Effects of closed versus open kinetic chain knee extensor resistance training on knee laxity and leg function in patients during the 8- to 14-week post-operative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Open kinetic chain (OKC) knee extensor resistance training has lost favour in ACLR rehabilitation due to concerns that this exercise is harmful to the graft and will be less effective in improving function. In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial OKC and closed kinetic chain (CKC) knee extensor training were compared for their effects on knee laxity and function in the middle period of ACLR rehabilitation. The study subjects were 49 patients recovering from ACLR surgery (37 M, 12 F; mean age=33 years). Tests were carried out at 8 and 14 weeks after ACLR with knee laxity measured using a ligament arthrometer and function with the Hughston Clinic knee self-assessment questionnaire and single leg, maximal effort jump testing (post-test only). Between tests, subjects trained using either OKC or CKC resistance of their knee and hip extensors as part of formal physical therapy sessions three times per week. No statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, p>0.05) differences were found between the treatment groups in knee laxity or leg function. OKC and CKC knee extensor training in the middle period of rehabilitation after ACLR surgery do not differ in their effects on knee laxity or leg function. Exercise dosages are described in this study and further research is required to assess whether the findings in this study are dosage specific.     

Knee extensors kinetic chain training in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

Open kinetic chain (OKC) knee extensor resistance training has lost favour in rehabilitation of patients with knee ACLD due to concerns that this exercise is harmful to the remaining portion of the ACL and its secondary stabilizers, and will be less effective in improving function. In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial, closed and OKC knee extensor training were compared for their effects on knee laxity and function in patients with ACLD knees. Sixty-four patients with a diagnosis of knee ACLD (49 M, 15 F; mean age=30 years) were measured for knee laxity, using a ligament arthrometer, and function with the Hughston Clinic knee self-assessment questionnaire and maximal effort single leg jump testing. Between the above tests and identical tests carried out 6 weeks later, subjects trained using either open or closed kinetic chain resistance of their knee and hip extensors as part of formal physical therapy sessions three times per week for 6 weeks. The groups exhibited no statistically significant differences (p<0.083) in outcome. These results indicate that knee extensor OKC training, as used in this study, can be safely applied to patients with knee ACL deficiency, and shows no superiority to CKC training.     

Closed kinetic chain alone compared to combined open and closed kinetic chain exercises for quadriceps strengthening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with respect to return to sports: a prospective matched follow-up study

Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has focused over the past decade on closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises due to presumably less strain on the graft than with isokinetic open kinetic chain exercises (OKC); however, recent reports suggest that there are only minor differences in ACL strain values between some CKC and OKC exercises. We studied anterior knee laxity, thigh muscle torque, and return to preinjury sports level in 44 patients with unilateral ACL; group 1 carried out quadriceps strengthening only with CKC while group 2 trained with CKC plus OKC exercises starting from week 6 after surgery. Anterior knee laxity was determined with a KT-1000 arthrometer; isokinetic concentric and eccentric quadriceps and hamstring muscle torque were studied with a Kin-Com dynamometer before and 6 months after surgery. At an average of 31 months after surgery the patients answered a questionnaire regarding their current knee function and physical activity/sports to determine the extent and timing of their recovery. No significant differences in anterior knee laxity were noted between the groups 6 months postsurgery. Patients in group 2 increased their quadriceps torque significantly more than those in group 1, but no differences were found in hamstring torque between the groups. A significantly higher number of patients in group 2 (n=12) than in group 1 (n=5) returned to sports at the same level as before the injury (P<0.05). Patients from group 2 who returned to sports at the same level did so 2 months earlier than those in group 1. Thus the addition of OKC quadriceps training after ACL reconstruction results in a significantly better improvement in quadriceps torque without reducing knee joint stability at 6 months and also leads to a significantly higher number of athletes returning to their previous activity earlier and at the same level as before injury.     

Correlates of knee laxity change in early rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Factors other than ligament graft length (knee ROM, knee swelling, initial knee laxity) may need to be accounted for in interpreting changes in knee laxity during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. Twenty-three patients recovering from ACLR surgery (16 M, 7 F, age mean = 30) were tested at 2 and 6 weeks after ACLR with knee laxity measured using th Knee Signature System arthrometer, passive ROM with a standard goniometer and swelling by measuring knee circumference at the mid-patella level using a cloth measuring tape. Spearman correlation coefficients (in parentheses) were calculated using rankings of the change in the injured minus uninjured knee laxity as the dependent variable and the following independent variables: pre-test injured minus uninjured knee laxity (ranked; -0.457; statistically significant two-tailed P < 0.05); change in injured knee maximum extension relative to the uninjured side (ranked; 0.127); change in injured knee maximum flexion relative to the uninjured side (unranked; -0.073); and change in the injured minus uninjured knee girth (unranked; -0.159). These results indicate that consideration should be given to the patient's knee laxity at the start of intervention when using changes in laxity to guide rehabilitation after ACLR.     

Warming-up before sporting activity improves knee position sense

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of a warm-up program on knee joint position sense in karatekas.DesignRepeated measures design.SettingResearch laboratory. Participants: Ten young amateur karatekas (17.6 ± 4.0 years of age).Main Outcome MeasuresKnee joint position sense evaluated before and immediately after a warm-up program through active repositioning in open kinetic chain (OKC) and closed kinetic chain (CKC).ResultsAt baseline testing no differences were observed between OKC and CKC in absolute (4.1 ± 1.6° vs. 3.4 ± 2.0°) and relative angular errors (2.4 ± 3.4° vs. 2.1 ± 3.5°). After the warm-up program, a significant decrease in absolute angular error was observed only in CKC (from 3.4 ± 2.0° to 1.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.05). Additionally, in CKC the subjects reduced the relative angular error to approximately zero (from 2.1 ± 3.5° to ?0.01 ± 1.6°) and decreased the variability of the responses, expressed by the decrease in standard deviation of the relative errors.ConclusionsThe warm-up program enhanced knee joint position sense only in CKC. Since no effects were detected in OKC, the evaluation of the effects of warm-up on knee joint position sense using merely an OKC technique would underestimate the valuable role of warm-up.     

Open- or closed-kinetic chain exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Open-kinetic chain (OKC) and closed-kinetic chain (CKC) exercises may not differ in their effects on the healing response of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knee. Recent biomechanical studies have shown that the peak strains produced on a graft are similar. Clinical studies suggest that both play a beneficial role in the early rehabilitation of the reconstructed knee.     

Early versus late start of open kinetic chain quadriceps exercises after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring grafts: a prospective randomized outcome study

The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate physical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with early versus late initiation of open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises for the quadriceps in patients operated on either patellar tendon or hamstring grafts. Sixty-eight patients, 36 males and 32 females, with either patellar tendon graft (34 patients) or hamstring graft (34 patients) were enrolled in this study. All patients were randomly allocated to either early (the 4th postoperative week) or late (the 12th postoperative week) start of OKC exercises for the quadriceps, resulting in four subgroups: patellar tendon reconstruction, early start (P4) or late start (P12) of OKC quadriceps exercises, hamstring tendon reconstruction, early start (H4) or late start (H12) of quadriceps OKC exercises. Prior to surgery and 3, 5 and 7 months later, assessments of range of motion (goniometer), anterior knee laxity (KT-1000), postural sway (KAT 2000), thigh muscle torques (Kin–Com dynamometer) and anterior knee pain (anterior knee pain score) were evaluated. No significant group differences were found in terms of range of motion 3, 5 and 7 months postoperatively. The H4 group showed a significantly higher mean difference of laxity over time of 1.0 mm (CI: 0.18–1.86) than the P4 group (P = 0.04). Within the same type of surgery, the H4 against the H12, the mean difference over time was 1.2 mm (0.37–2.1) higher in the H4 group than in the H12 group (P = 0.01). There were no significant group differences in terms of postural sway or anterior knee pain at the different test occasions. Significant differences in trends (changes over time) were found when comparing the four groups, for both quadriceps muscle torques (P < 0.001) and hamstring muscle torques (P < 0.001). All groups, except the P4 group, reached preoperative values of quadriceps muscle torques at the 7 months follow-up. In the H4 and the H12 groups, significantly lower hamstring muscle torques at the 7 months follow-up compared with preoperative values were found. In conclusion, early start of OKC quadriceps exercises after hamstring ACL reconstruction resulted in significantly increased anterior knee laxity in comparison with both late start and with early and late start after bone–patellar tendon–bone ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, the early introduction of OKC exercises for quadriceps did not influence quadriceps muscle torques neither in patients operated on patellar tendon nor hamstring tendon grafts. On the contrary, it appears as if the choice of graft affected the strength of the specific muscle more than the type of exercises performed. Our results could not determine the appropriate time for starting OKC quadriceps exercises for patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft. Future studies of long-term results of anterior knee laxity and functional outcome are needed.     

Exercise-related knee joint laxity

Knee injuries are the topic of increasingly sophisticated research because of the importance in professional athletics as well as increasing participation in recreational sports. The role of conditioning and fatigue in these injuries remains controversial. Ligaments have high collagen content, and a viscoelastic response to stress would be expected. Because of the postulated relationship between laxity and knee ligament injuries, an experiment was designed using highly motivated athletes to test the hypothesis that exercise to the point of muscular fatigue may cause laxity of the knee and thereby place athletes at risk for ligamentous injury to the knee when fatigued. An exercise protocol was designed to produce muscle fatigue in the hamstring and quadriceps muscle groups. Knee ligament laxity was tested prior to and subsequent to the exercise protocol. To document muscle fatigue, isokinetic testing of right knee flexion and extension power was used several times during the exercise protocol. A knee arthrometer (KT-1000) was used to quantitatively document ligamentous laxity before and after exercise. The results indicated a significant lengthening in knee joint laxity between preexercise and postexercise in the left knee as measured at 15 and 20 pounds of passive displacement force (P less than 0.05). Maximum manual displacement also demonstrated a significant increase in joint laxity (P = 0.02). The right knee, which had undergone isokinetic testing, demonstrated a similar tendency but without a statistically significant difference before and after exercise. There was no significant preexercise side to side difference, but postexercise measurements demonstrated a left-right difference at 15 pounds, 20 pounds, and maximum manual displacement of statistical significance (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the acute perceptual and blood pressure response to heavy load and light load blood flow restriction resistance exercise in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients and non-injured populations

ObjectivesTo compare the acute perceptual and blood pressure responses to: 1) light load blood flow restriction resistance exercise (BFR-RE) in non-injured individuals and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients; and 2) light load BFR-RE and heavy load RE (HL-RE) in ACLR patients.DesignBetween-subjects, partially-randomised.MethodsThis study comprised 3 groups: non-injured BFR-RE (NI-BFR); ACLR patients BFR-RE (ACLR-BFR); ACLR patients HL-RE (ACLR-HL). NI-BFR and ACLR-BFR performed 4 sets (30, 15, 15, 15 reps, total = 75 reps, 30s inter-set rest) of unilateral leg press exercise at 30% 1RM with continuous BFR at 80% limb occlusive pressure. ACLR-HL performed 3 × 10 reps (Total = 30 reps, 30s inter-set rest) of unilateral leg press exercise at 70% 1RM. Perceived exertion (RPE), muscle pain, knee pain and pre- and 5-min post-exercise blood pressure were measured.ResultsRPE was higher in ACLR-BFR compared to NI-BFR (p < 0.05). Muscle pain was higher in NI-BFR and ACLR-BFR compared to ACLR-HL (p < 0.05). Knee pain was lower in ACLR-BFR compared to ACLR-HL (p < 0.01). There were no differences in blood pressure.ConclusionThese responses to BFR exercise may not limit application and favourably influence knee pain throughout ACLR rehabilitation training programmes. These findings can help inform practitioners' decisions to utilise this tool.     

Side-to-side asymmetries in landing mechanics from a drop vertical jump test are not related to asymmetries in knee joint laxity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Asymmetries in knee joint biomechanics and increased knee joint laxity in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are considered risk factors for re-tear or early onset of osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, the relationship between these factors has not been established. The aim of the study was to compare knee mechanics during landing from a bilateral drop vertical jump in patients following ACLR and control participants and to study the relationship between side-to-side asymmetries in landing mechanics and knee joint laxity.

Methods

Seventeen patients following ACLR were evaluated and compared to 28 healthy controls. Knee sagittal and frontal plane kinematics and kinetics were evaluated using three-dimensional motion capture (200 Hz) and two synchronized force platforms (1000 Hz). Static anterior and internal rotation knee laxities were measured for both groups and legs using dedicated arthrometers. Group and leg differences were investigated using a mixed model analysis of variance. The relationship between side-to-side differences in sagittal knee power/energy absorption and knee joint laxities was evaluated using univariate linear regression.

Results

A significant group-by-leg interaction (p = 0.010) was found for knee sagittal plane energy absorption, with patients having 25% lower values in their involved compared to their non-involved leg (1.22 ± 0.39 vs. 1.62 ± 0.40 J kg^?1). Furthermore, knee sagittal plane energy absorption was 18% lower at their involved leg compared to controls (p = 0.018). Concomitantly, patients demonstrated a 27% higher anterior laxity of the involved knee compared to the non-involved knee, with an average side-to-side difference of 1.2 mm (p < 0.001). Laxity of the involved knee was also 30% higher than that of controls (p < 0.001) (leg-by-group interaction: p = 0.002). No relationship was found between sagittal plane energy absorption and knee laxity.

Conclusions

Nine months following surgery, ACLR patients were shown to employ a knee unloading strategy of their involved leg during bilateral landing. However, this strategy was unrelated to their increased anterior knee laxity. Side-to-side asymmetries during simple bilateral landing tasks may put ACLR patients at increased risk of second ACL injury or early-onset osteoarthritis development. Detecting and correcting asymmetric landing strategies is highly relevant in the framework of personalized rehabilitation, which calls for complex biomechanical analyses to be applied in clinical routine.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Neuroplastic changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients from neuromechanical decoupling

The purpose of this study was to identify how the brain simultaneously perceives proprioceptive input during joint loading in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients, when compared to healthy controls. Seventeen ACLR patients (ACLR) and seventeen controls (CONT) were tested for the somatosensory cortical activation using electroencephalography (EEG) while measuring knee laxity using a knee arthrometer. The relationship between cortical activation and joint laxity within group was also examined. The ACLR patients had increased cortical activation (36.4% ± 11.5%) in the somatosensory cortex during early loading (ERD1) to the injured limb compared to the CONT's matched limb (25.3% ± 13.2%, P = 0.013) as well as compared to the noninjured limb (25.1% ± 14.2%, P = 0.001). Higher somatosensory cortical activity during midloading (ERD2) to the ACLR knee positively correlated with knee laxity (mm) during early loading (LAX1, r = 0.530), midloading (LAX2, r = 0.506), total anterior loading (LAXA, r = 0.543), and total antero‐posterior loading (LAXT, r = 0.501), while the noninjured limb revealed negative correlations between ERD1 and LAXA (r = ?0.534) as well as between ERD2 and LAX2 (r = ?0.565). ACLR patients demonstrate greater brain activation during joint loading in the injured knees when compared to healthy controls’ matched knees as well as contralateral healthy knees, while the CONT group shows similar brain activation patterns during joint loading between limbs. These different neural activation strategies may indicate neuromechanical decoupling following an ACL reconstruction and evidence of altered sensorimotor perception and control of the knee (neuroplasticity), which may be critical to address after surgery for optimal neuromuscular control and patients’ outcomes.     

Open and closed kinetic chain exercises in the early period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Improvements in level walking, stair ascent, and stair descent

Thirty-seven patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were tested in a gait analysis laboratory at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. Between test sessions, patients were randomly assigned to a course of either closed or open kinetic chain resistance exercises (3 sessions per week for 4 weeks). Gait analysis consisted of bilateral calculations of knee joint angle, moment, and power during level walking, stair ascent, and stair descent. An analysis of variance on the effects of training group and test session indicated that the only variable to be significantly affected by the type of exercise program was the amount of knee flexion at the beginning of step-up (P < 0.05). All other measures of knee angle, moment, and power (16 total variables) showed no significant difference between the exercise groups. All variables measured on the injured side showed significant improvement from test 1 to test 2 (P < 0.05), but the injured leg remained functionally deficient when compared with the uninjured leg. These data suggest that there are no clinically significant differences in the functional improvement resulting from the choice of open or closed kinetic chain exercises in the early period after this surgery.     

Does meniscal pathology alter gait knee biomechanics and strength post-ACL reconstruction?

Purpose

Individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with concomitant meniscal pathology have a higher risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared to those with isolated ACLR. Knee extensor weakness and altered dynamic knee joint biomechanics have been suggested to play a role in the development of knee OA following ACLR. This study investigated whether these factors differ in people following ACLR who have concomitant meniscal pathology compared to patients with isolated ACLR.

Methods

Thirty-three patients with isolated ACLR and 34 patients with ACLR and meniscal pathology underwent strength and gait assessment 12–24 months post-operatively. Primary measures were peak isometric knee extensor torque and knee adduction moment (peak and impulse). Secondary measures included peak knee flexion moment and knee kinematics (sagittal and transverse).

Results

There were no between-group differences in knee extensor strength [mean difference (95 % CI) 0.09 (?0.23 to 0.42) Nm/kg, n.s.], peak knee adduction moment [?0.02 (?0.54 to 0.49) Nm/(BW × HT) %, n.s.] or knee adduction moment impulse [0.01 (?0.15 to 0.17) Nm/(BW × HT) %, p = n.s.]. No between-group differences were found for any secondary measures.

Conclusions

No evidence was found to suggest that the higher prevalence of OA in patients with ACLR and meniscal pathology compared to patients with isolated ACLR is attributed to reduced knee muscle strength or altered knee joint biomechanics assessed 1–2 years post-surgery. Given that there is a higher incidence of knee OA in patients with concomitant meniscal pathology and ACLR, further investigation is needed so that population-specific rehabilitation protocols can be developed.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Quantitative evaluation of knee instability and muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar and quadriceps tendon.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autologous graft harvested from the central one-third of the patellar and quadriceps tendon was performed in 65 knees of 65 patients who were followed from 3 to 7 years. Mean anterior laxity of both knees was measured before and after surgery in each patient using the Styker Knee Laxity Tester. At 30 degrees of knee flexion, 58 patients (89%) had differences of less than 2.5 mm between the operated and unoperated knees. Quadriceps strength was measured with the Cybex II and was less than 50% of the uninjured knee at 3 months after surgery. In men, quadriceps strength returned to 78% of normal at 1 year and 85% at final followup. These values were equal to the preoperative level. In women, the quadriceps strength at final followup was 70%, significantly lower than preoperative strength. Hamstring strength recovered to equal the normal strength. Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using one-third of the patellar and quadriceps tendon achieves stability, postoperative quadriceps weakness is a disadvantage. This weakness may be caused by impairment of the knee extensor mechanism resulting from harvesting the graft. We do not currently recommend this technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.     

Change in knee kinematics during gait after eccentric isokinetic training for quadriceps in subjects submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is of interest in studies evaluating the effect of training programs. Many studies have addressed knee flexion/extension but not valgus/varus movements. Considering that joint stability is a major concern in ACL reconstruction surgery, movements occurring in the frontal plane of the knee also deserve attention. Knee extensor torque was analyzed by an isokinetic dynamometer and the angular amplitudes and velocities of flexion/extension and valgus/varus movements were analyzed by goniometry during gait 9 months after ACL reconstruction. The analysis was repeated after 3 months of eccentric isokinetic training of the quadriceps in five patients. The gait pattern was also recorded for 10 healthy controls. The knee extensor torque and flexion/extension range of movement during gait increased significantly after training. However, an unexpectedly increased valgus, most pronounced during the swing phase, which may imply adverse effects on the knee, was also observed in the ACL reconstructed knee. The recorded valgus angles may however be overestimated due to crosstalk. Thus, the extent of the increased valgus, as well as the mechanisms involved and the functional and clinical implications, need clarification before eccentric training after ACL reconstruction can be generally recommended.     

Bilateral changes in knee joint laxity during the first year after non-surgically treated anterior cruciate ligament injury

ObjectivesAnalyse changes in knee laxity between 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after non-surgically treated ACL injury and to analyse associations between knee laxity and knee function, self-reported knee stability, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), fear and confidence at different timepoints during recovery.DesignProspective cohort study.Participants125 patients (67 males, mean age 25.0 ± 7.0 years) with acute ACL injury.Main outcomeLaxity was measured using KT-1000 arthrometer. Self-reported knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF). Confidence and fear were assessed with questions from the ACL-RSI scale. Subjectively knee stability was assessed using SANE.ResultsKnee laxity increased bilaterally from 3 to 12 months, and in the non-involved knee from 3 to 24 months (p˂0.05), although mean change was below 1 mm. Side-to-side difference in knee laxity was correlated with IKDC-SKF (r = −0.283) and knee stability in rehabilitation/sport activities (r = −0.315) at 6 months, but not with confidence/fear.ConclusionKnee laxity increased bilaterally during the first year after non-surgically treated ACL injury, though, the mean change in knee laxity was below 1 mm and the clinical significance is unknown. Knee laxity was weakly associated with knee function and perceived knee stability.Level of evidenceLevel IITrial registrationNCT02931084     

Changes in gait pattern and early functional results after ACL repair are comparable to those of ACL reconstruction

Purpose

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) has been introduced as a new technique to repair the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to restore knee joint kinematics after an acute ACL tear. Aim of the present study was to compare the early post-operative activity, restoration of gait pattern and functional results after DIS in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for acute ACL tears. It was hypothesized that functional results, post-operative activity and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those after ACLR.

Methods

Sixty patients with acute ACL tears were included in this study and underwent either DIS or ACLR with an anatomic semitendinosus autograft in a randomized manner. Patients were equipped with an accelerometric step counter for the first 6 weeks after surgery in order to monitor their early post-operative activity. 3D gait analysis was performed at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic parameters were extracted and averaged for each subject. Functional results were recorded at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery using the Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score and Lysholm score.

Results

Patients who underwent DIS showed an increased early post-operative activity with significant differences at week 2 and 3 (p = 0.0241 and 0.0220). No significant differences between groups were found for knee kinematic and kinetic parameters or the functional scores at any time of the follow-up. Furthermore, the difference in anterior tibial translation was not significantly different between the two groups (n.s.).

Conclusion

Early functional results and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those of primary ACLR. Therefore, ACL repair may be an alternative to ACLR in this cohort of patients.

Level of evidence

I.

     

The effects of compressive load and knee joint torque on peak anterior cruciate ligament strains

BACKGROUND: High graft strains incurred during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may be minimized if an external compressive load is simultaneously applied to the joint during closed kinetic chain exercises. HYPOTHESES: Peak anterior cruciate ligament strains will 1). increase with an increase in resistance torque during an exercise that involves concentric contraction of the extensor mechanism, 2). decrease with an increase in resistance torque during an exercise that involves concentric contraction of the flexors, and 3). decrease when an external compressive load is applied to the knee during both exercises relative to the no external compressive load condition. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Strains in the anteromedial bundle were measured in 10 subjects with normal ligaments. Flexor and extensor exercises were performed against controlled resistance torques with and without a compressive load applied to the foot. RESULTS: An increase in resistance produced an increase in peak anterior cruciate ligament strain for the extensor exercise with no compressive load applied. During the flexor exercise without a compressive load, an increase in resistance produced a decrease in peak strains. During the extensor exercise, the peak anterior cruciate ligament strain was not reduced with the application of the external compressive force. CONCLUSIONS: Extensor and flexor exercises that incorporate an external compressive load do not shield the anterior cruciate ligament from strain. However, no additional increase in strain occurs with an increase in resistance when the external compressive load is applied. Thus, it may be possible to increase the activity of the quadriceps muscles without increasing the strain by applying a compressive load (as with closed kinetic chain exercises).     

Joint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autografts.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze ligamentous stability and isokinetic strength of knee extensor and flexor muscles after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 2 different autografts with identical fixation. DESIGN: This study implements a comparative case series design. SETTING: Schulthess Clinic, Switzerland. PATIENTS: A total of 153 consecutive patients (n = 87 bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB]/66 quadruple semitendinosus/gracilis tendons [QSGT] patients) who underwent BPTB and QSGT surgery were functionally assessed. INTERVENTION: All patients were functionally assessed (knee extension/flexion isokinetic strength and knee joint laxity) at a mean follow-up time of 11 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Laxity was measured utilizing the Kneelax arthrometer, whereas isokinetic strength of the knee extensor/flexor muscle groups was measured using the Biodex Multi Joint System 2 (180 degrees/s and 300 degrees/s). RESULTS: The QSGT group had significantly greater knee joint laxity when compared with the BPTB group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, females in the QSGT group demonstrated the greatest knee joint laxity overall (P < 0.001). Additionally, a significant flexor torque deficiency was demonstrated in the QSGT group (P < 0.001); however, no differences in extensor torque were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a BPTB autograft achieved better knee joint stability as well as greater knee flexor torque than the QSGT autograft. Both grafts exhibited a similar knee extensor torque deficit, indicating that only quadriceps strength is not graft-dependent.