Effect of simultaneous administration of GHRH (1-40) and TRH on GH, PRL and TSH secretion in normal man

The GHRH test represents a new tool in the study of secretion in man. Nine normal fasting males received on separate occasions in random order 1) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0; 2) TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min; 3) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0 plus TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min. Blood samples were drawn for GH, PRL and TSH at -90, -60, -30, 0 min and then every 15 min for 2 h. GHRH significantly increased GH in all subjects. The same GH response was found during GHRH plus TRH test. No effect was found either on PRL and TSH secretion after GHRH administration, or on GH pattern after TRH administration. A significant decrease of TSH, but not of PRL response was observed after GHRH plus TRH administration in comparison to TRH alone. These results underline that the inhibitory effect exerted by TRH on GH secretion during some experimental conditions is not linked to a pituitary interference between GHRH and TRH. The difference in TSH secretion, following GHRH plus TRH in comparison with TRH alone, could be due to a GHRH-induced central inhibitory mechanism, probably GHRH-related.     

Arginine stimulates growth hormone secretion by suppressing endogenous somatostatin secretion

To determine how arginine (Arg) stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo and in vitro. Six normal men were studied on four occasions: 1) Arg-TRH, 30 g arginine were administered in 500 mL saline in 30 min, followed by an injection of 200 micrograms TRH; 2) GHRH-Arg-TRH, 100 micrograms GHRH-(1-44) were given iv as a bolus immediately before the Arg infusion, followed by 200 micrograms TRH, iv; 3) GHRH test, 100 micrograms GHRH were given as an iv bolus; and 4) TRH test, 200 micrograms TRH were given iv as a bolus dose. Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 30 min before and 120 min after the start of each infusion. Anterior pituitary cells from rats were coincubated with Arg (3, 6, 15, 30, and 60 mg/mL) and GHRH (0.05, 1, 5, and 10 nmol/L) for a period of 3 h. Rat GH was measured in the medium. After Arg-TRH the mean serum GH concentration increased significantly from 0.6 to 23.3 +/- 7.3 (+/- SE) micrograms/L at 60 min. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL significantly (maximum TSH, 11.1 +/- 1.8 mU/L; maximum PRL, 74.6 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L). After GHRH-Arg-TRH, the maximal serum GH level was significantly higher (72.7 +/- 13.4 micrograms/L) than that after Arg-TRH alone, whereas serum TSH and PRL increased to comparable levels (TSH, 10.2 +/- 3.0 mU/L; PRL, 64.4 +/- 13.6 micrograms/L). GHRH alone increased serum GH to 44.9 +/- 9.8 micrograms/L, significantly less than when GHRH, Arg, and TRH were given. TRH alone increased serum TSH to 6.6 +/- 0.6 mU/L, significantly less than the TSH response to Arg-TRH. The PRL increase after TRH only also was lower (47.2 +/- 6.8 micrograms/L) than the PRL response after Arg-TRH. In vitro Arg had no effect on basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion. Our results indicate that Arg administered with GHRH led to higher serum GH levels than did a maximally stimulatory dose of GHRH or Arg alone. The serum TSH response to Arg-TRH also was greater than that to TRH alone. We conclude that the stimulatory effects of Arg are mediated by suppression of endogenous somatostatin secretion.     

THE INTERACTION OF GROWTH HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE WITH OTHER HYPOTHALAMIC HORMONES ON THE RELEASE OF ANTERIOR PITUITARY HORMONES

To determine whether the 29 amino-acid fragment of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) can be combined with other hypothalamic releasing hormones in a single test of anterior pituitary reserve, the responses of anterior pituitary hormones to combinations of an i.v. bolus of GHRH(1-29)NH2 or saline with an i.v. bolus of either LH releasing hormone (LHRH) plus TRH, ovine CRH(oCRH) or saline were studied. Each infusion of GHRH(1-29)NH2 resulted in a rapid increment of the plasma GH value. Infusion of GHRH(1-29)NH2 also caused a small and transient rise in plasma PRL, but no change in the integrated PRL response. The combination of GHRH(1-29)NH2 with LHRH plus TRH caused a larger increment of peak and integrated plasma TSH levels than LHRH plus TRH alone. GHRH(1-29)NH2 did not affect the release of other anterior pituitary hormones after infusion with oCRH or LHRH plus TRH. Because of the finding of potentiation of the TSH-releasing activity of LHRH plus TRH by GHRH(1-29)NH2, the study was extended to the investigation of TSH release after infusion of TRH in combination with either GHRH(1-29)NH2 or GHRH(1-40). In this study the combination of TRH with both GHRH preparations also caused a larger increment of the peak and integrated plasma TSH levels than TRH alone. It is concluded that GHRH(1-29)NH2 possesses moderate PRL-releasing activity apart from GH-releasing activity. In addition, GHRH potentiates the TSH-releasing activity of TRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interaction of L-dopa and GHRH on GH secretion in normal men

To determine how L-dopa stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo. Six normal men were studied on 4 occasions: 1) L-dopa-TRH: 500 mg L-dopa orally followed by 200 micrograms TRH 60 min later; 2) L-dopa-GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH 1-44 iv 30 min after L-dopa followed by 200 micrograms TRH iv; 3) GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH iv at 0 min, 30 min later 200 micrograms TRH iv; 4) TRH test: 200 micrograms TRH iv as a bolus. After L-dopa-TRH GH-levels increased significantly from 0.6 micrograms/l to 25.8 +/- 9.6 (SE) micrograms/l at 60 min. Only a slight TSH and no PRL increase was observed after L-dopa-TRH. After L-dopa-GHRH-TRH the GH-increase was significantly higher (45.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/l) compared to L-dopa-TRH alone. GHRH-TRH increased GH-levels to 52.5 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, which was not significantly different from the GH-levels obtained when L-dopa-GHRH-TRH were given. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL to 6.3 +/- 0.7 microU/ml and 715 +/- 136 microU/ml, respectively, which was significantly higher compared to the TSH responses after L-dopa-TRH. The PRL and TSH increase after TRH only was also higher (TSH-max: 5.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; PRL-max: 899 +/- 154 microU/ml) compared to the TSH and PRL responses after L-dopa-TRH. Our results show that the combination of L-dopa with GHRH leads to the same GH response as GHRH only. However, both responses are significantly higher than the one after L-dopa alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of acute infusion of erythropoietin on paradoxical responses of growth hormone to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in acromegalic patients

OBJECTIVE: Our aim has been to evaluate the effects of i.v. infusion of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) on the responses of growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation in acromegalic patients. METHODS: We studied 16 patients (8 females, aged 29-68 years) with active acromegaly and 12 control subjects (7 females, 24-65 years). All participants were tested with TRH (400 microg i.v. as bolus) and with TRH plus rhEPO (40 U/kg at a constant infusion rate for 30 min, starting 15 min before TRH injection) on different days. Blood samples were obtained between -30 and 120 min for GH and PRL determinations, and between -30 and 90 min for TSH determinations. Hormone responses were studied by a time-averaged (area under the secretory curve (AUC)) and time-independent (peak values) analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients exhibited a paradoxical GH reaction after TRH administration with great interindividual variability in GH levels. When patients were stimulated with rhEPO plus TRH there were no changes in the variability of GH responses or in the peak and AUC for GH secretion. Infusion with rhEPO did not induce any significant change in GH secretion in normal subjects. Baseline and TRH-stimulated PRL concentrations in patients did not differ from those values found in controls. When TRH was injected during the rhEPO infusion, a significant (P<0.05) increase in PRL concentrations at 15-120 min was found in acromegalic patients. Accordingly, the PRL peak and the AUC for PRL secretion were significantly increased in patients. Infusion with rhEPO had no effect on TRH-induced PRL release in control subjects. Baseline TSH concentrations, as well as the TSH peak and the AUC after TRH, were significantly lower in patients than in controls. Infusion with rhEPO modified neither the peak TSH reached nor the AUC for TSH secretion after TRH injection in acromegalic patients and in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: Results in patients with acromegaly suggest that (i) the paradoxical GH response to TRH is not modified by rhEPO infusion, (ii) rhEPO has no effect on TRH-induced TSH release, and (iii) acute rhEPO administration increases the TRH-induced PRL release in acromegalic patients.     

Effects of repetitive administration of thyrotropin-releasing hormone at short intervals in acromegaly

We investigated the pattern of GH secretion in response to repetitive TRH administration in patients with active acromegaly and in normal subjects. Nine acromegalic patients and 10 normal subjects received three doses of 200 micrograms of TRH iv at 90-min intervals. There was a marked serum GH rise in acromegalic patients after each TRH dose (net incremental area under the curve [nAUC]: first dose = 4448 +/- 1635 micrograms.min.l-1; second dose = 3647 +/- 1645 micrograms.min.l-1; third dose = 4497 +/- 2416 micrograms.min.l-1; NS), though individual GH responses were very variable. In normal subjects TRH did not elicit GH secretion even after repeated stimulation. Each TRH administration stimulated PRL release in acromegalic patients, though the nAUC of PRL was significantly higher after the first (1260 +/- 249 micrograms.min.l-1) than after the second and the third TRH administration (478 +/- 195 and 615 +/- 117 micrograms.min.l-1, respectively; P less than 0.01). In normal subjects too, PRL secretion was lower after repeated stimulation (first dose = 1712 +/- 438 micrograms.min.l-1; second dose = 797 +/- 177 micrograms.min.l-1; third dose = 903 +/- 229 micrograms.min.l-1 P less than 0.01), though different kinetics of PRL secretion were evident, when compared with acromegalic patients. TSH secretion, assessed in only 4 patients, was stimulated after each TRH dose, though a minimal but significant reduction of nAUC of TSH after repeated TRH challenge occurred. Both T3 and T4 increased steadily in the 4 patients. The same pattern of TSH, T3, and T4 secretion occurred in normal subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 infusion synchronizes growth hormone, thyrotrophin and prolactin release in prolonged critical illness

OBJECTIVE: During prolonged critical illness, nocturnal pulsatile secretion of GH, TSH and prolactin (PRL) is uniformly reduced but remains responsive to the continuous infusion of GH secretagogues and TRH. Whether such (pertinent) secretagogues would synchronize pituitary secretion of GH, TSH and/or PRL is not known. DESIGN AND METHODS: We explored temporal coupling among GH, TSH and PRL release by calculating cross-correlation among GH, TSH and PRL serum concentration profiles in 86 time series obtained from prolonged critically ill patients by nocturnal blood sampling every 20 min for 9 h during 21-h infusions of either placebo (n=22), GHRH (1 microg/kg/h; n=10), GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2; 1 microg/kg/h; n=28), TRH (1 microg/kg/h; n=8) or combinations of these agonists (n=8). RESULTS: The normal synchrony among GH, TSH and PRL was absent during placebo delivery. Infusion of GHRP-2, but not GHRH or TRH, markedly synchronized serum profiles of GH, TSH and PRL (all P< or =0.007). After addition of GHRH and TRH to the infusion of GHRP-2, only the synchrony between GH and PRL was maintained (P=0.003 for GHRH + GHRP-2 and P=0.006 for TRH + GHRH + GHRP-2), and was more marked than with GHRP-2 infusion alone (P=0.0006 by ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS: The nocturnal GH, TSH and PRL secretory patterns during prolonged critical illness are herewith further characterized to include loss of synchrony among GH, TSH and PRL release. The synchronizing effect of an exogenous GHRP-2 drive, but not of GHRH or TRH, suggests that the presumed endogenous GHRP-like ligand may participate in the orchestration of coordinated anterior pituitary hormone release.     

Effect of the dopamine agonist, lergotrile mesylate, on circulating anterior pituitary hormones in man.

The effects of the ergoline derivative, lergotrile mesylate, on the serum levels of PRL, GH, TSH, LH, FSH, cortisol, and blood sugar were studied in six normal males. The effects of lergotrile mesylate on the serum levels of GH and PRL were also studied in eight patients with acromegaly and in two with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. In the normal subjects, 2 mg oral lergotrile lowered basal PRL levels after 90 min and markedly impaired the PRL response to TRH (200 micrograms iv); the mean peak value +/- SE was 8.3 +/- 1.1 micrograms/liter, compared to the control value of 66.6 /+- 11.3 micrograms/liter. Lergotrile raised serum GH levels in five of the six subjects to peaks of 8-49 micrograms/liter, compared to 2-8 micrograms/liter after placebo. In three subjects, the GH response to lergotrile was attenuated by the prior administration of the dopamine antagonist, metoclopramide (10 mg orally). Lergotrile had no effect on FSH and LH levels under basal conditions or after the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 micrograms iv). Circulating TSH levels were unaltered basally but impaired after TRH. Blood sugar levels were unaltered; serum cortisol was elevated in five of six subjects; there was a brief depression of diastolic blood pressure, but no change in pulse rate. The side effects after lergotrile were variable, with drowsiness as a consistent feature. These actions are similar to those of bromocriptine (an ergot derivative treatment of hyperprolactinemia and acromegaly, to suppress PRL and GH secretion, and in parkinsonism. Therefore, it may be expected that lergotrile could fulfill these clinical uses; however, in the studies comparing the effects of single oral doses of lergotrile (2 mg) and bromocriptine (2.5 mg) on GH and PRL secretion in patients with acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia, lergotrile in the dose used has been found to have an earlier onset and shorter duration of action.     

Effects of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine administration on basal and growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone secretion in elderly subjects

The basal and GH-releasing hormone-stimulated secretion of GH declines in the elderly. We tested the ability of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine, a drug used in the treatment of stroke and Parkinson's disease, to alter GH secretion in 11 healthy elderly volunteers, aged 69-84. Each subject received an iv infusion of 2 g of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine or normal saline. GHRH and TRH were also administered during cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine infusions. The infusion of cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine induced a 4-fold (p less than 0.05) increase in serum GH levels over basal values. A small increase in GH was seen after GHRH administration. However, the addition of GHRH to the cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine infusion resulted in a GH response which was significantly greater than that seen after GHRH alone; the integrated concentration of GH was more than 2-fold greater in the cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine treated group (706.85 +/- 185.1 vs 248.9 +/- 61.4 micrograms.l-1.(120 min)-1; p = 0.01). The PRL and TSH responses to TRH were not significantly affected by cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine infusion, indicating that dopaminergic mechanisms are not involved. These studies demonstrate that cytidine 5'-diphosphocholine can enhance basal and GHRH-stimulated GH release in the elderly, but the mechanism of action of the drug remains unclear.     

Acromegaly due to ectopic growth hormone-releasing hormone secretion by a bronchial carcinoid tumour. Dynamic hormonal responses to various stimuli.

Ectopic GHRH is a relatively uncommon cause of acromegaly, which should be differentiated from pituitary adenoma, in order to avoid damage to the pituitary gland from unnecessary interventions. We report here on a 66-year-old man with acromegaly due to a GHRH-secreting bronchial carcinoid tumour, who recovered completely following removal of the tumour. His hormonal status was studied before and after the operation. Basal GH, GHRH, IGF-I and PRL levels, as well as plasma GH response to glucose load and TRH administration were abnormal before the operation, and became normal thereafter. The somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 was found to be a potent inhibitor of the ectopic GHRH and the GH secretion (greater than 500 to 42 ng/l and 15.4 micrograms/l to 0.8 microgram/l, respectively). The effect on GHRH proved to be due to direct effect of somatostatin on the tumour cells, as demonstrated in tissue culture studies. A mixed meal was found immediately to suppress GHRH levels without such an effect on GH secretion. We conclude that the neuroendocrine tests usually practised in acromegaly cannot differentiate between ectopic GHRH secretion and pituitary adenoma. High plasma GHRH levels may serve as a diagnostic test for excessive GHRH production, which is almost always ectopic. These high levels are suppressible by somatostatin and a mixed meal.     

A possible direct precursor of thyrotropin-releasing hormone, pGlu-His-Pro-Gly, stimulates prolactin secretion in anorexia nervosa

TRH is produced from its possible direct precursor, pGlu-His-Pro-Gly (TRH-Gly), by alpha-amidating enzyme. The quantitative response of TRH-Gly-stimulated PRL, TSH, and GH was evaluated in nine patients with anorexia nervosa, six age-matched normal women, eight patients with uremia, five patients with acromegaly, and two patients with prolactinoma. Intravenous injection (500 micrograms) of TRH-Gly caused a 2.6-fold increase in PRL secretion in patients with anorexia nervosa (basal level, 10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 25.9 +/- 2.5 micrograms/L 15 min after injection; P less than 0.01). In contrast, no significant change was observed in TRH-Gly-stimulated PRL secretion in normal women (basal level, 13.5 +/- 2.3 vs. 15.3 +/- 2.5 micrograms/L 15 min after injection; P greater than 0.05). TRH-Gly did not alter PRL levels in patients with uremia, acromegaly, or prolactinoma. Secretion of TSH, but not GH, was slightly increased by TRH-Gly injection in patients with anorexia nervosa (basal level, 1.41 +/- 0.13 vs. 2.86 +/- 0.22 min/L 30 min after injection; P less than 0.01), whereas no significant secretory response was observed in normal women. These data provide evidence that PRL secretion in anorectic patients is quantitatively different from that in normal persons.     

GH FEEDBACK OCCURS THROUGH MODULATION OF HYPOTHALAMIC SOMATOSTATIN UNDER CHOLINERGIC CONTROL: STUDIES WITH PYRIDOSTIGMINE AND GHRH

We have studied the effect of increased cholinergic tone on the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and on GH feedback, using pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. In six healthy male adult volunteers 120 mg oral pyridostigmine increased basal GH secretion compared to placebo and augmented the GH response to 100 micrograms i.v. GHRH (1-29) NH2; the effect was more than the additive effect of pyridostigmine and GHRH when each was given alone. Pretreatment with 2 IU methionyl-hGH given i.v. abolished the serum GH response to GHRH given 3 h later, demonstrating a negative feedback loop of GH on the response to GHRH; this inhibited response to GHRH was restored in subjects given pyridostigmine as well as methionyl-hGH. The data demonstrate that enhanced cholinergic tone releases GH, augments the serum GH response to GHRH and unblocks the negative feedback effect of methionyl-hGH pretreatment on the GH response to GHRH. These results suggest that GH negative feedback effects on its own secretion occur predominantly through increased hypothalamic somatostatin secretion; this somatostatin secretion is under inhibitory cholinergic control.     

Effects of hypophysiotropic factors on growth hormone and prolactin secretion from somatotroph adenomas in culture

In an attempt to characterize GH and PRL secretion in acromegaly, the effects of various stimuli on GH and PRL release by cultured pituitary adenoma cells derived from acromegalic patients were studied. In addition, the PRL responses of somatotroph adenoma cells were compared to those of prolactinoma cells. GH-releasing hormone-(1-44) (GHRH) consistently stimulated GH secretion in all 14 somatotroph adenomas studied in a dose-dependent manner. The sensitivity as well as the magnitude of the GH responses to GHRH were highly variable in individual tissues. Somatotroph adenomas that did not respond to dopamine were more sensitive and had greater GH responses to GHRH. In 8 of 9 somatotroph adenomas that concomitantly secreted PRL, the addition of GHRH likewise increased PRL release. Omission of extracellular Ca2+ blocked the stimulatory effect of GHRH on GH and PRL secretion. When cells were coincubated with 0.1 nM somatostatin, GH and PRL secretion induced by 10 nM GHRH were completely blocked in most adenomas. Similarly, coincubation of dopamine resulted in inhibition of GHRH-induced hormone secretion in some adenomas. Addition of TRH to the incubation medium, on the other hand, significantly stimulated GH secretion in 8 of 14 adenomas, while TRH stimulated PRL release in all of the adenomas. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) produced an increase in GH and PRL secretion in other adenomas. In prolactinoma cells, somatostatin and dopamine unequivocally suppressed PRL secretion; however, other stimuli including GHRH, VIP, and CRF were ineffective. TRH induced a significant increase in PRL secretion in only one prolactinoma. These results suggest that responsiveness to GHRH and somatostatin is preserved in somatotroph adenomas; the responsiveness to GHRH is inversely correlated to that to dopamine; and PRL cells associated with somatotroph adenomas possess characteristics similar to those of GH cells. Further, the GH stimulatory actions of TRH and VIP are different.     

EFFECT OF SUBACUTE CABERGOLINE TREATMENT ON PROLACTIN, THYROID STIMULATING HORMONE AND GROWTH HORMONE RESPONSE TO SIMULTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF THYROTROPHIN-RELEASING HORMONE AND GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE IN HYPERPROLACTINAEMIC WOMEN

It is known that dopaminergic neurotransmission is involved in the control of PRL, TSH and GH secretion. Cabergoline (CAB) is a new ergolinic derivative with a long-acting dopaminergic activity. We evaluated 11 women with pathological hyperprolactinaemia before and during sub-acute CAB treatment (0.8-1.2 mg/p.o.; 8 weeks). Simultaneous administration of TRH (200 micrograms i.v.) and GHRH 1-44 (50 micrograms i.v.) were carried out before and after 4, 8 and 10 week intervals from the beginning of CAB treatment. Basal PRL levels (2453.5 +/- S.E. 444.5 mU/l) were significantly reduced during CAB administration (week 4: 164.5 +/- 66.5 mU/l; week 8: 168.0 +/- 66.5 mU/l; P less than 0.01) and no variations were observed 2 weeks after drug discontinuation (week 10: 210.0 +/- 98.0 mU/l). PRL percentage change after TRH was increased by CAB (P less than 0.05). No variation in basal and TRH-stimulated TSH levels was found during CAB administration. A slight increase in GH basal levels (3.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l) was found after weeks 4 (6.4 +/- 2.0 mU/l) and 10 (5.8 +/- 1.6 mU/l) (P less than 0.05). GH response to GHRH was significantly enhanced (ANOVA: P less than 0.01) during sub-acute CAB treatment. A positive correlation was found between GH secretory area and weeks of CAB therapy (P less than 0.01). Our data show that CAB is very effective in lowering PRL secretion in hyperprolactinaemia, and is able to modify PRL and GH responses after TRH and GHRH. The increasing trend in GH basal and GHRH-stimulated GH levels seems to indicate that CAB can override the central dopaminergic tone which is operative in hyperprolactinaemia.     

Effects of theophylline infusion on the growth hormone (GH) and prolactin response to GH-releasing hormone administration in acromegaly

Since theophylline has been shown to blunt the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in normal subjects, we investigated whether the same effect of theophylline administration could be reproduced in patients with active acromegaly. Ten acromegalic patients received on two different days 100 micrograms GHRH iv alone and the same GHRH dose during a constant infusion of theophylline (3.56 mg/min), beginning 2 h before GHRH administration. In the whole group theophylline did not affect basal GH secretion significantly (from a mean of 44.6 +/- 14.4 at 0 min to 41.8 +/- 13.5 ng/ml at 120 min). However, the amount of GH released after GHRH stimulation was lower when theophylline was concomitantly infused (7525 +/- 3709 ng min/ml vs. 12038 +/- 6337 ng min/ml; p less than 0.05). The inhibitory effect of theophylline was not homogeneous, since either marked or minimal reductions of the GHRH-stimulated GH secretion occurred. Serum PRL levels increased after GHRH administration in 6 patients and theophylline infusion had no influence upon this response. Peak GHRH levels were not different in both studies (14.9 +/- 1.7 and 17.1 +/- 4.0 ng/ml, respectively). Free fatty acid levels rose progressively during theophylline administration (from 0.66 +/- 0.10 at 0 min to 1.04 +/- 0.10 mEq/l at 240 min) and were significantly higher than after GHRH stimulation alone from 180 min up to the end of the test. Our results demonstrate that in active acromegaly theophylline blunts the GH response to GHRH, though this effect is not uniformly seen in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in acromegaly before and after adenomectomy

The GHRH test may represent a new tool in the study of GH dynamics in acromegaly. GH responsiveness to GHRH 1-40 (50 micrograms iv) has been studied in 21 acromegalic patients. Nineteen out of 21 had active disease. Five patients were also studied 1-12 months after neurosurgery. Two apparently cured acromegalics were studied 1-2 yr after surgery. GH secretion has been evaluated in all patients by means of TRH, bromocriptine and insulin hypoglycemia tests, too. GH response to GHRH has also been performed in 14 normal subjects. In acromegaly, GH responses after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo) were variable. The GH peak ranged from 8 to 445 ng/ml in patients with active disease. Maximum GH increase after GHRH (calculated as peak/basal value ratio) was significantly reduced in acromegaly (2.9 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; mean +/- SE) in comparison to controls (34.1 +/- 10.9 ng/ml; p less than 0.01). No significant differences in GH pattern after GHRH were found between untreated and previously treated patients with active disease. A significant correlation was found between GH basal levels and GH incremental area (p less than 0.05) and between GH basal and peak levels (p less than 0.01) after GHRH. A significant increase in PRL secretion was observed in acromegalic patients after GHRH (p less than 0.01 vs placebo). No discernable variation was found in the other pituitary hormones pattern after the peptide administration. A positive correlation was observed between GH increase after GHRH and insulin hypoglycemia (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pituitary responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone, GH-releasing peptide-2 and thyrotrophin-releasing hormone in critical illness

OBJECTIVE Protein hypercatabolism and preservation of fat depots are hallmarks of critical illness, which is associated with blunted pulsatile GH secretion and low circulating IGF-I, TSH, T4 and T3. Repetitive TRH administration is known to reactivate the pituitary-thyroid axis and to evoke paradoxical GH release in critical illness. We further explored the hypothalamic-pituitary function in critical illness by examining the effects of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and/or GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and TRH administration. PATIENTS AND DESIGN Critically ill adults (n=40; mean age 55 years) received two i.v. boluses with a 6-hour interval (0900 and 1500 h) within a cross-over design. Patients were randomized to receive consecutively placebo and GHRP-2 (n=10), GHRH and GHRP-2 (n=10), GHRP-2 and GHRH+GHRP-2 (n=10), GHRH+GHRP-2 and GHRH+GHRP-2+TRH (n=10). The GHRH and GHRP-2 doses were 1μg/kg and the TRH dose was 200μg. Blood samples were obtained before and 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes after each injection. MEASUREMENTS Serum concentrations of GH, T4, T3, rT3, thyroid hormone binding globulin (TBG), IGF-I, insulin and cortisol were measured by RIA; PRL and TSH concentrations were determined by IRMA. RESULTS Critically ill patients presented a striking GH response to GHRP-2 (mean±SEM peak GH 51±9 μg/l in older patients and 102±2μg/l in younger patients; P=0.005 vs placebo). The mean GH response to GHRP-2 was more than fourfold higher than to GHRH (P=0.007). In turn, the mean GH response to GHRH+GHRP-2 was 2.5-fold higher than to GHRP-2 alone (P=0.01), indicating synergism. Adding TRH to the GHRH+GHRP-2 combination slightly blunted this mean response by 18% (P=0.01). GHRP-2 had no effect on serum TSH concentrations whereas both GHRH and GHRH+GHRP-2 evoked an increase in peak TSH levels of 53 and 32% respectively. The addition of TRH further increased this TSH response < ninefold (P=0.005), elicited a 60% rise in serum T3 (P=0.01) and an 18% increase in T4 (P=0.005) levels, without altering rT3 or TBG levels. GHRH and/or GHRP-2 induced a small increase in serum PRL levels. The addition of TRH magnified the PRL response 2.4-fold (P=0.007). GHRP-2 increased basal serum cortisol levels (531±29nmol/l) by 35% (P=0.02); GHRH provoked no additional response, but adding TRH further increased the cortisol response by 20% (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS The specific character of hypothalamic-pituitary function in critical illness is herewith extended to the responsiveness to GHRH and/or GHRP-2 and TRH. The observation of striking bursts of GH secretion elicited by GHRP-2 and particularly by GHRH+GHRP-2 in patients with low spontaneous GH peaks opens the possibility of therapeutic perspectives for GH secretagogues in critical care medicine.     

Hypothalamic regulation of pulsatile thyrotopin secretion.

To determine the mechanism underlying pulsatile TSH secretion, 24-h serum TSH levels were measured in three groups of five healthy volunteers by sampling blood every 10 min. The influence of an 8-h infusion of dopamine (200 mg), somatostatin (500 micrograms), or nifedipine (5 mg) on the pulsatile release of TSH was tested using a cross-over design. The amount of TSH released per pulse was significantly lowered by these drugs, resulting in significantly decreased mean basal TSH serum levels. However, pulses of TSH were still detectable at all times. The TSH response to TRH (200 micrograms) tested in separate experiments was significantly lowered after 3 h of nifedipine infusion compared to the saline control value. Nifedipine treatment did not alter basal, pulsatile, or TRH-stimulated PRL secretion. The persistence of TSH pulses under dopamine and somatostatin treatment and the blunted TSH responses to nifedipine infusion support the hypothesis that pulsatile TSH secretion is under the control of hypothalamic TRH. The 24-h TSH secretion pattern achieved under stimulation with exogenous TRH in two patients with hypothalamic destruction through surgical removal of a craniopharyngioma provided further circumstantial evidence for this assumption. No TSH pulses and low basal TSH secretion were observed under basal conditions (1700-2400 h), whereas subsequent repetitive TRH challenge (25 micrograms/2 h to 50 micrograms/1 h) led to a pulsatile release of TSH with fusion of TSH pulses, resulting in a TSH secretion pattern strikingly similar to the circadian variation. These data suggest that pulsatile and circadian TSH secretions are predominantly controlled by TRH.     

Acromegaly due to ectopic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) production: dynamic studies of GH and ectopic GHRH secretion

Dynamic studies of GH and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion were performed in a man with a GHRH-producing carcinoid tumor and acromegaly. Insulin hypoglycemia stimulated and metoclopramide inhibited both GH and GHRH acutely. Bromocriptine suppressed GH both acutely and chronically without altering circulating GHRH levels and also blunted the GH response to exogenous GHRH. TRH acutely stimulated GH, but not GHRH, secretion, and iv bolus doses of synthetic GHRH-(1-40) stimulated GH release acutely. Somatostatin infusion decreased both GH and GHRH concentrations and blunted the GH responses to TRH and GHRH-(1-40). We conclude that prolonged exposure of the pituitary gland to high concentrations of GHRH is associated with chronic GH hypersecretion and may be accompanied by a preserved acute GH response to exogenous GHRH; a paradoxical response of GH to TRH may be mediated at the pituitary level, consequent to prolonged pituitary exposure to GHRH; bromocriptine suppression of GH in acromegaly is due to a direct pituitary effect of the drug; and somatostatin inhibits both ectopic GHRH secretion as well as GH responsiveness to GHRH in vivo. Since GH secretory responses in patients with somatotroph adenomas are similar to those in this patient, augmented GHRH secretion may play a role in development of the "classic" form of acromegaly.     

Inhibitory influence of thyrotropin releasing hormone administration on growth hormone response to low doses of growth hormone-releasing hormone in normal man

Literature data show that TRH may have either stimulatory or inhibitory actions on GH release according to pathophysiological conditions of the subject. In view of this dual effect of TRH, we studied the possible interaction of TRH and GRF on GH secretion. Six healthy male volunteers received iv in different occasions and in random order: 1) GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg; 2) GRF 0.1 micrograms/Kg; 3) GRF 1 microgram/Kg; 4) GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg + TRH 400 micrograms, simultaneously; 5) GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg + TRH 20 micrograms, simultaneously; 6) GRF 1 microgram/Kg + TRH 400 micrograms, simultaneously, 7) the vehicle as control treatment. Blood samples were obtained at several time intervals and plasma GH, PRL and TSH were measured by RIA methods. Plasma GH significantly increased in all subjects after all the tested doses of GRF and after the combination of the highest and of the lowest doses of GRF + TRH (treatments 6 and 5). GH responses increased progressively with the dose of GRF administered, even if a clear dose-response relationship could not be demonstrated, owing to the considerable interindividual variability in the responsiveness. The administration of GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg increased significantly plasma GH levels vs control treatment. The simultaneous administration of a low effective dose of GRF (0.05 micrograms/kg) plus a high dose of TRH (400 micrograms) was able to significantly inhibit the GH secretion elicited by GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg alone. The other GRF + TRH combinations tested (treatments 5 and 6) did not modify the GH response to the same doses of GRF given alone. Plasma PRL and TSH did not change either after GRF at any dose or after the vehicle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)