A clinical study of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt combined with stomach and esopha-geal variceal embolization for gastric varices bleeding

<正>Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS)combined with stomach and esophageal variceal embolization(SEVE)for gastric variceal haemorrhage,and the efficacy with or without a gastrorenal shunt.Methods A total of 52 patients with gastric variceal bleeding history     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) modification in the management of post-TIPSS refractory hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND: Post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) hepatic encephalopathy (HE) can occur in up to one third of patients. In 5%, this can be refractory to optimal medical treatment and may require shunt modification. The efficacy of shunt modification has been poorly studied. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of and natural history following TIPSS modification for treatment of refractory HE. METHODS: From a dedicated database, we selected and further studied patients who had TIPSS modification for refractory HE. RESULTS: Over a 14 year period, of 733 TIPSS insertions, 211(29%) patients developed HE post-TIPSS. In 38 patients, shunt modification (reduction (n = 9) and occlusion (n = 29)) was performed for refractory HE. Indications for TIPSS were: variceal bleeding (n = 32), refractory ascites (n = 5), and other (n = 1). Child's grades A, B, and C were noted in 11%, 47%, and 42% of cases, respectively. HE improved in 58% of patients and remained unchanged or worsened in 42%, with similar results for occlusions and reductions. Following shunt modification, variceal bleeding recurred in three patients and ascites in three. Twenty five patients have died (liver related in 15) at a median duration of 10.2 months. Three patients died due to procedure related complications following shunt occlusions (mesenteric infarction (n = 2) and septicaemia (n = 1)). Median survival of patients whose HE did not improve following shunt modification was 79 days compared with 278 days in patients whose did (p<0.05). No variables independently predicted response to shunt modification. CONCLUSIONS: TIPSS modification is a useful option for patients with refractory HE following TIPSS insertion. Due to the significant risk of iatrogenic complications with shunt occlusions, shunt reduction is a safer and preferred option.     

The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional radiology technique that has shown a 90% success rate to decompress the portal circulation. As a non-surgical intervention, without requirement for anesthesia and very low procedure-related mortality, TIPS is applicable to severe cirrhotic patients, who are otherwise untreatable, for example, nonsurgical candidates. TIPS constitutes the most frequently employed tool to achieve portosystemic shunting. TIPS acts by lowering portal pressure, which is the main underlying pathophysiologic determinant of the major complications of cirrhosis. Regarding esophagogastric variceal bleeding, TIPS has excellent hemostatic effect (95%) with low rebleeding rate (<20%). TIPS is an accepted rescue therapy for first line treatment failures in 2 settings (1) acute variceal bleeding and (2) secondary prophylaxis. In addition, TIPS offers 70% to 90% hemostasis to patients presenting with recurrent active variceal bleeding. TIPS is more effective than standard therapy for patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient >20mm Hg. TIPS is particularly useful to treat bleeding from varices inaccessible to endoscopy. TIPS should not be applied for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Portosystemic encephalopathy and stent dysfunction are TIPS major drawbacks. The weakness of the TIPS procedure is the frequent need for endovascular reintervention to ensure stent patency. The circulatory effects of TIPS are an attractive approach for the treatment of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome, yet TIPS is not considered first line therapy for refractory ascites owing to unacceptable incidence of portosystemic encephalopathy. Pre-TIPS evaluation taking into account predictors of outcome is mandatory. The improved results achieved with covered-stents might expand the currently accepted recommendations for TIPS use.     

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗门静脉高压症

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一项专门治疗门静脉高压症的介入治疗新技术.该技术于1969年首先报道,经过30多年的探索与发展,已日臻成熟,现已被广泛用于伴有食管胃底静脉曲张出血,顽固性腹水、Budd-Chiari综合征(BCS)等的门静脉高压症的治疗,并取得了显著疗效.     

经肝段下腔静脉建立门体分流道的临床效果

传统的经颈内静脉穿刺门体分流术(TIPS)分流道是建立在肝静脉与门静脉分支之间的肝实质内，经过十年临床实践发现，在术中经肝静脉向门静脉穿刺不但常受肝尾叶肿瘤、肝静脉闭塞及肝静脉与门静脉之间的解剖关系的制约，而且术后的再狭窄常发生于支架肝静脉端，均与选择肝静脉有关。本研究探讨了经肝段下腔静脉直接穿刺门静脉建立TIPS分流道的安全性和可行性。     

The use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt in the management of acute oesophageal variceal haemorrhage

Variceal haemorrhage is a common and serious complication of portal hypertension. Endoscopic therapy is successful in the majority in controlling bleeding but in those who continue to bleed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt is highly effective in achieving haemostasis, although the evidence base that this is associated with improved survival is limited. This review discusses initial management and then the particular role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt. A management algorithm is proposed. The timing of intervention is emphasized and the importance of admission to specialized centres. Regional protocols are probably essential for the latter to be organized effectively.     

Esophageal varices. II. TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) and surgical therapy

The role of surgery in the prevention and treatment of variceal hemorrhage is reviewed. Types of available surgery, their physiologic basis, and literature supporting their use are discussed in the context of the natural history of variceal hemorrhage. The evolution of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a treatment modality for variceal hemorrhage is reviewed. The effects of TIPS on portal and systemic hemodynamics and clinical usefulness in the management of variceal hemorrhage are discussed. A treatment algorithm for the integrated use of the various treatments is provided.     

Longterm follow up of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) for the treatment of portal hypertension: results in 130 patients.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunts (TIPSS) are increasingly being used to manage the complications of portal hypertension. This study reports on the follow up on 130 patients who have undergone TIPSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients (81 male), mean (SD) age 54.7 (12.5) years underwent TIPSS. The majority (64.6%) had alcoholic cirrhosis and 53.2% had Childs C disease. Indications were: variceal haemorrhage (76.2%), refractory ascites (13.1%), portal hypertensive gastropathy (4.6%), others (6.1%). Shunt function was assessed by Doppler ultrasonography and two then six monthly portography and mean follow up for survivors was 18.0 months (range 2-43.5). RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 119 (91.5%). Sixty three episodes of shunt dysfunction were observed in 45 (37.8%) patients. Variceal rebleeding occurred in 16 (13.4%) patients and was always associated with shunt dysfunction. Twenty (16.8%) patients had new or worse spontaneous encephalopathy after TIPSS and 11 (64.7%) patients had an improvement in resistant ascites. Thirty day mortality was 21.8% and one year survival 62.5%. CONCLUSION: TIPSS is an effective treatment for variceal bleeding, resistant ascites, and portal hypertensive gastropathy. Rebleeding is invariably associated with shunt dysfunction, the frequency of which increases with time, therefore regular and longterm shunt surveillance is required.     

The role of the transjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt in the management of variceal bleeding

For patients who present with variceal bleeding refractory to endoscopic and pharmacologic methods, TIPS is a new and effective therapy. Stents are used in selected patients with decompensated liver disease and those who anticipate liver transplantation within 6 to 12 months. Surveillance of TIPS with ultrasound, with or without venography, is recommended to diagnose and treat stenosis or occlusion before variceal hemorrhage recurs. Hepatic encephalopathy may develop in a subset of patients, but it is usually well controlled with conservative measures. Child-Pugh and APACHE scores are predictive of patient survival after TIPS. Randomized controlled trials will be necessary to assess whether TIPS is useful, safe, and cost effective for the management of variceal bleeding in patients with end stage liver disease.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of refractory bleeding from ruptured gastric varices.

The optimal management of ruptured gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis has not been codified yet. The present study reports the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with refractory gastric variceal bleeding. Thirty-two consecutive patients were included. All had been unresponsive to vasoactive agents infusion, sclerotherapy, and/or tamponade and were considered poor surgical candidates. They were followed-up until death, transplantation, or at least 1 year (median: 509 days; range 4 to 2,230). Hemostasis was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients actively bleeding at the time of the procedure. In the whole sample of 32 patients, rebleeding rates were 14%, 26%, and 31%, respectively at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. De novo encephalopathy was observed in 5 (16%) patients. Seven patients experienced complications and consequently 4 of these patients died. TIPS primary patency rates were 84%, 74%, and 51%, respectively, at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. For the same periods of time, survival rates were 75%, 62%, and 59%. These results suggest that TIPS can be used in cirrhotic patients with refractory gastric variceal bleeding and are effective in achieving hemostasis as well as in preventing rebleeding.     

Cost-effectiveness of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl) glue injections versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding

The management of bleeding gastric varices has not been standardized. Although transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used in most centers, endoscopic treatment with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (cyanoacrylate) glue has recently been shown to be effective. Cost-effectiveness analyses of these methods are lacking. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with bleeding gastric varices treated either by TIPS or cyanoacrylate glue injection. Economic analysis was based on direct costs for a fixed financial year. The two groups were compared for a period of 6 months follow-up, to liver transplantation, or death for each patient. RESULTS: Between January, 1995 and December, 1999, 20 patients with bleeding gastric varices had TIPS; 23 patients had cyanoacrylate glue injection from January, 2000 to October, 2001. There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient characteristics, transfusion requirement, and gastric variceal anatomy. In the TIPS group, 15/20 patients had the procedure performed within 24 h of hemorrhage, and 90% of stent insertions were successful. Complications consisted of two cases of pulmonary edema, two cases of severe encephalopathy, and a 15% stenosis rate at 6 months. In the glue group, there were 3 +/- 1.5 endoscopies and 2 +/- 1 injections per patient, with a 96% initial hemostasis. There was one case of (glue) pulmonary embolism and one blocked front endoscope lens, which required repair. The initial rebleed rate was significantly lower in patients who had TIPS (15% vs 30%, p = 0.005). The inpatient stay was shorter in the glue group (13 +/- 1 vs 18 +/- 2 days, p = 0.05), but there was no difference in the overall mortality rate. The median cost within 6 months of initial gastric variceal bleeding was $4,138 US dollars ($3,009-$8,290 US dollars) for glue versus $11,906 US dollars ($8,200-$16,770 US dollars) for TIPS (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this comparable group of patients, cyanoacrylate glue injection was more cost effective than TIPS in the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding. A prospective, randomized trial would be required to confirm our analysis.     

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗食道静脉曲张破裂出血

采用经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPSS)治疗5例肝硬化门静脉高压症(CPH)食管静脉反复破裂出血病人,平均门静脉压力由术前3.6±0.7kPa,降至术后1.73±0.35kPa,术后24小时全部病例出血均停止,门静脉血流阻力系数降低,曲张静脉消失或减轻。TIPSS 治疗门脉高压食管静脉反复性出血具有损伤小、合并症少,近期疗效确切等特点,是治疗门脉高压食道静脉破裂出血的首选方法。     

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the management of cirrhotic refractory ascites

Cirrhotic ascites results from sinusoidal hypertension and sodium retention, which is secondary to a decreased effective arterial blood volume. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is currently indicated in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who require large-volume paracentesis (LVP) more than two or three times per month. TIPS placement is associated with normalization of sinusoidal pressure and a significant improvement in urinary sodium excretion that correlates with suppression of plasma renin activity, which is, itself, indicative of an improvement in effective arterial blood volume. Compared with serial LVP, placement of an uncovered TIPS stent is more effective at preventing ascites from recurring; however, increased incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and shunt dysfunction rates after TIPS placement are important issues that increase its cost. Although evidence suggests that TIPS placement might result in better patient survival, this needs to be confirmed, particularly in light of the development of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents. Favorable results apply to centers experienced in placing the TIPS, with the aim being to decrease the portosystemic gradient to <12 mmHg but >5 mmHg. This article reviews the pathophysiologic basis for the use of a TIPS in patients with refractory ascites, the results of controlled trials comparing TIPS placement (using uncovered stents) versus LVP, and a systematic review of predictors of death after TIPS placement for refractory ascites.     

The hematologic consequences of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are a recent innovation in the management of portal hypertension. In 1992, we had previously described an instance of severe hemolysis associated with this procedure. This study was undertaken to define and quantify the true incidence of TIPS-associated hemolysis and its clinical spectrum, as well as to test the hypothesis that portal decompression by TIPS would ameliorate hypersplenism in patients with portal hypertension. A total of 60 patients undergoing TIPS for prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage (n = 40) or refractory ascites (n = 20) were studied. Forty patients with cirrhosis who were followed concurrently served as controls. At entry, both groups were comparable with the exception of increased ascites in the TIPS group. A total of 7 instances of intravascular hemolysis were identified in 60 TIPS patients, whereas none occurred in controls. Of these, 4 patients were asymptomatic and detected on routine laboratory testing. Hemolysis led to a greater than 4-g/dL decrease in hemoglobin in 2 patients, 2- to 3-g/dL decrease in 2 others and a 3- to 4-gm/dL decrease in 1 patient. Two patients were able to compensate for hemolysis and did not develop anemia. In all but 1 case, the findings of hemolysis subsided by 12 to 15 weeks; in 1 patient, orthotopic liver transplantation was associated with resolution of the hemolysis. Overall, no significant changes in white blood cell or platelet counts were observed in patients undergoing TIPS despite adequate portal decompression. We conclude that TIPS-induced hemolysis occurs in approximately 10% of subjects. However, it is self-limited and rarely requires intervention. Potential mechanisms of such hemolysis are discussed. TIPS is also not recommended as a means of improving platelet counts in patients with severe hypersplenism. (Hepatology 1996 Jan;23(1):32-9)     

Effect of initial stent position on patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

AIM To evaluate the effect of initial stent position on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS).METHODS We studied 425 patients from January 2004 to January 2015 with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding who required TIPS placement. Patients were randomly divided into group A(stent in hepatic vein, n = 57), group B(stent extended to junction of hepatic vein and inferior vena cava, n = 136), group C(stent in left branch of portal vein, n = 83) and group D(stent in main portal vein, n = 149). Primary unassisted patency was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and incidence of recurrence of bleeding, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy(HE) were analyzed.RESULTS The mean primary unassisted patency rate in group B tended to be higher than in group A at 3, 6 and 12 mo(P = 0.001, 0.000 and 0.005), and in group D it tended to be lower than in group C at 3, 6 and 12 mo(P = 0.012, 0.000 and 0.028). The median shunt primary patency time for group A was shorter than for group B(5.2 mo vs 9.1 mo, 95%CI: 4.3-5.6, P = 0.013, logrank test), while for group C it was longer than for group D(8.3 mo vs 6.9 mo, 95%CI: 6.3-7.6, P = 0.025, log-rank test). Recurrence of bleeding and ascites in group A was higher than in group B at 3 mo(P = 0.014 and 0.020), 6 mo(P = 0.014 and 0.019) and 12 mo(P = 0.024 and 0.034. Recurrence in group D was higher than in group C at 3 mo(P = 0.035 and 0.035), 6 mo(P = 0.038 and 0.022) and 12 mo(P = 0.017 and 0.009). The incidence of HE was not significantly different among any of the groups(P = 0.965).CONCLUSION The initial stent position can markedly affect stent patency, which potentially influences the risk of recurrent symptoms associated with shunt stenosis or occlusion.