Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 GY at 2.5 GY per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results on late toxicity and quality of life.

PURPOSE: To present our preliminary observations on the late toxicity and quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-one patients were treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between October 1998 and May 1999. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a dynamic multileaf collimator. A total of 70.0 Gy was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 and a half weeks. The location of the prostate gland was verified and adjusted daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system. The median follow-up was 18 months (range: 11 to 26 months). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scales were used to evaluate late toxicity. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to evaluate QOL. A total of 24 patients completed the EPIC questionnaire at approximately 2 years after therapy (median time from treatment to questionnaire administration: 24 months; range: 21 to 26 months). The results from the EPIC questionnaires were compared to scores from 46 patients treated during the same time period with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. RESULTS: The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). To date, only 1 patient had Grade 1 late urinary toxicity. To date, only 4 patients had Grade 1 late rectal toxicity. No Grade 2 or 3 late urinary or rectal complications have occurred. The actuarial rectal bleeding rate observed at 18 months was 7%. There were no differences in scores from the urinary, bowel, hormonal, and overall QOL domains between SCIM-RT patients and patients treated with CRT. The overall physical and mental QOL scores were also nearly identical to scores reported for the general U.S. population. CONCLUSION: Preliminary late toxicity results up to 2 years after SCIM-RT are encouraging, with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 11 to 26 months). Late toxicity assessed by the physicians using RTOG late toxicity scores has been excellent. QOL reported by the patients using the EPIC questionnaire reveals no difference between patients treated with high-dose CRT at standard fractionation and patients treated with SCIM-RT. SCIM-RT is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule significantly increases convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time.     

Comparison of the 5-year outcome and morbidity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transperineal permanent iodine-125 implantation for early-stage prostatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival outcome and incidence of late toxicity for patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated at a single institution with either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or transperineal permanent implantation (TPI) with iodine-125 seeds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer, defined as a pretreatment PSA of less than or equal to 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score of 6 or lower, and stage less than or equal to T2b, were selected for this analysis. Between 1989 and 1996, 137 such patients were treated with 3D-CRT and 145 with TPI. The median ages of the 3D-CRT and TPI groups were 68 years and 64 years, respectively. The median dose of 3D-CRT was 70.2 Gy, and the median implant dose was 150 Gy. Prostate-specific antigen relapse was defined according to the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology Consensus Statement, and toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring scale. The median follow-up times for the 3D-CRT and TPI groups were 36 and 24 months, respectively. RESULTS: Eleven patients (8%) in the 3D-CRT group and 12 patients (8%) in the TPI group developed a biochemical relapse. The 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rates for the 3D-CRT and the TPI groups were 88% and 82%, respectively (P = .09). Protracted grade 2 urinary symptoms were more prevalent among patients treated with TPI compared with 3D-CRT. Grade 2 urinary toxicity, which was manifest after the implant and persisted for more than 1 year after this procedure, was observed in 45 patients (31%) in the TPI group. In these 45 patients, the median duration of grade 2 urinary symptoms was 23 months (range, 12 to 70 months). On the other hand, acute grade 2 urinary symptoms resolved within 4 to 6 weeks after completion of 3D-CRT, and the 5-year actuarial likelihood of late grade 2 urinary toxicity for the 3D-CRT group was only 8%. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of developing a urethral stricture (grade 3 urinary toxicity) for the 3D-CRT and TPI groups was 2% and 12%, respectively (P<.0002). Of 45 patients who developed grade 2 or higher urinary toxicity after TPI, the likelihood of resolution or significant improvement of these symptoms at 36 months from onset was 59%. The 5-year likelihood of grade 2 late rectal toxicity for the 3D-CRT and TPI patients was similar (6% and 11%, respectively; P = .97). No patient in either group developed grade 3 or higher late rectal toxicity. The 5-year likelihood of posttreatment erectile dysfunction among patients who were initially potent before therapy was 43% for the 3D-CRT group and 53% for the TPI group (P = .52). CONCLUSION: Both 3D-CRT and TPI are associated with an excellent PSA outcome for patients with early-stage prostate cancer. Urinary toxicities are more prevalent for the TPI group and subsequently resolve or improve in most patients. In addition to evaluating long-term follow-up, future comparisons will require detailed quality-of-life assessments to further determine the impact of these toxicities on the overall well-being and quality of life of the individual patient.     

Interim report of toxicity from 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406, level III (79.2 Gy)

PURPOSE: A prospective Phase I dose escalation study was conducted to determine the maximally tolerated radiation dose in men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostate cancer. This is a preliminary report of toxicity at Level III (79.2 Gy) on 3D Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 26, 1996 and October 1, 1998, 173 patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer (T1 and T2) were accrued to a Level III dose of 79.2 Gy. One hundred sixty-nine patients were available for analysis of toxicity. Patients were registered to two groups according to the risk of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) on the basis of presenting PSA and Gleason score. Group 1 patients had a calculated risk of SVI <15%, and Group 2 patients had a risk of SVI > or = 15%. For Group 1 patients, the planning target volume (PTV) margins were 5-10 mm around the prostate only. For Group 2 patients, the same margins were applied to the prostate and seminal vesicles (PTV(1)) for the initial 55.8 Gy; then treatment volume was reduced to the prostate only (PTV(2)). To reduce the rectal dose on dose Level III, the minimum PTV dose was limited to 73.8 Gy, whereas the minimum gross target volume dose was 79.2 Gy, both in 44 fractions. The incidence of > or = 3 Grade late effects was compared to that in a similar group of patients treated on RTOG 7506 and 7706 studies. RESULTS: Acute tolerance to 79.2 Gy was excellent with no patients experiencing > or = Grade 3 acute toxicity. The acute toxicity rate was comparable to that reported for previous lower dose levels. With the median follow-up of 3.3 years (range: 0.4-4.4 years), a total of 4 patients (2.4%) experienced Grade 3 late toxicity, three cases of which were related to the bladder, and one related to the rectum. There were no Grade 4 or 5 late complications noted during the period of observation. These results are also comparable to those reported at dose Levels I and II. The expected incidence of > or = 3 Grade 3 late toxicity was calculated using historical data from two previous RTOG prostate cancer trials, 7506 and 7706. The calculated risk accounted for the difference in follow-up duration between patients in this study and the historical experience. The observed rate of > or = Grade 3 late effects for Group 1 (two cases) is significantly lower (p = 0.0002) than the 17.6 cases that would have been expected from the historical control. The observed rate for Group 2 (two cases) was also significantly lower (p = 0.0037) than the 12.1 cases expected. CONCLUSION: Based on excellent tolerance of 3D-CRT for stages T1 and T2 prostate cancer, further biological dose escalation has been pursued to Levels IV and V, 74 Gy and 78 Gy, respectively, at 2 Gy per day, in an attempt to reduce the total treatment duration. This trial has closed. A Phase III comparative RTOG trial is being developed to determine whether high-dose 3D-CRT improves efficacy.     

High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients

To report the acute and late toxicity and preliminary biochemical outcomes in 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Between April 1996 and January 2001, 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment was planned using an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. A total of 698 patients (90%) were treated to 81.0 Gy, and 74 patients (10%) were treated to 86.4 Gy. Acute and late toxicities were scored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity grading scales. PSA relapse was defined according to The American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology Consensus Statement. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 6–60 months).

Thirty-five patients (4.5%) developed acute Grade 2 rectal toxicity, and no patient experienced acute Grade 3 or higher rectal symptoms. Two hundred seventeen patients (28%) developed acute Grade 2 urinary symptoms, and one experienced urinary retention (Grade 3). Eleven patients (1.5%) developed late Grade 2 rectal bleeding. Four patients (0.1%) experienced Grade 3 rectal toxicity requiring either one or more transfusions or a laser cauterization procedure. No Grade 4 rectal complications have been observed. The 3-year actuarial likelihood of ≥ late Grade 2 rectal toxicity was 4%. Seventy-two patients (9%) experienced late Grade 2 urinary toxicity, and five (0.5%) developed Grade 3 urinary toxicity (urethral stricture). The 3-year actuarial likelihood of ≥ late Grade 2 urinary toxicity was 15%. The 3-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk group patients were 92%, 86%, and 81%, respectively.

These data demonstrate the feasibility of high-dose IMRT in a large number of patients. Acute and late rectal toxicities seem to be significantly reduced compared with what has been observed with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques. Short-term PSA control rates seem to be at least comparable to those achieved with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at similar dose levels. Based on this favorable risk:benefit ratio, IMRT has become the standard mode of conformal treatment delivery for localized prostate cancer at our institution.     

Phase II trial of hypofractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To assess in a prospective trial the feasibility and late toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had clinical stage T1c-2cNXM0 disease. They received 60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks with intensity-modulated radiotherapy including daily on-line image guidance with intraprostatic fiducial markers. RESULTS: Between June 2001 and March 2004, 92 patients were treated with hypofractionated RT. The cohort had a median prostate-specific antigen value of 7.06 ng/mL. The majority had Gleason grade 5-6 (38%) or 7 (59%) disease, and 82 patients had T1c-T2a clinical staging. Overall, 29 patients had low-risk, 56 intermediate-risk, and 7 high-risk disease. Severe acute toxicity (Grade 3-4) was rare, occurring in only 1 patient. Median follow-up was 38 months. According to the Phoenix definition for biochemical failure, the rate of biochemical control at 14 months was 97%. According to the previous American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition, biochemical control at 3 years was 76%. The incidence of late toxicity was low, with no severe (Grade > or =3) toxicity at the most recent assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated RT using 60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks with image guidance is feasible and is associated with low rates of late bladder and rectal toxicity. At early follow-up, biochemical outcome is comparable to that reported for conventionally fractionated controls. The findings are being tested in an ongoing, multicenter, Phase III trial.     

Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term relapse-free survival and toxicity rates in patients treated with hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study sample includes the first 100 consecutive localized prostate cancer patients treated to 70.0 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction. The median follow-up was 66 months (range, 3 to 75 months). Biochemical failure was the study endpoint, using both the ASTRO definition (A-bRFS) and the alternate "nadir + 2 ng/mL" definition (N-bRFS). RTOG scores were used to assess toxicity. RESULTS: The 5-year A-bRFS and N-bRFS rates were 85% (95%CI, 78-93%) and 88% (95%CI, 82-95%) for all cases, respectively. For low, intermediate and high-risk disease, the 5-year A-bRFS rates were 97%, 88%, and 70%. The corresponding 5-year N-bRFS rates were 97%, 93%, and 75%, respectively. The acute rectal toxicity scores were 0 in 20, 1 in 61, and 2 in 19 patients. The acute urinary toxicity scores were 0 in 9, 1 in 76, and 2 in 15 patients. The late rectal toxicity scores were 0 in 71, 1 in 19, 2 in 7, and 3 in 3 patients. The actuarial late Grade 3 rectal toxicity rate at 5 years was 3%. A number of the toxicities observed either resolved spontaneously or were corrected. At last follow-up, the rate of combined Grades 2 and 3 late rectal toxicity at 5 years was only 5%. The late urinary toxicity scores were 0 in 75, 1 in 13, 2 in 11, and 3 in 1 patients. The actuarial late Grade 3 urinary toxicity rate at 5 years was 1%. CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 66 months, the long-term results after high-dose hypofractionation are excellent. Late toxicity, urinary and rectal, has been limited. High-dose hypofractionation is an alternative dose escalation method in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.     

Acute and late complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy to 78 Gy

PURPOSE: To compare acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) side effects in prostate cancer patients randomized to receive 68 Gy or 78 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1997 and February 2003, 669 prostate cancer patients were randomized between radiotherapy with a dose of 68 Gy and 78 Gy, in 2 Gy per fraction and using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. All T stages with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <60 ng/mL were included, except any T1a and well-differentiated T1b-c tumors with PSA < or =4 ng/mL. Stratification was done for four dose-volume groups (according to the risk of seminal vesicles [SV] involvement), age, hormonal treatment (HT), and hospital. The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the prostate with or without the SV, depending on the estimated risk of SV invasion. The CTV-planning target volume (PTV) margin was 1 cm for the first 68 Gy and was reduced to 0.5 cm (0 cm toward the rectum) for the last 10 Gy in the 78 Gy arm. Four Dutch hospitals participated in this Phase III trial. Evaluation of acute and late toxicity was based on 658 and 643 patients, respectively. For acute toxicity (<120 days), the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring system was used and the maximum score was reported. Late toxicity (>120 days) was scored according to the slightly adapted RTOG/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 31 months. For acute toxicity no significant differences were seen between the two randomization arms. GI toxicity Grade 2 and 3 was reported as the maximum acute toxicity in 44% and 5% of the patients, respectively. For acute GU toxicity, these figures were 41% and 13%. No significant differences between both randomization arms were seen for late GI and GU toxicity, except for rectal bleeding requiring laser treatment or transfusion (p = 0.007) and nocturia (p = 0.05). The 3-year cumulative risk of late RTOG/EORTC GI toxicity grade > or =2 was 23.2% for 68 Gy, and 26.5% for 78 Gy (p = 0.3). The 3-year risks of late RTOG/EORTC GU toxicity grade > or =2 were 28.5% and 30.2% for 68 Gy and 78 Gy, respectively (p = 0.3). Factors related to acute GI toxicity were HT (p < 0.001), a higher dose-volume group (p = 0.01), and pretreatment GI symptoms (p = 0.04). For acute GU toxicity, prognostic factors were: pretreatment GU symptoms (p < 0.001), HT (p = 0.003), and prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (p = 0.02). A history of abdominal surgery (p < 0.001) and pretreatment GI symptoms (p = 0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of late GI grade > or =2 toxicity, whereas HT (p < 0.001), pretreatment GU symptoms (p < 0.001), and prior TURP (p = 0.006) were prognostic factors for late GU grade > or =2. CONCLUSIONS: Raising the dose to the prostate from 68 Gy to 78 Gy resulted in higher incidences of acute and late GI and GU toxicity, but these differences were not significant, except for late rectal bleeding requiring treatment and late nocturia. Other factors than the studied dose levels appeared to be important in predicting toxicity after radiotherapy, especially previous surgical interventions (abdominal surgery or TURP), hormonal therapy, and the presence of pretreatment symptoms.     

Salvage hypofractionated radiotherapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether hypofractionation is well tolerated and to preliminarily assess biochemical control of this regimen in a postprostatectomy, salvage setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 50 patients treated between May 2003 and December 2005 with hypofractionated radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Radiotherapy was prescribed to the prostatic fossa to 65-70 Gy in 26-28 fractions of 2.5 Gy each, using intensity-modulated radiotherapy with daily image localization. Toxicities were scored using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale and the Fox Chase modification of Late Effects Normal Tissue scale. The median follow-up was 18.9 months (range, 5.3-35.9). RESULTS: No Grade 3 or greater acute or late toxicities were observed. Grade 2 toxicities included four acute genitourinary, one acute gastrointestinal, two late genitourinary, and two late gastrointestinal toxicities. Of the 50 patients, 39 demonstrated a continuous biochemical response after salvage therapy, 3 had an initial response before prostate-specific antigen failure, and 7 had prostate-specific antigen progression, 1 of whom died of progressive metastatic disease. Finally, 1 patient discontinued therapy because of the diagnosis of a metachronous pancreatic cancer and died without additional prostate cancer follow-up. All remaining patients were alive at the last follow-up visit. A lower presalvage prostate-specific antigen level was the only significant prognostic factor for improved biochemical control. The estimated actuarial biochemical control rate at 2 years was 72.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity and early biochemical response rates were consistent with expectations from conventional fractionation. Additional follow-up is required to better document the biochemical control, but these results suggest that hypofractionation is a well-tolerated approach for salvage radiotherapy.     

Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose-response

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to use the outcome of a dose escalation protocol for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) of prostate cancer to study the dose-response for late rectal toxicity and to identify anatomic, dosimetric, and clinical factors that correlate with late rectal bleeding in multivariate analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven hundred forty-three patients with T1c-T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT with prescribed doses of 64.8 to 81.0 Gy. The 5-year actuarial rate of late rectal toxicity was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A retrospective dosimetric analysis was performed for patients treated to 70.2 Gy (52 patients) or 75.6 Gy (119 patients) who either exhibited late rectal bleeding (RTOG Grade 2/3) within 30 months after treatment (i.e., 70.2 Gy-13 patients, 75. 6 Gy-36 patients) or were nonbleeding for at least 30 months (i.e., 70.2 Gy-39 patients, 75.6 Gy-83 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to correlate late rectal bleeding with several anatomic, dosimetric, and clinical variables. RESULTS: A dose response for >/= Grade 2 late rectal toxicity was observed. By multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly correlated with >/= Grade 2 late rectal bleeding for patients prescribed 70.2 Gy: 1) enclosure of the outer rectal contour by the 50% isodose on the isocenter slice (i.e., Iso50) (p < 0.02), and 2) smaller anatomically defined rectal wall volume (p < 0.05). After 75.6 Gy, the following factors were significant: 1) smaller anatomically defined rectal wall volume (p < 0.01), 2) higher rectal D(max) (p < 0.01), 3) enclosure of rectal contour by Iso50 (p < 0.01), 4) patient age (p = 0.02), and 5) history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04). In addition to these five factors, acute rectal toxicity was also significantly correlated (p = 0.05) with late rectal bleeding when patients from both dose groups were combined in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: A multivariate logistic regression model is presented which describes the probability of developing late rectal bleeding after conformal irradiation of prostate cancer. Late rectal bleeding correlated with factors which may indicate that a greater fractional volume of rectal wall was exposed to high dose, such as smaller rectal wall volume, inclusion of the rectum within the 50% isodose on the isocenter slice, and higher rectal D(max).     

Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: Cleveland Clinic experience

PURPOSE: To study the outcomes in patients treated for localized prostate cancer with 70 Gy delivered at 2.5-Gy/fraction within 5 weeks. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study sample included all 770 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated with hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy at the Cleveland Clinic between 1998 and 2005. The median follow-up was 45 months (maximum, 86). Both the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) biochemical failure definition and the alternate nadir + 2 ng/mL definition were used. RESULTS: The overall 5-year ASTRO biochemical relapse-free survival rate was 82% (95% confidence interval, 79-85%), and the 5-year nadir + 2 ng/mL rate was 83% (95% confidence interval, 79-86%). For patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease, the 5-year ASTRO rate was 95%, 85%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year nadir + 2 ng/mL rate for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease was 94%, 83%, and 72%, respectively. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute rectal toxicity scores were 0 in 51%, 1 in 40%, and 2 in 9% of patients. The acute urinary toxicity scores were 0 in 33%, 1 in 48%, 2 in 18%, and 3 in 1% of patients. The late rectal toxicity scores were 0 in 89.6%, 1 in 5.9%, 2 in 3.1%, 3 in 1.3%, and 4 in 0.1% (1 patient). The late urinary toxicity scores were 0 in 90.5%, 1 in 4.3%, 2 in 5.1%, and 3 in 0.1% (1 patient). CONCLUSION: The outcomes after high-dose hypofractionation were acceptable in the entire cohort of patients treated with the schedule of 70 at 2.5 Gy/fraction.     

Stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy of the prostate (SHARP), 33.5 Gy in five fractions for localized disease: first clinical trial results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy (SHARP) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Phase I/II trial of SHARP performed for localized prostate cancer using 33.5 Gy in 5 fractions, calculated to be biologically equivalent to 78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (alpha/beta ratio of 1.5 Gy). Noncoplanar conformal fields and daily stereotactic localization of implanted fiducials were used for treatment. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were evaluated by American Urologic Association (AUA) score and Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and self-reported sexual function were recorded at specified follow-up intervals. RESULTS: The study includes 40 patients. The median follow-up is 41 months (range, 21-60 months). Acute toxicity Grade 1-2 was 48.5% (GU) and 39% (GI); 1 acute Grade 3 GU toxicity. Late Grade 1-2 toxicity was 45% (GU) and 37% (GI). No late Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. Twenty-six patients reported potency before therapy; 6 (23%) have developed impotence. Median time to PSA nadir was 18 months with the majority of nadirs less than 1.0 ng/mL. The actuarial 48-month biochemical freedom from relapse is 70% for the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition and 90% by the alternative nadir + 2 ng/mL failure definition. CONCLUSIONS: SHARP for localized prostate cancer is feasible with minimal acute or late toxicity. Dose escalation should be possible.     

Long-term androgen deprivation increases Grade 2 and higher late morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

PURPOSE: To determine whether the use of androgen deprivation (AD) increases late morbidity when combined with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1989 and November 1998, 1,204 patients were treated for prostate cancer with 3D-CRT to a median dose of 74 Gy. Patients were evaluated every 3-6 months. No AD was given to 945 patients, whereas 140 and 119 patients, respectively, received short-term AD (STAD; < or =6 months) and long-term AD (LTAD; > 6 months). Radiation morbidity was graded according to the Fox Chase modification of the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force late morbidity scale. Covariates in the multivariate analysis (MVA) included age, history of diabetes mellitus, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, T category, RT field size, total RT dose, use of rectal shielding, and AD status (no AD vs. STAD vs. LTAD). RESULTS: The only independent predictor for Grade 2 or higher genitourinary (GU) morbidity in the MVA was the use of AD (p = 0.0065). The 5-year risk of Grade 2 or higher GU morbidity was 8% for no AD, 8% for STAD, and 14% for LTAD (p = 0.02). Independent predictors of Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) morbidity in the MVA were the use of AD (p = 0.0079), higher total radiation dose (p < 0.0001), the lack of a rectal shield (p = 0.0003), and older age (p = 0.0009). The 5-year actuarial risk of Grade 2 or higher GI morbidity was 17% for no AD vs. 18% for STAD and 26% for LTAD (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The use of LTAD seems to significantly increase the risk of both GU and GI morbidity for patients treated with 3D-CRT.     

Impact of image guidance on outcomes after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To verify whether rectal distention at the time of planning impacts outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with daily image guidance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2002, a total of 488 prostate cancer patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiation dose was 70 Gy delivered at 2.5 Gy per fraction in all cases. All cases were treated with a 4-mm margin posteriorly. In all cases the total rectal volume documented on the CT scan was used for treatment planning. No special bowel preparation instructions were given, either for the simulation or the daily treatments. Before each daily treatment, alignment of the prostate was performed with the B-mode acquisition and targeting (BAT) transabdominal ultrasound system. The median follow-up for all 488 patients was 60 months (range, 24-96 months). RESULTS: For all patients the biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate at 5 years was 86%. The 5-year bRFS rate for the rectal distention<50 cm3, 50 to <100 cm3, and >or=100 cm3 groups was 90%, 83%, and 85%, respectively (p=0.18). To adjust for other potential variables affecting bRFS rates, a multivariate time-to-failure analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model was performed. Rectal distention was not an independent predictor of biochemical failure on multivariate analysis (p=0.80). Rectal distention was not a predictor of rectal or urinary toxicity. CONCLUSION: The use of daily image guidance eliminates errors such as rectal distention at the initial planning stage that can affect outcomes after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.     

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer at an Asian Cancer Specialist Centre

Introduction: The current treatment options for localized prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) gaining interest as a treatment option compared to standard fractionation radiation therapy. This present study is a retrospective study evaluating the correlations between the biochemical efficacy, and treatment toxicity in SBRT for localized prostate cancer. Methods: All organ-confined prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT from 2010 to 2018, at Beacon Hospital, Malaysia were included in this study. Patient demographics, dosimetric parameters, and disease information were retrospectively collected. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence-free survival assessed using the Phoenix definition (Nadir + 2 ng/mL). Toxicity outcomes were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. Results: Fourty-nine patients who met the inclusion criteria (5 low-, 13 intermediate- and 31 high-risk according to the D’amico Risk Classification) received SBRT. The most common dose regime was 34-35Gy in 5 fractions (n=18). Other dose regimes were 24Gy in 3 fractions and 25-33Gy in 5 fractions. Median follow-up was 45.4 months. The median pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 11.22 ng/mL, which decreased to a median PSA of 0.1 ng/mL by 2 years post-treatment. Out of the 49 cases, only 1 case of biochemical recurrence occurred, yielding a 3- and 5-year overall survival of 100%, and a 3- and 5- year biochemical recurrence-free rate of 100% and 95.2%. Acute grade III urinary toxicities occurred in 1 (2%); whereas acute grade I urinary and rectal toxicities were seen in 22 (44.9%) and 7 (14.3%) patients respectively. Grade I and grade III late rectal toxicities occurred in 3 and 1 patients respectively, while 3 and 1 patient reported late grade I and III urethral stricture respectively. Conclusion: SBRT for clinically-localized and locally advanced prostate cancer provided promising outcomes with low toxicity and good biochemical control.     

Combined 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and transperineal Pd-103 permanent implantation for patients with intermediate and unfavorable risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and morbidity of combined 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and brachytherapy for intermediate/unfavorable risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1996 and November 1997, 65 patients with intermediate/unfavorable risk prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT (50.4 Gy) followed by a transperineal permanent Pd-103 implant. Patients with one or two adverse prognostic features (PSA > 10 and Gleason > or = 7) were classified as intermediate risk and unfavorable risk, respectively. Forty-seven patients (71%) had intermediate risk and 18 (29%) had unfavorable disease risk. The median age of this group was 65 years (range, 42-76 years), and the median pretreatment PSA level was 8.0 ng/ml (range, 1.7-42.0 ng/ml). The clinical stage of these patients was as follows: Tlc, 36 (55%); T2a, 27 (42%); T2b/T3, 2 (3%). Fifteen patients (23%) had a Gleason < or = 6, 41 patients (63%) were classified as Gleason 7, and 9 (14%) as Gleason > or = 8. Fifty-two (80%) received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) for cytoreduction. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-42 months). RESULTS: The PSA relapse-free survival rate at 3 years was 87%, with a median PSA value at last follow-up of 0.25 ng/ml. The relapse-free survival was 90% for those who had an initial PSA < or = 10 ng/ml and 80% for patients who had an initial PSA > 10 ng/ml (p = 0.5). No difference in outcome was observed between patients with intermediate and unfavorable risk disease. Eight patients (13%) developed late Grade 2 rectal bleeding. Twenty-three patients (42%) required medication for urinary symptoms during the first 6 months after therapy. Three patients (5 %) noted rare stress incontinence at last follow-up. Of the 44 patients who were potent prior to therapy, 17 (26%) developed erectile dysfunction (ED). CONCLUSION: Although the follow-up is short, the early biochemical outcome of combined 3D-CRT and brachytherapy for intermediate/unfavorable risk prostate cancer is promising. While rectal toxicity is minimal, urinary side effects are more common. Further follow-up is necessary to fully evaluate the efficacy of this combined therapeutic approach.     

Long term tolerance of high dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The current study was undertaken to evaluate the incidence and predictors of late toxicity in patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated with high dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS: A total of 743 patients with prostate carcinoma classified as T1c-T3 were treated with 3D-CRT that targeted the prostate and seminal vesicles. A minimum tumor dose of 64.8 gray (Gy) was given to 96 patients (13%), 70.2 Gy to 266 patients (365), 75.6 Gy to 320 patients (43%), and 81.0 Gy to 61 patients (8%). The median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 18-109 months). Late toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring scale. RESULTS: Late gastrointestinal (GI) and urinary (GU) toxicities were absent or minimal (Grade 0 or 1) in 90% of patients. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of the development of Grade 2 and 3 late GI toxicities was 11% and 0.75%, respectively. A multivariate analysis identified doses > or =75.6 Gy (P<0.001), history of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.01), and the presence of acute GI symptoms during treatment (P = 0.02) as independent predictors of Grade > or =2 late GI toxicity. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of the development of Grade 2 and 3 late GU toxicities was 10% and 3%, respectively. Doses > or =75.6 Gy (P = 0.008) and acute GU symptoms (P<0.001) were independent predictors of Grade > or =2 late GU toxicity. Among 544 patients who were potent before treatment (73% of all patients), 211 (39%) became impotent after 3D-CRT. The 5-year actuarial risk of potency loss was 60%. Doses > or =75.6 Gy (P<0.001) and the use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (P = 0.01) were independent predictors of posttreatment erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of severe late complications after high dose 3D-CRT was minimal. Radiation doses > or =75.6 Gy and the presence of acute treatment-related symptoms during 3D-CRT correlated with a higher incidence of Grade > or =2 late GI and GU toxicities. In addition to higher doses, the use of androgen deprivation therapy increased the likelihood of permanent impotence in these patients. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, which makes it possible to enhance the conformality of the dose distribution, has recently been implemented in an attempt to reduce the incidence of moderate grade toxicities in patients receiving high dose 3D-CRT.     

Whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlations between observed clinical morbidity and dosimetric parameters for whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) for prostate cancer using either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 1996 and January 2002, 27 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma were treated with conformal WPRT as part of their definitive treatment. WPRT was delivered with 3D-CRT in 14 patients and with IMRT in 13 patients. For each of the patients treated with IMRT, optimized conventional two-dimensional (2D) and 3D-CRT plans were retrospectively generated for the whole pelvic phase of the treatment. Dose-volume histograms for the bowel, bladder, and rectum were compared for the three techniques. Acute toxicities were evaluated for all 27 patients, and late toxicities were evaluated for 25 patients with sufficient follow-up. Toxicities were scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity grading scales. Median follow-up was 30 months. RESULTS: Three-dimensional-CRT resulted in a 40% relative reduction (p < 0.001) in the volume of bowel receiving 45 Gy compared with 2D, and IMRT provided a further 60% reduction relative to 3D-CRT (p < 0.001). Compared with either 2D or 3D-CRT, IMRT reduced the volume of rectum receiving 45 Gy by 90% (p < 0.001). Overall, 9 patients (33%) experienced acute Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and only 1 of these patients was treated with IMRT. Antidiarrhea medication was required for 6 patients (22%). However, 5 of these 6 patients also received chemotherapy, and none were treated with IMRT. No Grade 3 or higher acute or late GI toxicities were observed. No cases of late radiation enteritis were observed. Acute and late genitourinary toxicity did not appear significantly increased by the addition of conformal WPRT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional 2D planning, conformal planning for WPRT resulted in significant reductions in the doses delivered to the bowel, rectum, and bladder. IMRT was superior to 3D-CRT in limiting the volume of bowel and rectum within high-dose regions. These dosimetric findings correlated with low rates of acute and late GI morbidity.     

Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with daily transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate gland

PURPOSE: To present our initial observations on the clinical feasibility of the technique of short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer coupled with daily transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate. The proposed regimen consists of a hypofractionated course delivering 70.0 Gy in 28 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The treatment data of the first 51 patients treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation are presented in this report. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a Varian Dynamic Multileaf Collimator. The target was the prostate only in patients with low-risk disease (stage T1-T2, pretreatment PSA < or =10, and biopsy Gleason < or =6). The target was the prostate and seminal vesicles in patients with high-risk disease (stage T3 or pretreatment PSA > 10 or biopsy Gleason > or =7). In the Corvus planning system, the margins for the planning target volume (PTV) were 4 mm posteriorly, 8 mm laterally, and 5 mm in all other directions. A total of 70.0 Gy (mean prostate dose approximately 75 Gy) was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 1/2 weeks. Prior to treatment delivery, the patients were minimally immobilized on the treatment table, only using lasers and skin marks. The location of the prostate gland was verified daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system and patient position adjustments were performed accordingly. Fifty-one patients completed therapy between October 1998 and May 1999. RESULTS: The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). The range of the maximum doses was 77.4 to 84.5 Gy (average: 80.2 Gy). The range of the minimum doses was 64.3 to 69.2 Gy (average: 67.5 Gy). The average time for the prostate position verification and alignment of the prostate using the BAT system was 5 minutes. The entire localization/alignment process was performed by the radiation therapists. The daily alignment images were automatically saved and reviewed by the radiation oncologist, a process similar to port film checks. The total treatment (beam-on) time was around 6 minutes using the 5 static intensity-modulated fields. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of bladder volumes irradiated to 50, 60, and 70 Gy were as follows: 24 +/- 11 cc, 16 +/- 8 cc, and 8 +/- 6 cc. The mean and SD of rectal volumes irradiated to 50, 60, and 70 Gy were as follows: 22 +/- 11 cc, 15 +/- 8 cc, and 7 +/- 5 cc. The RTOG acute bladder toxicity scores were as follows: 0 in 3 (6%), 1 in 38 (74%), and 2 in 10 (20%). The RTOG acute rectal toxicity scores for SCIM-RT cases were as follows: 0 in 10 (20%), 1 in 33 (65%), and 2 in 8 (16%). No Grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: The delivery of our proposed hypofractionated-schedule SCIM-RT in combination with daily target localization/alignment with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system is clinically feasible. It is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule would significantly increase convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time. Preliminary acute toxicity results are extremely encouraging. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess late complications and treatment efficacy.     

Initial evaluation of treatment-related pneumonitis in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To investigate the rate of high-grade treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From August 2002 to August 2005, 151 NSCLC patients were treated with IMRT. We excluded patients who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy or who had early-stage cancers, a history of major lung surgery, prior chest RT, a dose <50 Gy, or IMRT combined with three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT). Toxicities were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Grade > or = 3 TRP for 68 eligible IMRT patients was compared with TRP among 222 similar patients treated with 3D-CRT. RESULTS: The median follow-up durations for the IMRT and 3D-CRT patients were 8 months (range, 0-27 months) and 9 months (range, 0-56 months), respectively. The median IMRT and 3D-CRT doses were 63 Gy. The median gross tumor volume was 194 mL (range, 21-911 mL) for IMRT, compared with 142 mL (range, 1.5-1,186 mL) for 3D-CRT (p = 0.002). Despite the IMRT group's larger gross tumor volume, the rate of Grade > or = 3 TRP at 12 months was 8% (95% confidence interval 4%-19%), compared with 32% (95% confidence interval 26%-40%) for 3D-CRT (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation, IMRT resulted in significantly lower levels of Grade > or = 3 TRP compared with 3D-CRT. Clinical, dosimetric, and patient selection factors that may have influenced rates of TRP require continuing investigation. A randomized trial comparing IMRT with 3D-CRT has been initiated.