Acute and chronic effects of nifedipine in arterial hypertension

Summary Sublingual administration of nifedipine 10 mg to 11 patients and 20 mg to 6 patients with arterial hypertension caused a rapid and significant decrease in blood pressure in both groups. The average maximal reductions in the two groups were 21/16 mm Hg and 27/21 mm Hg. A concomitant rise in heart rate was found. Forearm blood flow showed a significant increase and the calculated vascular resistance a significant decrease 15–60 min after administration of both the 10 mg and the 20 mg doses. There was a negative correlation between basal vascular resistance and the maximal change of this parameter (r=–0.72, p<0.01). Plasma concentrations of nifedipine showed considerable individual variation, with slow absorption in some patients, which indicated failure of sublingual absorption in them. The difference between the mean plasma concentration in the two dose groups was statistically significant after 45 min. A negative correlation was present between the plasma concentration of nifedipine and the observed change in calculated vascular resistance (r=–0.74 at t=30 min). Treatment of 10 hypertensive patients with nifedipine 30–60 mg daily for 6 weeks reduced mean blood pressure from 175/115 mm Hg to 151/96 mm Hg (p<0.001). Heart rate and forearm blood flow rose, whereas the forearm vascular resistance showed a significant decrease. Side effects of a sensation of heat and reddening of face were noted in some patients. It is suggested that nifedipine may be useful both in the acute and chronic treatment of arterial hypertension.     

Acute haemodynamic effects of felodipine in congestive heart failure

Summary The haemodynamic effects of felodipine 0.1 mg/kg p.o., a new arteriolar dilator, were studied in 7 patients with severe congestive heart failure of NYHA Class IV (Group A) and in 3 patients in Class II–III (Group B). In Group A, measurements were made before and 1 and 4 h after felodipine administration. There was a substantial fall in systemic arterial pressure, which was not associated with a compensatory tachycardia. In fact, there was a fall in heart rate from 92 to 82 beats/min 1 h after drug administration. The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was reduced from 22 to 14 mm Hg and the cardiac index and stroke volume index rose significantly. Consequently, there was a marked reduction in systemic vascular resistance. In Group B measurements were performed at rest and during exercise before and 1 h after felodipine. The pulmonary wedge capillary pressure during exercise was lower than in the control situation. Coronary sinus flow was increased and there was a pronounced fall in coronary vascular resistance. The results would suggest that felodipine, by virtue of its ventricular unloading potency, might be a valuable drug in the treatment of congestive heart failure.     

The clinical effect of felodipine and nifedipine in Raynaud's phenomenon

Summary Sixteen patients participated in a double-blind cross-over trial comparing the effect of two dosages of the new calcium entry blocker, felodipine, with nifedipine in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon. The effect was evaluated using a symptom recording system. As no difference was found between the 3 treatments, the lower dose of felodipine (10 mg) may be preferable as only one dose per day is necessary.     

C-peptide has no effect on forearm blood flow during local hyperinsulinaemia in healthy humans

BACKGROUND: C-peptide increases forearm blood flow (FBF) in patients with Type 1 diabetes, probably by interaction with insulin, but not in healthy subjects. It is unclear if the vasodilating effect is sealed at normal fasting insulin concentrations. METHODS: The effects of C-peptide alone and during local hyperinsulinaemia were studied in healthy young men. Subjects received intra-arterial insulin at 6 pmol min-1 (low dose) or placebo for 60 min with subsequent coinfusion of C-peptide at increasing doses of 2-60 pmol min-1 in a double-blind crossover study (n = 8). In control experiments insulin at 30 pmol min-1 (high dose) was coinfused with C-peptide (n = 3). FBF was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography. RESULTS: Placebo had no effect on FBF (mean percentage change from baseline at 50 min -3.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]-14.9, + 8.7). Insulin infusion slightly enhanced FBF by + 10.2% (95% CI -6.8, + 27.2; low dose) and + 17.6% (95% CI -38.8, + 74.0; high dose), respectively. The mean individual difference of the change in FBF between low-dose insulin and placebo was + 13.3% (95% CI -6.0, + 32.7; P = NS). Infusion of C-peptide increased local C-peptide concentrations from 1.8 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1 to 6.1 +/- 2.8 ng ml-1, but had no effect on FBF during placebo or hyperinsulinaemia (mean difference vs low dose insulin -16.0%, 95% CI -38.9, + 6.9). CONCLUSION: The vasodilating effect of C-peptide seen in Type 1 diabetes is not detectable during fasting or hyperinsulinaemia in the forearm vasculature of healthy subjects. This suggests saturation of its vasodilating potency at insulin concentrations within the normal or in the supraphysiological range.     

The acute haemodynamic and renal effects of oral felodipine and ramipril in healthy subjects

Summary The aim of the present investigation was to compare the acute haemodynamic and renal effects of the calcium antagonist felodipine with the ACE inhibitor ramipril and with placebo.Single oral doses of felodipine 5 and 20 mg, ramipril 2.5 and 10 mg, and placebo were given to ten healthy subjects in a double-blind cross-over study. Blood pressure, heart rate, forearm blood flow (FBF), forearm vascular resistance (FVR), renal blood flow (RBF), renal vascular resistance (RVR), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), filtration fraction (FF), diuresis, and sodium excretion were recorded for 4.75 h after administration.Felodipine 20 mg caused a significant fall in diastolic blood pressure, maximal 12 % compared with placebo, while there were no significant effects of felodipine 5 mg or the two doses of ramipril. Heart rate increased significantly after both doses of felodipine, maximal 28% after the 20 mg dose. There was also a small but significant increase in heart rate of 12% after ramipril 2.5 mg. FVR fell significantly after both doses of felodipine, maximal 38 % after the 20 mg dose. There were no significant changes in FVR after any of the ramipril doses. Both doses of felodipine and both doses of ramipril caused significant reductions in RVR. Maximal reduction, 33 %, was found after felodipine 20 mg. There were no significant changes in GFR or FF with either drug. Felodipine caused a significant increase in natriuresis, maximal 129% while ramipril did not.     

Comparative effects of felodipine,nitrendipine and nifedipine in healthy subjects: concentration-effect relationships of racemic drugs and enantiomers

Summary The effects of racemic (rac) felodipine, rac-nitrendipine and nifedipine (all 20 mg solution p.o.) on non-invasively measured blood pressure and heart rate were investigated in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 normotensive, young, healthy males. Compared to baseline values, heart rate increased more after rac-felodipine treatment (+47% at maximum) than rac-nitrendipine (+40%) and nifedipine (+38%); only small and variable changes in blood pressure were observed with any of the drugs. The baseline-corrected area under the heart rate-time curve up to 4 h after the administration of rac-felodipine was 197% and 180% larger than after nifedipine and rac-nitrendipine treatment, respectively. The effects on heart rate could be fitted individually to a sigmoidal E_max-model without hysteresis for all drugs under investigation. The relative potencies of the unbound drugs for their indirect effects on heart rate were 1:7:43 for nifedipine, rac-nitrendipine and rac-felodipine, respectively. The active (S)-enantiomers of felodipine and nitrendipine appeared to be 9-and 60-times as potent as nifedipine in this respect, assuming no (inter)activity of the (R)-enantiomers. Individual and mean changes in blood pressure were small, they were not related to plasma concentrations, and did not differ between treatments.Pharmacokinetic data obtained in this study are reported in the accompanying paper     

The effects of urotensin II and urantide on forearm blood flow and systemic haemodynamics in humans

AIMS

(i) To compare the effects of intra-arterial administration of urotensin II in patients with CVD with healthy volunteers, and (ii) to study the haemodynamic effects of intra-arterial infusion of the urotensin II receptor antagonist, urantide.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients with CVD received a dose-ramped brachial artery infusion of urotensin II. A further six healthy male volunteers received a prolonged urotensin II infusion and 11 healthy male volunteers received a dose-ramped infusion of urantide. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured every 20 min and blood pressure and heart rate were assessed every 20 min.

RESULTS

In healthy volunteers and patients with CVD, intra-arterial infusion of urotensin II had no effect on FBF ratio. A dose-ramped infusion of urantide similarly had no effect on FBF ratio. During dose-ramped infusions of urotensin II and urantide, systolic and mean arterial blood pressure increased significantly. In healthy volunteers, urotensin II and urantide, respectively, increased systolic blood pressure from 133 ± 6 to 137 ± 5 mmHg (P < 0.01) and from 113 ± 4 to 120 ± 4 mmHg (P < 0.01). In patients with CVD, heart rate also significantly increased during dose-ramped infusion of urotensin II from 59 ± 3 to 62 ± 4 bpm (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown no in vivo effect of urotensin II or urantide on human forearm resistance vessels. Previous discrepancies do not seem to relate to either the age or CVD status of subjects. Changes in systemic cardiovascular haemodynamics during the dose-ramped infusion studies are unlikely to be caused by urotensin II receptor modulation.     

Natriuretic and diuretic effects of felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide after single and repeated doses

The effects of the calcium antagonist, felodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on natriuresis/diuresis and blood pressure were evaluated in 12 healthy subjects. The investigation was designed as a double-blind, three-way, randomised, crossover study, and all comparisons were performed against placebo. Urine volume, urine sodium excretion, heart rate and blood pressure were measured after a single dose of felodipine 10 mg, HCTZ 12.5 mg or placebo as well as during steady-state conditions (6 days of treatment with felodipine 10 mg b.i.d., HCTZ 12.5 mg b.i.d. or placebo).A significant increase in natriuresis was seen in the first 4 h after a single dose of felodipine and HCTZ, and the effect of felodipine was approximately 40% that of HCTZ. When the entire 24-h period after a single dose was studied, there was a significant increase in natriuresis after HCTZ, but not after felodipine, compared with placebo.A significant increase in diuresis was found in the first 4 h after a single dose of HCTZ, but not after felodipine, compared with placebo.Under steady-state conditions, there were no statistically significant differences between felodipine and placebo or HCTZ and placebo when the 24-h period, as a whole was considered.Potassium excretion was not affected by any of the drugs. Felodipine caused a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure in this study. This was not the case for HCTZ or placebo.     

Cross-over comparison of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release with blind 24 h ambulatory blood pressure assessments

1. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release (ER) in controlling 24 h ambulatory blood pressures (ABP) in hypertensive patients. 2. The study was a randomized cross-over design with a 2 week open placebo run-in phase and two observer-blind treatment periods. 3. Subjects were males and females, aged between 18 and 65 years, suffering from mild to moderate essential hypertension with a sitting mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) within the range of 95-114 mmHg. Twenty-three subjects were randomized to treatment; 15 patients completed the study. 4. Treatment intervention was 2 weeks of placebo followed by either 30 mg nifedipine OROS once daily or 5 mg felodipine ER once daily for 6 weeks, which was titrated up to 60 mg nifedipine OROS daily or 10 mg felodipine ER daily after 2 weeks of treatment on the lower doses if the DBP was > 90 mmHg. The main outcome measure was 24 h ABP after 6 weeks of active treatment, evaluated by an independent observer blinded as to treatment allocation. 5. Compared with placebo, mean (+/- SD) 24 h DBP was reduced by 6.2 +/- 6.8 and 5.2 +/- 5.1 mmHg after nifedipine and felodipine, respectively. The 24 h mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) fell by 11.8 +/- 10.9 and 10.1 +/- 8.2 mmHg for nifedipine and felodipine, respectively, compared with placebo. There were no significant differences between the two active treatments in the reduction of DBP or SBP during the 24 h period, daytime or night-time. 6. Similar antihypertensive effects are achieved with nifedipine Oros and felodipine ER when doses are individually titrated, with no significant differences between the two treatments.     

The cardiovascular effects of oral nifedipine and nicardipine: A double-blind comparison in healthy volunteers using transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography

The cardiovascular effects of single oral doses of nifedipine (5 and 10 mg) and nicardipine (20 and 30 mg) were compared in a placebo controlled double-blind crossover study involving 8 healthy male volunteers. Two hours following drug administration stroke volume and cardiac index were measured non-invasively using transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiography during passive tilting, graded bicycle exercise, and recovery from exercise. Two separate experiments were performed in the absence of active drug to allow the reproducibility of the measurements to be assessed. Coefficients of variation (within experiment/between experiments) for cardiac index were 7.0%/19.9% at rest and 11.5%/9.3% at 180 W exercise. Both nifedipine and nicardipine increased stroke volume and cardiac index and reduced total peripheral resistance (mean blood pressure/cardiac index) at all times in the experiment. Reductions in peripheral resistance were similar for nifedipine 10 mg and nicardipine 20 mg but in these doses slightly larger increases in heart rate were produced by nifedipine, and in stroke volume and cardiac index with nicardipine. The study shows that the cardiovascular effects of nifedipine and nicardipine can be detected using impedance cardiography which is a simple, safe, and inexpensive technique. The differences between the effects of the two drugs were small. Although some were of statistical significance and are consistent with a less marked cardiodepressant effect for nicardipine, the clinical importance of these observations is uncertain. Further studies to examine the effect of oral nifedipine and nicardipine in patients with impaired ventricular function may be helpful in clarifying this tissue.     

Atrial natriuretic peptides: Reproducibility of renal effects and response of liver blood flow

Summary To assess the variability of the response to exogenous atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), it was infused at the rate of 1 µg/min for 2 h in 6 salt-loaded normal volunteers under controlled conditions on 2 occasions at an interval of 1 week. The effect on solute excretion and the haemodynamic and endocrine actions were highly reproducible. The constant ANP infusion caused a delayed and prolonged excretion of sodium, chloride and calcium, no change in potassium or phosphate excretion or in glomerular filtration rate but a marked decrease in renal plasma flow. Blood pressure, heart rate and the plasma levels of angiotensin II, aldosterone, arginine vasopressin and plasma renin activity were unaltered. The effect of a 2-h infusion of ANP 0.5 µg/min or its vehicle on apparent hepatic blood flow (HBF) was also studied in 14 normal volunteers by measuring the indocyanine green clearance. A 21% decrease in HBF was observed in subjects who received the ANP infusion (p<0.01 vs vehicle). Thus, ANP infused at a dose that did not lower blood pressure decreased both renal and liver blood flow in normotensive volunteers. The renal and endocrine responses to ANP were reproducible over a 1-week interval.     

氨氯地平、非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗高血压疗效比较

目的：比较氨氯地平、非洛地平、缓释硝苯地平的降压疗效。方法：氨氯地平（５ ｍｇ, ｑｄ）、非洛地平（５ ｍｇ, ｑｄ）和缓释硝苯地平（３０ ｍｇ, ｑｄ）分别治疗高血压５３,５０和４９例,均连续口服用药 ２ ｗｋ。结果：３药降压有效率分别为８１％,７６％,７６％。３药尚有改善心肌缺血和心功能的作用。结论：３药降压作用均显著,具有服药方便、副作用小等优点。     

Acute cocaine effects on absolute cerebral blood flow

Cocaine use has been associated with vasoconstriction and stroke, and several studies have demonstrated that it decreases relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in humans. However, rCBF has not been quantitated. We compared 40 mg IV cocaine hydro-chloride to placebo effects on absolute rCBF in four cocaine users using 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT with a modified microsphere model for CBF quantitation. Cocaine produced significant decreases in rCBF in all regions studied with a mean decrease of 30% in absolute whole brain blood flow (P = 0.002) which was 3-fold greater than relative blood flow changes. Received: 12 February 1996/Final version: 12 June 1996     

Comparative pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of tiapamil in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic cirrhosis

Summary Tiapamil 70 mg was administered i.v. to 8 healthy male volunteers and 8 patients (7 males, 1 female) with biopsy proven hepatic cirrhosis. Two of the patients also received 600 mg p.o. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected and the parent drug in plasma and urine and desmethyl-tiapamil in urine were assayed by a specific HPLC method. The plasma and urine data for the parent drug after i.v. and p.o. dosing were simultaneously fitted to linear p.o. and i.v. two compartment models with exit from and input into the central compartment. Absorption was assumed to be a first order process. In the volunteers the mean pharmacokinetic parameters were: 101 l for the steady-state volume of distribution, 750 ml·min^–1 for nonrenal clearance, 195 ml·min^–1 for renal clearance and 1.7 h for the half-life of the terminal disposition phase. The urinary recoveries of the parent drug and desmethyltiapamil averaged 21.4 and 0.8% of the dose, respectively. In the patients the steady-state volume of distribution, the amount of unchanged drug in urine and the half-life of the terminal disposition phase were significantly increased (171 l, 29.0% of the dose, 3.5 h, respectively). Decreased plasma protein binding in the patients accounted for the larger steady-state volume of distribution. The nonrenal clearance of 519 ml·min^–1, tended to be smaller in the patients than in the volunteers. Together with the increased urinary recovery of tiapamil in the patients this indicates a moderately impaired elimination capacity in the cirrhotics. The renal clearance was similar in the patients (213 ml·min^–1) and the volunteers. The absolute oral bioavailability of tiapamil was 55 and 49% in 2 patients. No effects of tiapamil on heart rate or supine blood pressure were detected, either in volunteers or in patients. Negative dromotropic effects were found in 2 volunteers and 2 patients after i.v. dosing.     

Peripheral haemodynamic effects of smoking in habitual smokers. A methodological study

Summary The effect of smoking on forearm haemodynamics was studied in four groups of healthy subjects, who had all smoked cigarettes (10–15 cigarettes/day) on average for 10 years. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, forearm blood flow, forearm vascular resistance and pulse wave velocity were determined before and every 15 min for 75 min after smoking two cigarettes within 10 min. The inhaled nicotine was about 2.2 mg. There was no significant difference between the four groups in any haemodynamic variable before or after smoking, which indicated adequate reproducibility of the parameters studied and so made it possible to pool the results from all 30 subjects.Smoking significantly increased blood pressure, heart rate and pulse wave velocity and decreased forearm blood flow. Forearm vascular resistance remained unchanged. The rises in systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity were transient and both peaked (7% and 28%, respectively) 15 min after smoking. In contrast, heart rate and diastolic blood pressure remained significantly elevated and forearm blood flow was significantly decreased throughout the 75 min follow-up. The maximal changes were: heart rate +34%, diastolic blood pressure +17%, and forearm blood flow –24%. It is concluded that smoking produces statistically significant changes in forearm haemodynamics affecting both small and large arteries. The reproducibility of the study design means that it can be used to evaluate substances which may antagonize the haemodynamic effects of tobacco smoking.     

Acute renal effects of oral felodipine in normal man

Summary The acute renal effects of a single oral dose of felodipine 0.15 mg/kg were studied in 8 healthy males. Thirty minutes after administration the mean plasma concentration was 25.7 nmol/l. There was a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure (24%) and a concomitant rise in heart rate (38%), leaving the systolic pressure unchanged. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured by the constant infusion technique using the clearance of¹²⁵I-iothalamate and¹³¹I-hippuran respectively. GFR was unchanged and the filtration fraction (FF) was reduced, whilst there was a decrease in renal vascular resistance (RVR). The glomerular filter characteristics were unchanged, as estimated by the unchanged excretion rate of albumin. There was a significant rise in the clearance of sodium (176%) but only a small and insignificant increase in urine volume. Clearance of potassium was decreased. An increase in the clearance of uric acid and a rise in the beta-2-microglobulin excretion rate were found, both suggesting a proximal tubular effect of felodipine. The excretion rate of calcium was increased.     

Effect of fingolimod (FTY720) on cerebral blood flow,platelet function and macular thickness in healthy volunteers

Aim

Fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is the first oral disease modifying therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of fingolimod on cerebral blood flow, platelet function and macular thickness in healthy volunteers.

Methods

The study included 88 healthy volunteers who received fingolimod 0.5 mg or 1.25 mg or matched placebo over a period of 4 weeks. Transcranial colour coded sonography was performed to measure mean blood flow velocities, the platelet function was measured by the PFA-100® assay using a collagen/epinephrine cartridge and macular thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography. An assessment of non-inferiority of fingolimod vs. placebo was performed against a reference value (20% of the overall baseline value).

Results

All 88 randomized participants completed the study. At day 28 compared with baseline value, for 0.5 mg, 1.25 mg and placebo treatments, the mean middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity decreased by 4, 1 and 3.7 cm s⁻¹, respectively. The platelet function analyzer closure time increase was not significant (7.8, 7.5 and 10.4 s, respectively). The mean percentage change in the central foveal thickness from baseline for both eyes was below 3% for all groups. The safety profile of fingolimod in this study was found consistent with the previous reports.

Conclusions

In healthy volunteers, the changes seen with both fingolimod doses were found to be within normal variability, non-inferior and comparable with those observed with placebo for all the pharmacodynamic parameters assessed.     

The extrapulmonary effects of inhaled hexoprenaline and salbutamol in healthy individuals

Summary We have investigated the cardiovascular and metabolic effects of multiple inhaled doses of salbutamol and hexoprenaline in 12 healthy volunteers. They inhaled 200 g of salbutamol or hexoprenaline at 15 min intervals for 60 min from a metered dose inhaler (total dose 1000 g). We measured heart rate, blood pressure, total electromechanical systole (as a measure of inotropic response), QT_c interval on the ECG, and plasma potassium at baseline, 10 min after each inhalation, and 30 and 60 min after the last inhalation.There was no difference in the effects of the two drugs on blood pressure, total electromechanical systole, or QT_c interval. Salbutamol significantly increased heart rate compared with hexoprenaline. Hexoprenaline caused a significantly greater fall in plasma potassium compared with salbutamol.