Measuring aspirin resistance, clopidogrel responsiveness, and postprocedural markers of myonecrosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Aspirin and clopidogrel are proven to prevent thromboembolic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Enzyme release of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) enzyme during PCI has been associated with an increased risk of future adverse cardiac events. This study examined the correlation between measurements of aspirin resistance and the level of inhibition of the thienopyridine-specific P2Y12 platelet receptor and CK-MB release after PCI. We prospectively studied 330 patients with elective PCI treated with drug-eluting stents. Patients were pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients with positive CK-MB or acute coronary syndrome and those on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were excluded. Serum assays of aspirin resistance (Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay-ASA, Accumetrics) and clopidogrel resistance (Rapid Platelet Function Assay P2Y12, Accumetrics) were performed before PCI. Serum troponinI and CK-MB levels were measured at 8, 16, and 24 hours after PCI. Aspirin resistance unit (ARU) measurement > or =550 was detected in 12 patients (3.7%). Mean platelet reactivity unit (PRU; measurement of inhibition of P2Y12 activity) was 192.2 +/- 95.4 (lower PRU, more inhibition of P2Y12 receptor). There was no correlation between level of ARU or PRU and troponin I or CK-MB release after PCI at any time point. Only multivessel coronary disease was found to be a predictor of any increase in CK-MB in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 3.3, p = 0.0003). A positive correlation was found between levels of ARU and PRU. Target vessel revascularization/major adverse cardiac event rate at 6 months was 8.2% with no correlation between ARU or PRU and release of cardiac enzymes or occurrence of adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, this study does not support routine measurements of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in stable patients undergoing PCI.     

Relation of aspirin resistance to coronary flow reserve in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Previous studies have shown that more complete platelet inhibition improves the coronary flow reserve (CFR), a measure of microvascular integrity, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We hypothesized that patients with aspirin resistance would have impaired CFR after elective PCI. We used VerifyNow Aspirin to determine the response to aspirin in 117 consecutive patients who underwent elective single-lesion PCI. The assay results are expressed quantitatively in Aspirin Reaction Units based on the degree of platelet aggregation. All patients received a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel >12 hours before and a 75-mg maintenance dose the morning of PCI. CFR was estimated using the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count method. Of the 117 patients, 22 (18.8%) were aspirin resistant. The clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics of the aspirin-sensitive and -resistant patients were balanced. All patients underwent successful PCI with <50% residual diameter stenosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow after PCI. Aspirin-resistant patients had a lower CFR than the aspirin-sensitive patients (1.42 +/- 0.35 vs 1.80 +/- 0.64, p = 0.018). Univariate correlates of CFR included the Aspirin Reaction Unit (r = -0.227, p = 0.014) and post-PCI creatine kinase-MB elevation (p = 0.048). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed the Aspirin Reaction Unit to be the only independent determinant of CFR after PCI (r2 = 0.051, p = 0.014). Thus, aspirin resistance was associated with impaired CFR in patients who underwent elective PCI, implicating insufficient aspirin-induced platelet inhibition as a cause of microvascular dysfunction by distal atherothrombotic embolization and/or spasm.     

Impact of angina class on inhibition of platelet aggregation following clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing coronary intervention: Do we need more aggressive dosing regimens in unstable angina?

Pretreatment with thienopyridines has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We determine the impact of angina class on inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) following clopidogrel loading. Seventy-two patients (mean age, 64 +/- 11 years; 76% male) were pretreated with 450 mg of clopidogrel at least 3 hr prior to PCI. All patients received ASA 325 mg prior to the procedure. Patients were classified into two groups according to angina class: group 1 = stable angina or Braunwald class 1 unstable angina (UA; n = 33); group 2 = Braunwald class 2 or 3 UA (n = 39). IPA was measured prior to PCI, with the Ichor point-of-care platelet analyzer (Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX), using 20 microM of ADP. Group 2 patients were more likely to have prior MI (54% vs. 27%; P = 0.023), prior CABG (33% vs. 5%; P = 0.046), and received IV heparin (64% vs. 27%; P = 0.0018). Mean IPA was significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1 (19% +/- 22% vs. 32% +/- 22%; P = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, higher angina class was independently associated with lower IPA (P = 0.018). Patients with UA undergoing PCI have a lower IPA following clopidogrel loading with 450 mg. This may indicate the possibility of clopidogrel resistance in such patients.     

Cilostazol could ameliorate platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol increases the cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels in platelets and might ameliorate the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel. This study investigated the additional effect of cilostazol on platelet aggregation measured by a VerifyNow analyzer and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) as a marker of activated platelet in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty cases of primary PCI were randomly assigned to dual (aspirin and clopidogrel) or triple (dual plus cilostazol) therapy. The antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel were evaluated by VerifyNow tests. The plasma sCD40L levels at admission, 24 h and 21 days were measured by the ELISA method. The arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation was similar in both groups. However, the triple group had a significantly lower P2Y12 reaction unit (dual 208.8+/-69.0 vs triple 168.2+/-79.2, p=0.041) and higher % inhibition of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (dual 23.8+/-21.4% vs triple 40.5+/-21.0%, p=0.004). In the multivariate analysis, cilostazol was a negative predictor for low responders to clopidogrel (95% confidence interval 0.067-0.711). The plasma sCD40L levels were not significantly different between the 2 groups at the same point of time. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cilostazol to the combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel significantly increases the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. However, there was no additive effect on aspirin-induced antiplatelet activity or lowering of sCD40L.     

Clinical outcomes of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in Koreans receiving elective percutaneous coronary intervention (from results of the CROSS VERIFY study)

Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel therapy varies among patients. Whether clopidogrel response variability can predict clinical outcomes has not been verified in Asians. A prospective cohort was analyzed to evaluate clinical impact of clopidogrel response variability in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 809 consecutive patients receiving clopidogrel after elective PCI were followed for 1 year. On-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) after clopidogrel therapy was measured with a point-of-care test, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. In this exclusively Korean cohort, the median OPR was 236 P2Y12 reactivity units. Using the definition of OPR ≥235 P2Y12 reactivity units as high OPR (HOPR), 50.3% of the cohort showed HOPR. The group with HOPR had significantly higher rates of cardiac death and spontaneous MI (2.5% vs 0.5%, p = 0.022) than the group without HOPR. Multivariate-adjusted analysis showed that HOPR was an independent predictor of the composite of cardiac death and nonfatal MI. The difference in major adverse cardiac events between the groups with and without HOPR was more profound in those without major cardiovascular disease, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia. In conclusion, HOPR to clopidogrel was significantly associated with cardiac death and spontaneous MI after elective PCI, suggesting that clopidogrel response variability may be a significant risk factor of hard end points in Koreans.     

A double-blind, randomized study on platelet aggregation in patients treated with a daily dose of 150 or 75 mg of clopidogrel for 30 days.

AIMS: We sought to test whether an increase in the clopidogrel maintenance dose results in increased inhibition of platelet aggregation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients after pre-treatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel and within 12 h after successful PCI were included in this trial. They were allocated to receive one of two clopidogrel daily maintenance doses (75 or 150 mg) for 30 days in a double-blind randomized manner. Platelet function was evaluated 30 days after the intervention with optical aggregometry and with a new point-of-care test (VerifyNowtrade mark P2Y12 assay). Maximal 5 microM ADP-induced platelet aggregation 30 days after PCI in the group treated with 150 mg/day clopidogrel (45.1 +/- 20.9%) was significantly lower than in the group treated with 75 mg/day (65.3 +/- 12.1%; P < 0.001). The VerifyNowtrade mark P2Y12 assay also indicated a higher degree of platelet function inhibition in the group treated with 150 mg/day (60.0 +/- 72.0 P2Y12 Reaction Units) than in the group treated with 75 mg/day (117.0 +/- 64.3 P2Y12 Reaction Units; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Administration of a 150 mg oral maintenance dose of clopidogrel results in more intense inhibition of platelet aggregation than administration of the currently recommended 75 mg maintenance dose.     

Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether platelet reactivity on clopidogrel therapy, as measured by a point-of-care platelet function assay, is associated with thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Platelet reactivity on clopidogrel (post-treatment reactivity) was measured with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in 380 patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to derive the optimal cut-off value for post-treatment reactivity in predicting 6 month out-of-hospital cardiovascular (CV) death, non-fatal MI, or stent thrombosis. The mean post-treatment reactivity was 184 +/- 85 PRU (P2Y12 reaction units). The optimal cut-off for the combined endpoint was a post-treatment reactivity > or =235 PRU [area under the curve 0.711 (95% confidence interval 0.529-0.893), P = 0.03], which was similar to the threshold of the upper tertile (231 PRU). Patients with post-treatment reactivity greater than the cut-off value had significantly higher rates of CV death (2.8 vs. 0%, P = 0.04), stent thrombosis (4.6 vs. 0%, P = 0.004), and the combined endpoint (6.5 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: High post-treatment platelet reactivity measured with a point-of-care platelet function assay is associated with post-discharge events after PCI with DES, including stent thrombosis. Investigation of alternative clopidogrel dosing regimens to reduce ischaemic events in high-risk patients identified by this assay is warranted.     

Usefulness of platelet response to clopidogrel by point-of-care testing to predict bleeding outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Antiplatelet Therapy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bleeding Study)

Platelet reactivity predicts ischemic outcomes in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but the correlation of heightened platelet response with bleeding has not been characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether low platelet reactivity by point-of-care measurement after clopidogrel administration correlates with bleeding complications of PCI. A total of 310 patients receiving clopidogrel before PCI were prospectively enrolled. Platelet reactivity was measured with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The primary end point was the 30-day incidence of major bleeding or entry-site complications according to quartile distribution of P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with preprocedural PRU levels in the lowest quartile compared to those in the highest quartile (10.1% vs 1.3%, p = 0.043), due mainly to entry-site hemorrhages. Absolute PRU levels were lower in patients with major bleeding (171 ± 49 vs 227 ± 68 in patients without, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, pre-PCI PRU levels in the first quartile were associated with a 4.5-fold increased risk for major bleeding (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 25.9, p = 0.01). By receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for the primary end point was a pre-PCI PRU value ≤ 189 (area under the curve 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.87, p = 0.001). In conclusion, this study suggests that an enhanced response to clopidogrel may be associated with higher risk for early major bleeding or entry-site complications in patients who undergo PCI. Point-of-care monitoring of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration may help identify patients in whom individualized strategies are indicated to limit bleeding complications after coronary intervention.     

Predictors of High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Early After Clopidogrel Loading in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background:?Given that platelet inhibition is crucial when ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergo primary PCI (PPCI), the identification of factors associated with early high on-treatment platelet reactivity may be important. Methods and Results:?Consecutive STEMI patients admitted for PPCI were considered for platelet reactivity assessment 2h after loading with 600mg clopidogrel using the VerifyNow point-of-care P2Y12 assay. A cut-off of ≥235 P2Y12 reaction units indicated high on-treatment platelet reactivity. Out of 92 STEMI patients, 63 (68.5%) were found to have high on-treatment platelet reactivity. Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity had received upstream clopidogrel loading and pantoprazol more frequently, had lower admission hemoglobin and tended to have an impaired renal function compared to those with an adequate response to clopidogrel. On multivariate analysis, upstream clopidogrel loading and creatinine clearance <60ml/min were independently associated with higher risk for high on-treatment platelet reactivity (relative risk [RR]=1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.17, P=0.01; RR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.008-1.71, P=0.04, respectively). Conclusions:?In patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, use of upstream clopidogrel and impaired renal function independently predict high on-treatment platelet reactivity assessed as early as 2h following 600mg of clopidogrel loading dose on point-of-care P2Y12 function assay. (Circ J?2012; 76: 2183-2187).     

阿司匹林或氯吡格雷作用下血小板不同活化途径的反应特点

目的探讨阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抑制血小板环氧酶(COX)-1途径和P2Y12受体活化的特点及两途径之间的交互关系。方法 20例健康男性志愿者按随机数余数分组法平均分为两组,分别服用阿司匹林(100 mg/d)和氯吡格雷(75 mg/d)连续7 d。并在服药和停药后第1、3、5、7天分别应用血栓弹力图、血小板功能分析仪和流式细胞仪观察血小板的抑制情况。结果服药后,氯吡格雷组的胶原-肾上腺素激活的闭孔时间(CEPI-CT)和胶原-腺苷二磷酸闭孔时间(CADP-CT)的变化差异均有统计学意义(F=27.2,P<0.01,F=25.3,P<0.05),阿司匹林组CEPI-CT迅速增至检测上限300 s,差异有统计学意义(F=36.7,P<0.01),而CADP-CT变化差异无统计学意义(F=2.12,P=0.13)。服药后阿司匹林组血小板COX-1途径抑制率增高至91.7%±0.9%(F=35.1,P<0.01),氯吡格雷组P2Y12受体抑制率由47.8%±3.1%增高至81.3%±3.8%(F=24.8,P<0.01),COX-1未受到有效抑制(F=1.85,P=0.11)。服药后两组CD62p表达降低50%(氯吡格雷组:F=28.7,P<0.01;阿司匹林组:F=20.7,P=0.02)。结论花生四烯酸诱导的COX-1途径活化与P2Y12受体活化可能存在交互作用,床旁即时检验有助于快速了解血小板功能状态,为监测有效的联合用药提供依据。     

Relationship between peripheral arterial reactive hyperemia and residual platelet reactivity after 600?mg clopidogrel

Clopidogrel reduces long-term ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable angina (SA) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Endothelial function improvement has been proposed, among other factors, for this beneficial effect of clopidogrel, but whether this might be associated to its anti-platelet action remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that clopidogrel improvement of peripheral vascular endothelial function might be associated with inhibition of platelet aggregation. Endothelial function was evaluated before and at least 12?h after 600?mg clopidogrel in 43 SA pts undergoing elective PCI by: (a) reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (measuring the Endoscore); (b) circulating endothelial microparticles (EMPs). Response to clopidogrel was measured with point-of-care VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and expressed as platelet reaction unit (PRU) and percent platelet inhibition (%PI). High platelet reactivity after clopidogrel was defined as PRU?≥?240. Endothelial function improved after clopidogrel in 20 pts. Changes in Endoscore (Δ Endoscore) were significantly correlated with both PRU (r?=?-0.61, P?相似文献   

Efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy with and without concomitant anticoagulation during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (the REMOVE trial)

Adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition decreases ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but is associated with increased bleeding. We hypothesized that maximal antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, a thienopyridine, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor without unfractionated heparin (UFH) would result in fewer bleeding complications and maintain efficacy in elective PCI. A total of 159 patients undergoing elective PCI were randomized to intraprocedural eptifibatide alone or eptifibatide plus UFH. Patients received aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg before the procedure. The primary end point was the Landefeld bleeding index. Secondary end points included the composite clinical outcome of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding, and a composite bleeding outcome of major, minor, and nuisance bleeding. The Landefeld bleeding index was significantly lower in the eptifibatide-only group compared with the eptifibatide-plus-UFH group (3.0 vs 3.9, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the composite clinical end point between groups (eptifibatide only 17% vs eptifibatide plus UFH 15%, p = 0.7). There was a trend toward a decrease in the composite bleeding end point in the eptifibatide-only compared with the eptifibatide-plus-UFH group (43% vs 56%, p = 0.10). In conclusion, during elective PCI, a strategy of aggressive antiplatelet therapy using aspirin, clopidogrel, and eptifibatide without anticoagulant therapy appears to decrease bleeding complications.     

Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the relation of high ex vivo platelet reactivity, rapid fibrin generation, and high thrombin-induced clot strength to postdischarge ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: High platelet reactivity and rapid fibrin generation may affect the incidence of ischemic events after PCI. However, limited data is available to link these ex vivo markers to the occurrence of events. METHODS: We measured platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) in patients undergoing PCI (n = 192). Clot strength, a measure of thrombin-induced fibrin and platelet interactions, and the time to initial fibrin generation, a marker of thrombin activity, were measured by thrombelastography. The relation of these measurements to ischemic event occurrence was prospectively examined over six months. RESULTS: A total of 100% and 84% of patients were on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, respectively, at the time of the initial event. Posttreatment ADP-induced aggregation by LTA (63 +/- 12% vs. 56 +/- 15%, p = 0.02) and clot strength (MA) were higher (74 +/- 5 mm vs. 65 +/- 4 mm, p < 0.001) and time to initial fibrin generation was shorter (4.3 +/- 1.3 min vs. 5.9 +/- 1.5 min, p < 0.001) in patients with events (n = 38). The event rates in the highest quartiles of LTA and MA were 32% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High platelet reactivity and clot strength, and rapid fibrin formation are novel risk factors for ischemic events after PCI. Clot strength is more predictive than ADP-induced platelet aggregation and may explain the occurrence of events despite treatment with cyclooxygenase-1 and P2Y12 inhibitors.     

Effect of additional temporary glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition on troponin release in elective percutaneous coronary interventions after pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel (TOPSTAR trial)

OBJECTIVES: The Troponin in Planned PTCA/Stent Implantation With or Without Administration of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Tirofiban (TOPSTAR) trial investigated: 1) the amount of troponin T (TnT) release after nonacute, elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel; and 2) the effect of additional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibiton on postinterventional TnT release. BACKGROUND: No data are available yet as to whether additional administration of a GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist might be beneficial in patients undergoing elective PCI already pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel. METHODS: After bolus application of the study medication (tirofiban [T] or placebo [P]), PCI was performed followed by an 18-h continuous infusion of T/P. Primary end point of the study was incidence and amount of TnT release after elective PCI after 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 12 h after PCI troponin release was detected in 63% of the patients receiving P and in 40% of the patients receiving T (p < 0.05), after 24 h in 69% (P) and 48% (T) (p < 0.05) and after 48 h in 74% (P) versus 58% (T) (p < 0.08) of the patients. No differences were observed regarding major bleeding, intracranial bleeding or nonhemorrhagic strokes. After nine months a reduction of combined death/myocardial infarction/target vessel revascularization could be observed in the tirofiban group ([T] 2.3% vs. [P] 13.04%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Troponin T release occurs after successful intervention in 74% of the patients undergoing elective PCI after 48 h even after pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist tirofiban is able to decrease the incidence of troponin release significantly in this patient population.     

Clopidogrel response up to six months after acute myocardial infarction

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite clopidogrel therapy is associated with adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Most studies to date have assessed clopidogrel response at a single time point before or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unclear, however, whether the HTPR phenotype is stable over time. Therefore, we aimed to examine response to clopidogrel in patients with AMI treated with PCI over a 6-month period. Patients (n = 57) with AMI treated with PCI were assessed for response to clopidogrel at 3 time points: in hospital, 30 days, and 6 months after index hospitalization. Response to clopidogrel was determined by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (reported as P2Y12 response units) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA; reported as aggregation units). HTPR was defined as ≥235 P2Y12 response units or ≥47 aggregation units. Patients' mean age was 54.5 ± 10.9 years, 91% were men, 19% had diabetes, and 74% were admitted with ST-segment elevation MI. HTPR based on MEA was observed in 22.8% of patients in hospital, 26.3% at 30 days, and 17.5% at 6 months (p = NS). HTPR based on the VerifyNow assay was observed in 38.6% of patients in hospital, 28.1% at 30 days, and 33.3% at 6 months (p = NS). Individual HTPR phenotypic assignment at baseline was stable in 73.7% (based on MEA) and 70.2% (based on VerifyNow) of patients at 6-month follow-up. In conclusion, this is the first study evaluating the stability of clopidogrel response over time after AMI. Rates of HTPR to clopidogrel therapy appear to be relatively stable up to 6 months after AMI.     

Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the role of dual drug resistance.

We evaluated the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing elective coronary stenting. Patients (n = 150) treated with aspirin but not clopidogrel had blood samples drawn at baseline and 24 h after clopidogrel loading. Depending on the definition used, 9% to 15% were resistant to aspirin and 24% to clopidogrel. About half of the aspirin-resistant patients were also resistant to clopidogrel. As a group, aspirin-resistant patients had lower response to clopidogrel (assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers) than aspirin-sensitive patients. Both aspirin- and clopidogrel-resistant patients had higher incidence of creatine kinase-MB elevation than the respective sensitive patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Wide variability has been reported in response to aspirin and clopidogrel. There are limited data on the simultaneous responses to both drugs. METHODS: Elective PCI patients (n = 150) who received aspirin for > or = 1 week but not clopidogrel were included. All patients received bivalirudin during PCI. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20 to 24 h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin resistance was defined by > or = 2 of 3 criteria: rapid platelet function analyzer-ASA score > or = 550, 5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation > or = 70%, and 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or = 20%. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or = 10% in response to 5 and 20 micromol/l ADP. RESULTS: Nineteen (12.7%) patients were resistant to aspirin and 36 (24%) to clopidogrel. Nine (47.4%) of the aspirin-resistant patients were also clopidogrel resistant. Aspirin-resistant patients were more likely to be women and have diabetes than were aspirin-sensitive patients. They also had lower response to clopidogrel, assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers (flow cytometry-determined PAC-1 binding and P-selectin expression). Elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band after stenting occurred more frequently in aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients (38.9% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.04) and in clopidogrel-resistant versus clopidogrel-sensitive patients (32.4% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-resistant patients as a group have reduced response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, we have identified a unique group of dual drug-resistant patients who may be at increased risk for thrombotic complications after PCI.     

Inter-individual variability in response to clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel, especially when combined with aspirin, reduces the rate of ischaemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). There are scare data in literature on the inter-individual variability in response to clopidogrel. AIM: To assess the incidence of clopidogrel resistance using rapid whole blood platelet function assessment, and to examine the possibility of early identification of non-responders. METHODS: In 31 consecutive patients with stable angina treated with aspirin, the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition (DPAI) in the whole blood was assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 12 as well as 24 hours after administration of loading dose of clopidogrel (300 mg). Response to clopidogrel was measured by calculating the absolute difference between the baseline DPAI and DPAI obtained at the investigated time-points (DPAI). RESULTS: After 24 hours from clopidogrel administration, seven (22.6%) patients were identified as non-responders (DPAI < or =10%). Demographic and clinical variables as well as baseline DPAI were similar in responders and non-responders (DPAI: 5.8+/-3.7% vs 7.1+/-5.3%, p=NS). Out of the patients who were found to be resistant to clopidogrel at the six-hour time-point, 87.5% remained resistant to this agent 24 hours after drug administration. DPAI calculated at the 24-hour time-point highly correlated with the six-hour DPAI (r=0.74). No differences in the rate of ischaemic or bleeding complications between responders and non-responders were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition allows early (six hours from the initiation of treatment) identification of patients who are resistant to clopidogrel. The method of the rapid whole blood platelet function assessment is feasible in every-day clinical practice.     

Safety and efficacy of short-term celecoxib before elective percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina pectoris

Fifty patients with stable angina pectoris entered a randomized, double-blind study and were assigned to receive celecoxib (200 mg 2 times daily) or placebo 7 days before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results showed that detection of markers of myocardial injury above the upper normal limit was significantly lower in the celecoxib than in the placebo group: 12% versus 35% for creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB; p = 0.001), 20% versus 48% for troponin I (p = 0.0004), and 22% versus 51% for myoglobin (p = 0.0005). Myocardial infarction by CK-MB determination was less commonly seen after PCI in the celecoxib than in the placebo group (5% vs 18%, p = 0.025). Postprocedural peak levels of CK-MB (2.9 +/- 18 vs 7.5 +/- 18 ng/ml, p = 0.0002) were also significantly lower in the celecoxib than in the placebo group. No significant side effect was reported by the 2 groups of patients. In conclusion, pretreatment with celecoxib 200 mg 2 times daily for 7 days significantly decreased procedural myocardial injury in elective PCI. These findings indicate that the antiphlogistic action of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition may provide a friendly protection to ischemic cardiomyocytes.     

Impact of anemia on platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting

High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) on clopidogrel is a predictor of recurrent ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Significant intraindividual variability in platelet aggregation on repeat testing has been reported. To understand factors contributing to the variability in platelet aggregation testing, we examined clinical and laboratory elements linked to HRPR in 255 consecutive patients tested ≥12 hours after PCI using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate 5 μmol/L and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VNP2Y12; Accumetrics). HRPR was defined as >46% residual aggregation for LTA and >236 P2Y12 response units (PRUs) for VNP2Y12. On multivariate analysis the only variable independently associated with HRPR with both LTA and VNP2Y12 was laboratory-defined anemia. Prevalences of HRPR by LTA were 34.3% in anemic patients, 15.6% in patients with normal hemoglobin levels, and 59.8% versus 25.9% by VNP2Y12 (p <0.005 for the 2 comparisons). In a subgroup of 50 patients, testing was done before and after the clopidogrel loading dose. At baseline there were no differences in platelet aggregation with either assay; however, absolute decrease in reactivity after the clopidogrel load was significantly less in anemic patients compared to patients with normal hemoglobin (change in residual aggregation by LTA 15.8 ± 5.8% vs 28.8 ± 3.2%, p <0.05; change in PRU by VNP2Y12 56.5 ± 35.5 vs 145.0 ± 14.2 PRUs, p <0.05, respectively). In conclusion, anemia is an important contributor to apparent HRPR on clopidogrel and may explain some of the intraindividual variability of platelet aggregation testing.     

Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor and clopidogrel: the platelet function substudy from the cangrelor versus standard therapy to achieve optimal management of platelet inhibition (CHAMPION) trials

Cangrelor is an intravenous antagonist of the P2Y(12) receptor characterized by rapid, potent, predictable, and reversible platelet inhibition. However, cangrelor was not superior to clopidogrel in reducing the incidence of ischemic events in the cangrelor versus standard therapy to achieve optimal management of platelet inhibition (CHAMPION) trials. A prospectively designed platelet function substudy was performed in a selected cohort of patients to provide insight into the pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor, particularly in regard to whether cangrelor therapy may interfere with the inhibitory effects of clopidogrel. This pre-defined substudy was conducted in a subset of patients from the CHAMPION-PCI trial (n = 230) comparing cangrelor with 600 mg of clopidogrel administered before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and from the CHAMPION-PLATFORM trial (n = 4) comparing cangrelor at the time of PCI and 600 mg clopidogrel given after the PCI. Pharmacodynamic measures included P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 testing (primary endpoint marker), platelet aggregation by light transmittance aggregometry following 5 and 20 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate stimuli, and markers of platelet activation determined by flow cytometry. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved <20 % change in PRU between baseline and >10 h after PCI. The main trial was stopped early limiting enrollment in the platelet substudy. A total of 167 patients had valid pharmacodynamic assessments for the primary endpoint. The percent of individuals achieving <20 % change in PRU between baseline and >10 h after PCI was higher with cangrelor + clopidogrel (32/84, 38.1 %) compared with placebo + clopidogrel (21/83, 25.3 %), but this was not statistically significant (difference:12.79 %, 95 % CI: -1.18 %, 26.77 %;p = 0.076). All pharmacodynamic markers as well as the prevalence of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity were significantly lower in patients treated with cangrelor. A rapid platelet inhibitory effect was achieved during cangrelor infusion and a rapid offset of action after treatment discontinuation. This CHAMPION platelet function substudy represents the largest pharmacodynamic experience with cangrelor, demonstrating its potent P2Y(12) receptor inhibitory effects, and rapid onset/offset of action. Although there was no significant pharmacodynamic interaction when transitioning to clopidogrel therapy, further studies are warranted given that enrollment in this study was limited due to premature interruption of the main trial.