A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: an update.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an important public health problem worldwide and in the United States, with approximately 25% of patients infected as neonates dying prematurely from cirrhosis or liver cancer. A treatment algorithm for CHB previously developed and published by a panel of United States hepatologists was revised based on new developments in the understanding of CHB, the availability of more sensitive molecular diagnostic testing, the addition of new treatments, and better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of approved therapies. This updated algorithm is based on available evidence using a systematic review of the scientific literature. Where data are lacking, the panel relied on clinical experience and consensus expert opinion. Serum HBV DNA can be detected at levels as low as 10 IU/mL using molecular assays and should be determined to establish a baseline level before treatment, monitor response to antiviral therapy, and survey for the development of drug resistance. The primary aim of antiviral therapy is durable suppression of serum HBV DNA to the lowest levels possible. The threshold level of HBV DNA for determination of candidacy for therapy is 20,000 IU/mL or more for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive CHB. A lower serum HBV DNA threshold of 2000 IU/mL or more is recommended for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative CHB, and 200 IU/mL or more for those with decompensated cirrhosis. Interferon alfa-2b, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and peginterferon alfa-2a all are approved as initial therapy for CHB and have certain advantages and disadvantages. Issues for consideration include efficacy, safety, incidence of resistance, method of administration, and cost.     

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: an update

The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is made using a combination of serological, virologic, biochemical, and histologic markers. The natural history of HBV infection can be divided into four phases: immune tolerance, immune clearance (HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B), inactive HBsAg carrier, and reactivation (HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B). Patients in the immune clearance and reactivation phases, with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels, are candidates for antiviral therapy. The primary goal of therapy for chronic hepatitis B is suppression of viral replication, which has been shown to reduce hepatic necroinflammation and retard progression of hepatic fibrosis. Long-term suppression of serum HBV DNA is likely to reduce progression to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation and decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B includes interferon alfa, peginterferon alfa-2a, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine. In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, antiviral treatment is indicated when the serum HBV DNA level is = or > 10(5) copies/mL (20,000 IU/mL) and the ALT level is elevated. For HBeAg-negative patients, the threshold for initiation of therapy is lower, i.e., a serum HBV DNA level = or > 10(4) copies/mL (2,000 IU/mL) in association with an elevated ALT level. The presence of at least moderate necroinflammation and the presence of fibrosis on liver biopsy, which is optional and not mandatory before therapy, may be useful in supporting the decision to initiate therapy, particularly in patients with normal ALT levels. While undergoing therapy, patients require monitoring every 3 to 6 months to ensure compliance and to test for the development of resistance if an oral agent is used. Issues that remain controversial or need to be studied further are the necessity of a baseline liver biopsy, the HBV DNA and ALT thresholds for initiation of therapy, the optimal duration of antiviral therapy, selection of one agent over another, and the role of combination therapy.     

Telbivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B: A journey to identify super‐responders and to optimize treatment using the roadmap model

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most serious health problems worldwide with a high risk for cirrhosis and liver cancer. Several antiviral agents have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, leading to a rapid reduction in HBV DNA and normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Telbivudine, a potent inhibitor of HBV replication, has been shown to be well tolerated. Because of the emergence of drug resistance, optimization strategies for telbivudine therapy have been shown to improve patient responses. Optimal baseline characteristics in so‐called super‐responders have been used to predict the virological response. Baseline HBV DNA levels < 9 log₁₀ copies/mL (2 × 10⁸ IU/mL) or alanine aminotransferase levels of more than or equal to twofold the upper limit of normal in HBeAg‐positive patients and HBV DNA < 7 log₁₀ copies/mL (2 × 10⁶ IU/mL) in HBeAg‐negative patients were strong predictors for virological response. In addition, the roadmap model, based on early virological response at week 24 of therapy, is considered as a powerful tool to identify patients at risk of treatment failure (HBV DNA ≥ 300 copies/mL, i.e. 60 IU/mL) and to reduce the risk of antiviral resistance. When considering pre‐treatment characteristics and on‐treatment responses, telbivudine may provide physicians with a wide choice of options to effectively treat patients with chronic hepatitis B, especially those with or at risk of renal impairment, or women of childbearing age.     

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B

The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is made using a combination of serological, virological, biochemical, and histological markers. The natural history of HBV infection can be divided into 3 phases: immune tolerant, immune active with chronic hepatitis B, and inactive carrier; patients in the immune active phase are candidates for antiviral therapy. The primary goal of therapy for chronic hepatitis B is suppression of viral replication, which has been shown to reduce hepatic necroinflammation and retard progression of hepatic fibrosis. Long-term suppression of serum HBV DNA is likely to reduce progression to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation and may also decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B includes interferon alpha, lamivudine and adefovir, with recent studies demonstrating good safety and efficacy of peginterferon and other nucleoside analogues that will soon become additional treatment options. In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, antiviral treatment is indicated when the serum HBV DNA level is = or >10(5) copies/mL and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level is elevated, particularly greater than 2 times the upper limits of normal. For HBeAg-negative patients, the threshold for initiation of therapy is a HBV DNA level = or >10(4) in association with an elevated ALT level. The presence of at least moderate necroinflammation and the presence of fibrosis on liver biopsy, which is optional and not mandatory before therapy, may be useful in supporting the decision to initiate therapy. While undergoing therapy, patients require monitoring every 3 to 6 months to ensure compliance and to test for the development of resistance if an oral agent is used. Issues that remain controversial or need to be studied further are the necessity of a baseline liver biopsy, the HBV DNA and ALT thresholds for initiation of therapy, the optimal duration of antiviral therapy, selection of one agent over another, and the role of combination therapy.     

Quantitative serum HBV DNA levels during different stages of chronic hepatitis B infection

The goals of this retrospective study were to determine whether there is a threshold hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA value associated with spontaneous or antiviral therapy-related hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance. We also investigated whether there is an HBV DNA value that can be used for differentiating inactive carriers from patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. HBV DNA levels in sequential serum samples of 165 Chinese patients with different stages of chronic HBV infection were quantified by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay. Our results showed that almost all of the patients (89%) who remained HBeAg-positive had HBV DNA levels that were persistently above 10(5) copies/mL. Serum HBV DNA levels decreased by a mean of 3 log(10) in patients with HBeAg loss, but 51% had levels above 10(5) copies/mL at the time HBeAg first became undetectable. Mean serum HBV DNA levels were significantly lower in HBeAg-negative patients. HBV DNA value above 10(5) copies/mL would exclude all inactive carriers, but 45% of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis would also be excluded if testing were only performed at presentation and 30% would be excluded if testing were performed on 3 occasions. In conclusion, serum HBV DNA levels decreased significantly in patients with HBeAg loss, but there was no threshold HBV DNA level associated with HBeAg clearance. Given the fluctuating course of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis, it is not possible to define a single cutoff HBV DNA value for differentiating inactive carriers from patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis.     

Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adefovir dipivoxil possesses potent in vitro and in vivo antiviral activity in wild-type hepatitis B. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil alone and in combination with lamivudine compared with ongoing lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B with compensated liver disease and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). METHODS: Fifty-nine hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with genotypic evidence of lamivudine-resistant HBV, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level > or =1.2 times the upper limit of normal, and serum HBV DNA level > or =6 log(10) copies/mL despite ongoing treatment with lamivudine were randomized to adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg, lamivudine 100 mg, or addition of adefovir dipivoxil to ongoing lamivudine daily. The primary end point was the time-weighted average change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level (DAVG) up to week 16. RESULTS: Rapid reductions in serum HBV DNA level were seen by 4 weeks in all recipients of adefovir dipivoxil; DAVG(16) was -0.07 in the lamivudine group compared with -2.45 and -2.46 log(10) copies/mL in the adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Median change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level at week 48 was 0.0, -3.59, and -4.04 log(10) copies/mL in the lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine, and adefovir dipivoxil groups, respectively. ALT level normalized in 10 of 19 (53%) and 9 of 18 (47%) recipients of adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, respectively, compared with 1 of 19 (5%) recipients of lamivudine. Three patients receiving adefovir dipivoxil or adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine and none receiving lamivudine monotherapy were HBeAg negative at week 48 and one became hepatitis B surface antigen negative. CONCLUSIONS: These data, limited to patients with compensated liver disease, indicate that adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with ongoing lamivudine therapy provides effective antiviral therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV.     

Long-term efficacy of entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with antiviral resistance to lamivudine and adefovir

No studies have reported the long-term effects of entecavir switching in patients with multidrug resistance who developed resistance after lamivudine/adefovir sequential therapy. We evaluated the efficacy of 96 weeks of entecavir therapy in patients with resistance to lamivudine/adefovir sequential therapy. In total, 33 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with evidence of active viral replication (HBV DNA levels ≥ 10(5) copies/mL) or a history of treatment failure to lamivudine/adefovir sequential therapy between April 2007 and July 2009 were treated with entecavir (1.0 mg daily) for at least 48 weeks. The rates of alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization and HBV DNA negativity were 66.7% (14/21) and 24.2% (8/33) at 48 weeks, respectively. The initial HBV DNA level was the only factor that was inversely associated with serum HBV DNA negativity after 48 weeks of entecavir therapy (P < 0.023). At 96 weeks, the rates of ALT normalization and HBV DNA negativity were 77.8% (7/9) and 16.7% (3/18), respectively. Viral breakthrough occurred in 21.2% (7/33) and 78.9% (15/19) of patients at 48 and 96 weeks, respectively. Patients who achieved a HBV DNA level of <4 log(10) copies/mL at 48 weeks maintained a similar HBV DNA level and a normal ALT level until 96 weeks. Entecavir monotherapy for 96 weeks was not efficacious for patients with lamivudine/adefovir-resistant HBV. The initial HBV DNA level was the only predictive factor for antiviral efficacy. However, patients who achieved a HBV DNA level of <4 log(10) copies/mL with a normal ALT level at 48 weeks should maintain, rather than stop, entecavir therapy.     

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lamivudine resistance occurs in patients with chronic hepatitis B at rates of 16%-32% after 1 year and 49% after 3 years. Adefovir dipivoxil, a nucleotide analogue recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, is effective against hepatitis B virus (HBV) but has been associated with renal toxicity at high doses. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is another nucleotide analogue with demonstrated antiviral activity against both wild-type and lamivudine-resistant HBV. Tenofovir, at its licensed dose, has not been associated with renal dysfunction. METHODS: We describe a series of 9 patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B treated with tenofovir, 300 mg, once daily before the availability of adefovir. Levels of HBV DNA, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe) were monitored. RESULTS: The addition of tenofovir to the existing regimen of lamivudine resulted in a median decline of 4.5 log(10) copies/mL in HBV DNA levels (range, 3.2-6.3 log(10) copies/mL) after a median treatment duration of 12 months (range, 6-16 mo). HBeAg seroconversion was observed in 2 patients, with a third patient undergoing HBeAg loss while remaining anti-HBe negative. In 4 of 7 patients with elevated ALT levels at baseline, ALT levels normalized. No significant adverse events were encountered during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B, treatment with tenofovir is well tolerated and results in significant virological, serological, and biochemical improvements on par with those seen with high-dose adefovir (30 mg/day) therapy, without the complication of renal toxicity.     

替比夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎108周的临床疗效

目的 探讨替比夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者108周的临床疗效.方法 随机选择就诊于吉林大学中日联谊医院未经过抗病毒治疗的72例CHB患者,其中包括35例肝硬化患者,给予口服替比夫定600 mg,1次/d,连续治疗108周.观察患者治疗前、后血清HBV DNA水平,肝功能及HBV标志物.根据12周和24周时的HBV DNA水平将患者分为＜3 log_(10)拷贝/ml和≥3 log_(10)拷贝/ml两组,比较其在治疗108周时的疗效.疗效比较采用χ~2检验.结果 替比夫定治疗4周时,HBV DNA不可测率及ALT复常率分别为37.5%和33.3%,至108周时达到87.5%和91.7%.46例HBeAg阳性患者治疗108周时HBeAg消失率及血清学转换率分别为39.1%和23.9%.12周时HBV DNA水平＜3 log_(10)拷贝/ml的患者,108周时的HBV DNA不可测率及HBeAg血清学转换率明显高于HBV DNA≥3 log_(10)拷贝/ml的患者(χ~2值分别为7.96和3.94,P值均＜0.05).24周时HBV DNA＜3log_(10)拷贝/ml的患者,108周时的HBV DNA不可测率高于HBVDNA≥3 log_(10)拷贝/ml的患者(χ~2=10.13,P＜0.05),耐药发生率低于HBV DNA≥3 log_(10)拷贝/ml的患者(χ~2=4.82,P＜0.05).替比夫定抗病毒治疗108周时肝硬化患者Child-Pugh分级较治疗前明显改善,其中Child A级患者比例明显增加(χ~2=5.83,P＜0.05).结论 替比夫定可强效、快速抑制HBV DNA复制,HBeAg血清学转换率高,长期治疗可明显改善肝硬化患者Child-Pugh评分,获得早期病毒学应答者的耐药发生率低.     

Twenty-four-week clevudine therapy showed potent and sustained antiviral activity in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

Clevudine is a pyrimidine analogue with potent and sustained antiviral activity against HBV. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 30 mg clevudine once daily for 24 weeks and assessed the durable antiviral response for 24 weeks after cessation of dosing. A total of 243 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B patients were randomized (3:1) to receive clevudine 30 mg once daily (n=182) or placebo (n=61) for 24 weeks. Patients were followed for a further 24 weeks off therapy. Median serum HBV DNA reductions from baseline at week 24 were 5.10 and 0.27 log10 copies/mL in the clevudine and placebo groups, respectively (P<0.0001). Viral suppression in the clevudine group was sustained off therapy, with 3.73 log10 reduction at week 34 and 2.02 log10 reduction at week 48. At week 24, 59.0% of patients in the clevudine group had undetectable serum HBV DNA levels by Amplicor PCR assay (less than 300 copies/mL). The proportion of patients who achieved normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels was 68.2% in the clevudine group and 17.5% in the placebo group at week 24 (P<0.0001). ALT normalization in the clevudine group was well maintained during post-treatment follow-up period. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the clevudine group and the placebo group. No resistance to clevudine was detected with 24 weeks of administration of drug. CONCLUSION: A 24-week clevudine therapy was well tolerated and showed potent and sustained antiviral effect without evidence of viral resistance during treatment period in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.     

The Management of Chronic Hepatitis B in Asian Americans

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is common with major clinical consequences worldwide. In Asian Americans, the HBsAg carrier rate ranges from 7 to 16%; HBV is the most important cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients are first diagnosed at different stages of clinical disease, which is categorized by biochemical and virologic tests. Patients at risk for liver complications should be identified and offered antiviral therapy. The two antiviral agents recommended for first-line treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are entecavir and tenofovir. The primary goal of therapy is sustained suppression of viral replication to achieve clinical remission, reverse fibrosis, and prevent and reduce progression to end-stage liver disease and HCC. Asian patients with chronic hepatitis, either HBeAg-positive or -negative, with HBV DNA levels >10⁴ copies/mL (>2,000 IU/mL) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values above normal are candidates for antiviral therapy. HBeAg-negative patients with HBV DNA >10⁴ copies/mL (>2,000 IU/mL) and normal ALT levels but who have either serum albumin ≤3.5 g/dL or platelet count ≤130,000 mm³, basal core promoter mutations, or who have first-degree relatives with HCC should be offered treatment. Patients with cirrhosis and detectable HBV DNA must receive antiviral therapy. Considerations for treatment include pregnant women with high viremia, coinfected patients, and those requiring immunosuppressive therapy. In HBsAg-positive patients with risk factors, lifelong surveillance for HCC with alpha-fetoprotein testing and abdominal ultrasound examination at 6-month intervals is required. These recommendations are based on a review of relevant literature and the opinion of a panel of Asian American physicians with expertise in hepatitis B treatment.     

Prolonged antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus-infected health care workers: a feasible option to prevent work restriction without jeopardizing patient safety

To prevent transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from health care workers (HCWs) to patients, highly viraemic HCWs are often advised to restrict performing exposure prone procedures (EPPs). To prevent loss of highly qualified medical personnel and simultaneously minimize transmission risk to patients, we offered highly viraemic HCWs antiviral therapy and evaluated the effects of this strategy. Eighteen chronic HBV-infected HCWs have been monitored every 3-6 months for a median period of 5.6 years (range 1.1-12.5 years). Antiviral therapy was offered if HBV DNA was above 10(5) copies/mL and EPPs were performed or active liver disease was present. Median HBV DNA levels, the percentage of days with HBV DNA above 10(3), 10(4) and 10(5) copies/mL, and reduction of HBV DNA during antiviral treatment have been analysed for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative HCWs separately. Prolonged viral suppression was achieved in both HBeAg-positive, as well as HBeAg-negative HCWs. In HBeAg-negative HCWs treatment with interferon or lamivudine maintained HBV DNA levels below 10(5) copies/mL. For HBeAg-positive HCWs continuous treatment with tenofovir or entecavir was essential for reaching low viraemia persistently. In 2004, median HBV DNA levels in both HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive HCWs were below 10(3) copies/mL and all HCWs executed their professional work full-range. For both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HCWs, antiviral treatment is effective in persistent suppression of virus levels below 10(5) copies/mL. This observation supports antiviral therapy as a viable management option instead of work restriction, with the provision of regular expert monitoring including quantification of HBV DNA.     

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus during interferon‐free therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir in patient with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus co‐infection

Direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) are not effective for hepatitis B virus (HBV), which may be suggestive of reactivation of anti‐HBe hepatitis during interferon (IFN)‐free DAA therapy in HBV/HCV co‐infected patients with inactive HBV. A 69‐year‐old male patient was diagnosed with chronic hepatitis due to HBV/HCV co‐infection with serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 94 U/L, HCV RNA of 4.2 log IU/mL and HBV DNA of 2.5 log copies/mL. HCV was thought to be responsible for the hepatitis activity because of low level of HBV core‐related antigen (3.1 log U/mL). He was treated with combination therapy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir. Serum ALT gradually increased, and reached 237 U/L on day 43 in spite of undetectable HCV RNA. Serum HBV DNA was increasing to 7.0 log copies/mL at that time. The treatment was stopped due to suspicion of drug‐induced liver injury and/or HBV reactivation. Administration of entecavir reduced HBV DNA levels, followed by improvement in ALT levels. This report proposes that close monitoring of HBV DNA during the anti‐HCV DAA therapy and the commencement of anti‐HBV therapy with nucleoside analogs after the increase of HBV DNA should be considered in patients with HBV/HCV co‐infection.     

The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Three stages of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are recognized: the immune tolerant phase, the chronic hepatitis B phase, and the inactive hepatitis B carrier phase. Active liver disease is most often found in persons with elevated aminotransferase levels and HBV DNA levels >10(5) copies/mL. Possible risk factors for developing liver disease include older age, male gender, presence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV genotype, mutations in the precore and core promoter regions of the viral genome, and coinfection with hepatitis D (delta) virus. All persons chronically infected with HBV should be followed every 6 to 12 months with aminotransferase levels. Those with elevated levels should be tested for HBeAg and its antibody (anti-HBe) as well as HBV DNA levels to determine if they are in need of further evaluation with a liver biopsy and are candidates for antiviral therapy. Future research will help clarify the outcome of chronic HBV infection.     

Combined lamivudine and famciclovir therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVE: No single antiviral drug is able to eradicate hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. It has been shown in vitro that lamivudine and panciclovir (the active metabolite of famciclovir) act synergistically to inhibit HBV replication. To study the therapeutic efficacy of combined lamivudine and famciclovir therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: Twenty‐one patients with chronic hepatitis B, who had been given lamivudine monotherapy for more than 6 months without improve­ment, had increased serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV‐DNA levels, and were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); 17 were positive for HBeAg. The diagnosis was verified by histology in 12 HBeAg‐positive cases. All patients were given combined therapy with lami­vudine (100 mg q.d.) and famciclovir (500 mg t.i.d.) orally for 4 months, and then with lamivudine alone for 5?10 months. RESULTS: Serum HBV‐DNA levels were initially 1 × 10^{8.19 ± 1.18} copies/mL, then decreased to 1 × 10^{5.25 ± 1.18} copies/mL at the end of the combined treatment and 1 × 10^{5.25 ± 1.82} copies/mL in the follow‐up period (P < 0.01). Serum ALT decreased from 225 ± 110 U/L before the trial to 79 ± 50 U/L at the end of the combined treatment and 81 ± 48 U/L in the follow‐up period (P < 0.01). In 17 HBeAg‐positive patients, eight (47.1%) had HBeAg/anti‐hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion with a significant decrease of HBV‐DNA (<1 × 10⁴ copies/mL) and normal ALT (P < 0.01). Of four HBeAg‐negative patients, three had decreased levels of HBV‐DNA, to below 1 × 10⁴ copies/mL, which was associated with a significant decrease in ALT. Two patients had recurrent flare‐ups in the follow‐up period, but both HBV‐DNA and ALT were lower than the pretreatment levels. In 10 patients who underwent a second liver biopsy, improvements in inflammatory activity and fibrosis were seen in eight (80%) and four (40%) cases, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment of lamivudine and famciclovir has synergistic or additive anti‐HBV effects, and may be an alternative therapy for patients with active chronic hepatitis B.     

Prevention of lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only

T. Karlas, J. Hartmann, A. Weimann, M. Maier, M. Bartels, S. Jonas, J. Mössner, T. Berg, H.L. Tillmann, J. Wiegand. Prevention of lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only.
Transpl Infect Dis 2011: 13: 299–302. All rights reserved Abstract: Combination therapy with antivirals plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) has become the standard treatment for prevention of post‐liver transplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, HBIg therapy is inconvenient and expensive. Alternative therapeutic approaches with modern nucleos(t)ide analogues are limited so far. The present case report describes prevention of HBV recurrence with entecavir and tenofovir. A 48‐year‐old male patient with hepatitis B‐induced decompensated liver cirrhosis initially improved on lamivudine (LAM) until LAM resistance (rtL180M and rtM204V) emerged followed by renewed decompensation. Therefore, tenofovir was added to LAM leading to undetectable HBV DNA (<200 copies/mL). Six months later, low‐level viremia (479 copies/mL) was detected. Treatment was escalated to tenofovir plus entecavir. HBV DNA became negative again, and the patient underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. HBIg was administered during transplantation (10,000 IU) and on the second and third postoperative days (total dose 26,000 IU). Subsequently, the anti‐hepatitis B surface (HBs) titer rose to 1477 IU/L at day 4 post transplantation. Although HBIg should have been continued, the patient remained on combination therapy with tenofovir plus entecavir only. The anti‐HBs titer decreased and became negative 4 months later. However, under continued combination therapy with oral antivirals, HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen remained negative during the entire follow‐up of 21 months after liver transplantation. Combination therapy with entecavir plus tenofovir may prevent post‐liver transplant hepatitis B recurrence even without HBIg maintenance therapy. This case illustrates that combination oral antiviral therapy might substitute for HBIg as indefinite prophylactic regimen due to profound antiviral efficacy and low risk of viral resistance. Efficacy and safety must be further investigated in randomized controlled trials.     

Entecavir for treatment of lamivudine-refractory, HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lamivudine treatment is associated with frequent development of resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) and loss of treatment benefit. In preclinical and phase II studies, entecavir demonstrated potent antiviral activity against lamivudine-resistant HBV. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blind trial, hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients who were refractory to lamivudine therapy (persistent viremia or documented YMDD mutations while receiving lamivudine) were randomized to switch to entecavir 1 mg daily (n = 141) or continue lamivudine 100 mg daily (n = 145) for a minimum of 52 weeks. Two coprimary end points were assessed at 48 weeks: histologic improvement and a composite end point (HBV branched DNA <0.7 MEq/mL and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] <1.25 times the upper limit of normal). RESULTS: Histologic improvement occurred in 55% (68/124) of entecavir-treated vs 28% (32/116) of lamivudine-treated patients (P < .0001). More patients on entecavir than lamivudine achieved the composite end point: 55% (77/141) vs 4% (6/145), respectively (P < .0001). Mean change from baseline in HBV DNA was -5.11 log(10) copies/mL for entecavir-treated patients and -0.48 log(10) copies/mL for lamivudine-treated patients (P < .0001). Virologic rebound because of entecavir resistance substitutions occurred in 2 of 141 of entecavir-treated patients, and genotypic evidence of resistance was detected in 10 patients. The safety profile of entecavir was comparable to lamivudine with fewer ALT flares on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B, switching to entecavir provides superior histologic improvement, viral load reduction, and ALT normalization compared with continuing lamivudine, with a comparable adverse event profile.     

Clevudine for chronic hepatitis B: antiviral response,predictors of response,and development of myopathy

Summary. Clevudine has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in South Korea. However, its long‐term antiviral effect and safety awaits more study. The aim of this study was to evaluate antiviral efficacy, predictors of virologic response, and development of myopathy after clevudine therapy for CHB. The study included 102 nucleoside naïve CHB patients who had received clevudine for more than 6 months with good compliance. The median duration of clevudine treatment was 53 weeks (range, 25–90 weeks). A retrospective analysis of data retrieved from medical records was performed. The cumulative rate of virologic response [hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level <2000 copies/mL] at 48 weeks of clevudine therapy was 81%, and cumulative rate of clevudine resistance was 11% at 60 weeks of treatment. Independent predictors of virologic response to clevudine therapy were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negativity and rapid decrease of viral load during the early phase of treatment. The clevudine‐related myopathy developed in 3.9% of patients, and was reversible after discontinuation of clevudine. Clevudine showed a potent antiviral response, and its effect was higher in HBeAg‐negative patients, with rapid viral load reduction after therapy. However, long‐term therapy for more than 1 year resulted in the development of considerable resistance and myopathy. Therefore, we should consider alternative antiviral agents if clevudine resistance or clevudine‐induced myopathy is developed in patients on clevudine for the treatment of CHB.     

Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen titers in prediction of treatment response to entecavir

Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) and quantitative hepatitis B e antigen (qHBeAg) titers are emerging as useful tools for measuring viral loads and for predicting the virological response (VR) and serological response (SR) to pegylated interferon therapy. However, the clinical utility of these assays in patients taking entecavir (ETV) is largely unknown. Treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who were taking ETV for 2 years were enrolled. The qHBsAg and qHBeAg levels were serially measured with the Architect assay. From 95 patients, 60.0% of whom were hepatitis B e antigen-positive [HBeAg(+)], 475 samples were analyzed. The median baseline log hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, log qHBsAg, and log qHBeAg values were 6.73 copies/mL (4.04-9.11 copies/mL), 3.58 IU/mL (1.17-5.10 IU/mL), and 1.71 Paul Ehrlich (PE) IU/mL (-0.64 to 2.63 PE IU/mL), respectively. For the prediction of VR (HBV DNA < 60 copies/mL at 24 months) in HBeAg(+) patients, baseline alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.013), HBV DNA (P = 0.040), and qHBsAg levels (P = 0.033) were significant. For the prediction of VR, the area under the curve for the baseline log qHBsAg level was 0.823 (P < 0.001); a cutoff level of 3.98 IU/mL (9550 IU/mL on a nonlogarithmic scale) yielded the highest predictive value with a sensitivity of 86.8% and a specificity of 78.9%. As for SR (HBeAg loss at 24 months), the reduction of qHBeAg was significantly greater in the SR(+) group versus the SR(-) group. The sensitivity and specificity were 75.0% and 89.8%, respectively, with a decline of 1.00 PE IU/mL at 6 months. With ETV therapy, the correlation between HBV DNA and qHBsAg peaked at 6 months in HBeAg(+) patients. CONCLUSION: Both qHBsAg and qHBeAg decreased significantly with ETV therapy. The baseline qHBsAg levels and the on-treatment decline of qHBeAg in HBeAg(+) patients were proven to be highly useful in predicting VR and SR, respectively. The determination of qHBsAg and qHBeAg can help us to select the appropriate strategy for the management of patients with CHB. However, the dynamic interplay between qHBsAg, qHBeAg, and HBV DNA during antiviral therapy remains to be elucidated.     

Current treatment indications and strategies in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

The optimal approach to the management of several marginal cases with chronic hepatitis B virus （HBV） infection is controversial. Serum HBV DNA and aminotransferase levels, and the degree of necroinflammation and fibrosis determine the therapeutic decisions. All patients with elevated aminotransferase （〉 twice the upper limit of normal） and serum HBV DNA above 20000 IU/mL should be treated. Liver biopsy is important for therapeutic decisions in cases with mild aminotransferase elevations and serum HBV DNA below 20000 IU/mL. Chronic HBV patients who do not receive treatment should be followed for life. There are seven agents licensed for chronic hepatitis B： standard and pegylated interferon-alpha, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir. One-year courses with pegylated interferon-alpha induce sustained offtherapy remission in 30%-32% of patients with HBeAg- positive chronic hepatitis B and in a smaller proportion of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Oral antivirals achieve initial on-therapy responses in the majority of patients, but are intended as long-term therapies. Viral suppression has favourable effects on patients＇ outcome and modifies the natural course of the disease. Viral resistance, however, is the major drawback of long-term oral antiviral therapy. Lamivudine monotherapy is associated with the highest and entecavir monotherapy with the lowest resistance rate so far. There has been no resistance to tenofovir, but after only 18 mo of treatment to date. The optimal first-line anti-HBV therapy with the best long-term cost/benefit ratio remains unclear. If oral antiviral agents are used, compliance should always be ascertained and HBV DNA levels should be regularly tested.