A randomized, controlled parallel-group trial on efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (Venofer) vs iron gluconate (Ferrlecit) in haemodialysis patients treated with rHuEpo.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the present trial were to compare the efficacy and safety of two i.v. iron preparations with respect to haemoglobin levels, iron status and recombinant human erythropoetin (rHuEpo) dosage requirements in stable, rHuEpo-treated haemodialysis patients (maintenance phase of iron treatment) over 6 months. METHODS: A total of 59 patients were randomized and assigned to one of two treatment groups and 55 patients were analysed (iron sucrose n=27; iron gluconate n=28). Iron sucrose was administered in a dose of 250 mg iron diluted in 100 ml normal saline given over 60 min once per month, while 62.5 mg iron as iron gluconate was given once per week in a slow push injection (5 min). RESULTS: --Efficacy parameters: Haemoglobin levels could be maintained from baseline to endpoint in both groups. There were, however, more patients in the iron sucrose group than in the iron gluconate group for whom treatment was discontinued because their haemoglobin values exceeded 12.5 g/dl or ferritin values exceeded 1000 ng/ml (five vs two and three vs one patient, respectively). Transferrin saturation and serum ferritin increased significantly in both groups (+255.7 ng/ml with iron sucrose and +278.5 ng/ml with iron gluconate), while rHuEpo dosage did not change significantly throughout the study. --Safety parameters: There were a total of 174 infusions of iron sucrose and 720 injections of iron gluconate during the trial; all of them were well tolerated. In particular, we did not observe anaphylactoid reactions or any events suggestive of iron toxicity such as hypotension, dizziness, or nausea. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of iron sucrose (Venofer((R)) at a dose of 250 mg/month) was equally effective in maintaining haemoglobin and equally well tolerated as low doses of iron gluconate (Ferrlecit((R)) at a dose of 62.5 mg once per week) in stable, rHuEpo treated haemodialysis patients.     

Regular low-dose intravenous iron therapy improves response to erythropoietin in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND.: Erythropoietin (Epo) is an effective but expensive treatmentfor anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Hyporesponsivenessto Epo, particularly in haemodialysis patients, is most commonlydue to a functional iron deficiency, which is difficult to monitorreliably. METHODS.: Forty-six stable haemodialysis patients, receiving Epo therapy,were commenced on regular low-dose intravenous iron (sodiumferric gluconate complex) at a dose of 62.5 mg/5 ml given asa slow injection post-dialysis twice weekly, weekly, or fort-nightly,according to their serum ferritin levels. Haemoglobin, serumferritin, Epo dose, and iron dose were measured at 6-weeklyintervals over a 6-month period. RESULTS: At the beginning of the study, 12 patients in the group hadferritin levels of less than 100 µg/l, and were thus consideredto potentially have an absolute iron deficiency. The study groupwas therefore split into two subgroups for the purpose of analysis,i.e. the 12 patients with ferritin levels of less than 100 µg/lat the start of the study or ‘low ferritin group’,and the remaining 34 patients with ferritin levels of greaterthan 100 µg/l at the start of the study or ‘normalferritin group’. In the low ferritin group (n=12), intravenous iron therapy increasedserum ferritin levels, and produced a significant rise in haemoglobin,and a significant reduction in Epo dose. (Ferritin pre-iron,median (range) 68 (20–96)µg/l; post-iron, 210.5(91–447)µg/l, P<0.003, Wilcoxon. Haemoglobinpre-iron, 10.05 (8.2–11.9)g/dl; post-iron, 11.0 (9.9–11.9)g/dl,P<0.03. Epo dose pre-iron, 9000 (4000–30000) i.u./week;post-iron, 6000 (2000–10000)i.u./week, P<0.05.) Similar results were obtained in the normal ferritin group (n=34)following intravenous iron therapy, with significant increasesin serum ferntin levels and haemoglobin concentrations, anda significant reduction in Epo dose. (Ferritin pre-iron, 176(103–519) µg/l; post-iron, 304.5 (121–792)µg/l,P<0.0001. Haemoglobin pre-iron, 9.85 (6.5–12.8)g/dl;post-iron: 11.25 (9.9–13.3)g/dl, P<0.0001. Epo dosepre-iron, 6000 (2000–15 000)i.u./week; post-iron, 4000(0–15000)i.u./week, P<0.005.) CONCLUSION.: Regular intravenous iron supplementation in haemodialysis patientsimproves the response to Epo therapy.     

Crossover comparison of intravenous and subcutaneous erythropoietin in haemodialysis patients.

To examine the suggestion that s.c. administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) may be more effective than i.v. administration, we changed the route of administration in 11 patients, previously established on a stable dose of rHuEpo given twice or thrice weekly, from i.v. to s.c. administration without altering the dose. All patients were iron replete (serum ferritin greater than 100 micrograms/l). In one patient the haemoglobin concentration declined at the time of conversion due to poor compliance, and another patient died shortly after conversion. In the remainder there was a significant increase in haemoglobin concentration from 9.30 (SD 0.78) at the time of conversion to 9.84 (0.59) at 1 month, 10.35 (1.22) at 2 months, and 10.39 (1.42) at 3 months. The increase in haemoglobin concentration was greater than 1 g/dl at 3 months in only five of the patients. Serum ferritin prior to conversion was similar in 'responders' and 'non-responders', but all responders had a transferrin saturation of greater than 16%, whereas three of four non-responders had transferrin saturation of less than or equal to 16%. Subcutaneous administration of rHuEpo is more effective, dose for dose, than i.v. administration, but poor iron mobilization may limit the response.     

Weekly low-dose treatment with intravenous iron sucrose maintains iron status and decreases epoetin requirement in iron-replete haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis patients need sustained treatment with intravenous iron because iron deficiency limits the efficacy of recombinant human epoetin therapy in these patients. However, the optimal intravenous iron maintenance dose has not been established yet. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicentre clinical trial in iron-replete haemodialysis patients to evaluate the efficacy of weekly low-dose (50 mg) intravenous iron sucrose administration for 6 months to maintain the iron status, and to examine the effect on epoetin dosage needed to maintain stable haemoglobin values in these patients. Fifty patients were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, single arm, phase IV study. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (84%) completed the study. After 6 months of intravenous iron sucrose treatment, the mean ferritin value showed a tendency to increase slightly from 405 +/- 159 at baseline to 490 +/- 275 microg/l at the end of the study, but iron, transferrin levels and transferrin saturation did not change. The haemoglobin level remained stable (12 +/- 1.1 at baseline and 12.1 +/- 1.5 g/dl at the end of the study). The mean dose of darbepoetin alfa could be reduced from 0.75 to 0.46 microg/kg/week; epoetin alfa was decreased from 101 to 74 IU/kg/week; and the mean dose of epoetin beta could be reduced from 148 to 131 IU/kg/week at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A regular 50 mg weekly dosing schedule of iron sucrose maintains stable iron stores and haemoglobin levels in haemodialysed patients and allows considerable dose reductions for epoetins. Low-dose intravenous iron therapy may represent an optimal approach to treat the continuous loss of iron in dialysis patients.     

Efficacy of low‐dose i.v. iron therapy in haemodialysis patients

Aim: i.v. iron therapy is more effective in maintaining adequate iron status in haemodialysis (HD) patients than oral iron therapy (OIT). However, data on lower doses of i.v. iron therapy are insufficient. Methods: A non‐randomized, open‐label study was performed to compare the efficacy of low‐dose (≤50 mg/week of iron sucrose) i.v. iron therapy (LD‐IVIT) with OIT in HD patients with 100–800 µg/L serum ferritin levels over 4 months. Results: Eighty‐nine patients in the LD‐IVIT group (40 men, 49 women; aged 61 ± 13 years) and 30 patients in the oral iron therapy group (17 men, 13 women; aged 59 ± 7 years) were evaluated. After 4 months of each treatment, serum ferritin levels increased from 398 ± 137 to 529 ± 234 µg/L in the LD‐IVIT group (P < 0.01) but decreased from 351 ± 190 to 294 ± 175 µg/L in the OIT group (P < 0.01). In the LD‐IVIT group, transferrin saturation (from 28% ± 11% to 30% ± 14%, P = 0.49), weekly doses of recombinant human erythropoietin (from 5822 ± 2354 to 5636 ± 2306 IU/week, P = 0.48) and haemoglobin (from 101 ± 9 to 103 ± 9 g/L, P = 0.15) levels remained stable. Conclusion: LD‐IVIT may be one of the regimens that may be considered for maintaining iron status in HD patients. However, efficacy of LD‐IVIT should be verified by further randomized study.     

Experience of iron saccharate supplementation in haemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin

SUMMARY: We assessed the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) iron saccharate (VENOFER) vs oral iron supplementation in haemodialysis patients treated with low-dose erythropoietin (EPO). Twenty haemodialysis patients with serum ferritin >200 ng/mL and transferrin saturation >30% were assigned to one of the two groups. In Group 1, 10 were given i.v. iron saccharate (100 mg i.v. twice weekly) post dialysis. In Group 2, oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg was given thrice daily. In both groups, subcutaneous EPO 25 units/kg body weight (BW) was started simultaneously, twice weekly. After 3 months (study completion) the mean haemoglobin and haematocrit was significantly increased in Group 1 than in Group 2 (Hb 11.60 ± 0.64 G/ dL vs 10.5 G/dL ± 1.14 P <0.01). the final mean EPO dose was 25% lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (3400 ± 1356 U/week vs 4600 ± 1356 U/week P =0.10) and the mean serum ferritin was higher in the i.v. iron group than the oral group (671 ng/mL ± 388 vs 367 ng/mL ± 238 P =NS). the same was also observed with transferrin saturation (44.6%± 19.8 in Group 1 vs. 29%± 11.0 in Group 2 P =NS). No adverse effects were seen during the study. In conclusion, we observed that regular use of i.v. iron had a significantly enhanced haemoglobin response, better maintained serum ferritin and lower EPO dosage requirement than the oral iron group.     

Experience of iron saccharate supplementation in haemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin

We assessed the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) iron saccharate (VENOFER) vs oral iron supplementation in haemodialysis patients treated with low-dose erythropoietin (EPO). Twenty haemodialysis patients with serum ferritin >200 ng/mL and transferrin saturation >30% were assigned to one of the two groups. In Group 1, 10 were given i.v. iron saccharate (100 mg i.v. twice weekly) post dialysis. In Group 2, oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg was given thrice daily. In both groups, subcutaneous EPO 25 units/kg body weight (BW) was started simultaneously, twice weekly. After 3 months (study completion) the mean haemoglobin and haematocrit was significantly increased in Group 1 than in Group 2 (Hb 11.60±0.64 G/dL vs 10.5 G/dL±1.14 P <0.01). The final mean EPO dose was 25% lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (3400±1356 U/week vs 4600±1356 U/week P =0.10) and the mean serum ferritin was higher in the i.v. iron group than the oral group (671 ng/mL±388 vs 367 ng/mL±238 P =NS). The same was also observed with transferrin saturation (44.6%±19.8 in Group 1 vs. 29%±11.0 in Group 2 P =NS). No adverse effects were seen during the study. In conclusion, we observed that regular use of i.v. iron had a significantly enhanced haemoglobin response, better maintained serum ferritin and lower EPO dosage requirement than the oral iron group.     

Economic appraisal of maintenance parenteral iron administration in treatment of anaemia in chronic haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND.: Iron deficiency is common in haemodialysis patients and adequatesupplementation by the oral or parenteral route has been limitedby drug side-effects, absorption, and cost. Intermittent doses of intravenous iron dextran complex are recommendedin patients with inadequate iron stores despite maximal toleratedoral dose. We conducted a prospective study with economic analysisof a regular maintenance intravenous iron regimen in this groupof patients. METHODS.: Fifty patients comprising one-half of our haemodialysis populationrequired intravenous iron treatment, i.e. they failed to achievean arbitrary goal serum ferritin 100 µg/l despite maximaltolerated oral iron dose. After a loading dose of intravenousiron dextran complex (IV-FeD) based on Van Wyck's nomogram (400±300mg) they received a maintenance dose of 100 mg IV-FeD once every2 weeks. Initial goal serum ferritin was set at 100–200µg/l. If no increase in haemoglobin was achieved at thislevel, transferrin saturation was measured to assess bioavailableiron, and when less than 20%, goal serum ferritin was increasedto 200–300 µg/l. Recombinant human erythropoietin(rHuEpo) was used where needed to maintain haemoglobin in the9.5–10.5 g/l range only if ferritin requirements weremet. RESULTS.: Mean haemoglobin rose from 87.7±12.1 to 100.3±13.1g/l (P<0.001, Cl 7.7–17.9) at mean follow-up of 6 months(range 3–15 months). In patients on rHuEpo, dose per patientwas reduced from 96±59 u/kg per week to 63±41u/kg per week, repres enting a 35% dose reduction (P<0.05,Cl 1–65). An annual cost reduction of $3166 CDN was projected;however, in the first year this is offset by the cost of theloading dose of IV-FeD required at the beginning of treatment.No adverse reactions were encountered. CONCLUSIONS.: Iron deficiency is very common in our haemodialysis population,especially in those patients receiving rHuEpo. A carefully monitoredregimen of maintenance parenteral iron is a safe, effective,and economically favourable means of iron supplementation inpatients with insufficient iron stores on maximum toleratedoral supplements.     

Importance of iron supply for erythropoietin therapy

BACKGROUND.: rHuEpo and iron therapy corrects renal anaemia. However, dosage,route of administration, and monitoring of iron and rHuEpo therapyin uraemic patients remains controversial. METHODS.: Therefore a 22-month i.v. iron substitution trial, subdividedinto four study periods, was initiated in 64 iron-depleted chronichaemodialysis (HD) patients receiving i.v. rHuEpo therapy. Withinthe first period (6 months) patients were treated with high-doseiron (100mg at the end of HD treatment, mean cumulative i.v.iron saccharate dosage was 2538±810 mg per patient) inorder to replete the iron stores. During the 2nd period (6 months)the available iron pool was maintained with low-dose iron byadministration of 10, 20, or 40 mg iron at each HD, dependingon haemoglobin, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation levels.During the 3rd period (4 months), the iron-replete patientswere randomized to i.v. or s.c. route of rHuEpo administration.During the 4th period (3 months) iron substitution was omittedto exclude severe iron overload. RESULTS.: In the first study period, high-dose iron therapy dramaticallyreduced the weekly rHuEpo requirement by 70% of the initialdose (from 217±179 to 62.6±70.2 U/kg/week). Inthe 2nd period iron storage pools were easily maintained. Serumferritin and transferrin saturation levels remained stable duringthis study period. Randomization for thrice-weekly i.v. or s.c.administration of rHuEpo in the 3rd study period revealed comparableefficacy for both administration routes in iron-replete patients.In well-nourished patients (serum albumin >40 g/1) withouthyperparathyroidism (parathyroid hormone levels < 100 pg/ml),50–60 U/kg/week rHuEpo were required in contrast to >100 U/kg/week in patients with hyperparathyroidism. In the 4thstudy period, withdrawal of iron administration led to a rapiddecrease of serum ferritin and transferrin saturation levels,indicating the absence of severe iron overload. CONCLUSIONS.: Long-term thrice-weekly i.v. low-dose iron therapy (10–20mg per HD treatment) proved to be a very effective, economicaland safe treatment schedule for iron-replete HD patients. Intravenousand s.c. rHuEpo therapy was equally efficacious in iron-replete,well-nourished patients. HD patients with increased parathyroidhormone levels require significantly more rHuEpo than HD patientswith parathyroid hormone levels values <100 pg/ml).     

Enhanced oxidative stress in haemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron therapy.

BACKGROUND: Iron balance is critical for adequate erythropoiesis and there remains much debate concerning the optimal timing and dosage of iron therapy for haemodialysis patients receiving recombinant human erythropoietin therapy. METHODS: In this study, we examined the influence of baseline ferritin level and intravenous infusion of 100 mg ferric saccharate on the oxidative status of the patients on maintenance haemodialysis. The levels of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxides were determined in erythrocytes and plasma of 50 uraemic patients on haemodialysis. These patients were divided into groups 1, 2, and 3, based on their baseline serum ferritin levels of <300, 301-600, and >601 microg/l, respectively. RESULTS: We found that the mean superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in the erythrocytes were similar in the three groups of patients and did not differ from those of the age-matched controls. On the other hand, all the haemodialysis patients showed significantly higher plasma SOD activity as compared to controls. After intravenous iron infusion, group 3 patients showed the largest decrease in plasma SOD activity. The plasma glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) activities of the patients in all three groups and the erythrocyte GSHPx activities of the patients in the groups 2 and 3 were lower than those of the healthy controls. In all three groups of patients, no difference in GSHPx activity was found before and after intravenous iron infusion. On the other hand, we found that the average baseline levels of plasma lipid peroxides of all three groups of patients were significantly higher than that of the controls. The patients in group 3 with the highest serum ferritin levels showed the highest levels of plasma lipid peroxides. More importantly, we found that after iron infusion, the patients in all three groups, particularly those in group 3, showed significantly elevated levels of plasma lipid peroxides. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that increased oxidative stress in the blood circulation of the uraemic patients on haemodialysis is exacerbated by the elevated baseline serum ferritin levels and intravenous iron infusion. The resultant oxidative damage may contribute to the increased incidence of atherosclerosis in the patients with end-stage renal disease on long-term haemodialysis.     

Long-term effects on quality of life in haemodialysis patients of correction of anaemia with erythropoietin

Quality of life assessments were performed in 24 haemodialysispatients (10 males, 14 females, age 45 ±15 years) undergoingrHuEpo treatment. The results in the rHuEpo-treated patientswere compared with those in eight haemodialysis patients noton rHuEpo and with the results of a nationwide study of dialysispatients in Sweden (carried out before rHuEpo was registered).Survey questionnaires (112 items, divided into three dimensions,i.e. physical, social, and emotional wellbeing) were completedbefore treatment (Hb 73± 1.1 g/1), when the target Hbvalue of 10 g/dl was reached (1–7 months) and in 14 patients1 year after correction of the anaemia. Before treatment, therHuEpo group had significantly more complaints about poor appetite,fatigue, and irritability than the controls. After the anaemiawas corrected, the rHuEpo group had significantly improved physicaland emotional wellbeing. The most significant changes occurredin satisfaction with health, physical activities of daily life,and fatigue. Alterations in emotional symptoms, such as depressionand apathy, were less pronounced. Only minor changes were observedin their social wellbeing. One year after correction of theanaemia, the improvements in physical and emotional wellbeingwere still present in the rHuEpo-treated patients. A positiveeffect was also noted on hospitalization rate. Scores for thesubdimensions of satisfaction with health, sexual adjustment,physical symptoms, and emotional wellbeing improved in the rHuEpo-treatedgroup and reached a level that was the same, or even higher,than the scores in the dialysis patients in the nationwide study.In conclusion, the quality of life improved during rHuEpo treatment.The greatest changes were seen in satisfaction with health,physical activity, and emotional wellbeing. The positive effectsobserved after the correction of anaemia persisted after morethan a year on rHuEpo treatment.     

Increased red cell 2,3-diphosphoglycerate levels in haemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin

The efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) forthe treatment of renal anaemia is well established. To assessthe effect of rHuEpo treatment on physical performance we evaluatedphysical working capacity, oxygen uptake and red cell 2,3diphosphoglycerate(DPG) values at rest and during and after exercise on a bicyclespiroergometer in eight chronically haemodialysed patients.Follow-up examination was carried out after a mean of 14 weeks(range 9–19 weeks), when mean haemoglobin had increasedfrom 7.8 to a stable value of 13.0 g/dl in response to rHuEpotreatment (P<0.001). Physical working capacity and oxygenuptake at the anaerobic threshold (4 rnrnol/l blood lactateconcentration) increased from 68±12 to 80±16 wattsand 0.95±0.14 to 1.10±0.20 l/min, respectively(P<0.01). DPG, which determines oxygen affinity to haemoglobinin red cells, increased by 13% from 13.7±1.5 to 15.5±2.2pmol/g Hb (P<0.05 ). With maximal exercise mean DPG valuessignificantly decreased to a much lower level without rHuEpotreatment than after correction of anaemia. Therefore rHuEpotreatment results both in better oxygen transport capacity andreduced intraerythrocytic oxygen affinity, which is followedby improved oxygen delivery to tissues per unit of haemoglobin.These effects may explain the improvement of exercise capacityobserved in dialysis patients after rHuEpo treatment.     

Does erythropoietin cause hormonal changes in haemodialysis patients?

In 10 female and 10 male haemodialysis patients plasma FSH,LH, testosterone, prolactin, and somatotropin (STH) were estimatedduring erythropoietin (rHuEpo) treatment for 6 months. All butone patient responded with an increase in haemoglobin. The patientsexperienced improved sexual function according to the answersgiven in a self-administered questionnaire. Of the 90% who answeredbefore the study 22% could not perform sexual activities whetherthey wanted to or not. During and at the end of the study 80and 60% respectively answered, and none had these problems.In contrast, serum values of the sexual hormones (FSH, LH, testosteroneand prolactin) were not significantly changed during rHuEpotherapy, and neither was the basal plasma STH.     

Blood 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine is associated with erythropoietin resistance in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: 8-Hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a product of oxidized DNA, is increased in haemodialysis (HD) patients, but the clinical relevance of enhanced 8-OHdG production in these patients remains unknown. METHODS: We cross-sectionally measured serum 8-OHdG in 73 patients on maintenance HD (age 68+/-2 years, time on HD 85+/-11 months, male/female=42/31), and examined the relationship between blood 8-OHdG and the severity of renal anaemia and the weekly dosage of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in serum 8-OHdG in HD patients compared with normal subjects. Serum 8-OHdG was positively correlated with the patients' age (r=0.231, P<0.05) but not with the duration of HD. Serum 8-OHdG was significantly higher in diabetic subjects than in non-diabetic subjects (P<0.05). Serum 8-OHdG had a significant inverse correlation with haemoglobin (Hb) (r=-0.526, P<0.01) but a positive correlation with the rHuEPO dose (r=0.443, P<0.01) and the ratio of the weekly rHuEPO dose divided by Hb (r=0.487, P<0.01). Serum 8-OHdG was not correlated with inflammatory and nutritional parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the elevation of circulating 8-OHdG may be associated, at least in part, with rHuEPO resistance in HD patients.     

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients on chronic haemodialysis therapy

BACKGROUND.: Malnutrition is frequently encountered in patients on regularhaemodialysis therapy and presents an important determinantof morbidity and mortality. Usual therapeutic approaches toalleviate malnutrition have been unsuccessful. The objectiveof this study was to assess the impact of intradialytic parenteralnutrition (IDPN) with amino acids (in combination with a glucose-containingdialysate) on nutritional parameters and immunocompetence inpatients on regular haemodialysis treatment. METHODS.: Effects of IDPN were evaluated in 16 malnourished patients.After a run-in period of 4 weeks (to define stable baselineconditions) 0.8 g amino acids/kg bodyweight using a novel amino-acidsolution (adapted to metabolic alteration of uraemia and includingthe dipeptide glycyl-tyrosine as tyrosine source) was infusedthrice weekly during each haemodialysis session for 16 weeks. RESULTS.: Intradialytic amino-acid infusion was well tolerated and thedipeptide was rapidly utilized with only traces being detectablein plasma after dialysis. Visceral protein synthesis was improved,serum albumin, prealbumin, and cholinesterase increased duringIDPN (P < 0.05). As indicators of augmented immunocompetenceskin test reactivity against multiple antigens was improved(P < 0.02) and total lymphocyte count was raised (P <0.05). Plasma amino acid pattern did not deteriorate but failedto normalize during IDPN and phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio remainedstable. Anthropometric measurements and eating behaviour asassessed by dietary records were not altered during IDPN. CONCLUSIONS.: Even using a simple and limited intradialytic nutritional supportwith amino acids can improve visceral protein status and stimulateimmunocompetence in malnourished patients on regular haemodialysistherapy.     

Efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous ascorbic acid for anaemia in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (i.v.) ascorbic acid (AA) improves anaemia in iron-overloaded, erythropoietin (rEPO) hyporesponsive haemodialysis patients. While oral AA is readily attainable, the efficacy and safety of oral versus i.v. AA has not been examined. METHODS: We conducted an open-label randomised parallel study on the effects of 8 weeks of 250 mg oral AA (n=10) compared with 250 mg i.v. AA (n=11) 3x/week on haemoglobin (Hb), ferritin and rEPO dose in 21 iron-overloaded haemodialysis patients. We also examined the effect of 3 months of 500 mg oral AA 3x/week (n=70) compared with no treatment (n=83) on Hb, ferritin and rEPO dose in 153 haemodialysis patients. RESULTS: Patients had severe AA deficiency (mean 2.2+/-SE 0.4 mg/L; normal range, 4.0-14.0). Following treatment, the plasma AA level increased (P<0.001), but was not significantly different between the groups. There was no change in Hb, iron availability and rEPO dose with oral or i.v. AA. There was a significant increase in serum oxalate but no significant changes in left ventricular function or renal calculi formation. In the second study, oral AA had no effect on Hb, rEPO dose and ferritin in the whole group and a subgroup of 30 with anaemia. CONCLUSION: Haemoglobin and iron availability did not improve following oral or i.v. AA in this select small group of iron-overloaded haemodialysis patients or in a larger population of haemodialysis patients given oral AA at a higher dose and for a longer duration. AA supplementation may still be warranted in view of severe AA deficiency in haemodialysis patients.     

Long-term therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin increases CD8+ T-cell apoptosis in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: We intended to assess the intensity of apoptosis in the CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes of haemodialysis (HD) patients on recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo). METHODS: The expression of Fas, tumour necrosis factor-alpha receptors (TNFRI and TNFRII) and the CD28 molecule on lymphocytes was evaluated in 15 HD patients before and during treatment with rHuEpo. In cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stimulated with rHuEpo, phytohaemagglutinin and camptothecin, our measures of apoptosis were the percentages of cells with subdiploid DNA content and of annexin V-stained cells. Results, Therapy with rHuEpo did not affect CD4+ T cells but decreased the percentage of CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood. The intensity of apoptosis in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells at baseline was lower in HD patients than in healthy volunteers, and increased in those treated with rHuEpo. In vitro, rHuEpo did not induce apoptosis in PBMCs. The percentage of CD8+Fas+ T cells was constant, while that of CD8+TNFRI+ cells declined during follow-up. There was an increase in the percentage of CD28+ T cells, mainly in the CD8+ compartment, as early as 1 month after the introduction of rHuEpo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rHupo caused a decline of CD8+ T cells in HD patients, which most probably was mediated via the TNFRI-related apoptotic pathway and was independent of Fas expression. Apoptosis in vitro was not directly influenced by rHuEpo, suggesting that the process in vivo was only initiated by rHuEpo supplementation.     

Safety of intravenous injection of iron saccharate in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND.: The most frequent i.v. iron preparations used for haemodialysispatients are iron dextran, iron gluconate and iron saccharate.Possible side effects include anaphylactic reactions due topreformed antibodies to dextran or vascular reactions due tounbound iron during treatment with iron gluconate or iron saccharate. METHODS.: Four dosage regimens of i.v. iron saccharate therapy were studied:10, 20, 40 and 100 mg, which were given over a time period of1 min after the end of the dialysis session. Iron metabolismparameters (serum iron concentration, transferrin saturationand serum ferritin levels) were measured at 0, 1, 5, 15 and30 min after application and immediately prior to the next dialysissession. All 18 regular haemodialysis patients studied receivedrecombinant human erythro-poietin (rHuEpo). RESULTS.: Serum iron levels and transferrin saturation increased significantlyfollowing i.v. injection of all doses of iron saccharate. Iron‘oversaturation’ of transferrin iron binding didnot occur in patients with transferrin levels >180 mg/dl.However, in patients with transferrin levels <180 mg/dl theinjection of 100 mg iron saccharate resulted in a transferrinsaturation of 102.6±39.5% (two patients with transferrinlevels of 87 and 92 mg/dl had transferrin saturations of 119.8and 149.7%, two patients with transferrin levels of 148 and171 mg/dl had transferrin saturations of 77.9 and 63.1%, respectively).Serum ferritin levels remained unchanged during the post-injectionperiod and increased by the next dialysis session followinginjection of 100 mg iron saccharate by 165%. CONCLUSIONS.: It is concluded that intravenous iron saccharate injection (10–100mgeven within 1 min) does not result in ‘oversaturation’of transferrin iron binding if serum transferrin levels are>180mg/dl (high-risk patients: transferrin <100 mg/dl). Thismay explain, at least in part, the minimal side effects observedduring the i.v. application of iron saccharate. Low-dose i.v.iron saccharate (10–40 mg) is recommended for iron supplementationof haemodialysis patients. If injection of 100 mg is necessary,serum transferrin level should exceed 180 mg/dl. There is, however,no need for fast i.v. injection during routine iron supplementation.     

The impact of withdrawing ACE inhibitors on erythropoietin responsiveness and left ventricular hypertrophy in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have the capability of decreasing left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. On the other hand, recent reports provide conflicting information regarding the impact of ACE inhibitors on responsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo), and there are no data about the effect of withdrawing ACE inhibitors both on rHuEpo response and LVMI in HD patients. METHODS: ACE inhibitors were switched to another antihypertensive medication in 23 out of 68 patients in our HD unit who were receiving both rHuEpo and an ACE inhibitor for more than 1 year. Blood pressure at the pre- and post-dialysis phases, haematocrit levels and rHuEpo doses were determined at the end of the first and of the third years, and the LVMI was determined at the end of the third year. Statistical analyses were done in 15 patients in whom the study could be completed. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) haematocrit level was increased from 26.3+6.4% to 29.8+/-6.3% at the first year (P<0.05), and to 29.4+/-6.5% at the third year (P<0.05 vs before), while the mean dose of rHuEpo was decreased from 208.3+/-99.0 UI/kg/week to 141.0+/-91.8 at the first year (P=0.01), and to 141.4+/-81.0 at the third year (P=0.01 vs before). Administration of rHuEpo had been stopped in two patients at the end of the first year. The mean blood pressure level and the mean LVMI were not changed (P>0.05 vs before). There were no significant changes in dialysis parameters, iron status, plasma renin activities, and levels of aldosterone, intact parathyroid hormone, aluminum and erythropoietin. CONCLUSION: The findings of this small uncontrolled study indicate that withdrawal of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive chronic HD patients receiving rHuEpo may result in an increase in haematocrit level, and a decrease in dose of rHuEpo without any significant changes in the blood pressure level and LVMI. Controlled prospective studies are needed to clarify this issue.