Benefits of pravastatin on cardiovascular events and mortality in older patients with coronary heart disease are equal to or exceed those seen in younger patients: Results from the LIPID trial

BACKGROUND: The effect of cholesterol-lowering therapy on death from coronary heart disease in older patients with previous coronary heart disease and average cholesterol levels is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative and absolute effects of pravastatin on cardiovascular disease outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease who are 65 years of age or older with those in patients 31 to 64 years of age. DESIGN: Subgroup analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 87 centers in Australia and New Zealand. PATIENTS: 3514 patients 65 to 75 years of age, chosen from among 9014 patients with previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina and a baseline plasma cholesterol level of 4.0 to 7.0 mmol/L (155 to 271 mg/dL). INTERVENTION: Pravastatin, 40 mg/d, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Major cardiovascular disease events over 6 years. RESULTS: Older patients were at greater risk than younger patients (31 to 64 years of age) for death (20.6% vs. 9.8%), myocardial infarction (11.4% vs. 9.5%), unstable angina (26.7% vs. 23.2%), and stroke (6.7% vs. 3.1%) (all P < 0.001). Pravastatin reduced the risk for all cardiovascular disease events, and similar relative effects were observed in older and younger patients. In patients 65 to 75 years of age, pravastatin therapy reduced mortality by 21% (CI, 7% to 32%), death from coronary heart disease by 24% (CI, 7% to 38%), coronary heart disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction by 22% (CI, 9% to 34%), myocardial infarction by 26% (CI, 9% to 40%), and stroke by 12% (CI, -15% to 32%). For every 1000 older patients treated over 6 years, pravastatin prevented 45 deaths, 33 myocardial infarctions, 32 unstable angina events, 34 coronary revascularization procedures, 13 strokes, or 133 major cardiovascular events, compared with 22 deaths and 107 major cardiovascular events per 1000 younger patients. Among older patients, the numbers needed to treat were 22 (CI, 17 to 36) to prevent one death from any cause, 35 (CI, 24 to 67) to prevent one death from coronary heart disease, and 21 (CI, 17 to 31) to prevent one coronary heart disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with coronary heart disease and average or moderately elevated cholesterol levels, pravastatin therapy reduced the risk for all major cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Since older patients are at greater risk than younger patients for these events, the absolute benefit of treatment is significantly greater in older patients.     

Aspirin in the primary prevention of angina pectoris in a randomized trial of United States physicians

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of low-dose aspirin (325 mg on alternate days) on the primary prevention of angina pectoris in the United States Physicians' Health Study. Despite a postulated role of platelets in atherogenesis and myocardial ischemia, the effect of chronic platelet inhibition on the development of clinical angina pectoris is unknown. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Physicians' Health Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 22,071 male physicians aged 40 to 84 years, free from previous myocardial infarction, stroke, and transient cerebral ischemia at entry, and followed for an average of 60.2 months. The 21,738 physicians who were also free from angina pectoris at baseline constituted the study population for the present analyses. RESULTS: During 106,652 person-years of follow-up, 331 patients with confirmed angina pectoris were diagnosed, 194 of whom underwent a coronary revascularization procedure (coronary artery bypass graft surgery or coronary angioplasty). As compared to participants assigned placebo, the relative risk of confirmed angina pectoris in the aspirin group was 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.38). For coronary revascularization, the relative risk was 1.19 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.59). After simultaneous control for other coronary risk factors in a proportional-hazards model, these relative risks remained near unity at 1.07 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.36) and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.52), respectively. When the risks of angina pectoris were examined according to year of randomization in the trial, there was no pattern of increasing benefit with longer duration of treatment. CONCLUSION: These randomized trial data indicate that chronic platelet inhibition with low-dose aspirin for an average duration of 60.2 months does not reduce the incidence of angina pectoris.     

小剂量阿司匹林对心血管病一级预防效果及安全性的系统评价

目的 系统评价小剂量阿司匹林在高危人群中一级预防心血管病的有效性和安全性.方法 计算机检索MEDLINE、EMbase、Cochrane图书馆(2008年第3期)、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊全文数据库,同时筛检了纳入文献的参考文献.收集小剂量阿司匹林(75～150 mg)一级预防心血管病的随机对照试验(RCT),2名评价员独立评价文献质量和提取资料,并采用RevMan4.2软件对资料进行荟萃分析.结果 共纳入6个研究(TPT,HOT,PPP,WHS,POPADAD,JPAD),72 466例患者.(1)小剂量阿司匹林总的心血管事件的发生率(RR=0.85,95% CI:0.80～0.92)、卒中发生率(RR=0.87,95% CI:0.77～0.98)、非致死性卒中发生率(RR=0.81,95%CI:0.70～0.95)、短暂脑缺血发作发生率(RR=0.76,95%CI:0.64～0.90)均低于安慰剂(均P＜0.05).(2)小剂量阿司匹林非致死性心肌梗死(RR=0.89,95%CI:0.77～1.02)、心血管性死亡(RR=0.98,95% CI:0.86～1.13)、全因死亡发生率(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.88～1.02)与安慰剂比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).(3)在老年人群中分析显示,小剂量阿司匹林冠心病的发生率低于安慰剂(RR=0.81,95%CI:0.70～0.94,P＜0.01).(4)在安全性方面,与安慰剂比较,小剂量阿司匹林有出血并发症的风险(RR=1.15,95%CI:1.12～1.18,P＜0.01),而在过敏反应方面差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 小剂最阿司匹林能降低总的心血管事件、短暂脑缺血发作、卒中、非致死性卒中的发生率;对降低非致死性心肌梗死、心血管性死亡、全因死亡方面效果不明显;在老年人群中小剂量阿司匹林能降低冠心病的发牛率;长期应用无明显过敏反应,但存在出血并发症的风险.     

Antithrombotic treatment and the incidence of angina pectoris

BACKGROUND: In primary prevention, anticoagulation with warfarin sodium to an international normalized ratio of 1.5 and 75 mg of aspirin per day each reduced the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD). Effects on the development of angina pectoris and total CHD (resulting from angina, myocardial infarction, and coronary death) have been assessed, particularly in light of recent evidence that warfarin may have a "durable effect" on CHD through effects on the pathologic condition of the vessel walls involved. METHODS: The Thrombosis Prevention Trial was carried out in 5499 men aged 45 through 69 years who were at increased risk of CHD. The trial was factorial, with 1 group taking active warfarin and active aspirin, 1 taking active warfarin and placebo aspirin, 1 taking placebo warfarin and active aspirin, and 1 taking double placebo treatment. In addition to those with myocardial infarction and coronary death, men developing angina pectoris after entry to the trial were identified. RESULTS: Warfarin appeared to reduce the incidence of stable angina by 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], -14 to 38), although not significantly (P =.26), while aspirin increased the incidence by 39% (95% CI, 0 to 91) (P =.05). The incidence of stable angina was 37% (95% CI, -1 to 60) less in those taking warfarin than in those taking aspirin (P =.05). Warfarin reduced total CHD by 18% (95% CI, 4 to 30) (P =.01), while the reduction due to aspirin was 8% (95% CI, -10 to 22) (P =.36). CONCLUSIONS: The results are compatible with the concept of a durable effect of warfarin on the chronic pathologic conditions underlying angina, although this has not been established with certainty. Further research is needed to confirm or refute our findings, because they carry potentially important implications for the primary prevention of CHD with the use of antithrombotic agents.     

Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended after coronary stenting to prevent thrombotic complications, yet the benefits and risks of treatment beyond 1 year are uncertain.Methods Patients were enrolled after they had undergone a coronary stent procedure in which a drug-eluting stent was placed. After 12 months of treatment with a thienopyridine drug(clopidogrel or prasugrel) and aspirin, patients were randomly assigned to continue receiving thienopyridine treatment or to receive placebo for another18 months; all patients continued receiving aspirin. The coprimary efficacy end points were stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) during the period from 12 to 30 months. The primary safety end point was moderate or severe bleeding.Results A total of 9961 patients were randomly assigned to continue thienopyridine treatment or to receive placebo.Continued treatment with thienopyridine, as compared with placebo, reduced the rates of stent thrombosis(0.4% vs. 1.4%; hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.17 to 0.48]; P 0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(4.3% vs. 5.9%; hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85];P 0.001). The rate of myocardial infarction was lower with thienopyridine treatment than with placebo(2.1% vs. 4.1%; hazard ratio, 0.47; P 0.001). The rate of death from any cause was 2.0% in the group that continued thienopyridine therapy and 1.5% in the placebo group(hazard ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.85];P = 0.05). The rate of moderate or severe bleeding was increased with continued thienopyridine treatment(2.5% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.001). An elevated risk of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction was observed in both groups during the 3 months after discontinuation of thienopyridine treatment.Conclusions Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after placement of a drug-eluting stent, as compared with aspirin therapy alone, significantly reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding.(Funded by a consortium of eight device and drug manufacturers and others; DAPT Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT00977938.)(From: N Engl J Med 2014; 371:2155-2166 December 4, 2014DOI: 10.1056 / NEJMoa1409312)     

Low-dose aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Objective

Many recommendations for aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease are based on analyses of all antiplatelet therapies at all dosages and in both stable and unstable patients. Our objective was to evaluate the benefit and risk of low-dose aspirin (50-325 mg/d) in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.

Methods

Secondary prevention trials of low-dose aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease were identified by searches of the MEDLINE database from 1966 to 2006. Six randomized trials were identified that enrolled patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI) (n = 1), stable angina (n = 1), or stroke/transient ischemic attack (n = 4). A random effects model was used to combine results from individual trials.

Results

Six studies randomized 9853 patients. Aspirin therapy was associated with a significant 21% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.88), 26% reduction in the risk of nonfatal MI (95% CI, 0.60-0.91), 25% reduction in the risk of stroke (95% CI, 0.65-0.87), and 13% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI, 0.76-0.98). Patients treated with aspirin were significantly more likely to experience severe bleeding (odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI, 1.4-3.4). Treatment of 1000 patients for an average of 33 months would prevent 33 cardiovascular events, 12 nonfatal MIs, 25 nonfatal strokes, and 14 deaths, and cause 9 major bleeding events. Among those with ischemic heart disease, aspirin was most effective at reducing the risk of nonfatal MI and all-cause mortality; however, among those with cerebrovascular disease, aspirin was most effective at reducing the risk of stroke.

Conclusion

In patients with stable cardiovascular disease, low-dose aspirin therapy reduces the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, and increases the risk of severe bleeding.     

Mutation in the promoter region of the beta-fibrinogen gene and the risk of future myocardial infarction, stroke and venous thrombosis.

AIM: Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the beta-fibrinogen gene are associated with increased plasma fibrinogen levels. We investigated whether the distribution of the C148T polymorphism is associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a nested case-control design, the distribution of the C148T polymorphism was investigated among 751 participants in the Physicians' Health Study who subsequently developed myocardial infarction, stroke or venous thromboembolism (cases) and among 751 age- and smoking-matched controls over follow-up of 8.6 years. Frequency of the T allele was similar among men who had myocardial infarction (22.7%, P=0.5), stroke (18.4%, P=0.2) or venous thromboembolism (17.0%, P=0.1) compared with those with no cardiovascular events (21.5%). The relative risk for any vascular event among men homozygous or heterozygous for the T allele compared with men homozygous for the C allele was 0.94 (95% CI 0.76-1.16). We found no evidence of an association between the T allele and myocardial infarction (relative risk 1.06; 95% CI 0.82-1.36), stroke (0.87, 0.63-1.21) or venous thromboembolism (0.75; 0.51-1.08). Analysis adjusted for aspirin use and traditional cardiovascular risk factors had no significant effect on these findings. CONCLUSION: In a large prospective cohort, carriage of the T allele for the C148T mutation in the beta-fibrinogen promoter gene was not associated with an increased subsequent risk of cardiovascular events.     

Clinical characteristics of nonfatal myocardial infarction among individuals on prophylactic low-dose aspirin therapy

BACKGROUND. The influence of prophylactic low-dose aspirin on the clinical characteristics of subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction was examined in the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day aspirin (325 mg) among 22,071 US male physicians. METHODS AND RESULTS. During 60.2 months of follow-up, 342 incident cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction were confirmed (95.2% of all reports): 129 on aspirin and 213 on placebo (p less than 0.00001). Despite this statistically extreme reduction in occurrence of a first nonfatal infarction attributable to aspirin, there were no significant differences in the size, location, electrocardiographic features, or postinfarction left ventricular ejection fraction between the aspirin and placebo groups. Furthermore, among those undergoing angiography, there were no differences in the distribution or number of coronary vessels obstructed. CONCLUSIONS. These data indicate that chronic platelet inhibition with alternate-day aspirin therapy reduces the risk of a first myocardial infarction but does not appear to have a significant effect on the clinical characteristics of events that are survived. This finding may result from a direct effect of aspirin or from an aspirin-induced shift in infarction severity. Regardless of mechanism, these clinical observations suggest that treatment decisions for acute infarction patients should be made independently of a history of aspirin use.     

The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial programme; rationale, design and baseline characteristics including a meta-analysis of the effects of thienopyridines in vascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Other than aspirin, there are few oral antithrombotic treatments with proven efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. In this report, we present the rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischaemic Events (CURE) trial, which includes a meta-analysis of the effects of thienopyridines in patients with vascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Combined data from randomized trials of thienopyrindines in patients with atherosclerotic disease demonstrated a 29% reduction in vascular events when compared with placebo/control (n=2392) (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86, P=0.0006) and a 10% reduction in vascular events when compared with aspirin (n=22 254) (OR 0.91, 95% Cl 0.84-0.99, P=0.039). Similarly, randomized trials of aspirin plus thienopyridines in patients undergoing intracoronary stenting, demonstrated a marked benefit of aspirin plus ticlopidine in reducing death or myocardial infarction compared with aspirin alone (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.49, P=0.0001) or aspirin plus warfarin (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.78, P=0.002). Whether these benefits extend to the much larger population of patients with acute coronary syndrome is unknown. CURE is an international, randomized, double-blind trial, in which patients with acute coronary syndrome will be randomized to receive either a bolus dose of clopidogrel (300 mg) followed by 75 mg per day for 3-12 months, or matching placebo. Both groups will receive aspirin. The co-primary efficacy end-points of CURE are: (1) the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke; and (2) the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or refractory ischaemia. CURE will recruit approximately 12 500 patients with acute coronary syndrome (from 28 countries) and its power to detect moderate treatment benefits will be in the region of 80-90%, while maintaining an overall type I error (alpha) of 0.05. The baseline characteristics of the study population are consistent with at least a moderate risk group of patients with acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials of thienopyridines in patients with vascular disease demonstrate that thienopyridines are effective in reducing vascular events when compared with placebo/control or aspirin, as well as when used in combination with aspirin in patients undergoing intracoronary stent implantation. The CURE trial is a large international study to determine if acute and long-term treatment with the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is superior to aspirin alone in patients with acute coronary syndrome.     

P2Y12 Inhibitors versus Aspirin Monotherapy for Long-term Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) need long-term antiplatelet therapy to decrease the risk of future ASCVD events. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through September 2021) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating P2Y₁₂ inhibitors vs aspirin for secondary prevention of ASCVD events. Seven RCTs including a total of 56,982 patients were included in this analysis. The median follow-up duration was 22.8 (IQR 12) months. When P2Y₁₂ inhibitors were compared with aspirin as long-term antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of ASCVD events, there was a significant decrease in the risk of myocardial infarction [RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.94], and stroke [RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99]. However, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality [RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.92-1.12], or cardiovascular mortality [RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.83-1.08] between P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and aspirin users. Additionally, there was no significant difference in major bleeding events [RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.74-1.04], or all bleeding events [RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.90-1.33] between P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and aspirin groups. Use of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy is associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction and stroke in ASCVD patients without any significant difference in mortality, or bleeding compared to aspirin monotherapy.     

Long-Acting Calcium Antagonists in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with coronary artery disease remains controversial, with reports of increased risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Short-acting CCBs have an unfavorable hemodynamic profile. The role of long-acting CCBs in patients with coronary artery disease is unknown.

Methods

MEDLINE/CENTRAL/EMBASE database were searched from 1966 to August 2008 for randomized controlled trials of long-acting CCBs in patients with coronary artery disease with follow-up for at least 1 year. We extracted from the studies the baseline characteristics and 6 outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, and heart failure.

Results

Of the 100 randomized controlled trials of CCBs in patients with coronary artery disease, 15 studies evaluating 47,694 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. When compared with the comparison group (including placebo), CCBs were not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.05), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.95-1.11), nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06), or heart failure (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71-1.05), and with a 21% reduction in the risk of stroke (95% CI, 0.70-0.89) and 18% reduction in the risk of angina pectoris (95% CI, 0.72-0.94). When compared with placebo, CCBs resulted in a 28% reduction in the risk of heart failure (95% CI, 0.73-0.92). The results were similar for both dihydropyridines and nondihydropyridine CCBs.

Conclusions

In patients with coronary artery disease, long-acting CCBs (either dihydropyridines or nondihydropyridines), were associated with a reduction in the risk of stroke, angina pectoris, and heart failure, with similar outcomes for other cardiovascular events as the comparison group.     

Antiplatelet therapy in cerebrovascular disease: implications of Management of Artherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients and the Clopidogrel for High Artherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance studies' results for cardiologists

Cardiovascular disease is prevalent among patients with stroke; thus, cardiologists frequently treat patients at high risk for stroke. Results from recent clinical trials of antiplatelet medications, given alone or in combination, may be of special interest to cardiologists. The MATCH study demonstrated no significant difference between clopidogrel alone and clopidogrel plus aspirin in reducing risk of vascular events after stroke or transient ischemic attack. A 1.3% increased risk of major bleeding was associated with clopidogrel plus aspirin. In CHARISMA, clopidogrel plus aspirin did not reach statistical significance vs. placebo plus aspirin in reducing incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes in patients with stable atherothrombotic disease; clopidogrel was associated with an increase in moderate bleeding. These results suggest that clopidogrel plus aspirin may be inappropriate as first-line therapy for secondary stroke prevention. In patients with established cardiovascular disease at risk for MI or other vascular events, physicians must weigh the benefits and risks before choosing this therapy. Selection of an antiplatelet agent must be based on patient history, including previous MI and stroke, susceptibility to bleeding, and other high-risk factors (e.g. advanced age and diabetes). Aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole may be more effective than clopidogrel for preventing stroke in high-risk patients. This article strives to put MATCH and CHARISMA results into context by providing an overview of antiplatelet therapy, including relevant clinical trial results, a review of current practice guidelines, and a summary of an ongoing study that will improve clinical decision making.     

Echocardiographic determination of left atrial function and its application for assessment of mitral flow velocity pattern

Forty-three patients presenting with unstable angina or myocardial infarction were randomised double blind to warfarin [target international normalised ratio (INR), 2.0 to 2.5] and aspirin (150 mg) daily or placebo plus aspirin (150 mg) daily. Coronary flow was assessed with the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC). Coronary artery flow was reduced (higher CTFC) at baseline in culprit arteries (mean +/-SD, 37.1+/-15.4 frames) compared to nonculprit arteries (22.5+/-6.7 frames, P<0.0001). In patients with a patent artery at follow-up, coronary flow was unchanged after ten weeks of warfarin and aspirin (-2.0+/-19.9 frames) or aspirin alone (3.8+/-10.4 frames, P = 0.20). Patients randomised to aspirin alone were more likely to progress to total occlusion [aspirin, 7 of 19 (37%) vs. warfarin and aspirin, 1 of 24 (4%); P = 0.01). Higher baseline culprit artery CTFC was also associated with an increased risk of late occlusion [+10 frames; odds ratio (OR), 1.65; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.33]. Coronary flow remained impaired ten weeks after presentation with myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Combination warfarin and aspirin therapy did not improve flow in vessels that remained patent but did reduce the risk of progression to occlusion.     

阿司匹林对糖尿病患者心脑血管事件一级预防的荟萃分析

目的 系统评价阿司匹林对糖尿病患者心脑血管事件一级预防的疗效及安全性.方法 电子检索数据席MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、维普数据库、中国期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库等,文献检索时间为建库至2009年7月,检索关键词包括阿司匹林、糖尿病、一级预防、心血管事件、心肌梗死、卒中,文献语种不限.检索纳入文献的参考文献.纳入阿司匹林降低糖尿病患者心脑血管并发症的所有前瞻性随机对照试验,评价纳入研究的方法学质量,并提取符合纳入标准的数据,采用RevMan 5.0软件进行荟专笔分析.结果 共纳入4项随机对照试验中的5883例糖尿病患者.荟萃分析结果显示:阿司匹林可使糖尿病患者卒中事件的发生率降低近30%(RR=0.71,95%CI为0.55～0.93,P=0.01),阿司匹林组与对照组主要心血管事件(RR=0.90,95%CI为0.77～1.04,P=0.15)及心肌梗死事件(RR=1.02,95%CI为0.78～1.32,P=0.90)无显著差异.阿司匹林对不同性别糖尿病患者主要心血管事件的影响无显著差异.阿司匹林可使糖尿病患者主要出血事件的发生风险增加4倍(RR=4.03,95%CI为2.09～7.78,P<0.0001),阿司匹林组与对照组心源性死亡事件(RR=0.85,95%CI为0.32～2.24,P=0.74)及全因死亡事件(RR=0.87,95%CI为0.47～1.61,P=0.67)无显著差异.结论 阿司匹林能显著降低糖尿病患者卒中事件的发生风险,增加出血事件的发生风险.     

An overview of the 4 randomized trials of aspirin therapy in the primary prevention of vascular disease

BACKGROUND: In the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, in contrast to the recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Heart Association, the US Food and Drug Administration recently stated that there was insufficient evidence to judge whether aspirin therapy decreases the risk of a first myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: To perform an overview of the 4 primary prevention trials of aspirin therapy to obtain the most reliable estimates of the effects of aspirin therapy on various vascular disease end points. METHODS AND RESULTS: These 4 trials included more than 51,000 subjects and 2284 important vascular events. Those assigned to aspirin therapy experienced significant reductions of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-41%) for nonfatal myocardial infarction and 13% (95% CI, 5%-19%) for any important vascular event. There were possible small but nonsignificant increases in risks of vascular disease-related death (1%; 95% CI, -12% to 16%) and nonfatal stroke (8%; 95% CI, -12% to 33%). When strokes were subdivided by type, there was no significant effect of aspirin therapy on the risk of ischemic stroke, but, while based on small numbers, there was a 1.7-fold apparent increase (95% CI, 6%-269%) in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, which did achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: For the primary prevention of vascular disease, aspirin therapy confers significant beneficial effects on first myocardial infarction and, as a result, on any important vascular event; these effects are clinically important. Whether there is any reduction in vascular disease-related death or stroke associated with treatment remains unclear because of inadequate numbers of events in the primary prevention trials completed to date. More data on hemorrhagic stroke are also needed. In addition, randomized trial data, especially in women but also in men, are needed to help to formulate a rational public health policy for individuals at usual risk. Meanwhile, these data provide evidence for a significant benefit of aspirin therapy in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction.     

纤维蛋白原与高敏C反应蛋白对稳定性冠心病患者心血管事件的预测价值

目的探讨高水平的纤维蛋白原（fibrinogen,FG）和高敏C反应蛋白（hs—CRP）对稳定性冠心病患者心血管事件的预测价值。方法对185例经冠状动脉造影检查证实的稳定性冠心病患者（2002年1月至11月入院患者）分别按FG、hs—CRP水平分组,随访3年,评估发生心血管事件（猝死、心肌梗死、慢性心力衰竭及其他心血管事件）。结果在3年的随访中,发生非致死性心血管事件21例和心血管原因导致的死亡10例。在调整了血脂、体重指数、吸烟、高血压等因素后,FG〉4．0g／L组与FG≤4．0g／L组比较,发生心血管事件的相对危险度为1．97,95％可信区间（CI）为1．68—2．40。hs—CRP〉3．0mg／L组与hs—CRP≤3．0mg／L比较,经调整后发生心血管事件的相对危险度为2．32,95％CI为1．76—2．89。FG〉4．0g／L伴hs—CRP〉3．0mg／L者与FG≤4．0g／L且hs—CRP≤3．0mg／L者比较,发生心血管事件的相对危险度为3．84（P〈0．05）,95％CI为2．80—4．99。结论FG和hs—CRP不仅均为冠心病患者心血管事件重要的独立预测因子,且FG联合hs—CRP检测可增加对冠心病患者心血管事件的预测价值。     

Uric acid and other renal function parameters in patients with stable angina pectoris participating in the ACTION trial: impact of nifedipine GITS (gastro-intestinal therapeutic system) and relation to outcome

BACKGROUND: Little data is available concerning the prognostic implications of renal function abnormalities, their evolution over time and the effects of nifedipine on such abnormalities in patients with stable angina pectoris. METHODS: The previously published ACTION trial compared long-acting nifedipine GITS 60 mg once daily to placebo among 7,665 patients. Standard laboratory tests including creatinine and uric acid were assessed at baseline, after 6 months, 2 and 4 years, and at the end of follow-up. We assessed the impact of nifedipine on markers of renal dysfunction and determined whether evidence of renal failure alters the impact of nifedipine on the clinical outcome of patients with stable angina. RESULTS: Uric acid was not while creatinine level and estimated creatinine clearance were potent conditionally independent predictors of total mortality and of cardiovascular clinical events. Relative to placebo, nifedipine reduced 6-month uric acid levels by 3% (P < 0.001) of the baseline value. This difference was maintained during long-term follow-up, was present both in normotensives and in hypertensives, and was not explained by differences in diuretic therapy or allopurinol use. Nifedipine had no effect on the occurrence of clinical renal failure. Relative to placebo, the effects of nifedipine on cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.17], any stroke or transient ischaemic attack (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88), new overt heart failure (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95), and the need for any coronary procedure (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) were consistent across strata of markers of renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in patients with stable angina, nifedipine reduces uric acid levels and does not affect other markers of renal dysfunction. Renal dysfunction does not alter the effects of nifedipine on clinical outcome.     

氯吡格雷与阿司匹林抗血小板治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者的系统评价

目的 系统评价氯吡格雷与阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,ST-AMI)患者的有效性和安全性. 方法 应用计算机检索美国国立生物医学信息中心PubMed医学数据库、荷兰医学文摘embase数据库、Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验数据库(2007年第3期)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中文科技期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普资讯网中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、万方医学数据库,同时筛检纳入文献的参考文献.收集氯吡格雷联用阿司匹林治疗ST-AMI的随机和半随机对照试验,两名评价员独立评价文献质量和提取资料,并采用RevMan 4.2软件对资料进行Meta分析. 结果共纳入10个研究,52 433例患者.Meta分析结果显示:(1)与单用阿司匹林比较,氯吡格雷与阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗能降低任何原因导致的死亡(RR=0.91,95% CI为0.85～0.97)、再发心肌梗死(RR=0.80,95%CI为0.72～0.89)、脑卒中(RR=0.81,95% CI为0.68～0.96)、心肌梗死后心绞痛(RR=0.35,95% CI为0.19～0.66)、冠状动脉内血栓(RR=0.73,95% CI为0.64～0.83)和降低死亡、再发心肌梗死或脑卒中的联合终点事件(RR=0.89,95% CI为0.84～0.95)的发生率;(2)改善心力衰竭和梗死相关动脉TIMI血流情况比较,差异无统计学意义(RR=0.97,95% CI为0.92～1.03;RR=1.14,95%CI为1.00～1.30;P＞0.05);(3)氯吡格雷与阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗与单用阿司匹林比较,并发症出血相似(RR=1.1l,95% CI为0.92～1.34). 结论 与单用阿司匹林比较,联用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林能降低ST-AMI患者的死亡(任何原因)、再发心肌梗死、脑卒中及梗死后心绞痛、冠状动脉内血栓和降低死亡、再发心肌梗死或脑卒中的联合终点事件的发生率,但在改善心力衰竭和梗死相关动脉TIMI血流方面两者疗效相当.短期氯吡格雷和阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗与单用阿司匹林发生出血并发症相似.     

One year outcomes with abciximab vs. placebo during percutaneous coronary intervention after pre-treatment with clopidogrel.

AIMS: In the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment Trial, the use of abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with 600 mg clopidogrel for >2 h was associated with no clinically measurable benefit at 30 days. We assessed whether there was any clinical benefit from abciximab at 1 year follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: After pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel, a total of 2159 patients undergoing PCI for stable or unstable angina without marked ST-segment shifts or positive biomarkers were randomly assigned to receive abciximab or placebo. The occurrence of the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization was assessed at 1 year after randomization. At 1 year, the composite endpoint occurred in 23.8% of the patients in each group [relative risk (RR), 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-1.20; P=0.92]. The combined incidence of death and myocardial infarction was 6.0% in the abciximab group and 6.4% in the placebo group (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.67-1.32; P=0.73). The mortality rate was 2.1% in the abciximab group and 2.4% in the placebo group (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.50-1.54; P=0.66). No trend towards clinical benefit was observed with abciximab at 1 year in any subgroup analysed. CONCLUSION: In patients with a low-to-intermediate risk profile undergoing PCI after pre-treatment with a 600 mg clopidogrel for at least 2 h, the use of abciximab offers no additional clinical benefit at 1 year.     

A Meta-Analysis of Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in the Context of Contemporary Preventive Strategies

BackgroundThe role of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases remains controversial, particularly in the context of contemporary aggressive preventive strategies.MethodsRelevant randomized clinical trials were included, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random-effects models. Additional moderator analyses were performed to compare the pooled treatment effects from recent trials (those reported after the guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program Third Adult Treatment Panel were published in 2001; thus, conducted on the background of contemporary preventive strategies) to the results of older trials.ResultsData from 14 randomized controlled trials involving 164,751 patients were included. Aspirin use decreased myocardial infarction risk by 16% compared with placebo (RR 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.94); however, in the moderator analyses, aspirin was not associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction in recent trials, but was in older trials (P-interaction = .02). Overall, aspirin use significantly increased the occurrence of major bleeding (RR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32-1.69) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54). In moderator analyses, the risk of major bleeding (P-interaction = .12) or hemorrhagic stroke (P-interaction = .44) with aspirin was not significantly different between the older and new trials. Differences between aspirin and placebo in the risks for all-cause stroke, cardiac death, and all-cause mortality were not found.ConclusionsIn the context of contemporary primary prevention guidelines, the effect of aspirin on myocardial infarction risk was significantly attenuated, whereas its major bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke complications were retained. Therefore, in contemporary practice, routine use of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events may have a net harmful effect.