Oral misoprostol in the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous ergometrine, intramuscular oxytocin, and oral misoprostol in the control of postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: Mean blood loss, rates of blood loss between 500 and 1000 ml, hematocrit fall greater than 10%, and need for additional oxytocic agents and nature and rates of adverse effects were assessed in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. RESULTS: All outcomes were similar in the 3 groups. The main adverse effects in the misoprostol group were temperatures higher than 99 degrees F, which normalized within 2 h and shivering, which was mild and self-limiting. CONCLUSIONS: Oral misoprostol is as effective as conventional oxytocic agents in preventing postpartum hemorrhage and can be recommended for use in low-resource settings.     

Rectal versus oral misoprostol for active management of third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial

Aim of the study  

To test that rectal misoprostol is effective for active management of third stage of labor, and probably with less side effects than oral misoprostol.     

Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and side effects of low-dose oral misoprostol with vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: Women with Bishop score 6 or less admitted for labor induction at term were eligible for this randomized controlled trial. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancy, breech, fetal distress, or previous uterine scar. The allocation to the oral misoprostol group (20 microg given every 2 hours increased to 40 microg depending on uterine contractions) or to the vaginal dinoprostone group (2 mg twice, 6 hours apart) was contained in a sealed, opaque, and consecutively numbered envelope. RESULTS: Two hundred women (100 in each group) were included. The proportion of vaginal delivery within 24 hours was 56% in the misoprostol group and 62% in the dinoprostone group (relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.72-1.14). The risk of cesarean section was 18% and 19%, respectively. The median interval to delivery, calculated from survival analysis, was longer in the misoprostol group (1305 minutes) compared with the dinoprostone group (1080 minutes). The log-rank test was not significant (P =.35). Uterine hyperstimulation occurred in 9% of women in the misoprostol group compared with 14% in the dinoprostone group (P =.27). The only significant difference in neonatal outcomes was a more frequent presence of thick meconium in the misoprostol group (P =.03). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in terms of effectiveness and safety between low-dose oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone used for induction of labor. This regimen avoids the excessive uterine contractility noted in previous studies, where higher doses of misoprostol were administered at longer intervals.     

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral misoprostol (50 microg) administered every 3 hours compared to vaginal misoprostol (50 microg) administered every 6 hours for induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blind randomized trial, 126 women received misoprostol (50 microg) either orally every 3 hours or vaginally every 6 hours for induction of labor. Outcomes included time from induction to delivery, oxytocin augmentation, incidence of hyperstimulation and tachysystole, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Median time to delivery was shorter in those women who were receiving vaginal misoprostol (vaginal 14.3 hours vs oral 23.1 hours; P =.0004) and more women in the oral group required oxytocin augmentation of labor (73% vs 42%) (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.06). The incidence of hyperstimulation was similar between the groups, but there was an increased incidence of tachysystole in the vaginal group (26.5% vs 9.7%)(RR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.16 to 6.51). There was no difference between the groups with respect to mode of delivery or neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Vaginal misoprostol administered every 6 hours is more effective for induction of labor than oral misoprostol administered every 3 hours. The higher rates of tachysystole with use of vaginal misoprostol in the current study warrant further investigation.     

Sublingual misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 50 microg compared with 100 microg of repetitive misoprostol dosages administered sublingually for labor induction. METHODS: Two hundred twelve women who presented with an indication for cervical ripening and labor induction were randomly assigned to 50 microg or 100 microg of misoprostol tablets administered sublingually with double masking of treatment group dose allocation. The primary outcome was the interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Among the 203 evaluable participants, 102 were randomly assigned to the 50-microg group and 101 to the 100-microg group. The proportion of patients who delivered vaginally in less than 12 hours and less than 24 hours was significantly higher in the 100-microg group: 28% and 63% in the 100-microg group compared with 15% and 36% in the 50-microg group, respectively (P = .01 and P = .001). The incidence of tachysystole was significantly higher in the 100-microg group (P = .02). The incidence of hyperstimulation syndrome was higher in the 100-microg group, but not statistically significant (P = .46). With respect to the proportion of patients delivered after a single dose, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcome, no significant differences between treatment groups were observed. Regarding the need for oxytocin augmentation, 61% required augmentation in the 100-microg group compared with 81% in the 50-microg group (P = .002). CONCLUSION: One hundred micrograms of sublingual misoprostol is more effective than 50 microg of sublingual misoprostol, but is associated with a higher incidence of tachysystole and uterine hyperstimulation syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

Oral misoprostol for the prevention of primary post-partum hemorrhage during third stage of labor

AIM: To assess the effectiveness of oral misoprostol compared with methylergometrine in the prevention of primary post-partum hemorrhage during the third stage of labor. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial of 864 singleton low-risk pregnant women. The outcomes were total blood loss, duration of the third stage of labor and peripartal change in hematocrit. Comparisons were by the chi2-test and Student t-test. Relative risks were calculated for side-effects profile. A P-value of less than 0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: The biodata of all the participants were similar. The mean blood loss for the misoprostol and methylergometrine groups was 191.6 +/- 134.5 mL and 246.0 +/- 175.5 mL, respectively (95% CI: -79.3 to -39.5 mL). The mean duration of the third stage of labor was 19.6 +/- 2.4 min and 9.4 +/- 3.3 min in the misoprostol and methylergometrine groups, respectively (95% CI: 9.82-10.58 min). More subjects had blood loss >500 mL, 42 (9.7%) versus 6 (1.4%), and peripartal hematocrit change greater than 10%, 38 (8.8%) versus 5 (1.2%), in the methylergometrine group than in the misoprostol group, respectively. Also, more subjects received additional oxytocic in the methylergometrine group, compared to the misoprostol group (80 [18.5%] versus 33 [7.6%] patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered misoprostol was more effective in reducing blood loss during the third stage of labor than intramuscular methylergometrine. However, there were more subjects in the misoprostol group in whom duration of the third stage of labor was greater than 15 min and who also had manual placental removal than in the methylergometrine group.     

Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with the standard regimen using dinoprostone for induction of labor. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial in Cape Town, South Africa. A total of 573 women admitted for induction of labor were randomized to receive oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol, or the control, dinoprostone. Misoprostol was given orally or vaginally as a 50-microg dose at 6-hour intervals to a maximum of four doses. The dinoprostone gel was given as a 1-mg dose in the posterior fornix every 6 hours (maximum two doses). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in vaginal delivery rate in 24 hours between the vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone groups. However, significantly fewer women delivered vaginally in the oral misoprostol group compared with those in the dinoprostone group (relative risk 0.71, 99% confidence interval 0.51, 0.99). The median induction to vaginal delivery time in the vaginal misoprostol, oral misoprostol, and dinoprostone groups was 12 hours, 23 hours, and 14 hours, respectively. The cesarean rate was approximately 33% in all the groups. There were more cesareans performed for fetal distress in the vaginal misoprostol group compared with the dinoprostone group (relative risk 2.86, 99% confidence interval 1.49, 5.46). There was a higher incidence of tachysystole in the vaginal misoprostol group (5.8%) compared with the other two groups: oral misoprostol (0.8%) and dinoprostone (0.8%), but this difference was not statistically significant. There were no differences in maternal or fetal complications. CONCLUSION: Vaginal misoprostol is as effective as dinoprostone in induction of labor, but it is associated with more tachysystole and cesarean sections for fetal distress compared with dinoprostone. Oral misoprostol results in fewer vaginal deliveries in 24 hours, but it is not associated with increased tachysystole or fetal distress.     

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 400 mug with intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Three hundred and fifty-five women randomized to receive either oral misoprostol 400 mug or intramuscular syntometrine in the third stage of labor were studied. The change in hemoglobin level from before to 48 h after delivery, use of additional oxytocics and treatment related side effects were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the change in hemoglobin level and mean blood loss. The incidence of shivering was significantly higher in the misoprostol group whilst that of vomiting was significantly higher in the syntometrine group. There were no differences in the incidence of nausea, headache, diarrhea and pyrexia between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Orally administered misoprostol at a dose of 400 mug is an acceptable alternative in preventing post-partum blood loss, as measured by the peri-partum change in hemoglobin level and was not associated with an increased incidence of side effects.     

Early amniotomy after vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial

Purpose

To review all cases of genitourinary fistula, their causes, management and outcome.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review of all fistula cases referred to the Urogynecology Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2005 to December 2011.

Results

Sixteen genitourinary fistula cases were identified; nine (56 %) cases of vesicovaginal fistula, four (25 %) cases of vesicouterine fistula, and three (19 %) cases of vesicocervical fistula. Mean age was 41 (29–61) and mean parity was 7.4 (2–15). Out of the 16 cases, 12 (75 %) had obstetrical surgical complications, of which 8 (50 %) had complications of cesarean sections. Twelve of 15 cases (80 %) were cured after primary surgical repair, 2 (13 %) after secondary repair and 1 after tertiary repair. One case was cured after conservative management.

Conclusion

Most of the genitourinary fistulae were of iatrogenic obstetric causes, mainly cesarean section with none of the cases due to obstructed labor unlike fistulae in developing countries or developed countries fistulae (iatrogenic gynecologic origin).     

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming in first-trimester abortion: a randomized trial.

The objective of this study was to compare the oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before surgical abortion up to 63 days' gestation. A total of 900 pregnant women, with ages ranging from 18 to 42 years, who asked for pregnancy termination, were included in this study. Women were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: oral administration of 400 microg misoprostol, 8 h before aspiration; and vaginal self-administration of 400 microg misoprostol, 4 h before aspiration. During admission, all subjects were checked on a 15-min basis. The preoperative cervical dilatation achieved was the main outcome assessed. The cervix was dilated (Hegar > or = 8) in 348 (78%) subjects from the oral treatment group and in 391 (87%) women from the vaginal treatment group; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0004). The mean dilatation achieved in the oral treatment group was 8.1 mm (SD 1.6 mm) and it was 8.5 mm (SD 1.5 mm) in the vaginal treatment group; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). The frequencies of side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and chills reported by women from the vaginal misoprostol group were 10, 8, 18 and 4 times lower, respectively, than those reported by subjects from the oral misoprostol group. In conclusion, vaginal self-administration of misoprostol was the best administration route, as it obtained the same or greater priming effectiveness of the cervix in half the time with a much lower frequency of side-effects.     

Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. METHODS: Women between 34 and 42 weeks of gestation with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score less than or equal to 6) and an indication for labor induction were randomLy assigned to receive titrated oral or vaginal misoprostol. The titrated oral misoprostol group received a basal unit of 20 mL misoprostol solution (1 mcg/mL) every 1 hour for four doses and then were titrated against individual uterine response. The vaginal group received 25 mcg every 4 hours until attaining a more favorable cervix. Vaginal delivery within 12 hours was the primary outcome. The data were analyzed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Titrated oral misoprostol was given to 101 (48.8%) women and vaginal misoprostol to 106 (51.2%) women. Completed vaginal delivery occurred within 12 hours in 75 (74.3%) women in the titrated oral group and 27 (25.5%) women in the vaginal group (relative risk [RR] 8.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.52-15.76). The incidence of hyperstimulation was 0.0% in the titrated oral group compared with 11.3% in the vaginal group (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.61). Although more women experienced nausea (10.9%) in the titrated oral group (RR 27.07, 95% CI 1.57-465.70), fewer infants had Apgar scores of less than 7 at 1 minute in the titrated oral group than in the vaginal group (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.76). CONCLUSION: Titrated oral misoprostol is associated with a lower incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and a lower cesarean delivery rate than vaginal misoprostol for labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervix. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00529295 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

Prospective randomized trial of oxytocin administration for active management of the third stage of labor

Objective

To determine the most efficient route and timing of oxytocin administration for active management of the third stage of labor.

Methods

A prospective randomized study was done at one center in Ankara, Turkey, between January and October 2010. Women with a singleton pregnancy (> 37 weeks) who had a live vaginal birth were randomly allocated to four groups: iv-A (intravenous oxytocin after delivery of the fetus), iv-B (when anterior shoulder seen), im-A (intramuscular oxytocin after delivery), and im-B (when anterior shoulder seen). Postpartum blood loss within the first hour, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and duration of the third stage were compared.

Results

A total of 600 eligible women were recruited; 150 were assigned to each group. Postpartum blood loss, prepartum and postpartum hemoglobin and hematocrit, and need for additional uterotonics were similar among groups (P > 0.05). The duration of the third stage of labor and changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly reduced in group iv-B (P < 0.05). Among women not exposed to oxytocin before delivery, postpartum blood loss was significantly lower in group iv-B (P = 0.019). Labor augmentation was related to significantly increased postpartum blood loss in all groups except iv-A.

Conclusion

Although postpartum blood loss was similar in all groups, early intravenous administration seemed to have beneficial effects.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01954186.