Contribution of T-cell receptor-contacting and peptide-binding residues of the class II molecule HLA-DR4 Dw10 to serologic and antigen-specific T-cell recognition.

The relative contributions of putative T-cell receptor (TCR)-contacting and peptide-binding residues of a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II restriction element to serologic and antigen-specific T-cell recognition were investigated by site-specific mutagenesis. Amino acids 70 and 71 in the DR beta 1 domain of DR4 Dw10 are uniquely differnet from the other Dw subtypes of DR4. Residue 70 is predicted to be located at the membrane-distal surface of the class II molecule, where it may influence T-cell recognition by a direct interaction with a TCR. Residue 71 is predicted to form part of the antigen-binding groove where its influence on T-cell recognition may be mediated indirectly via an effect on peptide binding. Transfected murine L cells were produced expressing the products of DR4 Dw10B genes in which the codons for residues 70 and 71 had been mutated towards DR4 Dw14. Support for the predicted orientations of beta-chain residues 70 and 71 was lent by the observation that only residue 70 plays an important role in the formation of a serologic determinant. Mutation of this residue was sufficient to produce recovery of recognition by a human monoclonal antibody, NI, which has specificity for all the DR4 subtypes with the exception of DR4 Dw10. The human T-cell clone HA1.7, specific for influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) peptide 307-319 and restricted by DR1 Dw1, exhibits degeneracy of MHC restriction on the DR4 Dw subtypes with the exception of DR4 Dw10.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Molecular mimicry by major histocompatibility complex molecules and peptides accounts for some alloresponses.

One explanation offered for the uniquely high precursor frequencies of T cells which recognize allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, and their lack of self-MHC restriction, is that the alloreactive cells are polyclonal populations the primary specificity of which is self-MHC plus peptide X1, X2, ... Xn. These are postulated to cross-react with allo-MHC plus peptides Y1, Y2, ... Yn. It has been further suggested that the structural basis for the crossreactivity between different MHC alleles is the similarity in amino acid sequence of that part of the molecule predicted to make contact with the T cell receptor (TcR). In order to test this concept, T cells were obtained with dual specificity for influenza haemagglutinin (HA), restricted by HLA-DR1Dw1, and for DR4Dw4/Dw14 expressed on allogeneic human B cell lines, and the specificity of one clone was studied in detail. The exposed, TcR-contacting surfaces of these two DR molecules are predicted to be identical. Although the HA-specific response was stimulated by DR1-expressing mouse DAP.3 transfectants, DAP.3 cells expressing the alloantigen DR4Dw4 were unable to stimulate, possibly because of a failure to present the necessary human peptide for anti-DR4 allorecognition. Therefore, the effects of pulsing the DR4Dw4-expressing DAP.3 cells with the HA peptide were examined. This peptide is known to bind to both DR1 and DR4. Addition of the HA peptide restored the anti-DR4Dw4 response. These data support the concept that allorecognition in some responder/stimulator combinations can be explained by cross-reactivity at the level of the MHC molecule and the peptide.     

T-cell receptor V beta selectivity in T-cell clones alloreactive to HLA-Dw14.

The HLA-DR4 subtypes Dw14 and Dw4 are T-cell-defined allospecificities encoded by the DRB1*0404 and DRB1*0401 genes, respectively. Although these allelic subtypes differ in only two amino acids, allorecognition between Dw14 and Dw4-positive individuals is brisk. This provides an opportunity to analyze T-cell receptor (TCR) usage in a very limited and specifically targeted case, namely the Dw4 anti-Dw14 allogeneic T-cell response. The variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) region sequences of the TCR beta chain from two different Dw14-specific alloreactive T-cell clones derived from a Dw4 donor were examined. Clone EMO25 recognized the Dw14.1, Dw14.2, and Dw15 subtypes, which share a DRB1 polymorphism at codon 71 on a DR4 background, while clone EMO36 reacted with only the Dw14.1 subtype associated with polymorphisms at codons 71 and 86. TCR beta cDNA from each clone was amplified using an anchored polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subsequently expanded with V beta- and C beta-specific primers for asymmetric PCR and direct DNA sequencing. Both clones were found to express the same TCR V beta 8.2 gene segment; however, they have several different residues within the V beta-D beta-J beta junctional regions. V beta 8 usage was also enriched in polyclonal cells obtained from mixed lymphocyte cultures performed between the Dw4 and Dw14 responder-stimulator combination from which EMO25 and EMO36 were derived.     

The majority of HLA-DR3 alloreactive T cells is peptide specific, but does not recognize known DR3-bound sequences

Abstract: Rejection of transplants is frequently caused by activation of alloreactive T cells that recognize HLA/peptide differences between patient and graft. This T-cell response can be directed towards the HLA molecule, the HLA-bound peptide or towards a combination. More insight in the involvement of peptides in this process may help to find ways to avoid rejection using for example antagonist peptides. In recent years many naturally processed HLA-bound peptides have been identified. This raises the question of whether these, presumably abundant, peptides are involved in class ri-specific allorecognition. To investigate this, we first determined the proportion of peptide-specific alloreactive T cells in the alloresponse against HLA-DR3. For this purpose we have tested a panel of DR3-specific alloreactive T-cell clones against a DM-mutant (i.e. peptide loading deficient) cell line. We found that 59 out of 64 alloreactive T-cell clones were dependent upon the presence of DM for an optimal response. However, only 2 DM-dependent T-cell clones recognize known peptide sequences. Thus we conclude that most DR3-specific alloreactive T-cell clones are peptide specific and that the currently known DR3-bound peptides are not the main target for allorecognitioa Finally, we identified 4 T-cell clones that recognized the DM-mutant better than the wild-type cell line. The response against the wild-type cell line could not be restored with invariant chain derived peptides (CLIP). This provides additional evidence that DM can negatively select self-peptides other than CLIP, which can result in selection against peptides involved in allorecognition.     

Involvement of class II beta-chain amino acid residues 85 and 86 in T-cell allorecognition.

Alloreactive T-cell clones were derived by limiting dilution following priming to allogeneic cells bearing HLA-DR1 alloantigens. Clonal specificities were determined by extensive testing on a panel of allogeneic lymphoblastoid cell lines and by blocking studies with monoclonal antibodies specific for HLA-DR, -DQ, and -DP class II molecules. Out of nine DR1-positive cell lines, three failed to stimulate a subset of the T-cell clones in conventional proliferation assays. Proliferation by all of the clones was blocked by anti-DR antibodies, not by anti-DQ or anti-DP, which was consistent with the conclusion that the HLA-DR molecule was recognized. This DR1-associated polymorphism has been identified as Dw20 by the Tenth International Histocompatibility Workshop. The molecular basis for this altered recognition of the DR1 molecule was determined by allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization and by DNA sequencing studies. The first, second, and third hypervariable regions of all nine DR1-positive cell lines were identical. Valine and glycine were found at positions 85 and 86 of the DR1 beta 1 chain in DR1 molecules from six of the nine lymphoblastoid cell lines, whereas alanine and valine were found in the three variant (Dw20) DR1-positive cells. By analogy with class I structure, residues 85 and 86 would be located at the extreme C-terminal end of the beta-chain alpha helix. Together or separately, these amino acid differences may define a T-cell recognition element on the DR1 molecule serving to contact allospecific T-cell receptors. Alternatively, if allorecognition involves recognition of a self peptide complexed with an allogeneic MHC molecule, then it is possible that the differences T cells recognize on DR1 class II proteins arise from peptide-specific interactions with residues 85 and 86.     

Shared molecular markers of genetic predisposition to seropositive rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with the human class II major histocompatibility complex antigens known as HLA-DR4. HLA-DR4 can be subdivided by cellular typing into five subtypes: Dw4, Dw10, Dw13, Dw14, and Dw15. By traditional serologic methods, 60-80% of rheumatoid arthritis patients type HLA-DR4 compared to approximately 20% of the general population. It has been demonstrated, using a panel of four alloreactive T-cell clones, each of which recognized HLA-DR4, Dw14 homozygous typing cells, that cells from all of a group of 23 rheumatoid arthritis patients could be recognized by one or more of these clones regardless of the patients' serologic typing. As the expressed polymorphism of the DR molecule is accounted for by the beta 1 gene, this gene was amplified, using the polymerase chain reaction, and sequenced. Seven patients whose cells were recognized by one of the DR4, DW14-specific T-cell clones, T431, were analyzed. All of these patients shared a common sequence in the third hypervariable region of the DR beta 1 chain gene. The sequence identified is the one normally associated with DR4, Dw14 and DR1. Patients and DR4-positive controls whose cells did not stimulate this clone did not share this sequence. These results suggest that this hypervariable region might be an important contribution to a restriction site for the putative causative agent(s) in rheumatoid arthritis.     

Reversal of HLA restriction by a point mutation in an antigenic peptide

The HLA restriction of a human T cell clone specific for residues 307-319 of influenza haemagglutinin was changed by the introduction of a point substitution in the peptide. Cells expressing HLA Dw1, DR4 Dw4, Dw13, Dw14, or Dw15 could present the natural haemagglutinin peptide to varying extents to the clone, but DR4 Dw10 could not. Replacement of glutamine-312 of the peptide with arginine produced an analogue that was recognized by the T cell clone only in the context of DR4 Dw10; neither DR1 nor any of the other DR4 alleles could present this peptide to the clone. The inability to bind either the natural or modified peptide was shown not to be the cause of the non-responsiveness. Rather, the differential stimulation of the clone appeared to arise from sequence variations between the DR alleles in residues comprising the beta-chain helix, which either affected recognition by directly contacting the T cell receptor or modified the conformation of the bound peptide. The latter effects were sufficiently subtle to modulate recognition by changing the fine details of the bound peptide but not to eliminate the capacity of the restriction element to bind the peptide.     

The relationship between MHC restricted and allospecific T cell recognition

The existence in the mature T cell repertoire of a high precursor frequency of cells which recognise allogeneic MHC molecules appears to contradict the well-established dogma of positive selection for self MHC restriction. In order to explore the possibility that alloreactive cells are derived from a fraction of the repertoire that is not self-MHC-restricted, the contribution of in vivo-primed T cells to "primary" alloresponses was investigated. Peripheral blood T cells were separated into virgin and memory populations by sorting for low and high levels of LFA-3 expression, and their proliferative responses to MHC incompatible stimulator cells was quantitated. The results demonstrated that approximately half of a "primary" alloresponse is contributed by previously primed T cells that, by definition, must be self-MHC restricted. Furthermore it was possible to define the original MHC-restricted antigen specificity of two T cell clones raised against the allospecific HLA-DR1 from a DR4Dw4/DRw13DW19 responder. The emerging consensus view that anti-MHC alloreactive T cells, like antigen-specific T cells, are specific for MHC/peptide complexes, and have a parental self-MHC restriction, begs a structural explanation. Comparison of multiple DR beta 1 domain sequences reveals that DR molecules fall into groups that have extensive homology in the residues on the beta 1 domain alpha-helix that are predicted to point up towards the T cell receptor (histotopic), and thus to determine MHC restriction. Given that the DR alpha chain is invariant this creates the possibility that anti-DR allorecognition can mimic self-restricted recognition. Within these groups of histotopically similar DR products there are multiple differences in the peptide-binding residues that lie on the inner aspects of the alpha-helix or on the floor of the antigen-binding groove. As a consequence, it is predicted that a different array of endogenous peptides will be bound, due to determinant selection. Thus, allorecognition within these groups may result from the recognition of endogenous peptides that are bound by stimulator but not by responder MHC products, seen in a self-restricted manner. In combinations where histotopic similarity does not exist, allorecognition may be best explained by the chance occurrence of a receptor selected for intermediate affinity for thymically expressed MHC molecules having a higher affinity for an allogeneic histotope. Such a receptor would have been deleted in a thymus expressing the allospecificity, but would be perceived as "safe" in the absence of this MHC product.     

Position 71 in the α helix of the DRβ domain is predicted to influence peptide binding and plays a central role in allorecognition

Despite all the structural and functional data that have been accumulated regarding major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules during recent years, the relative contribution of putative T cell receptor (TcR)-contacting residues and peptide-binding MHC polymorphisms to MHC-restricted and allospecific T cell responses remains a point of contention. Some authors emphasize the importance of direct interaction between the allospecific TcR and polymorphic MHC residues whereas other emphasize the role of naturally processed MHC-bound peptides. We have previously described a new HLA-DRB1 allele: DR BON (DRB1*0103). This gene differs from DRB1*0101 by six base pairs clustered in the third variable region of the second exon leading to three amino acid changes at positions 67, 70 and 71 of the β chain of the HLA-DR molecule. To define the respective role of these residues in allorecognition, we have performed site-directed mutagenesis on the DRB1*0103 allele to create six mutants which are intermediary between the DR BON and the DR1 alleles. These mutant cDNA were expressed in mouse fibroblasts and the transfectants with the highest expression of class II molecules were used as stimulators for a panel of ten anti-DR BON and five anti-DR1 alloreactive T cell clones. We demonstrate that the residue at the peptide-binding position 71 is of paramount importance in the alloresponse of these clones. In addition some clones were sensitive to amino acid substitution at the TcR-contacting position 70, while substitution at position 67 affects very few clones. The dominance of residue 71 was also observed with an influenza hemagglutinin-specific HLA-DR BON-restricted T cell line.     

HLA-Dw14 and HLA-DR3 haplotypes share a functional determinant recognized by a human alloreactive T-cell clone

In the process of studying the fine specificity of HLA class II molecules, we identified an alloreactive T-cell clone raised to a HLA-Dw14 homozygous cell line that was specifically stimulated by Dw14+ homozygous typing cells but negatively with cells expressing the HLA-Dw4,-Dw10, -Dw13, and -Dw15 subspecificities of DR4. Of interest, this clone was also equivalently activated by stimulation with all DR3 cells and cell lines tested. Negative responses were obtained using a panel of 87 non-DR3 and non-Dw14 cells, including cell lines of the Tenth Histocompatibility Workshop. A monoclonal antibody inhibition study revealed the relevant stimulating determinant to be on HLA-DR molecules in both Dw14- and DR3-positive cells. A comparison of the DR beta 1-chain-inferred amino acid sequences suggests that formation of a topologically equivalent stimulating determinant would involve the participation of two noncontiguous regions of the third diversity region of DR beta 1. The putative recognition conformation detected by the clone is most probably specified by the presence of a valine at position 86 and a nonnegatively charged residue at positions 70, 71, and 74, since these are the only residues where DR3 and Dw14 are distinguishable from all other HLA-DR types. These findings illustrate that the functional ability of class II molecules is not necessarily either illustrated or predicted by serologic typing or by simple considerations of amino acid sequence.     

T-cell clones identify three distinct epitopes associated with HLA-Dw14.

Alloreactive T-cell clones were used to study allodeterminants associated with the HLA-DR1, -DR4, and -DRw14 allelic families. Three clones derived by priming against the DR4,Dw14 alloantigen were tested against a panel of HLA-D homozygous B-cell lines and homozygous and heterozygous peripheral blood lymphocytes. Each clone was blocked by monoclonal antibodies specific for HLA-DR, but not HLA-DQ or -DP, molecules, and each showed a unique pattern of allorecognition when tested against the cell panel. Clone 14B appeared to recognize a specific sequence, termed L67-A74, comprised of amino acids in the third hypervariable region of the alpha-helix of the DR beta 1 molecule, and expressed on certain DR1-, DR4-, and DRw14-positive cells. Clone EMO25 recognized the same L67-A74 sequence, but only when expressed on DR4-positive cells, suggesting a role for residues in the first and second hypervariable regions of DR4-positive DR beta 1 molecules in T-cell recognition. Clone EM036 also recognized the L67-A74 sequence, but only when expressed on DR4,Dw14.1-positive cells, implicating residues at positions 57 and 86 of the alpha-helix in T-cell recognition. These results demonstrate the range of specific T-cell responses that are possible against alloepitopes expressed by a single class II allele (Dw14), and are an indication of the diverse regions of the class II molecule that can contribute to allorecognition sites.     

HLA-Dw/LD directed cytotoxic T cell clones

T lymphocyte clones were derived by micromanipulation from an MLC between a stimulator and responder matched for class I but mismatched for class II HLA antigens; among the possible stimulating antigens were DR4 and Dw4. Two of the clones, when tested for cytotoxicity on a panel of DR4 positive and negative targets, appeared to recognize a determinant closely associated with Dw4, but did not lyse, with one exception, targets expressing other DR4 associated Dw specificities or DR4 negative targets. Blocking studies, using monoclonal antibodies directed against monomorphic epitopes on class I or class II molecules, revealed that the cytotoxic activity of these clones was strongly inhibited by an anti-class II (L-243) but not by an anti-class I (w6/32) monoclonal antibody. Both clones were T3⁺, T4⁺, T8^?. These findings show that cytotoxic T cell clones, (directed against class II antigens), may have specificity that correlates with a T lymphocyte-defined LD/Dw determinant. The blocking experiments using monoclonal antibodies give further support to the idea that these clones recognize determinant(s) on a class II molecule. The cell surface phenotyping results are in agreement with previous reports that most anti-class II cytotoxic clones have a T4⁺ T8^? phenotype.     

Variants of HLA-DRw52 defined by T lymphocyte clones

Polymorphism within the gene encoding the DRw52 allospecificity was studied with DRw52-specific proliferative T lymphocyte clones. Three clones, C6, E3 and ZUK16, were generated by intra-DRw52 priming in mixed lymphocyte culture and tested against an HLA-D homozygous reference cell panel. The reactivity of each clone could be specifically inhibited by anti-DR, but not anti-DQ or anti-DP, monoclonal antibodies. Clone C6 identified a DRw52 variant termed 52a that was predominantly expressed by HLA-B8, DR3+ and DRw13, Dw18+ cells. Clone E3 identified a variant termed 52b which was predominantly expressed by HLA- B18,DR3+, DRw11,Dw5+ and DRw14,Dw9+ cells. Clone ZUK16 identified a variant termed 52c which was predominantly expressed by DRw13,Dw19+ cells. The DRw52a, 52b and 52c variants correspond to the Dw24, DW25 and Dw26 alleles defined by the WHO HLA 1987 Nomenclature Committee. Together, clones E3 and ZUK16 appeared to identify a fourth DRw52 variant termed 52d which was expressed by two cells, one DR3,Dw“3.3”+ and one DRw14, Dw“9.2”+. A fifth Drw52 variant termed 52e, expressed by a DRw13,Dw“OMW”+ cell, was suggested by the absence of reactivity with any of the three T cell clones. These data thus demonstrate the existence of three well-defined allelic variants of DRw52 and indicate that there are at least two additional variants. The recognition of these polymorphisms by alloreactive T cells provides one measure of their functional significance.     

Alloreactive T cell recognition of the HLA-DR beta N-terminal polymorphic region

T cell alloreactivity, originally discovered as a tissue transplantation effect, is believed to be a manifestation of the normal major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction of antigen presentation by accessory cells to T cells. The molecular features of the human class II-MHC proteins (HLA) which are recognized by alloreactive T cells are not at present understood, although they are clearly related to the polymorphic nature of the MHC proteins. Human CD4+ T cell clones were selected by response to the HLA-DR2 peptides beta 1-15 or beta 51-65, in an MHC-restricted manner. In addition, these clones respond to cell lines expressing the DR2 haplotype, without the requirement for accessory antigen presenting cells. DR2 beta peptide 1-15 blocks the T cell alloresponse and polymorphic residues are shown to stimulate the peptide-specific response of these clones. Thus, the polymorphic residues contained within the DR beta sequence 1-15 are demonstrated to be directly recognized by alloreactive T cells.     

Characterization of the specificity and genetic restriction of human CD4+ cytotoxic T cell clones reactive to capsid antigen of rubella virus.

Using 11 overlapping synthetic peptides covering more than 95% of the amino acid sequence of capsid protein of rubella virus, 7 CD4+ T cell clones (R10, R11, R18, A2, A10, A11, and A12) isolated from 2 rubella seropositive donors reacted strongly to rubella capsid peptides C6 (residues 119-152), C9 (residues 205-233), or C11 (residues 255-280), respectively, in both proliferation and cytotoxicity assay. Truncated peptides C6E (residues 125-139), C9B (residues 205-216), and C11E (residues 260-272) were shown to be involved directly to the T cell determinants of C6, C9, and C11, respectively. Genetic restriction of these T cell clones was analyzed by using human cell lines with various HLA-DR phenotypes as targets and/or antigen-presenting cells in cytotoxicity assay and/or proliferation assays. The results indicated that the recognition of peptide C6 by T cell clones (R11 and R18) was associated with DRw9 molecule, while the HLA restriction element of the responses of other T cell clones (A2 and A11, A10, and A12) that reacted with peptide C9 or C11 was DR4 molecule. However, there may be a cross-recognition by the T cell clone (A12) between DR1 and DR4 subtypes.     

Allo-cross-reactivity of a human neuraminidase-specific T cell clone dependent on presentation of an endogenous B cell-specific antigen.

T cells specific for foreign antigen recognize a complex of peptides and self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and can also cross-react with allo-MHC molecules. It remains controversial, however, what alloreactive T cells exactly recognize. It has been proposed that alloreactive T cells recognize endogenous peptides presented by allo-MHC molecules. To test this hypothesis, we examined an influenza virus-specific T cell clone (6H5), specific for neuraminidase N2 and restricted by HLA-DR1. In the absence of influenza virus, this clone cross-reacted with HLA-DR1Dw1+ but not with HLA-DR1Dw20+ Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cells (B-LCL). Cold target inhibition experiments and the rearrangement pattern of the T cell receptor beta chain indicated that 6H5 was a monoclonal T cell population most likely using the same T cell receptor for both responses. To determine whether determinants other than HLA-DR1Dw1+ B-LCL or activated B cells, but, surprisingly, not to other cell types expressed HLA-DR1Dw1, including monocytes and transfected L cells. These experiments further support the concept that recognition of allogeneic MHC (in this case HLA-DR1Dw1) may result from a cross-reactivity of T cells specific for a complex of foreign antigen and self-MHC (neuraminidase N2 and HLA-DR1Dw20). Furthermore, allorecognition of T cell clone 6H5 appears to depend upon the recognition of a complex of allogeneic MHC and a cell-type specific endogenous peptide presented by activated B cells.     

Structural model for T-cell recognition of HLA class II-associated alloepitopes.

In an effort to investigate the structure-function relationship of HLA class II molecules vis-à-vis alloepitope expression, cloned T-cell reagents were used to define polymorphic epitopes associated with DR and DQ molecules. DNA sequences of genes encoding allelic or isotypic DR or DQ molecules that appear to express the same T-cell-defined epitopes were compared in an attempt to identify association of shared sequences with shared epitopes. When sequence sharing is associated with shared epitope expression, we suggest that it is the shared sequence that encodes the epitope in question. Based on the hypothetical three-dimensional structure of the class II molecule, an approximation is made as to which parts of the HLA class II molecule are involved in alloepitope expression. T-cell clones were generated from cells primed against HLA-DR2 haplotypes representing the cellularly defined subgroups Dw2 or Dw21 (previously designated MN2, FJ0, or Tb24). Those clones determined to be DR- or DQ-directed based on monoclonal antibody inhibition assays were tested by panel cell analysis utilizing DR2-positive and DR2-negative target cells. The data support the concept that amino acids 67, 70, 71, and 74 for DR molecules and amino acids 57, 70, and 71 for DQ molecules, which appear to comprise one face of the alpha helix, are of primary importance in T-cell recognition. In other cases, sharing of both the second hypervariable region (amino acids 25-33) and the third hypervariable region (amino acids 67-74) appears necessary to explain epitope sharing for DR molecules. We emphasize that the involvement of these two hypervariable regions may indicate that alloepitope expression involves the complex of class II molecule plus peptide, with the second HVR primarily involved in determining which peptides are bound and the third in T-cell receptor (TcR) recognition and/or peptide binding; we do not rule out that conformational changes of the second HVR can induce conformational changes in the third HVR. Finally, shared alloepitopes detected by some clones could not be explained based on shared primary sequences.     

Functional analysis of MHC class II-restricted T cells derived from a Caucasian with a DR4, Dw15, DQw8 haplotype

Rabies virus-specific CD4+ T lymphocyte clones were isolated from a Caucasian male vaccine recipient (DR4/7, DQw2/w8; DPw4) and studied for their major histocompatibility complex restricting elements. None of the rabies-specific T-cell clones could be induced to proliferate to antigen by either lymphoblastoid cells or DR-transfected L cells expressing DR4 molecules of the Dw subtypes commonly found on Caucasian individuals (Dw4, Dw10, Dw13, Dw14). The HLA-Dw subtype of the rabies vaccine recipient was determined by conventional mixed lymphocyte culture, and the results revealed that this individual had a DR4 (Dw15), DR7 (Dw7) phenotype. The presence of the DR4, Dw15 antigen was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing of the DR4B1 gene corresponding to the DRB1*0405 allele. Significant antigen-induced T-cell proliferative responses were obtained with two DR4, Dw15, DQw4 homozygous lymphoblastoid cell lines of Japanese origin (HAS-15 and KT-3) and with a L-cell transfectant expressing the DR4, Dw15 molecule. The existence of the DR4, Dw15 antigen in the Japanese has been reported to be associated with the DQw4 specificity. However, the presence of DQw8 (previously designated DQw3.2) and the absence of DQw4 in the lymphoblastoid cells of the Caucasian rabies vaccine was confirmed with monoclonal antibodies IVD12 (anti-DQw7 + DQw8 + DQw9) and HU46 (anti-DQw4) and by the reactivity of a DQw8-restricted antigen-specific T-cell clone. These studies indicate, contrary to previous findings, that the DR4, Dw15 molecule may be present in Caucasian (non-Japanese) individuals in association with DQw8.     

Antigen presentation to specific T cells by Ia molecules selectively altered by site-directed mutagenesis

A functional analysis of mutant class II molecules was conducted to identify regions important for antigen-specific T cell activation. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to construct a panel of mutant A beta k genes containing either single or multiple d allele substitutions in the beta 1 domain. The product of each of these genes was expressed with either the A alpha d or A alpha k polypeptide in the Ia-negative B cell lymphoma M12.C3. These mutant class II molecule-bearing cells were tested for their ability to present antigen to a panel of Ak-restricted T cell clones specific for various epitopes of myoglobin. Results from this analysis demonstrate that T helper clones recognized complex determinants interacting with multiple residues on the beta 1 domain and also requiring the haplotype-matched alpha 1 domain. This is in contrast to monoclonal antibodies that recognize a domain-specific, immunodominant region involving residues 40, 63, and 65-67. Every T helper clone was found to interact with a distinct pattern of residues, even among clones recognizing the same combination of peptide and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule. The 3 for 1 residue substitution between k and d alleles at residues 65-67 was one of the most important, because it resulted in loss of ability to present antigen to 7 of 7 I-Ak-restricted T cell clones. These residues have been shown previously to comprise the immunodominant allo-specific serological determinants and to stimulate some alloreactive T cell clones. Substitution at residues 12 and 13 also abrogated antigen presentation to all the T cell clones, but this may be a consequence of a conformational change due to altered alpha beta chain pairing. Substitution at position 9, which is predicted to be located in the floor of the peptide-binding groove where it should not interact directly with the T cell receptor, enhanced presentation of the antigenic site 102-118 to some T cells and diminished it to others. This finding suggests a most interesting conclusion that the same antigenic site may bind in different conformations or orientations to the same MHC molecule, although an indirect effect on the conformation of the MHC molecule itself cannot be excluded. Substitutions at residues 85, 86 and 88 also abrogated the response of one T cell clone but not others specific for the same peptide with the same Ia molecule.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

DR αβ dimers released from complexes with invariant chain fail to stimulate alloreactive T cell clones

To demonstrate that DR αβ dimers still complexed to invariant chain (Ii) have not yet acquired peptides recognized by alloreactive T cells, complexes between DR molecules and Ii isolated from Epstein-Barr-virus (EBV)-transformed B cells were analyzed by affinity chromatography and gel filtration. First, it was shown that DR/Ii complexes inserted into artificial planar membranes (PM) failed to stimulate proliferative response of five alloreactive T cell clones and a polyclonal alloreactive Tcell line, while PM bearing mature DR αβ dimers from the same EBV-B cells were stimulatory for the Tcell clones and the Tcell line. These findings indicate that either Ii inhibits binding of peptides to DR molecules or Ii hinders T cells recognition of peptide/DR complexes. Second, to discriminate between these two possibilities, DR αβ dimers, which were artificially released from complexes between DR molecules and Ii, were inserted into PM. These DR αβ dimers were devoid of alloreactive stimulatory capacity while fully capable of binding and presenting a tetanus toxin synthetic peptide to a specific Tcell clone, indicating that DR molecules released from complexes with Ii are empty. This study, by showing that DR molecules bound to Ii do not bear peptides recognized by alloreactive T cells, supports the notion that association of Ii with class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules prevents premature peptide loading and hence favors encounter with peptides derived from proteins of the extracellular compartment. Since allogeneic class II MHC molecules released from complexes with Ii were not stimulatory for five out of five alloreactive Tcell clones and a polyclonal alloreactive Tcell line, these data also indicate that, in most cases, alloreactive T cells recognize ligands constituted by complexes between allogeneic class II MHC molecules and specific peptides which derive from the antigen-presenting cells themselves or serum proteins.