Harnessing nanomedicine for therapeutic intervention in glioblastoma

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Glioblastoma is a type of brain cancer arises from glial cells. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a subtype of glioblastoma, is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor. Currently, GBM therapy includes surgery and post-operative high-doses of radiation and chemotherapy. This therapeutic strategy has a limited contribution in extending the survival rate of GBM patients.

Areas covered: Herein, we focus on harnessing nanoscale drug delivery strategies to treat brain malignancies. Specifically, we briefly discuss the challenges facing GBM therapy such as restricted passage across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and low enhanced permeability and retention effect. Next, we describe different pathways to address these challenges. Finally, we discuss the field of nanomedicine, which emerged as a promising platform for drug delivery to brain malignancies.

Expert opinion: Countless strategies have been applied in preclinical and clinical settings to treat GBM. Among them is the use of different types of nanoparticles (NPs) and viruses with different approaches to cross or bypass the BBB. We suggest here a paradigm shift in thinking about crossing the BBB and tumor penetration as fundamental issues that need to be address in order to improve the therapeutic outcome in GBM     

Targeting the RAS oncogene

Introduction: The Ras proteins (K-Ras, N-Ras, and H-Ras) are GTPases that function as molecular switches for a variety of critical cellular activities and their function is tightly and temporally regulated in normal cells. Oncogenic mutations in the RAS genes, which create constitutively-active Ras proteins, can result in uncontrolled proliferation or survival in tumor cells.

Areas covered: The paper discusses three therapeutic approaches targeting the Ras pathway in cancer: i) Ras itself, ii) Ras downstream pathways, and iii) synthetic lethality. The most adopted approach is targeting Ras downstream signaling, and specifically the PI₃K-AKT-mTOR and Raf-MEK pathways, as they are frequently major oncogenic drivers in cancers with high Ras signaling. Although direct targeting of Ras has not been successful clinically, newer approaches being investigated in preclinical studies, such as RNA interference-based and synthetic lethal approaches, promise great potential for clinical application.

Expert opinion: The challenges of current and emerging therapeutics include the lack of “tumor specificity” and their limitation to those cancers which are “dependent” on aberrant Ras signaling for survival. While the newer approaches have the potential to overcome these limitations, they also highlight the importance of robust preclinical studies and bidirectional translational research for successful clinical development of Ras-related targeted therapies.     

Emerging immunotherapies for glioblastoma

Introduction: Immunotherapy for brain cancer has evolved dramatically over the past decade, owed in part to our improved understanding of how the immune system interacts with tumors residing within the central nervous system (CNS). Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, carries a poor prognosis (<15 months) and only few advances have been made since the FDA’s approval of temozolomide (TMZ) in 2005. Importantly, several immunotherapies have now entered patient trials based on promising preclinical data, and recent studies have shed light on how GBM employs a slew of immunosuppressive mechanisms that may be targeted for therapeutic gain. Altogether, accumulating evidence suggests immunotherapy may soon earn its keep as a mainstay of clinical management for GBM.

Areas covered: Here, we review cancer vaccines, checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell immunotherapy, and oncolytic virotherapy.

Expert opinion: Checkpoint blockade induces antitumor activity by preventing negative regulation of T-cell activation. This platform, however, depends on an existing frequency of tumor-reactive T cells. GBM tumors are exceptionally equipped to prevent this, occupying low levels of antigen expression and elaborate mechanisms of immunosuppression. Therefore, checkpoint blockade may be most effective when used in combination with a DC vaccine or adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells generated ex vivo. Both approaches have been shown to induce endogenous immune responses against tumor antigens, providing a rationale for use with checkpoint blockade where both primary and secondary responses may be potentiated.     

Preclinical models for pediatric solid tumor drug discovery: current trends,challenges and the scopes for improvement

Introduction: The enhancement in pediatric cancer survival achieved in the past few decades has been confined to low- and moderate-risk cancers, whereas no notable improvement in survival was observed in high-risk and advanced-stage childhood cancers. High attrition rate of candidate drugs in clinical trials is a major hurdle in the development of effective therapies for pediatric solid tumors. In order to reduce the failure rate of candidate drugs in clinical trials, more effective strategies are needed to enhance the predictability of preclinical testing.

Areas covered: The authors have described the current trends in preclinical drug development for treating pediatric solid tumors. Furthermore, the authors review their limitations and the available remedies, with regards to choice of models, pharmacokinetic considerations and the criteria for assessing the long-term efficacy of a candidate drug.

Expert opinion: In many solid tumors, common differences between pediatric and adult cancers have been observed, and therefore, clinical trials for pediatric solid tumors must be conducted on the basis of preclinical observations in pediatric solid tumor models. There is a need to invest in extensive preclinical testing on pediatric solid tumor models. None of the preclinical models can fully recapitulate the human cancers. Therefore, these limitations must be considered while conducting a preclinical trial. The dose and schedule of drugs used for preclinical testing must be clinically relevant. While testing the efficacy of drugs, the markers of apoptosis, drug resistance, hypoxia and tumor-initiating cells can inform us about the long-term therapeutic response of a cancer.     

Emerging immunotherapy for the treatment of esophageal cancer

Introduction: Esophageal cancer is the third most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite new therapies, the prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor with 5-year survival rates lower than 15%. Recently, immunotherapy has increasingly gained attention as a novel treatment strategy for advanced esophageal cancer.

Areas covered: Recent success of immunotherapy in treating other solid tumors has shed light on the utility of these approaches for esophageal cancers. Here, the authors focus on antibody-based, adoptive-cell-therapy-based, and vaccine-based immunotherapies, and briefly address their rationale, clinical data, and implications.

Expert opinion: Immunotherapy is now established to be a key treatment modality that can improve the outcomes of many cancer patients and appears to be ushering in a new era in cancer treatment. Checkpoint inhibitor drugs have shown preliminary favorable results in esophageal cancer treatment. Adoptive cell therapy and vaccine studies have also shown some promise in various clinical studies. Future endeavors will need to focus on identifying patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy, monitoring and managing immune responses and designing optimal combination strategies where immunotherapy agents are combined with other traditional treatment modalities.     

Update on bevacizumab and other angiogenesis inhibitors for brain cancer

Introduction: Primary and metastatic brain tumors remain a major challenge. The most common primary adult malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma (GBM), confers a dismal prognosis as does the development of CNS metastases for most systemic malignancies. Anti-angiogenic therapy has been a major clinical research focus in neuro-oncology over the past 5 years.

Areas covered: Culmination of this work includes US FDA accelerated approval of bevacizumab for recurrent GBM and the completion of two placebo-controlled Phase III studies of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed GBM. A multitude of anti-angiogenics are in evaluation for neuro-oncology patients but none has thus far surpassed the therapeutic benefit of bevacizumab.

Expert opinion: These agents demonstrate adequate safety and the majority of GBM patients derive benefit. Furthermore, their anti-permeability effect can substantially decrease tumor-associated edema leading to stable or improved neurologic function and quality of life. In particular, anti-angiogenics significantly prolong progression-free survival – a noteworthy achievement in the context of infiltrative and destructive brain tumors like GBM; however, in a manner analogous to other cancers, their impact on overall survival for GBM patients is modest at best. Despite substantial clinical research efforts, many fundamental questions regarding anti-angiogenic agents in brain tumor patients remain unanswered.     

Emerging from their burrow: Hedgehog pathway inhibitors for cancer

Introduction: Cancer treatment is moving away from conventional cytotoxic drugs and towards agents that target specific proteins and mechanisms important to cancer development or survival. The Hedgehog Pathway (HhP) is a signal transduction pathway and its constitutive activation is tumorigenic in basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The HhP enables phenotypic flexibility, and channels tumor-stroma interactions. As a result, it is over-expressed in numerous cancers as well as in the tumor microenvironment and may represent a promising therapeutic target.

Areas covered: In this article, we review the rationale for targeting HhP and its role as an oncogenic driver, in tumor epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and in the tumor microenvironment and describe the results of preclinical and clinical studies involving HhP inhibitors.

Expert opinion: HhP activation plays an important role in both the tumor microenvironment and tumor EMT which can lead to treatment resistance for a number of different malignancies. In addition to standard use in BCC, several HhP inhibitors are in preclinical, early, and mid-stage clinical development for other solid and hematologic malignancies.     

Investigational antibody drug conjugates for solid tumors

Introduction: Despite the progress made in the past 20 years in understanding the molecular events leading to the formation of cancer, the success of targeted antitumor agents in solid tumors has lagged behind the scientific discoveries. The most difficult to treat patient segments are those with refractory solid tumors, resistant to standard chemotherapy, and novel therapeutic compounds with improved therapeutic indexes are needed. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are poised to become an important class of cancer therapeutics, as evidenced by the promising objective response rates when administered as single agents to chemorefractory cancer patients.

Areas covered: The basic concept for ADCs is to combine the strengths of the two most successful classes of therapeutic compounds developed in oncology, the high selectivity of antibodies with the unrivaled potency of small molecules, with the goal to improve the therapeutic index. Currently, approximately 60 ADCs are being developed in oncology. Among them, about 20 are undergoing clinical testing, the majority of which are tubulin inhibitor-based immunoconjugates. Herein, we review ADCs targeting solid tumors, with the focus on 11 programs currently undergoing clinical development.

Expert opinion: Key challenges the ADC field is facing, including potency and safety, can be addressed effectively by introducing novel research concepts with transformational potential for ADC development.     

A review of in vitro and in vivo models of oesophageal and gastric cancer

Importance of the field: Oesophageal and gastric cancers are leading causes of cancer-related mortality. In the era of targeted therapy and individualized treatment strategies, novel treatments for upper-gastrointestinal cancers are only just emerging compared to significant advances in other solid tumour types such as colorectal, breast and lung cancers. Clinical trials are investigating the value of established targeted agents for the treatment of oesophageal and gastric malignancies; however none are used in routine clinical practice.

Areas covered in this review: In this review we have looked at current in vitro and in vivo models of oesophageal and gastric cancers which may improve our understanding of the biology of these tumours and lead to the development of new preventative, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

What the reader will gain: We discuss the limitations of our current models and the challenges associated with research into these cancers.

Take home message: The lack of appropriate models for drug development in oesophageal and gastric cancers has hindered the progress of targeted therapy in this field.     

Recent developments on immunotherapy for brain cancer

Introduction: Brain tumors are a unique class of cancers since they are anatomically shielded from normal immunosurveillance by the blood–brain barrier, lack a normal lymphatic drainage system and reside in a potently immunosuppressive environment. Of the primary brain cancers, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive in adults. Although treatment options include surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, the average lifespan of GBM patients remains at only 14.6 months post-diagnosis.

Areas covered: A review of key cellular and molecular immune system mediators in the context of brain tumors including TGF-β, cytotoxic T cells, Tregs, CTLA-4, PD-1 and IDO is discussed. In addition, prognostic factors, currently utilized immunotherapeutic strategies, ongoing clinical trials and a discussion of new or potential immunotherapies for brain tumor patients are considered.

Expert opinion: Current drugs that improve the quality of life and overall survival in patients with brain tumors, especially for GBM, are poorly effective. This disease requires a reanalysis of currently accepted treatment strategies, as well as newly designed approaches. Here, we review the fundamental aspects of immunosuppression in brain tumors, new and promising immunotherapeutic drugs as well as combinatorial strategies that focus on the simultaneous inhibition of immunosuppressive hubs, both in immune and brain tumor cells, which is critical to consider for achieving future success for the treatment of this devastating disease.     

The Safety of available immunotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Current standard of care involves maximal surgical resection combined with adjuvant chemoradiation. Growing support exists for a role of immunotherapy in treating these tumors with the goal of targeted cytotoxicity. Here we review data on the safety for current immunotherapies being tested in GBM.

Areas covered: Safety data from published clinical trials, including ongoing clinical trials were reviewed. Immunotherapeutic classes currently under investigation in GBM include various vaccination strategies, adoptive T cell immunotherapy, immune checkpoint blockade, monoclonal antibodies, and cytokine therapies. Trials include children, adolescents, and adults with either primary or recurrent GBM.

Expert opinion: Based on the reviewed clinical trials, the current immunotherapies targeting GBM are safe and well-tolerated with minimal toxicities which should be noted. However, the gains in patient survival have been modest. A safe and well-tolerated combinatory immunotherapeutic approach may be essential for optimal efficacy towards GBM.     

The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of lung cancer

Introduction: It is reported that cancer may arise in chronically inflamed tissue. There is mounting evidence suggesting that the connection between inflammation and lung cancer is not coincidental but may indeed be causal. The inflammatory molecules may be responsible for augmented macrophage recruitment, delayed neutrophil clearance and an increase in reactive oxygen species. The cytokines and growth factors unusually produced in chronic pulmonary disorders have been found to have harmful properties that pave the way for epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumor microenvironment. However, the role of inflammation in lung cancer is not yet fully understood.

Areas covered: The role of chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of lung cancer and some of the possible mechanisms involved, with particular focus on inflammatory mediators, genetic and epigenetic alterations, inflammatory markers, tumor microenvironment and anti-inflammatory drugs are discussed. A framework for understanding the connection between inflammation and lung cancer is provided, which may afford the opportunity to intercede in specific inflammatory damage mediating lung carcinogenesis and therapeutic resistance.

Expert opinion: Advances in tumor immunology support the clinical implementation of immunotherapies for lung cancer. Along with therapeutic benefits, immunotherapy presents the challenges of drug-related toxicities. Gene modification of immunocytokine may lower the associated toxic effects.     

MACC1 – a novel target for solid cancers

Introduction: The metastatic dissemination of primary tumors is directly linked to patient survival in many tumor entities. The previously undescribed gene metastasis-associated in colon cancer 1 (MACC1) was discovered by genome-wide analyses in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues. MACC1 is a tumor stage-independent predictor for CRC metastasis linked to metastasis-free survival.

Areas covered: In this review, the discovery of MACC1 is briefly presented. In the following, the overwhelming confirmation of these data is provided supporting MACC1 as a new remarkable biomarker for disease prognosis and prediction of therapy response for CRC and also for a variety of additional forms of solid cancers. Lastly, the potential clinical utility of MACC1 as a target for prevention or restriction of tumor progression and metastasis is envisioned.

Expert opinion: MACC1 has been identified as a prognostic biomarker in a variety of solid cancers. MACC1 correlated with tumor formation and progression, development of metastases and patient survival representing a decisive driver for tumorigenesis and metastasis. MACC1 was also demonstrated to be of predictive value for therapy response. MACC1 is a promising therapeutic target for anti-tumor and anti-metastatic intervention strategies of solid cancers. Its clinical utility, however, must be demonstrated in clinical trials.     

Telomeres as targets for anticancer therapies

Introduction: The limitless replicative potential of cancer cells relies on telomere integrity (which is guaranteed by a complex interaction between several specialized proteins and telomeric DNA) and the activation of specific mechanisms for telomere length maintenance. Two mechanisms are currently known in human cancer, namely telomerase activity and the alternative lengthening of telomere pathway.

Expert opinion: In this review, we summarize the available data concerning the therapeutic strategies proposed thus far and the current challenges posed for the development of innovative telomere-based therapeutic approaches with broad-spectrum anticancer activity and for their translation into the clinical setting.

Areas covered: Due to their essential role in tumor cell proliferation, telomere maintenance mechanisms have become extremely attractive targets for the development of new anticancer interventions. Although numerous efforts have been made to identify specific approaches to interfere with telomere maintenance mechanisms in human cancers, the only molecule currently tested in clinical trials is the oligonucleotide GRN163L. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that interfering with telomeres, through the direct targeting of telomeric G-quadruplex structures, may be a valuable antitumor therapeutic strategy, independent of the specific telomere maintenance mechanism operating in the tumor.     

Keratinocyte growth factor receptor: a therapeutic target in solid cancer

Introduction: The treatment effects of advanced solid cancer are unsatisfactory, and novel therapeutic approaches are much needed. Keratinocyte growth factor receptor (KGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is primarily localized on epithelial cells. KGFR may play important roles in epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation, epithelial wound repair, embryonic development, immunity, tumor formation and development.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the expression, function and mechanism of KGFR in solid cancer, and analyzes its value for the cancer therapy. Furthermore, this study discusses the limitations of KGFR-based therapy, and envisages future developments in the clinical applications of KGFR.

Expert opinion: KGFR may function as an ideal therapeutic target for solid cancer. Continued basic investigation of KGFR-mediated pathways will push insight into the novel strategies of target therapy. More in vivo studies and clinical trials should be performed to promote the translational bridging of the latest research into clinical application.     

Preclinical drug development for childhood cancer

Importance of the field: More effective drugs are needed to treat poor prognosis paediatric malignancies. Development of anticancer agents for childhood cancers faces several unique challenges compared with their adult counterparts.

Areas covered in this review: We demonstrate how recent advances in preclinical drug development may overcome these difficulties and challenges. We explain the role of academia, regulators and industry in this field, address issues with preclinical models and illustrate several examples of biology-driven drug development in childhood cancers.

What the reader will gain: Increased knowledge about preclinical drug development in paediatric oncology including different preclinical models, established preclinical research networks, and relationships among academia, industry and regulators, as illustrated by several examples of targeted agents in childhood solid malignancies.

Take home message: It is anticipated that emerging advanced preclinical models and testing platforms will provide a more efficient, biologically-driven rationale to support the use of targeted therapies in several malignancies such as neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma or high grade glioma which account for the majority of deaths related to childhood cancer.     

Immunotherapy for gastric cancers: emerging role and future perspectives

Introduction: The broad use of immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment paradigms of many solid tumors. Although chemotherapy remains the treatment backbone for advanced gastric cancer, improvements in its molecular characterization and progresses in understanding its underpinning biology have supported clinical development of novel immunotherapies. However, the results of recent trials testing these new agents raise the question on how to identify the patients that could greatly benefit.

Areas covered: This article summarizes the current understanding on the biology and the mechanisms underlying different clinical features of gastric cancers. Particularly, after a comprehensive literature search, we speculate whether specific molecular subsets of patients could derive more benefit from immunotherapy.

Expert commentary: Most cancers may evade the immune response, which is normally regulated by a delicate balance between activating and inhibitory signals. For example, both CTLA-4 and PD-1, once linked to PD-L1/2, may inhibit T-cell signaling. The use of agent to harness the power of the immune system appears to be the ultimate frontier in gastric cancer treatment. While anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are minimally active, there is growing evidence for the efficacy of PD1/-L1 inhibitors. The search of predictive factors for immunotherapy will provide key hints towards the optimal use of these agents.     

The cancer stem cell paradigm: a new understanding of tumor development and treatment

Importance of the field: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, and therefore remains a central focus of modern medical research. Accumulating evidence supports a ‘cancer stem cell’ (CSC) model – where cancer growth and/or recurrence is driven by a small subset of tumor cells that exhibit properties similar to stem cells. This model may provide a conceptual framework for developing more effective cancer therapies that target cells propelling cancer growth.

Areas covered in this review: We review evidence supporting the CSC model and associated implications for understanding cancer biology and developing novel therapeutic strategies. Current controversies and unanswered questions of the CSC model are also discussed.

What the reader will gain: This review aims to describe how the CSC model is key to developing novel treatments and discusses associated shortcomings and unanswered questions.

Take home message: A fresh look at cancer biology and treatment is needed for many incurable cancers to improve clinical prognosis for patients. The CSC model posits a hierarchy in cancer where only a subset of cells drive malignancy, and if features of this model are correct, has implications for development of novel and hopefully more successful approaches to cancer therapy.     

Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: advances and deficiencies

The concept of immunotherapy as a treatment for cancer patients has been in existence for decades. However, more recent immune therapeutic approaches have involved targeting of tumor-specific antigens. Although improvements have been made in using such immune stimulatory treatment strategies for a variety of solid cancers, the use of these strategies for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is lagging behind. Immunotherapeutic approaches for HNSCC are particularly complicated by the profound immune suppression that is induced by HNSCC, which potentially decreases the effectiveness of immune stimulatory efforts. Trials involving patients with various solid cancers have shown the enhanced effectiveness of combining various immunotherapeutic approaches or combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Treatment of HNSCC with such combination approaches has not been extensively investigated and has the added challenge of the need to overcome the HNSCC-induced immune suppression. This study focuses on clinical trials that have tested immunotherapeutic approaches for HNSCC patients and the challenges associated with such approaches. In addition, it will call attention to immunotherapeutic strategies that have been shown to be successful in the treatment of other solid cancers to identify potential strategies that may apply to the treatment of HNSCC.