Antigen‐specific suppression of established arthritis in mice by dendritic cells deficient in NF‐κB

Objective

NF‐κB inhibitors applied to animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) demonstrate the important role of NF‐κB in the production of mediators of inflammation in the joint and their antiinflammatory effects. Because NF‐κB is involved in the differentiation, activation, and survival of almost all cells, its prolonged inhibition might have unwanted adverse effects. Therefore, we sought to apply NF‐κB inhibitors more specifically, targeting dendritic cell (DC) differentiation, in order to influence the outcome of the autoimmune response, rather than to produce a broad antiinflammatory effect. We tested whether DCs treated with the NF‐κB inhibitor BAY 11‐7082 and exposed to arthritogenic antigen would suppress established arthritis in C57BL/6 mice.

Methods

Antigen‐induced arthritis was generated in C57BL/6 mice by injection of methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA). After mBSA challenge, mouse knee joints were injected with antigen‐exposed BAY 11‐7082–treated DCs or with soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (sTNFR). Intraarticular injection of interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) was used to induce disease flare.

Results

Inflammation and erosion were suppressed in mice that received mBSA‐exposed BAY 11‐7082–treated DCs, but not in those that received keyhole limpet hemocyanin–exposed BAY 11‐7082–treated DCs. Clinical improvement was dependent on IL‐10 and was associated with antigen‐specific suppression of the delayed‐type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction and switching of anti‐mBSA antibody isotype from IgG2b to IgG1 and IgA. Suppression of the DTH reaction or arthritic disease was not impaired by concomitant administration of sTNFR. Suppression could be reversed with intraarticular administration of IL‐1β and could be restored by a second injection of mBSA‐exposed BAY 11‐7082–treated DCs.

Conclusion

BAY 11‐7082–treated DCs induce antigen‐specific immune suppression in this model of inflammatory arthritis, even after full clinical expression of the disease. Such DCs have potential as antigen‐specific therapy for autoimmune inflammatory arthritis, including RA.

     

Increased synovial tissue NF‐κB1 expression at sites adjacent to the cartilage–pannus junction in rheumatoid arthritis

Objective

To compare the expression of the Rel/NF‐κB subunits, NF‐κB1 (p50) and RelA (p65), in paired synovial tissue samples selected from sites adjacent to and remote from the cartilage–pannus junction (CPJ) in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Methods

Synovial tissue was selected at arthroscopy from sites adjacent to the CPJ and from the suprapatellar pouch of patients who were referred to an early arthritis clinic. Tissue samples from patients with osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing knee arthroplasty were also studied. Rel/NF‐κB subunit activation and expression were measured by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and supershift analyses and by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Tissue samples were obtained from 10 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 7 with a seronegative arthropathy (SnA), and 6 with OA. Rel/NF‐κB was abundantly expressed in all samples. In both RA and SnA synovial tissue, the absolute number of NF‐κB1+ cells at the CPJ was significantly higher than at non‐CPJ sites (P = 0.006 and P = 0.02, respectively). The proportion of cells expressing NF‐κB1 was also significantly higher at the CPJ compared with non‐CPJ sites (P = 0.003 in RA, P = 0.009 in SnA). The numbers of RelA+ cells were consistently lower throughout. In RA synovial tissue, but not in SnA synovial tissue, both the absolute number and the proportion of RelA+ cells were significantly higher at the CPJ than at non‐CPJ sites (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01, respectively). In OA synovial tissue, the numbers of cells expressing NF‐κB1 and RelA were similar to those observed at the non‐CPJ sites in all inflammatory tissues studied.

Conclusion

In this study of early inflammatory arthritis, expression of NF‐κB1 in synovial tissue was highest at sites most likely to be associated with joint erosion. These observations are consistent with a critical role of NF‐κB1 in joint destruction, and support the rationale for specific therapeutic inhibition of NF‐κB in RA.

     

Inhibition of inflammatory bone erosion by constitutively active STAT‐6 through blockade of JNK and NF‐κB activation

Objective

NF‐κB and JNK signaling pathways play key roles in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis. Both factors are also activated in response to osteoclastogenic factors, such as RANKL and tumor necrosis factor α. Inflammatory arthritis and bone erosion subside in the presence of antiinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin‐4 (IL‐4). We have previously shown that IL‐4 inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro through inhibition of NF‐κB and JNK activation in a STAT‐6–dependent manner. This study was undertaken to investigate the potential of constitutively active STAT‐6 to arrest the activation of NF‐κB and JNK and to subsequently ameliorate the bone erosion associated with inflammatory arthritis in mice.

Methods

Inflammatory arthritis was induced in wild‐type and STAT‐6–null mice by intraperitoneal injection of arthritis‐eliciting serum derived from K/B×N mice. Bone erosion was assessed in the joints by histologic and immunostaining techniques. Cell‐permeable Tat‐STAT‐6 fusion proteins were administered intraperitoneally. Cells were isolated from bone marrow and from joints for the JNK assay, the DNA‐binding assays (electrophoretic mobility shift assays), and for in vitro osteoclastogenesis.

Results

Activation of NF‐κB and JNK in vivo was increased in extracts of cells retrieved from the joints of arthritic mice. Cell‐permeable, constitutively active STAT‐6 (i.e., STAT‐6‐VT) was effective in blocking NF‐κB and JNK activation in RANKL‐treated osteoclast progenitors. More importantly, STAT‐6‐VT protein significantly inhibited the in vivo activation of NF‐κB and JNK, attenuated osteoclast recruitment in the inflamed joints, and decreased bone destruction.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the administration of STAT‐6‐VT presents a novel approach to the alleviation of bone erosion in inflammatory arthritis.

     

Nuclear factor‐κB as a potential therapeutic target for the novel cytotoxic agent LC‐1 in acute myeloid leukaemia

Nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) has been implicated in a number of malignancies and has been suggested to be a potential molecular target in the treatment of leukaemia. This study demonstrated the constitutive activation of NF‐κB in human myeloid blasts and a clear correlation between NF‐κB expression and in vitro cytoprotection. High NF‐κB expression was found in many of the poor prognostic acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) subtypes, such as French‐American‐British classification M0 and M7, and the poor cytogenetic risk group. The in vitro effects of LC‐1, a novel dimethylamino‐parthenolide analogue, were assessed in 62 primary untreated AML samples. LC‐1 was found to be cytotoxic to AML cells in a dose‐dependent manner, mediated through the induction of apoptosis. The median drug concentration necessary to kill 50% of the cells was 4·5 μmol/l for AML cells, compared with 12·8 μmol/l for normal marrow cells. LC‐1 was shown to reduce the five individual human NF‐κB Rel proteins in a dose‐dependent manner. The subsequent inhibition of many NF‐κB‐regulated cytokines was also demonstrated. Importantly, sensitivity to LC‐1 was correlated with the basal NF‐κB activity. Consequently, LC‐1 treatment provides a proof of principle for the use of NF‐κB inhibitors in the treatment of AML.     

Rewired NFκB signaling as a potentially actionable feature of activated B‐cell‐like diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive lymphoma in the Western world and remains a clinical challenge. Two types of DLBCL are distinguishable, namely a germinal center B‐cell‐like phenotype (GCB) and an activated B‐cell‐like phenotype (ABC). Particularly ABC‐DLBCL is difficult to treat, as this subentity typically displays resistance against frontline chemo‐immune therapy. Through the availability of novel experimental technologies, such as next‐generation sequencing and cutting‐edge mouse models, we recently caught an unprecedentedly detailed glimpse at the genomic and biological features of ABC‐DLBCL. Currently, a picture is emerging which suggests that ABC‐DLBCL critically depends on sustained activity of the NFκB pathway, which, among others, is achieved through numerous distinct genetic aberrations, including CD79A/B‐, CARD11‐, and MYD88 mutations. Further genomic aberrations include amplifications of BCL2 and inactivating mutations in PRMD1. These molecular insights have spurred the development of novel autochthonous mouse models that faithfully mimic the biology and genetics of human ABC‐DLBCL and could serve as preclinical platforms in future experiments. Furthermore, our genomic understanding of the disease now enables us to develop and validate novel targeted therapeutic intervention strategies that aim at decapitating non‐physiological NFκB activity and repressing anti‐apoptotic BCL2 signaling. In this review, we highlight these recent developments and make suggestions for further tool development and the design and stratification of future clinical trials.     

RhoA‐mediated,tumor necrosis factor α–induced activation of NF‐κB in rheumatoid synoviocytes: Inhibitory effect of simvastatin

Objective

Increasing evidence indicates that RhoA may play a central role in the inflammatory response. This study was conducted to examine the role of RhoA in mediating the activation of NF‐κB in tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)–stimulated rheumatoid synoviocytes, and to evaluate the modulatory effects of statins on the TNFα‐induced activation of RhoA and NF‐κB and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by rheumatoid synoviocytes.

Methods

Rheumatoid synoviocytes obtained from patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were stimulated with TNFα and incubated with simvastatin (SMV) (1 μM). RhoA activity was assessed by a pull‐down assay. NF‐κB DNA binding activity and nuclear translocation of NF‐κB were measured by a sensitive multiwell colorimetric assay and confocal fluorescence microscopy, respectively.

Results

TNFα stimulation elicited a robust increase in RhoA activity in a dose‐dependent manner, and SMV mitigated this increase. TNFα also hastened NF‐κB nuclear translocation of subunit p65 and increased DNA binding activity, luciferase reporter gene expression, degradation of IκB, and secretion of interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) and IL‐6. SMV prevented the increase in NF‐κB activation and rise in IL‐1β and IL‐6 levels induced by TNFα, whereas mevalonate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate reversed the inhibitory effects of SMV on activation of NF‐κB and RhoA. Furthermore, cotransfection with a dominant‐negative mutant of RhoA demonstrated that the TNFα‐induced signaling pathway involved sequential activation of RhoA, leading to NF‐κB activation and, ultimately, to secretion of cytokines.

Conclusion

This study identifies RhoA as the key regulator of TNFα‐induced NF‐κB activation, which ultimately results in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid synoviocytes. The findings provide a new rationale for the antiinflammatory effects of statins in inflammatory arthritis.

     

NF‐κB–regulated expression of cellular FLIP protects rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts from tumor necrosis factor α–mediated apoptosis

Objective

Little apoptosis has been observed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial tissues. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is expressed in the joints of patients with RA, yet RA synovial fibroblasts are relatively resistant to apoptosis induced by TNFα. Recently, we demonstrated that FLIP is highly expressed in the RA joint. These studies were performed to determine if TNFα‐induced NF‐κB controls the expression of FLIP long (FLIP_L) and FLIP short (FLIP_S) in RA synovial fibroblasts and to determine the role of FLIP in the control of TNFα‐induced apoptosis.

Methods

RA synovial fibroblasts were isolated from RA synovial tissues and used between passages 3 and 9. RA synovial or control fibroblasts were sham infected or infected with a control adenovirus vector or one expressing the super‐repressor IκBα (srIκBα). The cells were stimulated with TNFα or a control vehicle, and expression of FLIP_L and FLIP_S was determined by isoform‐specific real‐time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. Cell viability was determined by XTT cleavage, and apoptosis was determined by annexin V staining, DNA fragmentation, and activation of caspases 8 and 3.

Results

TNFα induced the expression of both isoforms of FLIP messenger RNA (mRNA) in RA synovial fibroblasts; however, FLIP_L was the dominant isoform detected by Western blot analysis. In control fibroblasts, TNFα induced the expression of FLIP_L and FLIP_S mRNA and protein. The TNFα‐induced, but not the basal, expression of FLIP was regulated by NF‐κB. When NF‐κB activation was suppressed by the expression of srIκBα, TNFα‐mediated apoptosis was induced. TNFα‐induced apoptotic cell death was mediated by caspase 8 activation and was prevented by the ectopic expression of FLIP_L or the caspase 8 inhibitor CrmA.

Conclusion

The TNFα‐induced, but not the basal, expression of FLIP is regulated by NF‐κB in RA synovial fibroblasts. The resistance of RA synovial fibroblasts to TNFα‐induced apoptosis is mediated by the NF‐κB–regulated expression of FLIP. These observations support the role of NF‐κB and FLIP as attractive therapeutic targets in RA.

     

Melatonin synergizes the chemotherapeutic effect of 5‐fluorouracil in colon cancer by suppressing PI3K/AKT and NF‐κB/iNOS signaling pathways

5‐Fluorouracil (5‐FU) is one of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in colon cancer treatment, but has a narrow therapeutic index limited by its toxicity. Melatonin exerts antitumor activity in various cancers, but it has never been combined with 5‐FU as an anticolon cancer treatment to improve the chemotherapeutic effect of 5‐FU. In this study, we assessed such combinational use in colon cancer and investigated whether melatonin could synergize the antitumor effect of 5‐FU. We found that melatonin significantly enhanced the 5‐FU‐mediated inhibition of cell proliferation, colony formation, cell migration and invasion in colon cancer cells. We also found that melatonin synergized with 5‐FU to promote the activation of the caspase/PARP‐dependent apoptosis pathway and induce cell cycle arrest. Further mechanism study demonstrated that melatonin synergized the antitumor effect of 5‐FU by targeting the PI3K/AKT and NF‐κB/inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) signaling. Melatonin in combination with 5‐FU markedly suppressed the phosphorylation of PI3K, AKT, IKKα, IκBα, and p65 proteins, promoted the translocation of NF‐κB p50/p65 from the nuclei to cytoplasm, abrogated their binding to the iNOS promoter, and thereby enhanced the inhibition of iNOS signaling. In addition, pretreatment with a PI3K‐ or iNOS‐specific inhibitor synergized the antitumor effects of 5‐FU and melatonin. Finally, we verified in a xenograft mouse model that melatonin and 5‐FU exerted synergistic antitumor effect by inhibiting the AKT and iNOS signaling pathways. Collectively, our study demonstrated that melatonin synergized the chemotherapeutic effect of 5‐FU in colon cancer through simultaneous suppression of multiple signaling pathways.     

Role of osteopontin in induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1β through the NF‐κB and MAPK pathways in rheumatoid arthritis

Objective

Osteopontin (OPN) is a proinflammatory protein with a critical role in leukocyte migration. Although OPN has been implicated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), its underlying mechanism remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the role and molecular mechanism of OPN in the induction of 2 key chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 1β (MIP‐1β), in RA.

Methods

Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction were used to determine chemokine expression. Leukocyte migration in the presence of OPN was measured by chemotaxis assay. Signaling and molecular events were analyzed by immunoblotting and chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Results

The effect of OPN on inflammatory cell migration was mediated through its unique property of inducing the expression of MCP‐1 and MIP‐1β in CD14+ monocytes. The concentration of OPN was significantly elevated in RA patients and appeared to correlate with the serum levels of inflammation markers and increased expression of MCP‐1 or MIP‐1β in monocytes in RA patients. Endogenous production of OPN in RA synovial fluid was attributable to increased production of MCP‐1 or MIP‐1β, and this effect could be blocked by an anti‐OPN antibody. Furthermore, the structural motif responsible for this property resided within residues 50–83 of human OPN, sparing the known RGD or SVVYGLR sequences. It was evident that the effect of OPN on chemokine expression was mediated through both the NF‐κB and MAPK pathways, involving the activation of IKKβ, p38, and JNK.

Conclusion

These results support a unique role of OPN in leukocyte migration, in the context of perpetuation of rheumatoid synovitis through the induction of MCP‐1 and MIP‐1β.

     

Toll-like receptor-4 signaling: a new potential therapeutic pathway for rheumatoid arthritis

The Toll-like receptor-4 signaling (TLR-4) has been found to be over-expressed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovium. Furthermore, it regulates the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Based on the current evidences, TLR-4 may be a new potential therapeutic pathway for RA.