Attitudes, beliefs, and referral patterns of PCPs to bariatric surgeons

BACKGROUND: As severe obesity (BMI >40kg/m(2)) and its surgical treatment rise, primary care physicians (PCPs) will more frequently evaluate, refer, and oversee the long-term medical management of bariatric patients. A cross-sectional mail survey was conducted to assess the attitudes, knowledge, and bariatric referral practices among family and internal medicine physicians in North Carolina. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven percent of 611 randomly chosen PCPs returned a self-completed questionnaire. The effect of demographics, PCP attitudes, and PCP knowledge on referral practices was evaluated. RESULTS: Over 85% (221) of PCPs have treated operated bariatric patients within the last year and 76% (203) have referred patients for surgical evaluation. Thirty-five percent of practitioners felt unprepared to provide good quality long-term medical care to operated patients, and just 45% felt competent to address medical complications of bariatric surgery. Compared with nonreferring PCPs, referring physicians provided medical care to a greater number of severely obese (mean 9.9 versus 7.5, P < 0.001) and postoperative (mean 4.6 and 2.3, P < 0.001) bariatric patients. Referring providers were younger (46 versus 49, P = 0.02), had higher BMI (25.3 versus 23.5, P = 0.001), were more familiar with NIH guidelines (14.7% versus 3.0%, P = 0.02), and had completed more bariatric continuing medical education (49.8% versus 34.9%, P = 0.03). Also, they reported better resources (71.4% versus 35.4%, P < 0.001) and competency to provide good quality long-term care to postoperative bariatric patients (54.2% versus 15.4%, P < 0.001) than nonreferring peers. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgeons will optimize referrals and postoperative care for patients by working cooperatively with PCPs and by providing educational resources.     

One-stop diagnosis for symptomatic breast disease.

A consultant-led one-stop diagnostic service has been available at a busy symptomatic breast clinic each week at St Bartholomew's Hospital for 18 months. Women can be investigated appropriately using mammography, ultrasonography and cytology with immediate reporting. The aim is to achieve a diagnosis and management plan for each patient at the initial outpatient visit. A prospective audit of four consecutive clinics was undertaken to assess the impact of this service on clinical practice. Fifty patients out of 134 new and 386 follow-up clinic attenders had one-stop investigations. As a result of immediate reporting, 48 (96%) patients had a management decision made at the first outpatient visit, 9 (18%) were offered surgery, and 18 (36%) were discharged with a benign diagnosis and no dominant mass. Four symptomatic cancers were detected and evaluated on a one-stop basis, constituting 8% of the workload of this clinic. The mean wait from designated appointment until surgical consultation was 37.7 min (range -68-171 min) and that for investigation until subsequent clinical review was 56.9 min (range -4-191 min). Thirty-six (72%) one-stop patients had a total wait of less than 2 h and 95% were seen in under 3 h. It is felt that the one-stop clinic allows optimum patient management, minimises anxiety associated with symptomatic breast disease, and maximises utilisation of hospital outpatient resources.     

The use of a computer-based decision support system facilitates primary care physicians' management of chronic pain

We tested whether computer-based decision support (CBDS) could enhance the ability of primary care physicians (PCPs) to manage chronic pain. Structured summaries were generated for 50 chronic pain patients referred by PCPs to a pain clinic. A pain specialist used a decision support system to determine appropriate pain therapy and sent letters to the referring physicians outlining these recommendations. Separately, five board-certified PCPs used a CBDS system to "treat" the 50 cases. A successful outcome was defined as one in which new or adjusted therapies recommended by the software were acceptable to the PCPs (i.e., they would have prescribed it to the patient in actual practice). Two pain specialists reviewed the PCPs' outcomes and assigned medical appropriateness scores (0 = totally inappropriate to 10 = totally appropriate). One year later, the hospital database provided information on how the actual patients' pain was managed and the number of patients re-referred by their PCP to the pain clinic. On the basis of CBDS recommendations, the PCP subjects "prescribed" additional pain therapy in 213 of 250 evaluations (85%), with a medical appropriateness score of 5.5 +/- 0.1. Only 25% of these chronic pain patients were subsequently re-referred to the pain clinic within 1 yr. The use of a CBDS system may improve the ability of PCPs to manage chronic pain and may also facilitate screening of consults to optimize specialist utilization.     

Reducing surgical outpatient waiting is not the solution to meeting the 2005 colorectal cancer target

OBJECTIVES: The majority of colorectal cancers (CRC) are not diagnosed through the Rapid access route (RAR) and follow-ups (FU) may prolong outpatient-waiting time for new referrals. The aim of this study was to assess the relative contributions of an efficient colorectal clinic and a stringent colonoscopy booking system on the total journey time for CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reduced the number of follow-up appointments with the introduction of 'Paper clinics'. The composition of the new clinic was determined by the known cancer yield through RAR and non-RAR route. A prospective analysis of clinics and CRC journey times was undertaken from November 2003 for 13 months, with the new outpatient clinic template introduced in December 2003. This coincided with a stringent policy on referral pattern for colonoscopy. RESULTS: In our hospital, only 4% of RAR yield CRC. Seventy-five percent of our CRC are referred through the non-RAR route. Eighty-one percent of follow-ups in a 'paper clinic' were discharged. A flexible template for the outpatient clinics, introduced a corresponding reduction in follow-up and increased urgent and routine slots. There was a progressive drop in the follow-up to new ratio and the waiting times for routine and urgent category decreased from a median of 15.9 and 3.4 weeks to 6.7 and 0.7 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001). Average waiting times for all categories fell from 13.35 weeks in November 2003 to 3.5 weeks in December 2004, while the number of patients waiting less than 4 weeks rose from 46% to 71%. This was associated with reduction in total journey times from 93 days to 62 days (P < 0.05). DNA rates remained unaffected. CONCLUSION: Modifying outpatient clinic composition with 'paper clinics' reduces the waiting time for all referrals to a surgical clinic with a modest effect on CRC clinic waiting time. Reduction in the total waiting time to first treatment (for CRC) is due to reducing the demand on colonoscopy in favour of barium enema. Redirecting the flow of patients towards barium enema is perhaps one way of improving the existing CRC journey time to first treatment, within existing resources. Achieving the 62 day target for cancer journey time will be difficult unless traditional surgical clinic habits are challenged.     

Do patients require outpatient follow‐up after rapid referral double contrast barium enema?

Introduction  In our hospital, patients above the age of 40 years referred with a change in bowel habit without rectal bleeding undergo a double contrast barium enema (DCBE) ideally within 2 weeks. Results of benign studies are sent to a consultant colorectal surgeon and a routine clinic visit arranged. The aim of this study was to identify whether, following DCBE, patients (i) presented at a later date with colorectal cancer and (ii) needed assessment in clinic.
Method  This is a review looking at all patients who underwent DCBE prior to routine clinic visit between January 2004 and December 2005. Hospital databases were cross-referenced to identify any patients presenting with a new diagnosis of colorectal malignancy between DCBE and April 2007. Clinic letters were reviewed to identify the number of outpatient visits prior to discharge and reasons for continued follow-up.
Results  During the study period, 521 patients (age range 31–93 years, 316 female) had DCBE prior to assessment in clinic. Diagnoses: cancer 48 (9.2%), polyps 13 (2.5%), colitis 3 (0.6%), no significant pathology 457 (87.7%). Of this latter cohort, 387 (84.7%) were discharged after one clinic visit; 54 (11.9%) attended twice and 11 (2.4%) were seen more than twice. Reasons for multiple attendances were management of haemorrhoids/anal fissure or investigations of unrelated symptoms. No new cancers were identified in this cohort between January 2004 and April 2007.
Conclusion  Double contrast barium enema is a safe screening tool following a '2-week rule' referral with CIBH. Following a report of no significant pathology, there is no need to arrange routine follow-up.     

The management of women with breast symptoms referred to secondary care clinics in Sheffield: implications for improving local services

Information was collected about 302 women referred for breast symptoms and seen in surgical outpatient or outreach clinics during one month at two hospitals in Sheffield. Three-quarters of the women (n = 244) were referred to specialist breast clinics, 22% (n = 70) were referred to general surgical clinics and 3% (n = 6) were referred to outreach clinics. The ages of the women ranged from 16 to 85 years with a mean and median age of 45 years. Some 200 women (66%) presented with a lump or lumpiness, 42 women (14%) presented with pain, 29 women (10%) had a skin and/or nipple problem, and the remaining 31 women (10%) were concerned about their family history or reported other symptoms. A total of 23 women (8%) were diagnosed as having cancer, 180 (60%) were diagnosed as having benign breast disease, and 99 (33%) were diagnosed as normal. Of the 23 women with cancer, 22 were over 40 years of age; 21 women presented with a lump, one presented with pain, and one presented with metastatic disease. The time required to reach a final clinical diagnosis varied from the same day as the clinic visit to 35 weeks, with a median time of 3 weeks. Surgeons assessed the appropriateness of GPs' referrals for 257 cases and judged that 122 (47%) could have been managed by a GP. The implications of the findings for the organisation of specialist outpatient clinics are discussed, and a categorisation of women as either urgent or routine cases is suggested.     

'Paper Clinics'- a model for improving delivery of outpatient colorectal services.

OBJECTIVES: The overburdening of colorectal out-patient clinics necessarily leads to delays in time from referral to consultation and subsequent clinic attendance. This study aimed to ascertain the feasibility of 'paper clinic' follow-up rather than all patients receiving a routine follow-up appointment following investigation. A more efficient outpatient follow-up process should reduce unnecessary follow-up, thereby facilitating the speedy investigation and diagnosis of patients through changes in clinic profiles. METHODS: From August 2001 all patients seen in the outpatient clinic of one (part time) Consultant colorectal surgeon, who required investigation, were prospectively recorded on a 'paper clinic' form. These patients were given the necessary test request forms but were not given a further outpatient appointment. The results of the investigations were reviewed, together with the patients' medical records at a formal fortnightly 'paper clinic' session carried out by the Consultant and Nurse Consultant, and a treatment plan derived. Patients then followed one of 5 follow-up pathways and were notified in writing with a copy to their GP. RESULTS: During a 24-month period a total of 897 patients were reviewed using the 'paper clinic' follow-up system. Of these, 285 (31.8%) patients were discharged without further follow-up. In a given 3-month period when the clinic was well established, 152 patients were reviewed, of whom 27% were discharged from follow-up, 17% received SOS appointments, 13% required further investigation (and consequently were returned to 'paper clinic' follow-up), and 7% received Nurse led follow-up. In this 3-month period 64% of patients reviewed by 'paper clinic' follow-up did not return to Surgical Outpatient's and 12% received a Surgical Outpatient appointment for review. CONCLUSION: 'Paper clinic' follow-up is an effective and feasible follow-up alternative, resulting in a major decrease in outpatient follow-up burden. This has allowed the redesign of the outpatient clinic profile allowing for an increase in new urgent slots, and more rapid clinic follow up review of those patients who need it. Re-design and rationalization of existing services can result in considerable service improvement. Expanding clinics should not be considered the only option when faced with capacity and demand issues.     

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the surgery of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) was performed on 83 patients with 99 pancreatic pseudocysts (PCP). ERP was successful in 76 patients; in the other seven PCPs were found at operation. Five characteristic ductal patterns are described and illustrated. The PCPs were situated in the head (51 patients), body (21 patients), tail (20 patients). Thirteen PCPs were less than 2 cm, 50 were between 2 and 5 cm, 29 greater than 5 cm. There were multiple PCPs in 13.2% of patients. ERP was a more accurate diagnostic measure than ultrasonography or upper gastrointestinal roentgenograms, revealing the lesion in 89% of patients. Eight patients with pancreatic ascites had the causative PCP demonstrated prior to operation. Three patients had pancreatic pleural effusions; two with effusions on the right had PCPs of the tail. Five patients had spontaneous connections between a PCP and the stomach (four patients) or duodenum (one patient). Rational surgical planning for the management of PCPs is greatly facilitated by preliminary reconnaisance by ERP.     

Implications of sub-specialisation on the waiting times of general surgical clinics.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy around sub-specialisation in a district general hospital (DGH) has been ongoing for years. AIM: To study the effect of colorectal sub-specialisation on general surgical cases. METHODS: A retrospective audit between October 2002 and September 2003, including all referrals to the outpatient clinics of a single consultant surgeon in a DGH. RESULTS: 1,055 patients were seen in outpatient clinics, of which 53% (563) were seen in rapid access colorectal clinics. Overall, 87% (914) of patients were diagnosed to have colorectal pathology. The majority of the colorectal cases were referred using the designated referral forms. There were 427 urgent, 162 soon and 325 routine referrals with colorectal pathology, and 35 urgent, 22 soon and 84 routine referrals with non-colorectal pathology. Median waiting times for urgent, soon and routine referrals were 12, 61 and 91 days, respectively, for patients with colorectal pathology, in comparison with 44, 75 and 397 days for non-colorectal pathology. CONCLUSION: This audit confirms that colorectal sub-specialisation has resulted in a significant delay in the management of patients with non-colorectal diseases. This has major implications within a DGH setting.     

Transitioning young adults from paediatric to adult care and the HIV care continuum in Atlanta,Georgia, USA: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction : The transition from paediatric to adult HIV care is a particularly high‐risk time for disengagement among young adults; however, empirical data are lacking. Methods : We reviewed medical records of 72 youth seen in both the paediatric and the adult clinics of the Grady Infectious Disease Program in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, from 2004 to 2014. We abstracted clinical data on linkage, retention and virologic suppression from the last two years in the paediatric clinic through the first two years in the adult clinic. Results : Of patients with at least one visit scheduled in adult clinic, 97% were eventually seen by an adult provider (median time between last paediatric and first adult clinic visit = 10 months, interquartile range 2–18 months). Half of the patients were enrolled in paediatric care immediately prior to transition, while the other half experienced a gap in paediatric care and re‐enrolled in the clinic as adults. A total of 89% of patients were retained (at least two visits at least three months apart) in the first year and 56% in the second year after transition. Patients who were seen in adult clinic within three months of their last paediatric visit were more likely to be virologically suppressed after transition than those who took longer (Relative risk (RR): 1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–2.9; p = 0.03). Patients with virologic suppression (HIV‐1 RNA below the level of detection of the assay) at the last paediatric visit were also more likely to be suppressed at the most recent adult visit (RR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.34–3.9; p = 0.002). Conclusions : Retention rates once in adult care, though high initially, declined significantly by the second year after transition. Pre‐transition viral suppression and shorter linkage time between paediatric and adult clinic were associated with better outcomes post‐transition. Optimizing transition will require intensive transition support for patients who are not virologically controlled, as well as support for youth beyond the first year in the adult setting.     

Implementation of a systematic tobacco treatment protocol in a surgical outpatient setting: a feasibility study

BackgroundSmoking cessation programs started as late as 4 weeks before surgery reduce perioperative morbidity and death, yet outpatient clinic interventions are rarely provided. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a tobacco treatment protocol designed for an outpatient surgical setting.MethodsWe completed a pre–post feasibility study of the implementation of a systematic, evidence-based tobacco treatment protocol in an outpatient colorectal surgery clinic. Outcomes included smoking prevalence, pre- and postimplementation smoker identification and intervention rates, recruitment, retention, smoking cessation and provider satisfaction.ResultsPreimplementation, 15.5% of 116 surveyed patients were smokers. Fewer than 10% of surveyed patients reported being asked about smoking, and none were offered any cessation intervention. Over a 16-month postimplementation period, 1198 patients were seen on 2103 visits. Of these, 950 (79.3%) patients were asked smoking status on first visit and 1030 (86.0%) were asked on at least 1 visit. Of 169 identified smokers, 99 (58.6%) were referred to follow-up support using an opt-out approach. At 1-, 3- and 6-month follow- up, intention-to-quit rates among 78 enrolled patients were 24.4%, 22.9% and 19.2%, respectively. Postimplementation staff surveys reported that the protocol was easy to use, that staff would use it again and that it had positive patient responses.ConclusionImplementation of our smoking cessation protocol in an outpatient surgical clinic was found to be feasible and used minimal clinic resources. This protocol could lead to increases in identification and documentation of smoking status, delivery of smoking cessation interventions and rates of smoking reduction and cessation.     

Prevalence of anorectal dysfunction in women attending health care services

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of different bowel symptoms (constipation, faecal incontinence and faecal evacuation dysfunction) and associated urinary symptoms in women attending health care services. All women attending colposcopy clinics and general gynaecology clinics in a district general hospital in the southwest of England were invited to participate in the study. In addition, women attending the local family planning clinic were also recruited. Women attending these clinics routinely completed a history sheet and were asked to complete the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire. Two hundred women participated in the study: 116 (64.4%) had at least one bowel symptom from the list in the questionnaire and 57 (31.6%) of women thought they had a bowel problem but only 26 (14.4%) consulted their family doctor regarding the problem while four (2.2%) were referred for specialist opinion. Six were unsure about their bowel symptoms. There were 46 (25.5%) of women who had constipation, 99 (55%) had faecal incontinence and 97 (53.8%) complained of faecal evacuation dysfunction. Only 48 (26.6%) of women were free of any bowel complaint. One patient with faecal incontinence discussed her problem with her midwife but no further action was taken as she was too embarrassed to discuss it with her doctor. Seventy-eight (43.3%) of patients had urinary symptoms. Fifty-five (30.5%) thought they had a urinary problem but only 29 (16.1%) consulted their doctor and 17 (9.4%) were referred for specialist opinion. Sixty-one (33.8%) of those who admitted to have urinary incontinence also had faecal incontinence. Forty-nine (27.2%) of the patients were free of all symptoms. The mode of delivery as well as previous surgery did not have any influence on urinary incontinence nor on anal incontinence. This study has demonstrated a high prevalence of bowel symptoms in women attending health care services.     

Breast disease and the general surgeon. I. Referral of patients with breast problems.

OBJECTIVES--To determine the proportion of all new and follow-up patients referred to general surgical outpatient clinics with breast problems. To ascertain how long these patients wait for an appointment and how many require investigation or admission for operation. To review our management of patients with breast problems in the clinic and to determine the ratio of benign breast disease to malignancy. DESIGN--A 3-month prospective outpatient survey with patient details recorded on questionnaires completed by the medical staff. SETTING--The general surgical outpatient clinics of this firm at Battle Hospital, Reading, and Newbury District Hospital, Berkshire. PATIENTS--Those patients attending the above clinics during the 3-month period 1 October to 31 December 1989. RESULTS--In all, 693 new patients and 554 follow-up patients were seen. Of the new patients, 119, and of the follow-up patients 140 were seen for a breast complaint. At Battle Hospital 16% of all new patients presented with a breast problem, while at Newbury Hospital the figure was 24%. Of the follow-up patients at Battle Hospital, 23% were seen for a breast problem, and 41% at Newbury. The overall median waiting time for a new outpatient appointment was 21 days. No investigations were needed in 22% of the patients. The remaining 93 patients had investigations and a total of 70 mammograms and 53 fine needle aspirations for cytology were performed. The mean cost of investigations per patient investigated was estimated at 27 pounds. Of new patients, 58% were discharged from the clinic after a single consultation, and investigations as necessary. In 79% of the patients admitted for an operation, the decision to admit was made on the basis of the initial history and examination alone. Of new patients, 84% did not need admission and were managed in the clinic. In all, 14 breast carcinomas were diagnosed--12% of new patients with breast problems. CONCLUSIONS--The figures suggest that 24% of new patients and 41% of follow-up patients attending a general surgical clinic are seen for a breast problem. The waiting time for new appointments is unacceptably long. Most new patients do not require admission for an operation. Only 12% of new patients referred with a breast problem were found to have a carcinoma.     

Experience with a one-stop colorectal clinic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colorectal services have traditionally been arranged for the convenience of hospitals rather than patients. This model is not ideal, particularly for minor interventions and diagnostic procedures. In order to address this a one-stop colorectal clinic was set up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly clinics ran from 6.00 to 9.30 p.m. on Wednesdays for a period of 6 months. Patients with rectal bleeding, altered bowel habit, anorectal symptoms and those requesting screening advice were seen by a consultant or specialist registrar. Patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire at the end of their clinic attendance. RESULTS: 197 patients were seen in 17 clinics; 134 underwent proctoscopy, 72 had a rigid sigmoidoscopy and 85 had a flexible sigmoidoscopy carried out. Twenty-four patients subsequently had a barium enema and 3 were listed for colonoscopy. The main diagnosis was haemorrhoids (n = 104); 14 colorectal neoplasms were discovered (5 cancers and 9 polyps). During the study period the number of patients waiting for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy fell from 119 to 63; 2 months after ending the pilot scheme, the number had risen to 108. CONCLUSION: The clinic was found to have significantly improved patient care. The majority of patients were satisfied with an evening clinic. Flexible sigmoidoscopy without sedation was well tolerated and the ability to perform this at initial assessment had a marked effect on the number of patients awaiting lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.     

Maximizing use of a surgical clinic for referrals of patients having back problems.

OBJECTIVE: To determine ways to improve the delivery of service in a surgical clinic, based on the outcome of surgical consultations for back pain. DESIGN: A prospective outcome study. SETTING: A university teaching hospital providing secondary and tertiary care. PATIENTS: One hundred and forty-two consecutive patients who presented to surgical clinics for assessment of a back problem between Apr. 14 and May 30, 1996. INTERVENTIONS: Surgeons determined the diagnosis and visit outcome; data were tabulated objectively by a third-party researcher. OUTCOME MEASURES: Waiting time for consultation, presence of referral letter, third-party interests, diagnosis and visit outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of patients had chronic pain not amenable to surgery, 19% of patients were surgical candidates and were offered an operation, 13% were symptomatically improved to the point of not wanting an operation, 11% wanted a second opinion only, 10% had mechanical back pain appropriate for referral to physiotherapy, 9% had not undergone an adequate trial of nonoperative treatment when seen in the clinic and were given follow-up appointments, 5% were "no shows," 3.5% were seen for a medicolegal assessment, 3.5% wanted confirmation from a specialist that they did not need surgery and 1% had symptoms due to a vascular rather than a spinal cause and were referred to a vascular surgeon. CONCLUSION: Delivery of service could be improved by more rigorous screening to reassign appointment times of patients who have not had an adequate trial of nonoperative treatment, are improved or do not intend to keep their appointment.     

A one-stop vascular clinic: a practical proposition with non-invasive assessment.

One-stop clinics are becoming increasingly popular with both patients and their general practitioners. Traditionally, vascular patients have needed to attend hospital two or three times for clinical examination and investigations. We have introduced a one-stop clinic for patients with lower limb arterial disease (LLAD) and aortic aneurysms. In 92 clinics over 2 years, 1194 new patients and 1409 follow-up patients were seen, with LLAD being the largest single category comprising 40% of the patients seen, followed by varicose veins (25%), carotid disease (12%), and aortic aneurysms (8%). Overall, 57% of patients had non-invasive imaging performed, either in the clinic or on a separate visit. Performing all LLAD and aortic scans in the clinic requires 1.9 h of imaging time per clinic. Extending in-clinic scanning to patients with varicose veins and carotid disease would increase this to 3.9 h of scanning per clinic and require a duplex scanner and an additional technologist in the clinic.     

Evolution of the two-week rule pathway – direct access colonoscopy vs outpatient appointments: one year''s experience and patient satisfaction survey

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Direct access colonoscopy (DAC) vs outpatient appointments for two-week rule colorectal cancer referrals and to evaluate the satisfaction of patients referred through these routes. Patients and methods Data were collected prospectively from January 2003 to December 2003 on patients who were referred for DAC or outpatient appointments at the discretion of the referring General practitioner via the Lower GI two-week rule pathway. A postal questionnaire was used to survey patient satisfaction. Results Six hundred and thirty-nine patients were referred via the two-week rule pathway; 188 patients underwent colonoscopy at their initial hospital visit and 19 (10.1%) colorectal cancers were diagnosed; 442 patients had an outpatient appointment and 32 (7.2%) colorectal cancers were identified. There were 7 (1%) inappropriate referrals and 2 patients refused investigations. All outcome parameters measured were reduced for patients referred directly for colonoscopy including time to definitive investigations (Median 9 vs 52 days P < 0.0001), time to histological diagnosis (Median 14 vs 42 days P < 0.0001) and time to treatment (Median 55 vs 75 days P < 0.0483). One hundred and seventy patients were surveyed by the postal questionnaire of whom 127 (75%) responded. Ninety-eight percent of patients were satisfied with the service provided. Four (6.6%) of 60 patients who had undergone direct access colonoscopy expressed a desire to be seen at the outpatient department initially. Conclusions Direct access colonoscopy results in significantly reduced times to histological diagnosis and definitive treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients can be directly admitted for investigations bypassing the outpatient clinic without affecting patient satisfaction.     

Colorectal patients and cardiac arrhythmias detected on the surgical high dependency unit.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical high dependency unit (SHDU) care is becoming an integral feature of colorectal surgical practice. Routine ECG monitoring is a feature of surgical care in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of cardiac arrhythmias detected in an SHDU population of colorectal patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 226 patients over a 12 month period were admitted to a 6-bedded SHDU under the care of 3 colorectal surgeons. A total of 29 patients (13%) had significant arrhythmias on ECG monitoring (median age 74 years, range 35-88 years). Pre-existing ischaemic heart disease was present in 9 patients--colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease accounted for the underlying problem in the majority of these patients. RESULTS: Equal numbers of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias were detected--atrial fibrillation being the most commonly detected abnormality. Therapeutic intervention (electrolyte correction and anti-arrhythmic agents) was required in 23 patients. One patient required DC shock for ventricular fibrillation. Seven patients were transferred to the heart care unit or intensive care unit to manage their cardiac problems. Two patients died as a result of their cardiac problem, 27 were discharged home alive--3 on long-term anti-arrhythmic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative environment of colorectal patients has been radically altered by the introduction of the SHDU. If colorectal surgeons are to remain central to the postoperative care of their patients, all surgical staff will require training in the recognition and protocol prevention and management of cardiac arrhythmias. Certification of colorectal surgeons in advanced life support is more relevant to colorectal surgery than certification in trauma care.     

Das Kurzdarmsyndrom in Deutschland

Objective

As data about prevalence and standard of care in short bowel syndrome (SBS) are not available for Germany, this study estimated the prevalence and assessed the medical infrastructure to potentially improve care of SBS patients.

Methods

In a validated approach for prevalence estimation in rare diseases, a randomized census of 478 size-stratified hospitals with surgical, internal medicine and pediatric departments was conducted to estimate SBS prevalence. The number of SBS patients, specialized outpatient clinics and caregiver expertise were assessed.

Results

The response rate was 85?% of randomized hospitals (405/478). Strata-derived estimation yielded a total of 2,808 SBS patients in Germany for 2011/2012 (95?% CI: 1750.3865), translating into a prevalence estimation for 34/million inhabitants (95?% CI: 21.47). Overall expertise in SBS treatment was only rated “satisfactory” by most caregivers. While 86 specialized outpatient clinics were identified, there was no central registry to access these resources.

Conclusion

Short bowel syndrome, with a newly estimated prevalence of 34/million inhabitants is not a very rare medical condition in Germany. The interdisciplinary approach needed for optimal care for SBS patients would be greatly facilitated by a central registry.