Serum levels of cystatin C in patients with malignancy

Background Serum levels of cystatin C have been proposed to be an ideal marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, some reports have shown that serum levels of cystatin C increase independently of GFR. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of cystatin C in monitoring GFR, especially in patients with a malignancy. Method Study subjects consisted of 82 patients with a malignancy, 39 patients with a non-malignancy, 31 healthy volunteers, and 206 patients with various degrees of renal function. We measured serum cystatin C, β2-microglobulin (β2mG), and creatinine (CRE) levels in all patients. Serum CRP levels were measured in 21 patients with a malignancy and 28 patients with a non-malignancy whose creatinine clearance (Ccr) was ≥70 ml/min. Cystatin C, β2mG, and CRP were measured by immune nephelometry and CRE was measured by an enzyme assay. Results In patients with a malignancy, regression analysis yielded the equation: 1/cystatin C = 0.06 × Ccr + 0.710, correlation coefficient, r, of 0.33. The r was significantly lower than in patients with various degrees of renal function. There were no significant differences when the r performed on β2mG and CRE was compared between the same groups of patients. In 74 patients with a malignancy, in whom serum CRE levels were ≤1.1 mg/dl, increased levels of cystatin C were observed in 25 patients and increased levels of β2mG were observed in 39 patients. In comparing patients with a malignancy and a non-malignancy, the number of patients with an increased level of cystatin C, despite a Ccr ≥ 70 ml/min (8/33) or a CRE ≤ 1.1 mg/dl (13/41), was larger in the former group than the latter group, although the result was not statistically significant. Similarly, the number of patients with an increased level of β2mG, despite a Ccr ≥ 70 ml/min or a CRE ≤ 1.1 mg/dl was significantly larger in the former group compared to the latter group. Regression analysis between the serum levels of cystatin C and CRP in patients with a malignancy whose Ccr were ≥70 ml/min had a weak correlation (r = 0.31). Conclusion The results of our study suggest that the serum levels of cystatin C are not always a reliable marker of the GFR in patients with a malignancy, probably in relation to its nature as a cysteine protease inhibitor.     

Comparison of serum cystatin C and creatinine levels in determining glomerular filtration rate in children with stage I to III chronic renal disease

Abstract

Background: Pediatric studies are relatively scarce on the superiority of cystatin C over creatinine in estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study measured cystatin C and serum creatinine levels, and compared GFR estimated from these two parameters in patients with chronic renal disease. Methods: This prospective, observational, controlled study included 166 patients aged 1–18 years diagnosed with stage I to III chronic renal disease, and 29 age- and sex-matched control subjects. In all patients, GFR was estimated via creatinine clearance, Schwartz formula, Zappitelli 1 and Zappitelli 2 formula and the results were compared using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Patients and controls did not differ with regard to height, body weight, BMI, serum creatinine and serum cystatin levels, and Schwartz formula-based GFR (p?>?0.05). There was a significant relationship between creatinine and cystatin C levels. However, although creatinine levels showed a significant association with age, height, and BMI, cystatin C levels showed no such association. ROC analysis showed that cystatin C performed better than creatinine in detecting low GFR. Conclusion: Cystatin C is a more sensitive and feasible indicator than creatinine for the diagnosis of stage I to III chronic renal disease.     

Cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in pediatric patients

Cystatin C is a non-glycated 13-kilodalton basic protein produced by all nucleated cells. The low molecular mass and the basic nature of cystatin C, in combination with its stable production rate, suggest that the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the major determinant of cystatin C concentration in the peripheral circulation. Recently published studies have shown that cystatin C correlates more strongly than creatinine with GFR measured using the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum cystatin C as a marker for GFR in children. GFR was determined on medical indications using the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA technique in pediatric patients (2–16 years) in our renal unit. Simultaneously their cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were also measured. Of our 52 patients, 19 had a reduced renal function (<GFR 89 ml/min per 1.73 m²) based on the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance. The correlation of cystatin C with the isotopic measurement of GFR tended to be stronger (r=0.89, P=0.073) than that of creatinine (r=0.80). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was better (P=0.037) than that of creatinine in discriminating between subjects with normal renal function and those with reduced GFR. This study demonstrates that serum cystatin C has an increased diagnostic accuracy for reduced GFR when compared with serum creatinine. Hence, cystatin C seems to be an attractive alternative for the estimation of GFR in children. Received: 13 May 1998 / Revised: 22 September 1998 / Accepted: 22 October 1998     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous parameter of the renal function in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a proteinase inhibitor with a low molecular weight. The serum levels of cystatin C are mainly dependent on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) making cystatin C an endogenous parameter of GFR. The aim of the study was to elucidate the applicability of serum cystatin C as a parameter of GFR in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function and to estimate a reference interval for serum cystatin C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients (25 males and 21 females) aged 22 to 83 years with various kidney diseases and 250 blood donors (164 males and 86 females) aged 19 to 64 years were included. Cystatin C was measured by an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay, serum creatinine by an enzymatic and by Jaffé method, urine creatinine by an enzymatic method, and GFR by 99mTc-DTPA clearance. RESULTS: Serum levels ofcystatin C and creatinine showed increments with decreasing values of 99mTc-DTPA clearance and a linear relationship was found between 99mTc-DTPA clearance and l/serum cystatin C, l/serum creatinine (enzymatic method), and creatinine clearance. Comparison of the non-parametric receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots for serum cystatin C (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.996; SE = 0.005), serum creatinine (enzymatic method) (AUC = 0.899; SE = 0.044), serum creatinine (Jaffé method) (AUC = 0.870; SE = 0.051), measured creatinine clearance (AUC = 0.959; SE = 0.025), and estimated creatinine clearance (0.950; SE = 0.029) revealed significant differences for serum cystatin C and serum creatinine (enzymatic and Jaffé method) (p values: 0.03 and 0.01). No significant differences were demonstrated between serum cystatin C and measured and estimated creatinine clearance (p value: 0.14 and 0.12). The non-parametric reference interval for serum cystatin C was calculated to be 0.51-1.02 mg/l (median: 0.79 mg/l; range: 0.33 - 1.07 mg/l). CONCLUSION: Serum cystatin C seems to be a better parameter of GFR than serum creatinine in adults with various types of kidney disease with normal to moderately impaired kidney function.     

Serum cystatin C reliably detects renal dysfunction in patients with various renal diseases

A clinical investigation was conducted to clarify the reliability and efficacy of serum cystatin C measurement for estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Two hundred twelve patients with various renal diseases enrolled in the study. All patients were evaluated for 24-hour creatinine clearance (24 h C(Cr)) and the standard sodium thiosulfate clearance test (C(Thio)) within a week of blood sample collection. Serum cystatin C concentration was determined by a particle-enhanced immunonephelometry method. C(Thio) and 1/cystatin C, 24 h C(Cr), 1/beta2-microglobulin and 1/creatinine were well correlated. The correlation coefficients for C(Thio) obtained by 24 h C(Cr) and 1/cystatin C were comparable to each other (0.701 vs. 0.679). Receiver-operated characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that 24 h C(Cr) showed the highest area under the curve when C(Thio) = 60 ml/min or C(Thio) = 100 ml/min were applied as the discrimination point. However, the ROC value obtained by cystatin C was slightly greater than 24 h C(Cr) when C(Thio) = 80 ml/min was used as the discrimination point. Patient age, gender, glucose tolerance, presence of proteinuria, systemic inflammation, lupus, or systemic use of steroids did not interfere in the relationship between C(Thio) and 1/cystatin C. In conclusion, serum cystatin C measurement is an excellent diagnostic test for detecting patients with subclinical renal dysfunction.     

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant patients using serum cystatin C

AIM: Serum cystatin C (SCysC) has been proposed as a better marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than serum creatinine (Scr). However, few data are available in renal transplant patients, especially, during the early postoperative phase. METHODS: Thirty-nine renal transplant patients (22 men/17 women) were recruited for determination of SCysC and Scr before operation, at 1 week and at 4 weeks after operation. SCysC was determined by particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay. Creatinine clearance (Ccr) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: SCysC and Scr levels significantly decreased with the recovery of allograft function. SCysC showed a significant correlation with Scr and Ccr. The relationship between SCysC and Scr showed a positive correlation (r = .849 preoperation, and r = .940 postoperation). The relationship between SCysC and Ccr revealed a negative correlation (r = .857 preoperation, and r = .876 postoperation). At the Ccr level of 50 to 80 mL/min/1.73 m(2), the correlation between SCysC and Ccr (r = .778) was significantly better than that between Scr and Ccr (r = .553; P = .032). The concentration of SCysC was not affected by age, gender, height, body weight, hemoglobin, serum protein, glucose, or mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine dosage. However, corticosteroids slightly increased the level of SCysC and cyclosporine (CsA) decreased it. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for SCysC and Scr are 0.964 and 0.915, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Although the concentration may be slightly influenced by prednisolone and CsA, SCysC is more sensitive than Scr to detect early and moderate deterioration of GFR in adult renal transplant recipients.     

应用血清西司他汀浓度测定肾小球滤过率的相关研究

目的：提供临床上准确，简便测定肾小球滤过率的方法。方法：应用乳胶颗粒增强比浊法（PET）测定79例有肾脏损害患者血清西司他汀（cystatin C)浓度，同时测定血尿素氮（BUN），血肌酐（Scr),24h肌清除率（24h Ccr)和采用Cockcroft-Cault公式计算肌酐清除率（Ccockcroft)，结果除BUN外，以上指标与cystatin C均有相关关系，并有显著性意义。结论：cystatin C浓度检测在临床上提供一种快速，准确和简捷的测定肾小球滤过率的方法，能发现早期肾脏损害和肾功能改变。     

Is Serum Cystatin C an Accurate Endogenous Marker of Glomerular Filteration Rate for Detection of Early Renal Impairment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?

Background. Researches have recently reported that serum cystatin C is a more sensitive marker of changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than serum creatinine. We conducted this study to evaluate the significance of serum cystatin C as a more sensitive marker of GFR for early detection of renal impairment in special groups of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods. The present study included 40 patients with type 2 DM divided into four equal groups based on their urinary albumin excretion and renal function: group 1 was normoalbuminuric, group 2 was microalbuminuric, group 3 was macroalbuminuric, and group 4 was macroalbuminuric with renal dysfunction. All patients underwent a thorough history, full clinical examination, fasting, and renal function tests. Post-prandial blood glucose levels, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), proteins, albumin in 24 hr urine, and serum cystatin C were collected. Results. Serum cystatin C and creatinine were significantly higher in macrolbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients with renal dysfunction (group 4: 2.26 ± 1.28, 4.21 ± 2.38 mg/dl, respectively; p < 0.001) than macrolbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function (group 3: 1.04 ± 0.24, 0.96 ± 0.20 mg/dl, respectively), the microalbuminuric group (0.87 ± 0.28, 0.71 ± 0.12 mg/dl, respectively), as well as the normoalbuminuric group (0.55 ± 0.41, 0.60 ± 0.18 mg/dl, respectively). ROC plots demonstrated that area under the curve (AUC) of cystatin C (0.74) was greater than that for creatinine clearance (cr.cl) (0.67) and serum creatinine (s‐cr) (0.74); therefore, the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of cystatin c was better than cr. cl., and both were better than s-cr. Serum cystatin C showed significant correlation in groups 2–4 with s-cr, cr.cl, and 24 hr urine albumin, but no correlation was found in group 1. Conclusion. Serum cystatin C is a reliable and easily performed marker for GFR to detect renal impairment in patients with type 2 DM.     

Cystatin C: efficacy as screening test for reduced glomerular filtration rate

Serum cystatin C, a cysteine proteinase inhibitor, has been proposed as a marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Serum cystatin C, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were measured in 226 patients with various nephropathies, covering the entire range of renal function, to evaluate the efficacy of cystatin C as a screening test to detect reduced creatinine clearance in comparison to creatinine. Subgroups of 53 patients with glomerular and 26 patients with tubular impairment were compared to assess whether cystatin C performed differently in either glomerular or tubular impairment. Cystatin C detected reduced creatinine clearance with higher sensitivity (97 vs. 83%), and higher negative predictive value (96 vs. 87%) compared to creatinine. In parallel, 95% sensitivity of cystatin C as derived from receiver-operating characteristic plot was significantly higher (p < 0.05). In the subgroups with glomerular or tubular impairment, cystatin C and creatinine did not significantly differ with regard to efficacy. Serum cystatin C is as efficacious as serum creatinine to detect reduced GFR as measured by creatinine clearance. The efficacy of cystatin C as a screening test may even be superior compared to creatinine. In addition, the efficacy of cystatin C is independent of either glomerular or tubular impairment.     

Glomerular and tubular functions in children with different forms of beta thalassemia

Abstract

Background: Although there are many available data about renal involvement in patients with beta thalassemia major (TM), the changes in renal functions of other types, such as thalassemia intermedia (TI) and thalassemia minor (TMin), were reported less. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate renal tubular and glomerular functions in patients with three types of beta thalassemia. Methods: This prospective case–control study was conducted on 118 beta-thalassemia patients (49 in TM, 18 in TI and 51 TMin) and 51 healthy controls. Glomerular functions [estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum cystatin C and urinary protein creatinine ratio] and tubular functions [fractioned sodium excretion (FENa), tubular reabsorption of phosphorus, urinary excretion of uric acid, levels of retinol-binding protein, alpha-1 macroglobulin (alpha-1M), and beta-2 microglobulin, calcium creatinine ratio] were assessed in all patients and controls. Results: The mean ages of the groups and controls at presentation were similar. Although GFR was similar in all patients and control groups, serum levels of cystatin C in patients with TM and TI were significantly higher compared to TMin and controls. Alpha-1M, FENa, urinary excretion of uric acid, and urine protein/creatinine ratio in TM and TI groups were significantly higher than the others. Mean cystatin C level was also higher in patients with TMin compared the controls. However, there were no significant differences according to all tubular and other glomerular functions between TMin and control groups. Conclusions: Although all types of beta thalassemia patients should be closely monitored to prevent further decrease in renal functions, the patients with TI should be considered to have a higher risk of glomerular and tubular deterioration as well as TM.     

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a marker of renal function in children with chronic kidney disease

Very few biomarkers exist for monitoring chronic kidney disease (CKD). We have recently shown that serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) represents a novel biomarker for early identification of acute kidney injury. In this study, we hypothesized that serum NGAL may also represent a biomarker for the quantitation of CKD. Forty-five children with CKD stages 2–4 were prospectively recruited for measurement of serum NGAL, serum cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by Ioversol clearance, and estimated GFR (eGFR) by Schwartz formula. Serum NGAL significantly correlated with cystatin C (r=0.74, P<0.000). Both NGAL and cystatin C significantly correlated with measured GFR (r=0.62, P<0.000; and r=0.71, P<0.000, respectively) as well as with eGFR (r=0.66, P<0.000 and r=0.59, P<0.000, respectively). At GFR levels of ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m², serum NGAL, cystatin C, and eGFR were all significantly correlated with measured GFR. However, in subjects with lower GFRs (<30 ml/min per 1.73 m²), serum NGAL levels correlated best with measured GFR (r=0.62), followed by cystatin C (r=0.41). We conclude that (a) both serum NGAL and cystatin C may prove useful in the quantitation of CKD, and (b) by correlation analysis, NGAL outperforms cystatin C and eGFR at lower levels of measured GFR.     

Serum cystatin C--a superior marker of rapidly reduced glomerular filtration after uninephrectomy in kidney donors compared to creatinine

AIMS: Acute renal failure (ARF), defined by a rapid decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is associated with high mortality. Early and accurate detection of decreasing GFR is critical to prevent the progression of ARF and to potentially improve its outcome. Serum creatinine, the conventional GFR marker, has major limitations. We prospectively evaluated whether serum cystatin C detected a rapid GFR decrease earlier and more accurately than serum creatinine. METHODS: In ten patients undergoing nephrectomy for living related kidney transplantation, serum creatinine and cystatin C were determined daily. The decrease of GFR was quantitated preoperatively by creatinine clearance and MAG3 scintigraphy. The GFR decrease was defined by a 50-100% increase of cystatin C or creatinine from preoperative values. Ten patients without renal impairment served as controls. RESULTS: Initially, patients had a creatinine clearance of 105 +/- 14 ml/min/1.73 m2. Due to nephrectomy, patients lost 45 +/- 3% of their renal function. Serum cystatin C significantly increased already one, serum creatinine two days after nephrectomy. Cystatin C demonstrated an increase by 50-100% 1.4 +/- 0.9 days earlier than creatinine (p = 0.009). Serum cystatin C performed well detecting the GFR decrease with higher diagnostic values compared to creatinine. This was indicated by a sensitivity of 50, 70 and 80% of cystatin C to detect the GFR decrease on the three days following nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin C detects rapid GFR decreases one to two days earlier than creatinine. Cystatin C is an early and accurate marker to detect rapid GFR decreases as in ARF.     

Evaluation of cystatin C with iohexol clearance in cardiac surgery

Background: Post‐operative renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery is not uncommon and can lead to adverse outcome. The ability to accurately monitor renal function is therefore important. Cystatin C is known to be a sensitive marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but it has not been fully evaluated in cardiac surgery. Iohexol clearance is considered a reliable reference method for the determination of GFR. The aim of this study is to, for the first time, evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plasma cystatin C compared with iohexol clearance in cardiac surgery. Methods: Twenty‐one patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery and on the second post‐operative day, an iohexol clearance was performed. Plasma cystatin C, plasma creatinine and plasma C‐reactive protein were determined before surgery and on the first, second, third and fifth post‐operative day. Estimated creatinine and cystatin C clearances were determined. Results: Post‐operative cystatin C and 1/cystatin C correlated strongly to iohexol clearance (r=?0.90 and 0.86) and so did creatinine and 1/creatinine (r=?0.83 and 0.78). Estimated creatinine clearance differed from iohexol clearance (P<0.01), whereas estimated cystatin C clearance did not differ from iohexol clearance (P=0.81). No correlation was found between C‐reactive protein and cystatin C. Conclusion: This study indicates that clearance estimations based on cystatin C are more accurate compared with estimations based on creatinine in determining GFR in cardiac surgery. Cystatin C has, in this study population, a stronger correlation to iohexol clearance than creatinine.     

Serum cystatin C as an index of renal function in kidney transplant patients

Management of renal transplant patients requires periodic measurement of renal function, which is usually assessed by measuring the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The most commonly used marker for GFR is serum creatinine, although muscle wasting and tubular secretion may lead to overestimation of the actual GFR. Serum concentrations of the low-molecular-weight proteins, cystatin C and beta(2)-microglobulin (B(2)M), may afford useful markers to determine a reduced GFR. We investigated whether these molecules provide reliable indicators of renal function in 75 renal transplant patients. Cystatin C and B(2)M correlated significantly with creatinine (r =.648, P <.05 and r =.578, P <.05, respectively). Inverse serum creatinine was superior to inverse cystatin C and inverse B(2)M when renal function equations were used (r =.95, P <.05, according to MDRD; r =.87, P <.05, according to Cockroft-Gault). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to quantitate the accuracy of the different markers to detect reduced GFR using a cutoff value of 70 mL/min. No significant difference between the areas under the ROC curves comparing cystatin C and B(2)M was observed; however, serum creatinine demonstrated a significantly greater value than cystatin C (.981 vs.724, P =.001). We conclude that serum creatinine is a more efficacious marker than serum cystatin C to assess renal function.     

Cystatin C is a suitable marker of glomerular function in children with cancer

Antineoplastic chemotherapy is associated with nephrotoxic side effects. Data on nephrotoxicity in childhood cancer are scanty, in part because of the difficulties in obtaining reliable markers of glomerular function. We used serum cystatin C (cysC) to assess glomerular function. CysC was compared with serum creatinine concentration (S_Cr), the endogenous creatinine clearence ( C _Cr), and the calculated Counahan formula ( C _Counahan) in children with leukemia and solid tumors. CysC was measured by particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay. Serum and urinary creatinine concentrations were determined by the Jaffé method. Samples were obtained from 258 children, including 92 receiving anticancer chemotherapy, 108 long-term survivors, 40 children without any renal disease, and 18 patients with chronic renal insufficiency. CysC of patients on current chemotherapy was assessed both before and after treatment. Significant correlations were found between cysC and S_Cr and between 1/cysC and C _Counahan. CysC increased significantly after cisplatin, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and multimodality treatment. Our results suggest that cysC measurement can be used to characterize glomerular function in children with cancer.     

Correlation between cystatin C- and renal scan-determined glomerular filtration rate in children with spina bifida

We report on the relationships between serum cystatin C level, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from a cystatin C-based prediction equation (that of Filler and Lepage), GFR calculated by the Schwartz formula and technetium 99m-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (⁹⁹Tc-DTPA)-determined GFR in 28 children with spina bifida. All children underwent measurement of height, weight, serum cystatin C level, and serum creatinine level at the time of their renal scan. The relationship between variables was assessed by Pearson correlation. Pearson correlation for the relationship between ⁹⁹Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the cystatin C-based equation was significant and higher than that of the relationship between ⁹⁹Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the Schwartz equation, which was not statistically significant. The correlation for Filler GFR was 0.42 (P = 0.03) and for Schwartz GFR was 0.21 (P = 0.28). Although we use renal scan determination of GFR as the best measure, and a creatinine-based formula as the most practical measure, perhaps a formula such as that published by Filler and Lepage, which is not dependent on anthropometric data, might be a more useful (and accurate) tool for establishing GFR in children with spina bifida.     

Cystatin C as a marker of early changes of renal function in Fabry nephropathy

BACKGROUND: A sensitive, feasible and reproducible marker for renal function is necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in Fabry nephropathy. Serum creatinine has some limitations and cystatin C has been proposed, in other nephropathies, as a useful marker of renal function. The use of cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was investigated in Fabry patients receiving ERT. METHODS: Renal function was evaluated with serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and estimated GFR (through Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD], Cockcroft-Gault [C&G] and Hoek formulae) in 21 Fabry patients receiving ERT with agalsidase alfa for 3 years and in 13 Fabry patients receiving agalsidase alfa for 4 years. RESULTS: During years of ERT while serum creatinine remained stable, cystatin C values showed a significant, increasing trend right from the first year of ERT. CONCLUSIONS: In Fabry disease, cystatin C is a sensitive and reliable marker of renal function, and it should be taken into account when evaluating GFR trends during ERT.     

Serum cystatin C is a more sensitive marker of glomerular function than serum creatinine

We determined the relationship between the levels of serum cystatin C or creatinine (s-Cr) and the grade of creatinine clearance (CCr) in patients with various glomerular diseases. Serum samples from 96 patients with glomerular diseases were obtained from our hospital. The levels of serum cystatin C were measured using the Dade Behring Cystatin C assay with the automated Dade Behring Nephelometer II (BNII). CCr levels were classified into six groups according to the Guidelines of the Japanese Society of Nephrology as follows: grade 1 (normal renal function); grade 2 (slight decrease of renal function); grade 3 (moderate decrease of renal function); grade 4 (severe decrease of renal function); grade 5 (renal failure), and grade 6 (uremia). The mean levels of serum cystatin C in grade 3 patients were significantly higher than those in grade 1. The mean levels of serum cystatin C in grades 4, 5 and 6 patients were also significantly higher than those in grade 1. However, the mean levels of serum Cr in grade 3 patients were not significantly higher than those in grade 1. The levels of s-Cr in grades 4, 5 or 6 patients were significantly higher than those in grade 1. In this study, an increase of serum cystatin C levels occurred earlier than that of s-Cr in various glomerular diseases. It appears that the levels of serum cystatin C may provide early prognostic marker of patients with various glomerular diseases rather than the levels of s-Cr.     

Serum Cystatin C and β2-Microglobulin as Markers of Glomerular Filtration Rate

Continuous efforts have been made to find out precise and simple method for determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Cystatin C (cysteine proteinase inhibitor = CyC) is a low molecular weight (LMW) protein which is produced constantly by all nucleated cells independently of different pathological conditions and eliminated from the blood exclusively by glomeruli. So, CyC closely reflects the GFR. In the present study 75 patients aged between 18 and 74 (44.3 ± 12.2) years were analyzed, with the aim to compare the reciprocal values of serum level of LMW proteins CyC and β₂-microglobulin (β₂-MG) with creatinine clearance (Ccr) as a measure of GFR. Patients were divided into groups according to sex, age (<60; >60 years) and renal diseases: patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) with and without nephrotic proteinuria, pyelonephritis (PyN), and renal transplant (Tx). High correlation between Ccr and 1/CyC (r = 0.81; p<0.01) and Ccr and 1/β₂-MG (r = 0.80; p<0.01) in all examined patients was found. There was significant correlation between Ccr and 1/CyC (0.82 vs. 0.79) and Ccr and 1/β₂-MG (0.85 vs. 0.76) in men as well in women, and also in two groups of patients formed according to the age (0.82 vs. 0.77; p<0.01; 0.80 vs. 0.81; p<0.01), without any statistical significant difference between the groups. In studied groups with different renal diseases, there were no differences in correlation coefficients between Ccr and 1/CyC and Ccr and 1/β₂-MG (p1 = 0.29; p2 = 0.21; p3 = 0.79; p4 = 0.43), without statistical differences between the groups, except significant difference in correlation coefficients for Ccr and 1/β₂-MG between patients with GN with and without nephrotic proteinuria (p<0.032). LMW proteins, serum CyC and β₂-MG, are as good markers of GFR as Ccr, regardless sex and age. Both of these LMW proteins are good markers of GFR in patients with GN without nephrotic proteinuria, PyN and Tx patients. In patients with GN and nephrotic proteinuria serum CyC is a better marker of GFR than β₂-MG.     

Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin as a Marker of Renal Function in Non-Diabetic Patients with Stage 2–4 Chronic Kidney Disease

The current Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines advocate creatinine-based equations for estimating GFR to identify patients with potential kidney disease and classify them into different stages due to the fact that serum creatinine is very insensitive to changes in the glomerular filtration rate. Very few biomarkers exist for monitoring chronic kidney disease. The aim of the study was to assess whether NGAL could represent a novel, sensitive marker of kidney function in adult patients with CKD. The study was performed on 92 non-diabetic patients with CKD stages 2–4. Serum and urinary NGAL as well as serum cystatin C were measured using commercially available kits. Serum NGAL was related, in univariate analysis, to serum creatinine, urinary NGAL, hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocyte count, eGFR, and cystatin C. Urinary NGAL correlated with age, hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum creatinine, and eGFR. In multiple regression analysis, predictors of serum NGAL were creatinine (beta value = 0.97, p = 0.005), cystatin C (beta = 0.34, p = 0.01), and eGFR (beta value = 1.77, p = 0.001). In the healthy volunteers, serum NGAL correlated with age, serum creatinine, eGFR, leukocyte count, and cystatin C. Taking into consideration the fact that the recent DOQI (Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative) states that individuals with reduced GRF (glomerular filtration rate) are at greater risk for CVD and cardiac deaths, precise evaluation of renal function is important in order to select the appropriate strategy to reduce the cardiovascular risk. NGAL should be investigated as a potential early and sensitive marker of kidney impairment/injury.