of prostate biopsy in predicting pathological stage in patients with T1c prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether individual labelling and processing of the sextant of origin improves the accuracy of prostate biopsy in predicting the final pathological stage after radical prostatectomy in patients with T1c prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 386 patients treated for prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy between January 1996 and June 1999 were reviewed. In all, 124 patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: no abnormality on digital rectal examination (DRE) or transrectal ultrasonography, a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level before biopsy of < or = 20 ng/mL, and prostate cancer diagnosed after one set of random sextant biopsies, with the cores being submitted in six separate containers individually labelled for the sextant of origin. RESULTS: Within this series of patients with a low tumour burden, the preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score and unilateral vs bilateral involvement were not significant predictors of disease extension. The percentage of positive cores and the number and topography of positive sextants were both statistically significant predictors of organ-confined disease. Although these two variables appeared to be statistically equivalent on a first analysis in the overall series, a subgroup of patients was identified who benefited from the complete topographical information, i.e. those 52 (42%) patients with a Gleason score of < 7, 25-75% positive biopsies and < or =3 positive sextants. CONCLUSION: These results support the individual labelling of biopsy cores in selected patients with a normal DRE and a moderately elevated PSA, as it helps to better predict the final pathological stage. This substantial benefit outweighs the additional effort by the pathologist.     

Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension,seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy

Introduction: Initial diagnostic evaluation may provide information about the extent of disease after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, local disease extension identified by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), total number of positive biopsies and percentage of positive cores for cancer, as well as TRUS Biopsy Gleason score in determining the extent of disease in radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 171 patients who underwent RRP from March 1993 to February 2003 for organ confined prostate cancer and whose follow-up data was accessible. The correlation of preoperative serum PSA level, local disease extension in TRUS, the total number of positive sextant biopsies and the percent of cores positive for cancer and Gleason score at TRUS biopsy specimen with the extent of disease at final pathology (Extra-capsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), lymph node involvement (LNI) and surgical margin (SM) status on RRP specimens) were analyzed. Results: The median age of the patients was 65 years. The mean preoperative serum PSA level of all patients was 11.6 ± 1.2 (median 8.6) ng/ml. Histopathological evaluation of RRP specimens revealed 60 (35%) patients with ECE, 38 (22.2%) with SVI, 7 (0.04%) with LNI, and 58 (33.9%) had positive SM. Comparing the preoperative TRUS findings and postoperative evaluation of RRP specimens, the sensitivity of TRUS in predicting the ECE was 11.8% and specificity was 96%. Sensitivity of TRUS in predicting SVI was 9.8% and its specificity was 99%. With univariate analysis (sample t-test), Gleason score, percent of cores positive for cancer, and DRE were found to be predictive factors for extra-prostatic disease in RRP specimens. But with multivariate analysis (logistic regression test) Gleason score appears to be the most important and independent predictive factor for extra-prostatic disease in RRP specimens. Serum PSA levels and percentages of cores positive for cancer were also significant predictors of non organ-confined disease found at final pathology. Conclusion: Gleason score is the most important and independent predictive factor for extra-prostatic disease. Serum PSA levels and percentages of cores positive for cancer are the other important but non-independent predictive factors.     

Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens

PURPOSE: To determine the importance of increasing the number of biopsy cores to decrease the discrepancy of Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1998 and July 2005, 392 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by 18-gauge transrectal needle biopsy underwent radical prostatectomy. We categorized the cohort into 2 groups according to the number of the cores. Group 1 consisted of 206 patients diagnosed by extended biopsies (> or =10 cores, range 10-14, median 11). The remaining 186 patients who were diagnosed by sextant biopsies were categorized as being in group 2. Preoperative clinical variables, including patient age, digital rectal examination findings, serum prostate-specific antigen, and the number of cores positive for cancer the parameters, were assessed in both groups. The concordance of Gleason scores in both groups were analyzed by both individual Gleason scores and clinical subgroups of Gleason scores: 2-4 (well differentiated), 5-6 (moderately differentiated), 7 (intermediate), and 8-10 (poorly differentiated). RESULTS: Needle biopsies revealed moderately differentiated tumors (Gleason 5-6) for the 2 groups (55.3% and 60.2%). Gleason scores of the needle biopsies were identical to that of the prostatectomy specimen in 116 (56.31%) and 76 cases (40.86%) for each group (kappa: 0.432 and 0.216 for each group, respectively). Gleason score of the needle biopsy differed by 1 grade in 56 (27.18%) and 84 cases (45.16%), and by > or =2 units in 34 (16.50%) and 26 cases (15.05%) for each group, respectively. Of the specimens, 34% were undergraded, and 10% were overgraded in group 1. These rates were 38% and 22% in group 2, respectively. A total of 70% in group 1 and 56% in group 2 remained in the same categorical group, 28% and 32% of the specimens were undergraded, and 4% and 12% were overgraded in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1, the number of patients with Gleason scores of 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8 were 9.7%, 55.3%, 21.4%, 13.6%, and 1.9%, 47.6%, 32%, 18.4%, graded by needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens, respectively. However, in the sextant group, the change was the number of patients with Gleason scores of 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 was 5.4% 60.2%, 24.7%, and 9.7%, detected by needle biopsies, respectively. Radical prostatectomy specimens revealed the same Gleason categories in 4.3%, 41.9%, 38.7%, and 15.1%, respectively. There was no correlation between categorized prostate-specific antigen levels and concordance of the Gleason grade. Age and digital rectal examination results did not affect Gleason correlation. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that an extended biopsy scheme beyond its superior diagnostic capability also improves the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.     

A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer should be restricted to patients who harbor tumors without capsular penetration. To our knowledge the selection criteria for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy are not clearly defined. We investigated a panel of preoperative tumor characteristics with respect to their ability to predict organ confined tumor growth for each lobe of the prostate to indicate unilateral or bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine preoperative tumor characteristics in 278 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were included in retrospective univariate and multivariate tree structured regression analysis. The association of clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and results of transrectal ultrasound and systematic sextant biopsy, including a quantitative assessment of cancer in the biopsies with organ confined tumor growth, was statistically evaluated. Except for serum PSA and PSA density preoperative characteristics were considered separately for each prostate lobe. Multivariate analysis results were validated prospectively in 353 patients. RESULTS: On univariate analysis the number of positive biopsies was the most useful single parameter with a positive predictive value of 83% in 274 lobes and a negative predictive value of 55%, followed by mm. of tumor in the biopsy. Of all characteristics included in multivariate analysis only the number of biopsies with high grade cancer, the number of positive biopsies and serum PSA were independent for predicting organ confined cancer. When PSA was less than 10 ng./ml. and not more than 1 biopsy with high grade cancer was identified in a lobe, organ confined tumor growth was present in 86.1% of cases. On prospective validation the same criteria led to an 88.5% incidence of organ confined prostate cancer. Pooling the 2 most favorable groups led to 391 prostate lobes (70.8% of those investigated) with a positive predictive value of 82.1% (95% confidence interval 77.9% to 85.8%). Using the multivariate approach more prostate lobes were assigned to a favorable risk group than on univariate analysis. Clinical stage and simple Gleason grade did not contribute independent information for predicting organ confined disease. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying cancer and high grade cancer by systematic biopsy and serum PSA concentration are useful preoperative characteristics for predicting organ confined prostate cancer. Side specific analysis of these parameters is a flexible and reliable tool for selecting patients for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.     

Value of ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies in prostate tumor mapping

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of positive sextant biopsies in assessing the location of prostate tumors within radical prostatectomy specimens and to determine if prostate weight influences the results. METHODS: From 1988 to 1996, 166 radical prostatectomies were performed for localized prostate cancer diagnosed by means of ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies. The location of the biopsies was compared with that of tumor tissue within the radical prostatectomy specimen. RESULTS: Of the 996 biopsies, 331 (33%) were positive. The correspondence between the location of the biopsies and that of tumor tissue in the surgical specimen was found to have a sensitivity of 39.4%, a specificity of 81.5%, a positive predictive value of 83.3%, negative predictive value of 36.4% and an accuracy of 52%. For prostates weighing < and >/= 45 g, the sensitivity was 39.9 and 38.9%, the specificity was 88 and 77.2%, the positive predictive value was 90.8 and 76.1%, the negative predictive value was 34.9 and 39.8%, and the accuracy was 52 and 52%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Negative biopsies do not predict a lack of tumor tissue in the corresponding prostate site after radical prostatectomy, and had less value than positive biopsies for prognostic staging before radical prostatectomy. Results of sextant biopsies are more significant for prognosis before radical prostatectomy when positive. Prostate weight influences the interpretation of the results of sextant biopsies.     

The value of multiple core biopsies for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of Gleason grading of prostate cancer in multiple core biopsies, compared with the final Gleason score of total prostatectomy specimens, and to investigate whether the prediction of the correct Gleason score is improved by increasing the number of biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Before total prostatectomy, 121 men had a mean (range) of 10.0 (8-14) transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided core biopsies taken from the apex, mid-medial, mid-lateral and basal regions, from the transition zone and from lesions detected on TRUS. The biopsies and prostatectomy specimens were reviewed and the Gleason scores assessed. RESULTS: The preoperative biopsies predicted the prostatectomy Gleason score exactly in 45.5% of the patients and within one Gleason score in 93.4%. The biopsies under-graded the prostate cancer in 38.8% and overgraded it in 15.7%. The weighted kappa value for exact agreement was 0.502. If one biopsy was positive for cancer, the prostatectomy Gleason score was predicted correctly in 43.8% and within one score in 93.8%, compared with 53.8% and 92.3%, respectively, if cancer was found in at least seven biopsies. If the mid-lateral and transition zone biopsies had been excluded from the biopsy protocol, 5% of the cancers would have been undetected. Among the remaining 115 cancers, grading accuracy only improved from 43.5% to 45.2% by adding biopsies to the sextant protocol. CONCLUSION: Despite a statistically significant agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason score, under-grading remains a major problem. The prediction of the prostatectomy Gleason score is only marginally improved by increasing the number of biopsies.     

Differences in biopsy features between prostate cancers located in the transition and peripheral zone

OBJECTIVE: To identify the zonal location of prostate cancers before surgery, by analysing the mapping of ultrasonography-guided systematic sextant biopsies for differences between cancers located in the transition zone (TZ) and peripheral zone (PZ); and to compare the correlation between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and those of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 186 patients with TZ (46) and PZ cancers (140) underwent ultrasonography-guided systematic sextant biopsy and RP at the same institution. The clinical and pathological characteristics, and the anatomical location of positive biopsies, were determined and compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Differences between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and those of RP specimens were evaluated and compared by Cohen kappa testing. RESULTS: TZ cancers had a significantly lower rate of positive biopsies in the middle (63% vs 80%) and base (50% vs 80%) of the prostate than had PZ cancers. Positive biopsies were exclusively obtained from the apex in 19.6% of TZ and 5% of PZ cancers (P = 0.002). There was exact agreement between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and those of RP specimens in 15.2% of TZ (kappa = 0.02) and 55% of PZ cancers (kappa = 0.25), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with PZ cancers, TZ cancers had a different anatomical pattern of positive biopsies, with lower rates in the middle and base of the prostate. The finding of positive biopsies exclusively in the apex favoured prostate cancer located in the TZ. Furthermore, the correlation between needle biopsy Gleason scores and those of the RP specimens was clearly lower in TZ cancers.     

Sextant prostate biopsies predict side and sextant site of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We examined the ability of sextant prostate biopsies in combination with other preoperative data to predict side and sextant site of prostate cancer extracapsular extension in a large cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 223 contemporary cases of prostate cancer managed by radical prostatectomy. Using logistic regression analysis, we determined whether patient age, Gleason score, clinical stage, prostate specific antigen, number of positive sextants, biopsy location or percent of biopsy cores positive for cancer in a sextant site, side and overall gland was predictive of location of pathological extracapsular extension into periprostatic tissue. RESULTS: Of 41 of the 223 (18%) patients with nonorgan confined disease extracapsular extension was localized to 45 sextant sites in 36 (apex 8, mid 22, base 15) while only side of extension was known in 5. In a multivariate analysis the best predictors of the risk of extracapsular extension on a side were average percent biopsy cores positive for cancer overall 15 or greater (odds ratio 8.4, p <0.0001) and average from 3 ipsilateral biopsies 15 or greater (odds ratio 7.4, p <0.0001). When used in combination these 2 factors yielded a model with a positive predictive value of 37% and a negative predictive value of 95%. Sextant specific percent biopsy cores positive for cancer was predictive of risk of extracapsular extension in a sextant (odds ratio 2.5, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that average overall and per side percent biopsy cores positive for cancer is a significant predictor of risk of extracapsular extension on a side. Sextant specific percent biopsy cores positive for cancer is predictive of sextant site of extension. The high negative predictive value of the side specific model identifies patients who are good candidates for nerve sparing surgery.     

穿刺标本Gleason评分预测前列腺癌病理分级准确性的研究

目的 分析前列腺癌患者穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分的相关性,探讨影响穿刺标本Gleason评分准确性的可能因素.方法 回顾性分析86例接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者资料,比较穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分的符合情况,应用二分类Logistic回归分析筛选影响穿刺标本Gleason评分准确性的可能因素.结果 86例患者穿刺标本平均Gleason评分为6.1,根治术标本平均Gleason评分为6.5,穿刺标本与根治术标本Gleason评分相比,评分相符42例(48.8%),评分偏低32例(37.2%),评分偏高1 2例(14.0%),差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05),偏差与患者年龄、血清PSA、前列腺体积、临床分期无显著相关性(P＞0.05),与穿刺针数(OR=2.905)及穿刺阳性率(OR=4.225)有显著相关(P＜0.05).结论 穿刺针数与穿刺阳性针数百分比是影响穿刺标本Gleason评分准确性的可能因素,增加前列腺穿刺活检针数将可能有助于提高穿刺标本预测前列腺癌病理分级的准确性.     

Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy

OBJECTIVES: To explore an optimal combination of sampling sites to detect prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic three-dimensional 26-core biopsy (3D26PBx), a combination of transrectal 12 and transperineal 14 core biopsies, was performed in 235 Japanese men with prior negative biopsy. Using recursive partitioning, we evaluated cancer detection of all possible combinations of sampling sites and selected the combination that provides the highest cancer detection rate at a given number of biopsy cores. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 87 of the 235 (37%) men. The 3D26PBx improved cancer detection by 89% relative to the conventional transrectal sextant biopsy. Neither Gleason score nor percentage of Gleason 4/5 cancers differed between cancers with and without positive cores within the transrectal sextant-sampling sites. A three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal approaches outperformed either transrectal or transperineal approach alone. Recursive partitioning revealed that a three-dimensional 16-core (transrectal eight cores plus transperineal eight cores) biopsy could detect all the cancers with the minimum number of cores. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a three-dimensional combination of transrectal eight cores taken from the far lateral peripheral zone and the parasagittal base, and transperineal eight cores taken from the anterior and posterior apex and the transition zone as an optimal set of sampling sites for repeat biopsy.     

Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate taking more biopsy cores for predicting the radical prostatectomy (RP) Gleason score compared with the biopsy Gleason score, as although random sextant biopsies are the standard for a tissue diagnosis of prostate cancer, and taking more biopsies increases the detection rate, it is uncertain whether taking more cores improves the prediction of the RP Gleason score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed retrospectively 404 patients from three centres (Seattle 162, Washington 107 and Chicago 135) who had RP for prostate cancer. Six, eight or 10 biopsies were taken based on the physician's preference and the patient's characteristics. RESULTS: Before RP, 158 (39%) patients had six, 65 (16%) had eight and 181 (45%) had 10 biopsy cores taken. The accuracy of the Gleason sum of the three groups was 65/158 (41%), 26/65 (40%) and 104/181 (57.5%), respectively (P < 0.004, 10-core vs six-core). However, when comparing the Gleason score separately (i.e. 4 + 3 is not equal to 3 + 4), the accuracy of the three groups was 48/158 (30%), 20/65 (31%), and 95/181 (52.5%), respectively (P < 0.001, 10-core vs six core). CONCLUSIONS: Taking more biopsy cores improves the accuracy of the biopsy Gleason score in predicting the final Gleason score at RP; the predictive accuracy of the final Gleason score may be increased from 41% to 58% by increasing the number of biopsies from six to 10.     

Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the percentage of cancer in prostate needle biopsies provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and/or biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: One hundred and forty prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Preoperative parameters analyzed were patient age, PSA, clinical stage, and the information obtained from sextant biopsies (Gleason score, maximum percentage of cancer in a core, percentage of tissue with cancer in all biopsies and the number of cores positive for cancer). Univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) for the dependent variables (prostate cancer, organ-confined and biochemical relapse) were performed. RESULTS: The tumor was organ-confined in 73.6% of patients. In those patients studied for disease progression (n = 126), no biochemical recurrence was observed in 76.2%. In the multivariate analysis for organ-confined disease, the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level, the Gleason score and the clinical stage were the most accurate predictive factors of pathological stage. The multivariate analysis for the study of biochemical failure indicated that only the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level and the Gleason score were independent predictive factors. According to the logistic regression analysis for disease recurrence, 3 risk groups could be identified: low risk (less than 10% probability of disease progression), intermediate risk (30%) and high risk (more than 70%). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of cancer in prostate biopsy provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.     

The effect of sampling more cores on the predictive accuracy of pathological grade and tumour distribution in the prostate biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To determine if increasing the number of cores at biopsy improves the predictive accuracy of the Gleason score or aids in anticipating the location and volume of prostate tumour. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 75 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinical T1-2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were reviewed retrospectively; 31 patients had a sextant biopsy (group 1) and 44 had > or = 8 cores taken (group 2). The concordance between biopsy data and final prostatectomy Gleason score, tumour location and volume was determined for each group. RESULTS: There were no differences in mean age, prostate-specific antigen level before biopsy or biopsy Gleason score for the two groups; 58% of group 1 had their final pathological grade changed after prostatectomy, vs 29% of group 2 (P < 0.05). In neither group was there a significant correlation between the percentage of cores positive for tumour and the percentage volume of prostate involved with cancer, or the ability of the biopsy to predict tumour location. CONCLUSION: Taking > or = 8 biopsy cores improved the pathological grading accuracy, which may be valuable in choosing a treatment for the patient with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.     

Comparison of Gleason scores from sextant prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the Gleason scores obtained from sextant prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients having a clinical diagnosis of localized prostate cancer underwent needle biopsy under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and RP. Grading and staging were assigned based on Gleason scores and the TNM system, respectively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.5 +/- 13.43 years and mean PSA level was 14.69 +/- 3.95. Mean Gleason score for prostate biopsy and RP specimen were 5.85 +/- 0.7 and 6.34 +/- 1.44, respectively. With respect to clinical stage, there were 20 patients in stage 1 and 41 patients in stage 2 prostate cancer. Comparing the Gleason scores, the biopsy score was lower in 26 (42.26%) and higher than RP specimens in 7 (11.84%) cases, and there was agreement between the biopsy and RP specimens in 28 (45.9%) patients. The difference between the two Gleason scores was +/- 1 for 18 patients (29.5%) and +/- 2 or more for 17 patients (27.86%). CONCLUSION: In our study, high Gleason score biopsies with elevated PSA level (>10 ng/ml) were risk factors for extraprostatic extension, and we demonstrated that Gleason scores were significantly correlated with seminal vesicle and lymph node invasion (p < 0.05). The Gleason scores of biopsy and RP specimens agreed with 45.9% of TRUS-guided sextant prostate biopsies, and this ratio was 91.1% in moderately differentiated tumors Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Six additional systematic lateral cores enhance sextant biopsy prediction of pathological features at radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We evaluated the contribution of 6 additional systematically obtained, laterally directed biopsy cores to traditional sextant biopsy for the prediction of final pathological findings in the radical prostatectomy specimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 178 consecutive patients with no history of prostate biopsy in whom prostate cancer was diagnosed during an initial systematic 12 core biopsy and who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Of the systematic 12 cores we compared the subset of the 6 traditional sextant cores (S6C), the set of 6 laterally directed cores (L6C) and the complete 12 core set, which included the 6 traditional sextant and the 6 laterally directed cores. Biopsy Gleason score, number of positive cores, total cancer length and percent of tumor in the biopsy sets were examined for their ability to predict extracapsular extension, total tumor volume and pathological Gleason score. RESULTS: On univariable analyses the biopsy parameters of the complete 12 core set correlated more strongly with extracapsular extension and total tumor volume than the biopsy parameters of S6C or L6C. On multivariable analyses S6C and L6C were independent predictors of pathological features at prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 6 systematically obtained, laterally directed cores to traditional sextant biopsy improved the ability to predict pathological features at prostatectomy by a statistically and prognostically significant margin. Preoperative nomograms that use data from a full complement of 12 systematic cores, specifying sextant and laterally directed biopsy cores, should demonstrate improved performance in predicting prostatectomy pathology.     

Increased detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by additional sampling from the anterior lateral horns of the peripheral zone in combination with the standard sextant biopsy

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to investigate whether obtaining an increased number of biopsy cores by sampling additional areas, along with the standard sextant biopsy, results in a higher rate of detection of potentially insignificant prostate cancer. METHODS: We included 130 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at our institution between January 1999 and June 2003 after being diagnosed as having prostate cancer based on systematic prostate biopsies that included the areas examined by standard sextant biopsies and the bilateral anterior lateral horns (ALHs) of the peripheral zone (PZ). Several clinicopathological factors were analyzed, focusing on the significance of additional sampling from ALHs in relation to the incidence of potentially insignificant cancer, which was defined as organ confined disease with tumor volume less than 0.5 cc and Gleason scores <7. RESULTS: According to the location of positive biopsy results, these 130 patients were divided into three groups as follows: 61 patients (46.9%) with cancer detected from the cores taken by standard sextant biopsy only (group A), 15 (11.6%) from ALHs of the PZ only (group B), and 54 (41.5%) from both sites (group C). There were no significant differences in age, incidence of abnormal digital rectal examination, prostate volume, or biopsy Gleason score among these three groups; however, pretreatment serum PSA value in group C was significantly higher than that in groups A or B. Pathological examinations of radical prostatectomy specimens demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the incidence of lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion and perineural invasion, or Gleason score among the three groups; however, group C had a significantly larger tumor volume than groups A or B. Furthermore, insignificant tumor was detected in eight patients in group A (13.1%), two in group B (13.3%), and four in group C (7.4%). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the additional sampling of biopsy cores from ALHs does not appear to increase the detection of potentially insignificant cancer, and that biological tumor characteristics seem to be similar irrespective of cancer location on the needle biopsy.     

Clinical and pathologic features of prostate cancer detected after repeat false-negative biopsy in a screening population

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to investigate whether the clinical or pathologic features of prostate cancer (PCa) are related to the number of repeat biopsies required to establish the diagnosis of PCa. METHODS: Between February 1993 and August 2000, 653 patients were evaluated in this retrospective study. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy. The pathologic findings of specimens obtained at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection as well as PSA levels, findings on DRE, prostate volumes, transition zone volumes, and age were analyzed separately for all PCa patients diagnosed at the first set of biopsies (group A) and compared with the data of those diagnosed at the 2nd-5th set of biopsies (group B). In a second step, we compared the results obtained from patients diagnosed at the 2nd set of biopsies (group B1) with those of patients diagnosed at the 3rd to 5th set of biopsies (group B2). RESULTS: Gleason scores, pathologic tumor stages, and tumor volumes in group B were found to be significantly decreased compared to group A. But from the 2nd to 5th serial biopsy no further decrease in pathologic stage, Gleason score, or tumor volume was observed. On the contrary, there was a tendency towards higher tumor stages and Gleason scores. Of the tumors detected after the second false-negative set of biopsies almost 70% were lesions with Gleason scores of 6 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: False-negative results at the first needle biopsy are predictive of a lower pathologic stage and grade as well as smaller tumor volumes of PCa diagnosed at repeat sets of biopsies. False-negative results on repeat biopsy, however, have no prognostic significance for the tumor stage of PCas detected at subsequent sets of biopsies.