The effects of grass pollen allergoid immunotherapy on clinical and immunological parameters in children with allergic rhinitis

Allergoid immunotherapy is a new form of allergen immunotherapy allowing safe administration of high allergen doses. There is limited information on the effects of allergoid immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis. To investigate the immunological and clinical effects of allergoid immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis due to grass pollen allergy. Children with allergic rhinitis were assigned to allergoid immunotherapy (n = 27) or control (n = 26, no immunotherapy) groups. Children in the immunotherapy group received seven injections of grass pollen allergoid immunotherapy before grass pollen season and continued to receive maintenance immunotherapy for 27 months. All patients were offered a pharmacotherapy regimen to be used on demand during the pollen seasons. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between the immunotherapy and control groups. The rhinoconjunctivitis symptom-medication score and asthma symptom score were lower in the immunotherapy group after 1 yr of maintenance immunotherapy (p < 0.01 for both). Skin test reactivity and nasal reactivity as determined by nasal provocation testing for grass pollen were significantly decreased after 1 yr of immunotherapy (p < 0.001 for both). The seasonal increase in bronchial reactivity and nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein levels were prevented after the first year of immunotherapy (p < 0.05 for both). The seasonal increase in immunoglobulin (Ig)E decreased (p < 0.05) and grass-specific IgG, IgG(1) and IgG(4) increased significantly already at the end of the seven-injection build-up therapy (p < 0.001, for all). Interleukin (IL)-4 levels in the culture supernatants showed a steady decline from baseline at first and second year of immunotherapy (p < 0.001) but remained unchanged in the control group. Allergoid immunotherapy is an effective method in the treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in children and prevents the seasonal increase in bronchial hyper-reactivity. Changes in specific IgE and IgG levels and decreased IL-4 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture supernatants may account for the observed clinical effects.     

Efficacy of pollen immunotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of subcutaneous pollen immunotherapy has been documented in published double-blind, placebo-controlled studies related to treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In the present study, subjective (symptom scores) and objective (nasal peak inspiratory flow, nasal smear, nasal biopsy) parameters were used to study the efficacy of pollen immunotherapy. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (32 male), mean +/- SE age 13.6 +/- 2.8 years allergic to grass-pollen participated in the present study. Patients were divided into three groups: group I, 24 patients who did not receive pollen immunotherapy; group II, 12 patients who received the build-up phase of pollen immunotherapy; and group III, 12 patients who had just finished pollen immunotherapy. With regard to objective and subjective parameters these three groups were compared. RESULTS: When group I was compared to groups II and III, the patients who had not received any immunotherapy were found to have a high daytime nasal symptoms score (P < 0.01), high daytime eye symptoms score(P < 0.01) and high night-time symptoms score (P < 0.01). In objective parameters, it was found that group I had low nasal peak inspiratory flow (P < 0.05), and a high eosinophil count in nasal smears (P < 0.05) and peripheral blood (P < 0.05). It was also demonstrated that there was an increased eosinophil infiltration (P < 0.01) and mast cell infiltration (P < 0.05) in nasal biopsy in group I. There was no significant difference between group II and group III according to these results (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy leads to a better clinical and histopathological prognosis in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Clinical and immunological response to oral and subcutaneous immunotherapy with grass pollen extracts

Forty children allergic to grass pollen were divided into two groups, and matched by their serum IgE antibody concentrations to grasses. For two preseasonal treatment periods one group received immunotherapy with an alum adsorbed grass pollen extract, while the second group was treated orally with an aqueous extract of the same allergens.The patients' postseasonal self evaluation as well as the mean symptom scores calculated from symptom diaries indicate, that oral treatment is significantly less effective in controlling seasonal allergic symptoms than subcutaneous immunotherapy. During oral treatment neither an increase of specific serum IgG antibodies, nor a suppression of the seasonal increase in specific serum IgE antibodies could be demonstrated.     

Sublingual immunotherapy for pediatric allergic rhinitis: The clinical evidence

Allergic rhinitis is estimated to affect 10%-20% of pediatric population and it is caused by the IgE-sensitization to environmental allergens, most importantly grass pollens and house dust mites. Allergic rhinitis can influence patient’s daily activity severely and may precede the development of asthma, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated correctly. In addition to subcutaneous immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) represents the only treatment being potentially able to cure allergic respiratory diseases, by modulating the immune system activity. This review clearly summarizes and analyzes the available randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials, which aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and the safety of grass pollen and house dust mite SLIT for the specific treatment of pediatric allergic rhinitis. Our analysis demonstrates the good evidence supporting the efficacy of SLIT for allergic rhinitis to grass pollens in children, whereas trials regarding pediatric allergic rhinitis to house dust mites present lower quality, although several studies supported its usefulness.     

Allergic conjunctivitis in children with asthma, rhinitis and eczema in a secondary outpatient clinic

Little evidence is available on the prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis in pediatric populations. The objective of this study was to assess the cumulative prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis in children with rhinitis, asthma and eczema in a secondary pediatric outpatient clinic. Children aged 5-15 yr referred during the period of 2002-2004 in whom allergic conjunctivitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis or eczema was diagnosed were included in a retrospective survey. At referral patient characteristics, history, symptoms, signs and results of type 1 allergy tests were entered into an electronic form. Four hundred and fifty-eight children with a mean age of 9.4 yr were studied. Of 316, 324 and 149 children with rhinitis, asthma or eczema, respectively, 133 (42%), 78 (24%) and 45 (30%) had concomitant allergic conjunctivitis. One hundred and thirty-seven (30%) had allergic conjunctivitis, of whom 133 (97%) also had allergic rhinitis, 77 (56%) asthma and 45 (33%) eczema. One hundred and twenty-five (91%) of the children with allergic conjunctivitis had positive allergy tests to one or more allergens, sensitization to house dust mites being more frequent in chronic allergic conjunctivitis than in acute allergic conjunctivitis (95% vs. 53%; p < 0.01). Sensitization to grass was more frequent in children with acute allergic conjunctivitis (78% vs. 57%; p = 0.03). In a secondary pediatric outpatient clinic allergic conjunctivitis is a frequent co-morbidity to allergic rhinitis and to asthma and eczema. Allergic conjunctivitis need to be included as an important co-morbidity in future guidelines on asthma, rhinitis and eczema management.     

Urinary leukotriene E4 levels in children with allergic rhinitis treated with specific immunotherapy and anti-IgE (Omalizumab)

Recently, we were able to demonstrate that Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, reduces in vitro leukotriene (LT) release of peripheral leukocytes stimulated with allergen in children with allergic rhinitis undergoing allergen immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of anti-IgE in combination with specific immunotherapy (SIT) on urinary leukotriene E₄ (LTE₄) levels. Children and adolescents with sensitization to birch and grass pollens and suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis were included in a phase III, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study. Within the four-arm study, patients were randomized to receive SIT for either birch or grass pollen and to receive either subcutaneous anti-IgE or placebo for 24 weeks during the pollen season. From a total population of 225 children, we collected three urine samples in a subgroup of 19 children [n = 12 boys (63%); mean age 11.8 years; range 7.2–17.5 years; Group A (n = 10): SIT (grass or birch) + anti-IgE; Group B (n = 9): SIT (grass or birch) + placebo]. Urine samples were collected before, during and at the end of treatment. Endogenous urinary LTE₄ was separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and determined by enzyme immunoassay with a specific antibody. No differences in urinary LTE₄ concentrations were observed between the anti-IgE and the placebo groups before (A: 35.2; B: 36.5 nmol/mol creatinine), during (A: 27.0; B: 29.3) and after treatment (A: 28.9; B: 26.5 nmol/mol creatinine). We conclude that urinary LTE₄ levels are not helpful in monitoring patients treated with anti-IgE and SIT.     

舌下含服粉尘螨滴剂治疗支气管哮喘伴变应性鼻炎的疗效

目的 探讨舌下含服粉尘螨滴剂特异性免疫治疗支气管哮喘(哮喘)伴变应性鼻炎的疗效及安全性.方法 选取516例年龄4～13岁哮喘伴变应性鼻炎患儿.其中291例完成1 a舌下免疫治疗(免疫治疗组),非免疫治疗对照组225例.患儿均完成10种常见变应原皮肤点刺试验,点刺试验结果呈阳性反应.免疫治疗组根据皮肤点刺试验结果分尘螨过敏组80例、尘螨及蟑螂过敏组71例、尘螨及花粉过敏组74例、尘螨及狗毛过敏组66例.应用粉尘螨滴剂进行临床免疫治疗,记录治疗前后哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)评分、鼻炎症状评分、用药情况和不良反应.结果 1.治疗12个月后,免疫治疗组和非免疫治疗对照组ACQ评分分别为(0.28±0.33)分和(1.07±0.68)分,与治疗前[(1.76±0.75)分和(1.55±0.62)分]比较,分别下降了(74.03±37.66)%和(29.32±44.53)%,2组ACQ评分比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-154.109,P<0.000 1).2.治疗12个月,免疫治疗组和非免疫治疗对照组鼻炎症状评分分别为(0.337±0.479)分和(0.560±0.634)分,较治疗前[(0.899±0.667)分和(0.892±0.688)分]分别有70.8%和39.1%的患儿评分级别降低,2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=51.949,P<0.000 1).3.治疗12个月,免疫治疗组和非免疫治疗对照组治疗哮喘月均用药评分分别为(20.91±18.03)分 和(85.22±47.84)分,与治疗初始月均用药评分[(113.41±35.02)分和(108.86±35.24)分]比较,分别下降了(75.10±28.80)%和(20.60±39.52)%.4.治疗12个月,免疫治疗组肺功能呼气峰流速(预计值百分比)[(91.38±8.82)%]较治疗前上升(8.84±9.64)%.5.免疫治疗结束,免疫治疗组粉尘螨试验阳性级别降低,与非免疫治疗对照组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=70.850,P<0.000 1).6.各免疫治疗亚组ACQ评分、月均用药评分和粉尘螨皮试阳性级别降低的差异均无统计学意义.7.与用药相关的皮疹、鼻咽痒和哮喘发作不良反应发生率为24.7%,未出现过敏性休克等严重不良反应.结论 特应性舌下免疫治疗方法安全有效,是治疗儿童哮喘伴变应性鼻炎的重要措施之一.     

A 10-year prognosis for childhood allergic rhinitis

The prognosis of allergic rhinitis was studied in 154 children aged 3-17 years at diagnosis by means of a detailed questionnaire administered 8-11 years later. The symptoms had completely disappeared in only 15 (10%) patients. The conjunctival symptoms, however, had disappeared or were controlled successfully by topical drug therapy in almost all, and 77 (50%) were managing without medication for allergic rhinitis. Twenty-five (23%) of the 110 children with seasonal allergic rhinitis had a perennial disease at follow-up, in contrast to seven (16%) of 44 with perennial allergic rhinitis originally who had only seasonal symptoms at follow-up. Asthma or wheezing had developed in 29 cases (19%) and was more common (p less than 0.01) among those with perennial allergic rhinitis (15 of 44) than among those with seasonal allergic rhinitis (14 of 110). No significant association was found between age at onset of symptoms, family history of atopic disease or type of treatment for allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinitis still present at follow-up or development of asthma during the observation period.     

New visions in specific immunotherapy in children: an iPAC summary and future trends

Specific immunotherapy is indicated for confirmed immunoglobulin E-mediated airway diseases using standardized allergen products with documented clinical efficacy and safety. For decades the subcutaneous route of administration (SCIT) has been the gold standard. Recently, the sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has also been investigated in children. SCIT, especially with grass and birch pollens but also house dust mites, is an effective treatment in children with allergic rhinitis and asthma when a significant part of their symptoms are caused by these allergens. A long-term effect up to 12 yr after discontinuation of SCIT with timothy allergen has been shown. Efficacy and safety of SLIT in pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis have been demonstrated in adults. The evidence in children is a little less convincing, and more data is needed. The clinical relevance, long-term results and the size of the effect, as well as the dose, the treatment regimen and duration has not been sufficiently elaborated. It is demonstrated that SCIT has the potential for preventing the development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Also one randomized study indicates a preventive effect of SLIT in children on the development of asthma. At present, there are no studies who clearly demonstrates either a long-term effect or a preventive effect on the development of asthma of SLIT in children. The areas with lack of evidence should be addressed in well performed prospective, randomized long-term studies both with SCIT and SLIT. This review was initiated by iPAC (international Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Consortium) and aims to review current knowledge related to specific immunotherapy in childhood, and to identify needs for future research in this field.     

Five‐grass pollen 300IR SLIT tablets: efficacy and safety in children and adolescents

Halken S, Agertoft L, Seidenberg J, Bauer C‐P, Payot F, Martin‐Muñoz MF, Bartkowiak‐Emeryk M, Vereda A, Jean‐Alphonse S, Melac M, Le Gall M, Wahn U. Five‐grass pollen 300IR SLIT tablets: efficacy and safety in children and adolescents.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2010: 21: 970–976.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S The efficacy and safety of five‐grass pollen 300IR sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets (Stallergènes SA, France) have previously been demonstrated in paediatric patients. This report presents additional data concerning efficacy at pollen peak, efficacy and safety according to age, nasal and ocular symptoms, use of rescue medication, satisfaction with treatment and compliance. Children (5–11 yr) and adolescents (12–17 yr) with grass pollen–allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were included in a multinational, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study and received either a 300IR five‐grass pollen tablet or placebo daily in a pre‐ (4 months) and co‐seasonal protocol. The severity of six symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion, nasal and ocular pruritis, and tearing) was scored, and rescue medication use was recorded daily during the pollen season. Patient satisfaction was recorded at the season end. A total of 161 children and 117 adolescents were evaluated (n = 267). 300IR SLIT was effective over the whole season (p = 0.0010) and at the pollen peak (p = 0.0009). The adjusted mean difference between 300IR and placebo groups was significant for both nasal (p = 0.0183) and ocular (p < 0.0001) symptoms. Rescue medication use was statistically lower in the SLIT group during the pollen season and at the pollen peak (both p < 0.05). More patients in the SLIT group were satisfied with their treatment compared to placebo (83.2% vs. 68.1%, p = 0.0030), and compliance was high (SLIT 93.9% of patients were compliant, placebo 94.8% of patients were compliant). SLIT was well tolerated by children and adolescents. 300IR five‐grass pollen tablets are effective and safe during the pollen season and at the pollen peak in children and adolescents with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis.     

Allergic rhinitis in children

Allergic rhinitis affects up to 40% of children but is commonly undiagnosed. Careful assessment of nasal symptoms allows for the most appropriate therapeutic options to be chosen. Allergen avoidance is often difficult in practice. Antihistamines are of limited benefit in allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mite and other perennial allergens, where symptoms, predominantly nasal obstruction, are not histamine mediated. In contrast, symptoms triggered by pollen, such as nasal itch, rhinorrhoea and sneezing, are relieved by antihistamines. Intranasal steroids are the treatment of choice for persistent moderate–severe allergic rhinitis and are more effective than antihistamines for relief of nasal obstruction. Failure to respond to intranasal medications is often caused by poor compliance or inefficient use of nasal sprays. Immunotherapy may be a useful, if expensive, option, particularly where symptoms are because of a specific pollen. The benefits of immunotherapy in house dust mite‐induced rhinitis and asthma remain controversial.     

Hypersaline nasal irrigation in children with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis: A randomized study

Recent evidence suggests that nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline may be useful as an adjunctive treatment modality in the management of many sinonasal diseases. However, no previous studies have investigated the efficacy of this regimen in the prevention of seasonal allergic rhinitis-related symptoms in the pediatric patient. Twenty children with seasonal allergic rhinitis to Parietaria were enrolled in the study. Ten children were randomized to receive three-times daily nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline for the entire pollen season, which had lasted 6 weeks. Ten patients were allocated to receive no nasal irrigation and were used as controls. A mean daily rhinitis score based on the presence of nasal itching, rhinorrea, nasal obstruction and sneezing was calculated for each week of the pollen season. Moreover, patients were allowed to use oral antihistamines when required and the mean number of drug assumption per week was also calculated. In patients allocated to nasal irrigation, the mean daily rhinitis score was reduced during 5 weeks of the study period. This reduction was statistically significantly different in the 3th, 4th and 5th week of therapy. Moreover, a decreased consumption of oral antihistamines was observed in these patients. This effect became evident after the second week of treatment and resulted in statistically significant differences during the 3th, 4th and 6th week. This study supports the use of nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline in the pediatric patient with seasonal allergic rhinitis during the pollen season. This treatment was tolerable, inexpensive and effective.     

Do the leukotriene receptor antagonists work in children with grass pollen‐induced allergic rhinitis?

Although cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonists were recently approved for use in allergic rhinitis (AR), there has been no study to date investigating their application in children. The aim was to evaluate whether montelukast provides any benefit in nasal allergen challenge-induced symptoms in children, and whether it could improve the control provided by an antihistamine during pollen season. Two randomized studies, one a double-blind, placebo-controlled, nasal allergen challenge study and one an open-label, cross-over, parallel-group clinical study, were performed in 18 (11.7+/-0.7 years) and 32 children (10.5+/-0.5 years), respectively, with grass pollen allergy. In the first study, the effect of a single dose of montelukast and its combination with loratadine were compared with placebo on nasal responses induced by allergen challenge. In the second study, the additive effect of montelukast to loratadine was tested in an open-label cross-over clinical study. In the challenge study, early-phase and late-phase nasal reactions peaked at 15 min and 4 h after the challenge respectively. During the early phase, combination improved total nasal symptoms (p=0.004) during the first hour and sneezing (p=0.012) at 15 min compared with placebo group. During the late phase, montelukast (p=0.017) and combination (p=0.011) caused less nasal obstruction at 4 h and combination caused less sneezing at 6 h (p=0.015). In the clinical trial, montelukast provided protection on seasonal increase in pulmonary symptoms [0 (0, 14) vs. 6.5 (0, 27.7); p=0.016] and on the decrease in FEF25-75 [-0.09 (-0.34, 0.17) vs. -0.28 (-0.66, 0.02); p=0.002]. However, there was no improvement in nasal symptoms and flows. Although we showed protection against nasal challenge-induced congestion with montelukast, we were not able to show the same in the clinical study possibly because of low pollen counts and mildness of the symptoms of the patients with AR. However, montelukast provided better control of pulmonary symptoms and protection from seasonal decrease in lung function, indicating its potential therapeutic benefit in children with AR.     

Allergen specific sublingual immunotherapy in children with asthma and allergic rhinitis

Background

The incidence of asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) is significantly increased, especially in younger children. Current treatment for children with asthma and allergic rhinitis include allergen avoidance, standard pharmacotherapy, and immunotherapy. Since standard pharmacotherapy is prescribed for symptoms, immunotherapy at present plays an important role in the treatment of allergic diseases. This article presents insights into the up-to-date understanding of immunotherapy in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Data sources

PubMed articles published from 1990 to 2014 were reviewed using the MeSH terms "asthma", "allergic rhinitis", "children", and "immune therapy". Additional articles were identified by hand searching of the references in the initial search.

Results

Numerous studies have shown that sublingual application of allergen specific immunotherapy (SLIT) is an adequate, safe and efficient substitution to subcutaneous route of allergens administration (SCIT) in the treatment of IgE-mediated respiratory tract allergies in children. According to the literature, better clinical efficacy is connected with the duration of treatment and mono sensitized patients.

Conclusions

At least 3 years of treatment and stable asthma before the immunotherapy are positive predictors of good clinical efficacy and tolerability of SLIT. SLIT reduces the symptoms of allergic diseases and the use of medicaments, and improves the quality of life of children with the diseases.

     

Systemic reactions to specific immunotherapy in children with respiratory allergy: a prospective study

The aim of this multi-centre prospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of systemic reactions to specific immunotherapy in children with allergic asthma and or rhinitis. One thousand and fifty-six children (653 boys and 403 girls), median age 8.5 years, were enrolled in this three-year prospective study. All the children were treated with injections of the following allergenic extracts: 689 of house dust mite, 291 of grass, 109 of Parietaria, 13 of Alternaria, 6 of Artemisia and 11 of Olea. Among 1056 treated children, 41 (3, 7%) had systemic reactions: 40 children (3.7%) experienced mild symptoms such as asthma and/or urticaria, and only one shock (0.08%). A total of 47, 247 injections were administered, and the rate of systemic reactions, according to the number of total injections was only 0.08%. According to the allergenic extract, systemic reactions occurred in 29/689 children (4.2%) treated with house dust mites extract (0.09% of the injections), in 9/291 children (3.1%) treated with grass extract (0.07% of the injections) and in 3/109 children (2.8%) treated with Parietaria extract (0.06% of the injections). The prevalence of systemic reactions was significantly higher (p< 0.0001) in the children treated with house dust mite extract in comparison with those treated with pollen extracts. All the systemic reactions appeared within 30 minutes following the administration of the extract and occurred in 37/41 cases (90.2%) with the same dose, previously tolerated. Most reactions were mild, and were readily controlled by immediate emergency treatment. There was no need for hospitalization. The low prevalence of systemic reactions (0.08% of the total injections and 3.7% of the total treated, indicates that specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens is safe in children with respiratory allergic diseases.;     

标准化屋尘螨变应原特异性免疫治疗对儿童变应性鼻炎合并哮喘的临床疗效

目的 评估标准化屋尘螨变应原特异性免疫治疗(specific immunotherapy,SIT)对儿童变应性鼻炎合并哮喘的临床疗效.方法 选择我院42例接受标准化屋尘螨SIT的变应性鼻炎合并哮喘儿童为研究对象.所有患儿治疗前、治疗1年后均进行变应原皮肤点刺试验、测定血清屋尘螨和粉尘螨特异性IgE水平、进行肺功能测定和自觉症状评分.结果 治疗1年后屋尘螨和粉尘螨的皮肤指数和自觉症状评分均较治疗前显著降低(P＜0.01,P＜0.05),而治疗前后屋尘螨和粉尘螨特异性IgE水平、肺功能(肺活量、第1秒用力呼气量、最大呼气中段流量)均无明显变化(P＞0.05).结论 变应性鼻炎合并哮喘儿童给予SIT1年后其皮肤敏感性显著改善,临床症状明显好转,但对气道炎症的影响有待于进一步的观察.     

Validation of a rhinitis symptom questionnaire (ISAAC core questions) in a population of Swiss school children visiting the school health services

The primary aim of the study was to assess the validity of the ISAAC core questions on rhinitis in a population of Swiss school children by comparing them to skin prick test results. Second, the positive predictive value in detecting atopy among children with rhinitis symptoms was determined. Third, agreement between parental reports of hay fever and rhinitis symptoms was evaluated, since earlier Swiss prevalence surveys had exclusively relied on reported hay fever. Material and methods: Two thousand nine hundred and fifty-four (81. 2%) parents of 7, 10 and 14-year old children filled in an exhaustive questionnaire which included the ISAAC core questions on rhinitis. Two thousand one hundred and twenty children also underwent skin prick testing against six common aeroallergens (grass mixture, birch, mugwort, D. pteronyssinus, cat and dog dander). The analysis is restricted to children with both questionnaire data and skin prick test results. Results: Sensitization to any allergen was most strongly associated with reported hay fever (OR = 5. 7, 95% CI 4. 4—7. 4), nose problems accompanied by itchy-watery eyes (OR = 4. 4, 95% CI: 3. 3—5. 7), symptoms occurring only during pollen season (March through September) (OR = 4. 9, 95% CI: 3. 6–6. 5) and a combination of these latter two symptoms (OR = 5. 8, 95% CI: 4. 1—8. 1). The association was stronger for a sensitization to outdoor allergens than for indoor allergens. The specificity of the various questions was high, ranging from 77. 5% to 97. 6%, but the sensitivity was low (2. 6% to 42. 7%). The positive predictive value for atopy among children with symptoms was 63% for sneezing accompanied by itchy-watery eyes, 67% for symptoms occurring only during the pollen season and 70% for reported hay fever. However, agreement between reptirted rhinitis symptoms and hay fever was only moderate. About one third of the children with symptoms indicative of seasonal rhinitis did not report the label “hay fever”. Conclusions: We conclude from our analyses that the ISAAC core questions on rhinitis are highly specific and therefore useful in excluding atopy. In addition they have a high positive predictive value in detecting atopy among children with symptoms, but they are not helpful for detecting atopy in a general population of children (low sensitivity). To monitor time trends in the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in Switzerland, questions on rhinitis symptoms as well as on the diagnostic label “hay fever” have to be included in a questionnaire because they contain complementary information since under-diagnosis of allergic rhinitis is common.     

�۳����������������Ʊ�Ӧ�������ϲ����� ��Ч���ۼ������ڼ䲡�鷴��ԭ�����

目的 探讨特异性免疫治疗变应性哮喘合并鼻炎的效果,分析特异性免疫治疗期间病情反复的原因。方法 将上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院2006年1月至2010年12月期间收治的102例变应性哮喘合并鼻炎的患儿,分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组78例在哮喘规范化防治基础上联合粉尘螨注射液特异性免疫治疗,而对照组24例以吸入激素等规范化防治为主。评价两组患儿治疗6个月、1年、2年及治疗结束后随访1年哮喘最大呼气流量(PEF)、汉化版儿童哮喘控制测试量表(Ch-CACT)结果和变应性鼻炎的临床症状评分及视觉模拟评分(VAS),比较两组患儿治疗第2年及治疗结束后随访1年哮喘急性发作次数和呼吸道感染情况,并分析特异性免疫治疗期间病情反复的原因。结果 治疗第2年及治疗结束后随访1年哮喘急性发作次数和呼吸道感染次数均较对照组减少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组治疗2年及治疗结束后随访1年哮喘PEF测定结果优于对照组,治疗结束后随访1年Ch-CACT较对照组高,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗6个月、1年、2年及治疗结束后随访1年治疗组变应性鼻炎的临床症状评分和VAS评分优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。特异性免疫治疗期间导致病情反复的常见原因为气候因素、呼吸道感染、合并副鼻窦炎及不适当的居室清扫等。结论 特异性免疫治疗能改善哮喘患儿的PEF及Ch-CACT评分,能明显改善变应性鼻炎的临床症状及VAS评分,是一种防治变应性哮喘合并鼻炎持久有效的方法。气候因素、呼吸道感染及合并副鼻窦炎是导致特异性免疫治疗期间病情反复的主要原因。     

Spezifische Immuntherapie im Kindesalter

Background

Subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) immunotherapy are the two routes for administering allergen-specific immunotherapy for inhalative allergens.

Immunotherapy

The only route of administration for children with bee or wasp venom allergy is SCIT and it is also the primary route of administration for children with asthmatic complaints. Both SCIT and SLIT were shown to be effective in controlling symptoms and in reducing rescue medication in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis sensitized to grass pollens. There is evidence from clinical trials that SLIT with specific grass pollen allergens administered as tablets (e.g. Grazax and Oralair) or drops (Infecto-SLIT forte) is effective and safe in children. A recently published meta-analysis compared both forms of administration and showed a trend toward favoring SCIT for symptom and medication scores. Moreover, local adverse events after SLIT, such as oral pruritus, burning sensation, lip or tongue swelling and gastrointestinal symptoms are pronounced during the first months of administration, which might reduce patient compliance and adherence to specific immunotherapy. Finally, SCIT but not SLIT showed a reduced risk of developing asthma and new sensitization during treatment and 7 years after discontinuation of therapy indicating long-term preventive effects of SCIT.

Conclusions

Although there is evidence of effectiveness of both SCIT and SLIT with grass pollen extracts in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, SCIT is the primary mode of administration in children. Further research is needed to establish the clinical effectiveness of SCIT versus SLIT in a head-to-head trial in children.     

Safety and efficacy of oral fexofenadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis – a pooled analysis of three studies

Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common clinical conditions in children; however, data regarding the safety of antihistamines in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis are limiting. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fexofenadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis, data were pooled from three, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 2-week trials in children (6-11 year) with seasonal allergic rhinitis. All studies assessed fexofenadine HCl 30 mg b.i.d.; two studies included fexofenadine HCl at 15 and 60 mg b.i.d. Patients (and investigators) reported any adverse events during the trial. Physical examinations, including measurements of vital signs and laboratory tests, were performed. Efficacy assessments (total symptom score and individual symptom scores) were evaluated. Exposure to fexofenadine HCl 30 mg b.i.d. and to any fexofenadine dose exceeded 10,000 and 17,000 patient days, respectively. Incidences of adverse events, and discontinuations because of adverse events, were low and similar across treatment groups. In the placebo group, 24.4% of subjects reported adverse events compared with 24.1% for fexofenadine HCl 30 mg b.i.d., and 28.4% for all fexofenadine-treated groups. The most common adverse event overall was headache (4.3% placebo; 5.8% fexofenadine HCl 30 mg b.i.d.; and 7.2% any fexofenadine doses). Treatment-related adverse events were similar across treatment groups with no sedative effects. Fexofenadine HCl 30 mg b.i.d. was significantly superior to placebo in reducing the total symptom score and all individual seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms, including nasal congestion (p < 0.05). Fexofenadine, at doses of up to 60 mg b.i.d., is safe and non-sedating, and fexofenadine HCl 30 mg b.i.d. effectively reduces all seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in children aged 6-11 years.