Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT)

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of infliximab therapy for the articular and dermatologic manifestations of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: One hundred four patients with PsA in whom prior therapy with at least 1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) had failed were recruited into this investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. During the initial blinded portion of the study, patients received infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. After week 16, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50, while patients initially randomized to infliximab continued to receive active treatment at the same dose through week 50. The primary efficacy outcome was achievement of the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20) at week 16. Additional predefined clinical efficacy assessments included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, the ACR50 and ACR70 criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, ratings of enthesitis and dactylitis, and the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria score. RESULTS: The proportion of infliximab-treated patients who achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (65%) was significantly higher than the proportion of placebo-treated patients who achieved this response (10%). In addition, 46% of infliximab-treated patients achieved an ACR50 response, and 29% achieved an ACR70 response; no placebo-treated patient achieved these end points. Among patients who had PASI scores of >/=2.5 at baseline, 68% of infliximab-treated patients achieved improvement of >/=75% in the PASI score at week 16 compared with none of the placebo-treated patients. Continued therapy with infliximab resulted in sustained improvement in articular and dermatologic manifestations of PsA through week 50. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Therapy with infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg significantly improved the signs and symptoms of arthritis, psoriasis, dactylitis, and enthesitis in patients with active PsA that had been resistant to DMARD therapy. With continued infliximab treatment, benefits were sustained through 50 weeks. The benefit-to-risk ratio appeared favorable in this study population.     

Infliximab maintains a high degree of clinical response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through 1 year of treatment: results from the IMPACT 2 trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab through 1 year in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the IMPACT 2 trial. METHODS: In this double blind, placebo controlled, phase III study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through 1 year. Patients with persistent disease activity could enter early escape at week 16, and all remaining placebo patients crossed over to infliximab at week 24. Patients randomised to infliximab who had no response or who lost response could escalate their dose to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Clinical efficacy was assessed based on the proportion of patients achieving ACR 20 and PASI 75 responses. Major clinical response (that is, maintenance of ACR 70 response for 24 continuous weeks) was assessed for the first time in PsA. RESULTS: Through 1 year of treatment, 58.9% and 61.4% of patients in the randomised infliximab and placebo/infliximab groups, respectively, achieved ACR 20; corresponding figures for PASI 75 were 50.0% and 60.3%. At week 54, major clinical response was achieved by 12.1% of patients in the infliximab group. The safety profile of infliximab through week 54 was consistent with that seen through week 24. Two malignancies occurred: basal cell skin cancer (placebo) and stage I Hodgkin's lymphoma (infliximab). CONCLUSION: Infliximab maintains a high degree of clinical efficacy and continues to be well tolerated in patients with PsA through 1 year of treatment.     

Infliximab improves health related quality of life and physical function in patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the IMPACT 2 trial. METHODS: 200 patients with PsA unresponsive to conventional treatment were randomised to intravenous infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22; patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. HRQoL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at weeks 0, 14, and 24. Functional disability was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at every visit through week 24. Associations between changes in quality of life (SF-36) and articular (American College of Rheumatology (ACR)) and dermatological (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)) responses were examined. RESULTS: Mean percentage improvement from baseline in HAQ was 48.6% in the infliximab group compared with worsening of 18.4% in the placebo group at week 14 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 58.6% and 19.4% of infliximab and placebo treated patients, respectively, achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ (that is, > or = 0.3 unit decrease) at week 14 (p < 0.001). Increases in physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores and all eight scales of the SF-36 in the infliximab group were greater than those in the placebo group at week 14 (p < or = 0.001). These benefits were sustained through week 24. Patients achieving ACR20 and PASI75 responses had the greatest improvements in PCS and MCS scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PsA, infliximab 5 mg/kg significantly improved HRQoL and physical function compared with placebo through 24 weeks.     

Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Adalimumab, a fully human, anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for its safety and efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active PsA and a history of inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive 40 mg adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 24 weeks. Study visits were at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 12 and the change in the modified total Sharp score of structural damage at week 24. Secondary end points were measures of joint disease, disability, and quality of life in all patients, as well as the severity of skin disease in those patients with psoriasis involving at least 3% of body surface area. RESULTS: At week 12, 58% of the adalimumab-treated patients (87 of 151) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 14% of the placebo-treated patients (23 of 162) (P < 0.001). At week 24, similar ACR20 response rates were maintained and the mean change in the modified total Sharp score was -0.2 in patients receiving adalimumab and 1.0 in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Among the 69 adalimumab-treated patients evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), 59% achieved a 75% PASI improvement response at 24 weeks, compared with 1% of the 69 placebo-treated patients evaluated (P < 0.001). Disability and quality of life measures were also significantly improved with adalimumab treatment compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations, inhibited structural changes on radiographs, lessened disability due to joint damage, and improved quality of life in patients with moderately to severely active PsA.     

Sustained clinical response and high infliximab survival in psoriatic arthritis patients: a 3-year long-term study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, toxicity, and survival of infliximab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Thirty-two patients with PsA, refractory to at least 2 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, were included in this prospective, open-label, uncontrolled study. All had active disease, defined as having a tender or swollen joint count > or =6, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores > or =10, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate > or =28 mm Hg/h, or C-reactive protein > or =10 mg/L. The primary endpoints were the percentage of patients who achieved the Psoriatic Arthritis Response criteria (PsARC) and the improvement of PASI. Patients were treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter for a period of 3 years. Data concerning infliximab efficacy, tolerability, concomitant therapy, adverse events, and drug discontinuation were recorded. The clinical response according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria as well as the disease activity for 28 joint indices score (DAS-28) were also recorded. RESULTS: After the third year of treatment, PsARC was achieved by 23/32 of patients, PASI 70 by 24/32, and PASI 90 by 23/32. A significant improvement of ACR and DAS-28 was noted. Clinical improvement was associated with a reduction of acute phase reactants. Eight patients withdrew from the study primarily for acute allergic reactions. After the first year, infliximab survival was 84%, while after the second year, it was 75%, which was maintained throughout the third year of treatment. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients with PsA. The clinical response was maintained for a period of 3 years with high infliximab survival.     

Golimumab,a new human tumor necrosis factor α antibody,administered every four weeks as a subcutaneous injection in psoriatic arthritis: Twenty‐four–week efficacy and safety results of a randomized,placebo‐controlled study

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

Adult patients with PsA who had at least 3 swollen and 3 tender joints and active psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 113), golimumab 50 mg (n = 146), or golimumab 100 mg (n = 146) every 4 weeks through week 20. Efficacy assessments through week 24 included the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in patients in whom at least 3% of the body surface area was affected by psoriasis at baseline, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF‐36), the disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), the physician's global assessment of psoriatic nail disease, and enthesitis (using the PsA‐modified Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score [MASES] index).

Results

At week 14, 48% of all patients receiving golimumab, 51% of patients receiving golimumab 50 mg, and 45% of patients receiving golimumab 100 mg achieved an ACR20 response (the primary end point), compared with 9% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Among the 74% of patients in whom at least 3% of the body surface area was affected by psoriasis at baseline, 40% of those in the golimumab 50 mg group and 58% of those in the golimumab 100 mg group had at least 75% improvement in the PASI at week 14 (major secondary end point), compared with 3% of placebo‐treated patients (P < 0.001 for both doses). Significant improvement was observed for other major secondary end points (the HAQ and the SF‐36), the NAPSI, the physician's global assessment of psoriatric nail disease, and the PsA‐modified MASES index in each golimumab group compared with placebo. This efficacy was maintained through week 24. Golimumab was generally well tolerated.

Conclusion

Treatment with golimumab at doses of 50 mg and 100 mg significantly improved active PsA and associated skin and nail psoriasis through week 24.

     

The Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial (IMPACT): results of radiographic analyses after 1 year

OBJECTIVE: Infliximab is effective in improving signs and symptoms of joint/skin involvement, functional status, and quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Using IMPACT trial data, we assessed the effect of infliximab (IFX) on structural damage in PsA. METHODS: Patients with active PsA were randomly assigned to receive placebo (PBO/IFX) or infliximab 5 mg/kg (IFX/IFX) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14, with the primary endpoint at week 16. The PBO group received infliximab loading doses at weeks 16, 18, and 22. Thereafter, all patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50. Hand/feet radiographs were obtained at weeks 0 and 50. Total radiographic scores were determined using the PsA modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score. Projected annual rate of progression was calculated by dividing x ray score by disease duration (years). RESULTS: As reported previously, 65% of infliximab treated patients versus 10% of PBO treated patients achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (p<0.001). At week 50, 69% of patients achieved an ACR20 response. Radiographs (baseline and week 50) were available for 72/104 patients. At baseline, estimated mean annual rate of progression was 5.8 modified vdH-S points/year. Mean (median) changes from baseline to week 50 in the total modified vdH-S score were -1.95 (-0.50) for PBO/IFX and -1.52 (-0.50) for IFX/IFX patients (p = NS). At week 50, 85% and 84% of patients in the PBO/IFX and IFX/IFX groups had no worsening in the total modified vdH-S score. CONCLUSION: Infliximab inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA through week 50.     

英夫利西单抗联合改变病情抗风湿药治疗难治性银屑病关节炎的临床疗效及随访观察

目的 探讨英夫利西单抗联合2种以上改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗难治性银屑病关节炎( PsA)的临床疗效与安全性.方法 本研究为开放性临床研究.选择2种及2种以上DMARDs治疗3个月以上无效的PsA患者,分别于0、2、6、14周(之后每间隔8周使用1次)静脉滴注英夫利西单抗(3 mg/kg),联合DMARDs治疗.以PsA疗效标准(PsARC)为主要疗效指标,修改的美国风湿病学会疗效标准提高20％(ACR20)为次要疗效指标,对关节病变进行评估,以银屑病皮损面积和严重性指数(PASI)提高50％、75％ (PASI 50、PASI 75)为银屑病皮损疗效指标,对皮肤病变进行评估;并分析具体评价指标[包括压痛关节数、肿胀关节数、疼痛视觉模拟评分、患者总体评价(PGA)、医生总体评价、皮肤病生命质量指数( DLQI)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)]的变化.记录在整个观察过程中发生的所有不良反应.统计学方法采用x2检验和重复测量数据的方差分析检验.结果 共21例患者纳入研究,21例患者全部完成14周的临床疗效评估,其中5例完成26～104周临床观察,2例进行了长达104周的临床观察.治疗14周时21例患者达到PsARC的比例分别为84％,达到ACR20的比例分别为77％,达到PASI 50改善的比例为76％,达到PASI 75改善的比例为68％.14周时患者压痛关节数、肿胀关节数、疼痛视觉模拟评分、PGA、医生总体评价、DLQI、HAQ均显著低于基线水平(P＜0.05),且与治疗前相比差异具有统计学意义.5例患者进行了26～104周随访观察,其中2例进行了长达104周的临床观察,4例患者病情平稳,1例患者于104周时皮疹与关节症状反复.最常见的不良反应为上呼吸道感染和皮肤及其附属器官的损害,其次是肝功能异常.结论英夫利西单抗联合DMARDs治疗PsA有效、安全、可行.     

Continued inhibition of radiographic progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis following 2 years of treatment with etanercept

OBJECTIVE: Clinical and radiographic responses were evaluated in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated for up to 2 years with etanercept. METHODS: Patients were previously randomized to receive placebo or etanercept in a double-blind study and chose to participate in the current open-label extension phase. All patients received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly. Radiographic progression was determined at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years using the Sharp method modified to include joints frequently affected in PsA. Arthritis and psoriasis responses were determined using American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) improvement criteria, PsA response criteria (PsARC), and the psoriasis area severity index (PASI). RESULTS: Of 205 patients randomized, 169 entered open-label, and 141 [71 randomized to receive placebo (placebo/etanercept) and 70 randomized to receive etanercept (etanercept/etanercept)] had radiographic data available for analysis at 2 years. ACR20 criteria, PsARC, and PASI 50 criteria were met by 64%, 84%, and 62%, respectively, of etanercept/etanercept patients at the end of the 48-week open-label period. Placebo/etanercept patients achieved comparable results within 12 weeks that were sustained at 48 weeks (63%, 80%, and 73%). Radiographic progression was inhibited in the etanercept/ etanercept patients (mean adjusted change in total Sharp score of -0.38 from baseline to 2 yrs). In placebo/etanercept patients, disease progression was inhibited once patients began receiving etanercept (mean adjusted change of -0.22 from 1 year to 2 years). Adverse event rates were similar to those observed during randomized phase, with only one serious adverse event deemed possibly related to etanercept. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate a sustained benefit of etanercept treatment, including inhibition of radiographic progression, in patients with PsA.     

Infliximab inhibits progression of radiographic damage in patients with active psoriatic arthritis through one year of treatment: Results from the induction and maintenance psoriatic arthritis clinical trial 2

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on progression of structural damage over 1 year in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the Induction and Maintenance Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Trial 2. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 200 patients with active PsA were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 54. At week 24, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab (5 mg/kg). Based on predefined criteria, patients randomized to receive placebo could enter early escape by receiving infliximab (5 mg/kg) starting at week 16, and patients randomized to receive infliximab could have the dose increased to 10 mg/kg starting at week 38. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were randomized to receive. Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline and at weeks 24 and 54. Two readers blinded to treatment assignment and radiograph sequence independently evaluated erosions and joint space narrowing using the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method modified for PsA. RESULTS: At week 24, patients randomized to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg had significantly less radiographic progression compared with patients randomized to receive placebo, with mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score of -0.70 +/- 2.53 and 0.82 +/- 2.62, respectively (P < 0.001). At week 54, mean +/- SD changes from baseline in the total Sharp/van der Heijde score were -0.94 +/- 3.40 in patients randomized to receive infliximab and 0.53 +/- 2.60 in those receiving placebo/infliximab (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Infliximab significantly inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA as early as 6 months after starting treatment, and the beneficial effect continues through 1 year of infliximab therapy.     

Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: Results of a double‐blind,randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

Objective

Adalimumab, a fully human, anti–tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for its safety and efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

Patients with moderately to severely active PsA and a history of inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive 40 mg adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 24 weeks. Study visits were at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 12 and the change in the modified total Sharp score of structural damage at week 24. Secondary end points were measures of joint disease, disability, and quality of life in all patients, as well as the severity of skin disease in those patients with psoriasis involving at least 3% of body surface area.

Results

At week 12, 58% of the adalimumab‐treated patients (87 of 151) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 14% of the placebo‐treated patients (23 of 162) (P < 0.001). At week 24, similar ACR20 response rates were maintained and the mean change in the modified total Sharp score was −0.2 in patients receiving adalimumab and 1.0 in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Among the 69 adalimumab‐treated patients evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), 59% achieved a 75% PASI improvement response at 24 weeks, compared with 1% of the 69 placebo‐treated patients evaluated (P < 0.001). Disability and quality of life measures were also significantly improved with adalimumab treatment compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally safe and well‐tolerated.

Conclusion

Adalimumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations, inhibited structural changes on radiographs, lessened disability due to joint damage, and improved quality of life in patients with moderately to severely active PsA.

     

Efficacy of infliximab on MRI-determined bone oedema in psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is commonly associated with bone pathology, including entheseal new bone formation and osteolysis. On MRI, areas of active clinical involvement are represented by bone oedema and synovitis. Aim: To assess the impact of infliximab on bone oedema in PsA as shown by MRI. METHODS: 18 patients with joint swelling, psoriasis and seronegativity for rheumatoid factor received four infusions of infliximab, 3 mg/kg, in combination with methotrexate. MRI of the affected hand (12 patients) or knee joints (6 patients) was performed before and after treatment. The primary outcome was the assessment of bone oedema and synovitis at 20 weeks as shown by MRI. Secondary outcomes included the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, psoriasis skin scores (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)) and a quality of life measure (Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life (PsAQoL)). RESULTS: At baseline, bone oedema was seen in 50% of patients (seven hands and two knees) in 30% of scanned joints, and this improved or resolved in all cases in the hand joints (p = 0.018) and in one knee joint at 20 weeks. Synovitis was found to be reduced in 90% of cases on MRI. Likewise, a significant improvement in all clinical outcomes, including PASI (p = 0.003) and PsAQoL (p = 0.006) was seen at week 20. 65% (n = 11) of the patients achieved an ACR response, of whom 45% had ACR70 or above and 54% had ACR20 or ACR50. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab treatment is associated with dramatic improvements in MRI-determined bone oedema in PsA in the short term. It remains to be determined whether infliiximib treatment is the cause for prevention of new bone formation, bone fusion or osteolysis in PsA as shown by radiography.     

Open-label study of infliximab treatment for psoriatic arthritis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of reduction of inflammation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate infliximab efficacy and safety in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-unresponsive psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: In a 54-week, open-label, compassionate-use study, 10 patients received intravenous infliximab (5 mg/kg; weeks 0, 2, 6; individualized dosing after week 10). Patients continued their current therapy (stable dose) until week 10. Assessments were performed at weeks 2, 6, 10, and 54. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) objectively measured joint inflammation at weeks 0 and 10. RESULTS: Patients achieved a 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (ACR20) in all patients by week 2; 8 patients improved 70% (ACR70) at week 10; 6 patients maintained ACR70 after week 54. Week 10 MRI revealed an 82.5% mean reduction in inflammation from baseline, and psoriasis area and severity index scores were reduced by 71.3% +/- 16.7%. There were no significant adverse events, severe infections, or infusion reactions. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was effective, safe, and well tolerated in PsA. Arthritis and psoriasis improved in all patients during the 54-week evaluation. Further investigation of the use of infliximab for PsA and psoriasis is warranted.     

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis vulgaris with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor infliximab

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple infusions with achimeric, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis vulgaris. METHODS: Over 22 weeks, nine patients with both active psoriasis and PsA received five infusions of 3 mg/kg infliximab. The endpoints included changes in the swollen and tender joints counts, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for improvement response rates 20, 50, and 70, and improvement in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). RESULTS: The swollen count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) fell from means of 5.33+/-2.22 and 17.80+/-4.21 to 1.44+/-1.09 and 9.77+/-0.92, respectively, by week 2 ( P=0.02, P=0.02). This benefit was sustained through week 22 (2.00+/-1.12/7.77+/-3.68, P=0.05/ P=0.002). The ACR 20/50/70 response was achieved in 89%/56%/22% of cases. The mean PASI score improved from 19.04+/-5.41 to 4.91+/-2.51 ( P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Multiple infusions of infliximab were effective and well tolerated in patients with active psoriasis and PsA.     

Lymphocyte depletion with fludarabine in patients with psoriatic arthritis: clinical and immunological effects

OBJECTIVE: To obtain preliminary information on the safety and efficacy of fludarabine in PsA and analyse its immunomodulatory effects in peripheral blood and synovial tissue. METHODS: 15 patients with active PsA who did not respond to DMARDs were randomly allocated to receive fludarabine every four weeks or placebo. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who met the ACR20 and the psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC) at 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were changes in tender or swollen joint counts and scores of the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). Phenotypic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), synovial immunohistochemistry, and functional analysis of PBMC were used to determine the immunomodulatory effects of fludarabine. RESULTS: At 16 weeks the ACR20 criteria were met by 3/7 (43%) fludarabine treated v 0/8 placebo treated patients (p=0.08); the PsARC was achieved by 4/7 (57%) fludarabine treated v 2/8 (25%) placebo treated patients; and 3/7 (43%) fludarabine treated v 0/7 placebo treated patients had > or =20% improvement in the PASI. Marked peripheral lymphopenia involving naive (CD4(+) CD45RA(+)) and memory (CD4(+) CD45RO(+)) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, and B cells was seen in fludarabine treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In PsA fludarabine induces significant peripheral, but modest, synovial lymphopenia, and a trend towards improved clinical response.     

Treatment of refractory psoriatic arthritis with infliximab: a 12 month observational study of 16 patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of infliximab in patients with recalcitrant psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with treatment resistant PsA and at least six actively inflamed joints, who had failed to respond to at least two disease modifying agents, were included. Infliximab (5 mg/kg) was given at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 6-8 weeks pending response. Clinical and laboratory measures included actively inflamed joint count (AJC), swollen joint count (SJC), psoriasis severity (PASI), HAQ, and SF-36. Response was defined as at least a 30% reduction in AJC and PASI. Differences from baseline were analysed using the signed rank test. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (12 male, 4 female), mean age 48 and disease duration 14 years, were included. At baseline the mean AJC was 22.5 and mean PASI 4.5. Eleven patients continued receiving methotrexate. The AJC did not show a statistically significant response. SJC improved significantly at week 54 (p = 0.01). The PASI improved significantly at weeks 14 (p = 0.001) and 30 (p = 0.002) and CRP was reduced significantly at week 30 (p = 0.02). The HAQ score improved at week 30 (p = 0.02). Six patients became positive for dsDNA without clinical features of a connective tissue disease. Six patients discontinued treatment owing to lack of efficacy (1) and toxicity (5). Other serious adverse events included: urticaria (3); thrombocytopenia (1); lower gastrointestinal bleeding (2); severe diarrhoea (2); serious infections (6). Raised transaminases, at least 1.5x normal, occurred in four patients. CONCLUSION: In refractory PsA, infliximab led to a marked improvement in psoriasis but modest response in joint disease. Toxicity and rate of treatment termination was high.     

Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence on the clinical effectiveness of etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of active and progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with an inadequate response to standard treatment (including DMARD therapy). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. The literature search covered a range of 13 medical databases and submissions were provided by the manufacturers of etanercept and infliximab. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of etanercept or infliximab that reported outcomes of disease activity in PsA were reviewed. RESULTS: There were two good quality double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs each for etanercept and infliximab. The results demonstrated that after initial treatment (12 weeks for etanercept and 14 or 16 weeks for infliximab) both drugs had statistically significant beneficial effects compared with placebo on ACR 20, 50 and 70, PsARC and HAQ scores. Efficacy was not dependent upon concomitant methotrexate. Results at 24 weeks indicated that the response to treatment is maintained. Effects on psoriasis were beneficial, particularly with infliximab. Uncontrolled radiographic assessment data at one year indicated a beneficial effect of both etanercept and infliximab on the progression of joint disease. CONCLUSION: Our review indicates that both etanercept and infliximab are efficacious in the treatment of PsA with beneficial effects on both joint and psoriasis symptoms and on functional status. There are limited data indicating that etanercept and infliximab can delay joint disease progression. Further long-term data are required to confirm and consolidate the evidence base for both drugs.     

Performance of response criteria for assessing peripheral arthritis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: analysis of data from randomised controlled trials of two tumour necrosis factor inhibitors

BACKGROUND: In recent clinical trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the response criteria and disease activity measures that have been used were those developed for rheumatoid arthritis. However, these have not yet been validated in PsA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness and discriminative capacity of the psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria and the Disease Activity Score (DAS) and core-set measures in patients with PsA and peripheral arthritis, using the data from two randomised placebo-controlled trials of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. METHODS: In an infliximab trial, 104 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive placebo or infliximab for 16 weeks. In an etanercept trial, 60 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive placebo or etanercept for 12 weeks. Data from baseline and the end of the intervention phase were used from each study. Responsiveness was assessed using the standardised response mean and effect size. Capacity to discriminate between the active drug and placebo was assessed using t values or a chi2 test. Measures were ranked in order of their t value or chi2 value. RESULTS: The EULAR criteria performed better in discriminating the active drug from placebo than the ACR20 improvement criteria, which in turn performed better than the PsARC. It was also found that the pooled indices (DAS and DAS28) were generally more responsive, and performed better in discriminating active drug from placebo, than the single core-set measures. CONCLUSION: Response criteria and pooled indices developed for rheumatoid arthritis are useful for the assessment of arthritis in PsA clinical trials.     

Safety and efficacy of adalimumab in treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis who had failed disease modifying antirheumatic drug therapy

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with an inadequate response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). METHODS: In a placebo controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, patients were treated for 12 weeks with subcutaneous injections of adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) or placebo, followed by a period of open-label treatment with adalimumab 40 mg eow. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) core criteria at Week 12. Secondary efficacy measures included the modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) and assessments of disability, psoriatic lesions, and quality of life. For missing data, nonresponder imputation was used for ACR and PsARC scores and last observation carried forward for other measures. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients received study drug (51 adalimumab, 49 placebo). At Week 12, an ACR20 response was achieved by 39% of adalimumab patients versus 16% of placebo patients (p = 0.012), and a PsARC response was achieved by 51% with adalimumab versus 24% with placebo (p = 0.007). At Week 12, measures of skin lesions and disability were statistically significantly improved with adalimumab. After Week 12, open-label adalimumab provided continued improvement for adalimumab patients and initiated rapid improvement for placebo patients, with ACR20 response rates of 65% and 57%, respectively, observed at Week 24. Serious adverse events had similar frequencies during therapy with placebo (4.1%), blinded adalimumab (2.0%), and open-label adalimumab (3.1%). No serious infections occurred during adalimumab therapy. CONCLUSION: In this study of patients who had active PsA and a previous, inadequate response to DMARD therapy, adalimumab was well tolerated and significantly reduced the signs, symptoms, and disability of PsA during 12 weeks of blinded and 12 weeks of open-label therapy. Adalimumab also improved psoriasis in these patients.     

Infliximab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a preliminary study from China

Aim: To report the efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Chinese patients. Methods: This is a multicentre double‐blind placebo controlled study. Patients with active RA despite being on a stable dose of methotrexate were randomly assigned to receive either infliximab 3 mg/kg body weight or placebo infusion at weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14. All patients continued their stable dose of methotrexate throughout the study. Patients were assessed at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 18 for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50% and 70% response (ACR20, 50 and 70, respectively). Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), c‐reactive protein (CRP), duration of morning stiffness and adverse effects were monitored. Results: Infliximab was effective in improving the disease activity of RA with significant ACR20 response observed at week 2 (infliximab vs. placebo 52.87%vs. 13.95%, P < 0.05). Significant differences in the ACR20 and ACR50 response rates between the two treatment groups were also observed at week 18 (75.86% and 43.68% of patients receiving infliximab vs. 48.84% and 25.58% and 13.95% of patients on placebo, P = 0.0003 and P = 0.011, respectively). Infliximab was generally well tolerated. The rate of adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events were similar between the two groups. Most adverse reactions were transient. One patient in the infliximab group developed tuberculosis during the study. One patient in the placebo group developed antinuclear antibodies without obvious signs of systemic lupus erythematosus. Conclusion: In this preliminary study, infliximab infusions, at a dose of 3 mg/kg body weight given at various intervals over 14 weeks, were effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of active RA in Chinese. Infliximab also appeared to be well tolerated. Further studies involving a larger number of patients over a more prolonged period will further evaluate the long‐term efficacy and safety of infliximab in this group of patients.