Risk factors for diseases of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although pouchitis is considered the most common adverse sequela of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions other than pouchitis are increasingly being recognized. The risk factors for these non-pouchitis conditions, including Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome (IPS), have not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases of IPAA in a tertiary care setting. METHODS: The study consisted of 240 consecutive patients who were classified as having healthy pouches (N = 49), pouchitis (N = 61), CD of the pouch (N = 39), cuffitis (N = 41), or IPS (N =50). Demographic and clinical features were assessed to determine risk factors for each of these conditions by using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Risk factors remaining in the final logistic regression models were for pouchitis: IPAA indication for dysplasia (odds ratio [OR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-8.98), never having smoked (OR, 5.09; 95% CI, 1.01-25.69), no use of anti-anxiety agents (OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.45-18.59), or use of NSAIDs (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.71-6.13); for CD of the pouch: a long duration of IPAA (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30) and current smoking (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.39-16.25); for cuffitis: arthralgias (OR, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.91-8.94) and younger age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33); and for IPS: use of antidepressants (OR, 4.17, 95% CI, 1.95-8.92) or anti-anxiety agents (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.34-7.47). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of risk factors for the 4 inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions of IPAA are different, suggesting that each of these diseases has a different etiology and pathogenesis. The identification and modification of these risk factors might help patients and clinicians to make a preoperative decision for IPAA, reduce IPAA-related morbidity, and improve response to treatment.     

Endoscopic balloon dilation of ileal pouch strictures

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice in patients with ulcerative colitis. Strictures can occur at the inlet and outlet of the pouch. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been successfully used in patients with Crohn's strictures at the small intestine and colon. There are no published trials on endoscopic balloon therapy of ileal pouch strictures. AIM: To evaluate outpatient endoscopic balloon dilation of strictures in ileal pouches. METHODS: Patients underwent nonfluoroscopy-guided, nonsedated, outpatient endoscopic dilations with an 8.6-mm upper endoscope and through-the-scope balloons (size: 11-18 mm). Pre- and posttreatment Pouchitis Disease Activity Index symptom scores (range: 0-6), endoscopic stricture scores based on resistance in passing the endoscope (range: 0-4), and Cleveland Global Quality of Life were compared. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with pouch strictures who had concurrent Crohn's disease of the pouch (n = 11), cuffitis (n = 5), and pouchitis (n = 3), including 14 inlet and 14 outlet strictures, were enrolled. The mean number of strictures for each patient was 1.61 +/- 0.78. All strictures were successfully dilated with the through-the-scope balloon, with a mean of 1.74 +/- 1.19 (range: 1-5) sessions for each patient. Nine patients had a second endoscopy at 8 wk and five patients had a third pouch endoscopy at 16 wk after the initial endoscopic dilation. Endoscopic stricture scores immediately (0.30 +/- 0.47), 8 wk (0.40 +/- 0.51), and 16 wk (0.44 +/- 0.76) after the dilation were significantly improved compared to the predilation stricture scores (2.67 +/- 0.78). The symptom scores and quality-of-life (QOL) scores improved at week 8 and 16 following dilation, with a mean follow-up of 6.10 +/- 5.83 months (2-25 months). No complications were experienced with the procedure. One patient with CD who failed endoscopic and medical therapy underwent pouch resection. CONCLUSION: In conjunction with medical therapy, outpatient endoscopic balloon dilation appears safe and effective in treating pouch inlet and outlet strictures, by relieving symptoms, restoring pouch patency, and improving QOL in the majority of patients.     

Irritable pouch syndrome: a new category of diagnosis for symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: Pouchitis often is diagnosed based on symptoms alone. However, increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal pain could be due to a condition resembling irritable bowel syndrome. This study was designed to assess the etiology of bowel symptoms using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). METHODS: Symptoms, endoscopy, and histology were assessed in 61 consecutive symptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouchitis was defined as a PDAI score of > or = 7, cuffitis was defined as endoscopic and histological inflammation of the rectal cuff and no inflammation of the pouch, and irritable pouch syndrome (IPS) was defined as symptoms with a PDAI of <7 and the absence of cuffitis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (50.8%) had pouchitis, four (6.5%) had cuffitis, and 26 (42.6%) had IPS. Demographics were similar in the three groups. Increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal cramps were the most common symptoms in the three groups. Rectal bleeding was seen only in cuffitis (p < 0.001). No patient in the three groups had fever. Twenty-seven patients (87.1%) with pouchitis responded to a 2-wk course of ciprofloxacin or metronidazole with a reduction in PDAI scores of > or = 3. All four patients with cuffitis responded to topical hydrocortisone or mesalamine with a reduction in the PDAI symptom component score of > or = 1. Twelve patients with IPS (46.2%) responded to antidiarrheal, anticholinergic, and/or antidepressant therapies with a reduction in the PDAI symptom component score of > or = 1, whereas the remaining patients had persistent symptoms despite therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of symptomatic patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not meet the diagnostic criteria for either pouchitis or cuffitis and have been classified as having IPS. There is an overlap of symptoms among patients with pouchitis, cuffitis, and IPS, and endoscopic evaluation can differentiate among these groups. Distinction between these three groups has therapeutic implications.     

Fecal lactoferrin for diagnosis of symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal pain in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) may be due to inflammatory conditions, including pouchitis, cuffitis, or Crohn's disease or noninflammatory conditions such as irritable pouch syndrome. Distinction among these entities requires pouch endoscopy and biopsy. Noninvasive means of diagnosis are preferable. METHODS: Sixty consecutive subjects with IPAA for inflammatory bowel disease had measurements of fecal lactoferrin and alpha1-antitrypsin and underwent pouch endoscopy with biopsy, with calculation of the pouchitis disease activity index in a prospective cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Symptomatic patients with an inflammatory condition had significantly higher fecal lactoferrin concentrations (median, 176.0 microg/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 79.0-450.8) compared with those with a noninflammatory condition (median, 4.8 microg/mL; IQR, 1.2-11.0) or those who were asymptomatic (median, 7.8 microg/mL; IQR, 1.4-12.9), P < 0.001. At a cutoff level of 7 microg/mL, fecal lactoferrin could distinguish patients with irritable pouch syndrome from those with pouchitis, cuffitis, or Crohn's disease with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 85%. Fecal alpha1-antitrypsin was not able to distinguish symptomatic patients with and without an inflammatory condition. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal lactoferrin can serve as a sensitive and noninvasive initial screening test in an algorithm for evaluation of symptomatic patients with IPAA. If fecal lactoferrin levels are low (<7 microg/mL), IPS can be diagnosed. If fecal lactoferrin levels are high, pouch endoscopy with biopsy is warranted to distinguish among different causes of inflammation. Longitudinal studies are needed to define better the role of this test in the management of patients with IPAA.     

Diagnosis and treatment of ileal pouch diseases in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis

Opinion statement Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after total proctocolectomy is the surgical treatment of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease or dysplasia. IPAA significantly improves quality of life in UC patients who require surgery. However, certain inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases can develop after the surgery, including pouchitis, Crohn’s disease (CD) of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome. The cause and pathogenesis of these disease conditions of IPAA are largely unknown. Accurate diagnosis and classification are important for appropriate management.     

Inflammatory pouch disease: The spectrum of pouchitis

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis(IPAA) is the operation of choice for medically refractory ulcerative colitis(UC), for UC with dysplasia, and for familial adenomatous polyposis(FAP). IPAA can be a treatment option for selected patients with Crohn's colitis without perianal and/or small bowel disease. The term "pouchitis" refers to nonspecific inflammation of the pouch and is a common complication in patients with IPAA; it occurs more often in UC patients than in FAP patients. This suggests that the pathogenetic background of UC may contribute significantly to the development of pouchitis. The symptoms of pouchitis are many, and can include increased bowel frequency, urgency, tenesmus, incontinence, nocturnal seepage, rectal bleeding, abdominal cramps, and pelvic discomfort. The diagnosis of pouchitis is based on the presence of symptoms together with endoscopic and histological evidence of inflammation of the pouch. However, "pouchitis" is a general term representing a wide spectrum of diseases and conditions, which can emerge in the pouch. Based on the etiology we can sub-divide pouchitis into 2 groups: idiopathic and secondary. In idiopathic pouchitis the etiology and pathogenesis are still unclear, while in secondary pouchitis there is an association with a specific causative or pathogenetic factor. Secondary pouchitis can occur in up to 30% of cases and can be classified as infectious, ischemic, non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs-induced, collagenous, autoimmuneassociated, or Crohn's disease. Sometimes, cuffitis or irritable pouch syndrome can be misdiagnosed as pouchitis. Furthermore, idiopathic pouchitis itself can be sub-classified into types based on the clinical pattern, presentation, and responsiveness to antibiotic treatment. Treatment differs among the various forms of pouchitis. Therefore, it is important to establish the correct diagnosis in order to select the appropriatetreatment and further management. In this editorial, we present the spectrum of pouchitis and the specific features related to the diagnosis and treatment of the various forms.     

Suppurative granulomatous inflammation in the ileo-anal pouch

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly performed for medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), however with multiple possible complications, most notably pouchitis, cuffitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch and irritable pouch syndrome. We present a unique case of suppurative granulomatous inflammation in the ileal pouch mucosa, most likely infective in nature, that is unrelated to recognised causes of such pathology, especially yersiniosis.     

Clinical approach to diseases of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease or dysplasia. IPAA significantly improves quality of life in UC patients who require surgery. However, certain inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases can develop after the surgery, including pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome. The etiology and pathogenesis of these disease conditions of IPAA are largely unknown. Accurate diagnosis and classification are important for appropriate management. Endoscopic evaluation is the most important tool for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis.     

Correlation between serum serotonin and endoscopy inflammation scores in patients with ileal pouches

BackgroundInflammatory and functional complications are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The pathogenesis of these complications remains poorly understood, and there is discrepancy between the clinical symptoms and objective endoscopic inflammation scores in these patients. While serum serotonin level has been reported to be associated with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, its association with ileal pouch disorders has not been studied.AimTo investigate the association between serum serotonin level and symptoms and endoscopic inflammation in patients with IPAA.MethodsA total of 185 consecutive eligible IPAA patients who presented to a specialized Pouchitis Clinic from Jan 2009 to May 2009 were prospectively recruited. Patients were divided into 4 groups: normal pouch, irritable pouch syndrome (IPS), inflammatory pouch disorders (Crohn's disease, acute and chronic pouchitis, and cuffitis), and surgical complications. Serum serotonin level was measured and analyzed for correlation with clinical and endoscopic inflammation scores.ResultsDemographic and clinical variables were evaluated, including age, gender, smoking history, duration of UC, duration of the pouch, and disease category of the pouch. The median fasting serum serotonin level was comparable among the 4 groups: 94.0 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 70.0, 128.1), 89.2 ng/ml (IQR 54.2, 155.9), 90.3 ng/ml (IQR 49.7, 164.1), 77.9 ng/ml (IQR 54.7, 129.0), for normal pouch, irritable pouch, inflammatory pouch disorders, and surgical complication groups, respectively (p = 0.91). A significant association between serum serotonin level and the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) endoscopy subscore of the pouch (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2, 2.9, p < 0.05) and total PDAI endoscopy score (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.8, p < 0.05) in the inflammatory complication group were noted.ConclusionsSerum serotonin level appears to correlate with the PDAI endoscopy subscores and total PDAI score in patients with inflammatory complications suggesting that the hormone may be involved in mechanisms of mucosal inflammation. These findings may promote future treatment strategies for patients with pouch inflammation.     

Diagnosis and Management of Pouchitis and Ileoanal Pouch Dysfunction

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the surgical treatment of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or UC with dysplasia and for the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. However, UC patients with IPAA are susceptible to inflammatory and noninflammatory sequelae, such as pouchitis, Crohn’s disease of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome, in addition to common surgery-associated complications, which adversely affect the surgical outcome and compromise health-related quality of life. Pouchitis is the most frequent long-term complication of IPAA in patients with UC, with a cumulative prevalence of up to 50%. Pouchitis may be classified based on the etiology into idiopathic and secondary types, and the management is often different. Pouchoscopy is the most important tool for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis in patients with pouch dysfunction. Antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for active pouchitis. Some patients may develop dependency on antibiotics, requiring long-term maintenance therapy. Although management of antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis has been challenging, secondary etiology for pouchitis should be evaluated and modified, if possible.     

Treatment of rectal cuff inflammation (cuffitis) in patients with ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice in the majority of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who require surgery. To ease the construction of the IPAA and improve functional outcome by minimizing sphincter related stretch injury, a stapling technique is being commonly used in the pouch-anal anastomosis. Despite its advantages, the procedure normally leaves a 1-2 cm of anal transitional zone or rectal cuff, which is susceptible to recurrence of residual UC or cuffitis. Cuffitis can cause symptoms mimicking pouchitis. AIM: To conduct an open-labeled trial of topical mesalamine in patients with cuffitis. METHODS: We treated 14 consecutive patients with cuffitis by giving mesalamine suppositories 500 mg b.i.d. (mean 3.2 months, range 1-9 months). The Cuffitis Activity Index (adapted from the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index) scores and improvement in symptoms of bloody bowel movements and arthralgias were measured as primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: All patients had surgery for medically refractory UC. There were significant reductions in the total Cuffitis Activity Index scores after the therapy (11.93 +/- 3.17 vs 6.21 +/- 3.19, p < 0.001). Symptom (3.24 +/- 1.28 vs 1.79 +/- 1.31), endoscopy (3.14 +/- 1.29 vs 1.00 +/- 1.52), and histology (4.93 +/- 1.77 vs 3.57 +/- 1.39) scores each were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Ninety-two percent of patients with bloody bowel movements and 70% of patients with arthralgias improved after the therapy. No systemic or topical adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Topical mesalamine appears well tolerated and effective in treating patients with cuffitis, with improvement in symptom as well as endoscopic and histologic inflammation.     

Pouchitis: A spectrum of diseases

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis patients who require surgery. Pouchitis is the most common longterm complication after IPAA. Patients with pouchitis represent a heterogeneous group in terms of pathogenesis, clinical presentation, disease course, and prognosis, suggesting a wide range of disease mechanisms. Before the diagnosis of pouchitis is made, other inflammatory and non-inflammatory disease conditions, such as Crohn’s disease, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome, should be ruled out. Pouch endoscopy is the most important tool for diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis and classification are essential for appropriate management. Although the majority of patients with pouchitis respond to antibiotic therapy, a subset of these patients cannot achieve remission by means of antibiotics and thus require anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatment.     

Possible role of human cytomegalovirus in pouchitis after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

AIMTo detect the presence of human cytomegalovirus(HCMV)proteins and genes on the ileal pouch of patients with ulcerative colitis who have undergone proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(IPAA).METHODSImmunohistochemistry,polymerase chain reaction(PCR)and PCR sequencing methods were utilized to test the presence of HCMV in pouch specimens taken from 34 patients in 86 endoscopies.RESULTSHCMV genes and proteins were detected in samples from 12(35.2%)patients.The rate of detection was significant in the endoscopies from patients diagnosed with pouchitis(5 of 12,41.6%),according to the Japanese classification of pouchitis,in comparison to patients with normal pouch(7 of 62,11.2%;P = 0.021).In all patients with pouchitis in which the HCMV was detected,it was the first episode of pouchitis.The virus was not detected in previous biopsies taken in normal endoscopies of these patients.During the followup,HCMV was detected in one patient with recurrent pouchitis and in 3 patients whose pouchitis episodes improved but whose positive endoscopic findings persisted.CONCLUSIONHCMV can take part in the inflammatory process of the pouch in some patients with ulcerative colitis who have undergone proctocolectomy with IPAA.     

Immunodulation with tacrolimus (FK506): results of a prospective, open-label, non-controlled trial in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Tacrolimus (FK506) is widely used in the organ transplant setting, but not in the treatment of IBD. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness of tacrolimus in specific clinical presentations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in which recurrence is likely. PATIENTS AND METHODS: inclusion criteria were: perianal Crohn's disease (PCD), CD in rectal stump, pouchitis and cuffitis with severely impaired function of the ileoanal pouch (IPAA), and proven refractoriness to other therapies. Clinical assessment: Hughes' classification (PCD); Oresland index (OI) in IPAA, endoscopy-biopsy and Quality of life (QoL) using the Spanish version of the IBDQ. Response was determined as complete (CP), partial (PR) or non-existent (NR). Tacrolimus was administered orally at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day (levels 5-15 .g/L). RESULTS: nineteen patients entered the study. Mean duration of treatment was 9.6 +/- 6.3 months. In PCD, CR was reported in 66% of cases and PR in 33%, with disappearance of inflammation, stenosis and ulcers. In patients with pouchitis and cuffitis,77% presented either CR or PR. The OI scores and QoL improved significantly after treatment (p<0.006 and p<0.002, respectively). Adverse effects were minor and controlled by regulating the dose. CONCLUSION: oral administration of tacrolimus is easy to per-form and has few adverse effects when used to treat IBD in certain clinical presentations with a high likelihood of recurrence.     

Histologic and microbiologic features of biopsy samples from patients with normal and inflamed pouches

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the electron microscopic and microbiologic findings in tissue biopsy samples from patients with pouchitis and to compare them with findings in patients with normal pouches, conventional ileostomies, and normal ileum. METHODS: Tissue samples were obtained from 78 patients: 23 patients with normal pouches endoscopically and histologically (Group 1), 12 patients with endoscopic and histologic evidence of inflammation (pouchitis) (Group 2), 14 patients who had either endoscopic or histologic evidence of inflammation but not both (Group 3), 20 patients with conventional ileostomies (Group 4), and 9 patients without ileostomies from whom biopsy samples of normal ileum were obtained (Group 5). RESULTS: The mean total aerobic facultative counts in the biopsy samples from the pouchitis patients were significantly higher when compared with biopsy samples from Groups 4 and 5 ( P <0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean anaerobic counts among the five groups. Positive cultures were obtained in 90 percent of patients with pouches compared with 69 percent of patients with conventional ileostomies or normal ileum ( P <0.05). Intramural bacteria were observed on electron microscopy in biopsy specimens of 47 percent patients with pouches compared with 14 percent of patients with conventional ileostomies or normal ileum ( P <0.05). However, the proportion of patients with positive cultures or intramural bacteria was not increased in the pouchitis group compared with the normal pouch group. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that intramural aerobic facultative bacterial counts are elevated in patients with pouchitis and may play a role in the pathogenesis of pouchitis.This work was supported by a grant from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America.This work has been published previously as an abstract in Gastroenterology 1991;100:A230.     

Effect of Withdrawal of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use on Ileal Pouch Disorders

NSAID use has been shown to exacerbate disease activity of inflammatory bowel disease. The detrimental effect of NSAIDs on the ileal pouch has not been characterized. To study the effect of withdrawal of NSAID use on ileal pouch disorders. The study consisted of a cohort of 17 symptomatic patients seen in the Pouchitis Clinic who had ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with chronic (>6 months) daily use of NSAIDs. The patients were treated by withdrawing NSAID use. The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) consisting of symptom, endoscopy and histology scores, and Cleveland Global Quality of Life, Irritable Bowel Disease Quality of Life, and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire scores were measured before and after a 4-week intervention. The cohort consisted of 11 patients with chronic refractory pouchitis (65%), 2 with acute pouchitis (12%), 1 with cuffitis (6%), 1 with cuffitis and chronic refractory pouchitis (6%), and 2 with irritable pouch syndrome (12%). The withdrawal of NSAID use alone resulted in a significant reduction in the mean PDAI scores of −3.6 ± −3.0 (p<0.02) and a significant improvement in mean quality-of-life scores (p<0.05). Patients with pouch disorders who regularly used NSAIDs appeared to benefit from the complete cessation of such agents, suggesting an association between NSAID use and pouch disorders. This work is supported by NIH R03 DK 067275 and an American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Research Award (to B.S.).     

Altered expression of the lymphocyte activation markers CD30 and CD27 in patients with pouchitis

BACKGROUND: The mechanism underlying the development of ileal pouch inflammation in ulcerative colitis patients (pouchitis) after restorative proctocolectomy is unclear. Persistent systemic T cell activation or expansion of specific memory cell populations could predispose certain patients to develop local inflammation within the neo-rectum. Therefore, the aim was to study the expression of the lymphocyte activation markers CD27, CD30, CD25 and CD69 on the CD45RO+ memory cell subset of isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), soluble CD30 levels and mucosal CD30 expression in patients with pouchitis and in controls. METHODS: Flow cytometry was performed on PBMC isolated from patients with pouchitis (n = 9), without pouchitis (n = 10) and normal controls (n = 9). Serum CD30 was measured in patients with pouchitis (n = 25), without pouchitis (n = 26) and normal controls (n = 20) by ELISA. CD30 expression was quantified in pouchitis (n = 15) and normal pouch (n = 15) mucosa using a three-stage immunoperoxidase method. RESULTS: Naive CD45RO-CD27+ PBMC were significantly decreased in pouchitis (25.6%) compared to normal controls (34.4%), (P = 0.03). CD30, CD25 and CD69 subsets did not differ between the groups. Serum CD30 was increased in pouchitis patients 58 (1-380) U/ml compared to non-pouchitis 16.5 (1-290) U/ml, P=0.007, and normal controls 11 (2-80) U/ml, P = 0.0005. In the mucosa, the numbers of CD30+ cells were increased in pouchitis compared to non-inflamed pouches (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Increased sCD30 in pouchitis is associated with elevated mucosal expression. Of the activation markers studied, only the circulating na?ve CD27+ population differed in pouchitis patients compared with controls. The observed decrease in this cell type may reflect antigen priming and subsequent loss of CD27 implying that antigen driven activation of specific T cell subsets may occur in pouchitis.     

Clinical Features of Ileal Pouch Polyps in Patients with Underlying Ulcerative Colitis

Purpose Polypoid lesions rarely occur in the ileal pouch in ulcerative colitis patients after restorative proctocolectomy. Clinical features, malignant potential, and management of pouch polyps have not been characterized. Methods We identified 23 ulcerative colitis patients with large polyps (size≥1 cm) of the ileal pouch from our 2,512-case ulcerative colitis pouch database. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were reviewed. The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index symptom score (range, 0–6) was used to quantify patients’ symptoms before and after polypectomy. Results Of the 23 patients, 95.7 percent (22 patients) had pouch endoscopy indicated for the evaluation of symptoms when polyps were detected, and 60.9 percent of patients had the polyps in the pouch, 26.1 percent in the anal transitional zone, and 21.7 percent in the afferent limb. The mean size of pouch polyps was 1.9 cm ± 1 cm. Twenty-one patients (91.3 percent) had concomitant pouchitis, cuffitis, or Crohn’s disease. On histology, 21 patients (91.3 percent) had inflammatory-type polyps, and 2 (8.7 percent) had dysplastic or malignant polyps. In 18 patients who had endoscopic polypectomy with concurrent medical therapy, the prepolypectomy and postpolypectomy mean symptom scores were 3.4 ± 1.7 and 1.1 ± 1.2 points, respectively (P = 0.015). Two patients (8.7 percent) had pouch excision for malignancy or for concomitant chronic refractory pouchitis. Conclusions The majority of patients with large ileal pouch polyps were symptomatic. These polyps were typically detected on the background of pouchitis, cuffitis, or Crohn’s disease. Although the majority of polyps were inflammatory type, polyps in two patients were dysplastic or malignant. Endoscopic polypectomy with concomitant medical therapy seemed to improve patients’ symptom scores. Supported in part by a NIH grant R03 DK 067275 and an American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Research Award (to B.S.). Poster presentation at meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 30 to November 2, 2005. Reprints are not available.