Lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: the value of breast lymphoscintigraphy in breast sentinel node staging

A 28-year-old woman with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast diagnosed by excisional biopsy underwent lumpectomy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and sentinel node dissection. This was followed by an immediate completion axillary node dissection using a hand-held gamma probe and isosulfan blue to map the lymphatics. Preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage into the axilla and an apparent area of radiocolloid accumulation in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast. Because our protocol called only for removal of axillary sentinel nodes, the inferior hemisphere radiocolloid accumulation was not removed. The patient did not complete local regional therapy with breast irradiation and developed a mass in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast, which on biopsy was shown to be metastatic breast cancer in an intramammary lymph node. This case illustrates the potential value of breast lymphoscintograms to identify unusual sites of lymphatic drainage that may prove to be clinically relevant.     

The hidden sentinel node and SPECT/CT in breast cancer patients

Purpose  In a minority of breast cancer patients, lymphoscintigraphy shows no lymphatic drainage and ‘hidden’ sentinel nodes may remain undiscovered. The purpose of this study was to explore the additional value of the recently introduced hybrid SPECT/CT in breast cancer patients with axillary non-visualisation on planar images. The role of blue dye and careful palpation of the axilla was evaluated in patients in whom axillary sentinel nodes remained hidden after SPECT/CT. Methods  Fifteen breast cancer patients with non-visualisation on planar lymphoscintigraphy and 13 women with only extra-axillary sentinel nodes underwent SPECT/CT following late planar imaging without re-injection of the radiopharmaceutical. Results  SPECT/CT visualised lymphatic drainage in eight of the 15 patients (53%) with non-visualisation on planar imaging, depicted nine of the 14 harvested sentinel nodes (64%) and three of five tumour-positive sentinel nodes. In two of the 13 patients (15%) with only extra-axillary sentinel nodes on their planar lymphoscintigram, SPECT/CT showed an axillary sentinel node that appeared to be uninvolved. Careful exploration of the axilla with the combined use of blue dye, a gamma probe and intra-operative palpation revealed an axillary sentinel node in the remaining 18 patients. SPECT/CT showed the exact anatomical location of all visualised sentinel nodes. Conclusion  SPECT/CT discovered ‘hidden’ sentinel nodes in the majority of patients with non-visualisation, but was less valuable in patients with only extra-axillary lymphatic drainage on the planar images. Exploration of the axilla in patients with persistent non-visualisation improved the identification of axillary (involved) sentinel nodes.     

Impact of internal mammary sentinel node imaging in breast cancer

A 28-year-old woman underwent mammary lymphoscintigraphy for evaluation of the sentinel node status of a small infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the central, lower, and outer quadrant of the left breast confirmed by biopsy. The patient was scheduled for lumpectomy and sentinel node biopsy. Lymphoscintigraphy showed increased uptake at two sites of the peritumorally injected tracer (60 MBq; 1.6 mCi rhenium sulfur nanocolloid) in internal mammary nodes, two of which were located most proximal to the tumor and related to the tumor by two distinct lymphatic ducts. An axillary lymph node was also detected. At surgery, the gamma probe confirmed the location of all the hot spots, and four nodes were harvested: one axillary, two first internal mammary nodes in the third intercostal space, and one internal mammary node in the second intercostal space. Histologic analysis revealed that the axillary sentinel node was free of disease, but the two first intramuscular sentinel nodes were metastatic. The second-echelon internal mammary node above the sentinel nodes (second intercostal space) was free of disease. This case shows the benefit of imaging all the drainage pathways of a breast tumor and retrieving nonaxillary lymph nodes, which may be the only positive nodes. As a result of the findings, the patient's prognosis may be altered and the subsequent therapeutic approach may be modified. Although exclusive involvement of the internal mammary chain is well established and relatively rare (occurring in approximately 5% of cases), it is important to remember that the axillary status of a breast tumor is not the only major prognostic factor.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结核素显像新进展

乳腺癌是全球女性发病率最高的恶性肿瘤, 为保证患者的生存率、减少术后并发症, 20世纪90年代用"腋窝前哨淋巴结活检术取代腋窝淋巴结清扫"的观点被提出并逐渐发展成为乳腺癌患者保乳术的常规方法。除腋窝前哨淋巴结外, 内乳前哨淋巴结的重要性同样不容忽视, 但是否将其作为前哨淋巴结活检的对象仍存在争议。面对目前形势, 核医学工作者做了大量研究, 在保证腋窝前哨淋巴结高显示率的同时尽可能提高内乳前哨淋巴结的显示率。笔者对近十年来国内外研究者在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结核素显像中的核素示踪剂、注射技术、显像仪器等方面的最新进展进行综述。     

Advantages of upright position imaging with medium-energy collimator for sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the advantage of upright position imaging with a medium-energy collimator for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN). METHODS: Thirty-four patients with operable breast cancer underwent sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy with 99mTc-tin colloid. Images were obtained in 5 different positions and paired images from the same patient were compared using side-by-side interpretation. Images were compared in 3 groups: group 1 (anterior view); supine (SAV) vs. upright (UAV), group 2 (oblique view); supine (SOV) vs. upright (UOV), and group 3 (oblique view); modified supine (MOV) vs. UOV. Image quality was evaluated using a 3-grade scale of clear, faint, and equivocal depiction, and correlated to 3 parameters: distance from injection site to lymph node (hot node), counts in hot node, and image contrast. Parameters in group 1 were compared by classifying the primary tumor site into 4 subregions. RESULTS: Image quality in all 3 groups was more enhanced on the image obtained in the upright position than that in the supine position. Obtaining images in an upright position increased the mean distances by 1.5-3.2 cm, and mean contrasts were significantly increased by 0.13-0.31 (p < 0.05). It was shown that image quality was more greatly affected by image contrast than by counts in the hot node. Image contrast of 0.5 seemed an appropriate threshold level for detection of the hot node. On comparison of tumor sites, the upper outer quadrant (C) region of the 4 subregions demonstrated greater contrast enhancement on upright position images. CONCLUSION: Clinical images obtained in an upright position with a medium-energy collimator were superior to those obtained in a supine position. Use of this procedure is recommended to enhance lymph node detection on sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy.     

Non-visualization of sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer

Histological evaluation of the first draining lymph node (sentinel node) in the axilla of patients with breast cancer has dramatically altered the surgical approach to these patients, with sparing of the axilla if no tumour cells are identified. In a fraction of patients imaged after peri-tumoural injection of the breast, there is no visualization of the sentinel node. We retrospectively analysed the status of patients whose nodes were visualized and of patients whose nodes failed to visualize, to define the variables associated with non-visualization of the sentinel node. Seventy-four breast cancer patients were imaged following peri-tumoural injection of filtered 99Tc(m)-sulfur colloid, immediately and up to 5.5 h post-injection. The scintigraphic data were analysed with reference to the patient's age, histology, grade, site and size of tumour, previous diagnostic procedure and time interval to scan, using univariate analysis and a logistic regression model. A sentinel node was visualized in 53 of 74 women (72%). Comparison of patients with non-visualized versus visualized sentinel nodes disclosed no statistically significant univariate relation to age of the patients (P = 0.10), size of tumour (P = 0.46), site (P = 0.26), histology [invasive ductal carcinoma in 16 of 20 (80%) non-visualized cases, and in 43 of 53 (81%) visualized patients], prior excision biopsy (P = 0.36) and time interval to surgery (P = 0.29). Tumour grade was the only significant variable on univariate analysis (P = 0.03), though multivariate analysis showed that none of the independent parameters were statistically significant. In 39 patients with an upper outer quadrant tumour, the location of the sentinel node was not limited to the axilla and even crossed the midline of the breast. Our results show that none of the independent variables is associated with non-visualization of sentinel lymph node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy of patients with breast cancer, though the tumour grade may have contributed to non-visualization of this node. The non-axillary drainage from upper outer quadrant tumours suggests the routine use of lymphoscintigraphy prior to axillary dissection.     

Technical aspects of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A significant morbidity risk is associated with axillary nodal dissections for breast cancer. Many treatment decisions are based on axillary nodal status. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy have been investigated to determine if the histology of the sentinel node reflects the remaining lymph node basin. We describe the technical aspects of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer. METHODS: Ninety-three patients had lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer. Patients with palpable lesions had 4 concentric injections around the site and lesions requiring localization had injections made through tubing connected to the localizing wire introducer needle. Immediate static images were acquired and the sentinel node was marked for surgery. Marks were reverified using a handheld gamma probe. RESULTS: Lymph nodes were visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in 87% of cases. Time to visualization of lymph nodes ranged from 1-120 min with a mean of 28 min. An average of 1.5 nodes were visualized. The overall success rate for identifying the sentinel node at time of surgery was 85%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer is a detailed procedure that requires coordination with radiology and surgery teams to ensure proper identification of sentinel lymph nodes.     

Feasibility of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in stage I testicular cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node identification in testicular cancer. Five patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer were prospectively included. A single dose of technetium-99m nanocolloid (mean dose 99 MBq, volume 0.2 ml) was injected into the funiculus in the first patient and into the testicular parenchyma in the following four patients. Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy was performed over 10 min, followed by early and late static images after 15 min and 2 to 24 h, respectively. Lymphoscintigraphy was followed by laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy on the same day in the last two patients using patent blue dye and an endoscopic gamma probe. The funicular administration route showed five hot spots in the right inguinal region after 2 h. Intratesticular administration resulted in sentinel node visualisation in three of the four patients. Dynamic images showed afferent lymphatic vessels to one sentinel node in the left para-aortic region in two patients and two sentinel nodes in the left para-aortic region in another patient. Sentinel nodes were intraoperatively identified in one of two patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration. It is concluded that lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node identification is feasible in stage I testicular cancer using intratesticular radiocolloid administration.     

Breast cancer with metastatic invasion of the sentinel lymph node in an internal mammary chain and with axillary chains free of tumor lesionS

The lymphoscintigraphy is a widely accepted procedure to detect the sentinel node in breast cancer. This is a case report of a 45 year old woman diagnosed of breast cancer who was referred to the nuclear medicine facility to perform the sentinel node detection procedure. The lymphoscintigraphy prior to surgery shows a double pathway in the tracer migration: one going to the axillary area and the second to the internal mammary chain and shows hot spots that represent the sentinel nodes. After surgical removal of those nodes, the pathological analysis report indicated tumor infiltration in the internal mammary chain sentinel node with all axillary nodes free of malignant cells. The aim of this report is to emphasize the importance of performing a pathological analysis of all the sentinel nodes detected in lymphoscintigraphy.     

Intramammary sentinel lymph node preoperative identification with SPECT/CT in a patient with breast cancer. Clinical meaning and relevance

We present the case of a patient with breast cancer who underwent selective sentinel lymph node biopsy. An intramammary sentinel lymph node was identified with SPECT/CT in the preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. We describe our diagnostic and therapeutic procedure regarding this finding and the literature review to evaluate the clinical significance of their identification and metastases, especially in regards to more appropriate axillary management. Further studies with more statistical significance are necessary to elucidate the most suitable attitude when an intramammary sentinel lymph node is identified with the lymphoscintigraphy.     

乳癌哨兵淋巴结检测临床应用

目的：探讨乳癌哨兵淋巴结活检预测腋窝淋巴结转移状态的可靠性.方法：本组为2000年11月至2004年2月我院收治的140例乳癌患者.术中应用国产亚甲蓝注射液4～6 ml肿瘤上、外、下半圆形皮下连续注射,134例行乳癌改良根治术或患侧乳腺区段切除加腋窝淋巴结清扫术.术后解剖蓝染淋巴管,沿着色淋巴管找到蓝染的哨兵淋巴结.哨兵淋巴结及腋窝淋巴结常规行石蜡病理切片检查.5例行乳腺区段切除加哨兵淋巴结活检,1例行全乳切除加哨兵淋巴结活检（冰冻、石蜡病理检查SLN转移阴性）,未行全腋窝淋巴结清扫.结果：140例患者中136例检出哨兵淋巴结,检出率97.14%,灵敏度 88.71%,准确率94.31%,阴性预测值89.71%,假阴性率11.29%,仅哨兵淋巴结阳性7例.结论：应用亚甲蓝注射液淋巴结着色方法行乳癌哨兵淋巴结活检可以准确地预测腋窝淋巴结转移状态.     

Fusion lymphoscintigraphy with a 24-hour Tc-99m MDP bone scan for sentinel lymph node detection and imaging

A 62-year-old woman with right breast carcinoma who had a breast biopsy 3 weeks earlier was referred for a whole-body Tc-99m MDP bone scan to identify possible osseous metastases. Twenty-four hours later, she underwent lymphoscintigraphy using four peritumoral injections of 250 microCi filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid of 0.22 microm each. The lymphoscintigraphic images showed good delineation of three right axillary lymph nodes in relation to the rib cage. Performing a bone scan just before lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node detection may help the surgeon to identify sentinel lymph nodes. This is more anatomically precise than using a flood source to delineate body contour. A Tc-99m MDP bone scan followed by lymphoscintigraphy should be considered in patients with breast carcinoma who will have both bone imaging and lymphoscintigraphy.     

Biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes guided by lymphoscintigraphic mapping in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical success rate of sentinel node biopsy with lymphoscintigraphy in women with breast cancer and the frequency with which sentinel node biopsy obviated axillary dissection. Factors affecting the success rate of sentinel node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review revealed 119 women with breast cancer who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy at our institution during the study period. A planned axillary dissection was performed in 13 of the first 16 patients; otherwise, axillary dissection was only performed if tumor was present in sentinel nodes or if the sentinel node biopsy was unsuccessful. RESULTS. Sentinel node biopsy was successful in 96% of patients, and sentinel node metastases were found in 20%. In 78% of patients, a negative sentinel node biopsy obviated axillary dissection. Prior excisional biopsy was not associated with a failed sentinel node biopsy (p = 0.750) but was associated with failed lymphoscintigraphy (p = 0.01). Successful lymphoscintigraphy was associated with successful sentinel node biopsy (p < 0.0001). No association was found between the histology or size of the tumor and a failed sentinel node biopsy (p = 0.46 and p = 0.1, respectively) or failed lymphoscintigraphy (p = 0.36 and p = 0.47, respectively). CONCLUSION. Sentinel node biopsy guided by lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe, and isosulfan blue dye is an effective alternative to axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer. Lymphoscintigraphy improved the success rate of sentinel node biopsy. Large tumor size or prior excisional biopsy should not prevent patients from having sentinel node biopsy.     

Three-dimensional fusion imaging of lymphoscintigraphy and MDCT for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) fusion imaging of lymphoscintigraphy with 99mTc phytate and MDCT (four-slice CT) for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Volume-rendering images generated by MDCT were fused with lymphoscintigrams on a personal computer. The subjects were 7 patients with clinically negative nodes. In all patients, sentinel nodes were identified by lymphoscintigraphy, and the anatomical locations of sentinel nodes were clearly demonstrated by 3D-fusion imaging. 3D-fusion imaging of lymphoscintigraphy and MDCT is expected to be a promising method for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.     

淋巴显像及术中γ探测定位活检乳腺癌前哨淋巴结

目的：探讨淋巴显像及术中γ探测定位活组织检查乳腺癌前硝淋巴结的临床价值。方法：术前在乳腺肿瘤表面正中皮内注射37－74MBq ^99Tcm-大分子右旋糖酐（Dx)，用淋巴显像和术中γ探测定位乳腺癌 前硝淋巴结，术中切除前 淋巴结，而后行腑窝淋巴结清扫术，两标本连同切除的乳腺肿物同时送病理检查，分析和前哨淋巴结转移与腋窝淋巴结的关系。结果：31例均行淋巴显像和术中γ探测定位乳腺癌前哨淋巴结患者中，检出率为100％，有3例前哨淋巴结病理检查呈假阴性，假阴性率为25％，结论：术中γ探测是乳腺癌前哨淋巴结定位最可靠的手段。以乳腺 癌前哨淋巴结活组织检查取代常规腑窝淋巴结清扫术尚需进一步研究。     

Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer: the role of SPECT-CT

Purpose Lymph node status is a major factor in determining the stage, appropriate therapy and outcome in patients with breast cancer. It is therefore of clinical importance to accurately identify all sentinel nodes (SNs) for each individual tumour before surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of SPECT-CT lymphoscintigraphy in SN identification in patients with breast cancer.Methods Lymphoscintigraphy comprising planar and SPECT-CT acquisition was performed in 157 consecutive patients with breast cancer (mean age 54.7±10.6, range 27–81 years) with a palpable mass (n=100), with a non-palpable mass (n=52) or post lumpectomy (n=5). Planar and SPECT-CT images were interpreted separately and the two imaging techniques were compared with respect to their ability to identify hot nodes.Results Planar imaging alone was negative for identification of hot nodes in 15% of the patients. SPECT-CT alone was negative in 10% and both techniques were negative in 9% of the patients. Forty-six of the total of 361 (13%) hot nodes identified by lymphoscintigraphy were detected only on SPECT-CT, including 21 nodes obscured by the scattered radiation from the injection site, nine adjacent nodes misinterpreted on planar images as a single node and 16 nodes which were missed on planar images and detected on SPECT data. SPECT-CT detected additional sites of drainage unexpected on planar images, including axillary (n=23 patients), internal mammary (n=5 patients), interpectoral (n=3 patients) and intramammary (n=2 patients) lymph node sites. Fourteen of the 329 (4%) hot lesions seen on planar images were false positive non-nodal sites of uptake that were accurately assessed by SPECT-CT and further validated by surgery. In a single patient, SPECT-CT was negative while planar images identified the SN.Conclusion SPECT-CT may improve the preoperative localisation of draining nodes in patients with breast cancer. It may detect hot nodes missed by planar imaging, exclude non-nodal false positive sites of uptake and accurately localise axillary and extra-axillary nodes.     

Correlation of number and identification of sentinel nodes during radiographer led lymphoscintigraphy prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients

PurposeThe sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) concept using the cutaneous (subdermal) peri-areolar approach is rapidly emerging as the technique for axillary staging in breast cancer. The procedure indicates whether axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is necessary, therefore drastically minimising the invasiveness of surgical treatment. The SLNB concept is based on evidence suggesting that malignant disease primarily affects the sentinel node (SN) before being disseminated into the axillary lymph nodes (ALNs).ObjectiveThis study was to define the role of lymphoscintigraphy in the visualisation of SNs during SLNB and to establish the correlation between the number of SNs identified on lymphoscintigraphy to the number of surgically identified SNs.MethodThe study was a non-experimental, correlation study utilising quantitative data. Lymphoscintigraphy reports and histology results of 55 female breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB with partial or total back-up ALND, were retrospectively evaluated.ResultsA maximum of 2 and a minimum of 0 sentinel nodes were visualised on lymphoscintigraphy in 52 out of 55 patients. Successful lymphoscintigraphy was highly predictive (p ≤ 0.001) of a successful SLNB as all 52 patients (94.5%) proceeded to have successful SN/s identification. There was a significant association (p ≤ 0.05) between the number of SN/s visualised on lymphoscintigraphy and the number of SN/s identified during SLNB. Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of surgically identified SNs in 50.91% of cases (28/55).ConclusionConsidering that successful imaging effectively assures SN identification, the routine use of lymphoscintigraphy using the subdermal peri-areolar approach is fundamental in the reliable performance of SLNB.     

Intratumoral versus subareolar injection in breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy. A case report

The use of deep (intratumoral, peritumoral) and superficial (subdermal, subareolar) administration is recognized as valid in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Herein, we are presenting a clinical case in which a personalized methodology was a determining factor in axillary staging. Initially, the radiotracer was injected intratumorally guided by ultrasound. The ultrasound scan identified a previously unknown axillary lymphadenopathy, with focal cortical thickening, this being a non-specific ultrasound finding, but with possibility of biopsy. The lymphoscintigraphy did not show uptake in the mentioned node, hence, a second subareolar dose was administered. On this occasion, the lymphoscintigraphy detected drainage to the sentinel node, which was the only one positive for micrometastases.     

Evaluation of the sentinel lymph node combining SPECT/CT with the planar image and its importance for the surgical act

The sentinel node biopsy procedure is based on the hypothesis of the existence of an orderly and predictable pattern of lymphatic drainage to a regional lymph node basin. This results in the consideration of all lymph nodes with direct drainage from the primary tumor as sentinel nodes. The sentinel node is not necessarily the hottest or the most nearby node, although this is often the case. Lymphoscintigraphy has been an essential component for preoperative sentinel node identification. With the new generation of multimodality gamma cameras, SPECT/CT has been incorporated into the sentinel node procedure. The resulting SPECT/CT fused images depict sentinel nodes in an anatomical landscape providing a helpful roadmap for surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to define the role of SPECT/CT in relation to the classical planar lymphoscintigraphy for the identification of sentinel nodes. To understand the combined use of lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT, the criteria for sentinel node identification on preoperative images must be specified. The authors, based on their experience in this field, present tentative criteria to identify lymph nodes as sentinel nodes both in planar and SPECT/CT images and classify them into different categories. The use of these scintigraphic categories to characterize radioactive lymph nodes is also helpful for surgical decision making.     

A preliminary study on sentinel lymph node biopsy: feasibility and predictive ability in oral cavity cancer

The main factor that affects the prognosis of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is regional lymph node metastases. For this reason, the accurate evaluation of neck metastases is required for neck management. This study investigates the sentinel lymph node identification and the accuracy of the histopathology of the sentinel lymph node in patients with HNC. Eleven patients with histologically proven oral squamous cell carcinoma accessible to radiocolloid injection were enrolled in this study. Using both lymphoscintigraphy and a handheld gamma probe, the sentinel lymph node could be identified in all 11 patients. Subsequently, the sentinel lymph nodes and the neck dissection specimen were examined for lymph node involvement due to tumor. The histopathology of sentinel lymph nodes was consistent with the pathological N classification in all 11 patients. Furthermore, the histopathology of sentinel lymph nodes was superior to physical examination, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scan. The results of this study indicate that sentinel lymph node identification is technically feasible and predicts cervical metastases in patients with oral cavity cancer. This may be a useful diagnostic technique for identifying lymph node disease in staging lymph node dissection.